Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effect of targeted rheumatoid arthritis therapeutics on systemic inflammation and anemia: analysis of data from the CorEvitas RA registry

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 24, Article number: 276 (2022) Cite this article

A Research to this article was published on 25 August 2022

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) on hemoglobin (Hb) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in adults enrolled in CorEvitas (formerly Corrona), a large US rheumatoid arthritis (RA) registry.

Methods

Patients who initiated TNFi, IL-6Ri, or JAKi treatment during or after January 2010, had Hb and CRP measurements at baseline and 6-month follow-up (± 3 months) and had continued therapy at least until that follow-up, through March 2020, were included in the analysis. Changes in Hb and CRP were assessed at month 6. Abnormal Hb was defined as < 12 g/dL (women) or < 13 g/dL (men); abnormal CRP was ≥ 0.8 mg/dL. Differences in Hb and CRP levels were evaluated using multivariable regression.

Results

Of 2772 patients (TNFi, 65%; IL-6Ri, 17%; JAKi, 17%) evaluated, 1044 (38%) had abnormal Hb or CRP at initiation; an additional 252 (9%) had both abnormal Hb and CRP. At month 6, the IL-6Ri group had a greater Hb increase than the TNFi (mean difference in effect on Hb: 0.28 g/dL; 95% CI 0.19–0.38) and JAKi (mean difference in effect on Hb: 0.47 g/dL; 95% CI 0.35–0.58) groups, regardless of baseline Hb status (both p < 0.001). The CRP decrease at month 6 was greater with IL-6Ri compared with TNFi and JAKi, regardless of baseline CRP status (both p < 0.05).

Conclusion

These real-world results align with the mechanism of IL-6R inhibition and may inform treatment decisions for patients with RA.

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is typically characterized by inflammation of synovial joint tissues, and symptoms may include extra-articular systemic manifestations including fatigue, anemia, weight loss, sleep disturbance, and depression [1, 2]. The pathophysiology of RA is associated with alterations in the cytokine network including increased serum and tissue levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) [1, 3]. During the acute-phase response to tissue injury and inflammation in RA, there is a large increase in the synthesis of acute-phase reactants, including serum C-reactive protein (CRP), hepcidin, amyloid A, haptoglobin, ferritin, and plasma fibrinogen [4].

Anemia is a systemic manifestation of RA and is observed in approximately one-third of patients with RA. It correlates with an increased risk of physical disability and premature mortality [5, 6]. There is an association between anemia and fatigue [7], which is a key complaint in patients with RA [8]. IL-6 appears to be the central mediator of anemia in chronic disease, through its induction of hepcidin production [5, 9,10,11]. Hepcidin is a key regulator of systemic iron homeostasis, through its effects on iron resorption and subsequent erythropoiesis: high levels of hepcidin block intestinal iron absorption and iron recycling by macrophages, leading to iron sequestration, iron-restricted erythropoiesis, and anemia [1, 12]. IL-6 secretion results in decreased levels of transferrin, the primary iron transporter that delivers iron to the bone marrow for erythropoiesis [10]. Clinical studies have reported increased serum hepcidin in patients with RA, which was associated with elevated serum IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), suggesting a potential role of IL-6 inhibition in improving hemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients with RA [13,14,15].

High levels of serum IL-6 have also been associated with raised CRP levels, which is a clinical marker of inflammation [16] that is a significant predictor of radiographic damage in patients with RA [17, 18] and has also been linked to other systemic manifestations including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and depression [19].

Despite the known association of IL-6 with anemia and CRP levels in RA, only a limited number of small or post hoc studies have evaluated the impact of biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs or tsDMARDs) on Hb and CRP levels [15, 20,21,22,23,24]. To the best of our knowledge, no single study has compared the effects of the three drug classes, TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi), IL-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), on Hb and CRP levels. We therefore undertook an assessment of the effects of TNFi, IL-6Ri, and JAKi on the levels of both Hb and CRP after 6 months of continuous therapy in adults enrolled in CorEvitas (formerly Corrona), a large US RA registry [25, 26].

Methods

Data source

The CorEvitas RA registry is an independent, prospective, national, observational cohort in which treatment and outcome data are collected from both rheumatologists and patients at the time of a clinical encounter (approximately every 6 months). Patients have been recruited from 208 private practices and academic sites across 42 US states, with 890 participating rheumatologists. As of September 2021, the CorEvitas RA registry included information on 57,300 patients. Data on 447,908 patient visits and 221,704 patient-years of follow-up observation time have been collected, with a mean patient follow-up of 4.7 (median 3.4) years. The characteristics of the CorEvitas RA registry have been described previously [25, 26].

All patients provided written informed consent and authorization before enrollment in the CorEvitas RA registry. This study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participating investigators were required to obtain full institutional review board (IRB) approval for conducting non-interventional research involving human subjects. Sponsor approval and continuing review were obtained through a central IRB (New England Independent Review Board, NEIRB No. 120160610). For academic investigative sites that did not receive a waiver to use the central IRB, full board approval was obtained from the respective governing IRBs, and documentation of approval was submitted to CorEvitas, LLC, prior to initiating any study procedures.

Study population

Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥ 18 years) who had a rheumatologist-confirmed diagnosis of RA and had initiated treatment with a TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, or infliximab), an IL-6Ri (tocilizumab or sarilumab), or a JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, or upadacitinib) during or after January 2010, until December 2019. In addition, patients were required to have both Hb and CRP data available at baseline and at month 6 (± 3 months) and to have had continued treatment with the same TNFi, IL-6Ri, or JAKi from baseline through to at least the month 6 (± 3 months) follow-up visit. Patients who discontinued therapy prior to follow-up were excluded.

Assessments

Data were collected from rheumatologist and patient questionnaires completed during routine clinical encounters that occurred over the study period. These questionnaires were used to gather information on disease activity, comorbidities, use of medications including steroids, conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), tsDMARDs, bDMARDs, and adverse events. As the CorEvitas RA registry is strictly an observational registry that reflects typical clinical practice, it does not mandate that laboratory tests, including CRP or Hb, are performed; however, it does solicit submission of laboratory results that were obtained as part of routine clinical care. Baseline patient and disease characteristics were recorded for each eligible patient.

Outcomes

The mean changes in Hb and CRP concentration were evaluated for the three treatment groups, with adjusted changes from baseline to month 6 (± 3 months) being compared between the IL-6Ri treatment group and the TNFi and JAKi treatment groups. The proportions of patients whose Hb or CRP levels improved from abnormal (Hb: < 12 g/dL for women or < 13 g/dL for men [classified as anemia] [27]; CRP: ≥ 0.8 mg/dL) to normal levels and worsened from normal to abnormal levels relative to baseline levels were evaluated. In an additional analysis, changes in Hb levels were categorized as (i) increase (change ≥ 1.5 g/dL) or no significant change (defined as decrease < 1.5 g/dL or increase < 1.5 g/dL), (ii) mild decrease (decrease ≤ 1.5 g/dL), or (iii) moderate or worse decrease (> 1.5 g/dL); 1.5 g/dL has previously been used in the literature as a threshold for Hb change [28].

Assessment of change in Hb and CRP levels

Unadjusted calculations of the mean changes in Hb and CRP levels from baseline to month 6 by drug class were undertaken. Adjusted mean changes from baseline to month 6, comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately, were calculated using multiple linear regression, reporting the mean change (beta coefficient) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

For Hb, the proportion of patients with low month 6 level, the proportion who changed from normal baseline to low month 6 level, and the proportion who changed from low baseline to normal month 6 level were reported by drug class; similarly, for CRP, the proportion of patients with high month 6 level, the proportion who changed from normal baseline to high month 6 level, and the proportion who changed from high baseline to normal month 6 level were reported by drug class. The odds of patients being in these Hb or CRP change categories at month 6, comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately, were calculated by multiple logistic regression, reporting odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI.

In an additional analysis for Hb levels, the odds of having a mild or moderate/worse decrease in Hb level by month 6 versus having an increase or no change, comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately, were calculated by multiple logistic regression, reporting OR and 95% CI. Finally, for CRP, the proportion of patients who had normal levels (≤ 0.3 mg/dL) at month 6 was reported, by drug class and for the strata of patients with CRP levels > 0.3 mg/dL at baseline.

Multiple regression models were adjusted for covariates that were imbalanced at baseline. For Hb analyses, adjusted model covariates were baseline Hb, age, duration of RA, morning stiffness duration, sex, current smoker status, prior use of one csDMARD, prior use of a non-TNFi bDMARD, white race, cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity, combination treatment with methotrexate, and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI; baseline CDAI and 6-month CDAI). For CRP analyses, adjusted model covariates were baseline CRP, age, duration of RA, EuroQol-5 Dimension score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, sex, prior use of ≥ 2 TNFi, white race, history of hyperlipidemia, and CDAI (baseline CDAI and 6-month CDAI). Adjustments across abnormal and normal baseline Hb/CRP levels were not assessed.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Patients (N = 2772) who had initiated index treatment at baseline, had received 6-month continuous treatment, and had Hb and CRP measures at both baseline and follow-up were included in this analysis (TNFi, 65% [n = 1806]; IL-6Ri, 17% [n = 485]; JAKi, 17% [n = 481]; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Selection of eligible patients from the CorEvitas RA registry who initiated treatment between January 2010 and December 2019. *Laboratory monitoring is not mandated in this observational registry; see the “Methods” section. CRP, C-reactive protein; Hb, hemoglobin; IL-6Ri, interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Full size image

Many baseline demographic and disease characteristics differed between the treatment groups (Table 1). On average, patients in the TNFi group were younger (57.6 years) than those in the IL-6Ri or JAKi group (57.9 and 60.3 years, respectively; p < 0.001 among the groups). The mean duration of RA ranged from 8.6 years in the TNFi treatment group to 12.6 years in the IL-6Ri group and 13.3 years in the JAKi group (p < 0.001 among the groups). Patients in the IL-6Ri initiators group had the highest mean baseline scores for CDAI and HAQ. Patients in the TNFi group were most likely to be initiating the treatment as a first-line biologic, whereas the majority of patients in the IL-6Ri and JAKi initiators groups were third-or-higher-line biologic initiators.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics by treatment group
Full size table

Hemoglobin and C-reactive protein

Of the 2772 patients included in the analysis, 1476 (53%) had normal Hb and CRP values at initiation, 1044 (38%) had either abnormal Hb or CRP, and 252 (9%) had abnormal Hb and CRP at initiation (see Additional file 1). Baseline characteristics by Hb status or CRP status, further stratified by drug class, are also presented in Additional file 2.

Outcomes at month 6

Hemoglobin

The overall change in Hb level from baseline to month 6 (± 3 months) (i.e., the 6-month value minus baseline value) observed in the IL-6Ri treatment group was 0.44 ± 1.06 g/dL compared with 0.12 ± 0.95 g/dL in the TNFi group and − 0.09 ± 0.94 g/dL in the JAKi group (Fig. 2A). A similar trend for a greater increase in Hb levels was observed for IL-6Ri compared with TNFi or JAKi when changes from baseline to month 6 were assessed separately for low or normal baseline Hb levels. Comparison of adjusted mean differences from baseline to month 6 between the treatment groups showed statistically significantly greater improvements in Hb levels in the IL-6Ri group compared with other treatment groups, regardless of baseline Hb levels (p < 0.001; Fig. 2B). In addition, the proportion of patients who had a low Hb level at baseline and achieved a normal Hb level at month 6 was higher in the IL-6Ri group (65%) than the TNFi (43%) and JAKi (34%) groups (Fig. 2C). The overall proportion of patients whose Hb level was low after 6 months of treatment was lower for IL-6Ri (10%) than for TNFi (14%) and JAKi (20%). Patients in the IL-6Ri group had significantly higher odds of attaining normal Hb levels at month 6 from low Hb levels at baseline compared with those in the TNFi and JAKi groups (adjusted ORs 3.15 and 3.85, respectively; both p < 0.001; Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Assessment of change in Hb level: crude mean (± SD) change in Hb level from baseline to month 6 (A). Adjusted mean change (beta coefficient ± 95% CI) in Hb level from baseline to month 6, comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately (B). Proportions of patients with low month 6 Hb level, proportions who changed from normal baseline to low month 6 Hb level, and proportions who changed from low baseline to normal month 6 Hb level (C). Odds of having a low month 6 Hb level, changing from normal baseline to low month 6 Hb level, or changing from low baseline to normal month 6 Hb level, comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately (D). *p < 0.01; **p < 0.001. Low Hb was defined as < 12 g/dL (women) or < 13 g/dL (men). Adjusted model covariates were baseline Hb, age, duration of rheumatoid arthritis, morning stiffness duration, sex, current smoker status, prior use of one conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, prior use of a non-TNFi biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, white race, cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity, combination therapy with methotrexate, and CDAI (baseline CDAI and 6-month CDAI). BL, baseline; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CI, confidence interval; Hb, hemoglobin; IL-6Ri, interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; M, month; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Full size image

Patients in the IL-6Ri group had statistically significantly lower odds of experiencing a mild decrease in Hb levels (≤ 1.5 g/dL; OR 0.55 vs TNFi and 0.35 vs JAKi; p < 0.001 for both), non-significantly lower odds of experiencing a moderate or worse Hb decrease versus TNFi (> 1.5 g/dL; OR 0.63, p = 0.16), and significantly lower odds of moderate or worse Hb decrease versus JAKi (OR 0.35; p < 0.001), compared with no change or an increase in Hb (Fig. 3). Consistent findings were observed when the same analysis was conducted for the subgroup of patients who had moderate or high CDAI at month 6 and for the subgroup with low CDAI or remission at month 6 (Additional file 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Proportion of patients with an increase or no change, mild decrease, or moderate/worse decrease in Hb level at month 6, with adjusted OR and 95% CI comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately. *p < 0.001. The OR reported are from adjusted analyses. Adjusted model covariates were baseline Hb, age, duration of rheumatoid arthritis, morning stiffness duration, sex, current smoker status, prior use of one conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, prior use of a non-TNFi biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, white race, cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity, and combination therapy with methotrexate. CI, confidence interval; Hb, hemoglobin; IL-6Ri, interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; OR, odds ratio; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Full size image

There were only two patients with Hb ≤ 8 g/dL at baseline, one each initiating a TNFi and an IL-6Ri. At the 6-month follow-up, both had low Hb, with one (the IL-6Ri initiator) experiencing an improvement in CRP to a normal level.

C-reactive protein

The overall decrease in CRP level from baseline to month 6 (± 3 months) observed in the IL-6Ri group was greater than in the TNFi and JAKi groups (Fig. 4A). Comparison of adjusted mean differences from baseline to month 6 showed statistically significantly greater reductions in CRP levels with IL-6Ri for any baseline CRP level (p < 0.001 vs TNFi and p < 0.01 vs JAKi; Fig. 4B). Statistically significantly greater reductions were reported for the IL-6Ri group versus the TNFi and JAKi groups at normal and high baseline CRP levels (p < 0.05). In addition, the proportion of patients who achieved a change in CRP level from high to normal at month 6 was higher in the IL-6Ri group (76%) than in the TNFi (46%) and JAKi (51%) groups (Fig. 4C). The overall proportion of patients with a high CRP level at month 6 was lower in the IL-6Ri group (15%) than in the TNFi (28%) and JAKi (27%) groups (Fig. 4C). Patients in the IL-6Ri group had statistically significantly higher odds of attaining normal CRP levels at month 6 from high baseline CRP levels compared with those in the TNFi and JAKi groups (p < 0.001; Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Assessment of change in CRP level: crude mean (± SD) change in CRP level from baseline to month 6 (A). Adjusted mean change (beta coefficient ± 95% CI) in CRP level from baseline to month 6, comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately (B). Proportions of patients with high month 6 CRP level, proportions who changed from normal baseline to high month 6 CRP level, and proportions who changed from high baseline to normal month 6 CRP level (C). Odds of having a high month 6 CRP level, changing from normal baseline to high month 6 CRP level, or changing from high baseline to normal month 6 CRP level, comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately (D). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. High CRP was defined as ≥ 0.8 mg/dL. Adjusted model covariates were baseline CRP, age, duration of rheumatoid arthritis, EuroQol-5 Dimension score, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, sex, prior use of ≥ 2 TNFi, white race, history of hyperlipidemia, and CDAI (baseline CDAI and 6-month CDAI). BL, baseline; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6Ri, interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; M, month; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Full size image

The proportion of patients whose CRP level was ≤ 0.3 mg/dL at month 6 was higher in the IL-6Ri group (72%) than in the TNFi (47%) and JAKi (48%) groups. Among patients whose CRP at treatment initiation was > 0.3 mg/dL, those proportions were 62%, 28%, and 27% (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Proportion of patients with CRP level ≤ 0.3 mg/dL at month 6. CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6Ri, interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Full size image

Discussion

In this analysis of real-world data from a large US RA registry, we observed that 6 months of continuous therapy with an IL-6R inhibitor was associated with improvements in Hb and CRP levels, regardless of the level at baseline, which were greater than improvements achieved with continuous 6-month therapy with either a TNF inhibitor or a JAK inhibitor. In addition, a greater proportion of patients who had abnormal Hb or CRP levels at baseline achieved normal levels at month 6 after therapy with IL-6 inhibition compared with TNF inhibitor or JAK inhibitor users.

While the number of studies evaluating the effects of these agents on Hb and CRP levels is limited, our results agree with previous findings indicating that IL-6R inhibitors have the greatest benefit in improving Hb levels in patients with RA. A post hoc analysis of data from the phase 3 MONARCH study found that treatment with sarilumab resulted in significantly greater increases in Hb than treatment with the TNF inhibitor adalimumab [20]. In a smaller trial, treatment with the IL-6R inhibitor tocilizumab was associated with greater reductions in serum hepcidin-25 than treatment with the TNF inhibitor infliximab. The reduction in serum hepcidin observed in the infliximab group was accompanied by a decrease in serum IL-6, allowing for the possibility that the effect of TNF-α inhibition on the reduction of hepcidin-25 levels was indirect, occurring via IL-6 inhibition [15]. Another study of patients from the Japanese KURAMA database demonstrated a significantly greater increase of Hb in the tocilizumab group than in the non-tocilizumab group, with a significant association between the increase in Hb levels and lower Hb and higher CRP levels at baseline, as well as with a greater reduction in disease activity (CDAI) [23].

As noted, the greater improvements in Hb and CRP levels with IL-6R inhibitor treatment than with TNF inhibitor or JAK inhibitor treatment observed in our analysis are consistent with the IL-6 mechanism of action: an increase in serum IL-6 results in increased production of hepcidin (which reduces the levels of available iron and therefore Hb) and CRP in hepatocytes [29]. Furthermore, the observed greater improvement in Hb with IL-6R versus JAK inhibition might be due to a reduction of erythropoiesis via JAK2 inhibition, causing some of the beneficial effects of reducing inflammation (i.e., increased Hb) to be partially offset [30]. Although the IL-6 pathway can be inhibited by either IL-6R or JAK inhibitors [31], our data suggest a more pronounced effect on anemia and inflammation with an anti-IL-6R treatment.

The findings of this study have potential clinical implications. In a recent analysis of patients from a phase 3 trial, a higher risk of joint damage progression over 1 year, as assessed by radiographic imaging, was reported for patients with low baseline Hb; in both patients with low and normal baseline Hb from that study, sarilumab improved the radiological outcomes compared with placebo over 1 year [32]. Furthermore, some studies suggest an association between improvements in Hb and patient-reported outcomes, including energy levels and quality of life [11]. CRP is a key marker of inflammation, with increased levels being associated with a higher incidence of CVD [33, 34]. In patients with RA, elevated CRP levels have been associated with increased risk for many comorbidities, including CVD [19]. In the general population, an increased risk of CVD with CRP > 0.3 mg/dL has been observed [35]; a similar increase in CVD risk has also been observed in patients with RA [36]. In addition, an analysis of data from a phase 3 study of sarilumab and adalimumab showed that patients receiving either of these drugs over 24 weeks who achieve CRP ≤ 0.3 mg/dL at week 12 have improved quality of life, as assessed by patient-reported outcomes in the areas of pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, and sleep, at week 24 [37].

This study has several limitations. First, due to the observational nature of the registry, the assignment of patient treatment is made by their physician; therefore, patients may receive treatment based on the differences in underlying prognostic factors (channeling). While the analyses were adjusted for known differences across treatment groups, unmeasured confounding may still be present in the data. We did not include a variance adjustment for the possibility that patients may contribute multiple observations to the analysis. In addition, the three drug classes varied in the proportions who remained on the therapy to 6-month follow-up, out of all patients who had initiated that therapy in the study period (TNFi, 64%; IL-6Ri, 53%; JAKi, 47%). Since our study included only patients who remained on therapy, we might have selected patients who had more favorable outcomes on therapies, and we could have excluded patients who either did not respond to therapy or had an adverse event, including an abnormality in laboratory values. This was a completer’s analysis, focusing only on those who remained on therapy through the 6-month follow-up visit and who had laboratory values at both time points. As noted, the CorEvitas observational RA registry does not mandate specific laboratory analyses. Laboratory monitoring decisions are left to the discretion of the investigator. It is therefore possible that the selection of patients for measurement of these laboratory parameters could represent ascertainment or information bias, that is, patients who have laboratory abnormalities are more likely to have laboratory testing or to have reported abnormalities in the registry.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this investigation is the first real-world analysis comparing the effects of multiple classes of targeted DMARDs on systemic inflammation and Hb levels, with results that align with the proposed mechanism of IL-6R inhibition. Our findings may be useful when considering treatment options for patients with RA.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available from CorEvitas, LLC through a commercial subscription agreement and are not publicly available. No additional data are available from the authors.

Abbreviations

bDMARD:

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug

BMI:

Body mass index

CCP:

Cyclic citrullinated peptide

CDAI:

Clinical Disease Activity Index

CI:

Confidence interval

CRP:

C-reactive protein

csDMARD:

Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

HAQ:

Health Assessment Questionnaire

Hb:

Hemoglobin

IL:

Interleukin

IL-6Ri:

Interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor(s)

IRB:

Institutional review board

JAKi:

Janus kinase inhibitor(s)

OR:

Odds ratio

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

RF:

Rheumatoid factor

SD:

Standard deviation

TNFi:

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor(s)

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

tsDMARDs:

Targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug

References

  1. Dayer JM, Choy E. Therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis: the interleukin-6 receptor. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(1):15–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris ED Jr. Rheumatoid arthritis. Pathophysiology and implications for therapy. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(18):1277–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Voulgari PV, Kolios G, Papadopoulos GK, Katsaraki A, Seferiadis K, Drosos AA. Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of anemia of chronic disease in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Immunol. 1999;92(2):153–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(6):448–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganz T. Hepcidin, a key regulator of iron metabolism and mediator of anemia of inflammation. Blood. 2003;102(3):783–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiss G, Goodnough LT. Anemia of chronic disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):1011–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaltwasser JP, Kessler U, Gottschalk R, Stucki G, Moller B. Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin and intravenous iron on anemia and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(11):2430–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Choy EHS, Calabrese LH. Neuroendocrine and neurophysiological effects of interleukin 6 in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(11):1885–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Han C, Rahman MU, Doyle MK, Bathon JM, Smolen J, Kavanaugh A, et al. Association of anemia and physical disability among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(11):2177–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nemeth E, Valore EV, Territo M, Schiller G, Lichtenstein A, Ganz T. Hepcidin, a putative mediator of anemia of inflammation, is a type II acute-phase protein. Blood. 2003;101(7):2461–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson A, Yu HT, Goodnough LT, Nissenson AR. Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2004;116(Suppl 7A):50S–7S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pagani A, Nai A, Silvestri L, Camaschella C. Hepcidin and anemia: a tight relationship. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Demirag MD, Haznedaroglu S, Sancak B, Konca C, Gulbahar O, Ozturk MA, et al. Circulating hepcidin in the crossroads of anemia and inflammation associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Intern Med. 2009;48(6):421–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim HR, Kim KW, Yoon SY, Kim SH, Lee SH. Serum pro-hepcidin could reflect disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25(3):348–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Song SN, Iwahashi M, Tomosugi N, Uno K, Yamana J, Yamana S, et al. Comparative evaluation of the effects of treatment with tocilizumab and TNF-alpha inhibitors on serum hepcidin, anemia response and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(5):R141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madhok R, Crilly A, Watson J, Capell HA. Serum interleukin 6 levels in rheumatoid arthritis: correlations with clinical and laboratory indices of disease activity. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993;52(3):232–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smolen JS, Van Der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, Emery P, Bathon JM, Keystone E, et al. Predictors of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with high-dose methotrexate with or without concomitant infliximab: results from the ASPIRE trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(3):702–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Leeuwen MA, van der Heijde DM, van Rijswijk MH, Houtman PM, van Riel PL, van de Putte LB, et al. Interrelationship of outcome measures and process variables in early rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison of radiologic damage, physical disability, joint counts, and acute phase reactants. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(3):425–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pope JE, Choy EH. C-reactive protein and implications in rheumatoid arthritis and associated comorbidities. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51(1):219–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Burmester GR, Hagino O, Dong Q, Stanislav M, Gomez-Centeno A, Selmi C, et al. Unique changes in hemoglobin with sarilumab versus adalimumab are independent of better disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Arthritis. Rheumatol. 2018;70(suppl 10):Abstract 1528.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dougados M, Choy EH, Kameda H, van Adelsberg J, Fay J, Fiore S, et al. IL-6R blockade with sarilumab plus methotrexate results in changes in clinical and laboratory parameters associated with chronic inflammation in patients with moderate-to-severe RA in a phase 3 study. Arthritis Rheum. 2015;67(suppl 10):Abstract 2761.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Doyle MK, Rahman MU, Han C, Han J, Giles J, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. Treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate improves anemia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis independent of improvement in other clinical outcome measures-a pooled analysis from three large, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2009;39(2):123–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hashimoto M, Fujii T, Hamaguchi M, Furu M, Ito H, Terao C, et al. Increase of hemoglobin levels by anti-IL-6 receptor antibody (tocilizumab) in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schulze-Koops H, Strand V, Nduaka C, DeMasi R, Wallenstein G, Kwok K, et al. Analysis of haematological changes in tofacitinib-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis across phase 3 and long-term extension studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(1):46–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. CorEvitas. Rheumatoid arthritis registry. Available from https://www.corrona.org/registry/rheumatoid-arthritis. Accessed 19 Nov 2020.

  26. Kremer J. The CORRONA database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 4:iv37–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2011 (WHO/NMH/NHD/MNM/11.1). Available from http://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.

  28. Languasco A, Cazap N, Marciano S, Huber M, Novillo A, Poletta F, et al. Hemoglobin concentration variations over time in general medical inpatients. J Hosp Med. 2010;5(5):283–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(10):a016295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Choy EH. Clinical significance of Janus kinase inhibitor selectivity. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58(6):953–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz DM, Kanno Y, Villarino A, Ward M, Gadina M, O’Shea JJ. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;17(1):78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Burmester G, Morello J, Hagino O, Praestgaard A, Fiore S, Genovese M. Association between low hemoglobin and radiographic progression over 52 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a phase 3 trial of sarilumab. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(Suppl 1):Poster SAT0100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Buring JE, Cook NR. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(20):1557–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, Rifai N, Rose LM, McCabe CH, et al. C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):20–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yeh ET, Willerson JT. Coming of age of C-reactive protein: using inflammation markers in cardiology. Circulation. 2003;107(3):370–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kochi M, Kohagura K, Shiohira Y, Iseki K, Ohya Y. Inflammation as a risk of developing chronic kidney disease in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tesser J, Wright G, Strand V, Kaine J, Maslova K, St John G, et al. Association between changes in C-reactive protein at Week 12 and patient-reported outcomes at Week 24 with sarilumab therapy across three pivotal phase 3 studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(Suppl 1):Poster FRI0108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Wendi Malley, MS, for her contributions to the data analysis and interpretation of the data for this manuscript. Medical writing assistance was provided by Richard J. Hogan, PhD, and Vojislav Pejović, PhD, of Elevate Scientific Solutions, a division of Envision Pharma Group, and editorial and graphics assistance was provided by Elevate Scientific Solutions. This support was funded by Sanofi. Amy Praestgaard, MS (Sanofi), provided a statistical review.

Funding

The RA registry was sponsored by CorEvitas, LLC, and this analysis was funded by Sanofi. Access to study data was limited to CorEvitas. CorEvitas statisticians completed all the analyses; all authors contributed to the interpretation of the results. CorEvitas has been supported through contracted subscriptions since 2020 by AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, LEO, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer Inc., Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun, and UCB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern California Arthritis Center, 120 La Casa Via, Suite 204, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA

    Anthony S. Padula

  2. CorEvitas, Waltham, MA, USA

    Dimitrios A. Pappas, Taylor S. Blachley, Kelechi Emeanuru & Joel M. Kremer

  3. Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA

    Stefano Fiore & Kerri Ford

  4. Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Kelechi Emeanuru

Authors
  1. Anthony S. Padula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dimitrios A. Pappas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefano Fiore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Taylor S. Blachley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kerri Ford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kelechi Emeanuru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Joel M. Kremer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors were involved in the design of the study, interpreted the data, were responsible for the drafting of the manuscript, and critically revised the drafts. Data were collected by ASP, DAP, KE, and JMK. Statistical analysis was done by TSB. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors, who had full access to all of the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony S. Padula.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participating investigators were required to obtain full board approval for conducting research involving human subjects. Sponsor approval and continuing review were obtained through a central IRB (New England Independent Review Board, NEIRB No. 120160610). For academic investigative sites that did not receive a waiver to use the central IRB, approval was obtained from the respective governing IRBs, and documentation of approval was submitted to the sponsor prior to initiating any study procedures. All registry subjects were required to provide written informed consent prior to participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

ASP has nothing to disclose. DAP is an employee of CorEvitas, LLC and may own company stock; he is also a consultant for Novartis, Regeneron, and Roche. SF and KF are employees of Sanofi and may hold shares and/or stock options in the company. TSB is an employee of CorEvitas, LLC. KE was an employee of CorEvitas, LLC during the development of this study. JMK has an equity interest in CorEvitas, LLC and consults for them.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is related to https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02891-x.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Baseline characteristics by hemoglobin and CRP status at treatment initiation.

Additional file 2.

(i) Baseline characteristics by hemoglobin status at treatment initiation, stratified by treatment group and (ii) baseline characteristics by CRP status at treatment initiation, stratified by treatment group.

Additional file 3.

Proportion of patients with increase or no change, mild decrease, or moderate/worse decrease in Hb level at Month 6, with adjusted OR and 95% CI comparing IL-6Ri with TNFi and JAKi separately: (i) patients who had moderate or high CDAI at month 6 and (ii) patients who had low CDAI or remission at month 6.

Additional file 4.

The RECORD statement.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padula, A.S., Pappas, D.A., Fiore, S. et al. The effect of targeted rheumatoid arthritis therapeutics on systemic inflammation and anemia: analysis of data from the CorEvitas RA registry. Arthritis Res Ther 24, 276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02955-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02955-y

Keywords

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us