Volume 4 Supplement 3

The Scientific Basis of Rheumatology

Open Access

Endothelial activation: intracellular signaling pathways

Arthritis Research & Therapy20024(Suppl 3):S109

DOI: 10.1186/ar576

Received: 14 November 2001

Accepted: 4 February 2002

Published: 9 May 2002

Chapter summary

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is the prototypic proinflammatory cytokine and endothelial cells are the principal cellular targets of its actions. Here I review the responses of endothelial cells to TNF, with emphasis on the induction of endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecules. I focus on the biochemistry and cell biology of signal transduction in TNF-treated endothelial cells that lead to the expression of adhesion molecules.

Keywords

adhesion molecules cytokines inflammation leukocytes tumor necrosis factor

Introduction

Inflammation, defined as the local recruitment and activation of leukocytes, is an essential component of the innate immune response to pathogens and damaged cells. Consequently, mouse and human genetic defects in leukocyte recruitment manifest themselves as an increased frequency and susceptibility to infection and/or as a failure to remove degenerating tissues, such as the stump of a neonatal umbilical cord [1]. The innate inflammatory response has only a limited ability to distinguish normal from infected or damaged cells. Consequently, injury to healthy bystander cells at a site of inflammation is common. Moreover, unresolved inflammation can itself become a disease process, a clear example being rheumatoid arthritis. Inhibition of inflammation in such settings has become a primary goal of therapy irrespective of the underlying cause of the disease. For this reason, it is important to understand how inflammation develops and how it is regulated. In this chapter, I describe how tumor necrosis factor (TNF), an important mediator of innate inflammation, acts on vascular endothelial cells (ECs) to promote the inflammatory response.

Historical background

A description of the inflammatory response to injured tissues at the level of light microscopy was first made over 100 years ago [2]. In those pioneering studies, Cohnheim noted that margination of leukocytes along the luminal surface of the postcapillary venule is the prelude to extravasation. Before the 1980s, these events were generally interpreted as a response of circulating leukocytes to chemoattractant substances elaborated within the tissue, either by infectious microbes (e.g. N-formyl peptides) or by the innate response (e.g. complement fragment C5a) [3]. Margination was explained by the observation that such substances not only induced chemotaxis but also triggered adhesion to endothelium, although the increase in adhesion was usually quite small (not more than twofold) [4]. This model did not explain why superfusion of chemotactic substances does not cause circulating leukocytes to adhere to endothelium until they reach the venules [5].

Endothelial-cell-based model of inflammation

A re-evaluation of this paradigm began in the mid 1980s with the finding that exposure of ECs to cytokines, such as IL-1 or TNF, caused the ECs to bind 20 to 40 times as many leukocytes as untreated ECs, dwarfing the effects of chemotaxins [6]. The change in EC adhesivity arose from the induction of new surface proteins, collectively designated as endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecules (ELAMs), that bind counter-receptor proteins expressed on leukocytes [7]. Cytokine-treated ECs are also a source of chemoattractant cytokines (chemokines) that contribute to adhesion by activating the affinity of leukocyte counter-receptors for ELAMs [7]. These observations, combined with new experimental models such as parallel plate flow chambers and ex vivo videomicroscopy, led to the current multistep model of leukocyte recruitment centered on the responses of the vascular ECs lining postcapillary venules rather than on responses of leukocytes [8, 9]. In brief, resting ECs are now viewed as noninteractive with leukocytes, so that random encounters with circulating white cells are short-lived, leaving both cells unaltered. Microbes and other inflammatory stimuli induce resident macrophages to release cytokines such as TNF or IL-1, which induce venular ECs to synthesize and express new proteins on their luminal cell surface. Critically, cytokine-treated ECs express several new ELAMS, namely E-selectin and integrin-ligands such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), that can interact with blood leukocytes. (Mouse ECs, but not human ones, also upregulate P-selectin in response to TNF or IL-1.) Cytokine-activated ECs also synthesize, secrete, and display (in association with cell-surface proteoglycans) chemokines on their luminal surface. Circulating leukocytes that bump into cytokine-activated ECs rapidly form low-affinity interactions mediated by binding to E-selectin and/or VCAM-1. Shear force, imparted by flowing blood, causes these interactions to be rapidly broken, only to reform rapidly as the leukocyte is displaced. Multiple iterations of these processes results in rolling of the leukocyte on the EC surface. Rolling, but not free-flowing, leukocytes encounter and respond to the surface-displayed chemokines, causing cell spreading and clustering of surface integrins (such as LFA-1 and VLA-4) at the contact area with the ECs. These leukocyte integrins are the counter-receptors for ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on ECs, and enhanced interactions by clustered integrins produce firm attachment to the ECs. Bound chemokines also stimulate leukocyte chemokinesis, resulting in crawling on the EC surface. As crawling leukocytes reach the junction between ECs, they extravasate through the junction into the tissue space, resulting in inflammation.

Several refinements of this EC-based model of inflammation are worth noting. One point involves the specialized nature of venular ECs. Although ICAM-1 is upregulated by TNF or IL-1 on essentially all ECs lining the microvasculature, E-selectin and VCAM-1 are normally confined to ECs of the postcapillary venule, the site of leukocyte rolling and margination [10]. However, in certain disease states (e.g. psoriasis), capillaries also may express these molecules, and the pattern of leukocyte extravasation changes to match that of expression of adhesion molecules [11]. In addition, the patterns of adhesion molecule expression (and chemokine expression) are dynamic. For example, expression of E-selectin, associated with neutrophil extravasation, peaks early (at 2–4 hours) after TNF addition, corresponding to the onset of neutrophil recruitment. VCAM-1, which is more closely associated with binding of mononuclear leukocytes, typically peaks at later times (12–24 hours) after TNF addition, corresponding to the onset of T-cell recruitment [12]. Finally, the EC response to TNF can be modified by T-cell-derived cytokines. For example, IFN-γ prolongs the expression of E-selectin [13], whereas IL-4 suppresses the expression of E-selectin while promoting that of VCAM-1 [14]. These alterations in the EC surface produce corresponding changes in the nature of the inflammatory leukocyte populations that are recruited. Specifically, IFN-γ favors recruitment of leukocytes associated with inflammation of the T-helper-1 type (dependent on E-selectin), whereas IL-4 favors inflammation of the T-helper-2 type (independent of E-selectin) [15]. In other words, the spatial, temporal, and qualitative patterns of EC adhesion molecule expression govern the location, evolution, and nature of the inflammatory response.

The biochemistry of TNF signaling in endothelial cells

A central role of TNF in inflammation has been established by observations that many inflammatory reactions are impaired in TNF or TNF-receptor (TNFR) knockout mice [16] and that, in humans, TNF inhibitors (soluble receptors or neutralizing antibodies) are effective anti-inflammatory therapeutics [17]. As I have noted, proinflammatory actions of TNF on ECs generally involve new protein synthesis. In general, these changes are initiated by new gene transcription [7]. Two specific transactivating (transcription) factors, NF-κB and activator protein-1 (AP-1), are essential (although probably not sufficient) for TNF induction of ELAMs [18]. The evidence for this conclusion is that the E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 genes each contain DNA sequences in their 5' flanking regions that bind various forms of NF-κB and AP-1 in electrophoretic-mobility-shift assays and that mutations of these sequences reduce TNF responses of transfected promoter–reporter genes. In addition, transfection experiments of wild-type and mutant forms of NF-κB and AP-1 subunits into cultured ECs can regulate in the expression of E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1.

An active area of research in the 1990s was the elucidation of signaling pathways through which TNF could activate NF-κB and AP-1. Human ECs, like most other cell types, express two different TNFRs, designated TNFR1 (CD120a) and TNFR2 (CD120b) [19]. Signaling is initiated when ligand-occupied receptors recruit the binding of intracellular adaptor proteins to the intracellular portions of the receptor molecules (reviewed in [20, 21]). Initially, ligand-occupied TNFR1 binds TNF-receptor-associated death-domain protein (TRADD) through interactions of homologous regions, called 'death domains' (DDs), expressed in both proteins [22]. The original DD was so named because it was found in the death-inducing receptor Fas as well as in an adaptor protein recruited to ligand-occupied Fas, called Fas-associated DD protein (FADD). The three-dimensional structure of the TNFR1 DD has recently been solved by two separate groups of researchers, and two interactive TRADD binding sites have been defined [23, 24]. Unoccupied TNFR1 associates with a DD-containing protein, called silencer of DDs (SODD), which is displaced by TRADD upon TNF binding [25]. Receptor-bound TRADD can recruit FADD through DD interactions and thereby mimic the death-activation responses of Fas [26].

TRADD recruitment also initiates the recruitment of two other adaptor proteins that have been linked to activation of NF-κB and for AP-1, namely receptor interacting protein (RIP) and TNF-receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2). RIP is a serine/threonine kinase that contains a DD that mediates binding to TRADD [27]. The mechanism of action of RIP is unclear; kinase-inactive RIP can function when overexpressed, but this may involve recruitment of endogenous RIP molecules with an intact kinase activity. Thymocytes from knockout mice lacking RIP cannot activate NF-κB in response to TNF but can still respond to TNF by activating AP-1 [28]. TRAF2 binds to the N-terminal domain of TRADD, i.e. outside the DD [29]. TRAF2 contains an N-terminal RING domain, which is essential for its signaling, a series of zinc fingers, and C-terminal TRAF domains shared with other members of the TRAF family. The TRAF domains mediate both self-association and binding to adaptor proteins (e.g. TRADD). Unlike RIP, TRAF2 has no known enzymatic activities (although RING domains may act as E3 ubiquitin ligases) [30]. Embryonic fibroblasts lacking TRAF2 show a partially impaired ability of TNF to activate NF-κB and show complete loss of TNF-induced activation of AP-1 [31]. (The incomplete effect of TRAF2 deficiency may arise because of redundancy with TRAF5 [32].) TRAF2 may indirectly contribute to NF-κB activation by recruiting and/or stabilizing the interactions of RIP with its downstream targets [33]. Overexpression of either RIP or TRAF2 in wild-type cells can initiate both NF-κB and AP-1 signaling independent of TNF, TNFR1, or TRADD, possibly by driving association of adaptor proteins in a nonphysiological manner.

The physiological downstream targets of RIP or TRAF2 remain uncertain. Both the NF-κB and the AP-1 pathways are activated by members of the mitogen-activated-protein kinase (MAPK) kinase kinase (MAP3K, also known as MEKK) family. Experiments in gene-knockout embryonic fibroblasts implicate MEKK-1 in the AP-1 pathway [34] and MEKK3 in the NF-κB pathway [35] activated by TNF. Several different MEKKs can phosphorylate and activate a cytosolic enzymatic complex called IκB kinase (IKK) [36]. This multiprotein complex contains at least two active kinases (IKK-α and IKK-β), as well as a regulatory protein that lacks kinase activity, called IKK-γ, or NEMO. Studies in gene-knockout animals point to IKK-β as the crucial component that mediates TNF-induced phosphorylation of cytosolic inhibitor of κB (IκB) proteins [37, 38] and show that IKK-γ (NEMO) is required for this response [39].

In unstimulated cells, IκB proteins normally sequester dimeric NF-κB complexes in the cytosol, preventing their entry into the nucleus where gene transcription occurs [40]. In response to TNF, IκB proteins are phosphorylated by IKK upon critical serine residues, and, once phosphorylated, are rapidly ubiquitinated and then degraded by the cytosolic proteosome. This process occurs within 15 minutes of treating human umbilical-vein-derived endothelial cells (HUVECs) with TNF. In HUVECs, TNF causes degradation of IκB-α, -β, and -ε [41, 42]. Once an IκB protein is degraded, the associated NF-κB is free to move from the cytosol to the nucleus and activate transcription by binding to specific DNA sequences in the enhancers of target genes. In HUVECs, TNF-activated NF-κB is formed of homodimers or heterodimers involving three different members of the Rel family, namely p50 (also called NF-κB1), p65 (also called Rel A), and c-Rel. Homodimers of p50 appear to be constitutively present in the nucleus and are not regulated by IκB degradation. A recent report has suggested that IκB-α and IκB-β associate primarily with p50/p65 or p50/c-Rel heterodimers, whereas IκB-ε associates primarily with p50/c-Rel or c-Rel homodimers [42]. Minor variations in a κB-binding DNA sequence may favor binding of one form of NF-κB over another. In experiments using electrophoretic-mobility-shift assay, the three E-selectin elements preferentially bind p50/p65 heterodimers [4345]. The VCAM-1 promoter contains two tandem κB-binding sites that also appear to preferentially bind p50/p65 [46, 47]. In contrast, the ICAM-1 promoter contains one κB element that may preferentially bind p50/c-Rel heterodimers or c-Rel heterodimers [42, 48].

AP-1 activation occurs when an MAP3K, probably MEKK-1, phosphorylates and activates several MAP2Ks (also known as MEKs), which, in turn, phosphorylate and activate several MAPKs (also known as stress-activated protein kinases, or SAPKs) such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-1 and -2 and p38 MAPK [49]. JNK-1 and -2 phosphorylate the transactivating domain of c-Jun, a component of AP-1, and thereby enable AP-1 to activate gene transcription. Normally, c-Jun forms heterodimers with members of the Fos family, such as c-Fos or FosB, but c-Jun also can heterodimerize with activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) to form a variant form of AP-1. TNF increases the binding of c-Jun/ATF2 to a DNA sequence in the E-selectin promoter [50]. Transfected E-selectin promoter–reporter genes lacking the c-Jun/ATF2-binding site are much less active than wild type [51], and E-selectin transcription does not occur in mice lacking ATF2 [52]. The transcriptional potential of ATF2, like that of c-Jun, can be increased by phosphorylation of its transactivating domain, catalyzed by p38 MAP kinase. However, while overexpression of a c-Jun mutant that cannot be phosphorylated (or of dominant negative JNK isoforms) will inhibit E-selectin transcription, a mutant form of ATF2 that cannot be phosphorylated is not inhibitory [51]. This suggests that c-Jun/ATF2 is necessary for E-selectin transcription but that only the c-Jun subunit needs to be phosphorylated for efficient gene transactivation. Both ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 also contain AP-1 binding sites (commonly called tetrahydrophorbol response elements, or TREs) that bind AP-1 in TNF-treated ECs [53, 54]. In this case, AP-1 consists of c-Jun/cFos heterodimers. The significance of the canonical TRE in the VCAM-1 promoter has been questioned because this element is lacking in mice [54]. However, human and mouse VCAM-1 may not be regulated in the same manner, and a role of AP-1 in VCAM-1 transcription has been demonstrated using promoter–reporter genes in human ECs, although the site where AP-1 appears to bind in the model is distinct from the consensus TRE and is instead located between the two κB-binding elements [55].

Although the activation of NF-κB and AP-1 may involve divergent pathways, these factors interact in the nucleus through concomitant binding of gene coactivators, such as histone acetyl transferases like CREB-binding protein (CBP), or p300 [56]. The steric positioning of individual transcription factors bound to DNA, which permits coordinate interactions with coactivators, may depend upon DNA bending, controlled by proteins such as the high-mobility-group protein HMG-Y1 [4345]. The basic unit of such coordinated complexes has been called an 'enhanceosome'. The three NF-κB binding sites and the AP-1 binding site in the E-selectin promoter appear to fit this definition.

E-selectin transcription and AP-1 activation are both transient in TNF-treated HUVECs [57], but NF-κB activation is not [41]. A decrease in phospho-c-Jun/ATF2, resulting from shutting off of JNK activity, probably accounts for the termination of E-selectin transcription [57]. Once the gene turns off, E-selectin cannot be effectively reinduced by TNF without a rest period of 18–24 hours. During the refractory period, it can be reinduced by IL-1 or CD40 ligand, and reinduction correlates with the reactivation of JNK. Since JNK activation is mediated by TRAF proteins and since TNF, IL-1, and CD40 ligand all use distinct TRAF proteins (although CD40 ligand does recruit TRAF2 and TRAF6 as well as TRAF3 and TRAF5), an attractive explanation for receptor-specific desensitization is that specific TRAFs are somehow selectively inactivated. TRAF proteins contain RING domains that can act as ubiquitin E3 ligases [30], and it is possible that ubiquitination is involved in TRAF inactivation and is responsible for the reduction of JNK and AP-1 activity. This speculation is supported by the observation that TRAF activation by CD30 in T cells is terminated by TRAF ubiquitination and degradation [58].

In some cells, TNF signaling may involve signaling pathways in addition to those described above, including the activation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and protein kinase B (also known as Akt) [59]; activation of neutral or acidic sphingomyelinases to generate ceramide [60]; de novo sphingosine-1 phosphate (S-1P) synthesis [61]; and a Ras/Raf/ERK growth-control pathway [62]. My laboratory has shown that the Akt and ceramide pathways do not contribute to adhesion molecule expression in ECs [63, 64]. It is possible that the S-1P and Ras pathways do participate in ELAM regulation, but, if so, the biochemical links to ELAM gene transcription are unknown.

The cell biology of TNF signaling in ECs

The biochemical view of TNF signaling described above is well supported by genetic and molecular data. However, my colleagues and I believe that it is an incomplete description, because it does not consider the capacity of cells to regulate interactions of receptors and adaptor proteins through control of their subcellular localization. Much of our recent work has focused upon this aspect of TNF signaling. HUVECs have very little TNFR1 on their surface; the predominant surface receptor is TNFR2 [65, 66]. Although TNFR2 can directly bind TRAF2 (as well as TRAF1), it does not activate expression of adhesion molecules in these cells [19] (although it can do so, independently of ligand, when overexpressed) [67]. However, the presence of TNFR2 increases the cells' sensitivity to TNF [19], consistent with the hypothesis of ligand passing from a higher-affinity (TNFR2) to a lower-affinity (TNFR1) receptor [68].

When TNF binds to ECs, much of it is rapidly internalized. Most of the internalized ligand follows a coated-pit/coated-vesicle pathway, winding up in endosomal/lysosomal compartments [65]. TNFR2 shows a similar pattern of internalization, and it is likely that most TNF uptake is mediated via this nonsignaling receptor. Surprisingly, a significant fraction of internalized TNF molecules end up associated with mitochondria [69] and a third TNF-binding protein (of approximately 60 kDa) has been identified in the inner membrane of this organelle [69]. The complete identity of this molecule, the pathway by which TNF is transported to the mitochondria, and the function, if any, of mitochrondial TNF are still unknown.

In cultured HUVECs, as in many other cell types, the majority of TNFR1 molecules are located within the Golgi apparatus, retained there through an undefined interaction involving the DD [65, 66]. Until recently, the cellular and subcellular distributions of TNFR1 were known only from studies of cultured cells. Interestingly, in our initial analysis of a human tissue, namely the kidney, my colleagues and I found that TNFR1 was confined mainly to the Golgi apparatus of golmerular and peritubular capillary ECs [70], consistent with findings in studies in vitro (although the absence of TNFR1 in cell types other than ECs was unexpected). The role of the Golgi population of receptors is unknown. Plasma-membrane receptors can be internalized to an ER-like compartment in response to MAPK-mediated phosphorylation [71]. My colleagues at Cambridge University and I have recently found that Golgi receptors can be mobilized to appear on the cell surface by stimulation of cultured ECs with histamine (Jun Wang et al., unpublished observations).

When HUVECs are exposed to noxious stimuli, TNFR1 is shed from the surface [72]. This response is mediated by a protease inhibited by the compound TAPI (TACE protease inhibitor), and thus likely to be identical to TNF-α-converting enzyme (TACE). Shedding of receptors both desensitizes HUVECs to TNF [72] and serves as a source for soluble receptor (sTNFR), a natural inhibitor of TNF function [73]. The Golgi pool of receptors could thus be a reservoir for replacing shed receptors on the surface or could serve as a precursor pool for increasing the number of shed receptors. Our recent observations indicate that the same signals that mobilize receptors from the Golgi apparatus also favor receptor shedding, supporting the latter hypothesis (Jun Wang et al., unpublished observations). The importance of receptor shedding is highlighted by the finding that deficiencies in shedding receptors due to structural mutations in TNFR1 underlie TNFR-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), characterized by febrile episodes related to overreaction to TNF [74].

Even though only a minority of TNFR1 molecules are present on the plasma membrane, these molecules are critically important, because they are the only population that interacts with TRADD upon TNF treatment [75]. The cellular compartment(s) in which FADD, RIP, and TRAF2 are recruited to the TNFR1/TRADD complex is unknown. However, my colleagues and I and others have also observed that treatments that reduce membrane trafficking (e.g. endocytosis) also block TNF signaling [76, 77], and such observations imply that TNFR1 signaling complexes move from the plasma membrane in order to signal efficiently. My colleagues and I also have found that internalized receptors rapidly dissociate from TRADD, potentially limiting signaling [76].

A recent idea in receptor function is that activated receptors efficiently interact with adaptor proteins (and engage in crosstalk with other receptors) only when the relevant proteins are brought into proximity within cholesterol- and sphingomyelin-rich patches of the plasma membrane called lipid rafts [78, 79]. In ECs and certain other cell types, lipid rafts bind cytoskeletal scaffolding proteins called caveolins [80]. Caveolin binding causes the rafts to invaginate, forming specialized organelles known as caveolae. Although caveolae were first identified for their role in initiating transcellular vesicular transport, they are now (additionally) thought to facilitate signaling and permit receptor crosstalk. It is thus noteworthy that in ECs, TRAF2 is normally associated with caveolin-1 [67]. This finding suggests that the TNFR1 signaling complex, through binding of TRAF2, can be recruited via caveolin-1 to caveolae, where interactions with other signaling pathways may occur.

Concluding remarks

TNF-mediated induction of ELAM gene expression in vascular ECs is a central event in inflammation. Over the past 10 years, a reasonably good biochemical model has been developed of how TNF can activate two families of transcription factors, namely NF-κB and AP-1, whose activation is necessary for expression of ELAM genes. Our current focus of investigation is how this biochemical model operates within the living ECs, where various interactive components may either be segregated or brought together in response to ligand binding. The more complete picture of TNF signaling, which is being developed from these studies, may lead to new, more nuanced therapeutic approaches to regulating the inflammatory process.

Glossary of terms

ATF = activating transcription factor; DD = death domain; ELAM = endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule; FADD= Fas-associated DD protein; HUVEC = human umbilical-vein-derived endothelial cell; IKK = Iκ B kinase; JNK = c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAPK = mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK = MAPK kinase (also called MAP2K); MEKK= MEK kinase (also called MAP3K); RIP = receptor interacting protein; TRADD = TNF-receptor-associated death-domain protein; TRAF = TNF-receptor-associated factor; TRE = tetrahydrophorbol response element.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The studies presented from the laboratory have been supported by the NIH (HL36003). I would like to acknowledge members of my laboratory, past and present, who have contributed to this project, including Drs Tucker Collins, David Johnson, Lynne Lapierre, John Doukas, David Briscoe, Mark Slowik, Linda De Luca, Karin Karmann, Peter Petzelbauer, Wang Min, Lisa Madge, Martin Kluger, Xiao Feng, and Mary Lou Gaeta. Many of the studies described herein were performed in collaboration with Dr John R Bradley and his laboratory group at Cambridge University.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Yale University School of Medicine, Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine

References

  1. Etazioni A, Doerschuk CM, Harlan JM: Of man and mouse: leukocyte and endothelial adhesion molecule deficiencies. Blood. 1999, 94: 3281-3288.Google Scholar
  2. Cohnheim J: Lectures in General Pathology. Translated by Al McKee from the 2nd German edn. London: New Sydenham Society 1989
  3. Robbins SL, Angell M, Kumar V, Eds: Chapter 2: Inflammation and repair. In Basic Pathology, 4th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1981, 28-61
  4. Tonnesen MG, Smedly LA, Henson PM: Neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions. Modulation of neutrophil adhesiveness induced by complement fragments C5a and C5a des arg and formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1984, 74: 1581-1592.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjork J, Hugli TE, Smedegard G: Microvascular effects of anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a. J Immunol. 1985, 134: 1115-1119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bevilacqua MP, Pober JS, Wheeler ME, Cotran RS, Gimbrone MA: Interleukin-1 acts on cultured human vascular endothelial cells to increase the adhesion of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, monocytes and related leukocyte cell lines. J Clin Invest. 1985, 76: 2003-2011.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pober JS, Cotran RS: Cytokines and endothelial cell biology. Physiol Rev. 1990, 70: 427-451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Butcher EC: Leukocyte-endothelial cell recognition: three (or more) steps to specificity and diversity. Cell. 1991, 67: 1033-1036.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Springer TA: Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell. 1994, 76: 301-314.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Petzelbauer P, Bender J, Wilson J, Pober JS: Heterogeneity of dermal microvascular endothelial cell antigen expression and cytokine responsiveness in situ and in cell culture. J Immunol. 1993, 151: 5062-5072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Petzelbauer P, Pober JS, Keh A, Braverman IM: Inducibility and expression of microvascular endothelial adhesion molecules in lesional, perilesional, and uninvolved skin of psoriatic patients. J Invest Dermatol. 1994, 103: 300-305.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Briscoe DM, Cotran RS, Pober JS: Effects of tumor necrosis factor, lipopolysaccharide, and IL-4 on the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in vivo. Correlation with CD3+ T cell infiltration. J Immunol. 1992, 149: 2954-2960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Doukas J, Pober JS: IFN-gamma enhances endothelial activation induced by tumor necrosis factor but not IL-1. J Immunol. 1990, 145: 1727-1733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Thornhill MH, Wellicome SM, Mahiouz DL, Lanchbury JS, Kyan-Aung U, Haskard DO: Tumor necrosis factor combines with IL-4 or IFN-gamma to selectively enhance endothelial cell adhesiveness for T cells. The contribution of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1-dependent and -independent binding mechanisms. J Immunol. 1991, 146: 592-598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Austrup F, Vestweber D, Borges E, Lohning M, Brauer R, Herz U, Renz H, Hallmann R, Scheffold A, Radbruch A, Hamann A: P- and E-selectin mediate recruitment of T-helper-1 but not T-helper-2 cells into inflamed tissues. Nature. 1997, 385: 81-83. 10.1038/385081a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Douni E, Akassoglou K, Alexopoulou L, Georgopoulos S, Haralambous S, Hill S, Kassiotis G, Kontoyiannis D, Pasparakis M, Plows D, Probert L, Kollias G: Transgenic and knockout analyses of the role of TNF in immune regulation and disease pathogenesis. J Inflamm. 1995, 47: 27-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Feldmann M, Maini RN, Bondeson J, Taylor P, Foxwell BM, Brennan FM: Cytokine blockade in rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001, 490: 119-127.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins T, Read MA, Neish AS, Whitley MZ, Thanos D, Maniatis T: Transcriptional regulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules: NF-kappa B and cytokine-inducible enhancers. FASEB J. 1995, 9: 899-909.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Slowik MR, De Luca LG, Fiers W, Pober JS: Tumor necrosis factor activates human endothelial cells through the p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor but the p75 receptor contributes to activation at low tumor necrosis factor concentration. Am J Pathol. 1993, 143: 1724-1730.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Ledgerwood EC, Pober JS, Bradley JR: Recent advances in the molecular basis of TNF signal transduction. Lab Invest. 1999, 79: 1041-1050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Madge LA, Pober JS: TNF signaling in vascular endothelial cells. Exp Mol Pathol. 2001, 70: 317-325. 10.1006/exmp.2001.2368.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsu H, Xiong J, Goeddel DV: The TNF receptor 1-associated protein TRADD signals cell death and NF- kappa B activation. Cell. 1995, 81: 495-504.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Telliez JB, Xu GY, Woronicz JD, Hsu S, Wu JL, Lin L, Sukits SF, Powers R, Lin LL: Mutational analysis and NMR studies of the death domain of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-1. J Mol Biol. 2000, 300: 1323-1333. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3899.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sukits SF, Lin LL, Hsu S, Malakian K, Powers R, Xu GY: Solution structure of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 death domain. J Mol Biol. 2001, 310: 895-906. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4790.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang Y, Woronicz JD, Liu W, Goeddel DV: Prevention of constitutive TNF receptor 1 signaling by silencer of death domains. Science. 1999, 283: 543-546. 10.1126/science.283.5401.543.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hsu H, Shu HB, Pan MG, Goeddel DV: TRADD-TRAF2 and TRADD-FADD interactions define two distinct TNF receptor 1 signal transduction pathways. Cell. 1996, 84: 299-308.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsu H, Huang J, Shu HB, Baichwal V, Goeddel DV: TNF-dependent recruitment of the protein kinase RIP to the TNF receptor-1 signaling complex. Immunity. 1996, 4: 387-396.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelliher MA, Grimm S, Ishida Y, Kuo F, Stanger BZ, Leder P: The death domain kinase RIP mediates the TNF-induced NF-kappaB signal. Immunity. 1998, 8: 297-303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Park YC, Ye H, Hsia C, Segal D, Rich RL, Liou H-C, Myszka DG, Wu H: A novel mechanism of TRAF signaling revealed by structural and functional analyses of the TRADD-TRAF2 interaction. Cell. 2000, 101: 777-787.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lorick KL, Jensen JP, Fang S, Ong AM, Hatakeyama S, Weissman AM: RING fingers mediate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2)-dependent ubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 11364-11369. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11364.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yeh WC, Shahinian A, Speiser D, Kraunus J, Billia F, Wakeham A, de la Pompa JL, Ferrick D, Hum B, Iscove N, Ohashi P, Rothe M, Goeddel DV, Mak TW: Early lethality, functional NF-kappaB activation, and increased sensitivity to TNF-induced cell death in TRAF2-deficient mice. Immunity. 1997, 7: 715-725.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Tada K, Okazaki T, Sakon S, Kobarai T, Kurosawa K, Yamaoka S, Hashimoto H, Mak TW, Yagita H, Okumura K, Yeh WC, Nakano H: Critical roles of TRAF2 and TRAF5 in tumor necrosis factor-induced NF-kappa B activation and protection from cell death. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 36530-36534. 10.1074/jbc.M104837200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Devin A, Cook A, Lin Y, Rodriguez Y, Kelliher M, Liu Z: The distinct roles of TRAF2 and RIP in IKK activation by TNF-R1: TRAF2 recruits IKK to TNF-R1 while RIP mediates IKK activation. Immunity. 2000, 12: 419-429.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Xia Y, Makris C, Su B, Li E, Yang J, Nemerow GR, Karin M: MEK kinase 1 is critically required for c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation by proinflammatory stimuli and growth factor-induced cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 5243-5248. 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5243.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang J, Ling Y, Guo Z, Cheng J, Huang J, Deng L, Liao W, Chen Z, Liu Z-g, Su B: The essential role of MEKK3 in TNF-induced NF-κB activation. Nat Immunol. 2001, 2: 620-624. 10.1038/89769.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Karin M: The beginning of the end: IkappaB kinase (IKK) and NF-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 27339-27342. 10.1074/jbc.274.39.27339.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Tanaka M, Fuentes ME, Yamaguchi K, Durnin MH, Dalrymple SA, Hardy KL, Goeddel DV: Embryonic lethality, liver degeneration, and impaired NF-κB activation in IKK-b-deficient mice. Immunity. 1999, 10: 421-429.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Li ZW, Chu W, Hu Y, Delhase M, Deerinck T, Ellisman M, Johnson R, Karin M: The IKKbeta subunit of IkappaB kinase (IKK) is essential for nuclear factor kappaB activation and prevention of apoptosis. J Exp Med. 1999, 189: 1839-1845. 10.1084/jem.189.11.1839.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Rudolph D, Yeh WC, Wakeham A, Rudolph B, Nallainathan D, Potter J, Elia AJ, Mak TW: Severe liver degeneration and lack of NF-kappaB activation in NEMO/IKKgamma-deficient mice. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 854-862.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Baldwin AS: The NF-kappa B and I kappa B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996, 14: 649-683. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.649.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson DR, Douglas I, Jahnke A, Ghosh S, Pober JS: A sustained reduction in IkappaB-beta may contribute to persistent NF- kappaB activation in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 16317-16322. 10.1074/jbc.271.27.16317.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Spiecker M, Darius H, Liao JK: A functional role of I kappa B-epsilon in endothelial cell activation. J Immunol. 2000, 164: 3316-3322.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis H, Kaszubska W, DeLamarter JF, Whelan J: Cooperativity between two NF-kappa B complexes, mediated by high-mobility-group protein I(Y), is essential for cytokine-induced expression of the E-selectin promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1994, 14: 5701-5709.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Schindler U, Baichwal VR: Three NF-kappa B binding sites in the human E-selectin gene required for maximal tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1994, 14: 5820-5831.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitley MZ, Thanos D, Read MA, Maniatis T, Collins T: A striking similarity in the organization of the E-selectin and beta inter-feron gene promoters. Mol Cell Biol. 1994, 14: 6464-6475.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Shu HB, Agranoff AB, Nabel EG, Leung K, Duckett CS, Neish AS, Collins T, Nabel GJ: Differential regulation of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 gene expression by specific NF-kappa B subunits in endothelial and epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13: 6283-6289.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ahmad M, Marui N, Alexander RW, Medford RM: Cell type-specific transactivation of the VCAM-1 promoter through an NF-kappa B enhancer motif. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 8976-8983. 10.1074/jbc.270.15.8976.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Parry GC, Mackman N: A set of inducible genes expressed by activated human monocytic and endothelial cells contain kappa B-like sites that specifically bind c-Rel-p65 het-erodimers. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 20823-20825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Baud V, Karin M: Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor and its relatives. Trends Cell Biol. 2001, 11: 372-377. 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02064-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. De Luca LG, Johnson DR, Whitley MZ, Collins T, Pober JS: cAMP and tumor necrosis factor competitively regulate transcriptional activation through and nuclear factor binding to the cAMP-responsive element/activating transcription factor element of the endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 (E-selectin) promoter. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 19193-19196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Min W, Pober JS: TNF initiates E-selectin transcription in human endothelial cells through parallel TRAF-NF-kappa B and TRAF-RAC/CDC42-JNK-c-Jun/ATF2 pathways. J Immunol. 1997, 159: 3508-3518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Reimold AM, Grusby MJ, Kosaras B, Fries JW, Mori R, Maniwa S, Clauss IM, Collins T, Sidman RL, Glimcher MJ, Glimcher LH: Chondrodysplasia and neurological abnormalities in ATF-2-deficient mice. Nature. 1996, 379: 262-265. 10.1038/379262a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Stade BG, Messer G, Riethmuller G, Johnson JP: Structural characteristics of the 5' region of the human ICAM-1 gene. Immunobiology. 1990, 182: 79-87.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Cybulsky MI, Allan-Motamed M, Collins T: Structure of the murine VCAM1 gene. Genomics. 1993, 18: 387-391. 10.1006/geno.1993.1480.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Ahmad M, Theofanidis P, Medford RM: Role of activating protein-1 in the regulation of the vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 gene expression by tumor necrosis factor-. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 4616-4621. 10.1074/jbc.273.8.4616.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Gerritsen ME, Williams AJ, Neish AS, Moore S, Shi Y, Collins T: CREB-binding protein/p300 are transcriptional coactivators of p65. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997, 94: 2927-2932. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.2927.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Karmann K, Min W, Fanslow WC, Pober JS: Activation and homologous desensitization of human endothelial cells by CD40 ligand, tumor necrosis factor, and interleukin 1. J Exp Med. 1996, 184: 173-182.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Duckett CS, Thompson CB: CD30-dependent degradation of TRAF2: implications for negative regulation of TRAF signaling and the control of cell survival. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 2810-2821.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Ozes ON, Mayo LD, Gustin JA, Pfeffer SR, Pfeffer LM, Donner DB: NF-kappaB activation by tumour necrosis factor requires the Akt serine-threonine kinase. Nature. 1999, 401: 82-85. 10.1016/S0039-6028(97)00913-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Kolesnick RN, Kronke M: Regulation of ceramide production and apoptosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998, 60: 643-665. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.60.1.643.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Xia P, Gamble JR, Rye KA, Wang L, Hii CS, Cockerill P, Khew-Goodall Y, Bert AG, Barter PJ, Vadas MA: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces adhesion molecule expression through the sphingosine kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 14196-14201. 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14196.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu XS, Vanderziel C, Bennett CF, Monia BP: A role for c-Raf kinase and Ha-Ras in cytokine-mediated induction of cell adhesion molecules. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 33230-33238. 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33230.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Madge LA, Pober JS: A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway, activated by tumor necrosis factor or interleukin-1, inhibits apoptosis but does not activate NFkappaB in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 15458-15465. 10.1074/jbc.M001237200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Slowik MR, De Luca LG, Min W, Pober JS: Ceramide is not a signal for tumor necrosis factor-induced gene expression but does cause programmed cell death in human vascular endothelial cells. Circ Res. 1996, 79: 736-747.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Bradley JR, Thiru S, Pober JS: Disparate localization of 55-kd and 75-kd tumor necrosis factor receptors in human endothelial cells. Am J Pathol. 1994, 146: 27-32.Google Scholar
  66. Gaeta ML, Johnson DR, Kluger MS, Pober JS: The death domain of tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 is necessary but not sufficient for Golgi retention of the receptor and mediates receptor desensitization. Lab Invest. 2000, 80: 1185-1194.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Feng X, Gaeta ML, Madge LA, Yang JH, Bradley JR, Pober JS: Caveolin-1 associates with TRAF2 to form a complex that is recruited to tumor necrosis factor receptors. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 8341-8349. 10.1074/jbc.M007116200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Tartaglia LA, Pennica D, Goeddel DV: Ligand passing: the 75-kDa tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor recruits TNF for signaling by the 55-kDa TNF receptor. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 18542-18548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Ledgerwood EC, Prins JB, Bright NA, Johnson DR, Wolfreys K, Pober JS, O'Rahilly S, Bradley JR: Tumor necrosis factor is delivered to mitochondria where a tumor necrosis factor-binding protein is localized. Lab Invest. 1998, 78: 1583-1589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Al-Lamki RS, Wang J, Skepper JN, Thiru S, Pober JS, Bradley JR: Expression of tumor necrosis factor receptors in normal kidney and rejecting renal transplants. Lab Invest. 2001, 81: 1503-1515.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Cottin V, Van Linden A, Riches DW: Phosphorylation of tumor necrosis factor receptor CD120a (p55) by p42(MAPK/ERK2) induces changes in its subcellular localization. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 32975-32987. 10.1074/jbc.274.46.32975.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Madge LA, Sierra-Honigmann MR, Pober JS: Apoptosis-inducing agents cause rapid shedding of tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1). A nonpharmacological explanation for inhibition of TNF-mediated activation. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 13643-13649. 10.1074/jbc.274.19.13643.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Wallach D, Engelmann H, Nophar Y, Aderka D, Kemper O, Hornik V, Holtmann H, Brakebusch C: Soluble and cell surface receptors for tumor necrosis factor. Agents Actions Suppl. 1991, 35: 51-57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Galon J, Aksentijevich I, McDermott MF, O'Shea JJ, Kastner DL: TNFRSF1A mutations and autoinflammatory syndromes. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000, 12: 479-486. 10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00124-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Jones SJ, Ledgerwood EC, Prins JB, Savidge J, Johnson DR, Pober JS, Bradley JR: TNF recruits TRADD to the plasma membrane but not the trans-Golgi network, the principal subcellular location of TNF-R1. J Immunol. 1999, 162: 1042-1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Bradley JR, Johnson DR, Pober JS: Four different classes of inhibitors of receptor-mediated endocytosis decrease TNF-induced gene expression in human endothelial cells. J Immunol. 1993, 150: 5544-5555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Schutze S, Machleidt T, Adam D, Schwandner R, Wiegmann K, Kruse ML, Heinrich M, Wickel M, Kronke M: Inhibition of receptor internalization by monodansylcadaverine selectively blocks p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor death domain signaling. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 10203-10212. 10.1074/jbc.274.15.10203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Simons K, Toomre D: Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 1: 31-39. 10.1038/35036052.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Galbiati F, Razani B, Lisanti MP: Emerging themes in lipid rafts and caveolae. Cell. 2001, 106: 403-411.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Schlegel A, Lisanti MP: The caveolin triad: caveolae biogenesis, cholesterol trafficking, and signal transduction. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001, 12: 41-51. 10.1016/S1359-6101(00)00022-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2002