Skip to main content

Table 5 Post-MI treatment in RA and control patients: comparison of three time periods

From: Rheumatoid arthritis patients receive less frequent acute reperfusion and secondary prevention therapy after myocardial infarction compared with the general population

 

Prior to 1999

1999 to 2002 inclusive

2003 onward

Acute reperfusion (all patients)

   

   RA patients, n (%)

6/16 (38%)

4/38 (10%)*

4/28 (12%)

   Controls, n (%)

10/19 (53%)

17/41 (41%)

6/30 (20%)

Acute reperfusion (STEMI patients)

   

   RA patients, n (%)

6/10 (60%)

4/13 (31%)*

4/6 (67%)

   Controls, n (%)

9/12 (75%)

14/20 (70%)

6/7 (86%)

Thrombolysis

   

   RA patients, n (%)

3/16 (19%)

3/42 (7%)*

2/32 (6%)

   Controls, n (%)

8/19 (42%)

12/41 (29%)

2/30 (7%)

Percutaneous coronary intervention

   

   RA patients, n (%)

4/16 (25%)

3/42 (7%)*

3/32 (9%)*

   Controls, n (%)

3/19 (16%)

15/41 (36%)

12/30 (40%)

Aspirin

   

   RA patients, n (%)

14/16 (88%)

41/42 (98%)

30/32 (94%)

   Controls, n (%)

19/19 (100%)

41/41 (100%)

29/30 (97%)

Beta blockers

   

   RA patients, n (%)

8/16 (50%)

32/42 (76%)

24/32 (75%)

   Controls, n (%)

15/19 (79%)

32/41 (78%)

28/30 (93%)

ACE inhibitors

   

   RA patients, n (%)

8/16 (50%)

29/42 (69%)

24/32 (75%)

   Controls, n (%)

14/19 (74%)

24/41 (58%)

19/30 (63%)

Lipid-lowering agents

   

   RA patients, n (%)

0/16 (0)*

16/42 (38%)*

20/32 (62%)

   Controls, n (%)

7/19 (37%)

31/41 (76%)

25/30 (83%)

  1. ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; MI, myocardial infarction; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction. *P < 0.05 for the comparison with control patients.