Outcome | Tocilizumab initiators (n = 264) | Abatacept initiators (n = 264) | Unadjusted differencea abatacept vs tocilizumab | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Continuous | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | β (95% CI) | p value |
Change in CDAI | n = 259, –9.9 ± 14.1 | n = 257, –11.3 ± 14.7 | –1.27 (–3.65, 1.11) | 0.30 |
Change in mHAQ | n = 263, –0.11 ± 0.49 | n = 264, –0.12 ± 0.42 | –0.01 (–0.09, 0.06) | 0.83 |
Binary | Response rate | Response rate | OR (95% CI) | p value |
Achievement of LDA | n = 259 | n = 257 | ||
(CDAI at time of switch was imputed for switchers) | 86 (33.2%) | 85 (33.1%) | 0.99 (0.69, 1.43) | 0.97 |