Treatment of posttraumatic and focal osteoarthritic cartilage defects of the knee with autologous polymer-based three-dimensional chondrocyte grafts: 2-year clinical results
© Ossendorf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 21 November 2006
Accepted: 23 April 2007
Published: 23 April 2007
Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is an effective clinical procedure for the regeneration of articular cartilage defects. BioSeed®-C is a second-generation ACI tissue engineering cartilage graft that is based on autologous chondrocytes embedded in a three-dimensional bioresorbable two-component gel-polymer scaffold. In the present prospective study, we evaluated the short-term to mid-term efficacy of BioSeed-C for the arthrotomic and arthroscopic treatment of posttraumatic and degenerative cartilage defects in a group of patients suffering from chronic posttraumatic and/or degenerative cartilage lesions of the knee. Clinical outcome was assessed in 40 patients with a 2-year clinical follow-up before implantation and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation by using the modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, the Lysholm score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the current health assessment form (SF-36) of the International Knee Documentation Committee, as well as histological analysis of second-look biopsies. Significant improvement (p < 0.05) in the evaluated scores was observed at 1 and/or 2 years after implantation of BioSeed-C, and histological staining of the biopsies showed good integration of the graft and formation of a cartilaginous repair tissue. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score showed significant improvement in the subclasses pain, other symptoms, and knee-related quality of life 2 years after implantation of BioSeed-C in focal osteoarthritic defects. The results suggest that implanting BioSeed-C is an effective treatment option for the regeneration of posttraumatic and/or osteoarthritic defects of the knee.
Cartilage has a low intrinsic regenerative and reparative capacity. Cartilage defects may be accompanied by pain, immobility, stiffness, and loss of quality of life, and can potentially lead to severe osteoarthritis in the long term. Because chondral lesions of the knee occur frequently and are a great health problem, several efforts were made to develop techniques for restoration of the cartilage surface and regeneration of the cartilage . These common repair techniques comprise debridement, bone marrow-stimulating techniques, osteochondral grafting, and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) [2–5]. Some of these techniques may be useful only for small defects , whereas others merely provide limited durability of the repair tissue [7, 8]. Using the cell-based approach of ACI, such disadvantages were not reported [9, 10].
Since the clinical introduction of ACI by Brittberg and colleagues , more than 15,000 patients worldwide have been treated with ACI  and a variety of clinical studies have documented the clinical effectiveness of implanting autologous culture-expanded chondrocytes for the regeneration of cartilage [9, 12–14]. ACI involves the use of a periosteal flap or a collagen sheet , which is fixed to the surrounding cartilage and creates a reservoir for the injection of the autologous chondrocyte cell suspension. The use of ACI may therefore be delicate or even impossible in some regions of the knee. In ACI, the fixation of the periosteal flap or collagen sheets covering the chondrocyte suspension may be insecure, especially in degenerative defects lacking an intact cartilage rim. In addition, periosteal hypertrophy, ablation, uneven cell distribution, and loss of cells into the joint cavity may be potential sources of complications [16, 17] resulting in repetition of surgery in up to 25 to 36% of the patients [15, 18].
Recently, to overcome the intrinsic technical disadvantages of ACI, cartilage tissue engineering grafts were developed that use the regenerative potential of autologous chondrocytes with three-dimensional scaffolds to stabilize the graft. Meanwhile, clinical results show the safety and effectiveness of hyaluronan-based [19, 20] and collagen-based autologous chondrocyte grafts for the repair of cartilage defects [21, 22].
More advanced cartilage tissue engineering grafts ensure the even distribution of a high number of vital chondrocytes, mediate initial biomechanical stability, promote chondrocyte differentiation and the formation of cartilage matrix, inhibit chondrocyte proliferation, and allow easy handling of the graft by the surgeon . The cartilage tissue engineering graft BioSeed®-C combines autologous chondrocytes with the tissue development-promoting properties of gel-like matrices in an initially mechanically stable bioresorbable polymer scaffold . Polymer-based cartilage tissue engineering grafts for the regeneration of articular cartilage defects have been shown to facilitate development toward hyaline cartilage in vitro . Three-dimensional assembly of chondrocytes in fibrin and polymer-based scaffolds initiates the redifferentiation of dedifferentiated culture-expanded chondrocytes, whereas matrix formation and tissue maturation occur in vivo after implantation of the graft . Preclinical evaluation in the large-animal horse model showed the formation of a hyaline-like cartilage matrix as well as firm bonding of the graft to the adjacent healthy cartilage and to the subchondral bone tissue . In BioSeed-C, the chondrocytes are immobilized in and protected by the fibrin-polymer matrix; additional cover materials or a healthy cartilage rim surrounding the defect are therefore not mandatory, and arthroscopical implantation and secure fixation are feasible .
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate ACI using BioSeed-C, which is based on a bioresorbable two-component gel-polymer scaffold, for the treatment of posttraumatic, mild degenerative, and osteoarthritic defects of the knee. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological analyses of the cartilage repair tissue as well as the clinical evaluation of a series of 40 patients with a 2-year clinical follow-up document the effectiveness of BioSeed-C for the treatment of cartilage defects.
Materials and methods
This ongoing prospective observational case report study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of BioSeed-C for the treatment of posttraumatic and degenerative cartilage defects of the knee. Candidates for inclusion were patients suffering from posttraumatic, mild degenerative, or osteoarthritic clinically significant, symptomatic defects of the articular cartilage of the knee. Patients gave their consent to participate.
Group 1 (Jaeger-Wirth score < 3)
Group 2 (Jaeger-Wirth score = 3)
13 female, 14 male
5 female, 8 male
34 (range 17–47)
38 (range 25–64)
175 (range 160–189)
174 (range 164–181)
76.85 (range 54–100)
76.25 (range 60–102)
Body mass index
25 (range 19–34)
25 (range 21–31)
Defect size, 1st lesion (cm2)
4.2 (range 2–6)
5 (range 2–15)
Cartilage grade, 1st lesion, Outerbridge
IV (n = 27)
IV (n = 13)
Localization, 1st lesion
Medial femoral condyle (n = 19), lateral femoral condyle (n = 2), patella (n = 4), trochlea (n = 1), tibia (n = 1)
Medial femoral condyle (n = 8), lateral femoral condyle (n = 1), patella (n = 2), trochlea (n = 2)
n = 6
n = 6
Defect size, 2nd lesion (cm2)
2.5 (range 1–4)
3 (range 2–4)
Cartilage grade, 2nd lesion, Outerbridge
IV (n = 6)
II (n = 1), IV (n = 5)
Localization, 2nd lesion
Patella (n = 4), trochlea (n = 2)
Medial femoral condyle (n = 2), lateral femoral condyle (n = 1), trochlea (n = 3),
Previous surgical procedures
High tibial osteotomy (n = 6), shaving (n = 15), abrasion arthroplasty (n = 4), microfracture/drilling (n = 8), ACI (n = 1), meniscectomy (n = 10), anterior cruciate ligament/collateral ligament reconstruction (n = 7), lateral release (n = 2)
High tibial osteotomy (n = 2), shaving (n = 8), abrasion arthroplasty (n = 4), microfracture/drilling (n = 4), ACI (n = 2), meniscectomy (n = 10), anterior cruciate ligament/collateral ligament reconstruction (n = 6)
In general, the average age of patients (18 females, 22 males; mean body mass index 25, range 19 to 34) was 36 years (range 17 to 64 years). The mean defect size of the first lesion was 4.6 cm2 (range 2 to 15 cm2). All defects (first lesion) were classified as Outerbridge class IV . The defects (first lesion) were situated on the medial femoral condyle (n = 27), on the lateral femoral condyle (n = 3), on the patella (n = 6), on the trochlea (n = 3), or on the tibia (n = 1). Previous surgical procedures were meniscectomies (n = 20), anterior cruciate ligament/collateral ligament reconstructions (n = 13), lateral releases (n = 2), abrasion arthroplasty (n = 7), drilling or microfracture (n = 13), shaving (n = 23), high tibial osteotomy (n = 8), or ACI (n = 3). When implanting BioSeed-C, 24 concomitant surgical procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (n = 10), high tibial osteotomy (n = 10), drilling/microfracture (n = 2), patella realignment surgery (n = 1), and medial capsular shift (n = 1) were performed.
To assess the degree of osteoarthritic degeneration of the defects, the Jaeger-Wirth score and the Kellgren-Lawrence score were applied. Thirteen of the patients had osteoarthritic cartilage defects showing a Jaeger-Wirth score of 3 [30, 31]; 27 patients had posttraumatic and/or mild degenerative defects showing a Jaeger-Wirth score of 1 to 2, or had no signs of osteoarthritis.
Radiographs of the respective knee of 30 of the patients with osteoarthritic symptoms were taken preoperatively. Osteoarthritic degenerations were evaluated with the Kellgren-Lawrence scoring system  by two independent observers. The observer was blinded to the procedure. A Kellgren-Lawrence score of 2 or more defines osteoarthritis in a particular joint and was found in 22 patients with a clinical follow-up of 2 years.
Clinical examinations were performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
Implantation of BioSeed-C
Autologous chondrocytes were isolated from approximately 250 mg of the patient's healthy cartilage that was harvested arthroscopically from a less weight-bearing area of the knee. For autologous chondrocyte cultivation, 100 ml of whole blood was collected with a conventional blood sampling system (Sarstedt AG, Nümbrecht, Germany). Chondrocytes were expanded in vitro and subsequently 20 million cells were rearranged three-dimensionally in fibrin and a polymer-based scaffold of polyglycolic/polylactic acid (polyglactin, vicryl) and polydioxanone. After careful debridement of the defective cartilage down to the subchondral bone, the tissue engineering graft (2 cm × 3 cm × 0.2 cm thick) was fitted to the size of the defect, implanted arthrotomically or arthroscopically at the defect site. The decision when to do arthroscopic implantation and when to perform open procedure was made on the basis of the location and size of the defects. Arthroscopic implantation was performed when defects were located on the medial/lateral condyle and when only one graft was sufficient to cover the defect.
As reported previously , for secure fixation the graft was armed on the corners with resorbable threads forming loops secured by three-fold knots that tightened pulley slings and served as anchors. On every corner of the defect, a k-wire was drilled transosseously with an inside-out technique. Then the pulley slings were pulled through the femoral bone by the guide wire and the knots were guided into the femoral bone, securely anchoring the graft.
Follow-up treatment of patients after transplantation of BioSeed-C
On the day after surgery, the rehabilitation program started with continuous passive motion and subsequently allowed mobilization and partial loading with 15% of body weight as well as isometric tension exercises for 6 weeks. At 7 to 12 weeks after surgery, patients gradually increased the loading and performed specific strengthening exercises, active physiotherapy, and, if appropriate, ergometric training at a gentle level. Crutches were used to take weight off the operated knee. From week 13 onward, patients increased weight bearing and performed muscular and coordination exercises up to full weight bearing. Gentle exertion (such as cycling or jogging) was allowed after 6 months, and more strenuous activities and contact sports (such as tennis or football) after 12 months. The postoperative treatment plan was not mandatory and was drawn up specifically for each patient. Patient compliance was not monitored.
Evaluation of clinical results
For evaluation of clinical results after transplantation of BioSeed-C, the modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System , the Lysholm score , the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score , and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Examination Form , with emphasis on the current health assessment form (SF-36), were applied and documented the clinical situation before transplantation of the graft and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after transplantation.
Radiological and histological evaluation of cartilage repair
At 6 and 12 months after transplantation, repair and resurfacing of cartilage defects were evaluated by MRI (Philips Magnetron, Philips, Hamburg, Germany); 14 of the 79 patients had second-look arthroscopy for investigative and diagnostic purposes. After patient's consent had been obtained, biopsies of the repair tissue (n = 4) were harvested 9 to 12 months after transplantation of BioSeed-C, for investigative purposes. Paraffin sections were stained with alcian blue and nuclear fast red or with hematoxylin and eosin.
For statistical analysis, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney rank sum test was applied; differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. All comparisons were performed between scorings at the individual points in time of the follow-up period against the preoperative scores.
Postoperative radiological and histological evaluation of repair tissue formation
Of the 79 patients, 14 underwent second-look arthroscopy as a result of symptoms such as persistent grinding, catching, pain, or swelling. The implanted grafts completely filled the defects and formed a tough hyaline-like cartilage (Figure 1b). MRI analysis at 6 months (Figure 1c) and 12 months (Figure 1d) after implantation showed good defect filling. The grafts were well integrated into the surrounding tissue and displayed good connection to the articular cartilage as well as to the underlying subchondral bone. No transplant loosening, debonding, ablation of the transplant, or articular constriction was observed. The newly formed cartilage showed a visible contrast in color to the surrounding cartilage, and transosseous drill holes were still evident. Subchondral edemas were not observed. Osseous healing after drilling did not differ from bone regeneration after osteosynthesis or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, for example.
Five patients underwent repeat surgery comprising synovectomies (n = 2), debridement (n = 1), total knee arthroplasty (n = 1), and removal of the graft (n = 1) in another hospital.
Clinical evaluation of surgical results 2 years after transplantation of BioSeed-C
To assess the impact of osteoarthritic degeneration of the cartilage on the functional outcome, two subgroups were considered, namely those with a Jaeger-Wirth score of 3, representing patients with osteoarthritic degeneration, and those with a score less than 3, comprising patients with posttraumatic and mild degenerative defects.
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score describes the patient's view about his knee and associated problems (Additional file 1). At 2 years of follow-up, the patient's status had improved significantly (p < 0.05) compared with the his or her preoperative situation, showing an increase in the mean scores of the subclasses pain (64.3 to 78.2), symptoms (68.2 to 78.9), activities of daily living (67.6 to 80.6), sports (25.8 to 45.7), and knee-related quality of life (26.9 to 52.9). Patients with posttraumatic and/or mild degenerative defects (Jaeger-Wirth score < 3) showed a significant improvement in only the subclass knee-related quality of life (28.4 to 52.9) 2 years after implantation, whereas patients with osteoarthritic degeneration showed improvement in pain (61.4 to 80.1), symptoms (64.0 to 78.4), and quality of life (23.6 to 52.8).
The health of patients was evaluated with the IKDC SF-36 current health assessment form (Additional file 2). Implantation of BioSeed-C resulted in a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in the mean scores after 6 months to 2 years in the subclasses physical functioning (42.8 to 64.6), role limitations due to physical health (25.7 to 53.6), bodily pain (38.9 to 61.6), general health problems (62.0 to 70.6), and social functioning (59.5 to 77.5) in all outcome measures compared with the patients' preoperative status. Evaluating the outcome measures according to the impact of the degree of osteoarthritic degeneration of the knee showed an improvement in the mean scores of the subclasses physical functioning (44.8 to 62.6), bodily pain (39.0 to 61.3), and social functioning (61.9 to 78.8) after implantation of BioSeed-C in posttraumatic and/or mild degenerative cartilage defects with a Jaeger-Wirth score of less than 3. Patients with osteoarthritic degeneration of the knee cartilage (Jaeger-Wirth score = 3) reported a significant impairment related to social functioning at 3 months after implantation of the cartilage transplant and showed a continual improvement in social functioning status from 6 months to 2 years. In addition, these patients showed a significant increase in the mean scores of the IKDC SF-36 subclasses physical functioning (38.8 to 68.3), role limitations due to physical health (10.4 to 52.1), and bodily pain (38.8 to 62.2) 2 years after implantation of BioSeed-C.
Clinical evaluation of surgical results 2 years after implantation of BioSeed-C in defects of patients with radiographically confirmed osteoarthritis
The Lysholm score showed significant improvement (p < 0.0001) in the median scores from 53.0 preoperatively to 79.5 after 2 years after implantation of BioSeed-C in focal osteoarthritic defects of the knee.
In the present study, we showed the benefit and reliability of the use of the autologous gel-polymer-based cartilage tissue engineering graft BioSeed-C for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee. The evaluation of the clinical outcome 2 years after implantation demonstrated that BioSeed-C is well suited for the treatment of patients with posttraumatic and mild degenerative defects as well as for the treatment of focal osteoarthritic defects.
The implantation of first-generation tissue engineering grafts such as ACI has been shown to be suitable for the regeneration of posttraumatic defects [12, 37]. However, second-generation cartilage tissue engineering grafts using a variety of matrices to support the autologous chondrocytes were recently considered to be technically more attractive. For instance, Bartlett and colleagues reported the use of a collagen-based scaffold seeded with autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of 47 symptomatic chondral defects. After 1 year, the Cincinnati Knee Rating System score increased by 19.6, and 36.4% of the biopsies showed hyaline-like cartilage or a mixed repair tissue with fibrocartilage. Similar outcomes were obtained for defects treated with 'classical' ACI with a porcine-based collagen membrane covering the defects . In a prospective study, 5 years after transplantation of cell-seeded collagen grafts, 8 of 11 patients rated the function of their knee better than before, and the clinical evaluation showed significant improvement in the Meyers score, the Lysholm-Gillquist score and the International Cartilage Repair Society score . In a multicenter retrospective cohort study with Hyalograft C, a graft of autologous chondrocytes embedded in a derivative of hyaluronic acid, 91.5% of 141 patients with a follow-up from 2 to 5 years improved according to the IKDC subjective evaluation, and second-look biopsies showed hyaline-like cartilage . The use of second-generation cartilage grafts based on collagen or hyaluronan matrices is therefore suggested to be as effective as ACI, both clinically and histologically.
Here we introduced the use of a new second-generation cartilage graft based on a biocompatible and bioresorbable two-component gel-polymer scaffold. The BioSeed-C concept of embedding autologous chondrocytes in a gel-like matrix distributed in a porous three-dimensional textile polymer structure goes back to more than 10 years of cartilage tissue engineering research [24, 25]. Gel-like matrices such as fibrin allow the even distribution of a large number of vital chondrocytes within the graft and promote chondrocyte differentiation as well as the formation of a cartilaginous repair tissue, while the polymer scaffold mediates initial biomechanical stability and allows easy handling of the graft by the surgeon [23, 38]. The arrangement of chondrocytes in three-dimensional scaffolds permits the arthroscopic implantation of cells, ensures secure fixation of the graft even in posttraumatic or degenerative defects without intact surrounding cartilage, and avoids the loss of cells into the joint cavity even after implantation in defects without an intact surrounding cartilage rim . Drobnic and colleagues have shown that the transosseous fixation technique provides excellent stability of the polymer-based graft with high endpoint fixation strength and no detachment after continuous passive motion with loading in the initial postoperative period . Mechanical testing of the scaffold used in this study showed that the graft withstands a maximal tensile load of up to 15 N when fixed transosseously or by chondral suture, whereas gel-like matrices or collagen membranes ruptured on being loaded with up to 10 N . The capability of such polymer-based grafts to form an adequate cartilaginous repair tissue has been shown preclinically in several animal studies with cryopreserved and non-cryopreserved chondrocytes [41, 42]. In addition, in a large-animal model system with Haflinger horses, polymer-based cartilage grafts have been shown to develop a cartilaginous repair tissue that is well integrated into the surrounding cartilage and is firmly bonded to the subchondral bone . The bioresorbable scaffold material is composed of a copolymer of polyglactin (vicryl) and polydioxanone, shows good biocompatibility, and is frequently used clinically as suture material. In a rabbit dural tissue reaction study, the absorbable polyglactin and polydioxanone material guided tissue development with complete resolution of the inflammatory reaction during absorption and without any morphological sequelae . Additionally, in cartilage regeneration, various in vitro and animal studies have shown that the scaffold supports cartilaginous tissue development with no signs of necrosis, apoptosis, or abnormal tissue reaction [26, 27, 38, 44].
In this case series we demonstrated the benefit and reliability of the gel-polymer-based chondrocyte graft BioSeed-C for the treatment of posttraumatic and degenerative large full-thickness cartilage lesions of the knee. Histological analysis of the biopsies after implantation of BioSeed-C showed good formation of a cartilaginous repair tissue, and significant improvements in the clinical scores used could be ascertained, implying improvements in activities of daily living, ability to work, and in sports. However, despite these encouraging results one must take into account the fact that randomized clinical trials and long follow-up periods may offer more widespread information about the clinical effectiveness of a given cartilage repair approach [13, 45–47]. ACI will therefore not be given an unrestricted recommendation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage lesions of the knee. Nevertheless, patient status at 2 years of follow-up was reported as an important indicator for future outcome , because most of the complications of ACI occur during this period. In addition, major improvements in clinical scores, clinical evaluation, and subjective patient satisfaction were found during this time; for example, patients who did not return to sports within 2 years did not return later. The features identified as an indicator of a worse prognosis, namely multiple surgical procedures, higher age, and large defects, correspond to findings published by others .
With the gel-polymer-based three-dimensional cartilage grafts, 18% of the patients in this study underwent second-look arthroscopy as a result of grinding, catching, pain, or swelling of the knee. This is consistent with other studies reporting rates of revision surgery between 0%  and 25% . Instead, 2 of 79 patients treated with BioSeed-C showed a failure of the graft, which represents a lower rate of graft failure than earlier findings, in which rates of failure in ACI with other implants between 5%  to 13%  were described. Repeat operations using the 'classical' ACI procedure as described by Peterson and Brittberg were mainly caused by problems associated with the periosteal flap [9, 17, 49]. This disadvantage of the original ACI technique could not occur in patients treated with BioSeed-C. Another advantage of the BioSeed technique is the reduced operating time. Furthermore, the procedure is less invasive because there is no need to harvest periosteum from the tibia. The complication rate is lower because there is no possibility of periosteal hypertrophy, which is a common complication of ACI . Furthermore, the BioSeed-C procedure can be performed arthroscopically, which may be associated with faster recovery after surgery and with cosmetically better results. However, it should be taken into consideration that performing ACI arthroscopically is technically demanding and the use of specially designed instruments is essential.
After 2 years of follow-up, mean scores increased significantly, between 20 and 35% depending on the score analyzed. This indicates a significant decrease in the patient's pain and knee instabilities during activity. Intriguingly, Cincinnati score improvement at 6 months after implantation of BioSeed-C could be observed only in patients with osteoarthritic degenerations. In addition, patients suffering from osteoarthritic degenerations showed an improved Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in pain, symptoms, and quality of life, whereas scores for patients whose cartilage defects resulted from posttraumatic causes increased only in the quality of life section. According to the impact of the degree of osteoarthritic degeneration, patients with osteoarthritis of the knee reported impairment in four subclasses of the SF-36 score. Obviously, tissue regeneration, improvement in clinical scores, and improvement in patient's quality of life are achieved after implantation of polymer-based autologous cartilage grafts even in osteoarthritic conditions.
Currently, ACI is considered not to be indicated for osteoarthritic patients. In spite of this, many young patients suffer from early stages of osteoarthritis or display deformities predisposing to osteoarthritis that are idiopathic or follow trauma. These patients lack good treatment options and are too young for total joint replacement. This is particularly true for those having an active lifestyle that includes sports or demanding recreational activities. Most of the patients of the present study suffered preoperatively from pain or dysfunction of the knee joint. They frequently underwent several failed cartilage repair procedures, and subsequently had to endure massive restrictions of quality of life, ability to work, and sporting activities. Thus, we consider the outcome of this study as a promising result for the treatment of large cartilage lesions of the knee, particularly for this challenging patient cohort with difficult cartilage conditions and in need of a variety of concomitant surgery procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or high tibial osteotomy. Besides, as a first step, it would be a beneficial effort to postpone total joint replacement for a decade. Recently, the effectiveness of second-generation cartilage grafts has been shown for the treatment of osteoarthritic knees. Hollander and colleagues reported the use of a hyaluronan-based second-generation cartilage tissue engineering graft for the treatment of osteoarthritic knees . Histological and biochemical analyses of second-look biopsies documented the regeneration of cartilage as early as about 1 year after transplantation in 10 of 23 patients and showed that osteoarthritis did not inhibit the regeneration progress.
The present study supports the use of the three-dimensional autologous cartilage graft, BioSeed-C, for the treatment of posttraumatic and osteoarthritic cartilage defects of the knee. Clinical evaluation 2 years after implantation showed that the treatment of posttraumatic and osteoarthritic defects with BioSeed-C leads to an improvement in the patient's condition as documented by the significant improvement in reliable clinical outcome scores. Further long-term studies with more patients are needed to prove the effectiveness of tissue engineering cartilage grafts to postpone total joint replacement in osteoarthritis.
= autologous chondrocyte implantation
= International Knee Documentation Committee.
- Smith GD, Knutsen G, Richardson JB: A clinical review of cartilage repair techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005, 87: 445-449. 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15971.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L: Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994, 331: 889-895. 10.1056/NEJM199410063311401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hubbard MJ: Articular debridement versus washout for degeneration of the medial femoral condyle. A five-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996, 78: 217-219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsusue Y, Yamamuro T, Hama H: Arthroscopic multiple osteochondral transplantation to the chondral defect in the knee associated with anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Arthroscopy. 1993, 9: 318-321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ: Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001, (391 Suppl): S362-S369. 10.1097/00003086-200110001-00033.
- Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG: Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy. 1997, 13: 456-460.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nehrer S, Spector M, Minas T: Histologic analysis of tissue after failed cartilage repair procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999, 365: 149-162. 10.1097/00003086-199908000-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kreuz PC, Steinwachs MR, Erggelet C, Krause SJ, Konrad G, Uhl M, Sudkamp N: Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006, 29: 29-Google Scholar
- Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Sjogren-Jansson E, Lindahl A: Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000, 374: 212-234. 10.1097/00003086-200005000-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peterson L, Brittberg M, Kiviranta I, Akerlund EL, Lindahl A: Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability. Am J Sports Med. 2002, 30: 2-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minas T: Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the arthritic knee. Orthopedics. 2003, 26: 945-947.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Browne JE, Anderson AF, Arciero R, Mandelbaum B, Moseley JB, Micheli LJ, Fu F, Erggelet C: Clinical outcome of autologous chondrocyte implantation at 5 years in US subjects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005, 436: 237-245. 10.1097/00003086-200507000-00036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC, Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Solheim E, Strand T, Roberts S, Isaksen V, Johansen O: Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86-A: 455-464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henderson I, Francisco R, Oakes B, Cameron J: Autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of focal chondral defects of the knee – a clinical, arthroscopic, MRI and histologic evaluation at 2 years. Knee. 2005, 12: 209-216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gooding CR, Bartlett W, Bentley G, Skinner JA, Carrington R, Flanagan A: A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. Knee. 2006, 13: 203-210. 10.1016/j.knee.2006.02.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Driesang IM, Hunziker EB: Delamination rates of tissue flaps used in articular cartilage repair. J Orthop Res. 2000, 18: 909-911. 10.1002/jor.1100180609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Micheli LJ, Browne JE, Erggelet C, Fu F, Mandelbaum B, Moseley JB, Zurakowski D: Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: multicenter experience and minimum 3-year follow-up. Clin J Sport Med. 2001, 11: 223-228. 10.1097/00042752-200110000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minas T: Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001, 391 (Suppl): S349-S361. 10.1097/00003086-200110001-00032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcacci M, Berruto M, Brocchetta D, Delcogliano A, Ghinelli D, Gobbi A, Kon E, Pederzini L, Rosa D, Sacchetti GL, et al: Articular cartilage engineering with Hyalograft C: 3-year clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005, 435: 96-105. 10.1097/01.blo.0000165737.87628.5b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nehrer S, Domayer S, Dorotka R, Schatz K, Bindreiter U, Kotz R: Three-year clinical outcome after chondrocyte transplantation using a hyaluronan matrix for cartilage repair. Eur J Radiol. 2006, 57: 3-8. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartlett W, Skinner JA, Gooding CR, Carrington RW, Flanagan AM, Briggs TW, Bentley G: Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005, 87: 640-645. 10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Behrens P, Bitter T, Kurz B, Russlies M: Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI) – 5-year follow-up. Knee. 2006, 13: 194-202. 10.1016/j.knee.2006.02.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sittinger M, Hutmacher DW, Risbud MV: Current strategies for cell delivery in cartilage and bone regeneration. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2004, 15: 411-418. 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.08.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sittinger M, Bujia J, Minuth WW, Hammer C, Burmester GR: Engineering of cartilage tissue using bioresorbable polymer carriers in perfusion culture. Biomaterials. 1994, 15: 451-456. 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90224-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bujia J, Sittinger M, Minuth WW, Hammer C, Burmester G, Kastenbauer E: Engineering of cartilage tissue using bioresorbable polymer fleeces and perfusion culture. Acta Otolaryngol. 1995, 115: 307-310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaps C, Fuchs S, Endres M, Vetterlein S, Krenn V, Perka C, Sittinger M: Molecular characterization of tissue-engineered articular chondrocyte transplants based on resorbable polymer fleece. Orthopade. 2004, 33: 76-85. 10.1007/s00132-003-0505-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barnewitz D, Endres M, Kruger I, Becker A, Zimmermann J, Wilke I, Ringe J, Sittinger M, Kaps C: Treatment of articular cartilage defects in horses with polymer-based cartilage tissue engineering grafts. Biomaterials. 2006, 27: 2882-2889. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erggelet C, Sittinger M, Lahm A: The arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy. 2003, 19: 108-110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Outerbridge RE: The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961, 43-B: 752-757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaeger M, Wirth CJ: Praxis der Orthopädie. 1986, Stuttgart: Thieme, 1Google Scholar
- Scheller G, Sobau C, Bulow JU: Arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy in an otherwise normal knee: clinical, functional, and radiographic results of a long-term follow-up study. Arthroscopy. 2001, 17: 946-952.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS: Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957, 16: 494-502.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW: Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 1999, 27: 402-416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lysholm J, Gillquist J: Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982, 10: 150-154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998, 28: 88-96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD: Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001, 29: 600-613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fu FH, Zurakowski D, Browne JE, Mandelbaum B, Erggelet C, Moseley JB, Anderson AF, Micheli LJ: Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus debridement for treatment of full-thickness chondral defects of the knee: an observational cohort study with 3-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005, 33: 1658-1666. 10.1177/0363546505275148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaps C, Frauenschuh S, Endres M, Ringe J, Haisch A, Lauber J, Buer J, Krenn V, Haupl T, Burmester GR, Sittinger M: Gene expression profiling of human articular cartilage grafts generated by tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006, 27: 3617-3630.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drobnic M, Radosavljevic D, Ravnik D, Pavlovcic V, Hribernik M: Comparison of four techniques for the fixation of a collagen scaffold in the human cadaveric knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006, 14: 337-344. 10.1016/j.joca.2005.11.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knecht S, Erggelet C, Endres M, Sittinger M, Kaps C, Stussi E: Mechanical testing of fixation techniques for scaffold-based tissue-engineered grafts. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007, 22: Epub 2007 Feb 22Google Scholar
- Perka C, Sittinger M, Schultz O, Spitzer RS, Schlenzka D, Burmester GR: Tissue engineered cartilage repair using cryopreserved and noncryopreserved chondrocytes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000, 378: 245-254. 10.1097/00003086-200009000-00035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perka C, Schultz O, Sittinger M, Zippel H: Chondrocyte transplantation in PGLA/polydioxanone fleece. Orthopade. 2000, 29: 112-119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbolt TA, Odin M, Leger M, Kangas L, Hoiste J, Liu SH: Biocompatibility evaluation of dura mater substitutes in an animal model. Neurol Res. 2001, 23: 813-820. 10.1179/016164101101199405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rotter N, Aigner J, Naumann A, Planck H, Hammer C, Burmester G, Sittinger M: Cartilage reconstruction in head and neck surgery: comparison of resorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering of human septal cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998, 42: 347-356. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<347::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horas U, Schnettler R, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T: Osteochondral transplantation versus autogenous chondrocyte transplantation. A prospective comparative clinical study. Chirurg. 2000, 71: 1090-1097. 10.1007/s001040051184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RW, Akmal M, Goldberg A, Williams AM, Skinner JA, Pringle J: A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003, 85: 223-230. 10.1302/0301-620X.85B2.13543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R: Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A: 185-192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loehnert J, Ruhnau K, Gossen A, Bernsmann K, Wiese M: Autologe Chondrozytentransplantation (ACT) im Kniegelenk. Erste klinische Ergebnisse. Arthroskopie. 1999, 12: 34-42. 10.1007/s001420050068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Minas T, Peterson L: Advanced techniques in autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Clin Sports Med. 1999, 18: 13-44. 10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70128-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hollander AP, Dickinson SC, Sims TJ, Brun P, Cortivo R, Kon E, Marcacci M, Zanasi S, Borrione A, De Luca C, et al: Maturation of tissue engineered cartilage implanted in injured and osteoarthritic human knees. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12: 1787-1798. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1787.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.