Tumor metastasis to bone

Establishment of skeletal metastasis involves bidirectional interactions between the tumor cell and the cellular elements in the bone microenvironment. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of bone metastasis will be critical in developing the means to prevent bone metastasis or inhibit its progression. The receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK)/RANK ligand pathway has emerged as the key pathway regulating osteolysis in skeletal metastasis. A number of candidate factors, including the Wnt (wingless int) proteins, endothelin-1, and bone morphogenetic proteins, have been implicated in the establishment of osteoblastic metastasis. The complex nature of tumor-bone microenvironment interactions and the presence of multiple pathways that lead to bone metastasis suggests that simultaneous targeting of these pathways in the metastatic cascade are required for effective treatment. This review discusses current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms that underlie the establishment of bone metastasis and potential molecular therapeutic strategies for prevention and treatment of bone metastasis.


Introduction
Metastases from carcinomas are the most common malignant tumors involving bone. It is estimated that there will be 1,444,920 new cases of cancer and 559,650 cancer deaths in USA in 2007 [1]. Prostate, breast, and lung cancers are the most common malignancies in adults and are the most common tumors that metastasize to bone [1,2]. Moreover, bone metastasis affects more than 60% of advanced stage breast and prostate cancer patients [2]. Carcinomas of lung, kidney and thyroid, and melanomas are other common tumors that metastasize to bone [2].
Bone metastasis is associated with increased morbidity and portends a poor outcome, with decreased survival, in cancer patients [3,4]. Bone metastases are classified as osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed, based on their radiographic appearance [4]. Bone metastases from prostate cancer are predominantly osteoblastic, whereas metastatic lesions in bone from breast cancer can be osteoblastic, osteolytic, or mixed. Irrespective of the mechanisms that are involved in the generation of these radiographic phenotypes, the end result is a change in bone architecture, which predisposes the patient to a variety of skeletal complications [3,5].

Molecular mechanism of bone metastasis
Sir Stephen Paget enunciated the 'soil and seed hypothesis' more than a century ago, stating that certain tumor cells (seeds) will selectively colonize distant organs (soil) because of the presence of a favorable environment for their localization and growth [6]. Metastasis to bone is a complex multistep event, which involves a bidirectional interaction of the tumor cells with cellular elements in three different microenvironments [7]: the site of primary neoplasm, the circulation, and the bone microenvironment. The metastatic tumor cells must escape from the primary tumor into the circulation and reach the skeletal sites, where they establish themselves, proliferate, and then induce metastatic lesions [7]. The preferential skeletal localization of tumor cells is attributed to the biologic and molecular characteristics of tumor cells as well as the bone microenvironment [4,[7][8][9][10]. The pathophysiology of bone metastasis is poorly understood. According to the traditional model of metastasis, the potential to metastasize resides in a small subset of tumor cells that have acquired this property through a set of mutations that occur during the later stages of tumor progression [11]. An emerging concept has recently challenged this existing model of metastasis by demonstrating that the potential to metastasize is encoded in the bulk of the tumor and is present early in tumor pathogenesis [11][12][13][14].
Arthritis Research & Therapy Vol 9 Suppl 1 Virk and Lieberman pre-exist in the primary tumor. Furthermore, these distinctive bone metastasis gene signatures are different from the poor prognosis gene expression signatures [13,14]. Kang and coworkers hypothesized that the poor prognosis gene signature facilitates the emergence of metastatic cells in the primary tumor, but the specific set of genes associated with bone metastasis is responsible for the cellular activities necessary to form bone metastasis [13][14][15]. Over-expression of the bone metastasis specific gene set (namely the genes encoding C-X-C chemokine receptor [CXCR]4, IL-11, connective tissue growth factor, and matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-1), along with the osteopontin gene, in various combinations considerably enhanced the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells to bone in this model. In addition, each of these genes, when expressed individually, failed to confer high skeletal tropism [15]. The bone metastasis specific genes encode mostly cell surface and secretory proteins, which participate in multiple steps involved in homing, invasion, angiogenesis, and proliferation of tumor cells in the bone microenvironment [15].
Smid and coworkers [16] analyzed 107 primary human breast tumors in order to identify genes associated with breast cancer metastasis to bone. These investigators also identified distinct poor prognosis and bone metastasis signatures in primary breast tumors. Again, ability to metastasize is distinct from the potential to home to bone and form a bone metastasis.
The data reported by Kang [15] and Smid [16] and their coworkers demonstrate that ability to form a bone metastasis is associated with a bone metastatic phenotype. The goal is therefore to develop specific therapies that can inhibit these genes in primary tumors and prevent or reduce metastasis to bone.

Bone as a unique environment for metastasis
Bone metastases are usually multifocal and have a predilection for the hematopoietic marrow sites in the proximal long bones and axial skeleton (vertebrae, pelvis, ribs, and cranium) [9]. Continuous and dynamic turnover of the bone matrix and bone marrow provides a fertile ground for tumor cells to utilize the vast available resources (cells, growth factors, cytokines, and receptors) for their homing and subsequent proliferation [17]. Both anatomic and molecular characteristics of bone make it a favorable site for metastasis [9]. Abundant sinusoids and sluggish blood flow in the metaphysis facilitate an intimate interaction between endothelium and tumor cells, which is necessary for their initial colonization in the bone marrow [9,18]. Moreover, it appears that a subset of bone marrow cells (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 expressing hematopoietic progenitor cells and fibroblasts) may form a 'premetastatic niche' in response to the humoral factors secreted by the primary neoplasm. The cells comprising the premetastatic niche express cell surface ligands and receptors (integrin and fibronectin), which provide a permissive environment for the migrating tumor cells [19]. In addition, various growth factors and cytokines in the bone marrow such as endothelin (ET)-1, basic fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, IL-6, and IL-8 serve as paracrine regulators of the initial growth of metastatic tumor cells [20]. The interaction of receptor molecules in the bone marrow stroma (urokinase receptor, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and fibronectin) with the ligands that are over-expressed on the tumor cells (β 1 , α 4 β 1 and α 5 β 1 integrins, cadherin-11, connective tissue growth factor, and CXCR4) promotes colonization of circulating malignant cells in the bone marrow [9,21]. The extracellular matrix proteins (especially type I collagen, type IV collagen, vitronectin, fibronectin, osteopontin, osteocalcin, bone sialoprotein, osteonectin, and stromal cell derived factor-1) are chemotactic for tumor cells and promote colonization of circulating tumor cells in the bone marrow [9,22,23].
The bone matrix is a vast storehouse of latent growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor, TGF-β, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), platelet-derived growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor. The release of these factors during bone remodeling may promote cell homing and appears to promote colonization and initial proliferation of tumor cells [24,25]. Release of these factors during the formation of both osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions stimulates a vicious cycle of tumor growth that leads to tumor cell proliferation and progression of bone lesions [26,27].

Mechanism of osteolytic and osteoblastic metastasis
Bone metastases are classified as osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed osteolytic and osteoblastic, based on their radiographic appearance [4]. These phenotypes are a reflection of the interactions between tumor cells and cellular elements (osteoclasts and osteoblasts) of the bone microenvironment. Previous studies conducted in our laboratory and others have demonstrated that human cancer cells that metastasize to bone are characterized by a distinct cytokine profile, which dictates the final phenotype of the skeletal lesion [28,29]. We demonstrated that human prostate cancer cells that produce osteolytic lesions over-expressed factors such as IL-1, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which are involved in the stimulation of osteoclast differentiation and activation [28]. In addition, we also showed that human prostate cancer cell lines forming osteoblastic lesions produced factors such as BMP, osteoprotegerin (OPG), and TGF-β, which are associated with bone formation [28].

Osteolytic metastasis
The most common manifestation of bone metastasis is osteolysis [26,27]. Numerous in vivo studies in animals suggest the existence of a vicious cycle in the pathogenesis and progression of an osteolytic metastasis [4,26,27]. This complex vicious cycle includes reciprocal interactions between tumor cells, bone cells (osteoclasts and osteoblasts), and the bone matrix ( Figure 1). The tumor cells secrete various soluble factors that promote osteoclast differentiation, proliferation, and activation, which leads to increased osteolysis (Table 1). Growth factors (TGF-β, insulin-like growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and BMP) mobilized from bone following osteolysis support the growth and survival of the tumor cells [4,24,26,27]. In return, the growing tumor secretes more pro-osteolytic factors, which results in further osteolysis and perpetuation of the vicious cycle. A better understanding of the complex tumor cell-host cell interactions in the bone microenvironment, and of the autocrine and the paracrine effects of the secreted factors (tumor cells) and released factors (from bone matrix) will facilitate development of effective strategies to inhibit disease progression [26].
The osteoclasts, which are derivatives of the pluripotent hematopoietic precursors in the marrow, are the primary cells involved in tumor-mediated osteolysis [30]. Osteoclast differentiation and maturation is the critical cellular process involved in the pathophysiology of osteolytic metastasis [31,32]. The OPG/receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK)/RANKL pathway has emerged as the key pathway regulating osteoclast formation and survival in physiologic and pathologic states, including skeletal metastases [33,34].
RANKL is a member of the TNF ligand superfamily and is expressed on numerous cell types, including osteoblast/ stromal cells [35]. RANKL exists either as a membrane bound or a soluble isoform, and it is the principal ligand for RANK [36]. RANK is a TNF receptor that is expressed on osteoclasts and dendritic cells [37]. RANK-RANKL interaction in the presence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor activates multiple intracellular signaling cascades (nuclear factor-κB, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, cellular Src kinases, and Jun amino-terminal kinases) in the precursor osteoclasts [31,32,38]. Stimulation of these pathways eventually results in increased formation, maturation, and survival of osteoclasts [31,32]. OPG -the third member of the triad -is a secreted TNF receptor that acts as a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) [39,40]. OPG is a negative regulator of the RANK/RANKL pathway and prevents RANK-RANKL interaction by sequestering RANKL. Hence, OPG decreases osteoclastogenesis and promotes osteoclast apoptosis [35,39,40].

Figure 1
Vicious cycle in osteolytic bone metastasis. The pro-osteolytic factors secreted by the tumor cells (PTHrP, IL-1, IL-8, IL-11, soluble RANKL, TNF-α, and PGE) promote osteolysis by stimulating osteoclast formation and maturation. The growth factors secreted following osteolysis (BMP, IGF, and TGF-β) are stimulatory for tumor growth, which results in increased tumor burden and eventually more osteolysis. The inset delineates the regulation of osteoclast formation and activation. RANKL on the osteoblast/stromal cells interacts with the RANK on the osteoclast precursors in the presence of M-CSF to stimulate their differentiation into mature osteoclasts. An alternate pathway (RANKL independent) of osteoclast differentiation (mediated by IL-1 and its receptor IL-1R on the osteoclast) is also shown. BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; OB, osteoblast; OCL, osteoclast; PG, prostaglandin; PTHrP, parathyroid hormone related peptide; IL, interleukin; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; TGF, transforming growth factor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Recently, we noted that simultaneous blocking of the osteolytic and osteoblastic pathways in a metastatic mixed lung cancer lesion of bone is superior to inhibition of either pathway alone [45]. Because many metastatic lesions in bone are considered mixed (although the lytic or the blastic phase may be predominant), therapeutic strategies that target both the osteolytic and osteoblastic components may be necessary to inhibit progression of a skeletal metastatic lesion effectively.
These studies clearly highlight the pivotal role of the OPG/RANKL axis in the pathogenesis of tumor-mediated osteolysis in a pure lytic as well as a mixed metastatic skeletal lesion. The ratio of RANKL to OPG has also been postulated as one of the factors that determines the final phenotype (osteolytic versus osteoblastic) of the skeletal metastasis [33,46,47]. Osteolysis is characterized by an increase in the ratio of RANKL to OPG; tumor-secreted factors that have been implicated in osteolysis increase this ratio by upregulating the RANKL expression on osteoblasts/stromal cells or by downregulating OPG secretion [26,34,41].

Osteoblastic metastasis
Osteoblasts are the key cells involved in forming the woven bone seen in osteoblastic metastasis [4,5,27]. Tumor cells forming osteoblastic metastases secrete numerous proosteoblastic factors (cytokines, transcription factors, and Table 1 Pro-osteolytic tumor-secreted factors and their described role in the pathogenesis of osteolytic metastasis MMPs Assist osteoclast mediated bone resorption [86] CXCR, C-X-C chemokine receptor; IL, interleukin; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; OPG, osteoprotegerin; PTHrP, parathyroid hormone-related peptide; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; TGF, transforming growth factor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. growth factors) that switch normal bone remodeling toward a predominant bone-forming state ( Table 2). These factors stimulate various steps that are involved in the differentiation, proliferation, and maturation of osteoblasts or inhibition of osteoclast pathways [4,27] (Table 2). Activated osteoblasts secrete numerous growth factors during the formation of woven bone (TGF-β, BMP, and vascular cell endothelial growth factor), which are used by tumor cells to potentiate their survival and growth. The growing tumor secretes more pro-osteoblastic factors, thereby amplifying the formation of woven bone and perpetuating the vicious cycle [4,50].
In 1958, Roland [51] introduced the theory that every primary or metastatic cancer in bone (including osteoblastic prostate cancers) begins with osteolysis. Whether initial osteolysis is required for development of osteoblastic metastasis is unclear [28,43,44,52]. Bisphosphonates and other agents that inhibit osteoclastic activity have failed to prevent formation of osteoblastic lesions in murine models of metastasis, which is indirect evidence that osteoblastic lesions can form in the absence of initial osteoclastic activity [28,43,53]. In a mouse tibial injection model using human prostate cancer cells that produce osteoblastic metastasis, Lee and coworkers [54] demonstrated that zoledronate failed to halt the formation of osteoblastic lesions, indicating that osteoclasts may not be essential in the establishment of osteoblastic metastasis.
Using a similar animal model, Whang and coworkers [44] administered RANK-Fc to block osteolysis in an attempt to prevent the establishment of osteoblastic lesions by human prostate cancer cells. RANK-Fc treatment failed to prevent or delay the establishment of osteoblastic lesions, but overall tumor growth was limited. These findings suggest that blocking osteolytic activity is important even when treating osteoblastic lesions because it slows the release of growth factors from bone matrix that may enhance tumor proliferation.
The Wnt (wingless int) pathway, the ET axis, and the BMP pathway have emerged as key regulators of the establishment of osteoblastic skeletal metastasis [25,52,55]. Wnt proteins are soluble glycoproteins that promote embryonic and postnatal bone formation [56]. These proteins bind to a membrane receptor complex comprised of frizzled (FZD) G-protein-coupled receptor and a low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein [56]. The formation of this ligandreceptor complex initiates a number of intracellular signaling cascades that modulate differentiation, survival, and activity of the osteoblasts. Prostate cancer cells forming osteoblastic and mixed osteoblastic and osteolytic metastases express a variety of Wnt proteins [52,57]. Hall and coworkers [52] recently explored the roles played by the autocrine and paracrine effects of Wnt proteins in the establishment of osteoblastic metastatic prostate cancer. Limiting the activity of Wnt proteins by their natural antagonist Dickkopf-1 decreased the osteoblastic component of mixed osteolytic and osteoblastic bone lesions produced by human prostate cancer cells in an intratibial injection model [52]. Table 2 Pro-osteoblastic tumor-secreted factors and their described role in the establishment of osteoblastic metastasis
Nelson and coworkers [55] first hypothesized that there is an association between ET-1 and osteoblastic metastasis in patients with advanced prostate cancer. ET-1 promotes osteogenic differentiation, stimulates bone matrix formation, and inhibits osteoclast formation and motility [58]. The paracrine effects of ET-1 in the bone microenvironment are predominantly mediated by ET receptor subtype A (ET A ) receptors [55,[58][59][60]. Yin and coworkers [58] demonstrated that both human prostate and breast cancer cell lines that form osteoblastic lesions in the bone produce ET-1. Blocking the ET axis by exogenous administration of an ET A receptor antagonist decreased the number of osteoblastic lesions formed in nude mice following intracardiac injection of human breast cancer cells.
Considering the integral role played by BMP in skeletal development and postnatal bone repair, BMP was hypothesized to be involved in the new bone formation observed in bone metastasis [61,62]. The BMPs, especially BMP-2, BMP-6 and BMP-7, are known to play a critical role in formation of osteoblastic bone metastasis by virtue of their osteo-inductive and cell type specific proliferative activity [25,45,[61][62][63][64][65]. Studies conducted in our laboratory and others have shown that human prostate, lung, or breast cancer cells forming osteoblastic bone metastasis secrete a variety of BMPs and express BMP receptors [25,45,[64][65][66].
In addition, BMPs stimulate invasion, migration, and proliferation of human prostate and lung cancer cells, which suggests participation of BMPs in an autocrine loop to regulate tumor growth [25,45]. Finally, blocking the effect of BMPs with noggin (an endogenous antagonist of BMP) leads to a decrease in the formation of osteoblastic lesions in a mouse intratibial injection model [45].
Although the animal models that are currently available provide useful data, they do not truly simulate metastatic disease. Transgenic mouse models and syngeneic models of breast and prostate cancer exhibit a low incidence of metastasis to bone and lack reproducibility [67]. The injection of tumor cells into a metastatic site (long bones) does not allow one to evaluate the factors associated with tumor cell migration, invasion, and preferential localization to a particular metastatic site. Intracardiac injection of tumor cells does not truly simulate metastasis from prostate, breast, or lung tumors because it bypasses the early steps in the metastatic process. In addition, it may take months for lesions to form, limiting the feasibility of these experiments. It is essential to recognize these limitations when using these animal data to develop a therapeutic strategy in humans [67].

Therapeutic implications and molecular treatment strategies
The ultimate goal of treating metastatic bone disease is either to prevent a bone lesion from developing or to limit the progression of an established bone metastasis. At present our understanding of the development of bone metastasis is limited. Therefore, the currently available therapies (bisphosphonates, radiotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals, and surgery) for bone metastasis focus on symptomatic management and limiting the progression of established metastatic disease [2,4]. Considering the complex nature of the tumor-bone microenvironment interactions and the existence of multiple pathways that are involved in the development of bone metastasis, it is plausible that simultaneous targeting of multiple steps in metastasis formation will be superior to inhibiting one specific target [45,68].
Identification of pathways and molecular checkpoints in the pathogenesis of skeletal metastasis has led to discovery of novel molecular targets for therapeutic intervention (Table 3). Following their success in preclinical animal studies, most of these agents are being tested in clinical trials to assess their safety profile and efficacy in debulking established bone metastases (Table 3). It may be more appropriate to develop combination therapeutic strategies to prevent metastasis rather than attempting to limit progression of established disease. Patients with established metastatic disease may benefit from a combination of agents that not only affect bone turnover but also inhibit or kill tumor cells. For example, direct injection of agents into bony metastatic sites to kill tumor cells and limit bone destruction may confer relief from pain and improve quality of life, as well as limiting the progression of metastatic disease. The availability of computed tomography guided injection techniques would permit precise targeting of anatomic regions that are difficult to reach without extensive surgical procedures, such as pelvis, spine, and proximal femur.
The OPG/RANK/RANKL pathway offers multiple molecular checkpoints for therapeutic targeting in osteolytic metastases [34]. Abrogation of this axis has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in restricting tumor-mediated osteolysis in vitro as well as in animal models of metastasis [31,34,[43][44][45].
Recombinant OPG construct was one of the first RANKL inhibitors to be used in clinical trials for osteolytic metastatic disease [69]. In a randomized, double-blind, phase I clinical trial, a single subcutaneous dose of recombinant OPG construct was well tolerated and effective in suppressing bone resorption in multiple myeloma and breast cancer patients with established skeletal metastasis [69]. However, the ability of OPG to block the TRAIL apoptosis pathway in cancer cells was noted, and there were concerns that this could lead to a flare of tumor growth [70]. Anti-RANKL antibodies (for instance, denosumab) represent a new class of RANKL inhibitors that are characterized by high affinity and specificity for RANKL [71,72]. In addition, they do not inhibit the TRAIL apoptosis pathway [71]. In a recent randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled multicenter phase I clinical study, Body and coworkers [72] demonstrated the effectiveness of denosumab. A single subcutaneous dose of denosumab (AMG 162) given to patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastasis from breast cancer yielded a dose dependent and sustained reduction in bone resorption.
Atrasentan (an ET A receptor antagonist) exhibited efficacy in treatment of osteoblastic lesions in preclinical animal models of prostate cancer bone metastasis and in phase I and II clinical trials [55,59]. However, the results of recent phase III clinical trials of atrasentan in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer were inconclusive [73,74]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial, an intent-to-treat analysis failed to demonstrate a significant delay in time to clinical and radiographic progression with atrasentan as compared with placebo in men with metastatic hormonerefractory prostate cancer [59,73,74].
Advances in structural deciphering of biomolecules that are involved in the pathogenesis of bone metastasis, such as OPG, integrins, and MMP, have allowed scientists to design molecules that mimic these critical targets [75]. These artificial, designed molecules can be used to block or increase the activity of a particular therapeutic target, and have significant potential in the treatment of bone metastasis [75,76]. The use of RGD-based peptidomimetics (which contain sequence of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) and MMP inhibitor peptidomimetics in animal models of bone metastasis is associated with smaller size and decreased number of osteolytic lesions [76].
Recent discovery of gene signatures and organ-specific metastasis genes that are predictive of metastatic potential and organ of metastasis, respectively, is a promising step in designing strategies to prevent and treat bone metastasis [15,16]. Further development and validation of bone metastasis specific genes would theoretically allow stratification of cancer patients into good or poor metastatic prognosis and permit patient-tailored therapeutic strategies. However, these types of therapies may not be feasible from an economic standpoint [12,77].

Conclusion
Prevention or limitation of established bone metastasis would significantly improve the quality of lives of patients diagnosed with advanced lung, prostate, or breast cancer. This is especially true for prostate cancer patients, in whom progression of bone metastasis occurs over many years. We must focus our research efforts on elucidating the factors that allow the tumor cells to escape into the circulation, deposit in the bone, and then proliferate to form skeletal lesions. Such work will enable investigators to develop effective treatment modalities to prevent as well as treat bone metastasis.
This article is published as part of Arthritis Research & Therapy Volume 9 Supplement 1, 2007: Basic science, rationale, background and future of denosumab: a RANK ligand inhibitor. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://arthritis-research.com/supplements/9/S1.