Skip to main content

Table 3 Frequency of answers by the SAC. Consensus by the majority of the Safety Adjudication Committee (SAC) members (3/5) was required on the first 3 questions, so that 689 events were adjudicated by the panel. Among them, 682 were confirmed as infections and retained for the analysis

From: Opportunistic infections in immunosuppressed patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: analysis by the Pharmachild Safety Adjudication Committee

Question for adjudication by the SAC

Yes

No

Impossible to determine

Total with consensus

1. Based on the information provided, do you confirm that this patient had an infection?

682 (99%)

0

7 (1%)

689 (100%)

2. Is this infection common?

603 (88.4%)

78 (11.4%)

1 (0.2%)

682 (100%)

3. Is this an opportunistic infection?

119 (17.4%)

556 (81.5%)

7 (1%)

682 (100%)

4. Was the treatment appropriate for the infection?

484 (77.1%)

4 (0.6%)

140 (22.3%)

628 (92%)

5. Could the event be possibly related to any of the drug(s) taken at the time of the event?

307 (76.2%)

70 (17.4%)

2 (0.5%)

403* (59%)

  1. *n = 24 were events without answers for the lack of consensus by the panel (less than 3/5 experts agreeing on the answer)