Skip to main content

Table 1 Gain of a major response by switching between different available biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis

From: ACR70-disease activity score remission achievement from switches between all the available biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature

 

Results

Study

Number of patients

Switch type

ACR20

ACR50

ACR70

DAS44 <1.6 or DAS28 <2.6

ΔDAS P< 0.05

Evidence levela

Strengtha

Anti-TNFα blockers

[3]

25

IFX → ETA

64%

23%

5%

-

-

3b

B

[4]

95

IFX → ETA

38%

24%

15%

-

6.46 → 4.97

3b

B

[5]

28

ETA → IFX

62%

30.7%

-

15.4%

5.2 → 4

3b

B

[6]

6,610

ETA/IFX → ADA

60%

33%

13%

12%

31% (-1.9 ± 1.4)

2b

B

[7]

25

IFX → ADA

75%

50%

33%

-

5.6 → 3.2

3b

B

Anti-CD20

[8]

311

Anti-TNFα → RTX

51%

27%

12%

9%

15% (ΔDAS > 1.2)

1b

A

SR CTLA-4

[10]

391

Anti-TNFα → ABA

50.4%

20.3%

10.2%

10.0%

-

1b

A

[11]

1,046

Anti-TNFα → ABA

-

-

-

13.0%

56.1% (-2.0)

1b

A

Interleukin-6R inhibitor

[12]

499

Anti-TNFα → TOC

50.0%

28.8%

12.4%

30.1%

-

1b

A

  1. aAccording to the levels of evidence of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (Oxford, UK). ΔDAS P <0.05, significant difference in disease activity score value before and after switching; ABA, abatacept; ACR20, American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria; ACR50, American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria; ACR70, American College of Rheumatology 70% improvement criteria; ADA, adalimumab; anti-TNFα, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha; DAS28, disease activity score using 28 joint counts; DAS44, disease activity score using 44 joint counts; ETA, etanercept; IFX, infliximab; RTX, rituximab; TOC, tocilizumab (8 mg/kg group).