Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between patients with significant increase or decrease in skin thickness measured by ultrasound at different sites in relation to other assessments of skin fibrosis

From: High frequency ultrasound of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis – a follow-up study

Site of US exam

ΔThickness, direction of change (n)

mRSS, baseline (median)

p

ΔmRSS (median)

p

COMP baseline (median)

p

ΔCOMP (median)

p

HAMIS baseline (median)

p

ΔHAMIS

p

Finger

Increase, (18)

9.5

0.250

1.0

0.095

11.7

0.497

1.0

0.150

4.0

0.106

1.5

0.374

Decrease, (27)

11.0

−1.0

12.3

−1.0

7.5

−1.0

Hand

Increase, (21)

10.0

0.231

0.0

0.016

12.0

0.750

0.0

0.203

5.0

0.417

0.0

0.540

Decrease, (27)

10.0

−3.0

12.0

−1.6

7.5

−1.0

Forearm

Increase, (18)

11.0

0.991

1.5

0.051

15.0

0.467

0.0

0.089

7.0

0.484

4.0

<0.001

Decrease, (30)

10.5

−1.0

12.0

−1.0

5.0

−1.0

Leg

Increase, (18)

9.5

0.423

2.0

0.007

15.0

0.029

−0.5

0.986

5.0

0.583

3.0

0.180

Decrease, (29)

10.0

−1.0

11.7

−0.5

7.0

0.0

Chest

Increase, (19)

11

0.435

0.5

0.287

15.0

0.029

−1.0

0.940

7.0

0.796

0.0

0.444

Decrease, (41)

10

0.0

11.7

0.0

6.0

0.0

Total

Increase, (21)

11

0.802

1

0.019

12.7

0.363

0.0

0.217

5.5

0.344

5.0

0.002

Decrease, (37)

10

−2

12.0

−1.6

8.0

−1.5

  1. Increase in hand skin thickness was associated with absence of improved mRSS. Increase in forearm skin thickness was associated with worsening hand function. Increase in skin thickness on leg and chest was preceded by high levels of the fibrosis biomarker COMP
  2. US ultrasound, mRSS modified Rodnan skin score, COMP cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, HAMIS hand mobility in scleroderma test
  3. Note to reviewer: The numbers describing COMP baseline with Δthickness on leg and chest are by chance identical, this has been controlled