Figure 3From: Myofiber stress-response in myositis: parallel investigations on patients and experimental animal models of muscle regeneration and systemic inflammationExpression levels of Grp94, Grp75 and calreticulin in patients' biopsies. (a) Representative western blots of biopsies from Group 0 (S3), Group I (P1, P2, P12, P13), Group II (P20), and Group III patients (P25) stained for Grp94, Grp75, calreticulin (CRT) and actin. The percentage of regenerating fibers (% reg) is indicated above each patient lane. (b) Histograms showing mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) for the normalized Grp75 amount detected in Groups 0, I, II and III (n = 7, 14, 7 and 8, respectively). *Significant difference versus Groups 0 and III (P = 0.01, analysis of variance (ANOVA)). (c) Histograms show mean and SEM of normalized Grp75 amount compared after redistribution of Group I and Group II patients into two new groups based on grading of class I major histocompatibility complex antigen (MHC-I) sarcolemmal immunostaining (see Table 1; n = 11 for MHC-I grade ++ group, 10 for MHC-I grade + group). *Significant difference versus Groups 0 and III (P < 0.005, ANOVA). (d) Histograms showing mean and SEM of normalized calreticulin amount detected in Groups 0, I, II and III (n = 6, 14, 7 and 7, respectively). *Significant difference versus Groups 0 and III (P < 0.01, ANOVA). (e) Histograms showing mean and SEM of normalized calreticulin amount compared after redistribution of Group I and Group II patients, as described for (c). *Significant difference versus all of the groups (P < 0.01, ANOVA).Back to article page