Skip to content


  • Editorial
  • Open Access

Moving towards personalized medicine in rheumatoid arthritis

  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 2Email author
Arthritis Research & Therapy201416:110

  • Received: 25 March 2014
  • Accepted: 12 May 2014
  • Published:


To develop personalized medicine strategies for improvement of patient management in rheumatoid arthritis, the clinical and molecular properties of the individual patients need to be well characterized. A crucial step in this approach is to discover subgroups of patients that are characterized by a good or poor treatment outcome. Dennis and colleagues have identified distinct pretreatment gene expression profiles in affected synovial tissue specimens and a tissue type-related systemic protein pattern which are associated with a positive or negative clinical outcome to monotherapy with adalumimab (anti-TNFα) and tocilizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor). These observations assign biological pathways associated with response outcome and provide evidence for the existence of systemic, easy-to-measure predictive biomarkers for clinical benefit of these biologics.

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), therapies with biologics targeting TNFα, IL-6 receptor, T-cell co-stimulation, and B cells are successfully used worldwide. Since not all patients benefit from these specific therapies, there is a strong unmet need for pretreatment predictions on therapy outcome. This concept of personalizing treatment has raised interest in the discovery of clinically applicable pretreatment biomarkers to make predictions on outcome before the start of treatment. In this issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy, Dennis and colleagues [1] report on two tissue type-related blood-based protein biomarkers that are associated with the clinical response to adalimumab (anti-TNFα) and tocilizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor).

Global gene expression profiling is a powerful method for biomarker discovery purposes and has proven to be useful in the identification of potentially useful biomarkers in cancer [2, 3]. In RA, this approach yielded a potentially useful blood-based biomarker for the prediction of outcome of B-cell depletion therapy using rituximab [4]. However, very inconsistent results were obtained for TNF blockers, raising skepticism about the clinical utility of the reported gene signatures [5, 6]. These controversial results for TNF blockers may indicate the complex interplay between pathogenesis and anti-TNF pharmacology in RA.

Dennis and colleagues [1] describe a multistep process to identify predictive biomarkers in serum for adalimumab and tocilizumab. Their study is based on the premise of the existence of different molecular synovial phenotypes between patients with RA, as has been noted before [7]. Firstly, the authors identified four clearly distinct molecular synovial phenotypes by using global expression profiling. Gene ontology analysis indicated the existence of two inflammatory axes: one with a lymphoid phenotype, characterized by B-cell abundance, and another with a myeloid phenotype, characterized by activated M1-monocyte enrichment. The remaining two subtypes represented a low inflammatory phenotype and a fibroblast activation phenotype.

Secondly, only the myeloid phenotype appeared to be associated with European League Against Rheumatism good-versus-poor response to the TNF blocker infliximab. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 77% for the myeloid-associated gene set, indicating that pretreatment transcript levels of the synovial myeloid phenotype could potentially enrich for good responders to TNF blockers.

Thirdly, to translate these findings to a more easily accessible compartment, the authors focused on two genes, C-X-C motif chemokine 13 (CXCL13) and the intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), enriched in the lymphoid and myeloid synovial phenotypes, respectively, each encoding a soluble product that could serve as a systemic biomarker. Subsequent measurements of CXCL13 and soluble ICAM1 (sICAM1) in pretreatment serum samples from the ADACTA (ADalimumab ACTemrA) trial (comparing adalimumab with tocilizumab) revealed that CXCL13low/sICAM1high patients had the highest American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-based clinical responses to adalimumab after 24 weeks, whereas CXCL13high/sICAM1low patients had the highest responses to tocilizumab. ROC AUC values for the individual biomarkers reached 65%, based on ACR 50% improvement criteria response outcome.

The scientific value of these findings comes from the identification of two distinct highly inflammatory synovial tissue subtypes that appear to be key to identifying anti-TNFα and anti-IL-6 receptor responders. This corroborates findings from others of a correlation between baseline macrophages and TNFα levels with clinical response [8, 9]. Successful action of TNFα blockers may rely on the presence of a myeloid phenotype representing inflammatory M1 monocytes, which may constitute a key lineage in TNFα-activated nuclear factor-kappa-B-driven synovitis. The TNFα-regulated and membrane-shed ICAM1 appears to be an exponent of the myeloid tissue phenotype. In contrast, the B-cell dominant highly inflammatory lymphoid phenotype appears to be selectively driven by the IL-6/IL-6 receptor pathway and its JAK/STAT-associated transcription factor STAT3. Surprisingly, this phenotype was not characterized by selective expression of IL-6 or IL-6-related genes (IL-6R, IL-6ST/gp130, and STAT3), indicative of the pleiotropic role of IL-6 in different processes of human biology associated with different tissue subsets. Synovium-derived circulating CXCL13 as a B-cell chemoattractant could explain B-cell trafficking into lymphoid phenotype tissues. Since CXCL13 is selectively expressed by follicular dendritic cells, it remains to be established whether the lymphoid phenotype is associated with the presence of ectopic germinal centers.

Although the results of Dennis and colleagues [1] are scientifically important and demonstrate the importance of gene expression profiling in the search for predictive biomarkers, the individual patient-based ROC analyses show only modest predictive ability and therefore weak clinical utility. As mentioned by the authors, the problem for the weak performance may lie in the linear rather than discrete distribution of the synovial phenotypes. Therefore, further refinement and incorporation of additional biomarkers may improve the clinical utility.

All together, these results indicate that molecular phenotyping of patients with RA clearly contributes to the development of a personalized medicine approach for TNFα and IL-6 blockade. Moreover, detailed analysis of specific patterns may lead to new therapeutic avenues. Usage of predictive biomarkers in combination with those for other biologics, such as rituximab, might lead to an early-triage approach for enrichment of those patients most likely to respond to a distinct biologic in RA.



American College of Rheumatology


Area under the curve


C-X-C motif chemokine 13


Intercellular adhesion molecule 1




Rheumatoid arthritis


Receiver operating characteristic


Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1


Tumor necrosis factor.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Pathology, Section of Inflammatory Disease Profiling, VU University Medical Center, Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Rheumatology, Section of Inflammatory Disease Profiling, VU University Medical Center, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands


  1. Dennis G, Holweg CTJ, Kummerfeld SK, Choy DF, Setiadi F, Hackney JA, Haverty PM, Gilbert H, Lin WY, Diehl L, Fischer S, Song A, Musselman D, Klearman M, Gabay C, Kavanaugh A, Endres J, Fox DA, Martin F, Townsend MJ: Synovial phenotypes in rheumatoid arthritis correlate with response to biologic therapeutics. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014, 16: R90-10.1186/ar4555.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L, Weigelt B, Nuyten DS, Nobel AB, van’t Veer LJ, Perou CM: Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 560-569. 10.1056/NEJMoa052933.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lenz G, Wright G, Dave SS, Xiao W, Powell J, Zhao H, Xu W, Tan B, Goldschmidt N, Iqbal J, Vose J, Bast M, Fu K, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, Armitage JO, Kyle A, May L, Gascoyne RD, Connors JM, Troen G, Holte H, Kvaloy S, Dierickx D, Verhoef G, Delabie J, Smeland EB, Jares P, Martinez A, Lopez-Guillermo A: Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 2313-2323. 10.1056/NEJMoa0802885.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Raterman HG, Vosslamber S, de Ridder S, Nurmohamed MT, Lems WF, Boers M, van de Wiel M, Dijkmans BA, Verweij CL, Voskuyl AE: The interferon type I signature towards prediction of non-response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012, 14: R95-10.1186/ar3819.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim TH, Choi SJ, Lee YH, Song GG, Ji JD: Gene expression profile predicting the response to anti-TNF treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; analysis of GEO datasets. Joint Bone Spine. 2014, Feb 20 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  6. Toonen EJ, Gilissen C, Franke B, Kievit W, Eijsbouts AM, den Broeder AA, van Reijmersdal SV, Veltman JA, Scheffer H, Radstake TR, van Riel PL, Barrera P, Coenen MJ: Validation study of existing gene expression signatures for anti-TNF treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e33199-10.1371/journal.pone.0033199.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bugatti S, Manzo A, Bombardieri M, Vitolo B, Humby F, Kelly S, Montecucco C, Pitzalis C: Synovial tissue heterogeneity and peripheral blood biomarkers. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011, 13: 440-448. 10.1007/s11926-011-0201-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wijbrandts CA, Dijkgraaf MG, Kraan MC, Vinkenoog M, Smeets TJ, Dinant H, Vos K, Lems WF, Wolbink GJ, Sijpkens D, Dijkmans BA, Tak PP: The clinical response to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis is in part dependent on pretreatment tumour necrosis factor alpha expression in the synovium. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008, 67: 1139-1144. 10.1136/ard.2007.080440.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Klaasen R, Thurlings RM, Wijbrandts CA, van Kuijk AW, Baeten D, Gerlag DM, Tak PP: The relationship between synovial lymphocyte aggregates and the clinical response to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60: 3217-3224. 10.1002/art.24913.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© de Jong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.