Skip to main content

Table 3 Regional differences in fulfilment of classification criteria

From: The performance of different classification criteria sets for spondyloarthritis in the worldwide ASAS-COMOSPA study

 

Number of patients included

Patients fulfilling Amor criteria, n (%)

Patients fulfilling mAmor criteria, n (%)

Patients fulfilling ESSG criteria, n (%)

Patients fulfilling mESSG criteria, n (%)

Total patients fulfilling ASAS SpA criteria, n (%)

Patients fulfilling ASAS axSpAcriteria, n (%)

Patients fulfilling, ASAS pSpA criteria, n (%)

Patients fulfilling CASPAR criteria, n (%)

Western Europe

1507

1242 (82.4%)

1333 (88.5%)

1335 (88.6%)

1433 (95.1%)

1305 (86.6%)

1149 (76.2%)

156 (10.4%)

388 (25.7%)

Central Europe

438

342 (78.1%)

364 (83.1%)

402 (91.8%)

419 (95.7%)

391 (89.3%)

368 (84.0%)

23 (5.3%)

32 (7.3%)

North America

239

203 (84.9%)

205 (85.8%)

219 (91.6%)

219 (91.6%)

176 (73.6%)

122 (51.0%)

54 (22.6%)

120 (50.2%)

Latin America

348

290 (83.3%)

307 (88.2%)

314 (90.2%)

326 (93.7%)

280 (80.5%)

239 (68.7%)

41 (11.8%)

93 (26.7%)

North Africa

337

300 (89.0%)

310 (92.0%)

316 (93.8%)

324 (96.1%)

308 (91.4%)

260 (77.2%)

48 (14.2%)

94 (27.9%)

Asia

1073

905 (84.3%)

935 (87.1%)

899 (83.8%)

931 (86.8%)

910 (84.8%)

817 (76.1%)

93 (8.7%)

125 (11.6%)

  1. Abbreviations: ASAS Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society, axSpA Axial spondyloarthritis, CASPAR ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis, ESSG European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group, mAmor Modified Amor, mESSG Modified European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group, pSpA Peripheral spondyloarthritis, SpA Spondyloarthritis
  2. Percentages relate to number of patients of that specific region