Skip to main content

Advertisement

Erratum to: Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies

Article metrics

  • 2240 Accesses

The original article was published in Arthritis Research & Therapy 2008 10:R131

Following publication of our recent article [1], we noticed the following errors:

In the Results section, under the heading 'Confirmation of anti-Rib-P reactivity in 51 samples by other methods', in the first sentence, 39.6% should be 41.2%.

In the same section, the following sentence:

The agreement between the individual methods and the IB was found at 0.57 (P < 0.0001) (ELISA), 0.71 (P < 0.0001), and 0.96 (P < 0.0001) according to the kappa method.

Should read:

The agreement between the individual methods and the IB was found at 0.57 (P < 0.0001) (ELISA), 0.71 (P < 0.0001) (LIA), and 0.96 (P < 0.0001) (EliA(R)) according to the kappa method.

In the results section, under the heading 'Anti-Rib-P reactivity in a systemic lupus erythematosus cohort and controls', in the second sentence, 28% should be 29%.

References

  1. 1.

    Mahler M, Ngo JT, Schulte-Pelkum J, Luettich T, Fritzler MJ: Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008, 10: R131-10.1186/ar2548.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Marvin J Fritzler.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1186/ar2548

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article