Update on peripheral mechanisms of pain: beyond prostaglandins and cytokines
© BioMed Central Ltd 2011
Published: 28 April 2011
Skip to main content
© BioMed Central Ltd 2011
Published: 28 April 2011
The peripheral nociceptor is an important target of pain therapy because many pathological conditions such as inflammation excite and sensitize peripheral nociceptors. Numerous ion channels and receptors for inflammatory mediators were identified in nociceptors that are involved in neuronal excitation and sensitization, and new targets, beyond prostaglandins and cytokines, emerged for pain therapy. This review addresses mechanisms of nociception and focuses on molecules that are currently favored as new targets in drug development or that are already targeted by new compounds at the stage of clinical trials - namely the transient receptor potential V1 receptor, nerve growth factor, and voltage-gated sodium channels - or both.
Pain research substantially amplifies our understanding of the nature and mechanisms of pain, and this area is still expanding. We have learned that different forms of pain can be distinguished according to their pathogenesis (for example, nociceptive versus neuropathic pain) (see the following section), and we are beginning to decipher the molecular mechanisms involved in different types of pain. Importantly, this research provided new targets for pain treatment, and different classes of compounds that are effective against pain in animal models and that are now being tested in humans in different phases of clinical trials have emerged. The two main challenges are the efficacy(are the new drugs better than the old ones?) and the side effects (are they less dangerous than the old ones?). The need for better treatment of pain is evident because worldwide about 20% of adults suffer from chronic pain [1, 2]. In these patients, the current pain therapy is either not applicable for different reasons (for example, side effects) or not sufficient . In this review, the focus will be on molecular targets which are currently favored in drug development and for which respective compounds are at different stages of clinical trials.
It is important to note that pain has different facets. In normal tissue, pain is elicited by high-energy stimuli that potentially or actually damage the tissue (noxious stimuli). This 'physiological nociceptive pain' is a warning sensation and absolutely essential for survival because it triggers adequate avoidance reactions. Pain treatment must not impair this type of pain. On the other hand, pain is an important symptom of disease, and this pain has to be treated because it impairs normal life . The pain elicited by inflammation or injury of an organ is called 'pathophysiological nociceptive pain'. This pain is typically elicited by low-energy stimuli that are normally innocuous and not painful. It appears as allodynia (occurrence of pain upon an innocuous stimulus) or hyperalgesia (more pain during the application of noxious stimuli) or both, and resting pain (in the absence of any intentional stimulation) may also occur. Pathophysiological nociceptive pain results from the sensitization of the pain system (see the following section), and the interference with the mechanisms of sensitization provides the opportunity of treatment without eliminating the physiological nociceptive pain [2, 3]. Initially, this pain is beneficial because it indicates the presence of disease and triggers measures for the support of healing (cancer is so dangerous because it does not cause pain in its early stage). However, chronic pain, in particular, creates severe suffering .
Whereas 'nociceptive pain' results from noxious stimulation or inflammation/injury of tissue, 'neuropathic pain' is evoked by damage to the neurons of the nociceptive system themselves. Causes include nerve damage, metabolic diseases (for example, diabetes mellitus), and herpes zoster. Neuropathic pain does not primarily signal noxious tissue stimulation, often feels abnormal (burning or electrical character), and can be persistent or occur in short episodes (for example, trigeminal neuralgia). It may be combined with hyperalgesia and allodynia or with sensory loss [2, 3]. This pain requires treatment that is, however, often not sufficient. Its mechanisms differ in part from those of nociceptive pain.
Inflammation sensitizes polymodal nociceptors. Their excitation threshold drops such that even light, normally innocuous stimuli activate the fibers, and noxious stimuli evoke stronger responses than in the non-sensitized state. In addition, inflammation recruits so-called silent nociceptors for activation [2, 3, 7]. These C-fibers are inexcitable by noxious mechanical or thermal stimuli in normal tissue but inflammation sensitizes them to become responsive to stimuli. This 'peripheral sensitization' induces a hyper-excitability of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system ('central sensitization'), and the two together generate the features of pathophysiological nociceptive pain, namely allodynia and hyperalgesia [2, 8, 9]. Peripheral sensitization is induced by inflammatory mediators that change the response properties of ion channels through the activation of second messenger systems (Figure 1).
The pathophysiology of neuropathic pain is different. While in healthy sensory nerve fibers action potentials are generated in the sensory endings upon stimulation of the receptive field, damaged nerve fi bers (including non-nociceptive Aβ-fibers ) often show pathological ectopic discharges that are generated at the site of nerve injury or in the cell body in dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) [3, 11]. Neuropathic pain may also be generated by intact nerve fibers in the vicinity of injured nerve fibers . Ectopic discharges are thought to be produced by changes in the expression of ion channels , pathological activation of axons by inflammatory mediators , and pathological activation of injured nerve fibers by the sympathetic nervous system .
However, the question of whether there is always a strict distinction between these types of pain under clinical conditions arises. For example, osteoarthritic pain is considered mainly a pathophysiological nociceptive pain because the joints may show severe damage and inflammation . However, changes that are typical for neuropathic conditions may occur in the nervous system . Possibly, pain types become less discernible with time.
Another emerging aspect of pain is that significant differences between the nociceptive innervation and processes in different tissues exist. First, the skin is innervated by two large populations of nociceptors, namely peptidergic (containing substance P and CGRP) and non-peptidergic IB4 (isolectin B4)-positive nociceptive aerents [2, 5], whereas the vast majority of aerents in the musculoskeletal system are peptidergic [18, 19]. Second, nociceptors in skin and musculoskeletal system have relatively high mechanical thresholds that clearly distinguish them from non-nociceptive low-threshold sensory fibers [20, 21], whereas most putative nociceptors in the viscera have their excitation threshold in the innocuous range . Third, during inflammation, nociceptors in the muscle and joint are strongly sensitized to mechanical stimuli whereas cutaneous nociceptors are rather sensitized to thermal stimuli [20, 21, 23]. These differences, often ignored, may have a significant impact on drug development. Although there is an overlap of nociceptive mechanisms in different tissues, the awareness of tissue-specific nociceptive mechanisms may become more important in the future . Notably, most chronic pain occurs during diseases of the musculoskeletal system whereas skin diseases are rarely painful .
The identification of these mechanisms is based on different experimental approaches. Electrophysiological and behavioral experiments in the intact organism are used to study nociceptive processes in situ. However, the sensory free nerve endings themselves cannot be accessed in situ for recordings, because they are extremely small and embedded in the tissue. Fortunately, the more accessible somata of the nociceptors in the DRGs also express the relevant molecules. Therefore, patch clamp recordings are usually carried out in cultured DRG neurons, although subtle differences between the cell body and the endings in the tissue might exist . Pain research aims to achieve convergent information from behavioral experiments in vivo (for example, in wild-type and knockout animals), invasive experiments in situ, and experiments in cultured neurons.
As mentioned, the excitation of nociceptor endings is produced by ion channels in the membrane which open upon the impact of physical stimuli to the membrane. The cation influx through these channels produces a local depolarization, the sensor potential. Once the ending is sufficiently depolarized by the influx of cations, voltage-gated Na+ channels are opened and action potentials are triggered (Figure 1). K+ and Ca2+ channels control excitability of the neurons. During the process of sensitization, the gating properties of ion channels are modified by inflammatory mediators that act on metabotropic membrane receptors and activate second messenger systems . Inflammatory mediators may also evoke neuropathic ectopic discharges . Depending on the mediator, the sensitization of nociceptors can be induced within minutes (for example, by phosphorylation of ion channels in the membrane) or hours [23, 26, 27]. In the long term, the expression of receptors and ion channels may be regulated such that more molecules are available for stimulation . These changes may be induced by inflammatory mediators such as cytokines [28, 29] and nerve growth factor (NGF) . The following paragraphs address ion channels and receptors that were and are a major focus of pain research and some of them are the focus of drug development.
A lot of effort is put into the development of antagonists against the transient receptor potential V1 (TRPV1) receptor, and it is hoped that these antagonists become new analgesics. In fact, clinical trials are under way. Why is there so much interest in the TRPV1 receptor? In the last 10 to 15 years, the TRPV1 receptor was one of the hot topics in pain research and is now considered one of the key molecules in nociception [2, 5]. The TRPV1 receptor is a ligand-gated ion channel. Upon opening, cations (in particular, Ca2+) flow into the cell and depolarize it. Importantly, the TRPV1 receptor is expressed in nociceptors but not in other peripheral neurons ; that is, antagonists may selectively act on nociceptive neurons and not on other ones. Stimuli that open the TRPV1 receptor are manifold. First, it is opened by temperatures of higher than 43°C, which are felt as painful heat by humans. TRPV1-deficient mice show attenuated responses to heat stimuli  but other molecules seem to contribute to noxious heat sensations as well . Second, TRPV1 is opened by chemicals (such as capsaicin and ethanol applied to a wound) that elicit burning pain [30, 31]. However, the main interest for analgesic therapy comes from the findings that the channel characteristics are modified by metabolites that occur in inflamed tissue. In fact, the TRPV1 is opened by low pH (<5.9) occurring in inflamed tissue and is activated by arachidonic acid metabolites produced by lipoxygenases such as 12-hydroperoxyeicosaenoic acid (12-HPETE) and by endocannabinoids such as anandamide and NADA (N-arachidonyl-dopamine) . Further-more, TRPV1 is indirectly sensitized, via second messengers, by the inflammatory mediators bradykinin, prosta-glandin E2, extracellular ATP, glutamate, proteases, and NGF [25, 27, 30, 31]. Cellularly, sensitization may be produced by the increase of TRPV1 expression level in the membrane, the phosphorylation by protein kinases, and the release of inhibition of TRPV1 by phosphatidyl-inositol-4,5-biphosphate . The important consequence of this sensitization is that the threshold for opening by temperature stimuli drops such that normal body temperature may be sufficient to activate nociceptors and to elicit action potentials. This form of hyperalgesia is tested by thermal stimuli; in fact, TRPV1-deficient mice do not show the typical inflammation-evoked thermal hyperalgesia in acute carrageenan- or complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced inflammation [30, 31].
However, there are some caveats that may limit the success of TRPV1 antagonists. First, in humans, inflammatory pain appears mainly as mechanical hyperalgesia (that is, the sensitization of the nociceptive system toward mechanical stimulation) [2, 3]. The initial data showed that TRPV1-deficient mice exhibit normal responses to noxious mechanical stimuli and that inflammation-evoked mechanical hypersensitivity is not reduced . Thus, TRPV1 was classified as a key molecule for thermal hyperalgesia but not for mechanical hyperalgesia . Only recently, an involvement of TRPV1 in mechanical hyperalgesia was reported in adjuvant-induced chronic arthritis . It is still unclear, therefore, whether TRPV1 receptor antagonists will be efficient against significant mechanical hyperalgesia (for example, during osteoarthritis). Second, the role of TRPV1 receptors in neuropathic pain is not well understood. While it was proposed that TRPV1 receptors are important in the generation of chemical and thermal hyperalgesia in neuropathy, even a protective role of TRPV1 against the development of mechanical hyperalgesia was observed . Thus, the presence of a neuropathic pain component could spoil the success of TRPV1 receptor antagonists.
Sensory neurons also express other TRP receptors that can be colocalized with TRPV1. The functional significance of other TRPV receptors is much more uncertain or even confusing. Therefore, they are currently not considered targets for antinociceptive therapy, although they might be involved in aspects of nociception [25, 31]. The TRPV2 receptor is activated by high temperature (threshold of about 52°C) and may be the heat sensor in high-threshold-temperature Aδ nociceptors. TRPV2 and TRPV1 are colocalized in a very small percentage of DRG neurons . TRPV3 is activated by innocuous temperature stimuli in the range of 31°C to 39°C but shows increased responses to noxious thermal stimuli and may contribute to pain hypersensitivity during inflammation. It can be colocalized with the TRPV1 receptor . TRPV4 is activated by innocuous warmth with a threshold of greater than 27°C. Some data suggest that TRPV4 may, in fact, play a role in the transduction of mechanical stimuli and in mechanical hyperalgesia following exposure to inflammatory mediators . The transient receptor potential A1 (TRPA1) was initially considered the transduction molecule for noxious cold stimuli because its activation threshold is below 18°C  (this skin temperature may feel painful), but there is no consensus whether TRPA1 is really a noxious cold sensor [5, 33]. The transient receptor potential M8 (TRPM8) receptor is activated in the range of 23°C to 28°C and is also activated by cooling compounds such as menthol, eucalyptol, and icilin . It is assumed that this particular TRP receptor might be the receptor for the sensation 'cool' (not painful) in non-nociceptive nerve fibers; in fact, TRPM8 is rarely colocalized with the other TRP receptors.
The involvement of other TRP receptors in nociception is suggested by their sensitivity to irritant mediators or mediators involved in inflammation or by the fact that they are upregulated under inflammatory conditions or by both. TRPV2 is upregulated in DRG neurons after intra-plantar injection of CFA . TRPV3 shows responses to camphor and other irritants, nitric oxide (NO), and arachidonic acid and other fatty acids . TRPV4 is activated by phorbolester, low pH, citrate, endocannabinoids, arachidonic acid metabolites, and NO . TRPA1 is activated by bradykinin and by pungent ingredients of mustard oil, garlic, and others, all of which induce an acute painful burning or pricking sensation .
It should be noted that TRP receptors are not confined to peripheral sensory neurons. They are also detected in the central nervous system and even in non-neuronal tissue. For example, TRPV4 is expressed in cochlear hair cells, and both TRPV3 and TRPV4 are expressed in keratinocytes [30, 31]. Whether this restricts or prevents the usage of TRP antagonists as analgesic remains to be seen.
Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are members of the ENa/degenerin family of highly selective Na+ channels. They are expressed in numerous DRG neurons . ASICs are activated by low extracellular pH and thus are important sensors of tissue acidosis, which often occurs during inflammation. Several isoforms of ASICs were reported . Perhaps ASICs are most important in the skeletal muscle and heart, in which impaired circulation causes immediate pain [5, 34].
In some tissues, extracellular ATP is thought to act as a pain mediator. ATP opens purinergic receptors (P2X2 and P2X3) which are ligand-gated Ca2+ channels. ATP can be released from damaged cells or from keratinocytes of the inflamed skin . Like protons, ATP may be particularly important in contracting muscles . The Ca2+ influx depolarizes cells and causes secondary Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. P2X activation was implicated in the development of inflammatory hyperalgesia .
Voltage-gated Na+ channels are essential for the generation and conductance of action potentials. The analgesic effect of local anesthetics is due to their ability to block voltage-gated Na+ channels and thus to prevent the conduction of action potentials. Because local anesthetics block Na+ channels in all nerve fibers (including motoneurons, touch receptors, and thermoreceptors), their long-term use for pain treatment is not feasible. However, recent research revealed that different types of Na+ channels exist and that some of them are particularly expressed in nociceptive neurons. Therefore, a lot of effort is put into research on Na+ channels and their putative utilization for pain treatment.
Nociceptive neurons express mainly Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9, whereas large-sized non-nociceptive DRG neurons express mainly Nav1.1, Nav1.6, and Nav1.7 and some Nav1.8 [2, 35]. Nav1.1, Nav1.6, and Nav1.7 can be blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX) and are called TTX-sensitive (TTX-S), whereas Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 are TTX-resistant (TTX-R). Na+ influx into the neuron through TTX-S Na+ channels activates and inactivates very quickly, and Na+ influx through TTX-R Na+ channels activates and inactivates more slowly. Most likely, conduction of action potentials in the axons of primary afferents rests mainly on TTX-S Na+ channels, whereas TTX-R Na+ currents are important in the action potential generation in the sensory endings and the cell bodies . The channels are up- or downregulated by second messenger pathways involving protein kinase A, protein kinase C, sphingomyelinase, calmodulin, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase .
The resting potential of DRG neurons is about -60 mV. Nav1.7 opens after small depolarizations (at -50 to -40 mV), and this initial Na+ influx brings the neuron closer to the membrane potential for elicitation of an action potential . Nav1.8, which is expressed only in sensory neurons and largely restricted to nociceptive neurons, opens at -30 to -20 mV - that is, when the cell has been pre-depolarized (for example, by Nav1.7) - and provides about 80% of the inward current of the upstroke of the action potentials in DRG neurons. In particular, this Na + channel is targeted primarily to terminals and the cell body, suggesting a role in action potential initiation at the sensory terminal of nociceptors . It also mediates repetitive action potentials during persistent membrane depolarization (for example, in the presence of inflammatory mediators) . While Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 are directly involved in the generation of the action potential, Nav1.9 influences the threshold for action potentials. The channel opens around -60 mV and conducts persistent Na+ currents at subthreshold voltages for action potential firing and thus regulates the distance between membrane potential and threshold; it does not contribute to the upstroke of the action potential .
The critical importance of these Na+ channels in nociception is obvious from numerous findings. A gain-of-function mutation and a loss-of-function mutation of Nav1.7 channel in humans directly demonstrated the involvement of Nav1.7 current in pain perception . During inflammation, Nav1.7 channel mRNA and protein are increased, and in mice with Nav1.7 deletion, inflammatory hypersensitivity is either absent or dramatically attenuated . Nav1.8 current is increased by proinflammatory mediators such as adenosine, endothelin, NGF, prostaglandin E2, serotonin, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) . Antisense knockdown of Nav1.8 attenuates the development and maintenance of inflammatory hyperalgesia and can also prevent and reverse hypersensitivity observed following traumatic nerve injury . Nav1.9 is also potentiated by inflammatory mediators .
The excitability of neurons may also be controlled by K+ channels (for example, of the potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT [KCNQ] family) and Ca2+ channels. Excitability is increased when voltage-gated K+ channels are inhibited (this evokes sustained depolarization of neurons) or when Ca2+ flows into the neuron through voltage-gated T-type channels .
Figure 1 schematically shows receptors for classes of inflammatory mediators without addressing all mediators and receptor subtypes in detail (this is beyond the scope of this review). It should be noted that not all of the receptors are located in all neurons. Instead, only subpopulations of neurons respond to certain mediators, but the nociceptive system as a whole is responsive to all of the mediators indicated.
'Classical inflammatory mediators' such as bradykinin and prostaglandins [5, 27, 38] activate or sensitize neurons (or both) within minutes. For example, prostaglandin E2 acts on G protein-coupled prostaglandin E receptors that increase cAMP. This activates protein kinase A, which finally leads to a phosphorylation of TRPV1 receptors and voltage-gated Na+ currents. The importance of this sensitizing mechanism is underscored by the ability of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors to reduce sensitization. More recent research showed that cytokines can induce long-lasting effects on the excitability and also produce prolonged effects such as regulation of receptor expression [28, 29]. In this context, it may be important that, in the acute phase of inflammation, macrophages invade the DRGs of the segments that innervate the inflamed organ; that is, macrophages may directly influence the cell bodies . The blockade of TNF-α signaling was found to reduce inflammatory hyperalgesia, at least in part by a neuronal target [28, 39, 40].
A highly favored target for new drugs is NGF, and recent clinical studies using an antibody against NGF entered phase III  (with a set back, however, because the US Food and Drug Administration put a halt to some studies). Why is NGF a hot target? First, NGF is an essential growth factor for the development of normal nociceptors. In the adult, a large proportion of nociceptors remain dependent on the trophic effect of NGF. These neurons express tyrosine receptor kinase A (TrkA) receptors (specific receptor for NGF), and NGF is required for their structural and functional integrity . Neutralization of NGF may thus disturb the nociceptive function of these neurons. Second, several cell types produce substantial amounts of NGF at inflammatory sites, and NGF can directly affect neurons. NGF enhances currents through TRPV1 channels and reduces the threshold of thermal excitation . In vivo, the application of NGF generates hyperalgesia, and pretreatment with antibodies to NGF or a fusion protein attached to a modified TrkA receptor attenuates inflammation-induced hypersensitivity. Third, long-term exposure to NGF increases the expression of TRPV1, bradykinin receptors, P2X receptors, Na+ channels, and the synthesis of putative nociceptive transmitters such as substance P and CGRP . Fourth, NGF stimulates inflammatory cells to release inflammatory compounds . Thus, NGF is a key molecule for nociceptor biology, and its neutralization proved to be highly analgesic in humans . It remains to be seen whether NGF neutralization will become a therapeutical option or whether NGF neutralization may impair the function of nociceptors too much.
The drugs addressed so far reduce excitation/sensitization by neutralizing pronociceptive mediators and by interfering with ion channels of nociception. The multitude of mediators and ion channels involved in the generation of pain may limit the success of all efforts to treat pain by interfering with single molecules. Whether neutralization of NGF as a mediator with 'integrative functions' is feasible will be shown. Another principle of pain treatment is to employ drugs that stimulate endogenous inhibitory mechanisms. In fact, sensory neurons exhibit receptors that mediate inhibition of neuronal activity. Recently, peripheral opioid receptors were shown to produce profound antinociception experimentally as well as clinically . Further receptors with inhibitory actions are receptors for somatostatin  and cannabinoids . Experimentally, the use of specific agonists at these receptors produces antinociception [44–46]. However, the cannabinoid anandamid also activates TRPV1 receptors that may counteract antinociception [30, 45].
Although peripheral mechanisms of nociception significantly contribute to the generation of pain, the contribution of spinal, as well as supraspinal, thalamocortical mechanisms to pain generation is essential [47, 48]. As mentioned, peripheral sensitization often causes central sensitization [8, 9]. This is even induced by a single intradermal injection of capsaicin, which activates TRPV1 receptors , and is quite prominent and long-lasting during persistent inflammation in joints [3, 21]. Thus, both peripheral and central nociceptive mechanisms are options for the improvement of pain therapy.
acid-sensing ion channel
complete Freund's adjuvant
calcitonin gene-related peptide
dorsal root ganglion
voltage-gated sodium channel
nerve growth factor
tumor necrosis factor-alpha
tyrosine receptor kinase A
transient receptor potential
transient receptor potential A1
transient receptor potential M8
transient receptor potential V1
transient receptor potential V2
transient receptor potential V3
transient receptor potential V4
The authors thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for funding the position of author GN (Scha 404/13-1).