Table 1 CBPI: quality of life—frequency of scores
Visit | Score | T1 (N = 8), N (%) | T2 (N = 8), N (%) | T3 (N = 8), N (%) | T4 (N = 8), N (%) | P-value Mantel-Haenszel test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day − 21 | 1 = excellent | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Not done |
Day 0 | 4 = fair | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Not done |
Day 7 ± 1 | 3 = good | 2 ( 25.0%) | 6 (75.0%) | 3 (37.5%) | 0 (0.0%) |  |
4 = fair | 6 (75.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | 5 (62.5%) | 8 (100.0%) | 0.018 | |
Total | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Â | |
Day 14 ± 1 | 2 = very good | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |  |
3 = good | 4 (50.0%) | 4 (50.0%) | 4 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.018 | |
4 = fair | 4 (50.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | 4 (50.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Â | |
Total | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Â | |
Day 21 ± 1 | 2 = very good | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |  |
3 = good | 7 (87.5%) | 6 (75.0%) | 6 (75.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | < 0.001 | |
4 = fair | 1 (12.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Â | |
Total | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Â | |
Day 28 ± 1 | 2 = very good | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (62.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |  |
3 = good | 8 (100.0%) | 3 (37.5%) | 6 (75.0%) | 4 (50.0%) | 0.001 | |
4 = fair | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | 4 (50.0%) | Â | |
Total | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Â | |
Day 35 ± 1 | 2 = very good | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (62.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |  |
3 = good | 8 (100.0%) | 3 (37.5%) | 7 (87.5%) | 5 (62.5%) | 0.002 | |
4 = fair | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (12.5%) | 3 (37.5%) | Â | |
Total | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Â | |
Day 42 ± 4 or premature removal | 2 = very good | 1 (12.5%) | 6 (75.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |  |
3 = good | 7 (87.5%) | 2 (25.0%) | 7 (87.5%) | 6 (75.0%) | 0.001 | |
4 = fair | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (12.5%) | 2 (25.0%) | Â | |
Total | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | Â |