Skip to main content

Table 2 Infectious risk comparing JAK inhibitor and TNF inhibitor users

From: Comparative risk of infections between JAK inhibitors versus TNF inhibitors among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study

 

JAK inhibitor

n = 2 963

TNF inhibitor (Ref)

n = 5 169

HR (95% CI)

Events

PY

aIR (95% CI)

Events

PY

aIR (95% CI)

As-treated analysis

 Herpes zoster

361

3128

11.54 (10.47–12.72)

221

4528

4.88 (4.29–5.55)

2.37 (2.00–2.80)

 Serious herpes zoster

62

3435

1.81 (1.41–2.31)

11

4682

0.24 (0.13–0.42)

7.43 (3.91–14.11)

 Serious bacterial infection

48

3445

1.39 (1.05–1.85)

61

4629

1.32 (1.03–1.69)

1.04 (0.71–1.52)

 Opportunistic infection

4

3489

0.11 (0.04–0.31)

23

4686

0.49 (0.33–0.74)

0.25 (0.09–0.73)

365-day ITT

 Herpes zoster

242

2173

11.14 (9.89–12.54)

211

4072

5.18 (4.54–5.91)

2.15 (1.79–2.59)

 Serious herpes zoster

37

2263

1.64 (1.19–2.25)

12

4156

0.29 (0.16–0.51)

5.77 (3.00–11.12)

 Serious bacterial infection

36

2260

1.59 (1.15–2.20)

61

4133

1.48 (1.15–1.89)

1.08 (0.72–1.63)

 Opportunistic infection

3

2274

0.13 (0.04–0.41)

16

4155

0.39 (0.24–0.63)

0.35 (0.10–1.20)

  1. CI Confidence interval, HR Hazard ratio, IR Incidence rate, ITT Intention-to-treat, PY Person-years
  2. aPer 100 person-years