Skip to main content

Table 2 Number, prevalence (95% CI) of participants defined as gout cases

From: Performance of gout definitions for genetic epidemiological studies: analysis of UK Biobank

Definition

No. of subjects, prevalence (95% CI) in entire study population (nā€‰=ā€‰105,421)

No. of subjects, prevalence (95% CI) in male participants (nā€‰=ā€‰51,844)

No. of subjects, prevalence (95% CI) in female participants (nā€‰=ā€‰53,577)

Percentage (95% CI) of study population with gout using any definition (nā€‰=ā€‰2432)

Self-report of gout diagnosis

2066, 1.96% (1.88ā€“2.05)

1921, 3.70% (3.55ā€“3.87)

145, 0.27% (0.23ā€“0.32)

84.95% (83.49ā€“86.33)

ULT use

1652, 1.57% (1.49ā€“1.64)

1529, 2.95% (2.81ā€“3.10)

123, 0.23% (0.19ā€“0.27)

67.93% (66.05ā€“69.75)

Hospital diagnosis

382, 0.36% (0.33ā€“0.40)

346, 3.29% (3.14ā€“3.45)

36, 0.07% (0.05ā€“0.09)

15.71% (14.32ā€“17.21)

Winnard definition [5]a

1861, 1.76% (1.69ā€“1.85)

1707, 3.29% (3.14ā€“3.45)

154, 0.29% (0.25ā€“0.34)

76.52% (74.80ā€“78.16)

Self-report of gout or ULT use

2295, 2.18% (2.09ā€“2.27)

2122, 4.09% (3.93ā€“4.27)

173, 0.32% (0.28ā€“0.37)

94.37% (93.38ā€“95.22)

  1. ULT Urate-lowering therapy
  2. aHospital diagnosis of gout or gout-specific medications