Levels of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and IgM rheumatoid factor are not associated with outcome in early arthritis patients: a cohort study
© Ursum et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 17 July 2009
Accepted: 12 January 2010
Published: 12 January 2010
To investigate whether baseline levels of anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) or IgM rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) and changes in the year thereafter are associated with disease activity, functional and radiographic outcome in early arthritis patients, and provide additional information over baseline autoantibody status.
In 545 early arthritis patients ACPA and IgM-RF levels, disease activity (DAS28), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Sharp/Van der Heijde Score (SHS) were assessed annually. Baseline status, levels and first-year changes of the autoantibodies were associated with these measures at the two-year follow-up and sub-analysed according to autoantibody status.
The mean age was 52.7 years, 69% was female, at baseline 56% was ACPA positive, 47% IgM-RF positive. At the two-year follow-up the mean DAS28 was 2.88, and the median HAQ and SHS were 0.38 and 1, respectively. At one year, ACPA and IgM-RF levels had decreased by 31% and 56%, respectively. A switch from negative to positive occurred in 2% for ACPA and 3% for IgM-RF. Positive ACPA and RF status were both associated with SHS at two years (P < 0.001), but baseline levels only showed a minor correlation of ACPA with DAS28 and HAQ at two years. Level changes were not associated with the outcome parameters.
Baseline levels and first-year changes of ACPA and IgM-RF are hardly associated with outcome after two years. Seroconversion seldom occurs. Therefore, it does not appear useful to repeat ACPA or IgM-RF measurements.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is often accompanied by autoimmune phenomena, notably anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF). Although ACPA-positive RA cannot be distinguished from ACPA-negative RA at first presentation [1, 2], several studies have demonstrated that the presence of ACPA is prognostic for disease severity, radiographic erosions, as well as the development of RA in synovitis of recent onset [1, 3–8]. Recently, higher ACPA levels have been found in patients who developed RA compared with those who did not develop RA . Most studies assessed the predictive value of the presence of ACPA [3, 8, 10–15]. However, it is as yet unclear whether high levels of ACPA predict poorer outcome [16–20]. In a prospective study of 104 early RA patients, higher baseline ACPA levels were associated with erosive disease after two years . Another study of 99 early RA patients reported a small, almost significant correlation between baseline serum ACPA levels and radiographic progression after five years . A third study of 238 early RA patients found a higher radiographic progression rate after 10 years of high-positive ACPA versus low-positive ACPA patient groups .
Two studies assessed levels of ACPA in patients with longstanding RA. One of these reported a weak association (in 180 patients) between ACPA levels and radiographic progression rate . The other was a cross-sectional study of 241 RA patients with a mean disease duration of 8.6 years, in which mean ACPA levels were similar in patients with or without erosions .
RF, mostly measured as immunoglobulin (Ig)M-RF, is still widely used as a serological marker for the diagnosis of RA, although it is also frequently observed in other inflammatory diseases  and in healthy elderly persons  suggesting that RF can be a consequence of nonspecific immune activation. Its presence is a prognostic marker of disease activity and erosive disease [10, 20]. Higher IgM-RF levels have been associated with a higher risk for the development of RA. IgM-RF levels also seem to be associated with future radiographic damage: in three studies, in which 78 to 149 early RA patients participated, a correlation was found between baseline IgM-RF levels and radiographic damage after two to three years [20, 24, 25].
Reports of ACPA or IgM-RF levels and outcome in early arthritis are therefore still few and to our knowledge no data are available on changes in levels of ACPA or IgM-RF as a predictor of disease outcome. Changes in autoantibody levels could possibly serve as markers of response to therapy and thus be related to outcome. Therefore, we investigated whether baseline status or levels of ACPA or IgM-RF and their changes in the year thereafter are associated with disease activity, functional and radiographic outcome in a large group of early arthritis patients, and whether analysis of levels provides additional information over baseline antibody status.
Materials and methods
The early arthritis cohort at the Jan van Breemen Institute, a large rheumatology clinic in Amsterdam, has been described previously . The cohort consists of patients aged older than 18 years with peripheral arthritis of two or more joints and a symptom duration of less than three years, who were referred from 1995 onwards. Patients who were previously treated with a disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) and those with spondylarthropathy, reactive arthritis, crystal-induced arthropathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, or osteoarthritis were excluded. The study was approved by the local medical ethics committee and all patients gave written informed consent to be included in the study. For the present analysis, all patients with available ACPA and IgM-RF data at baseline and after one year, and available outcome measures at two-years follow up were included.
ACPA levels were measured as anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (second generation anti-CCP ELISA, Axis Shield, Dundee, UK). The anti-CCP test was performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer with a cut-off level for positivity set at 5 Arbitrary Units (AU)/ml. The day to day variation (CV) was 7.4% (n = 98). Anti-CCP levels in sera reaching 1000 AU were not further diluted. IgM-RF was measured by in-house ELISA as described previously . The cut-off level for IgM-RF antibody positivity is set at 30 IU determined on the basis of receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves described previously .
Disease activity was assessed with the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) . Functional status was measured by the validated Dutch version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) . Radiographic damage was assessed with the Sharp/Van der Heijde Score (SHS) by one experienced rheumatologist, who was blinded to the other variables. Two rheumatologists, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95, each performed part of the scoring.
The baseline characteristics were age, sex, symptom duration, percentage of patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for RA and the percentage IgM-RF and ACPA positivity were compared between those patients included in the study (n = 545) and those excluded (n = 1309). The change in ACPA level was calculated as an absolute change and as a relative change compared with baseline. Outcome measures at the two-year follow up were DAS28, HAQ and SHS, all used as continuous variables.
Differences between groups with positive or negative autoantibody status were tested using Mann-Whitney U test or the chi-squared test. Correlations were determined by Pearson rho or Spearman rho as appropriate. Partial correlations were used to correct for baseline values. For an association between change in ACPA level and dichotomous variables, logistic regression analysis was used. Subanalyses were performed for positive and negative autoantibody status at baseline. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
In the study, 545 patients were included, with a mean age of 53 years, 69% was female. Sixty-three percent fulfilled the ACR criteria for RA at baseline or after one year. At baseline, 56% was ACPA positive and 47% was IgM-RF positive. At the two-year follow up the mean (standard deviation) DAS28 was 2.88 (1.27), the median (interquartile range (IQR)) HAQ was 0.38 (0 to 0.8) and the median (IQR) SHS was 1 (0 to 6). At two years the median (IQR) number of DMARD used was 2 (1 to 3); 27% of the patients had used hydroxychloroquine, 39% sulphasalazine, 80% methotrexate and 25% prednisone, sometimes in combination, while 2% had not used any DMARD.
Autoantibodies: change in status and levels between baseline and one year
The relation between ACPA status and levels and outcome variables
Correlation of ACPA levels at baseline
ACPA positive at baseline (n = 304)
ACPA negative at baseline (n = 241)
ACPA level at baseline (AU/ml), median (IQR)
ACPA level at 1 year (AU/ml), median (IQR)
DAS28 at baseline
HAQ at baseline
SHS at baseline
DAS28 at 2-year follow up
HAQ at 2-year follow up
SHS at 2-year follow up
Median IgM-RF levels had decreased after one year to 72% (P < 0.001) of the baseline levels. Higher baseline levels were associated with larger absolute as well as relative changes (r = -0.71 and -0.54, respectively, both P < 0.001). Also this decrease was mainly caused by IgM-RF-positive patients; in this subgroup the median (IQR) IgM-RF level decreased significantly, equalling 44% (27 to 71%) of the baseline value (Table 1). Of the IgM-RF-positive patients at baseline, 35% became negative for IgM-RF after one year of follow up. In IgM-RF-negative patients, 3% became positive for IgM-RF after one year of follow up.
Baseline autoantibody levels and status, and outcome
Outcome parameters at baseline
The relation between IgM-RF status and levels and outcome variables
Correlation of IgM-RF levels at baseline#
IgM-RF positive at baseline (n = 255)$
IgM-RF negative at baseline (n = 280)$
IgM-RF level at baseline (IU/ml), median (IQR)
IgM-RF level at 1 year (IU/ml), median (IQR)
DAS28 at baseline
HAQ at baseline
SHS at baseline
DAS28 at 2-year follow-up
HAQ at 2-year follow-up
SHS at 2-year follow-up
Outcome parameters at two years
Baseline ACPA and IgM-RF levels were not correlated with DAS28 or HAQ at the two-year follow up. Levels were only correlated with SHS (r = 0.2 and r = 0.22, respectively, both P = 0.01). When correcting for baseline SHS only the correlation between IgM-RF levels and SHS remained (r = 0.14, P = 0.002).
Patients positive for ACPA or IgM-RF at baseline had at median more radiographic damage at the two-year follow up compared with those negative for ACPA of IgM-RF at baseline (Tables 1 and 2). However, mean DAS28 and median HAQ at the two-year follow up did not differ between patients with positive or negative autoantibody status.
In the subgroup of ACPA-positive patients, baseline ACPA levels were modestly correlated only with DAS28 and HAQ at the two-year follow up (r = 0.15 and r = 0.13, respectively, both P < 0.05), while no correlation was found with SHS (r = -0.04, P = 0.54). When correcting for baseline DAS or baseline HAQ, these correlations were no longer present.
In the subgroup of patients with a positive IgM-RF status at baseline there was no correlation between IgM-RF levels and SHS (r = 0.05, P = 0.38).
Change in autoantibody levels and outcome
First-year change in levels and outcome at two year follow-up
The well-known association between ACPA or RF status and radiographic outcome was confirmed in the present study. Therefore, we focussed on ACPA and IgM-RF levels at baseline and changes in the year thereafter in relation to outcome at two years, to investigate whether this would provide additional prognostic information in early arthritis patients.
The results were that baseline levels were only marginally associated with later radiographic damage. The first-year change in IgM-RF levels was modestly associated with SHS at the two-year follow up; however, this association was lost in the subgroup of patients with a positive baseline status.
It was also noted that ACPA and RF rarely switched from negative to positive after one year: in 2 and 3%, respectively. On the other hand, decreases in levels over the first year occurred in the majority of patients, with a median decrease in level of 22% for ACPA and 28% for RF. Recently, another study in very early RA patients reported an increase of ACPA levels of 10% and a decrease of IgM-RF levels of 14% . The marked decrease found in the present study is probably due to treatment, because it is similar to what has been found in reaction to TNF-blocking therapy in established RA . The differential decrease supports the notion that RF is more a disease activity marker and ACPA more a disease-specific marker [31, 32].
At baseline, ACPA levels and status were associated only with SHS at baseline, while IgM-RF levels and status were associated with DAS28 and SHS at baseline, as was also reported previously [20, 30]. For the two-year outcome, there was only a correlation between baseline autoantibody levels and SHS, as had been found before [18, 20, 24, 30], although most studies [3, 8, 10–15] only addressed autoantibody status. High autoantibody levels at baseline seem to be modestly associated with future radiographic damage. However, in the present study these associations were lost when stratifying for autoantibody status. Previous studies did not analyse separately according to autoantibody status. Therefore, their results could be a reflection of autoantibody status.
The present results show that changes in ACPA level during the first year of follow up are not correlated to the outcome at two years, while there was a weak but negative correlation in the first-year change in IgM-RF levels and SHS at two years. One earlier study reported the absence of a relation between changes in antibody levels and changes in disease activity in the same time period . We are not aware of any study reporting changes in levels as a predictor for outcome later in the disease course.
In conclusion, measurement of ACPA or RF levels in the first year in early arthritis patients does not provide additional information over autoantibody status at baseline in the prediction of the outcome after two years. As seroconversion of autoantibody status after one year is rare, except for downward seroconversion of IgM-RF, it does not seem useful in general to repeat these tests. It is more the presence than the levels of the autoantibodies that counts.
anti-citrullinated protein antibody
American College of Rheumatology
cyclic citrullinated peptide
Disease Activity Score on 28 joints
disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Health Assessment Score
receiver operator characteristic
Sharp/Van der Heijde Score
tumor necrosis factor.
We would like to thank E. de Wit-Taen and V. van de Lugt for collecting patient data.
- Helm-van Mil van der AH, Verpoort KN, Breedveld FC, Toes RE, Huizinga TW: Antibodies to citrullinated proteins and differences in clinical progression of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005, 7: R949-R958. 10.1186/ar1767. doi:10.1186/ar1767PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rönnelid J, Wick MC, Lampa J, Lindblad S, Nordmark B, Klareskog L, van Vollenhoven RF: Longitudinal analysis of citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (anti-CP) during 5 year follow up in early rheumatoid arthritis: anti-CP status predicts worse disease activity and greater radiological progression. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005, 64: 1744-1749. 10.1136/ard.2004.033571.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer O, Labarre C, Dougados M, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Dubois A, Nicaise-Roland P, Sibilia J, Combe B: Anticitrullinated protein/peptide antibody assays in early rheumatoid arthritis for predicting five year radiographic damage. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003, 62: 120-126. 10.1136/ard.62.2.120.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B: Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP). Ann Rheum Dis. 2004, 63: 1090-1095. 10.1136/ard.2003.014233.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kastbom A, Strandberg G, Lindroos A, Skogh T: Anti-CCP antibody test predicts the disease course during 3 years in early rheumatoid arthritis (the Swedish TIRA project). Ann Rheum Dis. 2004, 63: 1085-1089. 10.1136/ard.2003.016808.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindqvist E, Eberhardt K, Bendtzen K, Heinegard D, Saxne T: Prognostic laboratory markers of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005, 64: 196-201. 10.1136/ard.2003.019992.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berglin E, Johansson T, Sundin U, Jidell E, Wadell G, Hallmans G, Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S: Radiological outcome in rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by presence of antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide before and at disease onset, and by IgA-RF at disease onset. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006, 65: 453-458. 10.1136/ard.2005.041376.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Machold KP, Stamm TA, Nell VP, Pflugbeil S, Aletaha D, Steiner G, Uffmann M, Smolen JS: Very recent onset rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and serological patient characteristics associated with radiographic progression over the first years of disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007, 46: 342-349. 10.1093/rheumatology/kel237.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bos WH, Wolbink GJ, Boers M, Tijhuis GJ, de Vries N, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Tak PP, van de Stadt R, van der Laken CJ, Dijkmans BA, van Schaardenburg D: Arthritis development in arthralgia patients is strongly associated with anti-citrullinated protein antibody status: a prospective cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009,Google Scholar
- Agrawal S, Misra R, Aggarwal A: Autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: association with severity of disease in established RA. Clin Rheumatol. 2007, 26: 201-204. 10.1007/s10067-006-0275-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Del Val Del Amo N, Ibanez BR, Fito MC, Gutierrez PR, Loza CE: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in rheumatoid arthritis: relation with disease aggressiveness. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006, 24: 281-286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jansen LM, van Schaardenburg D, van dH-BI, Stadt van der RJ, de Koning MH, Dijkmans BA: The predictive value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in early arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003, 30: 1691-1695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karlson EW, Chibnik LB, Cui J, Plenge RM, Glass RJ, Maher NE, Parker A, Roubenoff R, Izmailova E, Coblyn JS, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA: Associations between human leukocyte antigen, PTPN22, CTLA4 genotypes and rheumatoid arthritis phenotypes of autoantibody status, age at diagnosis and erosions in a large cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008, 67: 358-363. 10.1136/ard.2007.071662.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kroot EJ, de Jong BA, van Leeuwen MA, Swinkels H, Hoogen van den FH, van't Hof M, Putte van de LB, van Rijswijk MH, van Venrooij WJ, van Riel PL: The prognostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43: 1831-1835. 10.1002/1529-0131(200008)43:8<1831::AID-ANR19>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shovman O, Gilburd B, Zandman-Goddard G, Sherer Y, Orbach H, Gerli R, Shoenfeld Y: The diagnostic utility of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, matrix metalloproteinase-3, rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein in patients with erosive and non-erosive rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2005, 12: 197-202. 10.1080/17402520500233510.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Rycke L, Peene I, Hoffman IE, Kruithof E, Union A, Meheus L, Lebeer K, Wyns B, Vincent C, Mielants H, Boullart L, Serre G, Veys EM, De Keyser F: Rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: diagnostic value, associations with radiological progression rate, and extra-articular manifestations. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004, 63: 1587-1593. 10.1136/ard.2003.017574.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee DM, Phillips R, Hagan EM, Chibnik LB, Costenbader KH MM, Schur PH: Quantifying anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide titres: clinical utility and association with tobacco exposure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 201-208. 10.1136/ard.2007.084509. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.084509 [Published Online First: 7 April 2008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer O, Nicaise-Roland P, Santos MD, Labarre C, Dougados M, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Sibilia J, Combe B: Serial determination of cyclic citrullinated peptide autoantibodies predicted five-year radiological outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006, 8: R40-10.1186/ar1896. doi:10.1186/ar1896PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Syversen SW, Gaarder PI, Goll GL, Odegard S, Haavardsholm EA, Mowinckel P, van Der HD, Landewe R, Kvien TK: High anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide levels and an algorithm of four variables predict radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a 10-year longitudinal study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008, 67: 212-217. 10.1136/ard.2006.068247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vencovsky J, Machacek S, Sedova L, Kafkova J, Gatterova J, Pesakova V, Ruzickova S: Autoantibodies can be prognostic markers of an erosive disease in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003, 62: 427-430. 10.1136/ard.62.5.427.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dorner T, Egerer K, Feist E, Burmester GR: Rheumatoid factor revisited. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004, 16: 246-253. 10.1097/00002281-200405000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Schaardenburg D, Lagaay AM, Otten HG, Breedveld FC: The relation between class-specific serum rheumatoid factors and age in the general population. Br J Rheumatol. 1993, 32: 546-549. 10.1093/rheumatology/32.7.546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- del Puente A, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH: The incidence of rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by rheumatoid factor titer in a longitudinal population study. Arthritis Rheum. 1988, 31: 1239-1244. 10.1002/art.1780311004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paimela L, Palosuo T, Leirisalo-Repo M, Helve T, Aho K: Prognostic value of quantitative measurement of rheumatoid factor in early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1995, 34: 1146-1150. 10.1093/rheumatology/34.12.1146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Leeuwen MA, Westra J, van Riel PL, Limburg PC, van Rijswijk MH: IgM, IgA, and IgG rheumatoid factors in early rheumatoid arthritis predictive of radiological progression?. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995, 24: 146-153. 10.3109/03009749509099303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielen MM, Horst van der AR, van Schaardenburg D, Horst-Bruinsma van der IE, Stadt van de RJ, Aarden L, Dijkmans BA, Hamann D: Antibodies to citrullinated human fibrinogen (ACF) have diagnostic and prognostic value in early arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005, 64: 1199-1204. 10.1136/ard.2004.029389.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielen MM, van Schaardenburg D, Reesink HW, Stadt van de RJ, Horst-Bruinsma van der IE, de Koning MH, Habibuw MR, Vandenbroucke JP, Dijkmans BA: Specific autoantibodies precede the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: a study of serial measurements in blood donors. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50: 380-386. 10.1002/art.20018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fransen J, van Riel PL: DAS remission cut points. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006, 24: S29-S32.Google Scholar
- Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR: Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980, 23: 137-145. 10.1002/art.1780230202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nell-Duxneuner V, Machold K, Stamm T, Eberl G, Heinzl H, Hoefler E, Smolen JS, Steiner G: Autoantibody profiling in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis: a follow-up study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 69: 169-174.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bos WH, Bartelds GM, Wolbink GJ, de Koning MH, Stadt van de RJ, van Schaardenburg D, Dijkmans BA, Nurmohamed MT: Differential response of the rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies during adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008, 35: 1972-1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ursum J, Bos WH, Stadt van de RJ, Dijkmans BA, van Schaardenburg D: Different properties of ACPA and IgM-RF derived from a large dataset: further evidence of two distinct autoantibody systems. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009, 11: R75-10.1186/ar2704.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.