- Research
- Open access
- Published:
The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment on interstitial lung disease outcomes
Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 26, Article number: 124 (2024)
Abstract
Background
To determine the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and its treatment and interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
Methods
SSc patients from the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS) were included. GORD was defined as self-reported GORD symptoms, therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) and/or the presence of reflux oesophagitis diagnosed endoscopically. The impact of GORD and its treatment on ILD features (including severity and time to ILD development) and survival was evaluated.
Results
GORD was a common manifestation affecting 1539/1632 (94%) of SSc patients. GORD affected 450/469 (96%) of those with SSc-ILD cohort. In SSc-ILD, there was no relationship between the presence of GORD or its treatment and time to ILD development or ILD severity. However, GORD treatment was associated with improved survival in those with ILD (p = 0.002). Combination therapy with both a PPI and a H2RA was associated with a greater survival benefit than single agent therapy with PPI alone (HR 0.3 vs 0.5 p < 0.050 respectively).
Conclusion
GORD is a common SSc disease manifestation. While the presence or treatment of GORD does not influence the development or severity of ILD, aggressive GORD treatment, in particular with a combination of PPI and H2RA, is associated with improved survival in those with SSc-ILD.
Background
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease of the connective tissues characterised by pathologic mechanisms of vasculopathy, fibrosis and autoantibody formation [1]. The gastrointestinal system is the most commonly involved internal organ system in SSc with involvement of any area from mouth to anus [2]. Gastrointestinal (GI) disease has been reported in over 90% of patients, with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) being the most frequently described symptom [2, 3]. Some studies suggest GORD may play a role in the development of interstitial lung disease (ILD) through the process of recurrent micro-aspiration [4, 5]. The exact pathogenesis of this association is unknown; however, it has been shown that exposure of the lung epithelium to gastric contents promotes airway epithelial cell fibrosis and enhanced fibroblast proliferation. Furthermore, in animal models, chronic aspiration resulted in parenchymal fibrosis [6, 7]. In SSc, the risk of aspiration of gastric contents is high due to the combination of oesophageal dysmotility, hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and delayed gastric motility [5, 8]. As such, it is not surprising that previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between the severity of GORD measured on pH-metry and manometry and the presence and severity of ILD measured by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest and spirometry [5].
ILD is the leading cause of death in SSc [9] with some studies showing an association between the presence of GORD and /or oesophageal dysmotility and ILD [5, 10,11,12] Treatment of GORD with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) is recommended by the gastroenterological society guidelines and SSc specific guidelines [13, 14]. Whether these medications impact ILD development or progression is unknown, with studies examining the benefit of anti-reflux medications (such as PPI and H2RA) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) producing conflicting results [15,16,17,18,19] even though these medications are conditionally recommended by ILD society guidelines [20]. While some studies show a survival benefit in IPF patients prescribed anti-reflux medication (PPI or H2RA), the majority of these studies have been influenced by immortal time bias [17]. Additionally, assessment of the effect of anti-reflux medication on IPF progression has produced mixed findings [15, 18]. There is scarce literature on the impact of anti-reflux medication in SSc-ILD, with a recent large German study (n = 1931 SSc patients) showing that PPI use in SSc-ILD significantly improved overall survival and progression free survival over 5 years [21]. No other reflux treatments such as H2RA, were evaluated in the German study.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between SSc-ILD and GORD in Australian SSc patients and assess the impact of anti-reflux medications (PPI and H2RA) on outcomes and survival in SSc-ILD.
Methods
Study population
Consecutive SSc patients from the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS) were included in this analysis (Table 1). The ASCS, established in 2007, is a prospective multi-centre cohort study of risk and prognostic factors for SSc. The ASCS consists of SSc patients who fulfill the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria for SSc [22] and attend yearly screening for ILD and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Data from this cohort is collected annually and includes patient demographics, SSc disease features and patient reported outcome measures. Each participant gives consent to be part of the ASCS with ethical approval obtained from all the participating study sites.
Data collection
The following prospectively collected data from the ASCS were included in this analysis: demographic data (age and sex) and disease-related data including disease duration (defined as the time since the onset of the first non-Raynaud’s disease manifestation), disease subtype, modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), autoantibody status and disease treatment. SSc disease complications recorded included ILD, PAH, myocardial disease, myositis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, gastrointestinal symptoms, digital ulceration, and joint contractures. GORD was defined as the presence of at least one of the following criteria: patient-reported symptoms of reflux, endoscopic evidence of reflux oesophagitis and/or treatment with a PPI and/or H2RA. ILD was defined by the presence of characteristic pulmonary fibrosis on HRCT. High resolution computed tomography were undertaken in patients with clinical suspicion for ILD (including abnormalities on PFT or clinical findings consistent with ILD). ILD severity was defined by the extent of pulmonary fibrosis seen on HRCT chest and categorised as mild (fibrosis involving < 20% of the lung fields), moderate (fibrosis involving 20–30% of the lung fields) and severe (fibrosis involving > 30% of the lung fields) with the worst ever recorded severity included in this analysis. PAH was defined by right heart catheterisation according to international criteria [23]. Myositis was defined as present if all the following were recorded: (i) muscle weakness on examination;(ii) elevated creatine kinase above baseline and (iii) myopathic changes on electromyography (EMG) or evidence of muscle inflammation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or muscle biopsy. Cardiac involvement was defined as present if systolic or diastolic dysfunction was noted on TTE or if a physician had attributed the presence of conduction abnormalities to SSc. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) was defined as the presence of new diarrhoea improved by cyclical antibiotic therapy. Gastrointestinal symptoms recorded included dysphagia, diarrhoea, bloating, constipation and faecal incontinence.
Outcomes
The association between patient demographic and disease features as well as SSc complications and the presence of GORD was evaluated. In SSc-ILD patients, the relationship between the presence of GORD and ILD severity (defined as % fibrosis measured on HRCT of the chest); time to development of ILD (from onset of first non-Raynaud’s SSc disease manifestation) and impact of GORD treatment (with a PPI or combination PPI/H2RA) on survival were evaluated.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 15.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed variables and median (interquartile range (IQR)) for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and as number (percentage) for categorical variables. Differences in frequency were tested using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. For normally distributed continuous variables p-value was calculated using Students T-test. For non-normally distributed continuous variables p-value was calculated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Time to ILD development and survival were analysed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves. Multivariable analyses were performed using Cox-regression analyses adjusting for disease duration, disease subtype, ILD treatment with mycophenolate or cyclophosphamide and co-existent PAH. Propensity score analysis was performed in SSc-ILD to estimate treatment effect and reduce bias. Models were created with variables consisting of clinically significant determinants of GORD (based on expert opinion) including diffuse disease subtype, forced vital capacity (FVC) < 70%, hospitalisation and dysphagia. No variable had greater than 5% bias. Cox-regression analyses were then performed on propensity matched cohorts to investigate the effect of combination versus single agent GORD treatment on survival adjusting for ILD treatment with mycophenolate or cyclophosphamide, and co-existent PAH.
Results
Demographic and disease features by GORD status
Data from 1632 consecutive SSc patients were included in this analysis, with patient characteristics summarised in Table 1. Most patients were female (85%) with limited disease subtype (74%). Anti-centromere autoantibody positivity was seen in 46% of patients with 15% positive for anti-Scl-70 antibody.
Demographic and disease features by GORD status
GORD affected 1539 (94%) of the SSc cohort. When comparing those with GORD to those without, there was no significant difference in age, sex, disease subtype, or autoantibody profile (Supplementary Table 1). Those with GORD compared to those without GORD had a longer SSc disease duration (7.3 vs 3.8 years, p = 0.001), a higher mRSS (eight vs six, p = 0.0004), and a higher frequency of joint contractures (43% vs 25%, p = 0.0004) and digital ulceration (47% vs 26%, p < 0.0001). The was no difference in the frequency of cardiopulmonary manifestations (PAH, ILD, or myocardial involvement), myositis, or calcinosis. In terms of GI manifestations, those with GORD compared to those without GORD were more likely to report a range of other gastrointestinal manifestations including dysphagia, diarrhoea, constipation, and faecal incontinence. The presence of GORD was not associated with development of SIBO in our cohort.
Of patients with GORD, 1374 (90%) were on treatment with either a PPI or H2RA or combination therapy. Most patients with GORD used PPIs (90%) and 362 (23%) were prescribed H2RA. Three hundred and fifty-one (23%) participants were on combination therapy with both PPI and H2RA.
GORD and SSc-ILD
GORD affected 450 (96%) of the SSc-ILD cohort. When comparing participants with ILD and GORD to those without, there was no significant difference in sex or autoantibody profile (Table 2). Those with GORD compared to those without GORD were younger (47.5 vs 58.3 years, p = 0.016), had a higher mRSS (ten vs four, p = 0.0003) and a higher frequency of diffuse disease subtype (41% vs 11%, p = 0.0071), joint contractures (55% vs 32%, p = 0.046), and digital ulceration (55% vs 32%, p < 0.05). Participants with GORD were less likely to have PAH (16% vs 37%, p = 0.014). There was no significant association between GORD and the presence of ILD (66% vs 59%, p = 0.46, Supplementary Table 1), or time to ILD development (p = 0.29, See Supplementary Fig. 1). Participants with GORD were not found to have more severe ILD on HRCT (see Table 2, mild 56% vs 50%, moderate 24 vs 28%, and severe 20% vs 22% p = 0.87).
Effect of treatment of GORD on survival in SSc-ILD
In participants with GORD and ILD, 66% were prescribed single agent therapy, 27% were on combination PPI and H2RA, while 7% were not prescribed anti-reflux agents. Treatment of GORD with PPI alone was associated with significantly improved survival in participants with SSc-ILD (HR 0.5, p = 0.025, CI 0.3-0.9, see Supplementary Table 2) on univariate analysis and on multivariable analysis (HR 0.5, CI 0.3 to 0.9, p = 0.031, Table 3, Fig. 1). In participants with ILD, more aggressive GORD treatment with both H2RA and PPI was associated with improved survival over single agent therapy (HR 0.3 CI 0.2-0.7, p = 0.0013) on univariate analysis. This effect remained significant in multivariable analysis after adjusting for disease subtype, disease duration, presence of co-existent PAH, ILD severity, and treatment of ILD (HR 0.3, CI 0.2-0.6, p = 0.0009 see Table 3). Multivariable cox regression analysis using the propensity adjusted cohort also showed improved survival in participants on combination therapy compared to single agent treatment (HR 0.3, CI 0.2 to 0.5, p < 0.0001, see Supplementary Table 3).
Discussion
Our study shows that the use of anti-reflux medication for the management of GORD in SSc-ILD is associated with a survival benefit. Our findings are supported by a recent study using data from 1931 participants with SSc-ILD from the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis (DNSS). In this study, the use of PPIs was associated with an improved 5 year survival and 5 year progression free survival in participants with SSc-ILD (91% vs 71%, p < 0.0001 and 67% vs 46%, p < 0.0001 respectively) on both univariate and multivariable analysis [21]. Our study found that single agent therapy with PPI was associated with improved survival in SSc-ILD on univariate analysis (HR 0.5, p = 0.025) and multivariable analysis (HR 0.5, p = 0.031) adjusted for covariates such as disease duration, disease subtype, ILD treatment with mycophenolate or cyclophosphamide, and co-existent PAH. Additionally, we found that aggressive management of GORD in SSc-ILD (with combination PPI and H2RA) was associated with improved survival compared to single agent therapy with PPI alone. Studies have shown that maximal dose PPI is unable to fully control GORD in 50-60% of SSc patients [24, 25]. There are also a number of studies which show that addition of H2RA to high dose PPI in the general population improves suppression of intragastric acid (defined as pH > 4) particularly overnight [26, 27]. It is therefore plausible that the addition of H2RA to PPI therapy can improve GORD control in SSc patients, (particularly overnight during prolonged periods in the supine position), thereby reducing micro aspiration and resulting in the improved survival seen in those prescribed dual therapy.
In our cohort, GORD was not associated with an increased risk of ILD development or severity. When looking at the association between GORD and SSc-ILD, the literature is conflicting, possibly due to the differences in how GORD is defined. While some studies use imaging modalities or motility studies to diagnose GORD, other studies rely on patient reported symptoms. Several studies where GORD is defined through motility studies or the presence of oesophageal dilatation on HRCT scan, demonstrate an association between GORD and SSc-ILD [5, 10,11,12] A recently published post-hoc analysis of the Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS) II examined the association between patient reported reflux symptoms and ILD severity defined by FVC or radiographic measures [28]. This study found that the severity of reported reflux symptoms (as measured by the UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire) was not associated with ILD severity at baseline but did significantly correlate with radiographic progression over 2 years. Additionally, the results presented by Kreuter et al. [21], using data from 1931 participants with SSc-ILD, found that the presence of GORD (defined by patient reported symptoms) was not associated with worse 5 year survival (79% vs 83%, p = 0.36) or worse progression free survival (62% vs 68%, p = 0.57), as was seen in our analysis. Our definition of GORD was based primarily on patient reported symptoms, endoscopic findings and the use of GORD therapy. As studies show that many SSc patients have evidence of dysmotility or acid reflux on manometry in the absence of symptoms [12], it is possible these patients were not included in our analysis. As we used the worst-ever reported ILD scores for our analysis, we are unable to comment on the relationship between reflux severity and ILD progression.
The treatment of GORD (with PPI or combination of PPI and H2RA) was not associated with delayed ILD development in our SSc cohort. This finding is consistent with a recently published study of 798 Canadian SSc patients followed over 4.4Â years [29], where patients exposed to gastroprotective agents did not have a lower incidence of ILD over the follow up period compared to the unexposed population. Asymptomatic oesophageal dysmotility is often present early in the SSc disease course and occasionally prior to SSc diagnosis [11, 12]. Therefore, the lack of observed effect of reflux treatment on development of SSc-ILD may be due to the accumulated damage from aspiration prior to GORD diagnosis and initiation of its treatment.
The evidence for use of anti-reflux therapy to improve survival or delay ILD disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is mixed [15,16,17,18,19]. One recent study of patients in an Australian IPF registry found that neither GORD severity nor use of PPI/ H2RA improved survival or delayed disease progression [15]. This study boasted large patient numbers (n = 684) and long follow up (median 2.2 years). However, while 65% of patients were taking PPI/H2RA, only 41% had a diagnosis of GORD, which is in contrast to our study.
Increasing awareness of the potential adverse effects of PPIs has led to some uncertainty about their use in SSc [8]. A recent review article discussed the difficulties in balancing the benefit of PPI use in SSc with potential adverse effects. The most common side effects reported with PPI use are osteoporosis, hypomagnesemia and atrophic gastritis [8]. While the use of PPIs has been associated with development of SIBO in SSc, due to decreased acidity of gastric contents, we did not find PPI use to be associated with development of SIBO in our cohort [30]. This may be due to the low numbers of participants reported to have SIBO in our cohort (3.2%). Additionally, due to the low numbers of participants not treated with PPI (17% overall), we cannot ascertain the association between PPI use and the adverse effects listed above in our cohort. Whilst we are not recommending the empiric use of anti-reflux therapy in all SSc patients, we are highlighting that in those with GORD and SSc-ILD, the treatment of GORD with PPI or combination PPI/H2RA is associated with improved survival, and in this context, benefits of treatment may outweigh potential risks. We acknowledge that the H2RA ranitidine has been withdrawn from the market due to the presence of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). However, other H2RA such as nizatidine remain available.
Strengths of our study include the large well characterised SSc cohort, with data from 1640 participants undergoing yearly screening for SSc-ILD. Limitation of our study include immortal time bias, as patients who live longer are more likely to have been prescribed anti-reflux medication; some missing data; and the inability to ascertain the dosage of anti-reflux medication used or participants’ compliance with treatment. As the practice of Australian physicians is generally to optimise PPI therapy in SSc prior to initiation of H2RA (in the absence of contra-indications), participants on combination therapy may have been prescribed higher doses of PPI than participants on PPI alone. Additionally, we do not routinely perform manometry or endoscopy in Australian SSc patients; therefore, participants with asymptomatic dysmotility or reflux would not have been included in our GORD population. However, some patient may have been diagnosed incidentally on gastroscopy performed for other indications.
Conclusion
GORD is a common complication in SSc, affecting 94% of Australian SSc patients. Treatment of GORD with either PPI or combination PPI/H2RA has the potential to improve survival in those with SSc-ILD.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ACR:
-
American College of Rheumatology
- ASCS:
-
Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- EMG:
-
Electromyography
- EULAR:
-
European League Against Rheumatism or European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology
- FVC:
-
Forced vital capacity
- GI:
-
Gastrointestinal
- GIT:
-
Gastrointestinal tract
- GORD:
-
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
- H2RA:
-
Histamine receptor antagonist
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- HRCT:
-
High resolution computed tomography
- ILD:
-
Interstitial lung disease
- IPF:
-
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- K-M:
-
Kaplan:Meier
- LES:
-
Lower oesophageal sphincter
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- mRSS:
-
Modified Rodnan skin score
- PAH:
-
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
- PFTs:
-
Pulmonary function tests
- PPI:
-
Proton pump inhibitor
- SIBO:
-
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth
- SSc:
-
Systemic Sclerosis
- TTE:
-
Transthoracic echocardiography
- UCLA:
-
University of California and Los Angeles
References
Gu YS, Kong J, Cheema GS, Keen CL, Wick G, Gershwin ME. The immunobiology of systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2008;38(2):132–60.
Ebert EC. Gastric and enteric involvement in progressive systemic sclerosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(1):5–12.
Li B, Yan J, Pu J, Tang J, Xu S, Wang X. Esophageal dysfunction in systemic sclerosis: an update. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8(4):1535–49.
Nihtyanova SI, Denton CP. Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2020;5(2_suppl):6–16.
Savarino E, Bazzica M, Zentilin P, Pohl D, Parodi A, Cittadini G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary fibrosis in scleroderma: a study using pH-impedance monitoring. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(5):408–13.
Lee JS. The role of gastroesophageal reflux and microaspiration in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Clin Pulm Med. 2014;21(2):81–5.
Christmann RB, Wells AU, Capelozzi VL, Silver RM. Gastroesophageal reflux incites interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: clinical, radiologic, histopathologic, and treatment evidence. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010;40(3):241–9.
Hughes M, Allanore Y, Baron M, Del Galdo F, Denton CP, Frech T, et al. Proton pump inhibitors in systemic sclerosis: a reappraisal to optimise treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022;4(11):795–803.
Volkmann ER, Fischer A. Update on morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2021;6(1):11–20.
Winstone TA, Hague CJ, Soon J, Sulaiman N, Murphy D, Leipsic J, et al. Oesophageal diameter is associated with severity but not progression of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Respirology. 2018;23(10):921–6.
Lepri G, Guiducci S, Bellando-Randone S, Giani I, Bruni C, Blagojevic J, et al. Evidence for oesophageal and anorectal involvement in very early systemic sclerosis (VEDOSS): report from a single VEDOSS/EUSTAR centre. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(1):124–8.
Vettori S, Tolone S, Capocotta D, Chieffo R, Giacco V, Valentini G, et al. Esophageal high-resolution impedance manometry alterations in asymptomatic patients with systemic sclerosis: prevalence, associations with disease features, and prognostic value. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37(5):1239–47.
Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ. ACG clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Official J Am College Gastroenterol. 2022;117(1):27–56.
Hansi N, Thoua N, Carulli M, Chakravarty K, Lal S, Smyth A, et al. Consensus best practice pathway of the UK scleroderma study group: gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(6 Suppl 86):214–21.
Jo HE, Corte TJ, Glaspole I, Grainge C, Hopkins PMA, Moodley Y, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and antacid therapy in IPF: analysis from the Australia IPF Registry. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19(1):84.
Yang M, Dong J, An J, Liu L, Chen L. Effect of anti-reflux therapy on pulmonary function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(10):5776–87.
Tran T, Assayag D, Ernst P, Suissa S. Effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a population-based cohort study. Chest. 2021;159(2):673–82.
Lee JS, Collard HR, Anstrom KJ, Martinez FJ, Noth I, Roberts RS, et al. Anti-acid treatment and disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an analysis of data from three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1(5):369–76.
Lee CM, Lee DH, Ahn BK, Hwang JJ, Yoon H, Shin CM, et al. Protective effect of proton pump inhibitor for survival in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(3):444–51.
Raghu G, Rochwerg B, Zhang Y, Garcia CAC, Azuma A, Behr J, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline: treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An update of the 2011 clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(2):e3–19.
Kreuter M, Bonella F, Blank N, Riemekasten G, Müller-Ladner U, Henes J, et al. Anti-acid therapy in SSc-associated interstitial lung disease: long-term outcomes from the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis. Rheumatology. 2023;62(9):3067–74.
van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(11):1747–55.
Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery J-L, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Kardiol Pol (Polish Heart Journal). 2015;73(12):1127–206.
Foocharoen C, Chunlertrith K, Mairiang P, Mahakkanukrauh A, Suwannaroj S, Namvijit S, et al. Prevalence and predictors of proton pump inhibitor partial response in gastroesophageal reflux disease in systemic sclerosis: a prospective study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–9.
Stern EK, Carlson DA, Falmagne S, Hoffmann AD, Carns M, Pandolfino JE, et al. Abnormal esophageal acid exposure on high-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy is common in systemic sclerosis patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(2):02.
Abdul-Hussein M, Freeman J, Castell D. Concomitant administration of a histamine2 receptor antagonist and proton pump inhibitor enhances gastric acid suppression. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(12):1124–9.
Mainie I, Tutuian R, Castell DO. Addition of a H2 receptor antagonist to PPI improves acid control and decreases nocturnal acid breakthrough. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(6):676–9.
Volkmann ER, Tashkin DP, Leng M, Kim GH, Goldin J, Roth MD. Association of Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux, Esophageal Dilation, and Progression of Systemic Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease. Arthritis Care Res. 2023;75(8):1690–7.
Hurtubise R, Hudson M, Gyger G, Wang M, Steele RJ, Baron M, et al. Association between gastroprotective agents and risk of incident interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Respir Med. 2021;185:106482.
Lo WK, Chan WW. Proton pump inhibitor use and the risk of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(5):483–90.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
AQ is supported by the Harrison Pennicott scholarship provided by the University of Melbourne. LR is supported by the RACP Australian Rheumatology Association & D.E.V. Starr Research Establishment Fellowship. KM holds a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Investigator Grant (GTN 1197169). MN is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Investigator Grant (GNT 1176538). The Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Scleroderma Australia, Scleroderma Victoria, Arthritis Australia, Australian Rheumatology Association, Musculoskeletal Australia, The Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC), St Vincent’s Hospital Research Endowment Fund, philanthropic donations, Janssen and Boehringer Ingelheim.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AQ: study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. DN: data analysis, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. DH: data analysis, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. WS: study design, data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. LR: study design, data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. NF: study design, data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. SP: study design, data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. JW: data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. JS: data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. GN: data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. DA: data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. LH: data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. LH: data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. GM: data collection, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. CB: interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript KM: study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. MN: study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, preparation of manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Each participant gives consent to be part of the ASCS with ethical approval obtained St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Ethics Committee (LRR 012/21).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Quinlivan, A., Neuen, D., Hansen, D. et al. The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment on interstitial lung disease outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther 26, 124 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03355-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03355-0