Skip to main content

Table 1 P-values computed to compare the effectiveness of b/tsDMARDs in the propensity score-matched groups

From: Management and treatment outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies: evaluation of 10-year data from the KURAMA cohort

Month

DAS28-CRP

CDAI

HAQ

Baseline

1

2

3

6

12

Baseline

1

2

3

6

12

Baseline

1

2

3

6

12

Naïve

 TNFi (n = 84) vs CTLA4-Ig (n = 84)

0.8895

0.0009

0.0379

0.2770

0.0644

0.1696

0.9738

0.0012

0.0241

0.2069

0.0522

0.0734

0.9555

0.2426

0.3540

0.6164

0.0995

0.2158

 IL6Ri (n = 42) vs CTLA4-Ig (n = 42)

0.3924

0.0052

0.0006

0.0581

0.0017

0.0002

0.4478

0.1712

0.0377

0.4847

0.0339

0.0021

0.5205

0.1566

0.1634

0.9074

0.0684

0.0855

Switch

 TNFi (n = 66) vs CTLA4-Ig (n = 66)

0.7118

0.3973

0.7034

0.8598

0.7530

0.5893

0.9324

0.8345

0.5103

0.4629

0.6256

0.9206

0.6335

0.3683

0.1135

0.3937

0.3156

0.2418

 IL6Ri (n = 65) vs CTLA4-Ig (n = 65)

0.6384

0.1762

0.9128

0.4938

0.9962

0.2088

0.8586

0.5670

0.1929

0.2623

0.2064

0.9789

0.5369

0.2064

0.1017

0.3292

0.0777

0.1196

 JAKi (n = 49) vs CTLA4-Ig (n = 49)

0.8015

0.3209

0.4526

0.7115

0.6972

0.1140

0.9185

0.9117

0.7453

0.3853

0.7996

0.6086

0.3997

0.5394

0.4940

0.9882

0.2413

0.2345

  1. TNFi TNF inhibitors, IL6Ri IL-6 receptor inhibitors, CTLA4-Ig abatacept, JAKi Janus kinase inhibitors, DAS28-CRP Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive protein, CDAI Clinical Disease Activity Index, HAQ Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index