Skip to main content

Table 3 Patient characteristics studied as determinants for clinical knee OA progression in the included studies

From: Prognostic factors for progression of clinical osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies

Determinant

Author [ref.] year

Instrument of measurement

Definition of knee OA progression

OR/RR/HR/β (95 % CI)

Association with OA prognosis*

Age

Muraki [25] 2012

Per 5 years increase

Incident knee pain at follow-up (baseline K/L ≥2)

OR 1.01 (0.95–1.07)

o

(N = 10,043)

Holla [20] 2010

Continuous (years)

Progressing/remaining in poor WOMAC-PF quintiles

OR 0.97 (0.94–1.00)

–

 

Holla [21] 2014

Continuous (years)

Poor vs good outcome WOMAC-PF trajectory

OR 0.94 (0.88–1.00)

–

 

Collins [15] 2014

Continuous (years)

Severe vs no pain WOMAC pain trajectory

OR 0.92 (0.89–0.96)

–

 

Riddle [29] 2009

Continuous (years)

Knee joint surgery

OR 1.07 (1.02–1.11)

+

 

Riddle [30] 2012

Continuous (years)

Knee joint surgery

RR 1.04 (1.01–1.23)

+

Female sex

Collins [15] 2014

Female vs male

Severe vs no pain WOMAC pain trajectory

OR 3.0 (1.5–6.2)

+

(N = 3,066)

Muraki [25] 2012

Female vs male

Incident knee pain at follow-up (baseline K/L ≥2)

OR 1.32 (0.94–1.84)

o

Ethnicity

Collins [15] 2014

Non-white vs white

Severe vs no pain WOMAC pain trajectory

OR 3.3 (1.7–6.6)

+

(N = 2,585)

Holla [20] 2010

Non-western vs western

Progressing/remaining in poor WOMAC-PF quintiles

OR 4.03 (1.06–15.4)

+

Education level

Collins [15] 2014

<College ≥ college

Severe vs no pain WOMAC pain trajectory

OR 5.1 (2.3–11.2)

+

(N = 2,531)

Riddle [29] 2009

≤ High school graduate

Knee joint surgery

OR 2.40 (1.09–5.28)

+

Body mass index (N = 4,857)

Holla [20] 2010

Continuous

Progressing/remaining in poor WOMAC-PF quintiles

OR 1.06 (1.02–1.11)

+

Sharma [34] 2003

Per 5 unit increase

Progressing/remaining in poor WOMAC-PF quintiles

OR 1.15 (0.89–1.46)

o

Collins [15] 2014

Obese vs non-obese

Severe vs no pain WOMAC pain trajectory

OR 2.3 (1.2–4.4)

+

Holla [21] 2014

Continuous

Moderate vs good outcome WOMAC-PF trajectory

OR 1.12 (1.07–1.18)

+

Muraki [25] 2012

Per 5 units increase

Incident knee pain at follow-up (baseline K/L ≥2)

OR 1.54 (1.90–1.82)

+

Riddle [29] 2009

≤30 vs >30 kg/m2

Knee joint surgery

OR 2.66 (1.20–5.92)

+

Bodyweight change

Riddle [31] 2013

≥–10 % vs –4.9 to +4.9 %

 

β 4.07 (1.49–6.65)

–

(N = 1,410)

 

–9.9 to –5 % vs –4.9 to +4.9 %

Increase self-reported limitations (WOMAC-PF)

β 0.01 (–1.87 to 1.89)

o

  

+5 to +9.9 % vs –4.9 to +4.9 %

Increase in pain (WOMAC); similar results, not tabulated

β 1.08 (–0.91 to 3.07)

o

  

≥ + 10 % vs –4.9 to +4.9 %

 

β –5.36 (–8.74 to –2.00)

+

Knee compression force

Henriksen [18] 2013

Change in peak knee joint compressive force

Change in KOOS-4

LSMD –2.4 (–6.8 to 1.9)

o

(N = 157)

 

Change in walking speed, m/s

LSMD –0.01 (–0.05 to 0.03)

o

Co-morbidity count

Holla [20] 2010

≥3 vs none

Progressing/remaining in poor WOMAC-PF quintiles

OR 1.53 (0.93–2.53)

o

(N = 3,672)

Holla [21] 2014

≥3 vs < 3

Poor vs good outcome WOMAC-PF trajectory

OR 3.28 (1.62–6.64)

+

 

Collins [15] 2014

≥1 vs 0

Severe vs no pain WOMAC pain trajectory

OR 2.0 (1.0–3.9)

+

 

Pisters [27] 2012

Per unit CIRS increase

Increase in self-reported limitations (WOMAC-PF)

β 3.69 (1.66–8.23)

+

 

Van Dijk [37] 2011

Per unit CIRS increase

Increase in self-reported limitations (WOMAC-PF)

β –0.147 (not provided)

+

   

Increase in performance-based limitations (TWT)

β 0.150 (not provided)

+

Mental health

Collins [15] 2014

CES-D ≥16 vs CES-D < 16

Severe vs no pain WOMAC pain trajectory

OR 8.8 (3.1–25.2)

+

(N = 6,659)

Sharma [34] 2003

Per 5 points score

Progressing/remaining in poor WOMAC-PF quintiles

OR 0.58 (0.39–0.86)

–

 

Riddle [30] 2012

Per unit SF-12 MCS score

Knee joint surgery

RR 1.07 (1.04–1.10)

+

Vitality

Holla [21] 2014

Per unit SF-36 HS score

Poor vs good outcome WOMAC-PF trajectory

OR 0.96 (0.94–0.98)

–

(N = 871)

Van Dijk [37] 2011

Per unit SF-36 MOS score

Increase in self-reported limitations (WOMAC-PF)

β 0.157 (not provided)

–

   

Increase in performance-based limitations (TWT)

β –0.229 (not provided)

–

Pain coping

Alschuler [9] 2013

CSQ subscale praying or hoping

≥20 % change in combined NRS and WOMAC-PF score

Not provided

+

(N = 1,048)

 

CSQ subscale catastrophizing

≥20 % change in combined NRS or WOMAC-PF score

Not provided

+

Holla [20] 2010

PCI subscale distraction

Progressing/remaining in poor WOMAC-PF quintiles

OR 1.26 (0.98–1.62)

o

 

PCI subscale worrying

OR 0.63 (0.66–0.73)

–

Holla [21] 2014

PCI subscale resting

Poor vs good outcome WOMAC-PF trajectory

OR 1.16 (1.02–1.31)

+

Pisters [27] 2012

PCI subscale resting

Increase in self-reported limitations (WOMAC-PF)

β 23.3 (1.93–280.7)

+

   

Increase in performance-based limitations (TWT)

β 3.13 (1.95–5.03)

+

Morning stiffness

Holla [20] 2010

<30 minutes, yes vs no

Progressing/remaining in poor WOMAC-PF quintiles

OR 1.37 (0.99–1.88)

o

(N = 832)

     

Knee injury

Muraki [25] 2012

Previous knee injury

Incident knee pain at follow-up (baseline K/L ≥2)

OR 2.91 (1.26–6.82)

+

(N = 1,313)

     

Knee surgery

Riddle [30] 2012

History of knee surgery

Knee joint surgery

RR 2.04 (1.33–3.13)

+

(N = 4,670)

     

Pain medication use

Riddle [30] 2012

For pain, aching or stiffness

Knee joint surgery

RR 1.64 (0.87–3.12)

o

(N = 6,516)

Lapane [22] 2015

NSAID usage vs not

MICD of WOMAC pain

β –0.88 (–2.22 to 0.46)

o

   

MICD of WOMAC-PF

β –4.27 (–8.84 to 0.31)

o

   

MICD of WOMAC stiffness

β –0.72 (–1.56 to 0.12)

o

Bisphosphonate use

Laslett [24] 2014

Yes vs no

Decrease in WOMAC pain

β 0.69 (–0.54 to 1.92)

o

(N = 323)

  

Decrease in WOMAC function

β 0.05 (–3.85 to 3.95)

o

   

Decrease in WOMAC stiffness

β –0.24 (–0.75 to 0.27)

o

   

Decrease in NRS after 3 and 4 years, but not 5 years

β –1.15 (–1.94 to –0.36)

+

Glucosamine/chondroitin use

Yang [38] 2015

Yes vs no

MICD of WOMAC pain

β 0.68 (–0.16 to 1.53)

o

  

MICD of WOMAC-PF

β 1.28 (–1.23 to 3.79)

o

(N = 1,625)

  

MICD of WOMAC stiffness

β 0.41 (0–0.82)

o

History of HRS

Riddle [30] 2012

Yes vs no

Knee joint surgery

RR 2.73 (0.93–8.07)

o

(N = 4,670)

     
  1. *Statistically significant association of the determinant with OA progression: + positive association, – negative association, o no association (adjusted for age and sex if applicable).
  2. β regression coefficient, CES-D Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale, CI confidence interval, CIRS Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, CSQ Coping Strategies Questionnaire, HR hazard ratio, HRS hip replacement surgery, K/L Kellgren and Lawrence score, KOOS-4 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain, symptoms, function and quality of life, LSMD least squares means difference, MICD minimally important clinical difference, N combined sample size, NRS Numeric Rating Scale, NSAID non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, OA osteoarthritis, OR odds ratio, PCI Pain Coping Inventory, RR relative risk, SF-12 MCS Short Form survey instrument for the Mental Component Summary, SF-36 HS/MOS SF-36 Health Survey/Medical Outcome Study, TWT Timed Walking Test, WOMAC-PF physical function scale of the Western Ontario and McMaster osteoarthritis index