Bone formation rather than inflammation reflects Ankylosing Spondylitis activity on PET-CT: a pilot study
- Stefan TG Bruijnen†1,
- Mignon AC van der Weijden†1, 2,
- Joannes P Klein3,
- Otto S Hoekstra4,
- Ronald Boellaard4,
- J Christiaan van Denderen2,
- Ben AC Dijkmans1, 2,
- Alexandre E Voskuyl1,
- Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma1 and
- Conny J van der Laken1Email author
© Bruijnen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 October 2011
Accepted: 2 April 2012
Published: 2 April 2012
Positron Emission Tomography - Computer Tomography (PET-CT) is an interesting imaging technique to visualize Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) activity using specific PET tracers. Previous studies have shown that the PET tracers [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 can target inflammation (synovitis) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and may therefore be useful in AS. Another interesting tracer for AS is [18F]Fluoride, which targets bone formation. In a pilot setting, the potential of PET-CT in imaging AS activity was tested using different tracers, with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and conventional radiographs as reference.
In a stepwise approach different PET tracers were investigated. First, whole body [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 PET-CT scans were obtained of ten AS patients fulfilling the modified New York criteria. According to the BASDAI five of these patients had low and five had high disease activity. Secondly, an extra PET-CT scan using [18F]Fluoride was made of two additional AS patients with high disease activity. MRI scans of the total spine and sacroiliac joints were performed, and conventional radiographs of the total spine and sacroiliac joints were available for all patients. Scans and radiographs were visually scored by two observers blinded for clinical data.
No increased [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 uptake was noticed on PET-CT scans of the first 10 patients. In contrast, MRI demonstrated a total of five bone edema lesions in three out of 10 patients. In the two additional AS patients scanned with [18F]Fluoride PET-CT, [18F]Fluoride depicted 17 regions with increased uptake in both vertebral column and sacroiliac joints. In contrast, [18F]FDG depicted only three lesions, with an uptake of five times lower compared to [18F]Fluoride, and again no [11C](R)PK11195 positive lesions were found. In these two patients, MRI detected nine lesions and six out of nine matched with the anatomical position of [18F]Fluoride uptake. Conventional radiographs showed structural bony changes in 11 out of 17 [18F]Fluoride PET positive lesions.
Our PET-CT data suggest that AS activity is reflected by bone activity (formation) rather than inflammation. The results also show the potential value of PET-CT for imaging AS activity using the bone tracer [18F]Fluoride. In contrast to active RA, inflammation tracers [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 appeared to be less useful for AS imaging.
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic, inflammatory, rheumatic disease that usually starts at an early age and can result in irreversible bone deformation and disability in the long term. AS is characterized by inflammatory back pain, limited motion of the spine, and sacroiliitis on plain radiography. Peripheral arthritis and enthesitis may also be prominent features . Patients with AS are often treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) because they stabilize disease activity over time and, in addition, can reduce radiographic progression . However, with the introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, a more effective treatment of AS became possible. Patients with AS seem to benefit most if treatment with TNF blockers is started early in the disease course, particularly when started at a younger age [3, 4]. Therefore, it is important to diagnose this disease early. Until recently, plain radiographs were obligatory for the diagnosis of AS, according to the modified New York criteria . The disadvantage of this imaging technique is that it usually takes many years before the disease comes to full expression and definite radiographic sacroiliitis appears . Consequently, the diagnosis is often delayed by 5 to 10 years, especially in patients with an early or incomplete clinical picture [1, 6, 7]. To enable earlier diagnosis, highly reliable and sensitive imaging techniques are needed.
Nowadays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is believed to be a sensitive imaging modality for the detection of sacroiliitis and inflammation of the spine in early AS. MRI detects (early) inflammation by visualization of tissue edema or enhanced gadolinium contrast uptake or both. However, these imaging findings are non-specific indicators of increased free water content and increased vascularization, respectively [8, 9]. Moreover, chronic AS changes, such as new bone formation in the spine (syndesmophyte formation), tend to be less well visualized on MRI than on radiographs . Finally, although validated scoring methods are available, conflicting data on the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in (suspected) spondylarthropathies have been published [6, 11–14]. Therefore, the precise role of MRI in visualizing disease activity of AS has not yet been fully elucidated.
Positron emission tomography (PET) is another interesting imaging technique for the diagnosis of AS. PET allows sensitive imaging of functional tissue changes (pathophysiology) in the whole body by targeting binding sites . The visualization of pathophysiology makes PET potentially suitable for early detection of inflammatory processes, even before anatomical changes occur. Thereby, PET allows specificity through the use of receptor targeting tracers and allows quantification of disease activity in order to accurately monitor therapeutic effects . Recently, PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning was introduced as a hybrid imaging technique that combines the unique properties of sensitive imaging of pathophysiology and anatomical CT imaging as a reference . In this way, PET-CT offers the opportunity to visualize (early) inflammatory changes as well as (early) structural changes such as new bone formation, which is hard to detect on MRI.
The definite pathogenesis of AS is still not clear, and different joint structures may be involved in inflammatory sites in AS . Therefore, different targets for the PET tracers have to be taken into account. Synovial tissue, bone marrow, entheses, and ligaments can be affected in AS [19–21] and may need different specific tissue PET tracers. PET studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clearly revealed inflamed synovial tissue through the use of the glucose analogue [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG), visualizing increased metabolism in synovial tissue [16, 22, 23], and the macrophage tracer PK11195 [(R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N(1-methyl-propyl)-3-isoquinoline carboxamide] ([11C](R)PK11195) . [11C](R)PK11195 binds with high affinity to peripheral benzodiazepine receptors, which are expressed mainly on macrophages . Since macrophage-rich inflammation has been demonstrated in patients with AS , both [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 may be interesting tracers for detection of disease activity of AS. In addition to inflammation tracers, the bone tracer [18F]fluoride may have potential for AS imaging since AS is characterized by syndesmophyte formation and ankylosis in vertebral column and sacroiliac (SI) joints. [18F]Fluoride uptake in active bone reflects local blood flow and regional osteoblastic activity [27, 28]. Indeed, [18F]fluoride appeared to be a potential tracer for imaging of active bone sites in a small group of patients with AS .
The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the potential of PET-CT for imaging AS activity by the investigation of three different tracers in a stepwise approach with MRI and conventional radiographs as references for PET-CT data. Inflammation tracers [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 were studied in patients with AS with low and high disease activity, and these inflammation tracers were compared with the bone tracer [18F]fluoride in additional patients with high disease activity.
Materials and methods
Twelve patients who had AS (at least 18 to not more than 70 years) and who fulfilled the modified New York criteria  were included between March 2008 and December 2010. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or breast-feeding, had a pacemaker, had a creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL/minute, or had any other treatment with investigational drugs within the previous 3 months. Additionally, benzodiazepines were discontinued at least 10 days prior to inclusion to prevent (partial) blockade of benzodiazepine receptors, relevant for [11C](R)PK11195 binding. NSAIDs were continued if used at inclusion.
Five patients had low disease activity - Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) of less than 4 - and seven patients high disease activity (BASDAI of at least 4). Patients with high disease activity were candidates for treatment with a TNF-blocking agent and were included before anti-TNF treatment was started. The study protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee. All patients gave written informed consent prior to participation in the study.
In a stepwise investigation of different PET tracers, we studied the potential of PET-CT in AS by using the inflammation tracers [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 in patients with AS with low (n = 5) or high (n = 5) disease activity and subsequently compared [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 with the bone tracer [18F]fluoride in two patients with high disease activity (n = 2). As references for PET-CT data, MRI scans of the total spine and SI joints were obtained within a mean of 5 days (range of 0 of 17 days) after the PET-CT scan. Conventional radiographs of the total spine (anterior-posterior and lateral) and SI joints (posterior-anterior) were available for all patients.
[18F]-FDG, [11C](R)PK11195, and [18F]fluoride PET-CT scan
Whole-body PET-CT scans were performed by using a PET-CT type Gemini TF (Philips, Cleveland, OH, USA). Patients fasted for at least 6 hours prior to scanning with [18F]FDG. Patients were injected with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 111 ± 6 MBq [18F]FDG and 375 ± 30 MBq [11C](R)PK11195, each injection follwed by scanning, with a minimal interval period of 3 hours between the scans. Patients were in a supine position and entered the scanning machine feet first. All PET scans were preceded by a low-dose 35-milliampere-second CT scan covering the vertebral column and the SI joints. Low-dose CT was used for attenuation correction and localization of PET signal and did not allow definite identification of structural bony lesions. Sixty minutes after intravenous injection of [18F]FDG and 10 minutes after intravenous injection of [11C](R)PK11195, whole-body scans of 5 minutes per field of view (FOV) for [18F]FDG and 3 to 5 minutes per FOV for [11C](R)PK11195 were acquired of the total spine and SI joints. The maximum total scan time was approximately 60 to 75 minutes per patient. The total spine and SI joints were depicted in one image. Since the tracer [11C](R)PK11195 may easily stick to application material, the application system was flushed with 20 mL of NaCl 0.9%, and rest activity was measured after administration of the tracer.
In two additional patients with high disease activity, an extra whole-body (5 minutes per FOV) [18F]fluoride PET-CT was performed 1 hour after injection of (mean ± SD) 108 ± 1 MBq [18F]fluoride. This PET scan was also preceded by a low-dose 35-milliampere-second CT scan. The application system was flushed with 20 mL of NaCl 0.9%, and rest activity was measured after administration of the tracer.
PET data were normalized and corrected for attenuation, decay, and scatter. All scans were reconstructed as 144 × 144 matrices with a pixel size of 4 × 4 × 4 mm by using a fully three-dimensional line of response iterative reconstruction, including time-of-flight information ('Blob-OS-TF'). These reconstructed images were also used for region-of-interest definition.
A gadolinium-enhanced MRI series of the vertebral column and SI joints was performed, preferably within 1 week before or after the PET-CT scans, by using a Siemens Magneton Sonata 1.5 Tesla (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Imaging was done, using the head/neck and spine array, in coronal and sagittal orientation with T1-weighted images before and after gadolinium-contrast plus a short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence. The technical details are as follows: matrix 512 × 512 pixels, FOV of 380 mm in sagittal orientation with slice thicknesses of 3 mm for the cervical/thoracic region and 4 mm for the thoracic/lumbar region (voxel sizes of 0.7 × 0.7 × 3.0 mm and 0.7 × 0.7 × 4.0 mm, respectively). The SI region had a 256 matrix with an FOV of 270 mm in coronal/oblique orientation and a slice thickness of 4 mm (voxel size of 1.1 × 1.1 × 4.0 mm). The T1 post-gadolinium series were made with 0.5 mmol/mL Dotarem(®) (Guerbet, France) 0.2 mL/kg, and the total scan time was approximately 60 minutes.
On conventional radiographs, cervical spine and lumbar spine were visually interpreted and scored according to the m-SASSS scoring method (score of 0 to 72). Additionally, the thoracic spine was scored according to the m-SASSS criteria, although they are not validated for this part of the spine. However, no other scoring methods are available for the thoracic spine. In addition, the involvement of the posterior lesions of the spine was visually determined by one observer and a radiologist. The SI joints were scored according to the modified New York criteria (score of 0 to 8).
A nuclear medicine specialist and a rheumatologist qualitatively interpreted PET-CT data. For relative comparison of tracer uptake, regions of interests were drawn in AMIDE (a Medical Imaging Data Examiner) data analysis software . With the covering low-dose CT as an anatomical reference, elliptic cylinders and rectangular boxes were drawn on top of focal hotspots and a (non-hotspot) vertebral body (in principle, L1, if unaffected) (background), respectively, to calculate mean uptake ratios. MRI data were qualitatively evaluated by a radiologist for subchondral bone marrow edema, gadolinium enhancement, cartilage abnormalities, periarticular erosions, subchondral fatty marrow infiltration, and ankylosis.
Data and images of this pilot study were analyzed in a descriptive manner. Owing to the small study population, a normal distribution of data is not expected. Therefore, patient characteristics were analyzed by using SPSS version 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and values were presented as median (range).
Baseline demographic, clinical, functional, and x-ray characteristics of patients
Low disease activity (BASDAI < 4) (n= 5)
High disease activity (BASDAI ≥ 4) (n= 7)
Duration since diagnosisa, years
Duration of symptomsb, years
[18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 PET-CT with MRI as a reference
Comparison of [18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195 and [18F]fluoride PET-CT with MRI as a reference
Comparison of PET-CT outcome with MRI and conventional radiography of subpopulation scanned with [18F]FDG, [11C](R)PK11195, and [18F]fluoride
MRI depicted nine bone marrow lesions, with enhanced signal on both STIR and gadolinium contrast T1 images, in the spine of these two patients (Table 2). Only one out of three [18F]FDG hotspots matched with MRI lesions, and two thirds of the MRI lesions matched with the anatomical position of [18F]fluoride uptake. The number of [18F]fluoride lesions (n = 17) exceeded those detected on MRI (n = 9) (Table 2). Eleven active lesions were depicted with [18F]fluoride PET-CT and not on MRI. Three lesions (two cervical and one lumbar vertebrae) were detected on MRI and not on [18F]fluoride PET. Of note, whole-body [18F]fluoride scans additionally showed hotspots in the manubriosternal joints in both patients and in the left acromion-clavicular joint in one patient corresponding to clinical symptoms (data not shown in Table 2).
Comparison of [18F]fluoride PET and MRI with conventional x-rays
Active sites on [18F]fluoride PET-CT or MRI or both were compared with structural changes observed on conventional x-rays (Table 2). In four out of six PET- and MRI-positive lesions, conventional radiography depicted sclerosis. In seven out of 11 PET-positive/MRI-negative lesions, structural changes were found: sclerosis (n = 1), squaring (n = 3), facet arthrosis (n = 2), and ankylosis (n = 1). Furthermore, PET or MRI or both depicted nine active sites with no radiographic structural changes. Conversely, seven sites with structural changes on conventional radiography did not depict any activity on either PET or MRI: sclerosis (n = 3), squaring (n = 2), facet arthrosis (n = 2).
Results of this pilot study show the potential of PET-CT imaging of AS activity. Targeting of bone formation appears to be the most promising approach to visualize AS activity. Inflammation tracers ([18F]FDG and [11C](R)PK11195) seem to be less useful for imaging of AS than for imaging of active RA [16, 22–24].
There may be several explanations for the discrepancy between [18F]FDG, [11C](R)PK11195, and [18F]fluoride PET-CT findings. First of all, since the definite pathogenesis of AS still has to be elucidated, it is unknown which target site for imaging of AS is optimal . Entheses are of special interest, and synovitis seems to be less prominent in AS compared with RA . In addition, syndesmophyte formation and ankylosis, hallmarks of AS, reflect local osteoblastic activity. Our PET-CT findings suggest that bone formation (for example, osteoblastic activity) may be a more prominent feature of AS activity than inflammation. The present PET-CT results with the different tracers, therefore, reveal interesting data that may provide insights into the pathogenesis of AS.
Secondly, tracer biodistribution may be related to varying tracer characteristics. Uptake mechanisms are different for each tracer. In (red) bone marrow, [11C](R)PK11195 PET scans showed a diffuse increased uptake pattern which could possibly overwhelm potential small focal activity spots in or around bone. [18F]FDG is probably a useful marker for synovitis [16, 22, 23] and osteomyelitis [31, 32] but may be less suited for detection of (non- or low-inflammatory) bone formation in AS [33–37]. In general, [18F]FDG seems to be more useful for detection of osteolytic than for osteoblastic lesions . [18F]Fluoride, on the other hand, reflects osteoblastic activity because of the tracer's uptake into hydroxyapatite crystals, which form the mineral fluoroapatite within bone, especially at sites of bone formation [27, 28, 39]. Our positive results with [18F]fluoride PET-CT in both vertebral column and SI joints of patients with AS correspond with [18F]fluoride PET-CT findings of Strobel and colleagues  in SI joints of patients with AS and osteo-articular [18F]fluoride findings of Ben Ali and colleagues , indicating that [18F]fluoride is a potential tracer for active bone sites in AS.
A third explanation for the differences in uptake of the three tracers might be related to patient selection. Patients were categorized in low or high disease activity group according to the BASDAI level. BASDAI is a patient questionnaire commonly used to assess disease activity in AS. Congruent imaging results (no active lesions) were found in four out of five patients with low disease activity, corresponding to BASDAI measurements. In contrast, in patients with high disease activity (BASDAI ≥ 4), three out of seven patients with AS did not show any active inflammation on MRI. This corresponds to findings of others who did not find any association between MRI and clinical data [41, 42]. Therefore, high BASDAI scores with negative MRI may be more related to secondary degenerative changes and ankylosis rather than active inflammation. This is supported by the finding that six out of seven patients with high disease activity showed bony structural lesions in one or more vertebral bodies; at least 50% of these lesions had degenerative characteristics. Indeed, nowadays, the BASDAI is criticized, and recent studies express the belief that the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) is a better selection criterion than BASDAI [43–45]. Furthermore, NSAIDs were continued if used at inclusion. In theory, NSAID use may have suppressed inflammatory activity; however, Gaspersic and colleagues  showed that anti-inflammatory drugs have no influence on monitoring AS with MRI. In our study, NSAIDs did not seem to influence [18F]fluoride uptake in active lesions since PET-CT scans depicted 17 hotspots in the two patients scanned with this tracer.
PET-CT data were compared with MRI and conventional radiographs as references. Focusing on the two patients additionally scanned with [18F]fluoride PET-CT, most MRI lesions corresponded to lesions with [18F]fluoride uptake on the PET scan. Additionally, two active [18F]fluoride PET-CT lesions in SI joints showed subchondral fatty marrow infiltration on MRI. Although the exact significance of subchondral fatty marrow infiltration is not yet clear, it is believed to be a late structural change due to chronic inflammation in AS .
On the other hand, in 11 out of 17 [18F]fluoride PET-positive lesions, structural changes were found on conventional x-rays. (Secondary) degenerative changes such as sclerosis and facet arthrosis may result in a positive [18F]fluoride signal. However, these lesions could also reflect chronic AS disease activity (the mean symptom duration of patients 11 and 12 was 22 years). Indeed, degenerative changes as well as other structural changes such as squaring and syndesmophyte formation can coexist with chronic inflammation . Finally, the observed [18F]fluoride hotspots in the sternum and shoulder seemed to correlate with clinical symptoms of patients, again underlining the potential of [18F]fluoride PET-CT to visualize active sites in AS.
Despite the limited number of patients investigated in this study, our PET-CT results suggest that AS activity was reflected by bone formation and not by inflammation, and this finding throws an interesting light on the pathogenesis of the disease. In addition, [18F]fluoride PET-CT seems to be a promising imaging technique for detecting active lesions in the spine and SI joints of patients with AS, but the definite value of [18F]fluoride PET-CT as a diagnostic tool for assessment of AS activity needs to be further explored in future studies with larger cohort(s) of patients with AS.
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
- [11C](R)PK11195 PK11195 [(R:
field of view
magnetic resonance imaging
modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
positron emission tomography
positron emission tomography-computer tomography
short-tau inversion recovery
tumor necrosis factor.
- Sieper J, Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Boonen A, Zink A: Ankylosing spondylitis: an overview. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002, 61 (Suppl 3): iii8-18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wanders A, Heijde D, Landewe R, Behier JM, Calin A, Olivieri I, Zeidler H, Dougados M: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs reduce radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52: 1756-1765. 10.1002/art.21054.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Brandt J, Braun J, Sieper J: Prediction of a major clinical response (BASDAI 50) to tumour necrosis factor alpha blockers in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004, 63: 665-670. 10.1136/ard.2003.016386.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haibel H, Sieper J: Editorial review: how early should ankylosing spondylitis be treated with a tumor necrosis factor-blocker?. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2010, 22: 388-392. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32833aaf93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A: Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984, 27: 361-368. 10.1002/art.1780270401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rostom S, Dougados M, Gossec L: New tools for diagnosing spondyloarthropathy. Joint Bone Spine. 2010, 77: 108-114. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.12.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Khan MA, Braun J, Sieper J: How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004, 63: 535-543. 10.1136/ard.2003.011247.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maksymowych WP, Lambert RG: Magnetic resonance imaging for spondyloarthritis--avoiding the minefield. J Rheumatol. 2007, 34: 259-265.Google Scholar
- Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KG, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, Marzo-Ortega H, Ostergaard M, Braun J, Sieper J: Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 1520-1527. 10.1136/ard.2009.110767.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braun J, Baraliakos X, Golder W, Hermann KG, Listing J, Brandt J, Rudwaleit M, Zuehlsdorf S, Bollow M, Sieper J, van der Heijde D: Analysing chronic spinal changes in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic comparison of conventional × rays with magnetic resonance imaging using established and new scoring systems. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004, 63: 1046-1055. 10.1136/ard.2003.019968.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weber U, Hodler J, Kubik RA, Rufibach K, Lambert RG, Kissling RO, Pfirrmann CW, Maksymowych WP: Sensitivity and specificity of spinal inflammatory lesions assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or recent-onset inflammatory back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 61: 900-908. 10.1002/art.24507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rudwaleit M, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Listing J, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Collantes-Estevez E, Davis J, Dijkmans B, Dougados M, Emery P, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Inman R, Khan MA, Leirisalo-Repo M, van der Linden S, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Olivieri I, Sturrock R, de Vlam K, Sieper J: The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part I): classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 770-776. 10.1136/ard.2009.108217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Braun J, Chou CT, Collantes-Estevez E, Dougados M, Huang F, Gu J, Khan MA, Kirazli Y, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Sørensen IJ, Ozgocmen S, Roussou E, Valle-Oñate R, Weber U, Wei J, Sieper J: The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 777-783. 10.1136/ard.2009.108233.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maksymowych WP: MRI in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009, 21: 313-317. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32832af481.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones T: The role of positron emission tomography within the spectrum of medical imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996, 23: 207-211. 10.1007/BF01731847.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elzinga EH, van der Laken CJ, Comans EF, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, Dijkmans BA, Lammertsma AA, Voskuyl AE: 18F-FDG PET as a tool to predict the clinical outcome of infliximab treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an explorative study. J Nucl Med. 2011, 52: 77-80. 10.2967/jnumed.110.076711.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF: Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology. 2006, 238: 405-422. 10.1148/radiol.2382041977.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maksymowych WP: Disease modification in ankylosing spondylitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010, 6: 75-81. 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frost ML, Cook GJ, Blake GM, Marsden PK, Benatar NA, Fogelman I: A prospective study of risedronate on regional bone metabolism and blood flow at the lumbar spine measured by 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 2003, 18: 2215-2222. 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.12.2215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tam LS, Gu J, Yu D: Pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010, 6: 399-405. 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muche B, Bollow M, Francois RJ, Sieper J, Hamm B, Braun J: Anatomic structures involved in early- and late-stage sacroiliitis in spondylarthritis: a detailed analysis by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48: 1374-1384. 10.1002/art.10934.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beckers C, Ribbens C, Andre B, Marcelis S, Kaye O, Mathy L, Kaiser MJ, Hustinx R, Foidart J, Malaise MG: Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2004, 45: 956-964.Google Scholar
- Elzinga EH, van der Laken CJ, Comans EF, Lammertsma AA, Dijkmans BA, Voskuyl AE: 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose joint uptake on positron emission tomography images: rheumatoid arthritis versus osteoarthritis. Mol Imaging Biol. 2007, 9: 357-360. 10.1007/s11307-007-0113-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van der Laken CJ, Elzinga EH, Kropholler MA, Molthoff CF, van der Heijden JW, Maruyama K, Boellaard R, Dijkmans BA, Lammertsma AA, Voskuyl AE: Noninvasive imaging of macrophages in rheumatoid synovitis using 11C-(R)-PK11195 and positron emission tomography. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58: 3350-3355. 10.1002/art.23955.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Canat X, Guillaumont A, Bouaboula M, Poinot-Chazel C, Derocq JM, Carayon P, LeFur G, Casellas P: Peripheral benzodiazepine receptor modulation with phagocyte differentiation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1993, 46: 551-554. 10.1016/0006-2952(93)90535-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baeten D, Kruithof E, De Rycke L, Boots AM, Mielants H, Veys EM, De Keyser F: Infiltration of the synovial membrane with macrophage subsets and polymorphonuclear cells reflects global disease activity in spondyloarthropathy. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005, 7: R359-R369. 10.1186/ar1501.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fischer DR, Maquieira GJ, Espinosa N, Zanetti M, Hesselmann R, Johayem A, Hany TF, von Schulthess GK, Strobel K: Therapeutic impact of [(18)F]fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography on patients with unclear foot pain. Skeletal Radiol. 2010, 39: 987-997. 10.1007/s00256-010-0875-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cook GJ, Fogelman I: The role of positron emission tomography in the management of bone metastases. Cancer. 2000, 88: 2927-2933. 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12+<2927::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strobel K, Fischer DR, Tamborrini G, Kyburz D, Stumpe KD, Hesselmann RG, Johayem A, von Schulthess GK, Michel BA, Ciurea A: 18F-fluoride PET/CT for detection of sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010, 37: 1760-1765. 10.1007/s00259-010-1464-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loening AM, Gambhir SS: AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis. Mol Imaging. 2003, 2: 131-137. 10.1162/153535003322556877.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Familiari D, Glaudemans AW, Vitale V, Prosperi D, Bagni O, Lenza A, Cavallini M, Scopinaro F, Signore A: Can sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT replace WBC imaging in the diabetic foot?. J Nucl Med. 2011, 52: 1012-1019. 10.2967/jnumed.110.082222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guhlmann A, Brecht-Krauss D, Suger G, Glatting G, Kotzerke J, Kinzl L, Reske SN: Chronic osteomyelitis: detection with FDG PET and correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology. 1998, 206: 749-754.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhargava P, Naydich M, Ghesani M: Normal F-18 FDG vertebral uptake in Paget's disease on PET scanning. Clin Nucl Med. 2005, 30: 191-192. 10.1097/00003072-200503000-00012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braun J, Davis J, Dougados M, Sieper J, van der Linden S, van der Heijde D, ASAS Working Group: First update of the international ASAS consensus statement for the use of anti-TNF agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006, 65: 316-320. 10.1136/ard.2005.040758.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cook GJ, Maisey MN, Fogelman I: Fluorine-18-FDG PET in Paget's disease of bone. J Nucl Med. 1997, 38: 1495-1497.Google Scholar
- Creemers MC, Franssen MJ, van't Hof MA, Gribnau FW, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL: Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005, 64: 127-129. 10.1136/ard.2004.020503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Woo JH, Kim S, Choi SJ, Lee YH, Ji JD, Song GG: Diagnosis of Paget's disease of the pelvis using F-18 FDG PET/CT. Int J Rheum Dis. 2010, 13: e51-e54. 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2010.01538.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huyge V, Garcia C, Vanderstappen A, Alexiou J, Gil T, Flamen P: Progressive osteoblastic bone metastases in breast cancer negative on FDG-PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2009, 34: 417-420. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181a7d03c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piert M, Zittel TT, Becker GA, Jahn M, Stahlschmidt A, Maier G, Machulla HJ, Bares R: Assessment of porcine bone metabolism by dynamic. J Nucl Med. 2001, 42: 1091-1100.Google Scholar
- Ben Ali K, Poisson T, Compaore C, Lebtahi R, Sarda-Mantel L, Burg S, Wattiaux MJ, Meyer O, Hayem G, Le Guludec D: Interest of NaF-PET/CT in SAPHO syndrome. J Nucl Med Meeting Abstracts. 2010, 51: 1641-Google Scholar
- Bredella MA, Steinbach LS, Morgan S, Ward M, Davis JC: MRI of the sacroiliac joints in patients with moderate to severe ankylosing spondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006, 187: 1420-1426. 10.2214/AJR.05.1423.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goh L, Suresh P, Gafoor A, Hughes P, Hickling P: Disease activity in longstanding ankylosing spondylitis: a correlation of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Clin Rheumatol. 2008, 27: 449-455. 10.1007/s10067-007-0726-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lukas C, Landewé R, Sieper J, Dougados M, Davis J, Braun J, van der Linden S, van der Heijde D, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society: Development of an ASAS-endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 18-24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Machado P, Landewé R, Lie E, Kvien TK, Braun J, Baker D, van der Heijde D, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011, 70: 47-53. 10.1136/ard.2010.138594.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Machado P, van der Heijde D: How to measure disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis?. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011, 23: 339-345. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283470f23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gaspersic N, Sersa I, Jevtic V, Tomsic M, Praprotnik S: Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2008, 37: 123-131. 10.1007/s00256-007-0407-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Madsen KB, Jurik AG: Magnetic resonance imaging grading system for active and chronic spondylarthritis changes in the sacroiliac joint. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010, 62: 11-18. 10.1002/acr.20008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maksymowych WP, Chiowchanwisawakit P, Clare T, Pedersen SJ, Ostergaard M, Lambert RG: Inflammatory lesions of the spine on magnetic resonance imaging predict the development of new syndesmophytes in ankylosing spondylitis: evidence of a relationship between inflammation and new bone formation. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60: 93-102. 10.1002/art.24132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.