- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Nintedanib downregulates the profibrotic M2 phenotype in cultured monocyte-derived macrophages obtained from systemic sclerosis patients affected by interstitial lung disease
Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 26, Article number: 74 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by vasculopathy and progressive fibrosis of skin and several internal organs, including lungs. Macrophages are the main cells involved in the immune-inflammatory damage of skin and lungs, and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages seem to have a profibrotic role through the release of profibrotic cytokines (IL10) and growth factors (TGFβ1). Nintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting several fibrotic mediators and it is approved for the treatment of SSc-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). The study aimed to evaluate the effect of nintedanib in downregulating the profibrotic M2 phenotype in cultured monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) obtained from SSc-ILD patients.
Methods
Fourteen SSc patients, fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria for SSc, 10 SSc patients affected by ILD (SSc-ILD pts), 4 SSc patients non affected by ILD (SSc pts no-ILD), and 5 voluntary healthy subjects (HSs), were recruited at the Division of Clinical Rheumatology-University of Genova, after obtaining Ethical Committee approval and patients’ informed consent. Monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood, differentiated into MDMs, and then maintained in growth medium without any treatment (untreated cells), or treated with nintedanib (0.1 and 1µM) for 3, 16, and 24 h. Gene expression of macrophage scavenger receptors (CD204, CD163), mannose receptor-1 (CD206), Mer tyrosine kinase (MerTK), identifying M2 macrophages, together with TGFβ1 and IL10, were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Protein synthesis was investigated by Western blotting and the level of active TGFβ1 was evaluated by ELISA. Statistical analysis was carried out using non-parametric Wilcoxon test.
Results
Cultured untreated SSc-ILD MDMs showed a significant increased protein synthesis of CD206 (p < 0.05), CD204, and MerTK (p < 0.01), together with a significant upregulation of the gene expression of MerTK and TGFβ1 (p < 0.05; p < 0.01) compared to HS-MDMs. Moreover, the protein synthesis of CD206 and MerTK and the gene expression of TGFβ1 were significantly higher in cultured untreated MDMs from SSc-ILD pts compared to MDMs without ILD (p < 0.05; p < 0.01). In cultured SSc-ILD MDMs, nintedanib 0.1 and 1µM significantly downregulated the gene expression and protein synthesis of CD204, CD206, CD163 (p < 0.05), and MerTK (p < 0.01) compared to untreated cells after 24 h of treatment. Limited to MerTK and IL10, both nintedanib concentrations significantly downregulated their gene expression already after 16 h of treatment (p < 0.05). In cultured SSc-ILD MDMs, nintedanib 0.1 and 1µM significantly reduced the release of active TGFβ1 after 24 h of treatment (p < 0.05 vs. untreated cells).
Conclusions
In cultured MDMs from SSc-ILD pts, nintedanib seems to downregulate the profibrotic M2 phenotype through the significant reduction of gene expression and protein synthesis of M2 cell surface markers, together with the significant reduction of TGFβ1 release, and notably MerTK, a tyrosine kinase receptor involved in lung fibrosis.
Background
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex immune-mediated connective tissue disease characterized by vasculopathy and a progressive fibrosis of the skin and several internal organs, including lung and heart [1]. The pathogenesis of SSc involves a combination of genetic, epigenetic, environmental, and immunological factors, which contribute to microvascular damage, immune dysregulation and finally to an excessive production and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules by myofibroblasts, including type I collagen, fibronectin and vimentin [2].
Together with the alteration of microcirculation, the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses represents a prominent driver of SSc pathophysiology [3]. Circulating inflammatory cells, primarily monocytes and T lymphocytes, are recruited and, along with tissue-resident immune macrophages, they initiate the production of cytokines and chemokines, such as transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1) and interleukine-10 (IL10) [3]. Recent studies have identified monocytes and macrophages as possible crucial mediators of the fibrotic process in SSc [4,5,6,7].
Current research clearly demonstrated that macrophages are characterized by a high plasticity, and they can polarize into different phenotypes depending on the microenvironment conditions and stimuli; the traditional classification identified two polarized macrophage subsets, called classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages, which represent the extremes of a broader spectrum of functional states (8–9). Furthermore, once macrophages adopt a particular phenotype, they can change its polarization in response to new environmental stimuli [10, 11].
M2 macrophages are involved in wound-healing processes and primarily produce anti-inflammatory cytokines [11]. They express specific phenotype markers on their cell membrane, including mannose receptor 1 type C (CD206), macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (CD204), hemoglobin scavenger receptor (CD163), and functional markers like the MER proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (MerTK) [12]. They also release specific cytokines and chemokines, such as IL10, CC-motif chemokine ligand-17 (CCL17), CCL18, CCL22, and profibrotic growth factors like TGFβ1 [12]. Among cytokines and growth factors which mediate the polarization of macrophages toward an M2 phenotype, including IL4 and IL13, tyrosine kinases, such as spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) seems to be involved in promoting this polarized status [5].
Recently, an increasing amount of evidences confirmed the pivotal role of M2 macrophages in the development of fibrosis in SSc patients: these cells infiltrate damaged skin and lung, either through the recruitment and in situ differentiation of circulating monocytes into macrophages, the maturation of in situ precursors, and the activation of resident macrophages [13,14,15,16]. These observations are supported by studies demonstrating elevated serum levels of M2 inducers such as IL4, IL13 and IL10 in SSc patients [14]. Immune system activation and the sustained release of cytokines from M2 macrophages and T helper-2 lymphocytes (Th2) contribute to the persistence of tissue damage and inefficient tissue repair [16, 17].
Nintedanib is an intracellular inhibitor of tyrosine kinases that targets platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) A and B, fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs), vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs), and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) [18]. Oral treatment with nintedanib has been approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), showing slower disease progression by reducing the rate of decline of forced vital capacity (FVC) [19, 20]. In vitro studies demonstrated an antifibrotic capability of nintedanib both on cultured fibrocytes (as circulating fibroblast precursors) isolated from SSc patients and on cultured lung fibroblasts, blocking their transition into myofibroblasts and profibrotic activity [21, 22].
In a mouse model of SSc, nintedanib effectively blocked myofibroblast differentiation and reduced pulmonary, dermal, and myocardial fibrosis [22].
Based on these observations, this in vitro study investigated the potential effect of nintedanib in downregulating the M2 macrophage phenotype and its related profibrotic role in cultured monocytes-derived macrophages (MDMs) obtained from SSc patients affected by ILD (SSc-ILD) analyzing the gene expression and protein synthesis of specific cell membrane and functional markers of M2 phenotype (CD204, CD206, CD163, and MerTK). The release of profibrotic TGFβ1 was also investigated.
Methods
Demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled SSc-ILD patients
Fourteen SSc patients, followed by the Division of Clinical Rheumatology, University of Genova, Italy, were enrolled following the approval of the Ethical Committee of the Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (237REG2015, amendment number:002–28/05/2018) and the collection of the written informed consent.
The patients were included according to the 2013 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria for SSc [23]. Clinimetrics was executed according to good clinical practice guidelines [24]. The presence of ILD was confirmed through a routinely administered high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) [25, 26].
The definition of ILD in SSc patients has been adapted from the American Thoracic Society guidelines for IPF, which include the radiologic presence of traction bronchiectasis, traction bronchiolectasis, ground-glass opacities, reticulation, honeycombing, other interstitial lung abnormalities, a combination of these findings or any recognized interstitial composite pattern [26]. Based on that, four enrolled SSc patients were not characterized by the presence of ILD, and they were included in the group of “SSc patients no-ILD”. Demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled SSc patients, including auto-antibodies profile, therapies, and clinical organ involvement are summarized in Table 1.
In particular, the mean age was 63.6 ± 14 years in SSc-ILD patients and 64.7 ± 9.4 years in SSc patients no-ILD; the mean disease duration was 7.2 ± 5.1 years in SSc-ILD patients and 14.75 ± 5.91 years in SSc patients no-ILD; there were 7 female (70%) and 3 male SSc-ILD patients, whereas the SSc patients no-ILD were all female. The most common autoantibody among patients was anti-topoisomerase-I antibody (Scl70). Skin involvement was present in all subjects and was classified according to LeRoy and Medsger criteria [27]: the 50% of patients in both groups had “limited” cutaneous SSc (lcSSc), and the 50% had “diffuse” cutaneous SSc (dcSSc). The mean modified Rodnan skin (mRSS) score was 8.7 ± 6.68 in SSc-ILD patients and 6.11 ± 4.84 in SSc patients no-ILD; all SSc-ILD patients and 3 SSc patients no-ILD had digital ulcers (DUs) or a history of DUs.
Regarding other relevant disease targets in the SSc-ILD group, 4 patients (40%) showed gastrointestinal involvement, one patient (10%) had renal involvement, and no patients had pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the group of SSc patients no-ILD, all patients showed gastrointestinal involvement, one patient had pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and no patients had renal involvement.
Among the enrolled SSc-ILD patients, the average forced vital capacity (FVC) was 89.7% ± 32.5 of the predicted value, the average forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was 87.7% ± 27.5 of the predicted value, and the average diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 66.7% ± 28.8 of the predicted value.
All patients were under standard immunosuppressant therapy; in the SSc-ILD patient group, the most used drugs were mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), prednisone (PDN), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), methotrexate (MTX), and rituximab (RTX). We considered for rituximab not only the current administration of the drug, but also an historical use of it.
From the vasodilatory perspective, 4 patients (40%) were treated with endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA), 1 patient (8.3%) was treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-i), and 4 patients (40%) were treated with intravenous prostanoid regimens using iloprost. In the group of SSc patients no-ILD, one patient was treated with HCQ, one patient was treated with iloprost, one patient was treated with ERA, two patients were treated with PDE5i, and two patients were treated with ACEi. All enrolled SSc patients never received nintedanib treatment. Finally, five age matched voluntary healthy subjects (HSs) were included into the study.
Isolation of monocytes, differentiation into MDMs and treatment
Venous blood sample (20mL) was collected from all enrolled HSs, SSc patients no-ILD and SSc-ILD patients, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated through density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque, in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). Monocytes were isolated from PBMCs using the EasySep human monocyte enrichment kit without CD16 depletion (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada), and their viability and purity were assessed by Flow Cytometry.
The isolated monocytes were plated in tissue culture dishes (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at the concentration of 1.5 × 106 cells and then stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, 5 ng/mL) in growth medium (RPMI with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 1% L-glutamine, Euroclone, Milan, Italy) for 24 h to induce their differentiation into MDMs.
Subsequently, only cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients were subjected to the treatment with nintedanib as follows: a part of cultured MDMs was maintained in growth medium without any treatment (untreated cells), another part was treated with nintedanib (Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany) at the concentration of 0.1µM, and another part was treated with nintedanib at the concentration of 1µM for 3, 16, and 24 h.
Cultured MDMs obtained from HSs as well as from SSc patients no-ILD were maintained in growth medium without any treatment (untreated cells) for 24 h.
At the end of the treatment, conditioned medium was collected to investigate the level of the active form of TGFβ1 (as a specific profibrotic M2 cytokine), whereas cultured MDMs were lysed to isolate both RNA and proteins for the evaluation of gene and protein expression of specific M2 cell surface phenotype (CD204, CD163, CD206) and functional markers (MerTK, IL10, TGFβ1) using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting. The in vitro experiments were performed on cultured MDMs obtained from each enrolled SSc-ILD patient, obtaining a total number of ten independent in vitro experiments. The experimental design was represented in Fig. 1.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
RNA was isolated using the RNA/Protein Purification Plus kit (Norgen Biotech, Thorold, Canada) and quantified by nanodrop to assess its integrity. For each experimental condition, first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy). The qRT-PCR was performed on an Eppendorf Realplex 4 mastercycler (Eppendorf) using a SYBR green mastermix detection system in a total volume of 10 µl, loaded in triplicate.
M2 phenotype markers were investigated using the specific primers for human CD204 (NM_002445), CD206 (NM_002438), CD163 (NM_004244), as cell membrane markers, and primers for human MerTK (NM_006343), TGFβ1 (NM_000660) and IL10 (NM_000572), as functional markers. Primers for human β-actin (NM_001101) was used as housekeeping gene.
Gene expression values have been calculated using the comparative ΔΔ cycle threshold (ΔΔCT) method and corresponded to the expression level (fold-increase) of the target gene compared to untreated cells [28]. The melting curve was included in all qRT-PCR assays to confirm the specificity of the SYBR green assay.
Western blotting and related densitometric analysis
Proteins were isolated using the RNA/Protein Purification Plus kit (Norgen Biotech) and quantified by Bradford method. Subsequently, 20 µg of protein was separated via electrophoresis on pre-cast 4–20% gradient tris-glycine gels (GenScript, Piscataway, USA) and then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). After 1 h in blocking solution, membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against human CD204 (dilution 1:400, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Dallas, Texas, USA) CD206, CD163, MerTK (dilution 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, dilution 1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies). Membranes were subsequently incubated with specific horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (dilution 1:2,000; Cell Signaling Technology) for 1 h at room temperature.
Protein synthesis was detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (SuperSignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA) and the densitometric analysis was performed by the UVITEC Image Analysis System (UVITEC, Cambridge, UK).
For each experimental condition, the value of the protein synthesis of the investigated molecules was normalized to that of the GAPDH as housekeeping protein. The resulting value of each treatment was then normalized to that of the corresponding untreated cells (considered as the unit value).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Cell supernatants were collected and stored at -80 °C. The endogenous level of the active form of TGFβ1 was determined by ELISA assay using Ella automated immunoassay system, in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (Bio-techne, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA).
In the first phase of the procedure (sample activation step), 80µL of sample was mixed with 20µL of 1 N HCl and incubated for 10 min at room temperature to acidify the sample. At the end of incubation, the acidification of samples was neutralized by adding 20µL of 1.2 N NaOH/0.5 M HEPES solution to obtain an activated cell culture supernatant, which was subsequently diluted 5 folds with a specific sample diluent (20µL of activated sample was added to 80µL of sample diluent). At the end of this phase, 25µL of each diluted sample was transferred into the TGFβ1 Ella cartridge.
The levels of TGFβ1 in the conditioned medium were expressed as pg/mL.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out by non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test using GraphPad Prism (version 8.4.0, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) to compare gene and protein expression of investigated M2 markers between cultured MDMs obtained from HSs, SSc patients no-ILD, and SSc-ILD patients. Moreover, non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used to compare paired treatments of each in vitro experiment with cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients and treated with nintedanib. Any p value lower than 0.05 has been considered as statistically significant. Results of qRT-PCR and Western blotting were analyzed and graphically reported as median with range.
Results
Cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients showed a higher profibrotic M2 phenotype
Cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients and SSc patients no-ILD were characterized by a significantly higher synthesis of the cell membrane marker CD204 compared to cultured MDMs obtained from HSs (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2A). Of note, cultured MDMs from SSc-ILD patients showed a significantly higher protein synthesis of CD206 (other cell membrane marker of M2 phenotype) and the functional marker MerTK compared of cultured MDMs from HSs and from SSc patients no-ILD (CD206: p < 0.05; MerTK: p < 0.01 vs. HS; p < 0.05 vs. SSc patients no-ILD) (Fig. 2A).
Moreover, MerTK was significantly higher expressed also at gene expression level in cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients compared to cultured MDMs from HS together with the gene expression of TGFβ1, another functional marker of the profibrotic M2 phenotype (p < 0.05; p < 0.01, respectively) (Fig. 2B). Cultured MDMs of SSc-ILD patients were characterized by a significantly higher gene expression of TGFβ1 also compared to cultured MDMs of SSc patients no-ILD (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2B).
Nintedanib downregulated the gene expression of cell membrane and functional markers of profibrotic M2 phenotype in cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients
In cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients, nintedanib at the concentrations of 0.1 and 1µM significantly downregulated the gene expression of CD204, CD206, and CD163 compared to untreated cells after 24 h of treatment (p < 0.05 for all phenotype markers) (Fig. 3). Nintedanib did not induce any significant modulation in the gene expression of M2-related cell membrane markers after 3 and 16 h of treatment compared to untreated cells (Fig. 3). Interestingly, no significant differences were detected between the two nintedanib concentrations (0.1 and 1µM) in their capability to downregulate the gene expression of all the investigated markers.
Regarding the effects on functional markers, nintedanib (both 0.1 and 1µM) induced a significant downregulation of the gene expression of MerTK and IL10 already after 16 h of treatment compared to untreated cells (p < 0.05 for both markers). Of note, the downregulatory effect of nintedanib on the gene expression of MerTK was further significantly increased after 24 h (p < 0.01) (Fig. 3).
No significant modulation of the gene expression of TGFβ1 was observed in nintedanib-treated cells compared to untreated cells at all time points (3, 16, 24 h) (Fig. 3).
Although no significant differences were observed between the two concentrations of nintedanib (0.1 and 1µM) in their capability to downregulate the gene expression of the investigated M2 markers, a trend toward a more evident downregulatory effect exerted by nintedanib 1µM versus 0.1µM was evident for CD206 (24 h), MerTK (16 and 24 h) and IL10 (16 h) (Fig. 3).
Nintedanib reduced the protein synthesis of cell membrane and functional markers of profibrotic M2 phenotype in cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients
In cultured SSc-ILD MDMs, nintedanib 0.1 and 1µM did not induced any significant decrease in the protein synthesis of CD204, CD206, and CD163 compared to untreated cells after 3 and 16 h of treatment (Fig. 4).
On the contrary, nintedanib significantly reduced the protein synthesis of CD204, CD206, CD163 after 24 h of treatment compared to untreated cells both at the concentration of 0.1 and 1µM (p < 0.05 for CD204 and CD206; CD163 p < 0.01 for both concentrations) (Fig. 4).
After 24 h of treatment, nintedanib also significantly reduced the protein synthesis of the functional M2 marker MerTK compared to untreated cells (p < 0.01 for both concentrations), while no statistically significant differences emerged at 3 and 16 h (Fig. 4).
Although no significant differences between the two concentrations of nintedanib in the capability to reduce the protein synthesis of CD204, CD206, CD163, and MerTK was observed, a trend toward a greater reduction exerted by nintedanib 1µM was visible at 24 h (Fig. 4).
Nintedanib reduced the production and release of TGFβ1 in cultured MDMs obtained from SSc-ILD patients
To investigate the production and release of the active form of the profibrotic growth factor TGFβ1, an ELISA assay was performed testing the conditioned medium of cultured SSc-ILD MDMs.
Cultured untreated MDMs were characterized by a significantly increased production and release of the TGFβ1 between 3 and 16 h (p < 0.05), and between 3 and 24 h (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5).
On the contrary, nintedanib at the concentrations of 0.1 and 1µM significantly reduced the production and release of TGFβ1 only after 24 h of treatment compared to untreated cells in cultured MDMs from SSc-ILD patients (p < 0.05 for both concentrations) (Fig. 5).
Discussion
The results of this study showed that cultured MDMs obtained from SSc patients affected by ILD, seem to be significantly characterized by a stronger M2 phenotype at higher profibrotic activity (CD204, CD206 and CD163) compared to cultured MDMs from HSs and MDMs obtained from SSc patients without ILD, particularly for a significantly higher gene expression of TGFβ1 and MerTK.
In fact, the lowest expression just for CD206 and CD163 cell markers, observed in cultured MDMs from SSc patients without ILD compared to those of SSc patients with ILD at baseline, might suggest that these M2 markers seem associated with the presence of ILD; based on these observations further investigations are ongoing.
In addition, the results of the present study highlight for the first time the capability of nintedanib to significantly downregulate in vitro the activity of the profibrotic M2 macrophage phenotype obtained from SSc patients affected by ILD, by reducing gene expression and protein synthesis of cell markers (CD204, CD206 and CD163).
More interestingly, nintedanib induced a reduction of the profibrotic M2 phenotype also at a functional level, through the significantly downregulation of the gene expression and protein synthesis of MerTK. .
MerTK is a member of the Tyro-3, Axl, and Mer (TAM) receptor tyrosine kinase family expressed on alveolar macrophages that recognizes apoptotic cells during efferocytosis [29, 30]. M2 macrophage populations have been found to play a functional role to induce the trans differentiation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in myofibroblasts through MerTK, promoting fibrogenesis in chronic disease such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [31]. In particular, it seems that the polymorphic status of MerTK gene may play a key role not only in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of HSCs (contributing to the increased presence of myofibroblasts) and in the immune response (as checkpoint protein), but also in the mechanisms involved in fibrosis progression and then carcinogenesis [32, 33].
Recently, an elevated MerTK expression was found in lung macrophages of patients affected by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and from mice with bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis [33, 34]. In vitro studies showed that macrophages overexpressing MerTK showed profibrotic effects whereas macrophage efferocytosis deleted the profibrotic effect of MerTK by tis downregulation. Interestingly, in pulmonary fibrosis, the negative regulation by macrophage efferocytosis is defective, and MerTK mainly exhibits profibrotic effects, suggesting that targeting MerTK in macrophages may help to attenuate pulmonary fibrosis [32].
Moreover, in lung fibrosis, macrophages characterized by a highly expression of MerTK promoted the production of TGFβ1, which mediated the activation of other fibrotic cells, including fibroblasts, and their capability to overproduce collagen, therefore further and strongly suggesting a profibrotic role of macrophage MerTK [32].
In agreement, in our investigation, the antifibrotic role of nintedanib was indeed suggested by its capability to significantly reduce the production and release of TGFβ1 after 24 h of treatment in cultured MDMs from SSc-ILD patients compared to untreated cells. Of note, the discrepancy observed between the results of gene expression and protein synthesis of TGF-β1 might be limited to the effect of nintedanib on the intracellular process involving the activation of the TGF-β1 from the inactive to the active protein, without having any effect on the gene expression [35].
Therefore, for the first time our results might suggest that clinical beneficial effect obtained by treating ILD in SSc patients and related to reduced lung fibrosis, might well implicate the downregulation of the M2 profibrotic macrophage activity, as shown in the present study by the significant downregulation and reduction of the functional proteins MerTK and TGFβ1. All these observations provide additional evidence supporting the antifibrotic role of nintedanib, previously observed in cultured fibrocytes and fibroblasts [36].
Notably, these results also highlight macrophages as successful targets for the action of nintedanib in treating fibrosis in SSc patients with ILD.
Fibrosis is a hallmark of SSc pathogenesis and is significantly influenced by the aberrant interplay between immune cells, playing a crucial role in the development of SSc-related ILD, a severe complication that contributes remarkably to mortality in SSc patients [37, 38]. Over the past few decades, mounting evidence has confirmed the fundamental role of M2 macrophages in the development of fibrosis in SSc [14].
Macrophages are fundamental cells for the activation of other important players of the fibrotic process, such as fibroblasts [5]. In fact, in affected tissue, the activation of macrophages as well as their precursors monocytes can induce the activation of fibroblasts into profibrotic myofibroblasts, through the release of cytokines and growth factor, including TGF-β1 [5, 39].
This seems to be supported by Lodyga M, who demonstrated that cadherin-11-mediated junctions maintain macrophages and fibroblasts in close proximity, and macrophages induce the transition of fibroblasts into profibrotic myofibroblasts through the production of TGF-β1 [40].
All these observations further suggest not only the role of macrophages in the profibrotic process, but also put on light these cells as potential target for attenuate fibrosis in SSc patients as we are convinced from long time [5].
A clear link between the increased presence of M2 macrophages and the development of lung fibrosis has been established by Huo et al. who demonstrated that recruited macrophages in fibrotic lungs mainly displayed an M2 phenotype and blocking pulmonary macrophage infiltration led to the attenuation of the fibrosis a bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis mouse model [41].
Additionally, Nouno et al. observed a significantly higher count of CD68+ (pan-macrophage marker), CD163+, CD204+ cells in lung biopsies from patients affected by idiopathic IPF and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) compared to control subjects [42].
A link between M2-like monocytes and lung involvement in SSc patients has also been described: in fact, in these patients, macrophage precursors (CD14+monocytes) expressing CD206 were increased and their percentage correlate with a higher pulmonary arterial pressure [43].
Moreover, circulating cells belonging to the monocyte lineage and expressing M2 macrophage markers were found to be higher in SSc patients compared to HSs and their percentage correlated with Scl70 positivity and the presence of ILD [44].
Despite the significant role of M2 macrophages in the fibrotic process of SSc, there are currently no applicable therapies in clinical practice targeting these cells for the treatment or prevention of fibrosis. In this context, Hu et al. brilliantly highlighted that cytokines (IL4, IL13), signal transducers (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and 6), and other molecules (CpG-binding domain 2, matrix metalloproteinase 28) are involved in those mechanisms leading to a M2 polarization, suggesting that they could potentially offer a therapeutic target [45].
Only two novel therapies have been recently approved for the treatment of SSc-ILD due to their demonstrated effect in reducing the decline of forced vital capacity (FVC).
Nintedanib, an intracellular tyrosine kinases inhibitor that targets various growth factors, including PDGFR, FGFRs, and VEGFRs, is one of these drugs, and its approval has been granted because of its ability to reduce the annual rate of FVC decline [46].
Of note, the relationship between nintedanib and macrophage activity has not been fully elucidated. From a preclinical perspective, Huang et al. studied the effects of nintedanib in a fos-related antigen-2 (Fra2) mouse model to determine its influence on pulmonary arterial hypertension, which is considered another significant SSc complication [22].
They observed that nintedanib, besides preventing thickening of vessel walls and inhibiting the proliferation of pulmonary vascular smooth cells and the apoptosis of microvascular endothelial cells, also blocked myofibroblast differentiation and impaired M2 polarization of monocytes, leading to a reduced count of M2 macrophages [22].
In contrast, Zhang et al. analyzed the molecular profile of lungs biopsies from patients with IPF, and no differences were detected in the presence of alveolar macrophages in lung tissue of nintedanib-treated patients compared to untreated ones [47].
In the study of Bellamri et al. nintedanib was found to target the activation of colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) by altering the effect of the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) on the phenotype of human macrophages; the inhibition of this pathway significantly decreased macrophage adhesion ability, reduced the polarization of macrophages to both M1 and M2, and inhibited the synthesis of M2 markers [48].
A possible limitation of this study is the relatively small number of enrolled patients to establish stronger statistical correlations. Furthermore, a more comprehensive analysis should be dedicated to the patients’ clinical profile, and future evaluations should consider stratifying those patients based on some clinical parameters, such as their autoantibody profiles or the degree of vascular involvement, as showed by nailfold video-capillaroscopy [49].
Conclusions
Nintedanib is shown for the first time to significantly decrease in vitro the gene and protein expression of cell membrane and functional markers of profibrotic M2 macrophages obtained from SSc patients affected by ILD.
In addition, the study showed that the treatment with nintedanib of cultured M2 macrophages significantly reduced the release of the active form of TGFβ1 growth factor, that is overexpressed in SSc patients with ILD and potentially involved in the development of lung fibrosis.
Therefore, it is reported in vitro and for the first time, that the significantly downregulatory activity exerted by nintedanib on the tyrosine kinase receptor MerTK expression might represent one of the major therapeutic effects linked to the ILD clinical improvement observed in treated SSc patients.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Change history
10 April 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03319-4
Abbreviations
- SSc:
-
Systemic Sclerosis
- ILD:
-
interstitial lung disease
- TGF-β1:
-
transforming growth factor-β1
- MDMs:
-
monocyte-derived macrophages
- ACR:
-
American College of Rheumatology
- EULAR:
-
European League Against Rheumatism
- CD204:
-
cluster of differentiation 204 (macrophage scavenger receptor 1)
- CD206:
-
cluster of differentiation 206 (mannose receptor 1 type C)
- CD163:
-
cluster of differentiation 163 (hemoglobin scavenger receptor)
- MerTK:
-
MER proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase
- IL10:
-
interleukin-10
- ELISA:
-
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- RP:
-
Raynaud’s phenomenon
- CD80:
-
cluster of differentiation 80
- CD86:
-
cluster of differentiation 86
- TLR3:
-
toll-like receptor 3
- TLR4:
-
toll-like receptor 4
- IL6:
-
interleukin-6
- CCL17:
-
CC-motif chemokine ligand-17
- CCL18:
-
CC-motif chemokine ligand-18
- CCL22:
-
CC-motif chemokine ligand-22
- IL4:
-
interleukin-4
- IL13:
-
interleukin-13
- Scl-70:
-
anti-topoisomerase-I antibodies
- IL1:
-
interleukin-1
- IL17:
-
interleukin-17
- IL33:
-
interleukin-33
- PDGFR:
-
platelet-derived growth factor receptor
- FGFRs:
-
fibroblast growth factor receptors
- VEGFRs:
-
vascular endothelial growth factor receptors
- CSF1R:
-
colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor
- IPF:
-
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- FVC:
-
forced vital capacity
- SENSCIS:
-
Safety and Efficacy of Nintedanib in Systemic Sclerosis
- HRCT:
-
high-resolution computed tomography
- EMA:
-
European Medicines Agency
- AIFA:
-
Italian drug Agency
- PBMCs:
-
peripheral blood mononuclear cells
- CD16:
-
cluster of differentiation 16
- PMA:
-
phorbol myristate acetate
- qRT-PCR:
-
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
- RNA:
-
ribonucleic acid
- GAPDH:
-
glyceraldeide-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- HRP:
-
horseradish peroxide
- lcSSC:
-
limited cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis
- dcSSc:
-
diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis
- mRSS:
-
modified Rodnan skin score
- DU:
-
digital ulcers
- PAH:
-
pulmonary arterial hypertension
- FEV1:
-
forced expiratory volume in 1 s
- DLCO:
-
diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide
- MMF:
-
mycophenolate mofetil
- PDN:
-
prednisone
- HCQ:
-
hydroxychloroquine
- MTX:
-
methotrexate
- RTX:
-
rituximab
- CYC:
-
cyclophosphamide
- Ca-A:
-
calcium antagonist
- ERA:
-
endothelin receptor antagonist
- PDE5-i:
-
phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor
- IV:
-
intravenous
- ACA:
-
anti-centromere antibodies
- CENP-A/B:
-
anti-centromere antibodies type A and B
- GI:
-
gastrointestinal
- CD68:
-
cluster of differentiation 68
- NSIP:
-
non-specific interstitial pneumonia
- CSF1:
-
colony-stimulating factor 1
- PPF:
-
progressive pulmonary fibrosis
References
Volkmann ER, Andréasson K, Smith V. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet. 2023;401:304–18.
Asano Y. The pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis: an understanding based on a Common Pathologic Cascade across multiple organs and additional organ-specific pathologies. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2687. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092687.
Cutolo M, Soldano S, Smith V. Pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis: current understanding and new insights. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019;15:753–64.
Matoo H, Bangari DS, Cummings S, Humulock Z, Habiel D, Xu EY, et al. Molecular features and stages of pulmonary fibrosis driven by type 2 inflammation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2023;69:404–21.
Al-Adwi Y, Westa J, van Goor H, Burges JK, Denton CP, Mulder DJ. Macrophages as determinants and regulators of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology. 2023;62:535–45.
Lescoat A, Lecureur V, Varga J. Contribution of monocytes and macrophages to the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis: recent insights and therapeutic implications. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2021;33:463–70.
Kania G, Rudnik M, Distler O. Involvement of the myeloid cells compartment in fibrogenesis and systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15:288–302.
Murray PJ. Macrophage polarization. Annu Rev Physiol. 2017;79:541–66.
Cutolo M, Sulli A, Barone A, Seriolo B, Accardo S. Macrophages, synovial tissue and rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1993;11:331–9.
Peng Y, Zhou M, Yang H, Qu R, Qui Y, Hao J, et al. Regulatory mechanism of M1/M2 magrophage polarization in the development of autoimmune diseases. Mediators Inflamm. 2023;82023:8821610. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8821610.
Funes SC, Rios M, Escobar-Vera J, Kalergis AM. Implications of macrophage polarization in autoimmunity. Immunology. 2018;154:186–95.
Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:958–69.
Giuseppina Stifano AJ, Affandi AL, Mathes LM, Rice S, Nakerakanti B, Nazari, et al. Chronic toll-like receptor 4 stimulation in skin induces inflammation, macrophage activation, transforming growth factor beta signature gene expression, and fibrosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:R136. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4598.
Higashi-Kuwata N, Jinnin M, Makino T, Fukushima S, Inoue Y, Muchemwa FC, et al. Characterization of monocyte/macrophage subsets in the skin and peripheral blood derived from patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:1–10.
Soldano S, Trombetta AC, Contini P, Tomatis V, Ruaro B, Brizzolara R, et al. Increase in circulating cells coexpressing M1 and M2 macrophage surface markers in patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1842–5.
Manetti M. Deciphering the alternatively activated (M2) phenotype of macrophages in scleroderma. Exp Dermatol. 2015;24:576–8.
Christmann RB, Lafyatis R. The cytokine language of monocytes and macrophages in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:13–5.
Hilberg F, Roth GJ, Krssak M, Kautschitsch S, Sommergruber W, Tontsch-Grunt U, et al. BIBF 1120: triple angiokinase inhibitor with sustained receptor blockade and good antitumor efficacy. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4774–82.
Richeldi L, du Bois RM, Raghu G, Azuma A, Brown KK, Costabel U, et al. Efficacy and safety of Nintedanib in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2071–82.
Distler O, Highland KB, Gahlemann M, Azuma A, Fischer A, Mayes MD, et al. Nintedanib for systemic sclerosis–Associated interstitial lung disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2518–28.
Atanelishvili I, Akter T, Noguchi A, Vuyiv O, Wollin L, Silver RM et al. Antifibrotic efficacy of nintedanib in a cellular model of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019;37 Suppl 119:115 – 24.
Huang J, Maier C, Zhang Y, Soare A, Dees C, Beyer C, et al. Nintedanib inhibits macrophage activation and ameliorates vascular and fibrotic manifestations in the Fra2 mouse model of systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1941–48.
Van Den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:2737–47.
Smith V, Sciré CA, Talarico R, Airo P, Alexander T, Allanore Y, et al. Systemic sclerosis: state of art on clinical practice guidelines. RMD Open. 2018;4(Suppl1):e000782. doi10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000782.
DeMizio DJ, Bernstein EJ. Detection and classification of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: a review. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019;31:553–60.
Vandecasteele E, Melsens K, Vanhaecke A, Blockmans D, Bonroy C, Carton C, et al. Incidence, prevalence and long-term progression of Goh algorithm rated interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis in two independent cohorts in flanders: a retrospective cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51:969–76.
LeRoy EC, Medsger TA. Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1573–6.
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-∆∆CT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.
Gheibi Hayat SM, Bianconi V, Pirro M, Sahebkar A. Efferocytosis: molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological perspectives. Immunol Cell Biol. 2019;97:124–33.
Mohning MP, Thomas SM, Barthel L, Mould KJ, McCubbrey AL, Frasch SC, et al. Phagocytosis of microparticles by alveolar macrophages during acute lung injury requires MerTK. Am J Physiol-Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2018;314:L69–82.
Pipitone RM, Calvaruso V, Di Marco L, Di Salvo F, Gaggianesi M, Lupo G, et al. Mer tyrosine kinase (MERTK) modulates liver fibrosis progression and hepatocellular carcinoma development. Front Immunol. 2022;13:926236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.926236.
She Y, Xu X, Yu Q, Yang X, He J, Tang XX. Elevated expression of macrophage MERTK exhibits profibrotic effects and results in defective regulation of efferocytosis function in pulmonary fibrosis. Respiratory Res. 2023;24:118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02424-3.
Zizzo G, Guerrieri J, Dittman LM, Merrill JT, Cohen PL. Circulating levels of soluble MER in lupus reflect M2c activation of monocytes/macrophages, autoantibody specificities and disease activity. Arthrit Res Therapy. 2023;15:R212. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4407.
Cai B, Dongiovanni P, Corey KE, Wang X, Shmarakov IO, Zheng Z, et al. Macrophage MerTK promotes liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2020;31:406–21.
Porte J, Jenkins G, Tatler A. Myofibroblast TGF-β activation measurement in vitro. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2299:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1382-5_6.
Cutolo M, Gotelli E, Montagna P, Tardito S, Paolino S, Pizzorni C, et al. Nintedanib downregulates the transition of cultured systemic sclerosis fibrocytes into myofibroblasts and their pro-fibrotic activity. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23:205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02555-2.
Korman B. Evolving insights into the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Transl Res. 2019;209:77–89.
Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M, Airò P, Cozzi F, Carreira PE, et al. Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1809–15.
Bhandari R, Ball MS, Martyanov V, Popovich D, Schaafsma E, Han S, et al. Profibrotic activation of human macrophages in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:1160–9.
Ladyga M, Cambridge E, Karvonen HM, Pakshir P, Wu B, Boo S, et al. Cadherin- 11-mediated adhesion of macrophages to myofibroblasts establishes a profibrotic niche of active TGF-β. Sci Signal. 2019;12:eaao3469. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aao3469.
Hou J, Shi J, Chen L, Lv Z, Chen X, Cao H, et al. M2 macrophages promote myofibroblast differentiation of LR-MSCs and are associated with pulmonary fibrogenesis. Cell Commun Signal. 2018;16:89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-018-0300-8.
Nouno T, Okamoto M, Ohnishi K, Kaieda S, Tominaga M, Zaizen Y, et al. Elevation of pulmonary CD163 + and CD204 + macrophages is associated with the clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11:4005–17.
Christmann RB, Hayes E, Pendergrass S, Padilla C, Farina G, Affandi AJ, et al. Interferon and alternative activation of monocyte/macrophages in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:1718–28.
Trombetta AC, Soldano S, Contini P, Tomatis V, Ruaro B, Paolino S, et al. A circulating cell population showing both M1 and M2 monocyte/macrophage surface markers characterizes systemic sclerosis patients with lung involvement. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):1–12.
Hu M, Yao Z, Xu L, Peng M, Deng G, Liu L, et al. M2 macrophage polarization in systemic sclerosis fibrosis: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic effects. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e16206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16206.
Bukiri H, Volkmann ER. Current advances in the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2022;64:102211doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2022.102211.
Zhang Y, Jones KD, Achtar-Zadeh N, Green G, Kukreja J, Xu B, et al. Histopathological and molecular analysis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis lungs from patients treated with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Histopathology. 2019;74:341–9.
Bellamri N, Morzadec C, Joannes A, Lecureur V, Wollin L, Jouneau S, et al. Alteration of human macrophage phenotypes by the anti-fibrotic drug nintedanib. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;72:112–23.
Cutolo M, Smith V. Detection of microvascular changes in systemic sclerosis and other rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17:665–77.
Acknowledgements
We thank Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH for providing nintedanib powder.Vanessa Smith is senior clinical investigator of the Research Foundation—Flanders (Belgium) (FWO) [1.8.029.20 N].
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MC and SS planned the study design, analyzed the results, and wrote the draft of the manuscript; MC wrote the final edition of the manuscript; SS further performed the major part of the in vitro experiments, the Western blotting and the related densitometric analysis, the ELISA assays, and the statistical analysis of the results; PM performed the qRT-PCR and contributed to the related data analysis; RC, AS, CPSP and AC enrolled the patients; AC collected clinical data, performed a part of the in vitro experiments, and drafted part of the manuscript; VS contributed to the design study, to the translational evaluation of the main results and revised the final manuscript.VS is senior clinical investigator of the Research Foundation—Flanders (Belgium) (FWO) [1.8.029.20 N].
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The in vitro study received the approval of the Ethical Committee of the Polyclinic San Martino Hospital (237REG2015, amendment number:002–28/05/2018). All enrolled SSc-ILD patients signed a written informed consent. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Use of animal or human data or tissue
The study did not involve animal use. Human samples (peripheral blood) were treated according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and clinical and demographic data reported in the manuscript are anonymized and treated according to the GDPR rules.
Competing interests
MC received a grant provided by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH for this in vitro study [377835-IT-Collaborative Research Agreement; Study number: 356917]. SS, VS, RC, EG, AC, AS, CP, SP, MC do not have any conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: the authors reported that the equal contribution statement was missing. The following statement has been added “Stefano Soldano and Vanessa Smith contributed equally to the manuscript as first authors.”
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Soldano, S., Smith, V., Montagna, P. et al. Nintedanib downregulates the profibrotic M2 phenotype in cultured monocyte-derived macrophages obtained from systemic sclerosis patients affected by interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Res Ther 26, 74 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03308-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03308-7