Skip to main content

Table 2 Multiple comparisons between the study groups

From: Diagnostic performance of serum cystatin C and complement component 1q in lupus nephritis

Items

Comparison pairs

 

HC to SLE

HC to LNA

HC to LNI

SLE to LNA

SLE to LNI

LNA to LNI

Urea

z

3.117

− 7.605

− 2.612

− 11.12

− 5.293

4.051

P

0.011

0.000

0.054

0.000

0.000

0.000

Creat

z

13.378

1.610

6.66

− 9.887

− 3.299

4.799

P

0.000

0.645

0.000

0.000

0.006

0.000

Urea/Creat

LSD-t

− 6.412

− 8.119

− 7.346

− 3.381

− 2.932

0.104

P

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.001

0.003

0.917

CysC

z

− 13.005

− 22.801

− 13.561

− 13.857

− 4.493

6.838

P

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

e-GFRCysC

LSD-t

14.340

28.624

15.292

19.128

5.322

− 10.189

P

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

eGFRCreat

LSD-t

− 8.933

3.053

− 3.629

11.163

3.093

− 5.959

P

0.000

0.002

0.000

0.000

0.002

0.000

C1q

LSD-t

6.024

11.789

4.283

7.775

− 0.091

− 6.063

P

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.928

0.000

  1. ANOVA analysis or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparing the differences among the multiple groups. z/LSD-t and P were the statistical results for the comparison between the two groups. LSD-t was the statistics of ANOVA analysis to find the difference between the observed indicators of the normal distribution, and z was the statistics of Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test to find the difference between the two observed indicators of the non-normal distribution
  2. Urea urea, Creat creatinine, CysC, cystatin C, C1q complement component 1q