Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and clinical data on patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus from Cohorts Ls and Lu

From: Urine S100 proteins as potential biomarkers of lupus nephritis activity

 

Cohort Ls (n = 47)

Cohort Lu (n = 39)

Characteristic

Active SLE serum

Active LN urine

Age at diagnosis, years

15 (10.5–17.5)

14 (12–16)

Disease duration, years

5 (3–9)

3 (1–4.5)

Female sex, n (%)

41 (87.2)

31 (79.5)

White race, n (%)

27 (57.4)

18 (46.2)

Hispanic ethnicity, n (%)

18 (38.3)

6 (15.4)

Total SLEDAI-2K score

13 (10–17)

17 (12–20)

Active renal involvement, n (%)

24 (51.1)

39 (100)

 Biopsy-proven, n (%)

14a (93.3)

37 (94.9)

 SLEDAI-R score

8 (4–12)

12 (8–12)

 ISN/RPS class of LN, III/IV/V, n (%)

3/9/6a (21.4/64.3/42.9)

5/16/12 (13.5/43.2/32.4)

 eGFR < 75 ml/minute/1.73 m2, n (%)

1a (3.3)

2 (5.1)

Active extrarenal involvement, n (%)

46 (97.9)

38 (97.4)

Medications, n (%)

 Oral or intravenous steroids

40 (85.1)

35 (89.7)

 Hydroxychloroquine

41 (87.2)

32 (82)

 Other immunosuppressant

26 (55.3)

27 (69.2)

Laboratory tests

 Positive anti-dsDNA, n (%)

18a (60)

31 (79.5)

 C3, mg/dl

83.6a (59.5–114.8)

65 (45.4–93.3)

 C4, mg/dl

10.6a (7–16.2)

8.6 (4.5–11.1)

 Random urine protein/creatinine

0.26a (0.12–1.8)

2.1 (1.1–5.3)

 Active urinary sediment, n (%)

14a (46.7)

32 (82.1)

  1. Abbreviations: Cohort L s Longitudinal serum cohort, Cohort L u Longitudinal urine cohort, eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate, ISN/RPS International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society, LN Lupus nephritis, SLEDAI-2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000, SLEDAI-R Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 renal domain score, SLE Systemic lupus erythematosus
  2. All table values are expressed as median (IQR) for continuous variables and number (percent) for categorical variables
  3. aNote that certain data only available for SLE patients with serum from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (n = 30), not Brazilian patients (n = 17). Percentages in table were calculated from patients with available values for these characteristics