Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Matrix metalloproteinase-3 and the 7-joint ultrasound score in the assessment of disease activity and therapeutic efficacy in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
Arthritis Research & Therapy201719:250

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1449-z

  • Received: 16 August 2017
  • Accepted: 4 October 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) levels and articular ultrasound (US) scores in assessing disease activity and therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods

A total of 151 RA patients were enrolled, of whom 22 were treated with certolizumab pegol (Cimzia, CZP). The RA patients were divided into the following four subgroups according to their disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28): stable, mild activity, moderate activity, and high activity. Forty-three healthy controls were simultaneously studied. The serum MMP-3 levels and 7-joint US (US7) scores of all subjects were determined. The patients who were treated with CZP were subsequently followed for 6 months.

Results

The serum MMP-3 levels of all the RA patients were significantly higher than those of healthy controls, and those of patients with moderate and severe RA were significantly higher than those of patients with stable RA. The US7 scores of patients with severe RA were significantly higher than those of patients in other groups. Using the DAS28 as a reference standard, the corresponding cutoff value of MMP-3 was 70.5 ng/ml. After CZP treatment, the MMP-3 levels and US7 scores were significantly decreased at week 2, and the mean changes in US7 scores at weeks 12 and 24 were significantly higher in both groups with American College of Rheumatology 50% positive response (ACR50) and ACR 70% positive response (ACR70) than in the negative groups.

Conclusion

Serum MMP-3 and the US7 scores could both effectively reflect disease activity and therapeutic responses in patients with moderate to severe RA.

Trial registration

CTR20140405 (RA0044), CTR20140405: A phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Randomized, 24-Week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol as Additional Medication to Methotrexate in Chinese Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Incomplete Response to Methotrexate, Registered on 13 June 2014.

CTR20140412 (RA0078), CTR20140412: A phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label Extension Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol as Additional Medication to Methotrexate in Chinese Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Participated in RA0044, Registered on 02 July 2014.

Keywords

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Matrix metalloproteinase-3
  • Articular ultrasonography

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, serious systemic autoimmune disease that is primarily characterized by multi-joint synovitis [1]. Therefore, comprehensive approaches to assessing joint damage in patients with RA are pivotal for the early diagnosis and treatment of RA in clinical settings [2]. Currently, approaches to the clinical assessment of RA disease activity, such as the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) require complicated algorithms with multiple parameters, including the number of swollen and tender joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score, etc. Moreover, the 28-joint ultrasound (US28) score and the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and clinical disease activity index (CDAI) considers 28 joints, which is simple but could be time-consuming. Even so, these parameters can only indirectly reflect damage to cartilage and bone in RA. Thus, accurate and simple methods are urgently needed to assess disease activity in patients with RA.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which contain the Zn2+ ion, are the most important proteases participating in extracellular matrix degradation [3]. In recent years, it has been reported that inflammatory cytokines can induce the secretion of MMP-1 and MMP-3, which are important factors in the degradation of cartilage and bone matrix [4]. Houseman et al. found that MMP-3 and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies were strongly predictive of joint damage in patients with RA [5]. In addition, it was previously reported that MMP-3 levels in the synovium of patients with RA were significantly elevated; moreover, the gene that encodes MMP-3 was found to be overexpressed in the synovium [6]. These data suggest that MMP-3 is a biomarker of cartilage degeneration. However, few studies have reported that MMP-3 is an early predictor of disease improvement and therapeutic response.

Articular ultrasound has become an important diagnostic technique for RA owing to its versatile nature of being non-invasive, non-radiation, economic, portable, and providing real-time dynamic monitoring, etc. Articular ultrasound is superior to traditional radiography and clinical examination and is equivalent to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [7]. Gray-scale ultrasound can be used to observe fluid, the synovium, tendons, periarticular soft tissue, cartilage, and bone erosion dynamically in real time. A previous study suggested that power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) is a more sensitive method for revealing disease activity than other clinical assessments [8]. At present, there is no standard for accurate evaluation of RA using ultrasound. Currently, the most simple and convenient clinical system is the 7-joint ultrasound (US7) score, which was proposed by Backhau et al. [9]. The US7 scoring system reflects the evaluation of soft tissue lesions and bone destructive changes in a set of joints. Hammer et al. analyzed the value of evaluating different numbers of joints using the US7, US12, US28, US44, and US78 in evaluating RA, finding that the US7 and US78 scores had similar sensitivity [10].

MMP-3 is a potential serum marker of cartilage degradation in RA and is related to disease activity. However, MMP-3 has rarely been used in the classification of RA activity. Ultrasound is a simple and practical approach that can directly reflect the progress of patients with RA as identified on clinical imaging. Therefore, this study attempts, for the first time, to combine the two approaches in the evaluation of disease activity and treatment efficacy in different categories of severity of RA. The ultimate aim of this work is to identify a more accurate and simpler method of monitoring disease activity and estimating treatment efficacy according to disease severity to guide clinical decisions in patients with RA.

Methods

Study subjects

A total of 151 patients with RA were recruited from the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital (Shanghai, China) from December 2014 to June 2015. All study subjects with RA met the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for RA.

Clinical information was recorded for all patients, including disease duration, the number of joints with tenderness upon touching and swelling of the joints. According to the DAS28, a component of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria, the patients were separated into four subgroups: stable or remissive, mild (2.6 ≤ DAS28 < 3.2), moderate (3.2 ≤ DAS28 < 5.1), and highly active (DAS28 ≥ 5.1). Of the 151 patients with RA, 22 had received certolizumab-pegol (Cimzia, CZP) and methotrexate treatment, with the following dosing parameters: biweekly intravenous injections of 400 mg CZP for the first 6 weeks and 200 mg biweekly for the subsequent 18 weeks, in combination with methotrexate (10 mg once per week during the course of treatment). This has been proven to effectively treat moderate to severe RA [11]. Prednisone was discontinued at least 1 month before the study start.

In addition, 43 healthy subjects with no immune system diseases, liver or kidney diseases, infections, or cancers were included as controls from the Medical Examination Center of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital.

All the recruited subjects who participated in the study had provided informed consent. The study protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital.

Specimen collection

Serum was collected from centrifuged venous blood (5 ml) from patients and healthy volunteers in the fasting state. The specimens were centrifuged within 2 hours and preserved at − 20 °C for subsequent testing.

Determination of serum levels of anti-CCP antibodies, MMP-3, and other markers

The level of anti-CCP antibodies was determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and MMP-3 levels were tested by immunoturbidimetry, following the assay kit instructions (Shanghai Huachen Reagent Co., Shanghai, China). The examination was conducted using automatic biochemical analyzers. The ESR was detected using the Westergren method (mm/h), and the level of CRP was detected using automatic immune rate nephelometry (mg/L).

Ultrasound assessment

Ultrasound assessments of seven articular regions were conducted by two experienced sonographers using a Philips HD9 color Doppler ultrasound device equipped with a high-frequency linear array probe (5–12 MHz) in a double-blind fashion. These assessments were performed within 4 hours of the clinical tests. The procedure standards were in accordance with the guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasonography, which were jointly developed by the American Institute of Ultrasound Medicine (AIUM) and American College of Radiology. The seven articular regions were the dominant wrist, the second and third metacarpophalangeal (MCP2 and MCP3) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP2 and PIP3) joints, and the second and fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP2 and MTP5) joints. Three characteristics of each joint are assessed, namely, synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bone erosion. Synovitis was rated from 0 to 3, corresponding to none, mild, moderate, and severe. Tenosynovitis and bone erosion were classified as positive or negative and scored 1 or 0, accordingly. If synovitis was detected, additional observations were made of the blood flow signal using color Doppler [12]. The pulse repetition frequency (PRF) was tuned to the minimum frequency range (0.7–1.0 kHz). The Doppler signal was classified into the three following categories: (1) a few spots of the blood flow signal; (2) a continuous flow signal with an area <50% of the joint cavity; and (3) blood flow in more than 50% of the joint cavity. The synovitis, tenosynovitis, bone erosion scores, and respective flow signals were recorded for seven joints, with a maximum score of 94.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 6.0c software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Normally distributed data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation \( \left(\overline{\mathrm{x}}\pm \mathrm{S}\right) \), and non-normally distributed data are presented as the mean (P25, P75). The Wilcoxon test was used for inter-group comparisons. The validity of MMP-3, US7 and their combination (MMP-3 + US7) in classifying the disease activity of RA were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The relationship between the various clinical and laboratory parameters was tested using Spearman correlation analysis. A two-sided p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General characteristics of participants

There were 151 patients with RA, including 135 women and 16 men, with ages from 21 to 72 years (mean 47.82 ± 13.15 years). The healthy controls were 23 women and 20 men, with ages from 24 to 66 years (mean 40.28 ± 19.12 years) (Table 1). Of the 22 patients with RA receiving CZP treatment, there were 19 women and 3 men, with ages from 25 to 57 years (mean 44 ± 10.64 years).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics and the selected laboratory values for 151 patients with RA

 

Stable RA

Mild RA

Moderate RA

Severe RA

RA

Control

33 patients

32 patients

35 patients

51 patients

151 patients

43 patients

Agea

48.23 ± 10.28

44.12 ± 12.01

45.18 ± 11.01

49.14 ± 12.51

47.82 ± 13.15

40.28 ± 19.12

Sex (male/female)

5/28

4/28

4/30

3/49

16/135

20/23

Disease duration [20]b

6 (3 ~ 10)

5 (2 ~ 10)

3 (0 ~ 5)

10 (1 ~ 11)**

7(1 ~ 11)

 

Number of joints with tendernessb

1 (0 ~ 10)

2 (0 ~ 10)

3 (0 ~ 9)

8 (6 ~ 14)***

5(2 ~ 13)

Number of joints with swellingb

0 (0 ~ 4)

1 (0 ~ 4)

3 (0 ~ 4)**

3 (0 ~ 7)

2 (0 ~ 6)

DAS28b

2.13 (1.83 ~ 2.32)

2.98 (2.81 ~ 3.04)**

4.12 (3.61 ~ 4.58)**

6.21 (5.44 ~ 6.71)***

3.82 (2.81 ~ 5.635)

ESRb

18.04 (10.21 ~ 40.27)

27.05 (14.25 ~ 45.75)**

39.10 (23.21 ~ 51.52)**

45.22 (33.53 ~ 58.51)***

37.00 (21.50 ~ 52.00)

HAQb

5.05 (2.21 ~ 10.32)

7.04 (4.25 ~ 19.98)**

12.05 (6.03 ~ 19.50)**

20.03 (12.04 ~ 27.12)***

12.04 (5.40 ~ 20.12)

Anti-CCPb

185.04 (33.20 ~ 678.41)

209.90 (81.62 ~ 957.71)

195.71 (38.27 ~ 178.12)

192.70 (16.48 ~ 294.12)

108.7 (34.7 ~ 607.3)

US7b

0.8 (0.3 ~ 2.4)

2.2 (0.8 ~ 5.5)

3.2 (0.9 ~ 6.2)

7.8 (2.6 ~ 11.2) ***

4.0 (0.5 ~ 9.7)

MMP3b

33.40 (22.60 ~ 678.42)

54.25 (33.23 ~ 81.60)

105.10 (61.70 ~ 172.71)******

363.11 (161.52 ~ 475.92)******

99.3 (23.65 ~ 415.83) ***

35.20 (25.90 ~ 48.90)

RA rheumatoid arthritis, CCP cyclic citrullinated peptide, CRP C-reactive protein, DAS28 disease activity score in 28 joints, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, HAQ health assessment questionnaire, MMP-3 matrix metalloproteinase-3, US7 the 7-joint ultrasound score

aThe data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

bThe data are presented as the median and interquartile range

Compared with patients with stable RA, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05; compared with the healthy controls, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05.

Serum MMP-3 levels, articular US7 scores, and other indexes of patients with RA and controls

The ESR, DAS28, and HAQ in each group of patients with active RA were significantly higher than those in patients with stable RA (p < 0.01 or p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the levels of anti-CCP antibodies between the analyzed groups (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

The serum MMP-3 levels in all patients with RA were significantly higher than those in the healthy controls (p < 0.001). The MMP-3 levels in patients with moderate and severe RA were both significantly higher than those in patients with stable RA (all p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the levels of this marker between mild patients with RA and those with stable RA or controls (p > 0.05, Fig. 1a and Table 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) levels (a) and 7-joint ultrasound (US7) scores (b) in the different groups of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). a MMP-3 in patients with RA with moderate and severe disease activity were significantly higher than in patients with stable RA (105.10 vs 33.40, p < 0.001; 363.11 vs 33.40, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the group with mild RA and the group with stable RA or the normal control group (54.25 vs 33.40, p > 0.05; 54.25 vs 35.20, p > 0.05). b The US7 scores in patients with severe active RA were significantly higher than those in patients in the stable, mild, and moderate RA groups (7.8 vs 0.8 p < 0.001; 7.8 vs 2.2 p < 0.05; 7.8 vs 3.2 p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between patients with mild or moderate RA activity and those with stable activity (p > 0.05)

The US7 scores in patients with severe active RA were significantly higher than those in patients with stable, mild, and moderate RA (p < 0.001, p < 0.05 and p < 0.05, respectively). However, no significant differences in the US7 score were observed between the mild or moderate RA group and the stable RA group (Fig. 1b).

Correlations between MMP-3 and other biomarkers

The US7 score was positively correlated with MMP-3 in patients with RA (r = 0.566, p < 0.001, Table 2). Using the DAS28 as the reference standard, the corresponding cutoff value in the ROC curve for MMP-3 was 70.5 ng/ml (area under the curve = 0.8538, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2). The sensitivity and specificity of US7 combined with MMP-3 were 58.8% and 92.6%, respectively. The difference in the US7 scores between MMP-3-negative and MMP-3-positive patients was significant (1.463 ± 0.3085 vs 6.457 ± 0.5295, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2).
Table 2

Correlations between MMP-3 or US7 scores and other variables

 

US7

CCP

ESR

DAS28

HAQ

Synovitis

Tenosynovitis

Bone erosion

MMP-3

0.586***

−0.239**

0.576***

0.513***

0.471***

0.525***

0.348***

0.339**

US7

 

−0.174

0.384***

0.487***

0.434***

0.959***

0.492***

0.456***

Anti-CCP

  

−0.069

−0.216*

−0.106

−0.160

−0.126

−0.188

ESR

   

0.495***

0.310**

0.376***

0.238

0.246

DAS28

    

0.546***

0.445***

0.312*

0.282

HAQ

     

0.408***

0.277*

0.157

Synovitis

      

0.394**

0.278

Tenosynovitis

       

0.363**

CCP cyclic citrullinated peptide, CRP C-reactive protein, DAS28 disease activity score in 28 joints, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, HAQ health assessment questionnaire, MMP-3 matrix metalloproteinase-3, US7 7-joint ultrasound score

***p < 0.001,**p < 0.01,*p < 0.05

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) for classification of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Setting the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) as the reference standard, the sensitivity of MMP-3 in classifying the disease activity of RA was determined using a ROC curve. The corresponding cutoff value in the ROC curve of MMP-3 is 70.5 ng/ml (area under the curve 0.8538, p < 0.0001)

MMP-3 and US7 in evaluating the efficacy of CZP treatment

The MMP-3 levels and US7 scores in the 22 patients with RA who were treated with CZP were significantly decreased at week 2 compared with baseline levels (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively; Table 3 and Fig. 3).
Table 3

MMP-3, US7 scores, and clinical characteristics of 22 patients with RA being treated with CZP

 

Weeks (W) after treatment

W0

W2

W12

W24

DAS28

6.17 ± 0.86

4.365 ± 1.12***

3.62 ± 1.32***

3.43 ± 1.26***

US7

8.7 ± 8.61

3.1 ± 3.09**

2.35 ± 2.85**

2.1 ± 2.51**

MMP-3

214.8 ± 160.4

94.11 ± 74.96***

98.86 ± 114.7***

122.7 ± 167.7*

CRP

12.40 ± 15.01

6.05 ± 7.338

5.45 ± 8.27**

6.5 ± 15.22

Anti-CCP

363.0 ± 385.6

386.7 ± 454.2

339 ± 374.2

300.3 ± 323.7

HAQ

22.2 ± 14.7

13.85 ± 10.64***

12.5 ± 9.95**

12.9 ± 10.7***

ESR

60.35 ± 22.78

38.95 ± 16.96***

29.75 ± 14.59***

37.0 ± 21.8***

Synovitis

3.70 ± 3.511

2.35 ± 2.98*

2.25 ± 2.845*

1.3 ± 2.658**

Synovial blood flow

1.85 ± 2.368

0.85 ± 1.63*

0.65 ± 1.424*

0.4 ± 0.821**

Tenosynovitis

0.25 ± 0.71

0.05 ± 0.22

0.05 ± 0.23

0

Tenosynovial blood flow

0.25 ± 0.71

0

0

0

Bone erosion

0.65 ± 1.13

0.5 ± 1.0

0.45 ± 0.99

0.3 ± 0.57

RA rheumatoid arthritis, CZP certolizumab pegol, CCP cyclic citrullinated peptide, CRP C-reactive protein, DAS28 disease activity score in 28 joints, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, HAQ health assessment questionnaire, MMP-3 matrix metalloproteinase-3, US7 7-joint ultrasound score

Compared with the baseline level (W0), ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) and 7-joint ultrasound (US7) scores in 22 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP). US7 scores were compared between the MMP-3-positive and the MMP-3-negative groups. Patients’ MMP-3 levels and US7 scores were significantly decreased at week 2 compared with baseline levels

The mean changes from baseline in the US7 scores (ΔUS7) at both week 12 and week 24 were significantly greater in the ACR 50% response (ACR50) and ACR70 groups (i.e., ACR50-positive and ACR70-positive) than in patients who did not achieve these responses (ACR50-negative and ACR70-negative) (all p < 0.001, Table 4). The mean changes in ΔMMP-3 from baseline were significantly greater in both the ACR50-positive and ACR70-positive groups than those in the negative response groups at week 24 (all p < 0.01, Table 4).
Table 4

The mean changes in clinical indicators from baseline at weeks 12 and 24 in both ACR50 and ACR70 negative groups and ACR50 and ACR70 positive groups

 

ACR50

ACR70

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

ΔDAS28

W12

2.304 ± 1.626

2.688 ± 0.996

2.583 ± 1.257

2.51 ± 1.255

W24

2.536 ± 1.598

2.857 ± 0.962

2.591 ± 1.314

2.898 ± 1.099

ΔMMP-3

W12

84.914 ± 32.938

122.599 ± 149.654

102.92 ± 66.121

133.385 ± 182.232

W24

69.139 ± 33.066

124.365 ± 107.828**

76.244 ± 49.253

127.828 ± 220.685**

ΔUS7

W12

1.143 ± 1.215

9.154 ± 8.061***

1.75 ± 1.658

13.25 ± 7.704***

W24

0.857 ± 1.676

9.692 ± 7.836***

1.5 ± 2.224

11.7 ± 7.775***

ΔCRP

W12

3.571 ± 4.315

8.769 ± 10.109

6.250 ± 7.689

8.000 ± 10.664

W24

3.00 ± 5.888

7.385 ± 11.507

5.600 ± 9.582

6.100 ± 16.032

ΔAnti-CCP

W12

68.01 ± 166.238

69.32 ± 149.09

58.1 ± 143.488

72.145 ± 108.321

W24

75.47 ± 158.87

77.35 ± 127.76

69.68 ± 122.58

77.65 ± 148.53

ΔHAQ

W12

8.429 ± 8.904

10.385 ± 13.556

7.33 ± 8.283

13.250 ± 15.926

W24

9.429 ± 9.502

9.231 ± 8.757

8.0 ± 9.534

10.6 ± 8.235

ΔESR

W12

28.714 ± 22.134

31.615 ± 21.964

35.41 ± 20.291

32.75 ± 21.446

W24

25.429 ± 19.68

22.231 ± 28.94

27.8 ± 20.065

18.90 ± 30.552

The Δ symbol represents changes from baseline

ACR50 American College of Rheumatology 50% response, ACR70 ACR 70% response, CCP cyclic citrullinated peptide, CRP C-reactive protein, DAS28 disease activity score in 28 joints, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, HAQ health assessment questionnaire, MMP-3 matrix metalloproteinase-3, US7 7-joint ultrasound score

Compared with the negative group, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05

Discussion

RA is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease. Accurate and simple methods are urgently needed to assess both RA disease activity and treatment efficacy in patients with RA. This study was performed to determine the role of MMP-3 measurements and the US7 score in the assessment of RA activity. The results indicate the effectiveness of the combined evaluation of serum MMP-3 and the US7 score in the assessment of RA activity and therapeutic efficacy in patients with RA.

The current study found that MMP-3 was significantly increased in patients with RA, especially among patients with moderate to severe disease activity. Moreover, the US7 scores in severe active RA were significantly higher than in stable, mild, and moderate RA. These aroused our interest in whether MMP-3 was associated with US7 scores in the evaluation of RA. The results of Spearman correlation analysis indicated that MMP-3 and US7 are strongly correlated (r = 0.586, p < 0.001). This result is consistent with the study of Gora et al., who reported correlation between US28 and MMP-3 [13]. Therefore, MMP-3 and US7 were good assessment biomarkers of moderate to severe RA. We also found that correlation between MMP-3 and the US7 synovitis score was much stronger than for tendon sheath synovitis and bone destruction scores. These data are supported by clinical observations that MMP-3 is highly suggestive of joint inflammation in clinical practice and the level of it was elevated both in the serum and the synovial fluid of patients with RA and other forms of arthritis [14, 15]. This may be attributed to the correlation between serum MMP-3 and inflammatory biomarkers and imaging changes [16, 17], while patients with RA with mild or stable disease and minimal synovial inflammation are usually free from massive cartilage and bone destruction [18]. In addition, ROC curve analysis identified a 70.5 ng/ml cutoff value for MMP-3 for diagnosis of severe RA, and this performed well in detecting joint involvement (area under the curve 0.8538, p < 0.0001). Using cutoff values as the classification criteria, we found that the US7 scores in the MMP-3-positive group were much higher than those in the MMP-3-negative group. Thus, serum MMP-3 could be used as a pre-evaluation standard to assist or reduce the burden on medical staff.

In addition, to verify the effect of combined evaluation of MMP-3 and US7 in patients with moderate to severe RA treated with methotrexate and CZP, the disease activity and outcome measure in the clinical follow up of patients with RA was assessed. Patients’ MMP-3 levels and US7 scores decreased significantly from baseline in the second week. In addition, the downward trends in MMP-3 and US7 scores were correlated, suggesting that MMP-3 and articular ultrasound can sensitively and stably detect a therapeutic response in clinical practice. This result further suggests that both markers can be used as indices of efficacy. Moreover, no significant ultrasound-detected changes were associated with minor joint inflammation in patients with stable, mild activity. However, positive US7 scores were observed in the patients with stable and mild RA, suggesting that clinically stable patients still suffer from synovial hyperplasia and bone damage. This result is consistent with a recent study by Nguyen et al., who suggest that ultrasound can detect even residual synovitis in patients with RA in clinical remission, a finding that was predictive of RA recurrence and progression [19].

There were some limitations in this study: the follow-up sample size was quite small, rendering it difficult to stratify the sample into groups. In addition, the frequency of the ultrasonic probe, which was 5–12 MHz, and the fact that the US7 score is based on only seven articular areas, means the large joints were excluded. The US7 score can also be influenced by subjective factors. Hence, to verify the role of MMP-3 measurement and the US7 score in assessing disease activity in moderate to severe RA, it will be imperative to repeat these analyses with a higher-frequency probe and to expand the sample size.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study confirmed that serum levels of MMP-3 and the US7 score are strongly correlated and can effectively reflect disease activity in patients with moderate to severe RA. After treatment with CZP, MMP-3 and the US7 score were able to sensitively and stably detect therapeutic responses in patients with moderate to severe RA. Therefore, the combination of serum MMP-3 measurements and the US7 score could be a simple and practical assessment approach for detection of RA disease activity and therapeutic efficacy in the clinical setting. Moreover, the MMP-3 value 70.5 ng/ml may be considered a pre-assessment indicator of severe RA.

Abbreviations

ACR: 

American College Rheumatology

AIUM: 

American Institute of Ultrasound Medicine

Anti-CCP: 

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CZP: 

Certolizumab pegol

DAS28: 

Disease activity score in 28 joints

ESR: 

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

HAQ: 

Health assessment questionnaire

MCP: 

Metacarpophalangeal joints

MMP: 

Matrix metalloproteinase

PDUS: 

power Doppler ultrasound

PIP: 

Proximal interphalangeal joints

PRF: 

Pulse repetition frequency

RA: 

Rheumatoid arthritis

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristic

US7: 

The 7-joint ultrasound score

VAS: 

Visual analogue scale

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating subjects who provided blood samples and clinical information necessary for this study.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 81273283.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

All authors, LZ, GW, XL, LC, JS, and HX made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and contributed to analysis and interpretation of data; all authors were involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the recruited subjects who participated in the study had provided informed consent. The study protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital (Reference number: 2014 (Ethics)-34; 2014(Ethics)-35).

Consent for publication

All authors gave final approval of the version to be published. We have obtained consent to publish from all participants to report individual patient data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China

References

  1. Loveday DT, Jackson GE, Geary NP. The rheumatoid foot and ankle: current evidence. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;18(18):94–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Finckh A, Escher M, Liang MH, Bansback N. Preventive treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: issues regarding patient preferences. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2016;18(8):51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoshima M, Ito T, Tokura Y. Erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp arising concomitantly with elevation of serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. J Dermatol. 2015;42(5):540–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hiura K, Iwaki-Egawa S, Kawashima T, Fujisawa S, Takeda T, Komori H, Watanabe Y. The diagnostic utility of matrix metalloproteinase-3 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for predicting rheumatoid arthritis in anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody-negative patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(9):2309–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Houseman M, Potter C, Marshall N, Lakey R, Cawston T, Griffiths I, Young-Min S, Isaacs JD. Baseline serum MMP-3 levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are still independently predictive of radiographic progression in a longitudinal observational cohort at 8 years follow up. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(1):R30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Zeisel MB, Druet VA, Wachsmann D, Sibilia J. MMP-3 expression and release by rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes induced with a bacterial ligand of integrin alpha5beta1. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(1):R118–126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mandl P, Kurucz R, Niedermayer D, Balint PV, Smolen JS. Contributions of ultrasound beyond clinical data in assessing inflammatory disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: current insights and future prospects. Rheumatology. 2014;53(12):2136–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ben Abdelghani K, Miladi S, Souabni L, Kassab S, Chekili S, Laatar A, Zakraoui L. Role of ultrasound in assessing remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96(1):3–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus TM, Hartung W, Sattler H, Albrecht K, Kaufmann J, Becker K, et al. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(9):1194–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammer HB, Kvien TK. Comparisons of 7- to 78-joint ultrasonography scores: all different joint combinations show equal response to adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(3):R78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Markatseli TE, Papagoras C, Nikoli A, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Certolizumab for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(3):415–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Backhaus TM, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Hartung W, Sattler H, Iking-Konert C, Burmester GR, Schmidt WA, Backhaus M. The US7 score is sensitive to change in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 12 months of therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(7):1163–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorai M, Ogasawara M, Matsuki Y, Yamada Y, Murayama G, Sugisaki N, Nemoto T, Ando S, Minowa K, Kon T, et al. Weighting with the Lansbury articular index improves the correlation of ultrasound score with serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 level in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24(6):915–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunnane G, Fitzgerald O, Beeton C, Cawston TE, Bresnihan B. Early joint erosions and serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 1, matrix metalloproteinase 3, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(10):2263–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Green MJ, Gough AK, Devlin J, Smith J, Astin P, Taylor D, Emery P. Serum MMP-3 and MMP-1 and progression of joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2003;42(1):83–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tchetverikov I, Lohmander LS, Verzijl N, Huizinga TW, TeKoppele JM, Hanemaaijer R, DeGroot J. MMP protein and activity levels in synovial fluid from patients with joint injury, inflammatory arthritis, and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(5):694–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Araki Y, Wada TT, Aizaki Y, Sato K, Yokota K, Fujimoto K, Kim YT, Oda H, Kurokawa R, Mimura T. Histone methylation and STAT-3 differentially regulate Interleukin-6-Induced matrix metalloproteinase gene activation in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(5):1111-23.Google Scholar
  18. Ma JD, Zhou JJ, Zheng DH, Chen LF, Mo YQ, Wei XN, Yang LJ, Dai L. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 as a noninvasive biomarker of histological synovitis for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:179284.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Nguyen H, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gandjbakhch F, Constantin A, Foltz V, Cantagrel A. Prevalence of ultrasound-detected residual synovitis and risk of relapse and structural progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology. 2014;53(11):2110–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ahmed A, Hollan I, Curran SA, Kitson SM, Riggio MP, Mikkelsen K, Almdahl SM, Aukrust P, McInnes IB, Goodyear CS. Brief Report: Proatherogenic cytokine microenvironment in the aortic adventitia of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(6):1361-66.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement