Skip to main content

Table 3 Change in cartilage thickness (ThCtAB) over one year in participants with various grades of medial femorotibial osteophytes (mOP) at baseline

From: Relationship of compartment-specific structural knee status at baseline with change in cartilage morphology: a prospective observational study using data from the osteoarthritis initiative

 

mOP 0 (n = 42)

mOP 1 (n = 53)

mOP 2 (n = 21)

mOP 3 (n = 40)

 

MC%

SRM

P (FUvs.BL)

MC%

SRM

P (FUvs.BL)

MC%

SRM

P (FUvs.BL)

MC%

SRM

P (FUvs.BL)

MT

-1.1

-0.46

0.00475

0.0

0.01

0.94330

-1.0

-0.24

0.28311

-0.3

-0.10

0.52858

cMF

-1.9

-0.35

0.02844

-1. 7

-0.31

0.02878

-2.6

-0.40

0.08254

-1.8

-0.21

0.18398

MFTC

-1.5

-0.46

0.00509

-0.9

-0.23

0.10443

-1.8

-0.39

0.09264

-1.0

-0.24

0.14224

cMT

-1.5

-0.42

0.00889

0.0

-0.01

0.94955

-1.7

-0.31

0.16985

-0.7

-0.15

0.35837

ccMF

-2.6

-0.33

0.04059

-2.9

-0.40

0.00582

-3.5

-0.36

0.11512

-2.3

-0.20

0.21479

cMFTC

-2.1

-0.42

0.00987

-1.4

-0.31

0.02639

-2.5

-0.39

0.08638

-1.4

-0.24

0.14412

  1. The P value indicates the level of significance for changes between year one follow up (FU) versus baseline (BL) data using a paired t-test.
  2. ccMF = central subregion of the weight bearing medial femoral condyle; cMF = weight bearing medial femoral condyle; cMFTC = central medial femorotibial compartment; cMT = central subregion of the medial tibia; MC% = mean change (in %); MFTC = medial femorotibial compartment; MT = medial tibia; SRM = standardized response mean (mean change/SD of change).
Back to article page

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us