Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Heterogeneity of human effector CD4+T cells

Arthritis Research & Therapy200911:257

https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2843

  • Published:

Abstract

For many years the heterogeneity of CD4+ T-helper (Th) cells has been limited to Th1 and Th2 cells, which have been considered not only to be responsible for different types of protective responses, but also for the pathogenesis of many disorders. Th1 cells are indeed protective against intracellular microbes and they are thought to play a pathogenic role in organ-specific autoimmune and other chronic inflammatory disorders. Th2 cells provide protection against helminths, but are also responsible for the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. The identification and cloning of new cytokines has allowed one to enlarge the series of functional subsets of CD4+ Th effector cells. In particular, CD4+ Th cells producing IL-17 and IL-22, named Th17, have been initially implicated in the pathogenesis of many chronic inflammatory disorders instead of Th1 cells. However, the more recent studies in both humans and mice suggest that Th17 cells exhibit a high plasticity toward Th1 cells and that both Th17 and Th1 cells may be pathogenic. More recently, another two subsets of effector CD4+ Th cells, named Th9 and Th22 cells, have been described, even if their pathophysiological meaning is still unclear. Despite the heterogeneity of CD4+ effector Th cells being higher than previously thought and some of their subsets exhibiting high plasticity, the Th1/Th2 paradigm still maintains a strong validity.

Keywords

  • Th17 Cell
  • Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
  • Chronic Inflammatory Disorder
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disorder
  • Purify Th17 Cell

Introduction

CD4+ T-helper (Th) lymphocytes represent a heterogeneous population of cells that play an essential role in adaptive immunity. These cells include effector cells, which are devoted to protection against pathogens, and regulatory T cells (Tregs), which protect against effector responses to autoantigens and also against responses to exogenous antigens when they may become dangerous for the host. The term Th derived from the observation that these cells were critical for helping B cells to produce antibodies in the primary response (humoral immunity). On the other hand, CD4+ T cells were also found to be responsible for the so-called cell-mediated immunity, or delayed-type hypersensitivity, which was characterized by the ability of these cells to induce inflammatory reactions mainly characterized by the activation of macrophages. The prototypic cell-mediated immune response was considered to be the skin papular reaction induced by intradermal injection of tuberculin or purified protein derivative (PPD) in animals infected with tubercular bacilli or in humans naturally infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis or vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG).

The first demonstration of the existence of at least two different populations of CD4+ effector T cells was given in 1972 by Parish and Liew [1]. Injection of multiple doses of flagellin in Wistar rats allowed them to demonstrate that suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity was observed when enhancement of antibody response occurred, suggesting an inverse relationship between humoral and cell-mediated immune response. In 1986 Mosmann and his coworkers showed that the functional heterogeneity of murine CD4+ T cells was due to their different profile of cytokine production [2], a finding that was also confirmed in humans [3, 4]. Murine and human CD4+ T cells were categorized into two main subsets, which were defined as Th type 1 (Th1) or Th type 2 (Th2) [24].

The T-helper type 1/T-helper type 2 paradigm

The reason for the heterogeneity of effector CD4+ Th cells is mainly related to their protective function, because it enables the best type of response according to the nature of the invading microorganism. Th1 cells produce high levels of IFNγ and are responsible for both phagocyte activation and the production of opsonizing and complement-fixing antibodies, thus playing an important role in protection against intracellular pathogens. Th2 cells produce IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13, thus being mainly involved in the protection against parasitic helminths [5]. IL-4 and IL-13 are the major mediator of IgE class switching in B cells [6]. IgE binds to FcεRI on basophils and mast cells, and their interaction with a multivalent ligand induces cross-linking of FcεRI - which leads to the secretion of active mediators such as histamine and serotonin, and to the production of several cytokines and chemokines, including IL-4, IL-13, TNFα and eotaxins. IL-5 positively regulates a large number of eosinophil functions, including eosinophilopoesis, bone marrow release, activation and survival [7]. IL-9 production following infection by helminths contributes to the general mast cell and IgE response characteristic of these infections [8]. In addition to its effect on mast cells and lymphocytes, IL-9 induces mucin production in epithelial cells [9]. To say that Th1 cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity and Th2 cells are responsible for humoral immunity, however, is not correct. Indeed, Th1 cells allow the production of IgG2a antibodies in mice and of IgM, IgA, IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3 antibodies in humans, whereas Th2 cells induce IgG1 and IgE antibodies in mice and IgM, IgG4 and IgE in humans.

The mechanisms responsible for Th1 or Th2 polarization were also discovered. Based on the observation that IL-12 and IFNα, two cytokines produced by dendritic cells, acted as powerful inducers of human Th1 polarization [1012], I hypothesized that the type of innate immunity response was the main conditioning mechanism for the type of subsequent adaptive immunity [13]. This hypothesis was found to be true when the existence in dendritic cells of the so-called Toll-like receptors was observed [14]. The Toll-like receptors are able to interact with a group of highly conserved structures of many bacteria and viruses, and this interaction usually results in the production by dendritic cells of high amounts of IL-12 and/or IFNα, thus explaining the Th1 polarization usually induced by microbial infections. Indeed, IFNα produced by dendritic cells and/or IFNγ produced by natural killer cells upon stimulation by IL-12 activates the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-1 in the naive CD4 T cells. Activated STAT-1 upregulates T-box expressed in T cells (T-bet) expression, which in turn induces early T-cell IFNγ production and upregulates IL-12Rβ2 expression. The IL-12Rβ2-expressing T cells can then directly respond to IL-12 that, through activation of STAT-4, induces high IFNγ production and sustains the expression of IL-12R β2 [15].

Collaboration between interferons and IL-12 therefore induces full Th1 differentiation [1518]. At later stages of Th1 differentiation, IL-18Rα is also upregulated. IL-18Rα upregulation requires IL-12/STAT-4 signalling and is further increased by IFNγ. IL-12 and IL-18 jointly induce IFNγ production by Th1 cells in the absence of T-cell receptor stimulation. Such antigen-independent cytokine production is probably important for amplifying Th1 responses by recruiting other pre-existing Th1 cells [19, 20].

At that time it was also found that Th2 polarization was mainly due to the early production of IL-4 during the primary response [12]. The cell and the mechanisms responsible for this early IL-4 production, however, remained unclear for a long time. Only recently was it found that IL-4 could be produced by the naïve Th cell itself, upon Notch triggering, as a consequence of the expression by the dendritic cells of its ligand Jagged-1 in both mice and humans [2123]. Another possibility is the production by other cell types, such as mast cells and macrophages present in the gut of worm-infested animals or lung epithelial cells, of a more recently discovered cytokine, named IL-25. IL-25 can induce the early production of IL-4 by a non-T, a non-B, c-kit+, a FcεR1- cell or by the Th naïve cell itself, thus allowing its Th2 polarization [24, 25].

The interaction of the endogenous and/or exogenous IL-4 with its receptor results in the activation of STAT-6, which in turn upregulates GATA-binding protein-3 (GATA-3) and c-maf expression [2630]. GATA-3 has been reported to induce its own expression [31], probably when it reaches a threshold level. GATA-3 binds to regions of the Il4/Il13 loci, including DNaseI hypersensitive site Va and conserved noncoding sequence-1 sites. GATA-3 alone, however, is not sufficient to induce IL-4 production. IL-2-mediated activation of STAT-5 plays a critical role in inducing/maintaining accessibility at the second intron HSII and HSIII DNase I hypersensitive sites of the Il4 locus [32]. Indeed, STAT-5 is bound to these two sites in Th2 cells, but not in Th1 cells. The collaboration of STAT-5 and GATA-3 accounts for full Th2 differentiation in vitro [33]. Of note, there is a mutual regulation of Th1 and Th2 polarization induced not only by IL-4 and IFNγ, respectively, but also by the Th1-specific and Th2-specific transcription factors. Accordingly, GATA-3 has been reported to downregulate STAT-4 [34]. Strong STAT-5 activation inhibits T-bet expression [32]. On the other hand, T-bet can suppress GATA-3 expression [35].

In addition to Th1 and Th2 cells, another series of CD4+ T cells were identified as able to produce at the same Th1-related and Th2-related cytokines, which were named Th type 0 (Th0) cells [36]. Because of their functional differences, Th1 and Th2 cells - in addition to having different protective functions against invading pathogens - also contribute to the development of different human disorders: Th1 cells have been thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of organ-specific autoimmune diseases, as well as other chronic inflammatory disorders such as Crohn's disease, sarcoidosis and atherosclerosis [37]; and Th2 cells certainly play a central role in the development of allergic disorders [38].

Beyond the T-helper type 1/T-helper type 2 paradigm

The discovery of T-helper type 17 cells

The Th1/Th2 paradigm was maintained until some years ago when a third subset of CD4+ effector Th cells, named Th type 17 (Th17) cells, was identified [39, 40]. Although the existence of IL-17 as a product of activated CD4+ T cells has been known for more than 10 years, only recently was the existence of Th17 cells as a distinct subset recognized [39, 40]. The breakthrough leading to the discovery of the Th17 lineage came from murine models of autoimmunity. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), collagen-induced arthritis and inflammatory bowel disorders have historically been associated with unchecked Th1 responses, largely based on studies in which disease development was ablated by neutralizing the IL-12p40 chain or by targeting the p40 or IL-12Rβ1 genes [41].

This initial concept of Th1 association with autoimmune disorders, however, required an adjustment with the unexpected discovery that mice deficient in IFNγ or IFNγ receptor were not resistant to EAE but were actually more susceptible to central nervous system autoimmunity [4244]. Moreover, the link with IL-12 in these diseases was called into question by the discovery that a new IL-12 family member, IL-23, shares with IL-12 the p40 subunit - the heterodimer of IL-12 being composed of p40 and p35, and that of IL-23 being composed of p40 and p19 [39]. IL-23 also shares with IL-12 a chain of its receptor - the IL-12 receptor being composed of IL-12Rβ1 and IL-12Rβ2 chains, and that of IL-23 being composed of IL-12Rβ1 and IL-23R chains. After this discovery, it was found that EAE and collagen-induced arthritis did not develop in mice deficient in the IL-23p19 subunit or the IL-23R chain, whereas the diseases could develop in those deficient in the IL-12p35 subunit or the IL-12Rβ2 chain, suggesting that at least in these models IL-23 but not IL-12 is critically linked to autoimmunity [40, 45, 46].

Based on these and other findings, a new role for Th17 cells in immunopathology and the distinct origin of Th1 cells and Th17 cells under differential IL-12 or IL-23 conditioning was proposed [40, 45]. More recently, however, a completely different pathway of murine Th17 origin has been described [4749]. Although IL-23 appeared to be required for Th17-induced immunopathology, different groups independently demonstrated that transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) was required for initiation and that IL-6 was a critical co-factor for Th17 differentiation [4749]. Of note, the Th17-polarizing cytokine TGFβ was already known for its ability to promote the development of Foxp3+ Tregs, but only in the absence of IL-6 [49]. Murine Th17 cells express a master transcription factor different from Th1 and Th2 cells, an orphan receptor known as retinoic acid-related orphan receptor (ROR)γt [50]. A second orphan receptor, named RORα, has also been found to contribute to the development of murine Th17 cells [51]. The STAT-3 transcription factor is also essential for the murine Th17 development, although whether it acts directly or through the activation of RORγt is still unclear [52].

The distinctive cytokine of murine Th17 cells, IL-17A, is involved in the recruitment, activation and migration of neutrophil granulocytes by inducing the production of colony-stimulatory factors and CXCL8 [53] by both macrophages and tissue resident cells. The other cytokines produced by murine Th17 cells, such as IL-17F, IL-21 and IL-22, can also contribute to the activation of mononuclear and/or resident cells and therefore may induce and/or maintain a chronic inflammatory process. Because of their unique ability to recruit neutrophils, however, the main protective function of Th17 cells appears to be the clearance of extracellular pathogens, including fungi [54].

Nevertheless, the major emphasis on the pathophysiology of murine Th17 cells was placed on their determinant or even exclusive pathogenic role on models of autoimmunity. This concept was immediately extrapolated to human disorders that are considered equivalent to the above-mentioned murine models, such as multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disorders [55], but also to psoriasis, contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis [56]. Th17 cells were therefore thought to be the pathogenic cells in virtually all chronic inflammatory disorders, where the effect of Th1 cells-which had been shown to be important in hundreds of previous studies - was underscored or even seen as protective against the Th17-mediated inflammation [57].

Human T-helper type 17 cells may be different from murine T-helper type 17 cells

The studies in humans showed that Th17 cells express RORC, CCR6, CCR4 and the IL-23R, but also CD161 [58] the equivalent of murine NK1.1 [59], and they produce IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, IL-26 and the chemokine CCL20 [6063]. Of note, a substantial proportion of human Th17 cells produce IFNγ in addition to IL-17A, and these cells were named Th17/Th1 [61]. Both Th17 cells and Th17/Th1 cells also expressed the IL-12Rβ2 chain and the Th1-related transcription factor T-bet [61]. Finally, stimulation of human Th17 cells in the presence of IL-12 downregulated RORC and upregulated T-bet, and enabled these cells to produce IFNγ in addition to IL-17A [61].

Another difference between murine and human Th17 cells was found with regard to their origin. While murine Th17 cells originate from a naive Th cell in the presence of TGFβ and IL-6 [4749], human Th17 cells exclusively originate in the presence of IL-1β and IL-23 from a small subset of naïve CD4+ Th cells that express CD161, which are present in the umbilical cord blood and newborn thymus [58]. The role of TGFβ in the differentiation of human Th17 cells is controversial, with some studies indicating that the addition in the culture of exogenous TGFβ is critical for the induction of RORC expression [6466], while other studies do not [58, 62, 63, 67]. Our studies demonstrate that the CD161+ precursors of human Th17 cells present in the umbilical cord blood and thymus already express RORC and IL-23R ex vivo [58], and that exogenous TGFβ may only have an indirect role in the development of Th17 cells, mainly due to its strong suppressive activity on the proliferation of Th1 cells [68]. The expression of CD161 by human Th17 cells has been recently confirmed in both the circulation and the gut of subjects with Crohn's disease [69]. Circulating CD161+ T cells migrate to gut lymphoid tissue, where in normal subjects they require the presence of IL-1β and IL-23 to become fully mature Th17 cells, whereas in the gut of subjects with Crohn's disease the presence of IL-23 is sufficient for this maturation [69].

Boniface and colleagues have recently shown that prostaglandin E2 can act directly on both human and murine T cells to enhance Th17 development [70]. In fact, prostaglandin E2 - acting via the prostaglandin receptor EP2-mediated and EP4-mediated signalling and cAMP pathways - induces upregulation of IL-23 and IL-1 receptor expression in human T cells. Furthermore, prostaglandin E2 synergizes with IL-1β and IL-23 to drive RORC, IL-17, IL-17F, CCL20, and CCR6 expression. Similar results have been obtained by Napolitani and colleagues, who showed that prostaglandin E2 triggering of the EP2 and EP4 receptors expressed on T cells led to a rapid increase of RORC and a decrease of T-bet mRNA [71]. In addition, prostaglandin E2 could favour the enrichment of IL-17-producing cells at inflammatory sites by preferentially inhibiting proliferation of CCR6- T cells, which include Th1 cells, but not proliferation of CCR6+ Th17 cells. Finally, prostaglandin E2 can directly act on T cells and promote Th17 responses independently of the presence of IL-23 while it synergized with IL-1 and IL-6 to favour IL-17 release.

The critical role for IL-1 signalling in the differentiation of Th17 cells has recently been demonstrated even in mice, and it has been shown that in presence of IL-1 the addition of exogenous TGFβ is not essential [72].

Another interesting point is the possible relationship between human Th17 cells and Tregs. A transdifferentiation of Tregs into Th17 cells has been described recently [73, 74], as well as the existence of cells coexpressing IL-17 and Foxp3 [75, 76]. Our findings showing that Th17 cells derive from CD161+ T-cell precursors and maintain CD161 expression even at the stage of memory T cells, whereas Tregs were never been shown to express this marker, apparently argue against such a possibility.

Role of T-helper type 1 and T-helper type 17 cells in pathogenicity

The demonstration of a potential plasticity of human Th17 cells to Th1 cells [61] was of great importance with regard to the controversial issue of the respective roles of the two effector cell types in the pathogenesis of murine and human autoimmune disorders, as well as of other chronic inflammatory disorders. An important clarification on the pathogenicity of murine Th17 cells recently came from four independent studies [7780].

First, not only did the propagation of committed Th17 precursors in the presence of IL-23 without TGFβ result in a progressive extinction of IL-17A and IL-17F and promote the emergence of IFNγ-producing cells that lacked IL-17 expression, but their stimulation with IL-12 induced a rapid, STAT4-dependent and T-bet-dependent transition marked by an extinction of RORγt, RORα, IL-17A and IL-17F and an induction of a Th1-like expression signature [77]. Moreover, the potential plasticity of Th17 to Th1 cells, but not of Th1 to Th17 cells, has been reported [78]. These findings support the substantial developmental plasticity of the Th17 lineage already observed in humans [61], which identified a mechanism for latent Th1-like responsiveness of Th17 cells and provided the basis for understanding the relationship between Th17-mediated and Th1-mediated pathophysiology.

Indeed, it has recently been shown that Th17 cells can promote pancreatic inflammation, but can only induce type 1 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus efficiently in lymphopenic mice after conversion into Th1 cells [79]. Accordingly, highly purified Th17 cells from BDC2.5NOD mice shift into Th1-like cells in NOD/SCID recipient mice. The transferred Th17 cells, completely devoid of IFNγ at the time of transfer, rapidly converted to secrete IFNγ in the NOD/SCID recipients. More importantly, the development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was prevented by the treatment with anti-IFNγ-specific antibody but not with anti-IL17A-specific antibody [80]. The plasticity of Th17 cells into Th1 cells initially observed in humans [61] is therefore now confirmed in mice and provides the basis for supporting again the major pathogenic role of Th17-derived Th1 cells in murine autoimmune or other chronic inflammatory disorders. The relationship between the Th17-derived Th1 cells and the classic Th1 cells obtained in response to IL-12-mediated polarization, however, is not yet clear.

T-helper type 9 cells

An additional subset of CD4+ effector T cells able to produce IL-9 has been recently described [81, 82]. IL-9 was previously known as a Th2-derived cytokine [83], and was found to be important in inducing the mucus hypersecretion in asthmatic subjects [84] and to contribute to the development of tuberculosis by reducing IFNγ production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with M. tuberculosis antigens [85]. When murine Th2 cells were cultured in the presence of IL-4 and TGFβ, they lost the capacity to produce IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, but they maintained the ability to produce IL-9 in addition to IL-10 [81, 82]. The IL-9+IL-10+ T cells demonstrated no regulatory properties despite producing abundant IL-10. By contrast, their adoptive transfer into recombination-activating gene 1-deficient mice induced colitis and peripheral neuritis, the severity of which aggravated whether these cells were transferred with CD45RBhigh effector T cells. This novel Th subset therefore lacks suppressive function and constitutes a distinct population of effector T cells that promote tissue inflammation [81].

More recently, it was found that IL-9 is produced in high amounts not only by Th2 and Th9 cells but also by Th17 cells [86, 87]. More importantly, IL-9 appeared to be a key molecule that affects both differentiation of Th17 cells and Treg function. IL-9 synergized with TGFβ1 to differentiate naïve CD4+ T cells into Th17 cells, while IL-9 secretion by Th17 cells was regulated by IL-23. Interestingly, IL-9 enhanced the suppressive function of Foxp3+CD4+ Tregs in vitro and the absence of IL-9 signalling weakened the suppressive activity of Tregs in vivo, leading to an increase in effector cells and worsening of EAE. Accordingly, it has been recently shown that both IL-9 neutralization and IL-9 receptor deficiency attenuate EAE, and this effect correlates with decreases of Th17 cells and IL-6-producing macrophages in the central nervous system, as well as of mast cell numbers in the regional lymph nodes [86]. These findings suggest a novel role of IL-9 as a regulator of pathogenic versus protective mechanisms of immune responses [86, 87].

T-helper type 22 cells

IL-22 was originally described in mice and humans as a cytokine characteristic of fully differentiated Th17 cells [60]. Recently, however, a distinct subset of human skin-homing memory T cells has been shown to produce IL-22, but neither IL-17 nor IFNγ [88, 89]. Differentiation of IL-22 producing T cells, now named Th22 cells, could be promoted by stimulation of naive T cells in the presence of IL-6 and TNF or by the presence of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and appears to be independent of RORC but dependent upon the aryl hydrocarbon receptor [88, 89]. The human Th22 cell population coexpresses the chemokine receptor CCR6 and the skin-homing receptors CCR4 and CCR10, which led to hypotheses that these cells may be important in skin homeostasis and pathology [88, 89].

Concluding remarks

Very recent studies demonstrate that CD4+ Th effector cells represent a population much more heterogeneous than previously suggested. Beyond Th1 cells and Th2 cells, Th17 cells, Th9 cells and Th11 cells have now been recognized. These main populations of CD4+ effector T cells are depicted in Figure 1. Moreover, CD4+ Th cells seem to exhibit a great plasticity not only in the context of effector responses, but also of regulatory responses. Th2 cells can shift to Th1 cells or to Th9 cells, whereas Th17 cells can shift to Th1 cells. Among different CD4+ effector T cells, the Th1 cells appear to be the more stable. Although this complex situation makes it more difficult to extrapolate the role of different subsets of CD4+ effector cells, the validity of the Th1/Th2 paradigm seems to maintain its validity. Indeed, there is no doubt regarding the main and essential role of Th2 responses against allergens in accounting for the great majority of pathophysiological manifestations in allergic subjects. On the other hand, even if Th17 cells certainly play a pathogenic role in autoimmune disorders and other chronic inflammatory disorders, classic Th1 cells or Th17-derived Th1 cells are also co-pathogenic or even truly responsible for the inflammatory processes that underlie these diseases.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Main populations of CD4 + effector T cells. When the naïve CD4+ T-helper (Th) cell recognizes a given antigen on the surface of the antigen-presenting cell (APC), the cytokines present in the microenvironment created by the response of the innate immunity play a critical role in dictating the type of effector cell that is subsequently induced. In the presence of IL-2 and IL-4, the naïve Th cell expresses the transcription factor GATA-binding protein-3 (GATA-3) and differentiates into a Th2 cell that, because of its ability to produce IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13, is protective against extracellular parasites, but can also be responsible for allergic disorders. In the presence of IL-4 and transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), the Th2 cell can further differentiate into a Th9 cell, which produces IL-9 and IL-10, whose pathophysiological meaning as well as the possibility that they can also directly originate from the naïve Th cell are still unclear. In the presence of interferons (IFNs) and IL-12, the naïve Th cell expresses T-box expressed in T cells (T-bet) and differentiates into a Th1 cell that, because of the production of IFNγ and lymphotoxin-α (LTα), induces delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions that are protective against intracellular bacteria, fungi and protozoa, but can also be responsible for autoimmune disorders such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU), and peptoglycan-induced arthritis (PIA). In the presence of TNF and IL-6, the naïve Th cells express aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and differentiate into a Th22 cell that, because of its production of IL-22 and the expression of skin homing chemokine receptors (CCR4 and CCR10), has been hypothesized to be important in skin homeostasis and pathology. In the presence of TGFβ, IL-6 and IL-21 (in mice) or of IL-1 and IL-23 (in humans), the naïve Th cell expresses retinoic acid-related orphan receptor (ROR)γt and differentiates into a Th17 cell that, because of its production of IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21 and IL-22, is involved in the protection against extracellular bacteria and fungi, but can also be responsible for autoimmune disorders, such as EAE, EAU and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). The possibility that the Th17 cell is flexible and can shift in the presence of IL-12 to Th1 has been observed in both humans and mice. NK, natural killer cell.

Note

This article has been published following the 15ème Journée Romande d'Immunologie Clinique symposium on 20th November 2008, in honour of Prof Jean-Michel Dayer

Abbreviations

EAE: 

experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

GATA-3: 

GATA-binding protein-3

IFN: 

interferon

IL: 

interleukin

ROR: 

retinoic acid-related orphan receptor

STAT: 

signal transducer and activator of transcription

T-bet: 

T-box expressed in T cells

TGFβ: 

transforming growth factor beta

Th: 

T-helper

TNF: 

tumour necrosis factor

Treg: 

regulatory T cell.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Our work was supported by grants from the European Commission (project number LSHB-CT-2005-518167, INNOCHEM, FP6), the Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN prot. 20077NFBH8) and the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro AIRC.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center of Excellence for Research, Transfer of Research and High Education for the Development of Novel Therapies (DENOthe), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 85, Florence, 50134, Italy

References

  1. Parish CR, Liew FY: Immune response to chemically modified flagellin. 3. Enhanced cell-mediated immunity during high and low zone antibody tolerance to flagellin. J Exp Med. 1972, 135: 298-311. 10.1084/jem.135.2.298.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mosmann TR, Cherwinski H, Bond MW, Giedlin MA, Coffman RL: Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol. 1986, 136: 2348-2357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Parronchi P, Macchia D, Piccinni MP, Biswas P, Simonelli C, Maggi E, Ricci M, Ansari AA, Romagnani S: Allergen- and bacterial antigen-specific T-cell clones established from atopic donors show a different profile of cytokine production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 4538-4542. 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4538.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Del Prete GF, De Carli M, Mastromauro C, Biagiotti R, Macchia D, Falagiani P, Ricci M, Romagnani S: Purified protein derivative of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and excretory-secretory antigen(s) of Toxocara canis expand in vitro human T cells with stable and opposite (type 1 T helper or type 2 T helper) profile of cytokine production. J Clin Invest. 1991, 88: 346-350. 10.1172/JCI115300.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Romagnani S: Biology of human TH1 and TH2 cells [review]. J Clin Immunol. 1995, 15: 121-129. 10.1007/BF01543103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kopf M, Le Gros G, Bachmann M, Lamers MC, Bluethmann H, Kohler G: Disruption of the murine IL-4 gene blocks Th2 cytokine responses. Nature. 1993, 362: 245-248. 10.1038/362245a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coffman RL, Seymour BW, Hudak S, Jackson J, Rennick D: Antibody to interleukin-5 inhibits helminth-induced eosinophilia in mice. Science. 1989, 245: 308-310. 10.1126/science.2787531.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Faulkner H, Renauld J, Van Snick J, Grencis RK: Interleukin-9 enhances resistance to the intestinal nematode Trichuris muris. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 3832-3840.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Longphre M, Li D, Gallup M, Drori E, Ordoñez CL, Redman T, Wenzel S, Bice DE, Fahy JV, Basbaum C: Allergen-induced IL-9 directly stimulates mucin transcription in respiratory epithelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1999, 104: 1375-1382. 10.1172/JCI6097.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Manetti R, Parronchi P, Giudizi MG, Piccinni MP, Maggi E, Trinchieri G, Romagnani S: Natural killer cell stimulatory factor (interleukin 12 [IL-12]) induces T helper type 1 (Th1)-specific immune responses and inhibits the development of IL-4-producing Th cells. J Exp Med. 1993, 177: 1199-1204. 10.1084/jem.177.4.1199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Manetti R, Annunziato F, Tomasevic L, Giannò V, Parronchi P, Romagnani S, Maggi E: Polyinosinic acid: polycytidylic acid promotes T helper type 1-specific immune responses by stimulating macrophage production of interferon-alpha and interleukin-12. Eur J Immunol. 1995, 25: 2656-2660. 10.1002/eji.1830250938.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Parronchi P, De Carli M, Manetti R, Simonelli C, Sampognaro S, Piccinni MP, Macchia D, Maggi E, Del Prete G, Romagnani S: IL-4 and IFN (alpha and gamma) exert opposite regulatory effects on the development of cytolytic potential by Th1 or Th2 human T cell clones. J Immunol. 1992, 149: 2977-2983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Romagnani S: Induction of TH1 and TH2 responses: a key role for the 'natural' immune response?. Immunol Today. 1992, 13: 379-381. 10.1016/0167-5699(92)90083-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T: Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat Immunol. 2001, 2: 675-680. 10.1038/90609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Szabo SJ, Dighe AS, Gubler U, Murphy KM: Regulation of the interleukin (IL)-12Rβ2 subunit expression in developing T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells. J Exp Med. 1997, 185: 817-824. 10.1084/jem.185.5.817.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Afkarian M, Sedy JR, Yang J, Jacobson NG, Cereb N, Yang SY, Murphy TL, Murphy KM: T-bet is a STAT1-induced regulator of IL-12R expression in naïve CD4+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2002, 3: 549-557. 10.1038/ni794.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Murphy KM, Reiner SL: The lineage decisions of helper T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002, 2: 933-944. 10.1038/nri954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hibbert L, Pflanz S, De Waal Malefyt R, Kastelein RA: IL-27 and IFN-α signal via Stat1 and Stat3 and induce T-Bet and IL-12Rβ2 in naive T cells. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2003, 23: 513-522. 10.1089/10799900360708632.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Smeltz RB, Chen J, Ehrhardt R, Shevach EM: Role of IFN-gamma in Th1 differentiation: IFN-gamma regulates IL-18R alpha expression by preventing the negative effects of IL-4 and by inducing/maintaining IL-12 receptor beta 2 expression. J Immunol. 2002, 168: 6165-6172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Okazawa A, Kanai T, Watanabe M, Yamazaki M, Inoue N, Ikeda M, Kurimoto M, Ishii H, Hibi T: Th1-mediated intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease may be induced by activation of lamina propria lymphocytes through synergistic stimulation of interleukin-12 and interleukin-18 without T cell receptor engagement. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002, 97: 3108-3117. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07107.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Amsen D, Blander JM, Lee GR, Tanigaki K, Honjo T, Flavell RA: Instruction of distinct CD4 T helper cell fates by different notch ligands on antigen-presenting cells. Cell. 2004, 117: 515-526. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00451-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Amsen D, Antov A, Jankovic D, Sher A, Radtke F, Souabni A, Busslinger M, McCright B, Gridley T, Flavell RA: Direct regulation of Gata3 expression determines the T helper differentiation potential of Notch. Immunity. 2007, 27: 89-99. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.021.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liotta F, Frosali F, Querci V, Mantei A, Filì L, Maggi L, Mazzinghi B, Angeli R, Ronconi E, Santarlasci V, Biagioli T, Lasagni L, Ballerini C, Parronchi P, Scheffold A, Cosmi L, Maggi E, Romagnani S, Annunziato F: Human immature myeloid dendritic cells trigger a TH2-polarizing program via Jagged-1/Notch interaction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008, 121: 1000-1005. 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Owyang AM, Zaph C, Wilson EH, Guild KJ, McClanahan T, Miller HR, Cua DJ, Goldschmidt M, Hunter CA, Kastelein RA, Artis D: Interleukin 25 regulates type 2 cytokine-dependent immunity and limits chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. J Exp Med. 2006, 203: 843-849. 10.1084/jem.20051496.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fallon PG, Ballantyne SJ, Mangan NE, Barlow JL, Dasvarma A, Hewett DR, McIlgorm A, Jolin HE, McKenzie AN: Identification of an interleukin (IL)-25-dependent cell population that provides IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 at the onset of helminth expulsion. J Exp Med. 2006, 203: 1105-1116. 10.1084/jem.20051615.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurata H, Lee HJ, O'Garra A, Arai N: Ectopic expression of activated Stat6 induces the expression of Th2-specific cytokines and transcription factors in developing Th1 cells. Immunity. 1999, 11: 677-688. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80142-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhu J, Guo L, Watson CJ, Hu-Li J, Paul WE: Stat6 is necessary and sufficient for IL-4's role in Th2 differentiation and cell expansion. J Immunol. 2001, 166: 7276-7281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu J, Min B, Hu-Li J, Watson CJ, Grinberg A, Wang Q, Killeen N, Urban JF, Guo L, Paul WE: Conditional deletion of Gata3 shows its essential function in T(H)1-T(H)2 responses. Nat Immunol. 2004, 5: 1157-1165. 10.1038/ni1128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pai SY, Truitt ML, Ho IC: GATA-3 deficiency abrogates the development and maintenance of T helper type 2 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 1993-1998. 10.1073/pnas.0308697100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim JI, Ho IC, Grusby MJ, Glimcher LH: The transcription factor c-Maf controls the production of interleukin-4 but not other Th2 cytokines. Immunity. 1999, 10: 745-751. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80073-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ouyang W, Löhning M, Gao Z, Assenmacher M, Ranganath S, Radbruch A, Murphy KM: Stat6-independent GATA-3 auto-activation directs IL-4-independent Th2 development and commitment. Immunity. 2000, 12: 27-37. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80156-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhu J, Cote-Sierra J, Guo L, Paul WE: Stat5 activation plays a critical role in Th2 differentiation. Immunity. 2003, 19: 739-748. 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00292-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhu J, Yamane H, Cote-Sierra J, Guo L, Paul WE: GATA-3 promotes Th2 responses through three different mechanisms: induction of Th2 cytokine production, selective growth of Th2 cells and inhibition of Th1 cell-specific factors. Cell Res. 2006, 16: 3-10. 10.1038/sj.cr.7310002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Usui T, Nishikomori R, Kitani A, Strober W: GATA-3 suppresses Th1 development by downregulation of Stat4 and not through effects on IL-12Rβ2 chain or T-bet. Immunity. 2003, 18: 415-428. 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00057-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Usui T, Preiss JC, Kanno Y, Yao ZJ, Bream JH, O'Shea JJ, Strober W: T-bet regulates Th1 responses through essential effects on GATA-3 function rather than on IFNG gene acetylation and transcription. J Exp Med. 2006, 203: 755-766. 10.1084/jem.20052165.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mosmann TR, Sad S: The expanding universe of T-cell subsets: Th1, Th2 and more. Immunol Today. 1996, 17: 138-146. 10.1016/0167-5699(96)80606-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Romagnani S: The Th1/Th2 paradigm. Immunol Today. 1997, 18: 263-266. 10.1016/S0167-5699(97)80019-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Romagnani S: The role of lymphocytes in allergic disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000, 105: 399-408. 10.1067/mai.2000.104575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Oppmann B, Lesley R, Blom B, Timans JC, Xu Y, Hunte B, Vega F, Yu N, Wang J, Singh K, Zonin F, Vaisberg E, Churakova T, Liu M, Gorman D, Wagner J, Zurawski S, Liu Y, Abrams JS, Moore KW, Rennick D, de Waal-Malefyt R, Hannum C, Bazan JF, Kastelein RA: Novel p19 protein engages IL-12p40 to form a cytokine, IL-23, with biological activities similar as well as distinct from IL-12. Immunity. 2000, 13: 715-725. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00070-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Cua DJ, Sherlock J, Chen Y, Murphy CA, Joyce B, Seymour B, Lucian L, To W, Kwan S, Churakova T, Zurawski S, Wiekowski M, Lira SA, Gorman D, Kastelein RA, Sedgwick JD: Interleukin-23 rather than interleukin-12 is the critical cytokine for autoimmune inflammation of the brain. Nature. 2003, 421: 744-748. 10.1038/nature01355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gately MK, Renzetti LM, Magram J, Stern AS, Adorini L, Gubler U, Presky DH: The interleukin-12/interleukin-12-receptor system: role in normal and pathologic immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998, 16: 495-521. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Krakowski M, Owens T: Interferon-gamma confers resistance to experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Eur J Immunol. 1996, 26: 1641-1646. 10.1002/eji.1830260735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Willenborg DO, Fordham S, Bernard CC, Cowden WB, Ramshaw IA: IFN-gamma plays a critical down-regulatory role in the induction and effector phase of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 1996, 157: 3223-3227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Willenborg DO, Fordham SA, Staykova MA, Ramshaw IA, Cowden WB: IFN-gamma is critical to the control of murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis and regulates both in the periphery and in the target tissue: a possible role for nitric oxide. J Immunol. 1999, 163: 5278-5286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Murphy CA, Langrish CL, Chen Y, Blumenschein W, McClanahan T, Kastelein RA, Sedgwick JD, Cua DJ: Divergent pro-and anti-inflammatory roles for IL-23 and IL-12 in joint autoimmune inflammation. J Exp Med. 2003, 198: 1951-1958. 10.1084/jem.20030896.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. McGeachy MJ, Chen Y, Tato CM, Laurence A, Joyce-Shaikh B, Blumenschein WM, McClanahan TK, O'Shea JJ, Cua DJ: The interleukin 23 receptor is essential for the terminal differentiation of interleukin 17-producing effector T helper cells in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2009, 10: 314-324. 10.1038/ni.1698.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Bettelli E, Carrier Y, Gao W, Korn T, Strom TB, Oukka M, Weiner HL, Kuchroo VK: Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector Th17 and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2006, 441: 235-238. 10.1038/nature04753.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mangan PR, Harrington LE, O'Quinn DB, Helms WS, Bullard DC, Elson CO, Hatton RD, Wahl SM, Schoeb TR, Weaver CT: Transforming growth factor-beta induces development of the T(H)17 lineage. Nature. 2006, 441: 231-234. 10.1038/nature04754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Veldhoen M, Hocking RJ, Atkins CJ, Locksley RM, Stockinger B: TGF-beta in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells. Immunity. 2006, 25: 179-189. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.01.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Ivanov II, McKenzie BS, Zhou L, Tadokoro CE, Lepelley A, Lafaille JJ, Cua DJ, Littman DR: The orphan nuclear receptor RORγt directs the differentiation program of proinflammatopry IL-17+T helper cells. Cell. 2006, 126: 1121-1131. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang XO, Pappu BP, Nurieva R, Akimzhanov A, Kang HS, Chung Y, Ma L, Shah B, Panopoulos AD, Schluns KS, Watowich SS, Tian Q, Jetten AM, Dong C: T helper 17 lineage differentiation is programmed by orphan nuclear receptors ROR alpha and ROR gamma. Immunity. 2008, 28: 29-39. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.11.016.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Chen Z, Laurence A, O'Shea JJ: Signal transduction pathways and transcriptional regulation in the control of Th17 differentiation. Semin Immunol. 2007, 19: 400-408. 10.1016/j.smim.2007.10.015.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ouyang W, Koli JK, Zheng Y: The biological functions of T helper 17 cell effector cytokines in inflammation. Immunity. 2008, 28: 454-467. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Dubin PJ, Kolls JK: Th17 cytokines and mucosal immunity. Immunol Rev. 2008, 226: 160-171. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00703.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Fouser LA, Wright JF, Dunussi-Joannopoulos K, Collins M: Th17 cytokines and their emerging roles in inflammation and autoimmunity. Immunol Rev. 2008, 226: 87-102. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00712.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. van Beelen AJ, Teunissen MB, Kapsenberg ML, de Jong EC: Interleukin-17 in inflammatory skin disorders. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 7: 374-381. 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3282ef869e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Chen Z, O'Shea JJ: Th17 cells: a new fate for differentiating helper T cells. Immunol Res. 2008, 41: 87-102. 10.1007/s12026-007-8014-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Cosmi L, De Palma R, Santarlasci V, Maggi L, Capone M, Frosali F, Rodolico G, Querci V, Abbate G, Angeli R, Berrino L, Fambrini M, Caproni M, Tonelli F, Lazzeri E, Parronchi P, Liotta F, Maggi E, Romagnani S, Annunziato F: Human interleukin 17-producing cells originate from a CD161+CD4+ T cell precursor. J Exp Med. 2008, 205: 1903-1916. 10.1084/jem.20080397.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lanier LL, Chang C, Philips JH: Human NKR-P1A. A disulphide-linked homodimer of the C-type lectin superfamily expressed by a subset of NK and T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1994, 153: 2417-2428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Acosta-Rodriguez EV, Rivino L, Geginat J, Jarrossay D, Gattorno M, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F, Napolitani G: Surface phenotype and antigenic specificity of human interleukin 17-producing T helper memory cells. Nat Immunol. 2007, 8: 639-646. 10.1038/ni1467.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Annunziato F, Cosmi L, Santarlasci V, Maggi L, Liotta F, Mazzinghi B, Parente E, Filì L, Ferri S, Frosali F, Giudici F, Romagnani P, Parronchi P, Tonelli F, Maggi E, Romagnani S: Phenotypic and functional features of human Th17 cells. J Exp Med. 2007, 204: 1849-1861. 10.1084/jem.20070663.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson NJ, Boniface K, Chan JR, McKenzie BS, Blumenschein WM, Mattson JD, Basham B, Smith K, Chen T, Morel F, Lecron JC, Kastelein RA, Cua DJ, McClanahan TK, Bowman EP, de Waal Malefyt R: Development, cytokine profile and function of human interleukin 17-producing helper T cells. Nat Immunol. 2007, 8: 950-957. 10.1038/ni1497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Chen Z, Tato CM, Muul L, Laurence A, O'Shea JJ: Distinct regulation of interleukin-17 in human T helper lymphocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56: 2936-2946. 10.1002/art.22866.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Manel N, Unutmaz D, Littman DR: The differentiation of human Th17 cells requires transforming growth factor-β and induction of the nuclear receptor RORγt. Nat Immunol. 2008, 9: 641-649. 10.1038/ni.1610.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Volpe E, Servant N, Zollinger R, Bogiatzi SI, Hupé P, Barillot E, Soumelis V: A critical function for transforming growth factor-β, interleukin-23 and proinflammatory cytokines in driving and modulating human Th17 responses. Nat Immunol. 2008, 9: 650-957. 10.1038/ni.1613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Yang L, Anderson DE, Baecher-Allan C, Hastings WD, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK, Hafler DA: IL-21 and TGF-β are required for differentiation of human T(H)17 cells. Nature. 2008, 454: 350-352. 10.1038/nature07021.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Acosta-Rodriguez EV, Napolitani G, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F: Interleukins 1β and 6 but not transforming growth factor-beta are essential for the differentiation of interleukin 17-producing human T helper cells. Nat Immunol. 2007, 8: 942-949. 10.1038/ni1496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Santarlasci V, Maggi L, Capone M, Frosali F, Querci V, De Palma R, Liotta F, Cosmi L, Maggi E, Romagnani S, Annunziato F: TGF-beta indirectly favors the development of human Th17 cells by inhibiting Th1 cells. Eur J Immunol. 2009, 39: 207-215. 10.1002/eji.200838748.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kleinschek MA, Boniface K, Sadekova S, Grein J, Murphy EE, Turner SP, Raskin L, Desai B, Faubion WA, de Waal Malefyt R, Pierce RH, McClanahan T, Kastelein RA: Circulating and gut-resident human Th17 cells express CD161 and promote intestinal inflammation. J Exp Med. 2009, 206: 525-534. 10.1084/jem.20081712.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Boniface K, Bak-Jensen KS, Li Y, Blumenschein WM, McGeachy MJ, McClanahan TK, McKenzie BS, Kastelein RA, Cua DJ, de Waal Malefyt R: Prostaglandin E2 regulates Th17 cell differentiation and function through cyclic AMP and EP2/EP4 receptor signaling. J Exp Med. 2009, 206: 535-548. 10.1084/jem.20082293.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Napolitani G, Acosta-Rodriguez EV, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F: Prostaglandin E2 enhances Th17 responses via modulation of IL-17 and IFN-gamma production by memory CD4+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2009, 39: 1301-1312. 10.1002/eji.200838969.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Chung Y, Chang SH, Martinez GJ, Yang XO, Nurieva R, Kang HS, Ma L, Watowich SS, Jetten AM, Tian Q, Dong C: Critical regulation of early Th17 cell differentiation by interleukin-1 signaling. Immunity. 2009, 30: 576-587. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.02.007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Koenen HJ, Smeets RL, Vink PM, van Rijssen E, Boots AM, Joosten I: Human CD25highFoxp3pos regulatory T cells differentiate into IL-17-producing cells. Blood. 2008, 112: 2340-2352. 10.1182/blood-2008-01-133967.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Deknuydt F, Bioley G, Valmori D, Ayyoub M: IL-1β and IL-2 convert human Treg into T(H)17 cells. Clin Immunol. 2009, 131: 298-307. 10.1016/j.clim.2008.12.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Beriou G, Costantino CM, Ashley CW, Yang L, Kuchroo VK, Baecher-Allan C, Hafler DA: IL-17-producing human peripheral regulatory T cells retain suppressive function. Blood. 2009, 113: 4240-4249. 10.1182/blood-2008-10-183251.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Voo KS, Wang YH, Santori FR, Boggiano C, Wang YH, Arima K, Bover L, Hanabuchi S, Khalili J, Marinova E, Zheng B, Littman DR, Liu YJ: Identification of IL-17-producing FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 4793-4798. 10.1073/pnas.0900408106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Lee YK, Turner H, Maynard CL, Oliver JR, Chen D, Elson CO, Weaver CT: Late developmental plasticity in the T helper 17 lineage. Immunity. 2009, 30: 92-107. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Wei G, Wei L, Zhu J, Zang C, Hu-Li J, Yao Z, Cui K, Kanno Y, Roh TY, Watford WT, Schones DE, Peng W, Sun HW, Paul WE, O'Shea JJ, Zhao K: Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+T cells. Immunity. 2009, 30: 155-167. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.12.009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Martin-Orozco N, Chung Y, Chang SH, Wang YH, Dong C: Th17 cells promote pancreatic inflammation but only induce diabetes efficiently in lymphopenic hosts after conversion into Th1 cells. Eur J Immunol. 2009, 39: 216-224. 10.1002/eji.200838475.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Bending D, De La Peña H, Veldhoen M, Phillips JM, Uyttenhove C, Stockinger B, Cooke A: Highly purified Th17 cells from BDC2.5NOD mice convert into Th1-like cells in NOD/SCID recipient mice. J Clin Invest. 2009.Google Scholar
  81. Dardalhon V, Awasthi A, Kwon H, Galileos G, Gao W, Sobel RA, Mitsdoerffer M, Strom TB, Elyaman W, Ho IC, Khoury S, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK: IL-4 inhibits TGF-beta-induced Foxp3+ T cells and, together with TGF-beta, generates IL-9+ IL-10+ Foxp3(-) effector T cells. Nat Immunol. 2008, 9: 1347-1355. 10.1038/ni.1677.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Veldhoen M, Uyttenhove C, van Snick J, Helmby H, Westendorf A, Buer J, Martin B, Wilhelm C, Stockinger B: Transforming growth factor-beta 'reprograms' the differentiation of T helper 2 cells and promotes an interleukin 9-producing subset. Nat Immunol. 2008, 9: 1341-1346. 10.1038/ni.1659.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Gessner A, Blum H, Röllinghoff M: Differential regulation of IL-9-expression after infection with Leishmania major in susceptible and resistant mice. Immunobiology. 1993, 189: 419-435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Louahed J, Toda M, Jen J, Hamid Q, Renauld JC, Levitt RC, Nicolaides NC: Interleukin-9 upregulates mucus expression in the airways. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000, 22: 649-656.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu B, Huang C, Kato-Maeda M, Hopewell PC, Daley CL, Krensky AM, Clayberger C: IL-9 is associated with an impaired Th1 immune response in patients with tuberculosis. Clin Immunol. 2008, 126: 202-210. 10.1016/j.clim.2007.09.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Nowak EC, Weaver CT, Turner H, Begum-Haque S, Becher B, Schreiner B, Coyle AJ, Kasper LH, Noelle RJ: IL-9 as a mediator of Th17-driven inflammatory disease. J Exp Med. 2009, 206: 1653-1660. 10.1084/jem.20090246.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Elyaman W, Bradshaw EM, Uyttenhove C, Dardalhon V, Awasthi A, Imitola J, Bettelli E, Oukka M, van Snick J, Renauld JC, Kuchroo VK, Khoury SJ: IL-9 induces differentiation of TH17 cells and enhances function of FoxP3+ natural regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 12885-12890. 10.1073/pnas.0812530106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Duhen T, Geiger R, Jarrossay D, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F: Production of interleukin 22 but not interleukin 17 by a subset of human skin-homing memory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2009, 10: 857-863. 10.1038/ni.1767.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Trifari S, Kaplan CD, Tran EH, Crellin NK, Spits H: Identification of a human helper T cell population that has abundant production of interleukin 22 and is distinct from T(H)-17, T(H)1 and T(H)2 cells. Nat Immunol. 2009, 10: 864-871. 10.1038/ni.1770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2009

Advertisement