Skip to main content

Table 2 Knee pain associations by feature and quality score

From: A systematic review of the relationship between subchondral bone features, pain and structural pathology in peripheral joint osteoarthritis

Author

Feature (method)

Knee pain outcome

Adjustment for confounders

Association (magnitude) crude

Association (magnitude) adjusted

Association

Quality score (%)

MRI bone marrow lesion - cohort studies

Foong 2014 [21]

Change in BML size (L) and incident BMLs (L) in all three knee compartments

WOMAC Knee pain severity at 2-year and 10-year visits (L)

Age, sex, BMI, leg strength, and the presence of ROA

NR

Incident or change in total BML size β = 1.53 (95 % CI 0.37 to 2.70.

+

High (67)

Medial tibial change in BML size β = 2.96 (95 % CI 0.59-5.34

Incidence of BML or increase in size associated with increase in pain in the medial tibia

Driban 2013 [72]

Knee baseline BML volume (C), BML volume change (L) (TFJ)

48-month change in WOMAC pain (L)

Age, sex, BMI

NR

β = 0.21

+

High (61)

(standard error 0.07)

Longitudinal (L) changes in BML correlated with (L) changes in pain severity

p = 0.004

Dore 2010 [124]

MRI BML size (L) regional or whole TFJ over 2.7 years

Change in WOMAC pain (L) over 2.7 years

Age, sex, BMI, leg strength, quality of life, and baseline pain, function

β (95 % CI) Total BML size change = 1.06 (0.10 to 2.03)

β (95 % CI) total BML size change = 1.13 (0.28 to 1.98)

+

High (56)

Kornaat 2007 [173]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML change over 2 years (L) TFJ

Mean WOMAC pain over 2 years

Age, sex and BMI

NR

β (95 % CI) = 2 (−8 to 11)

NA

High (56)

Moisio 2009 [125]

Baseline MRI semi-quantitative BML score (C) TFJ and PFJ

Incident frequent knee pain 2 years after baseline (L)

Age, sex, BMI, BML score, % denuded bone

NR

OR (95 % CI) medial tibia and femur 1.41 (0.86 to 2.33), lateral tibia and femur 1.70 (1.07 to 2.69)

+ Lateral TFJ BML score associated with incident frequent knee pain

High (56)

Sowers 2011 [28]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML, size in TFJ (C)

Increasing WOMAC pain (L)

Nil

Medial and lateral TFJ BMLs both p <0.005

NR

+

Low (53)

Zhang 2011 [126]

Semi-quantitative change in MRI BML size (L) TFJ over 30 months

Incidence of frequent knee pain, and categorical severity (L) over 30 months

Synovitis and effusions

OR (95 % CI) Severity of frequent knee pain OR 3.0 (1.5 to 6.0)

OR (95 % CI) Incident frequent knee pain p for trend = 0.006. Severity of frequent knee pain OR 2.2 (1.0 to 4.7) p = 0.047

+ Ipsilateral association

Low (50)

Wildi 2010 [95]

24-month change in regional TFJ BML score WORMS (L)

24-month change in WOMAC pain (L)

Nil

R <0.15, p >0.067 for all compartments

NR

NA, all compartments had no correlation

Low (50)

Tanamas 2010 [89]

Baseline semi-quantitative MRI BML size (C)

Annual change in WOMAC pain (L)

Nil

NR

NR

NA

Low (50)

MRI bone marrow lesion - cross-sectional studies

Zhai 2006 [135]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML (C)

WOMAC pain >1 (C)

Age, BMI, sex, knee strength, chondral defects

NR

OR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.04, 2.00

+

High (79)

Sharma 2014 [133]

Semi-quantitative BML score WORMS TFJ or PFJ (C)

Prevalent frequent knee symptoms (C)

Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous knee injury, and previous knee surgery

NR

BMLs in any compartment OR 1.96, 95 % CI 1.38 to 2.77

+ BML association with prevalent knee symptoms

High (71)

Kornaat 2006 [130]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML (C)

Chronic pain presence (C)

Age, sex, and BMI

NR

OR 1.13, 95 % 0.41, 3.11, p = 0.76

NA

High (71)

Lo 2009 [131]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML (BLOKS) (C)

WOMAC pain (C)

Synovitis, effusion scores

p for trend = 0.0009

p for trend = 0.006

+

High (71)

Stefanik 2014 abstract [134]

BML (WORMS) (C) (patellofemoral joint)

Prevalent knee pain (any pain in last 30 days) and pain VAS (C)

Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, depressive symptoms and TFJ BMLs

NR

Isolated BML of the lateral PFJ, OR (95 % CI) 1.4 (0.9 to 2.0); medial PFJ, OR (95 % CI) 1.1 (0.8 to 1.5). Isolated lateral PFJ BMLs OR 6.6 (1.7 to 11.5)

NC

High (71)

Ratzlaff 2013 [132]

Total BML volume in the femur or tibia (C)

Weight-bearing knee pain WOMAC subscale (C)

Age, sex, BMI, race, and medial minimum joint space width

NR

Total BML volume femur p = 0.003, tibia p = 0.101

+ Femoral NA Tibial

High (71)

Ip 2011 [99]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML (C)

WOMAC pain (C)

Age, sex, BMI, OA stage, joint effusion, and meniscal damage

NR

Total WOMAC pain

NC

High (68)

R = 0.05, 95 % CI −0.04 to 0.14. Stair climbing pain R = 0.09 (0.00 to 0.18)

Torres 2006 [103]

MRI BML (WORMS) TFJ and PFJ (C)

Pain VAS (C)

Age, BMI

Coefficient 5.00, 95 % CI 3.00 to 7.00

Coefficient 3.72, 95 % CI 1.76 to 5.68

+

High (68)

Kim 2013 [129]

Summary score and severity of MRI BML (WORMS) (C)

WOMAC pain severity or presence of knee pain (C)

Age, sex, BMI, radiographic OA

NR

BML summary score medial TFJ OR 2.33, 95 % CI 1.02 to 5.33, p <0.001

+ Severity of BML is proportional to WOMAC in medial compartment after adjustment

High (64)

Moisio 2009 [125]

Baseline MRI semi-quantitative BML score (C) TFJ and PFJ

Presence of baseline moderate to severe knee pain (C)

Percent denuded bone, age, sex, BMI

NR

Bone marrow lesion score, OR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.63 to 1.44. Not significant in all compartments

NA found on cross-sectional analysis

High (64)

Ratzlaff 2014 [48] Abstract

Median BML volume (PFJ, TFJ) (C)

Stair-climbing knee pain WOMAC (C)

Nil

TFJ p = 0.01, patellofemoral p = 0.01, femur p = 0.02, tibia p = 0.03

NR

+

High (64)

Hayes 2005 [22]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML (C)

Chronic pain presence (C)

Nil

p = 0.001

NR

+

High (61)

Ai 2010 [127]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML (C)

Pain verbal rating scale (Likert) (C)

Nil

p = 0.33

NR

NA

Low (57)

Bilgici 2010 [128]

MRI BML (WORMS) (C)

WOMAC pain, pain VAS (C)

Nil

WOMAC r = 0.508, p <0.01 Pain VAS r = 0.488, p <0.01

NR

+

Low (57)

Sowers 2003 [29]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML (C)

Chronic pain presence (C)

Nil

OR 5.0, 95 % CI 2.4 to 10.5

NR

+

Low (54)

Link 2003 [101]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML (C)

WOMAC pain (C)

Nil

p >0.05

NR

NA

Low (54)

Felson 2001 [96]

Semi-quantitative MRI BMLs (C)

Chronic knee pain presence (C)

Radiographic severity, age, sex, and effusion score

p <0.001

OR 3.31, 95 % CI 1.54 to 7.41

+

Low (54)

Fernandez-Madrid 1994 [97]

Crude presence of MRI BMLs (C)

Crude pain presence (C)

Nil

NR

NR

NA

Low (46)

MRI bone marrow lesion - case−control studies

Javaid 2010 [140]

Baseline semi-quantitative MRI BML size (WORMS) (C) TFJ and PFJ

Incident frequent knee pain after 15 months (L)

Age, sex, race, BMI

NR

Whole knee OR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.2 to 6.5

+

High (76)

Felson 2007 [181]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML size increase (WORMS) (L) TFJ and PFJ

Incident frequent pain at 15 months (L)

Age, sex, race, BMI, quadriceps strength, KL score, malalignment, baseline BML score

OR 4.1, 95 % CI 2.1 to 8.1

OR 3.2, 95 % CI 1.5 to 6.8

+

High (71)

Javaid 2012 [139]

Baseline Semi-quantitative MRI BML, (WORMS) (C) TFJ and PFJ

Presence of frequent knee pain (C) after 2 years

Nil

OR 1.70, 95 % CI 1.08 to

NR

+

Low (59)

Zhao 2010 [105]

Baseline crude presence of MRI BMLs at (C) TFJ

Change in WOMAC Pain (L)

Nil

p = 0.60

NR

NA

Low (56)

Stahl 2011 [41]

Semi-quantitative MRI BML size (WORMS) (L) TFJ

Changes in WOMAC score (L)

Nil

NR

Data not shown

NA

Low (47)

MRI osteophyte – cohort studies

Sowers 2011 [28]

Semi-quantitative MRI osteophyte, size in TFJ (C)

Increasing WOMAC pain (L)

Nil

Medial and lateral TFJ BMLs both p <0.001

NR

+

Low (53)

MRI osteophyte - cross-sectional studies

Kornaat 2006 [130]

Semi-quantitative MRI osteophyte (C)

Chronic pain presence (C)

Age, sex, BMI

NR

Patellofemoral OR 2.25, 95 % CI 1.06 to 4.77

+

High (71)

Sengupta 2006 [136]

Semi-quantitative MRI osteophyte (WORMS) (C)

Pain severity WOMAC, chronic pain (C)

Age, sex, BMI

NR

OR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.86 to 1.10

NA

High (71)

Torres 2006 [103]

MRI osteophyte, (WORMS) TFJ and PFJ (C)

Pain VAS (C)

Nil

Coefficient 1.18, 95 % CI 0.63 to 1.72

Coefficient 0.50, 95 % CI 0.07 to 0.94

NC

High (68)

Hayes 2005 [22]

Semi-quantitative MRI osteophyte (C)

Chronic pain presence (C)

Nil

p <0.001

NR

+

High (61)

Ai 2010 [127]

Semi-quantitative MRI osteophytes (C)

Pain verbal rating scale (Likert) (C)

Nil

p = 0.166

NR

NA

Low (57)

Hayashi 2012 [137]

Crude presence of MRI osteophytes (C)

Presence of pain on WOMAC pain subscale (C)

Nil

OR 4.2 to 6.4, p = 0.001-0.011

NR

+

Low (57)

Link 2003 [101]

Semi-quantitative MRI osteophytes (C)

WOMAC pain (C)

Nil

p >0.05

NR

NA

Low (54)

Fernandez-Madrid 1994 [97]

Crude presence of MRI osteophytes (C)

Crude pain presence (C)

Nil

NR

NR

NA

Low (46)

MRI osteophyte - case–control studies

Javaid 2010 [140]

Baseline semi-quantitative MRI osteophyte, size (WORMS) (C) TFJ and PFJ

Incident frequent knee pain after 15 months (L)

Age, sex, race, BMI

NR

Whole knee severe osteophyte OR 4.7, 95 % CI 1.3 to 18

+

High (76)

MRI bone attrition - cross-sectional studies

Hernandez-Molina 2008 [138]

Semi-quantitative MRI bone attrition (WORMS) (C)

Pain severity and nocturnal pain (WOMAC) (C)

Age, sex, BMI, BMLs, effusions and KL grade

OR (95 % CI) pain severity OR 1.6 (1.1 to 2.3), nocturnal pain OR 1.1 (0.5 to 2.1)

OR (95 % CI) pain severity OR 0.9 (0.6 to 1.4), nocturnal pain OR 1.0 (0.5 to 2.1).

NA

High (71)

Torres 2006 [103]

MRI attrition, (WORMS) TFJ and PFJ (C)

Pain VAS (C)

Nil

Coefficient 3.33, 95 % CI 1.79 to 4.87

Coefficient 1.91, 95 % CI 0.68 to 3.13

+

High (68)

MRI bone attrition - case−control studies

Javaid 2012 [139]

Baseline semi-quantitative MRI attrition size (WORMS) (C) TFJ and PFJ

Presence of frequent knee pain (C) after 2 years

Nil

OR 2.40, 95 % CI 1.51 to 3.83

NR

+

Low (59)

MRI bone shape/dimension - cohort studies

Everhart 2014 [114]

Baseline TFJ subchondral surface ratio of medial and lateral TFJ compartments (C)

Incident frequent knee pain at 48 months, (L)

Sex, race, age, BMI, tobacco use, activity level, knee coronal alignment, baseline symptoms, injury history, surgery history, KL grade, and JSW

NR

Medial SSR OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.30 to 0.75, p = 0.0009. Lateral SSR OR 1.27, 95 % CI 0.86 to 1.88, p = 0.19

- larger MSSR gets less incident frequent knee pain

High (61)

MRI bone shape/dimension - cross-sectional studies

Ochiai 2010 [47]

MRI irregularity of femoral condyle contour (C)

Knee pain VAS (C)

Nil

Irregularity of femoral condyle contour r = 0.472, p = 0.0021

NR

+

Low (50)

MRI bone cyst - cohort studies

Sowers 2011 [28]

Semi-quantitative MRI bone cyst size in TFJ (C)

Increasing WOMAC pain (L)

Nil

NR

NR analysis described as not significant but data not shown

NA

Low (53)

MRI bone cyst - cross-sectional studies

Kornaat 2006 [130]

Semi-quantitative MRI bone cyst(C)

Chronic pain presence (C)

Nil

NR

Patellofemoral OR 1.83, 95 % CI (0.80 to 4.16)

NA

High (71)

Torres 2006 [103]

MRI bone cyst (WORMS) TFJ and PFJ (C)

Pain VAS (C)

Age, BMI

Coefficient 2.50, 95 % CI −0.38 to 5.38

Coefficient 0.82, 95 % CI −0.50 to 2.14

NA

High (68)

Hayes 2005 [22]

Semi-quantitative MRI bone cyst (C)

Chronic pain presence (C)

Age, sex, and BMI

p <0.001

NR

+

High (61)

Hayashi 2012 [137]

Crude presence of MRI bone cysts (C)

Presence of pain on WOMAC pain subscale (C)

Nil

OR 6.7 to 17.8, p = 0.004 to 0.03

NR

+

Low (57)

Link 2003 [101]

Crude presence of MRI bone cyst (C)

WOMAC pain (C)

Nil

p >0.05

NR

NA

Low (54)

MRI bone cyst - case control studies

Javaid 2010 [140]

Baseline semi-quantitative MRI bone cyst size (WORMS) (C) TFJ and PFJ

Incident frequent knee pain after 15 months (L)

Nil

NR

NR p >0.1

NA

High (76)

Javaid 2012 [139]

Baseline semi-quantitative MRI bone cyst size (WORMS) (C) TFJ and PFJ

Presence of frequent knee pain (C) after 2 years

Nil

OR 1.61, 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.52

NR

+

Low (59)

qCT bone mineral density - cross-sectional studies

Burnett 2012 [57]

BMD of patellar lateral facet (qCT) (C)

WOMAC – knee pain at rest (C)

Nil

Total lateral patella facet p = 0.04, inferior lateral facet p = 0.005

NR

 

Low (57)

2D Knee bone shape - cross-sectional studies

Haverkamp 2011 [36]

2D Bone shape knee, 1. femur and tibial width, 2. elevation of lateral tibial plateau (C)

Pain severity VAS (C)

Models adjusted for Age, BMI

NR

Bone width p = 0.167, lateral tibia plateau elevation p = 0.002

+ Lateral tibial plateau associated with pain severity, NA bone width with pain severity

Low (46)

  1. Positive correlation reported between bone feature and outcome measure (+); negative correlation reported between bone feature and outcome measure (−). BMI body mass index, BML bone marrow lesion, C a feature or outcome described in cross-section, knee pain on most days for at least the last month (chronic pain) confidence interval (CI), KL Kellgren-Lawrence, L a feature or outcome described longitudinally, NA no association, NC no conclusion could be found for an association between bone feature and outcome measure, NR not reported, OA osteoarthritis, OAI Osteoarthritis Initiative, OR odds ratio, PFJ patellofemoral joint, ROA radiographic osteoarthritis, SSR subchondral surface ratio VAS visual analogue scale, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities arthritis index, qCT quantitative computed tomography