Skip to main content

Table 1 Biologic-naïve RA patient demographics and clinical variables at baseline

From: Plasma interleukin-23 and circulating IL-17A+IFNγ+ ex-Th17 cells predict opposing outcomes of anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Baseline measures

EULAR response outcome

P valuea

Good

Poor

Number

42

51

 

Female, n (%)

29 (69)

34 (67)

0.81

Age, mean years ± SD

56.5 ± 12.8

58 ± 13.7

0.58

DAS28, mean ± SD

5.08 ± 1.08

5.07 ± 1.36

0.97

DAS28 >3.2, n (%)

40 (95)

46 (90)

0.36

CRP, mg/L median (IQR)

11.5 (3–21)

11 (3–28)

0.86

RF+, n (%)

36 (86)

39 (77)

0.26

ACPA+b, n (%)

32 (80)

41 (80)

0.96

Nodules presentc, n (%)

16 (39)

18 (35)

0.71

Erosions present, n (%)

39 (93)

46 (90)

0.65

Years since diagnosis, median (IQR)

7.6 (3.2–18.0)

6.3 (2.6–13.4)

0.37

TNF inhibitor commencedd

 Adalimumab, n (%)

31 (74)

42 (82)

0.32

 Etanercept, n (%)

11 (26)

9 (18)

0.32

Concomitant DMARDS

 Prednisone, n (%)

30 (71)

41 (80)

0.31

 Prednisone dosee, mg, median (IQR)

10 (6.0–15.0)

10 (6.0–15.0)

0.89

 Methotrexate, n (%)

25 (60)

24 (47)

0.23

 Leflunomide, n (%)

11 (26)

11 (21)

0.89

 Salazopyrin, n (%)

2 (5)

5 (10)

0.36

 Hydroxychloroquine (%)

9 (21)

6 (12)

0.21

  1. aPearson’s chi-square test was used to compare frequency. Student’s T test was used to compare mean. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparing median
  2. bTwo participants had no record of ACPA measurement due to the test not being available at the time of diagnosis
  3. cOne participant did not have the presence/absence of nodules confirmed
  4. dLow numbers within a divided cohort precluded any reliable comparison between adalimumab and etanercept treated participants
  5. eMedian dose in prednisone-only participants. Information on prednisone dose was not available for one participant