Skip to content


Arthritis Research & Therapy

Open Access

Increased 30-day and 1-year mortality rates and lower coronary revascularisation rates following acute myocardial infarction in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease

  • Sharon Van Doornum1, 2Email author,
  • Megan Bohensky1,
  • Mark A Tacey1,
  • Caroline A Brand1,
  • Vijaya Sundararajan2 and
  • Ian P Wicks2
Arthritis Research & Therapy201517:38

Received: 3 July 2014

Accepted: 6 February 2015

Published: 27 February 2015



It is now well-recognised that patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD) have a predisposition to cardiovascular disease that results in increased morbidity and mortality. Following myocardial infarction (MI), patients with rheumatoid arthritis have been shown to have an increased case fatality rate; however, this has not been demonstrated in other forms of AIRD. The aim of this study was to compare case fatality rates following a first MI in patients with AIRD versus the general population. The secondary aim was to compare revascularisation treatment following MI in patients with AIRD versus the general population.


A retrospective cohort study using two population-based linked databases was undertaken. Cases of first MI from July 2001 to June 2007 were identified based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification, codes. Thirty-day and one-year mortality rates were calculated (all-cause and cardiovascular causes of death). Logistic regression models were fitted to calculate the odds of mortality by AIRD status with adjustment for relevant characteristics.


There were 79,390 individuals with a first MI, of whom 1,409 (1.8%) had AIRD. After adjusting for relevant covariates, the odds ratio (OR) for 30-day cardiovascular mortality in patients with AIRD was 1.44 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25 to 1.66), and the OR for 12-month cardiovascular mortality was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.51 to 1.94). The 90-day adjusted odds of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass graft were significantly lower in the AIRD group compared with controls (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.94, and OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.69, respectively).


We identified a higher risk-adjusted mortality rate for the majority of patients with AIRD at 30 days and 12 months after first MI. We also identified lower post-MI revascularisation rates in the AIRD group, suggesting there may be current gaps in cardiovascular treatment for patients with AIRD.


Myocardial InfarctionSystemic Lupus ErythematosusCoronary Artery Bypass GraftAnkylose SpondylitisMixed Connective Tissue Disease


Diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and systemic vasculitis have differing clinical presentations and immunopathogenic mechanisms, but they share the common feature of chronic systemic inflammation. These diseases, collectively referred to herein as autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD), also come with a predisposition to cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1]. Inflammation has been shown to be a critical aspect of the atherosclerotic process, influencing the development of endothelial dysfunction, plaque rupture and thrombosis [2]. Systemic inflammation in AIRD may drive the progression of underlying atherosclerotic disease, contributing to the increased CVD morbidity and mortality experienced by patients with AIRD [3-5].

A 2008 meta-analysis utilising data from 24 studies and 111,758 patients with RA (up to July 2005) reported a standardised mortality ratio from cardiovascular (CV) causes of 1.5 (95% CI: 1.39 to 1.61) [6]. This increased CV mortality can be partially explained by an increased incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) and other CVD [7-10]. However, we have demonstrated that patients with RA also have an increased case fatality rate following MI (adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 30-day mortality: 1.9 (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.7)) [11], a finding that has been replicated by others [9,12]. This increased case fatality rate may be partly explained by lower rates of post-MI treatment with acute revascularisation and/or cardioprotective drugs [13]. However, other possibilities include delays in the diagnosis of MI [14], the effect of concurrent medications (such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) [15,16], reduced physical activity and/or detrimental effects of systemic inflammation [17]. Patients with other forms of AIRD also have these potential risk factors and may also experience increased post-MI case fatality; however, this has not previously been investigated.

The primary aim of this study was to examine 30-day and 1-year mortality following a first acute MI in patients with AIRD versus the general population. The secondary aim was to compare revascularisation treatment (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG)) following MI in patients with AIRD versus the general population.


Data sources

Two Australian population-based datasets, the Victorian Linked Dataset (VLD) and the Western Australian Data Linkage System (WADLS), which cover approximately 35% of the Australian population, were utilised [18]. Both datasets include hospital and emergency presentation data from all private and public hospitals across the state, along with linked national death data [19,20]. An evaluation of the WADLS linkage has shown that the extensive probabilistic matching procedures based on patient names and other partial identifiers are 99.89% accurate [20].

These datasets contain deidentified demographic and clinical information on each episode of patient care, with clinical information coded in the format of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM), beginning 1 July 1998 and the ICD Ninth Revision, Canadian Modification (ICD-9-CM), prior to 1 July 1998 [21]. The Victorian Department of Health maintains data quality with an annual independent audit cycle that samples nearly 1% of public hospital discharges. In the most recent audit, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the hospital discharge coding for MI were 86% (95% CI: 80% to 93%) and 96% (95% CI: 92% to 100%), respectively, and for RA they were 91% (95% CI: 74% to 100%) and 77% (95% CI: 54% to 100%) [22]. The VLD provides place of residence information at the Australian census-derived Statistical Local Area (SLA) level, whereas the WADLS provides place of residence information at a postcode level.

Definition of index myocardial infarction and autoimmune rheumatic disease

All cases of MI from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2007 were identified based on the ICD-10-AM classifications (Additional file 1). An individual was considered to have experienced a first acute MI if she had a diagnosis of MI within this time period and no diagnosis of MI in the previous 5 years; that is, each dataset has records back to 1st July 1996 to provide a five-year ‘look-back’ period. A 5-year look-back period was chosen as this has been shown to exclude the vast majority of individuals who have experienced a prior MI, and it is likely that less than 5% of the remaining population have experienced an MI more than 5 years previously [23].

For the purposes of this study, AIRD included the following diagnoses: RA, SLE, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), enteropathic arthritis (EA), undifferentiated SpA, SSc, systemic necrotising vasculitis, Sjögren’s syndrome, polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM). Each of these conditions was considered to be present when the relevant ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-AM diagnostic codes (see Additional file 1) were recorded during the index MI admission or during any admission in the 3 years prior to the index MI. We also aggregated PsA, AS, EA and undifferentiated SpA into a SpA group. We chose a 3-year look-back period for identifying AIRD after comparing different look-back periods in a sensitivity analysis. We found that the 3-year look-back provided optimal ascertainment of AIRD while still providing sufficient years of data to address our aims [24]. Patients who had more than one AIRD condition coded during the look-back period were considered to have AIRD and were therefore counted only once in the primary analysis.



Thirty-day and one-year mortality rates were calculated from the admission date of the index MI episode to the date indicated in the death registry data. Deaths occurring outside the hospital based on death reports to the death registry were also considered. For the VLD, cause of death was provided in a text format. To identify CV deaths, we used a text string-searching algorithm for the causes of death, allowing for permutations of the following words: myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, pulmonary oedema, stroke, thromboembolism, and cardiac arrest. For the WADLS dataset, cause of death was provided in ICD-10-AM code format (Additional file 1).

Interventions in hospital

Procedure codes for PTCA and CABG were identified within the index MI episode or in any subsequent admission episode up to 90 days after the index MI to compare revascularisation rates for AIRD and non-AIRD patients (Additional file 1). As these procedures were not time- or date-stamped in the dataset, we were unable to identify the exact timing in relation to the MI event.

Other covariates

Covariates in the adjusted models included age, sex, socioeconomic status (SES), proximity to goods and services and comorbidities of interest (based on the Charlson comorbidity algorithm [25,26]) (Additional file 1). We also included smoking, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia in our analyses.

SES was indicated by the Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD), a measure included in the Socio-Economic Indexes of Areas (SEIFA) developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics [27,28]. The IRSD is derived from census survey data related to disadvantage, such as low income, low educational attainment, unemployment and dwellings without motor vehicles. This index is thought to be most closely aligned with low SES and has been shown to be a predictor of poorer health outcomes and greater hospital utilisation [29]. A dichotomous variable reflecting residential areas in the lowest quartile (those with the greatest disadvantage) compared with those in the top three quartiles was generated from the IRSD.

Access to goods and services, including health care services, was determined by using the Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA) measure [30]. This is an area-based measure based on each patient’s residential location. A dichotomized variable was generated to reflect those individuals whose place of residence was classified as ‘highly accessible’, indicating unrestricted access to goods and services, compared with those with restricted access.

Statistical analysis

After initial descriptive statistics and exploratory bivariate analysis, logistic regression models were fitted with AIRD status as the key exposure variable and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates (all-cause and CV) as the outcome. Covariate adjustments included age, sex, IRSD, ARIA and relevant comorbidities (see Figure 1 for complete list). χ2 analyses were used to compare intervention rates in patients with versus without AIRD. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the odds of receiving interventions by AIRD status after adjustment for age, sex, remoteness index, SES and comorbidities. Given the potential gain in efficiency of matching cases to controls, a sensitivity analysis was undertaken to explore this strategy. Non-AIRD controls were matched to AIRD cases on age and sex in a 5:1 ratio. All analyses were conducted using STATA statistical analysis software, version 12.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee. Individual patient consent was not required, as was determined by the ethics committee.
Figure 1

Mortality risk for patients who experienced a first myocardial infarction between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2007. *Spondyloarthritis group includes ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, enteropathic arthritis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis. Reference group is patients without autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD) or AIRD subgroup. For each AIRD subgroup, patients were excluded from the reference group if they had any other AIRD type. Adjusted for age, sex, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas, Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia high accessibility, individual Charlson comorbidities, smoking, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. ^95% CI, 95% confidence interval.


There were 79,390 individuals who experienced a first MI during the study period, of whom 1,409 (1.8%) had AIRD. The demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1 for the AIRD group overall and for the disease subgroups in Additional file 2. The patients with AIRD were older than those in the non-AIRD group (median (interquartile range) age: 77 years (68 to 83) versus 74 years (61 to 82)), more likely to be female (63.5% versus 39.1%) and less likely to be treated in public hospitals (63.7% versus 66.8%). Patients with AIRD were also more likely to have renal disease (20.2% versus 12.4%), pulmonary disease (11.4% versus 7.6%) and cerebrovascular accident (7.3% versus 5.4%). Patients with AIRD were less likely to have hypertension (41.1% versus 44.5%), a current history of smoking (11.9% versus 20.3%), hypercholesterolaemia (10.2% versus 16.4%) or cancer (4.7% versus 6.1%). The numbers of patients by AIRD subtype are reported in Table 2.
Table 1

Patient demographic and clinical factors a




Patients, n (%)

1,409 (1.8)

77,981 (98.2)

Age, median (IQR)

77 (68 to 83)

74 (61 to 82)

Female, n (%)

894 (63.5)

30,489 (39.1)

Indigenous,b n (%)

6 (2.0)

556 (3.7)

Married/de facto,b n (%)

137 (46.3)

9,007 (59.5)

High accessibility to services,c,d n (%)

1,232 (87.8)

67,550 (87.1)

Lowest quartile of SEIFA-IRSD, n (%)

190 (13.5)

11,102 (14.3)

Elective admission,e n (%)

213 (19.1)

10,923 (17.4)

Public hospital admission,e n (%)

709 (63.7)

41,965 (66.8)

Comorbidities at index admission, n (%)



579 (41.1)

34,687 (44.5)



437 (31.0)

22,202 (28.5)


Congestive heart failure

511 (36.3)

20,955 (26.9)



168 (11.9)

15,816 (20.3)



143 (10.2)

12,750 (16.4)



300 (21.3)

16,183 (20.7)


Renal disease

284 (20.2)

9,649 (12.4)


Pulmonary disease

161 (11.4)

5,927 (7.6)


Cerebrovascular accident

103 (7.3)

4,227 (5.4)



67 (4.7)

4,781 (6.1)



47 (3.3)

3119 (4.0)



51 (3.6)

2,262 (2.9)


Peripheral vascular disease

40 (2.8)

1,754 (2.3)



28 (2.0)

1,326 (1.7)


Peptic ulcer disease

34 (2.4)

871 (1.1)


Liver disease

16 (1.2)

443 (0.6)



1 (<0.1)

30 (<0.1)

aAIRD, Autoimmune rheumatic disease; IQR, Interquartile range; IRSD, Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage; SEIFA, Socio-Economic Indexes of Areas. bAvailable for Western Australia data only (n = 15,426). cBased on Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA) code 1, Major Cities, Highly Accessible. dMissing data for ARIA in Victoria data (n = 444). eAvailable for Victoria data only (n = 63,964).

Table 2

Number of autoimmune rheumatic disease conditions by subtype


Frequency, n


Rheumatoid arthritis



Polymyalgia rheumatica



Systemic necrotising vasculitis



Systemic lupus erythematosus



Systemic sclerosis



Ankylosing spondylitis



Psoriatic arthropathies









Mixed connective tissue disease



Sjögren’s syndrome



Total autoimmune rheumatic disease conditions, N



Mortality outcomes

The number of deaths in the AIRD and non-AIRD patients at 30 days and 12 months after the index MI, as well as the crude and adjusted ORs for mortality, are shown in Table 3. The 30-day all-cause mortality for AIRD and non-AIRD patients was 21.4% and 13.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, SES, ARIA and relevant comorbidities, the OR for 30-day all-cause mortality in the AIRD group was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.26 to 1.65). The 30-day CV mortality for AIRD and non-AIRD patients was 18.9% and 11.7%, respectively (P < 0.001), with a corresponding adjusted OR of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.25 to 1.66). At 12 months, the patients with AIRD had an all-cause mortality rate of 38.6%, and that of non-AIRD patients was 22.8% (P < 0.001), with an adjusted OR of 1.82 (95% CI: 1.61 to 2.05). The 12-month CV mortality rates were 32.9% versus 19.4% in AIRD and non-AIRD patients, respectively (P < 0.001), with an adjusted OR of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.51 to 1.94). Figure 1 shows the adjusted ORs for the AIRD group overall, along with adjusted ORs for the disease subgroups that comprise the AIRD population. The adjusted ORs for the disease subgroups are also presented in Table 4. The adjusted ORs obtained in the sensitivity analysis using matched data were similar and therefore are not reported separately. They are available in Additional file 3.
Table 3

Outcomes in patients with or without autoimmune rheumatic disease who experienced a first myocardial infarction between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2007 a


Non-AIRD (n = 77,981)

AIRD (n = 1,409)

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adjusted OR b (95% CI)

30-day mortality, all cause

10,452 (13.4)

301 (21.4)

1.76 (1.54 to 2.00)

1.44 (1.26 to 1.65)

30-day mortality, cardiovascular

9,105 (11.7)

266 (18.9)

1.76 (1.54 to 2.02)

1.44 (1.25 to 1.66)

12-month mortality, all cause

17,766 (22.8)

544 (38.6)

2.13 (1.91 to 2.38)

1.82 (1.61 to 2.05)

12-month mortality, cardiovascular

15,095 (19.4)

464 (32.9)

2.05 (1.83 to 2.29)

1.71 (1.51 to 1.94)

aAIRD, Autoimmune rheumatic disease; OR, Odds ratio. bAdjusted for age, sex, Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and comorbidities.

Table 4

Adjusted odds ratios for the autoimmune rheumatic disease group overall and disease subgroups a



30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio b )

12-month mortality (adjusted odds ratio b )

All causes


All causes


Autoimmune rheumatic diseases


1.44 (1.26 to 1.65)

1.44 (1.25 to 1.66)

1.82 (1.61 to 2.05)

1.71 (1.51 to 1.94)

Rheumatoid arthritis


1.50 (1.24 to 1.81)

1.51 (1.24 to 1.84)

2.00 (1.69 to 2.35)

1.85 (1.57 to 2.19)

Systemic lupus erythematosus


2.81 (1.71 to 4.62)

2.77 (1.65 to 4.64)

2.57 (1.60 to 4.13)

2.14 (1.30 to 3.51)

Psoriatic arthropathies


2.61 (1.14 to 5.97)

3.19 (1.40 to 7.27)

2.33 (1.09 to 4.97)

2.59 (1.19 to 5.63)

Ankylosing spondylitis


2.14 (1.13 to 4.08)

2.01 (1.02 to 3.95)

2.11 (1.16 to 3.82)

1.98 (1.08 to 3.66)



2.19 (1.30 to 3.67)

2.26 (1.32 to 3.86)

2.11 (1.31 to 3.39)

2.10 (1.29 to 3.42)

Systemic sclerosis


1.78 (0.95 to 3.33)

1.53 (0.78 to 3.03)

2.58 (1.48 to 4.48)

1.85 (1.03 to 3.34)

Systemic necrotising vasculitides


1.37 (0.95 to 1.98)

1.24 (0.84 to 1.84)

1.87 (1.35 to 2.60)

1.73 (1.25 to 2.41)

Sjögren’s syndrome


1.27 (0.42 to 3.86)

1.03 (0.30 to 3.57)

0.90 (0.32 to 2.53)

0.57 (0.16 to 1.97)

Polymyalgia rheumatica


0.96 (0.70 to 1.32)

1.01 (0.73 to 1.40)

1.25 (0.95 to 1.63)

1.38 (1.05 to 1.81)

Mixed connective tissue disease


0.78 (0.22 to 2.76)

0.95 (0.27 to 3.36)

2.96 (1.16 to 7.56)

2.06 (0.79 to 5.37)



0.25 (0.03 to 1.95)

0.32 (0.04 to 2.42)

2.40 (0.93 to 6.19)

2.45 (0.95 to 6.31)

aStatistically significant results in bold. bAdjusted for age, sex, Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and comorbidities. cSpondyloarthritis group includes ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, enteropathic arthritis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis.


Rates of PTCA within the index admission were significantly lower in the AIRD patient group than in the non-AIRD patient group (AIRD 13.5% versus non-AIRD 25.9%, P < 0.001, crude OR: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.46 to 0.62)) (Table 5). This difference persisted after adjustment for age, sex, ARIA, SEIFA and comorbidities (adjusted OR: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.94)). The intervention rates of CABG within the index admission were also significantly less in the AIRD patient group (2.5% versus 5.9%, P < 0.001, crude OR: 0.41 (95% CI: 0.29 to 0.57)), which persisted after adjustment (adjusted OR: 0.50 (95% CI: 0.35 to 0.70)). In those who did not undergo intervention during their index admission, intervention rates were higher in the non-AIRD patient group than in the AIRD patient group at 30 days and between 30 and 90 days, although this was not significant for CABG at 30 days. Following adjustment, there were no differences in intervention rate at either 30 or 90 days.
Table 5

Interventions in patients with or without autoimmune rheumatic disease who experienced a first myocardial infarction between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2007 a


Non-AIRD ( n= 77,981)

AIRD ( n= 1,409)

P -value

Crude odds ratio (95% CI)

P -value

Adjusted odds ratio b (95% CI)

P -value



Within index MI admission

17,622 (22.6)

190 (13.5)


0.53 (0.46 to 0.62)


0.80 (0.68 to 0.94)



Postdischarge and within 30 days of index MI episode

1,355 (2.2)

17 (1.4)


0.62 (0.36 to 0.99)


0.90 (0.56 to 1.44)



Between 30 and 90 days of index MI episode

1,192 (2.0)

14 (1.2)


0.57 (0.31 to 0.97)


0.95 (0.55 to 1.66)




Within index MI admission

4,592 (5.9)

35 (2.5)


0.41 (0.29 to 0.57)


0.50 (0.35 to 0.70)



Postdischarge and within 30 days of index MI episode

809 (1.1)

9 (0.7)


0.59 (0.27 to 1.13)


0.80 (0.43 to 1.51)



Between 30 and 90 days of index MI episode

1,350 (1.9)

9 (0.7)


0.35 (0.16 to 0.67)


0.59 (0.30 to 1.15)


aAIRD, Autoimmune rheumatic disease; CABG, Coronary artery bypass graft; CI, Confidence interval; MI, Myocardial infarction; PTCA, Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. bAdjusted for age, sex, Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and Charlson comorbidities.


To our knowledge, this is the largest study of case fatality rates following MI in patients with AIRD. Patients with AIRD experiencing a first MI had adjusted odds of death that were 1.5 times greater than that for patients without AIRD at 30 days (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.65) and nearly two times that of patients without AIRD at 12 months (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.61 to 2.05). Post-MI mortality was also significantly increased in most subgroups, including RA, SLE, PsA and AS (at 30 days and 12 months) and SSc, vasculitis, PMR and MCTD at 12 months. Sjögren’s syndrome was the only AIRD that did not demonstrate an association with mortality after MI. This may be due to the small number of patients (n = 22), as there is some evidence to suggest cardiac involvement in these patients [31]. Although dermatomyositis/polymyositis showed a positive association with mortality after MI at 12 months, the association was not significant. This also may be related to the small number of patients in this group (n = 25).

There have been relatively few studies of post-MI case fatality rates in patients with AIRD. Three studies in RA populations have all demonstrated increased case fatality rates following MI [9,11,12], whereas the results of two studies of in-hospital mortality after MI in lupus patients were inconsistent. In a comparison of outcomes after acute MI in 519 SLE patients and 214,771 controls in a California hospitalisation database, in-hospital mortality was not found to differ between the groups [32]. In contrast, a similar analysis using the 1993–2002 US Nationwide Inpatient Sample reported a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.65 (95% CI: 1.33 to 2.04) for in-hospital mortality in SLE [33].

We also identified disparities in intervention rates between AIRD and non-AIRD patients within the index admission. We recently reported similar findings in a study of 90 patients with RA drawn from three Australian hospitals. In that study, we identified lower rates of acute reperfusion in the RA group [13]. Similarly, in a retrospective cohort study in the United States, researchers reported lower rates of CABG (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.78) in a comparison of 1,206 age- and sex-matched patients with RA and controls [14]. In contrast to these findings, McCoy et al. reviewed medical records from 1979 to 2009 in the United States, including 77 patients with RA, and identified no differences in intervention rates, including thrombolytic therapy, PTCA and CABG [34]. Francis et al. conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,112,676 patients with MI in the United States and found that patients with RA (n = 13,029) were 38% (95% CI: 10% to 71%) more likely to receive thrombolysis and 27% (95% CI: 17% to 39%) more likely to receive PTCA [35]. As patients with RA comprised the majority of the cohort in our study (52%) and shared similar demographic characteristics with the aforementioned studies, the differences in treatment patterns may be related to practice variation in different geographical areas. We did not identify any studies in which treatment patterns in other (non-RA) AIRD populations were examined.

The patients with AIRD in this study tended to be older, were more likely to be female and/or unmarried and had significantly higher rates of certain comorbidities, including renal disease, pulmonary disease, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular accident and liver disease than non-AIRD patients. As some of these are known risk factors for mortality and morbidity following coronary intervention [36], clinicians may have been more reluctant to recommend invasive procedures for this patient group. As we did not have detailed clinical data on cardiac risk factors or clinician decision making, we are not able to determine whether these factors influenced intervention rates. Interestingly, patients with AIRD had significantly lower rates of certain CV risk factors compared with non-AIRD patients, including smoking, hypertension and dyslipidaemia. This finding is consistent with previous studies that have identified a clinical presentation of CVD in patients with RA that is different from traditional CVD presentation patterns, which may delay disease recognition [11,14] and/or treatment [13].

Current guidelines recommend CV screening for patients with RA and consideration of monitoring patients with AS and PsA [37]. Given the relationship between inflammatory processes and CVD, examining biomarkers of inflammation and the presence of AIRD conditions may be warranted as part of existing CVD risk prediction models. Identifying inflammatory markers has been shown to be effective for detecting non-AIRD patients at high risk of CV events. The findings of the JUPITER trial, in which researchers examined the use of rosuvastatin as primary prevention therapy to reduce CV events in people with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, support the use of inflammatory biomarkers in assessing CV risk [38]. A further study is underway to examine whether inhibiting inflammation with methotrexate is effective for reducing adverse CV outcomes [39]. Further research should consider whether anti-inflammatory treatments in patients with AIRD will contribute to reductions in CV risk and mortality.

A major strength of our study is that we utilised two population-based datasets with coverage of 35% of Australia’s population, including hospital admissions, emergency department presentations and deaths outside the hospital. However, we must also acknowledge several limitations. We utilized administrative datasets that are not designed primarily for research purposes. Clinical information in these types of data has been shown to have inaccuracies [40], and our estimates of CV risk factors may be inaccurate. This risk of error is unlikely to be differentially distributed between the groups, and therefore the risk of introduction of bias is low. There may be a bias towards coding more severe cases of AIRD, which would compromise the generalisability of our findings. Our finding of increased CV mortality across many of the AIRD subgroups is consistent with the hypothesis of systemic inflammation contributing to adverse CV outcomes; however, our data cannot address this specifically. The various disease subgroups have different aetiopathogenic mechanisms and treatment approaches that may increase CV risk via independent pathways. For instance, thrombosis may play a more important role in patients with SLE, whereas pulmonary hypertension and diastolic heart failure may be more relevant in patients with SSc. We found thrombolysis to be undercoded, as drug therapies are not routinely captured in these data, so thrombolysis rates could not be included in our analyses. We also used data from two different Australian states, which had different methods of coding some variables. A number of variables could not be analysed because of these differences, and our analysis of causes of death required different methodologies. However, comparisons between the two states revealed no significant differences in the distributions of causes of death. We chose a 5-year look-back period to identify a history of previous MI. Although this may have misclassified some subsequent MIs as the first MI, an individual who experienced MI during the study period and had a history of previous MI more than 5 years prior would have been likely to receive treatment comparable to that of individuals with a true first MI [41].


We have demonstrated increased 30-day and 12-month case fatality rates following an incident MI in patients with a range of AIRD conditions compared with the general population after adjustment for age, sex, SES, regional residence and significant comorbidities. We also identified lower rates of PTCA and CABG in the AIRD group within the index admission. Further studies are required to determine whether the management of patients with AIRD post-MI differs from that of non-AIRD patients. In future research, investigators should examine the use of inflammatory markers for identifying patients with AIRD who are at high risk and the influence of anti-inflammatory therapy on CV risk in patients with AIRD.



Autoimmune rheumatic disease


Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia


Ankylosing spondylitis


Coronary artery bypass graft


Confidence interval




Cardiovascular disease




Enteropathic arthritis


Hazard ratio


International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification


International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Ninth Revision, Canadian Modification


Interquartile range


Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage


Mixed connective tissue disease


Myocardial infarction


Odds ratio




Polymyalgia rheumatica


Psoriatic arthritis


Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty


Rheumatoid arthritis


Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas


Socioeconomic status


Statistical Local Area


Systemic lupus erythematosus




Systemic sclerosis


Victorian Linked Dataset


Western Australian Data Linkage System



The authors thank the Victorian Data Linkage Unit (VDLU) and the West Australian Data Linkage Service (WADLS) for providing the data used in this study and Dr Gene-Siew Ngian for assistance with preparation of the manuscript. This study was funded by grant APP1027249 from the National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC). The funding body had no input into the design, conduct or publication of this research. IPW is supported by a clinical practitioner fellowship from NHMRC (1023407) and an NHMRC program grant (1016647).

Authors’ Affiliations

Melbourne EpiCentre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia


  1. Hollan I, Meroni PL, Ahearn JM, Cohen Tervaert JW, Curran S, Goodyear CS, et al. Cardiovascular disease in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12:1004–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2129–38.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sattar N, McCarey DW, Capell H, McInnes IB. Explaining how “high-grade” systemic inflammation accelerates vascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation. 2003;108:2957–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Abou-Raya A, Abou-Raya S. Inflammation: a pivotal link between autoimmune diseases and atherosclerosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2006;5:331–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Frostegård J. Atherosclerosis in patients with autoimmune disorders. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:1776–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aviña-Zubieta JA, Choi HK, Sadatsafavi M, Etminan M, Esdaile JM, Lacaille D. Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1690–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Solomon DH, Karlson EW, Rimm EB, Cannuscio CC, Mandl LA, Manson JE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in women diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation. 2003;107:1303–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Symmons DP, Gabriel SE. Epidemiology of CVD in rheumatic disease, with a focus on RA and SLE. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7:399–408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Södergren A, Stegmayr B, Lundberg V, Ohman ML, Wållberg-Jonsson S. Increased incidence of and impaired prognosis after acute myocardial infarction among patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:263–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Watson DJ, Rhodes T, Guess HA. All-cause mortality and vascular events among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, or no arthritis in the UK General Practice Research Database. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1196–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Van Doornum S, Brand C, King B, Sundararajan V. Increased case fatality rates following a first acute cardiovascular event in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2061–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Douglas KM, Pace AV, Treharne GJ, Saratzis A, Nightingale P, Erb N, et al. Excess recurrent cardiac events in rheumatoid arthritis patients with acute coronary syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:348–53.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Doornum S, Brand C, Sundararajan V, Ajani AE, Wicks IP. Rheumatoid arthritis patients receive less frequent acute reperfusion and secondary prevention therapy after myocardial infarction compared with the general population. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R183.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maradit-Kremers H, Crowson CS, Nicola PJ, Ballman KV, Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ, et al. Increased unrecognized coronary heart disease and sudden deaths in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:402–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Wandel S, Hildebrand P, Tschannen B, Villiger PM, et al. Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:c7086.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Aviña-Zubieta JA, Abrahamowicz M, De Vera MA, Choi HK, Sayre EC, Rahman MM, et al. Immediate and past cumulative effects of oral glucocorticoids on the risk of acute myocardial infarction in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52:68–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Abbate A, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Brugaletta S, Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM. C-reactive protein and other inflammatory biomarkers as predictors of outcome following acute coronary syndromes. Semin Vasc Med. 2003;3:375–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population by age and sex, regions of Australia, 2010. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2011. Accessed 1 Mar 2015.Google Scholar
  19. The Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset. An overview. Melbourne, Australia: Acute Health Division, Victorian Government Department of Human Services; 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Holman CD, Bass AJ, Rouse IL, Hobbs MS. Population-based linkage of health records in Western Australia: development of a health services research linked database. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23:453–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. National Centre for Classification in Health. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM), Volume 5 ICD-10-AM Australian Coding Standards Second Edition 1 July 2000. Sydney: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney; 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Henderson T, Shepheard J, Sundararajan V. Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2006;44:1011–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Brameld KJ, Holman CD, Lawrence DM, Hobbs MS. Improved methods for estimating incidence from linked hospital morbidity data. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:617–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tacey M, Bohensky M, Van Doornum S. Methodology of determining an appropriate look-back period to identify autoimmune rheumatic disease in a study of post-myocardial infarction mortality [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:S330.Google Scholar
  25. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1288–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2001 census of population and housing. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2001.Google Scholar
  28. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA): Technical Paper. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2006.Google Scholar
  29. Brameld KJ, Holman CD. The use of end-quintile comparisons to identify under-servicing of the poor and over-servicing of the rich: a longitudinal study describing the effect of socioeconomic status on healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:61.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. National Centre for the Social Applications of GIS (GISCA). ARIA+: Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia Plus Version 2.0, Methodology. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide; 2004.Google Scholar
  31. Vassiliou VA, Moyssakis I, Boki KA, Moutsopoulos HM. Is the heart affected in primary Sjögren’s syndrome? An echocardiographic study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26:109–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ward MM. Outcomes of hospitalizations for myocardial infarctions and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:3170–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shah MA, Shah AM, Krishnan E. Poor outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:570–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McCoy SS, Crowson CS, Maradit-Kremers H, Therneau TM, Roger VL, Matteson EL, et al. Longterm outcomes and treatment after myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:605–10.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Francis ML, Varghese JJ, Mathew JM, Koneru S, Scaife SL, Zahnd WE. Outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2010;123:922–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, Edwards FH, Ewy GA, Gardner TJ, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation. 2004;110:e340–e437. A published erratum appears in. Circulation. 2005;111:2014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Peters MJ, Symmons DP, McCarey D, Dijkmans BA, Nicola P, Kvien TK, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:325–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto Jr AM, Kastelein JJ, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Everett BM, Pradhan AD, Solomon DH, Paynter N, MacFadyen J, Zaharris E, et al. Rationale and design of the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial: a test of the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis. Am Heart J. 2013;166:199–207.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Peabody JW, Luck J, Jain S, Bertenthal D, Glassman P. Assessing the accuracy of administrative data in health information systems. Med Care. 2004;42:1066–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kumar A, Cannon CP. Acute coronary syndromes: diagnosis and management, part II. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:1021–36.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar


© Van Doornum et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.