B cells tell scleroderma fibroblasts to produce collagen
© BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Published: 28 November 2013
Skip to main content
© BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Published: 28 November 2013
In fibrosis fibroblasts are activated and overproduce collagen in a process with unknown drivers and equally unknown brakes that recently implicated a novel and surprising player, the B cell. B cells may be crucially involved in fibrosis in several ways: B cells may produce autoantibodies that can directly stimulate fibroblasts; B cells can produce profibrotic cytokines such as IL-6 or transforming growth factor beta; and, finally, B cells could directly stimulate fibroblasts by a contact-dependent mechanism. Recent experimental evidence suggests that B cells can enhance collagen production by fibroblasts, by a contact-dependent mechanism, and therefore are profibrotic ex vivo. These data strengthen the rationale of pursuing B-cell targeting therapies in systemic sclerosis.
In fibrosis fibroblasts are activated and overproduce collagen in a process with unknown drivers and equally unknown brakes that recently implicated a novel and surprising player, the B cell.
In the previous issue of Arthritis Research and Therapy, Francois and colleagues provided experimental evidence of a contact-dependent crosstalk between B cells and fibroblasts; scleroderma fibroblasts exhibit a more than twofold increase in collagen production when co-cultured with B cells compared with when cultured alone . This B-cell-induced collagen production is comparable with the effects of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), the most potent profibrotic mediator. Enhancement of collagen production was seen when fibroblasts were co-cultured with circulating B cells only but not with whole peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Genes encoding collagen I and collagen III were significantly upregulated in the B-cell/fibroblast co-culture system compared with fibroblasts cultured alone. Importantly, the α-smooth muscle actin α-SMA gene that has a key role in the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts was also overexpressed.
When the survival factor B-cell activating factor (BAFF) was added along with B-cell receptor-initiated B-cell stimulation in the B-cell/fibroblast co-culture system, a further significant enhancement of collagen production and α-SMA expression was seen; interestingly, the fibroblasts did not express any BAFF receptors. To address the question of whether B cells interact with fibroblasts via direct cell contact or via soluble factors, the authors employed in some experiments a transwell culture system allowing for a free and bidirectional diffusion of soluble factors but prohibiting direct B-cell–fibroblast contact. In these transwell experiments the induction of fibroblast collagen production was lost, clearly indicating a contact-dependent mechanism. However, transwells only partially inhibited the effect of BAFF + B-cell receptor stimulation on fibroblasts, indicating that soluble factors also participate in the BAFF scenario. The production of IL-6, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand-2 and TGFβ was significantly increased in co-cultures and the use of transwells decreased but did not abolish their production. Finally, blocking TGFβ (but not blocking IL-6) led to a significant inhibition of the effect of B cells plus BAFF on fibroblasts, suggesting a key role for TGFβ.
There are certain issues the reader must take into account to fully interpret this study. The authors initially employed co-cultures of normal B cells with either normal or systemic sclerosis (SSc) skin fibroblasts. Interestingly, the results on collagen production were similar irrespective of the fibroblasts in the co-culture. The authors chose to continue their experiments with fibroblasts obtained from patients with scleroderma skin only, again employing normal B cells in the co-culture system. Francois and colleagues did not employ B cells from patients with scleroderma because they speculated that the effect of normal B cells on the fibroblasts was so strong that the activated scleroderma B cell might not be able to produce any stronger effects. This is clearly speculative; an experiment not performed leads to missing potentially valuable data. Therefore, the results of the study by Francois and colleagues could apply directly to the pathogenesis of scleroderma only if we knew that the scleroderma B cell is a perfectly normal B cell. There are, however, experimental data pointing to the contrary.
B cells from tight skin mice, an animal model of SSc, exhibit enhanced CD19 signaling and are hyperresponsive. Induced CD19 deficiency in tight skin mice normalizes B-cell responses and attenuates skin fibrosis, while B-cell depletion therapy in such models is effective [2, 3]. B cells in patients with SSc are present in the skin  and the lungs ; expression of CD19 is increased and the cells’ homeostasis is disturbed . Microarrays from scleroderma skin disclosed fibroblast, endothelial cell and, surprisingly, B-cell genes to be upregulated compared with normal skin . Finally, emerging clinical data suggest a favorable effect of the B-cell depleting agent rituximab on skin and lung fibrosis in patients with SSc [8–10].
This study introduces the novel concept that B cells are profibrotic ex vivo. Several questions remain to be answered. The first question is how B cells physically interact with fibroblasts; this should be explored in future studies. Nevertheless, the most important issue is whether B cells are profibrotic in vivo. The encouraging results of several studies assessing the effect of B-cell depletion in SSc may lead to the hypothesis that B cells are also profibrotic in SSc. The study of Francois and colleagues provides strong experimental evidence in favor of a crucial role of B cells in the pathophysiology of fibrosis and therefore strengthens the rationale of pursuing B-cell targeting therapies in SSc.
B-cell activating factor
Transforming growth factor beta.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.