Interleukin-6: a local pain trigger?

Abstract

Pain management in conditions of chronic inflammation is a clinical challenge, and increasing our understanding of the mechanisms driving this type of pain is important. In the previous issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy, Boettger and colleagues examine the role of IL-6 in antigen-induced arthritis using the IL-6 neutralizing soluble glycoprotein 130 and link IL-6 to a pathophysiological role in the generation of pain, independent of the proinflammatory properties of IL-6. The findings presented in this study add to a growing body of evidence highlighting the role of IL-6 in the induction and maintenance of pain.

Adequate pain management in conditions of chronic inflammation, such as rheumatoid arthritis, is a clinical challenge. While pain-relieving drugs such as cyclo-oxygenase-inhibitors and opioids work well in the short term, long-term use is frequently associated with side effects. The ongoing search for novel drugs for treatment of chronic pain is therefore well motivated. Proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL-1 and IL-6 are major mediators of joint inflammation and destruction, and an increasing pool of preclinical data indicates that these cytokines are also key players in the generation and maintenance of pain. In the previous issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy, Boettger and colleagues focus on IL -6 and report that this cytokine plays a significant role in arthritis-induced joint pain [1].

IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine, with proinflammatory and other regulatory properties. IL-6 exerts its effect on target cells by binding to the IL-6 specific membrane receptor (IL-6R), which activates the transducer glycoprotein 130 (gp130), the second subunit of the IL-6R complex. Neurons are devoid of membrane-bound IL-6R, but these cells can still react to IL-6 when IL-6 is bound to the soluble form of IL-6R. The IL-6/soluble IL-6R complex activates gp130, which is expressed on most cells, including neurons. While the functional role of gp130 expressed on neurons is not well understood, this protein has been linked to sensitization of pain-sensing nerves through activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, protein kinase C-delta and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathways and through regulation of the pain-activated ion channel TRPV1 [2, 3]. Using soluble glycoprotein 130 (sgp130), which binds and inactivates IL-6, Boettger and colleagues made several important findings utilizing a rat model of antigen-induced arthritis.

First, the authors report that intraarticular administration of sgp130 attenuates arthritis-induced pain. This is an important finding as it suggests that IL-6 is a pain mediator - not only following nerve injury and tumor growth as has been reported earlier [2, 3], but also subsequent to inflammatory arthritis. The pain-relieving (antinociceptive) effect of local versus systemic injections of sgp130 was investigated, and, surprisingly, intraarticular injection of gp130 to the knee joint had a greater antinociceptive effect than intraperitoneal injections. This may be interpreted as local IL-6 in the joint being crucial for the nociceptive response, while circulating IL-6 is not. In such a case, one would expect a higher dose of systemic spg130 than used in Boettger and colleagues' study to have similar pain-relieving effects, given that it reaches the joint in high enough concentrations.

From a clinical perspective it is critical that a pain-relieving drug has the ability to reverse already-established hypersensitivity, particularly in conditions such as arthritis where pain often is what brings the patient to seek medical attention. In the work presented by Boettger and colleagues, intraperitoneal post-treatment only decreased stimulus-evoked pain responses while intraarticular pretreatment had a broad antinociceptive effect, also normalizing weight bearing, loco-motion and gait - measures thought to indirectly reflect ongoing pain. Because the routes of administration were different in the pretreatment versus post-treatment comparison (intraarticular versus intraperitoneal, respectively), further studies are warranted to determine whether IL-6 inhibition is antinociceptive when administrated during active arthritis. This determination is particularly important from the aspect of the antigen-induced arthritis model being predictive of the human condition, as clinical studies have shown that rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with monoclonal IL-6R antibody score lower on the pain visual analog scale and report a reduced number of tender joints [4].

Another noteworthy finding is that while one injection of sgp130 into the joint had an antinociceptive effect that lasted several days, no concurrent reduction of the joint inflammation was observed. Blocking IL-6-mediated signaling, even in the presence of other factors that continuously drive the inflammatory process, is therefore sufficient to bring the nociceptive thresholds back towards normal levels. In support of this notion, it has been demonstrated that IL- 6 can trigger activation of pain fibers in the absence of inflammation. Exposure to IL-6 sensitizes both peripheral and spinal sensory neurons by electrophysiological measures [5–7], and application of IL-6 to the peripheral nerve or into the cerebrospinal fluid evokes long-lasting pain behavior [7, 8], indicating that the IL6/soluble IL-6R complex may be acting directly on neurons. This does not exclude, however, the fact that IL-6 is also involved in the regulation of pain processing through actions on non-neuronal cells. For example, IL-6 is elevated in the spinal cord subsequent to peripheral nerve injury in rats, which has been linked to microglia activation and associated neuropathic pain [3, 8].

Finally, Boettger and colleagues found that although sgp130 failed to attenuate joint inflammation, bone erosion was reduced in the antigen-induced arthritis model. The structure-sparing effect of sgp130 is in line with recent work showing that IL-6R inhibition blocks osteoclast formation in vitro and in vivo, independent of the anti-inflammatory effect [9], and that bone erosion is reduced in rheumatoid arthritis patients on IL-6 inhibitor monotherapy [10]. The antinociceptive effect observed in the study by Boettger and colleagues was therefore possibly at least partly related to a prevention of joint destruction. This observation highlights the need for gaining a better and more detailed understanding of how bone erosion affects the sensory system.

In summary, there are several potential sites and mechanisms through which IL-6 may drive pain in conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. While there are still critical steps to take before adding IL-6 blockers to the list of painkillers, it is an intriguing thought that anticytokine therapies have the potential to become new tools for treatment of chronic pain.