Open Access

Rheumatoid arthritis viewed using a headache paradigm

  • Rikard Holmdahl1
Arthritis Research & Therapy20002:169

DOI: 10.1186/ar82

Received: 4 February 2000

Accepted: 1 March 2000

Published: 6 April 2000

Abstract

Results and new hypotheses in animal models often stimulate development of new paradigms in how we view rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The complexity of RA does, however, eventually lead to the rejection of these hypotheses. Here, it is argued that the large number of so-far described animal models, when taken together, also reveals a complex disease. Fortunately, detailed study of each of the animal models will reveal this complexity, and may also be helpful in elucidating the complexity of the human disease. Benoist and Mathis [1] recently contributed a new animal model in which an autoimmune response to a ubiquitous antigen leads to an antibody-mediated inflammatory attack in the joints. It is argued that this new model, as with other animal models, is unlikely to explain RA, but it will add to the tools available to reveal the complexity of RA.

Keywords

animal models genetics pathogenic antibodies rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

RA as diagnosed by the American Rheumatism College (ARC) criteria is a common disease, estimated to affect 0.5 to 1% of the world's population. Its relatively high frequency is evidence of a complex etiology and pathogenesis. RA is probably not one disease but, rather, a syndrome caused by several widely different pathologic processes. In this respect, RA could be likened to headache. No one would seriously think of trying to find a single explanation for headache. Rather, widely divergent causes, such as stress, migraine, or brain tumors, would quite rapidly be seen to be associated with quite different diseases. Similarly, it may be time to start thinking of a variety of different pathways leading to RA rather than searching for one single explanation.

Need for variety of animal models

Likewise, more than one animal model for RA is needed. More and more kinds of manipulation, genetic or environmental, lead to arthritis in experimental animals. Thus, arthritis can be induced by the injection of live bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus [2] or Borrelia burgdorferi [3]; of bacterial cell-wall fragments, such as in streptococcal-induced arthritis [4] and in mycobacterium adjuvant-induced arthritis [5], or of purified bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharide [6] or muramyl dipeptide [7]. Arthritis can also be induced by the injection of various exogenous or endogenous oils permeable in cell membranes, such as mineral oil, pristane, squalen, or C16-C17 fatty acids [8,9,10,11,12], or by immunization with ubiquitous antigens such as C1q [13] or gp39 [14], or with cartilage proteins such as type II collagen [15], type XI collagen [16], cartilage oligomeric matrix protein [17], aggrecan [18], or aggrecan link protein [19]. Arthritis can also develop after induction of immune complexes in the joint [20], after transfer of cartilage-specific antibodies [21], or after transfer of activated T cells [22]. Moreover, it may develop during the induction of a graft-versus-host disease. Arthritis also develops spontaneously in normal inbred strains [23,24,25] or in genetically manipulated strains that overexpress foreign proteins, such as the human T cell leukemia virus-I glycoprotein [26,27], molecules of the human major histocompatibility complex [28], or inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha [29]. Adding to this list, it has now been reported that expression of a T-cell receptor encoding for glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) will lead to arthritis through the production of antibodies specific for the same antigen [30].

All these models constitute an extremely valuable asset for the analysis of different pathways leading to arthritis. Most of these models use different arthritogenic pathways, and there are arguments in support of the existence of each of them for studies of RA.

Uses and limitations of the new GPI model

The newly described model in which antibodies specific for GPI induce acute arthritis adds to our arsenal and will be very useful for analyzing downstream mechanisms leading to arthritis. Although there is no evidence that GPI antibodies are found in humans, the availability of antibodies that readily induce arthritis is useful for understanding effector mechanisms. Furthermore, the main component of acute arthritis in the widely used collagen-induced arthritis model most likely mimics the same pathway [21,31,32,33]. An essential part is mediated by antibodies binding to the cartilage surface and through complement and macrophage IgGFc-receptor-dependent pathways initiating arthritis in the joints.

The descriptions of the arthritides induced in the GPI-antibody model and in the type II collagen-antibody model do not seem to differ in any essential point, although further study will probably reveal some differences. One difference is certainly the target epitope. The epitopes in the type II collagen-antibody model are definitely type II collagen in the cartilage [34,35], though the precise epitopes and mechanisms are not fully clarified, whereas in the GPI model the target epitope in situ has not yet been demonstrated. GPI may be exposed extracellularly in the joints, or there may be a joint cross-reactive neo-epitope that attracts the binding of the antibodies.

It is less likely that the GPI model will provide information on the upstream initiation of arthritis. By chance, researchers have found many starting points for the triggering of arthritis in animal models, as mentioned above. The upstream events, or etiology, of arthritis are likely to be more divergent than the downstream effects that are defined by the ARC criteria. It seems more fruitful to find the most important springs by starting downstream and following the river upstream.

Need for a new paradigm

It is time to change the paradigm for our thinking about the causes of RA. I certainly agree that pathways involving pathogenic antibodies have more recently been lost sight of in RA research and that lessons from the collagen-induced arthritis model, as well as from the more recently described GPI model, should be taken into account, particularly as corresponding anti-type II collagen antibody reactivities in humans have been identified [36,37]. However, there have been some disappointments when premature or misinterpreted findings from animal models have been seen as offering an explanation for RA: the induction of arthritis with T cells reactive to mycobacterium heat-shock proteins, a pathogenic oligoclonal T-cell repertoire induced by superantigens, regulatory effects by class II molecules, oral bystander vaccination, and cartilage-specific T cells primed in the joints, just to mention some examples.

Conclusion

It is time to accept that RA is a complex disease with multiple causes and pathways. Recent advances will now enable us to address these complexities and put forward new hypotheses. Particularly exciting is the possibility of understanding complex diseases through their genetic susceptibility [38,39,40] - why certain subtypes of RA develop in some but not other individuals due to their genetic makeup and their environmental exposure. Different diseases, with different pathways, will eventually be identified in what we today call 'RA'. There are strong reasons to believe that the genetic makeup and the selective forces leading to arthritis are conserved between rodents and humans. Furthermore, rodents can be used to express the relevant human genes and test their importance [41,42,43]. Animal models such as this with well-characterized, testable pathways are excellent tools in this endeavor, and the GPI model is an important addition to the arsenal.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Lund University

References

  1. Benoist C, Mathis D: A revival of the B cell paradigm for rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis?. Arthritis Res. 2000, 2: 90-94.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdelnour A, Bremell T, Holmdahl R, Tarkowski A: Clonal expansion of T lymphocytes causes arthritis and mortality in mice infected with toxic shock syndrome toxin-1-producing staphylococci. Eur J Immunol. 1994, 24: 1161-1166.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Schaible UE, Kramer MD, Wallich R: Experimental Borrelia burgdorferi infection in inbred mouse strains: antibody response and association H-2 genes with resistance and susceptibility to development of arthritis. Eur J Immunol. 1991, 21: 2397-2405.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cromartie WJ, Craddock JG, Schwab JH, Anderle SK, Yang CH: Arthritis in rats after systemic injection of streptococcal cells or cell walls. J Exp Med. 1977, 146: 1585-1602.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Pearson CM: Development of arthritis, periarthritis and periostitis in rats given adjuvants. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1956, 91: 95-101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Terato K, Ye XJ, Miyahara H: Induction by chronic autoimmune arthritis in DBA/1 mice by oral administration of type II collagen and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Br J Rheumatol. 1996, 35: 828-838.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang YH, Pearson CM, Chedid L: Adjuvant polyarthritis. V. Induction by N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine, the smallest peptide subunit of bacterial peptidoglycan. J Exp Med. 1981, 153: 1021-1026.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Holmdahl R, Goldschmidt TJ, Kleinau S: Arthritis induced in rats with adjuvant oil is a genetically restricted, alpha beta T-cell dependent autoimmune disease. Immunology. 1992, 76: 197-202.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kleinau S, Klareskog L: Oil-induced arthritis in DA rats. Passive transfer by T cells but not with serum. J Autoimmun. 1993, 6: 449-458. 10.1006/jaut.1993.1037.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lorentzen JC: Identification of arthritogenic adjuvants of self and foreign origin. Scand J Immunol. 1999, 1: 45-50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Vingsbo C, Sahlstrand P, Brun JG: Pristane-induced arthritis in rats: a new model for rheumatoid arthritis with a chronic disease course influenced by both major histocompatibility complex and non-major histocompatibility complex genes. Am J Pathol. 1996, 149: 1675-1683.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang YH, Pearson CM, Abe C: Adjuvant polyarthritis. IV. Induction by a synthetic adjuvant: Immunologic, histopathologic, and other studies. Arthritis Rheum. 1980, 23: 62-71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Trinder PKE, Maeurer MJ, Stoerkel SS, Loos M: Altered (oxidized) C1q induces a rheumatoid arthritis-like destructive and chronic inflammation in joint structures in arthritis-susceptible rats. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1997, 82: 149-156. 10.1006/clin.1996.4293.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Verheijden GF, Rijnders AW, Bos E: Human cartilage glycoprotein-39 as a candidate autoantigen in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40: 1115-1125.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Trentham DE, Townes AS, Kang AH: Autoimmunity to type II collagen: an experimental model of arthritis. J Exp Med. 1977, 146: 857-868.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Morgan K, Evans HB, Firth SA: 1α, 2α, 3α collagen is arthritogenic. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983, 42: 680-683.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Carlsén S, Hansson AS, Olsson H: Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP)-induced arthritis in rats. Clin Exp Immunol. 1998, 114: 477-484.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Glant TT, Mikecz K, Arzoumanian A, Poole AR: Proteoglycan-induced arthritis in Balb/c mice. Arthritis Rheum. 1987, 30: 201-212.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang Y, Guerassimov A, Leroux JY: Induction of arthritis in BALB/c mice by cartilage link protein: involvement of distinct regions recognized by T and B lymphocytes. Am J Pathol. 1998, 153: 1283-1291.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Beuningen HM, Van Den Berg WB, Schalkwijk J: Age- and sex-related differences in antigen-induced arthritis in C57BI/10 mice. Arthritis Rheum. 1989, 32: 789-794.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Stuart JM, Cremer MA, Townes AS, Kang AH: Type II collagen induced arthritis in rats. Passive transfer with serum and evidence that IgG anticollagen antibodies can cause arthritis. J Exp Med. 1982, 155: 1-16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Taurog JD, Sandberg GP, Mahowald ML: The cellular basis of adjuvant arthritis. I. Enhancement of cellmediated passive transfer by concanavalin A and by immunosuppressive pretreatment of the recipient. Cell Immunol. 1983, 75: 271-282.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmdahl R, Jansson L, Andersson M, Jonsson R: Genetic, hormonal and behavioral influence on spontaneously developing arthritis in normal mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1992, 88: 467-472.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bouvet JP, Couderc J, Bouthillier Y: Spontaneous rheumatoid-like arthritis in a line of mice sensitive to collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990, 33: 1716-1722.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Corthay A, Hansson A, Holmdahl R: Spontaneous arthritis in DBA/1 mouse is characterized by enthesopathy that is not dependent on T cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2000,Google Scholar
  26. Iwakura Y, Tosu M, Yoshida E: Induction of inflammatory arthropathy resembling rheumatoid arthritis in mice transgenic for HTLV-I. Science. 1991, 253: 1026-1028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Yamazaki H, Ikeda H, Ishizu A: A wide spectrum of collagen vascular and autoimmune diseases in transgenic rats carrying the env-pX gene of human T lymphocyte virus type I. Int Immunol. 1997, 9: 339-346.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hammer RE, Maika SD, Richardson JA: Spontaneous inflammatory disease in transgenic rats expressing HLA-B27 and human beta2m: An animal model of HLA-B27-associated human disorders. Cell. 1990, 63: 1099-1112.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Keffer J, Probert L, Cazlaris H: Transgenic mice expressing human tumour necrosis factor: a predictive genetic model of arthritis. EMBO J. 1991, 10: 4025-4031.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsumoto I, Staub A, Benoist C, Mathis D: Arthritis provoked by linked T and B cell recognition of a glycolytic enzyme. Science. 1999, 286: 1732-1735. 10.1126/science.286.5445.1732.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Watson WC, Brown PS, Pitcock JA, Townes AS: Passive transfer studies with type II collagen antibody in B10.D2/old and new line and C57BI/6 normal and beige (Chediak-Higashi) strains: evidence of important roles for C5 and multiple inflammatory cell types in the development of erosive arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987, 30: 460-465.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Holmdahl R, Vingsbo C, Mo J: Chronicity of tissue-specific experimental autoimmune disease. A role for B cells?. Immunol Rev. 1995, 144: 109-135.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Holmdahl R, Jansson L, Larsson A, Jonsson R: Arthritis in DBA/1 mice induced with passively transferred type II collagen immune serum. Immunohistopathology and serum levels of anti-type II collagen auto-antibodies. Scand J Immunol. 1990, 31: 147-157.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Terato K, Hasty KA, Reife RA: Induction of arthritis with monoclonal antibodies to collagen. J Immunol. 1992, 148: 2103-2108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Schulte S, Unger C, Mo JA: Arthritis-related B cell epitopes in collagen II are conformation-dependent and sterically privileged in accessible sites of cartilage collagen fibrils. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 1551-1561.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Tarkowski A, Klareskog L, Carlsten H: Secretion of antibodies to types I and II collagen by synovial tissue cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1989, 32: 1087-1092.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Cook AD, Stockman A, Brand CA: Antibodies to type II collagen and HLA disease susceptibility markers in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999, 42: 2569-2576.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Aaltonen J, Björses P, Perheentupa J: An autoimmune disease, APECED, caused by mutations in a novel gene featuring two PHD-type zinc-finger domains. Nature Genet. 1997, 17: 399-403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Vingsbo-Lundberg C, Nordquist N, Olofsson P: Genetic control of arthritis onset, severity and chronicity in a model for rheumatoid arthritis in rats. Nature Genet. 1998, 20: 401-404.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Remmers EF, Longman RE, Du Y: A genome scan localizes five non-MHC loci controlling collagen-induced arthritis in rats. Nature Genet. 1996, 14: 82-85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosloniec EF, Brand DD, Myers LK: An HLA-DR1 transgene confers susceptibility to collagen-induced arthritis elicited with human type II collagen. J Exp Med. 1997, 185: 1113-1122.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Madsen LS, Andersson EC, Jansson L: A humanized model for multiple sclerosis using HLA-DR2 and a human T-cell receptor. Nature Genetics. 1999, 23: 343-347. 10.1038/15525.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Andersson EC, Hansen BE, Jacobsen H: Definition of MHC and T cell receptor contacts in the HLA-DR4 restricted immunodominant epitope in type II collagen and characterization of collagen-induced arthritis in HLA-DR4 and human CD4 transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 7574-7579.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Current Science Ltd 2000