- Correction
- Open access
- Published:
Correction: Patient-reported outcomes of upadacitinib versus abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 12- and 24-week results of a phase 3 trial
Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 24, Article number: 248 (2022)
The Original Article was published on 24 June 2022
Correction: Arthritis Res Ther 24, 155 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02813-x
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Additional files 1 and 2 as the axes on the supplemental figures were unclear. The additional files were updated.
The original article [1] has been updated.
Reference
Bergman M, Tundia N, Martin N, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of upadacitinib versus abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 12- and 24-week results of a phase 3 trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022;24:155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02813-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Figure S1.
Proportion of Patients Reporting PRO Scores ≥ Normative Values at Baseline and weeks 12 and 24. aABA IV at day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 (<60 kg: 500 mg; 60–100 kg: 750 mg; >100 kg: 1,000 mg). ABA, abatacept; BL, baseline; EQ-5D-5L (index score), EQ-5D 5-Level; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; IV, intravenous; LDA, low disease activity; MCS, Mental Component Summary; PCS, Physical Component Summary; PRO, patient-reported outcome; PtGA, Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; UPA, upadacitinib. *P<0.05 for UPA vs ABA. †P=0.05 for UPA vs ABA.
Additional file 2: Figure S2.
Proportion of Patients Reporting SF-36 Scores ≥ Normative Values at Baseline and weeks 12 and 24. aABA IV at day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 (<60 kg: 500 mg; 60–100 kg: 750 mg; >100 kg: 1,000 mg). ABA, abatacept; BL, baseline; BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; IV, intravenous; MH, mental health; PF, physical functioning; RE, role emotional; RP, role physical; SF, social functioning; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; UPA, upadacitinib; VT, vitality. *P<0.05 for UPA vs ABA.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Bergman, M., Tundia, N., Martin, N. et al. Correction: Patient-reported outcomes of upadacitinib versus abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 12- and 24-week results of a phase 3 trial. Arthritis Res Ther 24, 248 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02940-5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02940-5