Volume 4 Supplement 3

The Scientific Basis of Rheumatology

Open Access

How are the regulators regulated? The search for mechanisms that impose specificity on induction of cell death and NF-κB activation by members of the TNF/NGF receptor family

  • David Wallach1Email author,
  • Thangavelu U Arumugam1,
  • Mark P Boldin1,
  • Giuseppina Cantarella2,
  • Koluman A Ganesh1,
  • Yuri Goltsev1,
  • Tanya M Goncharov1,
  • Andrew V Kovalenko1,
  • Akhil Rajput1,
  • Eugene E Varfolomeev1 and
  • Si Qing Zhang1
Arthritis Research & Therapy20024(Suppl 3):S189

DOI: 10.1186/ar585

Published: 9 May 2002

Chapter summary

Signals emanating from receptors of the tumor necrosis factor/nerve growth factor (TNF/NGF) family control practically all aspects of immune defense and, as such, constitute potential targets for therapeutic intervention through rational drug design. Indeed, arrest of these signals by blocking ligand–receptor interactions enables effective suppression of a variety of activities that are implicated in various pathologies, such as T and B lymphocyte activation and growth, inflammation, fibroblast proliferation, and cell death. To be therapeutically useful, however, inhibition of signaling should be restricted by determinants of specificity, at least to the same degree observed when blocking activation of individual receptors. In spite of their broad range of functions, receptors of the TNF/NGF family are known to activate just a few signaling pathways. Of these, the most extensively studied are the activation of the caspase protease cascade, which leads to cell death, and the activation of NF-κB (nuclear factor-κB) transcription factors through protein phosphorylation cascades. Until recently, most studies of the two pathways have solely focused on the core signaling complexes that are shared by the different receptors: death-inducing complexes containing the cysteine proteases caspase-8 and caspase-10, bound to the adapter protein MORT1/FADD (mediator of receptor-induced toxicity/Fas-associated DD protein), and the NF-κB-activating complex, composed of the protein kinases IKK1 (IκB kinase 1) and IKK2 (IκB kinase 2) and the regulatory subunit NEMO (NF-κB essential modulator; the 'IKK signalosome'). Knowledge has begun to emerge of additional molecules and mechanisms that affect these basic signaling complexes and impose specificity on their function.

Keywords

apoptosis caspase NF-κB signaling tumor necrosis factor

Introduction

The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ligand and TNF/nerve growth factor (NGF) receptor families provide a unique point of view of biological regulation. (For a list of alternative names of receptors and ligands, see website [1]. See Fig. 1 for a schematic presentation of the known interactions between them.) These receptors and ligands are expressed in almost all cells and trigger a wide range of different, in part contrasting, cellular activities [25]. They help to regulate practically every aspect of immune defense, as well as certain developmental processes. All of these activities are mediated by a unique set of apparently few signaling proteins, which are shared by the different receptors [6].
Figure 1

Schematic drawing of the known interactions between members of the TNF ligand family and members of the TNF/NGF receptor families. Death domains are indicated as black boxes (or gray boxes, in the cases of NGF-R and EDAR). EDAR, ectodysplasin-A receptor; NGF, nerve growth factor; NGF-R, receptor for nerve growth factor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Understanding how such a heterogeneous group of functions can be elicited by a limited number of signaling proteins and, just as importantly, how the signaling system 'decides' which of its potential downstream pathways will be activated in a given situation is not solely a matter of academic interest. As demonstrated by the efficacy of anti-TNF therapy in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis [7], understanding the mechanisms of action of the TNF/NGF receptor family at the molecular level bears immense therapeutic potential. Studies in our laboratory have helped to elucidate two aspects of specificity in the functioning of the signaling pathways: mechanisms that determine whether cell death or a noncytocidal effect is induced, and mechanisms that impose specificity of action on the enzymes that activate the highly pleiotropic nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) transcription factors.

A cell death pathway that is independent of, yet controlled by, gene activation

Several members of the TNF/NGF receptor family are capable of inducing cell death. Those doing so most effectively, collectively known as 'death receptors,' share an intracellular motif, the so-called 'death domain,' through which their cytotoxic activities are mediated. Much of our current understanding of their mode of toxicity arises out of studies of the earliest-known members of the TNF ligand family, TNF itself and lymphotoxin-α . Almost from the first, it was noted that the ability of these cytokines to kill cells is independent of protein synthesis, but, rather, is strongly potentiated by inhibitors of protein synthesis [810].

Once it became evident that this cytotoxicity is receptor mediated [11], it followed that the cytocidal effect is exerted by activation of death-inducing signaling proteins that pre-exist in the living cell. It also followed that there exist in cells protein-synthesis-dependent 'antideath' functions. One could further deduce from these early studies of TNF cytotoxicity that the protein-synthesis-dependent 'anti-death' functions are in part activated by TNF itself [12].

Current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of cell death induction by the death receptors enables delineation of a continuous pathway that begins with the triggering of receptor signaling by ligands and ends with certain specific morphological and functional manifestations of programmed cell death. Acting on the assumption that the apoptotic mechanism activated by the death receptors involves solely cellular components that have pre-existed in the cell before death is triggered, attempts to identify these components have centered on analyses of the protein–protein interactions initiated by the stimulated receptors.

Two-hybrid screens led firstly to the identification of three adapter proteins, MORT1/FADD [13, 14], TRADD [15], and RIP [16], all of which contain death domains that bind to the death domains in the receptors. Subsequent two-hybrid screens and analysis of the composition of the signaling complex associated with the death receptor Fas led to the identification of caspase-8 (MACH/FLICE [MORT1-associated CED3 homologue/FADD-like interleukin-1-converting enzyme]), a cysteine protease that is recruited to the receptor complex through its binding to MORT1/ FADD and, once activated there, initiates the cell death process [17, 18]. A close homologue of caspase-8, caspase-10, is similarly recruited and also serves to initiate the apoptotic process [1921].

Once activated, caspase-8 and caspase-10 activate other members of the caspase family, the so-called 'executioner caspases' such as caspase-3 and caspase-7, either by direct proteolytic processing of their precursors or indirectly, by triggering the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria: cytochrome c activates caspase-9, which in turn processes and activates caspase-3 and caspase-7. The 'executioner' caspases cleave target proteins that play critical roles in specific aspects of the death pathway. Two such examples are the processing of I-CAD/DFF-45 (inhibitor of caspase-activated deoxy-ribonuclease/45-kDa subunit of DNA fragmentation factor) that leads to DNA degradation [22] and the cleavage products of gelsoline, which participate in the process of membrane blebbing [23].

The straightforward nature of the aforementioned pathway (Fig. 2) highlights the need to clarify its regulation. If all that it takes for the death receptor to trigger cell death is just a short series of molecular interactions leading from receptor activation to the eventual death events, how is it that these same receptors so often elicit effects that are not at all cytotoxic, and may even stimulate cell growth?
Figure 2

Schematic drawing of the caspase pathway leading to cell death induction by members of the TNF receptor family. DD, death domain; DED, death-effector domain; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. For other abbreviations, see Glossary of terms.

Knowledge emerging from the many laboratories that have addressed this question implies that the 'decision' taken by the death receptors either to induce cell death or to exert noncytocidal effects is actually a summing up of multiple 'antideath' mechanisms that act at various mechanistic levels [24]. Some of the mechanisms that prevent the induction of cell death do so by arresting the recruitment of the death-signaling proteins, thus enabling the receptors to trigger other signaling molecules specifically involved in noncytocidalfunctions.

Quite interestingly, however, protective mechanisms that act by harnessing the same molecules that are dedicated to the induction of cell death to noncytocidal functions also seem to exist. Studies of the impact of targeted disruption of the genes encoding caspase-8 and its adapter protein, MORT1/FADD, revealed that apart from signaling for cell death, these same proteins also participate in the processes triggering development of the heart muscle in mammalian embryos and, at least in the case of MORT1/FADD, triggering lymphocytic growth as well [2527].

Knowledge of the mechanisms that direct these death molecules to noncytocidal functions is just beginning to emerge. One of the proteins shown to participate in this regulation is the enzymatically inactive caspase homologue cFLIP. Several studies indicate that this protein is recruited to the death receptors through MORT1/FADD, where it not only blocks the activation of caspases, but also, perhaps in conjunction with caspase-8, recruits additional signaling proteins (e.g. [28]).

Very recently, a caspase-8-binding protein called CARY (caspase-8 binding protein with RNA-binding motifs) that also seems to contribute to this regulation was discovered in our laboratory. We propose that this protein acts at a postreceptor level to regulate the activation of caspase-8 in the cytosol. Because CARY itself is cleaved by caspase-8, its impact on the apoptotic process is transient. Modulations of the level of CARY in the cytoplasm, either by its release from the nucleus, where large amounts of this protein are stored, or by phosphorylation of its caspase-8-mediated cleavage site, probably contribute to variations in the levels of active caspase molecules in the cell, which may well be a critical factor in determining whether or not the effects of caspase activity result in cell death (Fig. 3) (Goncharov MT et al., manuscript in preparation).
Figure 3

A hypothetical model describing the proposed role of CARY (caspase-8 binding protein with RNA-binding motifs) in controlling postreceptor cleavage of pro-caspase-8. For abbreviations, see Glossary of terms.

As mentioned above, it was evident from the earliest studies of cell death induction by TNF that while the death mechanism itself is independent of protein synthesis, the vulnerability of cells to TNF cytotoxicity is regulated by protein synthesis mechanisms and that the activities of at least some of the proteins protecting cells from TNF cytotoxicity are induced by TNF itself. A major advance towards understanding this regulatory process was the identification of the NF-κB transcription factor family as involved in the induction of cellular self-resistance to TNF cytotoxicity. The NF-κB transcription factors are known to be activated by almost all of the members of the TNF/NGF receptor family. Suppressing the activity of these transcription factors greatly sensitizes cells to the cytotoxic effects of TNF and various other agents (reviewed in [29]). Indeed, the genes for several of the proteins known to play a role in regulating the cytotoxic effects of members of the TNF/NGF family are regulated by NF-κB (e.g. [30]).

Specificity in the activation of NF-κB

An additional major challenge to our understanding of the nature of specificity in the signaling mechanisms of the TNF/NGF family of receptors is posed by the way they activate NF-κB. The core mechanism that activates NF-κB was recently elucidated and was found to consist of a macromolecular complex known as the IKK signalosome [31]. This complex is composed of two protein kinases, IKK1 and IKK2. Both kinases phosphorylate IκB (inhibitor of κB), an NF-κB inhibitory molecule, at specific sites, thus targeting it for ubiquitinilation and consequent proteasomal degradation.

Almost all of the receptors of the TNF/NGF family are able to activate NF-κB and involve this activation in a significant part of their gene regulatory effects, influencing a broad spectrum of cellular functions, only some of which concern cell death. Some of the NF-κB-regulated functions contribute to innate immunity and others to adaptive immunity; still others affect certain aspects of embryonic development. In every case, however, NF-κB activation by the receptors was found to be mediated by the same basic NF-κB-activating mechanism, the IKK signalosome.

Knowledge of the ways in which specificity is imposed on this core mechanism is only now beginning to emerge. Studies carried out mainly in the laboratory of David Goeddel have demonstrated involvement of two adapter proteins, TRAF2 and RIP, in the activation of NF-κB by TNF. TRAF2 is a member of a family of adapter proteins that shares among its members a C-terminal protein-binding motif, the TRAF domain [32]. Other members of the TRAF family are also known to participate in NF-κB activation by members of the TNF/NGF receptor family, as well as by some other receptors [33]. RIP is a death-domain-containing adapter protein that is recruited to the p55 TNF receptor by the binding of RIP to TRADD, another death-domain-containing protein, directly associated with this receptor [34, 35].

Our own attempts to contribute to the understanding of specificity in NF-κB activation have focused on exploring the identity of the signaling proteins acting downstream of these adapter proteins. By means of two-hybrid screens, we succeeded in identifying several novel proteins that bind to TRAF2 and, when overexpressed, modulate NF-κB activation, suggesting that they participate in the activation of NF-κB or in its regulation. One of the novel TRAF2-binding proteins, a protein kinase that we called NIK (NF-κB-inducing kinase) causes dramatic activation of NF-κB when overexpressed. On the other hand, over-expression of kinase-deficient mutants of this enzyme was found to block the activation of NF-κB by a variety of different inducers [36]. This indiscriminate inhibition implies that NIK is intimately associated with the core mechanism of NF-κB activation. Indeed, subsequent studies revealed that NIK binds directly to IKK1 and phosphorylates it [37].

Although there are still large gaps in our understanding of NIK function, the evidence that is accumulating indicates that this kinase possesses the ability to activate NF-κB in response to specific inducers and for specific purposes. Even though both the p55 TNF receptor and the lymphotoxin-β receptor involve TRAF2 in NF-κB activation, NIK is apparently activated only by the latter [38, 39]. Stimulation of the IKK signalosome by TNF leads to the activation of an NF-κB complex comprising the NF-κB subunits p65 (RelA) and p50, and of IκB, through phosphorylation of IκB induced by IKK2 (and consequent degradation of IκB). However, stimulation of the IKK signalosome by NIK also leads to the formation of another NF-κB subspecies, p52, through induced phosphorylation of a p52 precursor, p100 (NF-κB2) by IKK1 (and consequent proteolytic processing of p100) (Fig. 4) [40, 41].
Figure 4

A model depicting the nuclear-factor-κB-activating pathways described in this essay. For abbreviations, see Glossary of terms.

It is not yet known which additional inducers other than lymphotoxin-β involve NIK in their effect on NF-κB. However, the phenotypes of mice with a natural point mutation in NIK (the aly strain) and of mice with targeted disruption of the NIK gene indicate that NIK specifically mediates the effects of NF-κB-inducing agents that serve to regulate adaptive immunity [39, 42].

Among the proteins found in our two-hybrid screens to bind to the other NF-κB activating adapter protein, RIP, we focused on one, which we have initially called RAP2 (the second RIP-associated-protein found in our screens). Unlike NIK, RAP-2 was found to be devoid of any enzymatic function. Nevertheless, it dramatically modulated NF-κB activation. At low expression levels, it somewhat potentiated the activation of NF-κB by a variety of agents, while at higher expression levels, it strongly inhibited such activation.

This same protein was independently identified in several other laboratories, where it has been called NEMO, IKKγ, IKKAP1, and FIP3 [4346]. Studies coming out of these laboratories revealed that NEMO also binds to the two protein kinases comprising the IKK signalosome, and in fact constitutes an integral part of this macromolecular complex. The coincidental identification of NEMO through its binding to RIP and to the IKKs suggested that this protein may function as a molecular link between the IKK signalosome and specific inducers.

Indeed, in further analysis we found that NEMO is recruited to the TNF receptor complexes along with the other signalosome components [47]. It was later determined that a RIP homologue, RIP2/RICK, also binds to NEMO and recruits the signalosome to a RICK-activating intracellular receptor molecule, Nod1 [48]. Certain viral proteins have also been shown to regulate the signalo-some function by binding to NEMO [46, 49].

A more recent development in the study of NEMO function was the interesting finding that the C-terminal region of this protein, which is comprised of a zinc finger domain, is specifically involved in NF-κB activation by only some of the TNF receptor family members. In both mice and man, mutations in this region result in developmental deficiencies concerning the morphogenesis of hair, sweat glands, and teeth that strongly resemble the deficiencies observed when EDAR, a member of the TNF/NGF receptor family, or its ligand is mutated. Such mutations also result in a hyper-IgM syndrome, similar to that observed when the CD40 ligand is mutated. However, they seem to have little effect on NF-κB activation by TNF or bacterial lipopolysaccharide [50, 51]. By means of two-hybrid screens, we recently identified several proteins that specifically bind to the C-terminal region in NEMO and may participate in the differential response to NF-κB inducers mediated through this region.

It is gradually becoming evident that the activation of NF-κB is much more complex than was originally perceived soon after the discovery of the two kinases comprising the IKK signalosome. It is now known that NF-κB activation involves several different molecular events in both the cytosol and the nucleus and is affected by multiple regulators. Though our knowledge of these mechanisms is still fragmentary, one important implication of our current understanding is that, although the same core molecular complex, the IKK signalosome, participates in the activation of NF-κB by a variety of different inducers, this core complex displays sufficient complexity of interaction to allow for specificity of regulation.

Concluding remarks

With some regret, we are watching the gradual replacement of the simple and elegant initial models of signaling mechanisms for cell death and NF-κB activation by members of the TNF/NGF receptor family with models of much greater complexity. This loss of elegance is surely worthwhile, as the new, more complex models further our understanding of the ways in which the simple set of signaling molecules known to be activated by members of the TNF/NGF receptor family can coordinate the broad and heterogeneous range of activities controlled by these receptors, without apparent self-contradiction. In essence, we are gradually learning that this simple set of signaling molecules constitutes only the framework within which a much more complex set of molecules interacts, imposing specificity on its action.

There is also an obvious applicative value to this emerging complexity. Understanding the workings of biological regulation at the molecular level provides us with potential tools for medical manipulation of pathological deregulation. It was the search for molecules that provide self-resistance to TNF cytotoxicity that led researchers in our laboratory and several others to the discovery, more than a decade ago, of soluble TNF receptors in body fluids [5255]. This finding paved the way toward the current use of engineered soluble TNF receptors to block TNF function in diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, in which TNF is a causative factor. One can just as well expect that identification of regulatory molecules that impose specificity on the function of TNF/NGF receptors will lead to more refined disease therapies designed to specifically block the deleterious effects of these receptors, without obliterating the beneficial ones.

Glossary of terms

CARY = caspase-8-binding protein with RNA-binding motifs; DFF-45 = 45-kDa subunit of DNA fragmentation factor; FADD = Fas-associated death-domain protein; FIP3 = 14.7-K interacting protein 3; FLICE = FADD-like inteleukin-1-converting enzyme; I-CAD = inhibitor of caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease; IKK = IκB kinase; IKKAP1 = IκB kinase-associated protein 1; MACH = MORT1-associated CED3 homologue; MORT = mediator of receptor-induced toxicity; NEMO = NF-κB essential modulator; NIK = NF-κB-inducing kinase; RAP2 = RIP-associated protein; RICK = RIP-like interacting CLARP kinase; RIP = receptor-interacting protein; TRADD = TNF-receptor-1-associated death-domain protein; TRAF = TNF-receptor-associated factor.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

DW was supported in part by grants from Inter-Lab Ltd, Nes Ziona, Israel; Ares Trading SA, Switzerland; the European Commission Grant; the Joseph and Bessie Feinberg Foundation; and the German–Israeli Project Cooperation (DIP).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science
(2)
Institute of Pharmacology, University of Catania

References

  1. The Human Genome Organization Gene Nomenclature Committee: (HGNC Gene Family Nomenclature). [http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/nomenclature/genefamily/tnftop.html]
  2. Wallach D, Bigda J, Engelmann H: The TNF family and related molecules. In The Cytokine Network and Immune Functions. Edited by: Edited by Thèze J. 1999, Oxford: Oxford University Press;, 51-84.Google Scholar
  3. Locksley RM, Killeen N, Lenardo MJ: The TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies: integrating mammalian biology. Cell. 2001, 104: 487-501. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00237-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wallach D: TNF ligand and TNF/NGF receptor families. In Cytokine Reference. Edited by: Edited by Oppenheim JJ, Feldmann M. 2000, London: Academic Press;, 1565-1586.Google Scholar
  5. Wallach D: TNF ligand and TNF/NGF receptor families. In Cytokine Reference. Edited by: Edited by Oppenheim JJ, Feldmann M. London: Academic Press, [http://www.apnet.com/cytokinereference/]
  6. Wallach D, Varfolomeev EE, Malinin NL, Goltsev YV, Kovalenko AV, Boldin MP: Tumor necrosis factor receptor and Fas signaling mechanisms. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999, 17: 331-367. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.331.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldmann M, Maini RN: Anti-TNF alpha therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned?. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001, 19: 163-196. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.163.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Williams TW, Granger GA: Lymphocyte in vitro cytotoxicity: mechanism of human lymphotoxin-induced target cell destruction. Cell Immunol. 1973, 6: 171-185.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosenau W, Goldberg ML, Burke GC: Early biochemical alterations induced by lymphotoxin in target cells. J Immunol. 1973, 111: 1128-1135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruff MR, Gifford GE: Rabbit tumor necrosis factor: mechanism of action. Infect Immun. 1981, 31: 380-385.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Engelmann H, Holtmann H, Brakebusch C, Shemer Avni Y, Sarov I, Nophar Y, Hadas E, Leitner O, Wallach D: Antibodies to a soluble form of a tumor necrosis factor receptor have TNF-like activity. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 14497-14504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wallach D: Preparations of lymphotoxin induce resistance to their own cytotoxic effect. J Immunol. 1984, 132: 2464-2469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Boldin MP, Varfolomeev EE, Pancer Z, Mett IL, Camonis JH, Wallach D: A novel protein that interacts with the death domain of Fas/APO1 contains a sequence motif related to the death domain. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 7795-7798. 10.1074/jbc.270.14.7795.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chinnalyan AM, O'Rourke K, Tewari M, Dixit VM: FADD, a novel death domain-containing protein, interacts with the death domain of Fas and initiates apoptosis. Cell. 1995, 81: 505-512. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90071-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsu H, Xiong J, Goeddel DV: The TNF receptor 1-associated protein TRADD signals cell death and NF-kappa B activation. Cell. 1995, 81: 495-504. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90070-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Stanger BZ, Leder P, Lee TH, Kim E, Seed B: RIP: a novel protein containing a death domain that interacts with Fas/APO-1 (CD95) in yeast and causes cell death. Cell. 1995, 81: 513-523. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90072-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Boldin MP, Goncharov TM, Goltsev YV, Wallach D: Involvement of MACH, a novel MORT1/FADD-interacting protease, in Fas/APO1- and TNF receptor-induced cell death. Cell. 1996, 85: 803-815. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81265-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Muzio M, Chinnaiyan AM, Kischkel FC, O'Rourke K, Shevchenko A, Ni , Scaffidi C, Bretz JD, Zhang M, Gentz R, Mann M, Krammer PH, Peter ME, Dixit VM: FLICE, a novel FADD-homologous ICE/CED-3-like protease, is recruited to the CD95 (Fas/APO-1) death–inducing signaling complex. Cell. 1996, 85: 817-827. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81266-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Vincenz C, Dixit VM: Fas-associated death domain protein interleukin-1beta-converting enzyme 2 (FLICE2), an ICE/Ced-3 homologue, is proximally involved in CD95- and p55-mediated death signaling. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 6578-6583. 10.1074/jbc.272.15.9621.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kischkel FC, Hellbardt S, Behrmann I, Germer M, Pawlita M, Krammer PH, Peter ME: Cytotoxicity-dependent APO-1 (Fas/CD95)-associated proteins form a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) with the receptor. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 5579-5588.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang J, Chun HJ, Wong W, Spencer DM, Lenardo MJ: Caspase-10 is an initiator caspase in death receptor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 13884-13888. 10.1073/pnas.241358198.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sakahira H, Enari M, Nagata S: Cleavage of CAD inhibitor in CAD activation and DNA degradation during apoptosis. Nature. 1998, 391: 96-99. 10.1038/34214.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kothakota S, Azuma T, Reinhard C, Klippel A, Tang J, Chu K, McGarry TJ, Kirschner MW, Koths K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Williams LT: Caspase-3-generated fragment of gelsolin: effector of morphological change in apoptosis. Science. 1997, 278: 294-28. 10.1126/science.278.5336.294.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wallach D, Kovalenko AV, Varfolomeev EE, Boldin MP: Death-inducing functions of ligands of the tumor necrosis factor family: a Sanhedrin verdict. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998, 10: 279-288. 10.1016/S0952-7915(98)80166-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Varfolomeev EE, Schuchmann M, Luria V, Chiannilkulchai N, Beckmann JS, Mett IL, Rebrikov D, Brodianski VM, Kemper OC, Kollet O, Lapidot T, Soffer D, Sobe T, Avraham KB, Goncharov T, Holtmann H, Lonai P, Wallach D: Targeted disruption of the mouse Caspase 8 gene ablates cell death induction by the TNF receptors, Fas/Apo1, and DR3 and is lethal prenatally. Immunity. 1998, 9: 267-276.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Yeh W, de la Pompa JL, McCurrach ME, Shu H, Elia AJ, Shahinian A, Ng M, Wakeham A, Khoo W, Mitchell K, El-Deiry WS, Lowe SW, Goeddel DV, Mak TW: FADD: essential for embryo development and signaling from some, but not all, inducers of apoptosis. Science. 1998, 279: 1954-1958. 10.1126/science.279.5358.1954.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang J, Cado D, Chen A, Kabra NH, Winoto A: Fas-mediated apoptosis and activation-induced T-cell proliferation are defective in mice lacking FADD/Mort1. Nature. 1998, 392: 296-300. 10.1038/32681.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kataoka T, Budd RC, Holler N, Thome M, Martinon F, Irmler M, Burns K, Hahne M, Kennedy N, Kovacsovics M, Tschopp J: The caspase-8 inhibitor FLIP promotes activation of NF-kappaB and Erk signaling pathways. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 640-648. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00512-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wallach D: Cell death induction by TNF: a matter of self control. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997, 22: 107-109. 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01015-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Micheau O, Lens S, Gaide O, Alevizopoulos K, Tschopp J: NF-kappaB signals induce the expression of c-FLIP. Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 21: 5299-5305. 10.1128/MCB.21.16.5299-5305.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Karin M, Ben-Neriah Y: Phosphorylation meets ubiquitination: the control of NF-[kappa]B activity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000, 18: 621-663. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.621.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothe M, Wong SC, Henzel WJ, Goeddel DV: A novel family of putative signal transducers associated with the cytoplasmic domain of the 75 kDa tumor necrosis factor receptor. Cell. 1994, 78: 681-692.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wajant H, Henkler F, Scheurich P: The TNF-receptor-associated factor family: scaffold molecules for cytokine receptors, kinases and their regulators. Cell Signal. 2001, 13: 389-400. 10.1016/S0898-6568(01)00160-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ting AT, Pimentel-Muinos FX, Seed B: RIP mediates tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 activation of NF-kappaB but not Fas/APO-1-initiated apoptosis. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 6189-6196.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelliher MA, Grimm S, Ishida Y, Kuo F, Stanger BZ, Leder P: The death domain kinase RIP mediates the TNF-induced NF-kappaB signal. Immunity. 1998, 8: 297-303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Malinin NL, Boldin MP, Kovalenko AV, Wallach D: MAP3K-related kinase involved in NF-kappaB induction by TNF, CD95 and IL-1. Nature. 1997, 385: 540-544. 10.1038/385540a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Régnier CH, Song HY, Gao X, Goeddel DV, Cao Z, Rothe M: Identification and characterization of an IkB kinase. Cell. 1997, 90: 373-383. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80344-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsushima A, Kaisho T, Rennert PD, Nakano H, Kurosawa K, Uchida D, Takeda K, Akira S, Matsumoto M: Essential role of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB-inducing kinase and inhibitor of kappaB (IkappaB) kinase alpha in NF-kappaB activation through lymphotoxin beta receptor, but not through tumor necrosis factor receptor I. J Exp Med. 2001, 193: 631-636. 10.1084/jem.193.5.631.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Yin L, Wu L, Wesche H, Arthur CD, White JM, Goeddel DV, Schreiber RD: Defective lymphotoxin-beta receptor-induced NF-kappaB transcriptional activity in NIK-deficient mice. Science. 2001, 291: 2162-2165. 10.1126/science.1058453.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Xiao G, Harhaj EW, Sun SC: NF-kappaB-inducing kinase regulates the processing of NF-kappaB2 p100. Mol Cell. 2001, 7: 401-409. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00187-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Senftleben U, Cao Y, Xiao G, Greten FR, Krahn G, Bonizzi G, Chen Y, Hu Y, Fong A, Sun SC, Karin M: Activation by IKKalpha of a second, evolutionary conserved, NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Science. 2001, 293: 1495-1499. 10.1126/science.1062677.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Shinkura R, Kitada K, Matsuda F, Tashiro K, Ikuta K, Suzuki M, Kogishi K, Serikawa T, Honjo T: Alymphoplasia is caused by a point mutation in the mouse gene encoding Nf-kappa b-inducing kinase. Nat Genet. 1999, 22: 74-77. 10.1038/8780.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Yamaoka S, Courtois G, Bessia C, Whiteside ST, Weil R, Agou F, Kirk HE, Kay RJ, Israel A: Complementation cloning of NEMO, a component of the IkappaB kinase complex essential for NF-kappaB activation. Cell. 1998, 93: 1231-1240. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81466-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Rothwarf DM, Zandi E, Natoli G, Karin M: IKK-gamma is an essential regulatory subunit of the IkappaB kinase complex. Nature. 1998, 395: 297-300. 10.1038/26261.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Mercurio F, Murray BW, Shevchenko A, Bennett BL, Young DB, Li JW, Pascual G, Motiwala A, Zhu HI, Mann M, Manning AM: kappaB kinase (IKK)-associated protein 1, a common component of the heterogeneous IKK complex. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19: 1526-1538.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Li Y, Kang J, Friedman J, Tarassishin L, Ye J, Kovalenko A, Wallach D, Horwitz MS: Identification of a cell protein (FIP-3) as a modulator of NF-kappaB activity and as a target of an adenovirus inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 1042-1047. 10.1073/pnas.96.3.1042.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang SQ, Kovalenko A, Cantarella G, Wallach D: Recruitment of the IKK signalosome to the p55 TNF receptor: RIP and A20 bind to NEMO (IKKgamma) upon receptor stimulation. Immunity. 2000, 12: 301-311.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Inohara N, Koseki T, Lin J, del Peso L, Lucas PC, Chen FF, Ogura Y, Nunez G: An induced proximity model for NF-kappa B activation in the Nod1/RICK and RIP signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 27823-27831.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Harhaj EW, Sun SC: IKKgamma serves as a docking subunit of the IkappaB kinase (IKK) and mediates interaction of IKK with the human T-cell leukemia virus Tax protein. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 22911-22914. 10.1074/jbc.274.33.22911.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Jain A, Ma CA, Liu S, Brown M, Cohen J, Strober W: Specific missense mutations in NEMO result in hyper-IgM syndrome with hypohydrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Nat Immunol. 2001, 2: 223-228. 10.1038/85277.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Doffinger R, Smahi A, Bessia C, Geissmann F, Feinberg J, Durandy A, Bodemer C, Kenwrick S, Dupuis-Girod S, Blanche S, Wood P, Rabia SH, Headon DJ, Overbeek PA, Le Deist F, Holland SM, Belani K, Kumararatne DS, Fischer A, Shapiro R, Conley ME, Reimund E, Kalhoff H, Abinun M, Munnich A, Israel A, Courtois G, Casanova JL: X-linked anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia with immunodeficiency is caused by impaired NF-kappaB signaling. Nat Genet. 2001, 27: 277-285. 10.1038/85837.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Engelmann H, Aderka D, Rubinstein M, Rotman D, Wallach D: A tumor necrosis factor-binding protein purified to homogeneity from human urine protects cells from tumor necrosis factor toxicity. J Biol Chem. 1989, 264: 11974-11980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Olsson I, Lantz M, Nilsson E, Peetre C, Thysell H, Grubb A, Adolf G: Isolation and characterization of a tumor necrosis binding protein from urine. Eur J Haematol. 1989, 42: 270-275.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Seckinger P, Isaaz S, Dayer JM: Purification and biologic characterization of a specific tumor necrosis factor a inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 1989, 264: 11966-11973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Engelmann H, Novick D, Wallach D: Two tumor necrosis factor binding proteins purified from human urine. Evidence for immunological cross reactivity with cell surface tumor-necrosis-factor receptors. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 1531-1536.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2002