Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview included studies including PREFS assessment

From: Systematic review of quantitative preference studies of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis among patients and at-risk populations

Source

Method

Participants

Country

PREFS

Studies of rheumatoid arthritis treatments

 1) Alten et al. [21]

Best-Worst scaling

1588 RA patients

Germany

3

 2) Augustovski et al. [22]

DCE

240 RA patients

Argentina

3

 3) Bywall et al. [23, 24]

DCE

358 patients with RA

Sweden

4

 4) Constantinescu et al. [25, 26]

Conjoint analysis

136 RA patients

USA

4

 5) Díaz-Torné et al. [27]

DCE

137 RA patients

Spain

3

 6) Fraenkel et al. [28]

Conjoint analysis

120 RA patients

USA

3

 7) Fraenkel et al. [29]

Conjoint analysis

156 RA patients

USA

3

 8) Fraenkel et al. [30]

Conjoint analysis

1273 RA patients

USA & Puerto Rico

4

 9) Hazlewood et al. [31, 32]

DCE

152 Early RA patients

Canada

5

 10) Ho et al. [33]

DCE

RA patients

Australia

4

 11) Husni et al. [34]

DCE

510 RA Patients

USA

4

 12) Louder et al. [35]

Conjoint analysis

380 RA patients

USA

5

 13) Nolla et al. [36]

Conjoint analysis

165 RA patients

Spain

3

 14) Ozdemir et al. [37]

DCE

463 RA patients (233 Cheap-talk and 230 Control)

USA

3

 15) Poulos et al. [38]

Conjoint Analysis

836 RA patients

USA

5

 16) Scalone et al. [39]

DCE

174 RA patients

Italy

3

 17) Skjoldborg et al. [40]

DCE

178 RA patients (145 survey 2; 130 survey 3)

Denmark

4

 18) van Heuckelum et al. [41]

DCE

325 RA patients

The Netherlands

4

 19) Bansback et al. [42]

DCE

2663 General population asked to imagine they have RA

Canada

4

 20) Harrison et al. [43]

DCE

733 General population asked to imagine they have RA

Canada

4

Studies of RA prevention

 21) Finckh et al. [44]

Best worst scaling

32 FDRs

Switzerland

4

 22) Harrison et al. [45]

DCE

288 FDRs

USA

4

 23) Harrison et al. [46]

DCE

30 FDRs

78 RA patients

Canada

4