Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias assessment summary (QUIPS)

From: Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review

Study

Study participation

Study attrition

Prognostic factor measurement

Outcome measurement

Study confounding

Statistical analysis and reporting

Agricola et al. [11]

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Agricola et al. [12]

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Auquier et al. [13]

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Moderate

High

Moderate

Bastick et al. [15]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Bastick et al. [16]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Bergink et al. [17]

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Bouyer et al. [20]

Low

High

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Birrell et al. [19]

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Castano Betancourt et al. [21]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Chaganti et al. [22]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Chevalier et al. [23]

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Conrozier et al. [25]

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Conrozier et al. [26]

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Danielsson [27, 28]

Low

High

High

High

High

High

van Dijk et al. [29]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

van Dijk et al. [30]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Dorleijn 2015 [31]

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Dougados et al. [32]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Dougados et al. [33]

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

High

Moderate

Dougados et al. [34]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Fukushima et al. [35]

Moderate

Low

Low

High

High

Low

Golightly et al. [36]

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Gossec et al. [37]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Hartofilakidis et al. [38]

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

High

High

Hawker et al. [39]

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Hoeven et a. [40]

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Holla et al. [41]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Juhakoski et al. [42]

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Kalyoncu et al. [43]

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Kelman et al. [44]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Kerkhof et al. [45]

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Kopec et al. [46]

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Lane et al. [47]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Lane et al. [48]

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Laslett et al. [49]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Ledingham et al. [50]

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

High

High

High

Lievense et al. [51]

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Maillefert et al. [52]

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Mazieres et al. [53]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Nelson et al. [54]

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Peters et al. [56]

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Pisters et al. [57]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Pollard et al. [58]

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Reijman et al. [59]

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Reijman et al. [60]

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Reijman et al. [61]

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Solignac [62]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

van Spil et al. [63]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Tron et al. [65]

High

High

High

Moderate

High

Moderate

Verkleij et al. [66]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Vinciguerra et al. [67]

Low

Moderate

High

Low

High

High

  1. Studies with a low risk of bias in all domains are presented in italics