Skip to main content

The Relationship between the complement system and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Background

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and CV mortality. Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis is independently associated with rates of incident CV events among patients with RA. The complement system has been related to both the etiopathogenesis of RA and CV disease. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between a comprehensive assessment of the complement system and carotid intima media thickness and carotid plaque in patients with RA.

Methods

430 patients with RA were recruited. Functional assays of the three pathways of the complement system, utilizing new-generation techniques, were assessed. Additionally, serum levels of individual components of the complement system belonging to the three pathways were measured: C1q (classical), lectin (lectin), C2, C4, and C4b (classical and lectin), factor D and properdin (alternative), C3 and C3a (common), C5, C5a, and C9 (terminal), as well as regulators factor I and C1-inhibitor. Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis was evaluated by ultrasonography. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association between the complement system and carotid intima media thickness and carotid plaque.

Results

After multivariable adjustment, which included traditional CV risk factors and disease-related data, C3a and C5a exhibited significant positive correlations with carotid intima media thickness. Additionally, higher values of C1-inhibitor, properdin, C3, C5, and C5a were independently associated with the presence of carotid plaque.

Conclusion

The complement system and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis are linked in patients with RA.

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory peripheral polyarthritis characterized by symmetric joint involvement. It often results in joint damage by eroding cartilage and bone. Additionally, individuals with RA have a higher incidence of atherosclerosis compared to those without the condition [1], resulting in an elevated incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events such as stroke, myocardial infarctions, and cardiac deaths when compared to the general population [2, 3]. It is known that in addition to the traditional CV risk factors, the presence of chronic inflammation can explain the development of accelerated atherosclerosis in these patients [4] through effects mediated by cytokines, immune complexes and endothelial dysfunction, or by a combination of these factors [1, 5,6,7]. Besides, higher prevalence of carotid subclinical atherosclerosis has been described in RA patients [8], and the presence of carotid plaques predicts the development of CV events and death in patients with RA [9].

The complement system plays a crucial role in the innate immune response, working alongside antibody-mediated processes. Comprising around 60 proteins found in both plasma and cell membranes, this system consists of three interconnected activation pathways: the classical, alternative, and lectin cascades. Additionally, there is a shared terminal lytic pathway and a complex network of regulators and receptors [10]. Each pathway is triggered by distinct mechanisms, yet all converge to activate C3 and deposit it as C3b, a central event in complement activation. The classical pathway is initiated by antibodies, whereas the lectin pathway rapidly identifies repetitive carbohydrate patterns on microbial pathogens’ surfaces. In contrast, the alternative pathway acts as an ancient surveillance system, representing the original extracellular complement pathway. It can be activated independently of antibodies or lectins and operates continuously at a low level, facilitated by the presence of a labile thioester bond at C3, a phenomenon known as “tick-over.”

The complement system has been linked to the etiopathogenesis of RA. In this sense, in individuals with RA, a diverse range of autoantibodies is present, some of which can bind to antigens found within the joints. This binding process leads to the formation of immune complexes within the inflamed synovial tissue (pannus) and cartilage, subsequently triggering complement activation and consumption of complement components [11]. Consequently, activation products such as C1 inhibitor-C1r-C1s complexes, C2a, C3a, C3d or C3dg, and C5a have been observed at elevated levels in synovial fluid [12], and complement deposition can be visualized in synovial tissue through immunohistochemical staining [13].

In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the complement system, including functional tests of its three pathways and the assessment of serum complement elements from both upstream and downstream of the system. Additionally, carotid ultrasound was performed to determine the presence of carotid plaque and carotid intima-media wall thickness (cIMT). Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between the complement system and the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in a large series of patients with RA, considering the presence of traditional CV risk factors.

Materials and methods

Study participants

Cross-sectional study that included 430 patients with RA recruited consecutively from 2019 to 2021. All participants were 18 years old or older and met the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria [14]. They had been diagnosed by rheumatologists and were undergoing regular follow-up appointments at rheumatology outpatient clinics. To be included in the present study, participants were required to have a duration of RA disease of at least one year. As glucocorticoids are frequently utilized in RA treatment, patients receiving prednisone or an equivalent dose of ≤ 10 mg/day were eligible for participation in the study. Patients with a history of cancer, hypothyroidism, nephrotic syndrome, as well as those displaying evidence of active infection, were excluded from the study. Additionally, having had a previous CV event was an exclusion criterion for inclusion in this study. A flowchart illustrating the excluded and included patients is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Committee at Hospital Universitario de Canarias and at Hospital Universitario Doctor Negrín (both in Spain), and all subjects provided informed written consent (approval no. 2019-452-1). All research activities were carried out in strict compliance with applicable guidelines and regulations, and in accordance with the principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data collection, laboratory assessments and carotid ultrasound evaluation

Participants enrolled in the study underwent a comprehensive examination, which included completing a questionnaire regarding CV risk factors and medication usage. A thorough physical examination was conducted, which involved measurements such as body-mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters, abdominal circumference, and assessment of systolic and diastolic blood pressure under standardized conditions. Additionally, information regarding smoking, diabetes, and hypertension was gathered. Specific diagnoses and medication details were verified through a review of medical records. Cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-cholesterol were measured using the enzymatic colorimetric assay. LDL-cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Dyslipidemia was defined if one of the following was present: total cholesterol > 200 mg/dL, triglycerides > 150 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol < 40 in men or < 50 mg/dL in women, or LDL cholesterol > 130 mg/dL. A standard technique was used to measure the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP). Disease activity in patients with RA was measured using the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) in 28 joints [15] using both ESR (DAS28-ESR) and CRP (DAS28-CRP) in its calculation, the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) [16] and the Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) [17].

Complement assessments

The SVAR functional complement assays under the Wieslab® brand (Sweden) were used to assess classical, alternative and lectin pathways activity. These tests combine principles from the hemolytic assay for complement function with the use of labeled antibodies that specifically target the neoantigen produced as a result of complement activation. The quantity of neoantigen generated is directly proportional to the functional activity of the complement pathways. Microtiter strip wells are coated with classical, alternative or lectin pathway-specific activators. In this process, the patient’s serum is diluted with a specific blocker to ensure activation of only the studied complement pathway. During the incubation of the diluted patient serum in the wells, the specific coating activates C. Subsequently, the wells are washed, and the presence of C5b-9 is detected using an alkaline phosphatase-labeled specific antibody against the neoantigen expressed during membrane attack complex (MAC) formation. Following an additional washing step, specific antibodies are detected by incubating with an alkaline phosphatase substrate solution. The intensity of the color developed correlates with the amount of complement activation and is measured in terms of absorbance (optical density). The quantity of formed Membrane Attack Complex (MAC) neo-epitope reflects the activity of the complement cascade. The result is expressed semi-quantitatively by calculating the optical density ratio between a positive control and the sample. It is crucial to note that for the classical, alternative, and lectin cascade values, lower levels indicate a higher activation of the respective pathway. Wieslab® has validated these functional assays by studying their correlation and concordance with the classical CH50 and AH50 hemolytic tests (https://www.svarlifescience.com/). Additionally, complement individual elements were assessed through MILLIPLEX® map Multiplex Detection (MERCK®, Cat. No. HCMP1MAG-19 K and No. HCMP2MAG-19 K). To achieve a comprehensive characterization of all complement pathways, panels were devised to evaluate various components, including C1q (classical pathway), lectin (lectin pathway), C1 inhibitor, C2, C4, and C4b (classical and lectin pathways), factor D and properdin (alternative pathway), C3, C3a, and factor I (common pathway), as well as C5, C5a, and C9 (terminal pathway). Both intra- and inter-coefficients of variability for these assays were maintained below 10%.

Carotid ultrasound assessment

Carotid ultrasound examination was used to assess cIMT in the common carotid artery and to detect focal plaques in the extracranial carotid tree in patients with RA [18]. A commercially available scanner, the EsaoteMylab 70 (Genoa, Italy), equipped with a 7–12 MHz linear transducer and using an automated software-guided radiofrequency technique —Quality Intima Media Thickness in real-time (QIMT, Esaote, Maastricht, Holland)— was used for this purpose. cIMT value represents the maximum thickness from 3 measurements on each side. As previously reported [18], based on the Mannheim consensus, plaque criteria in the accessible extracranial carotid tree (common carotid artery, bulb, and internal carotid artery) were defined as follows: a focal protrusion in the lumen measuring at least cIMT > 1.5 mm; a protrusion at least 50% greater than the surrounding cIMT; or arterial lumen encroaching > 0.5 mm [19].

Statistical analysis

Demographic and clinical characteristics in patients with RA were described using means (standard deviation) or percentages for categorical variables. For non-normally distributed continuous variables, data were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). The association between subclinical atherosclerosis and circulating complement system molecules and pathways was analyzed through multivariable linear and logistic regression analysis using complement system routes and elements, and carotid ultrasounds, respectively, as the independent and dependent variable, while adjusting for covariates. For the construction of a heatmap of multivariable associations, standardized beta coefficients were calculated and plotted. Using standardized beta coefficients, rather than non-standardized ones, facilitates comparison between beta coefficients in multiple associations. Covariates for the multivariable regression analysis were selected from demographic and disease-related data that exhibited a relationship with cIMT or carotid plaque with a p-value below 0.20. All analyses were conducted with a 5% two-sided significance level using Stata software, version 17/BE (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Heatmap graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism version 10, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA.

Results

Demographic and disease-related data

This study included a total of 430 patients diagnosed with RA. Demographic- and disease-related characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. The study population had a mean age of 55 ± 10 years, with 81% of the participants being women. Traditional CV risk factors were prevalent. In this sense, 34% had hypertension, 13% were diabetic, and 22% were smoking at the time the study was performed. The median duration of the disease was 8 years (interquartile range, IQR, 4–15). At the time of the study, the mean values of CRP and ESR were 2.7 mg/l (IQR 1.3–6.1) and 18 mm/1st hour (IQR 7–32), respectively. Rheumatoid factor was positive in 72% of patients, and 65% were positive for anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies (ACPA). The disease activity, as measured by DAS28-ESR, was 3.1 ± 1.4. According to this score, 40% of the patients met the criteria for remission, while 18% and 42% were categorized in the low and moderate/high disease activity groups, respectively. The DAS28-CRP had a value of 2.7 ± 1.1, and SDAI and CDAI were 12 (IQR 7–19) and 8 (IQR 4–14), respectively. 36% of the patients were undergoing treatment with prednisone, while 87% were receiving at least one conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) of any type, with methotrexate being the most commonly prescribed (73%). 19% of the patients were receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies. Carotid plaque was present in 180 (42%) of the patients, and cIMT had a value of 696 ± 131 microns. The frequency of usage of other treatments and historical disease-related data can be found in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographics and disease related data in RA patients

Functional complement assays of the classical, alternative and lectin pathways, and single complement components, C1q, C1-inhibitor, C2, C4, C4b, C3, C3a, C5, C5a, and C9, and factor D and I, properdin and lectin serum values are presented in Supplementary Table 1.

Univariable and multivariable analysis of the relationship between complement system and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis

The relation of the complement system to carotid ultrasound evaluation is expressed in Fig. 1 as standardized beta coefficients, considering the complement system and carotid assessment as, respectively, the independent and dependent variables. Standardized beta coefficients provide a measure of the strength and direction of the relationship between variables when they are expressed in different units or scales. In this regard, standardizing the coefficients allows for comparisons by bringing all variables to a common scale.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Heatmap of the relationship between complement system and carotid ultrasound assessment. Values in the cells represent multivariable standardized beta coefficients of the association between complement system (independent variable) and carotid intima media thickness (A) and carotid plaque (B) (dependent variables). Model 1 is adjusted for demographics and traditional cardiovascular factors, and Model 2 for Model 1 + disease related data. CL: classical, LE: lectin, AL: alternative, fI: factor I, fD: factor D. Significant correlation and standardized beta coefficients with a p < 0.05 are depicted as *

Concerning cIMT, many positive associations (red in the heatmap) disclosed statistical significance in the univariable analysis. In this sense, C1q that represents an upstream molecule of the classical route, factor D and properdin of the alternative cascade, as well as C4b of the lectin and classical pathways, showed a positive and significant relation to cIMT. This was also the case for C3a and factor I of the common route, and C5 and C5a of the terminal cascade. After multivariable analysis that included demographics and traditional CV factors such as age, sex, abdominal circumference, hypertension, type 2 diabetes and the use of statins (Model #1 in Fig. 1-A), many significant associations were lost (red color decreased in the heatmap). Only C5a maintained a significant and positive relation to cIMT.

Due to potential influences from disease activity, medications used in treatment, and various other factors related to the disease, we conducted an additional multivariable linear regression analysis adjusting for rheumatoid factor and the use of NSAIDs, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine and anti-TNF alpha therapies (Model #2 in Fig. 1-A). Remarkably, C3a and C5a continued to exhibit a positive and significant relation to cIMT after this full multivariable adjustment.

The analysis of the relation between complement system and carotid plaque yielded similar results to the ones of cIMT in the univariable analysis (Fig. 1-B). However, after adjustment for age, sex, abdominal circumference, hypertension, diabetes, the use of statins (Model #1 in Fig. 1-B), and disease duration, ESR, ACPA positivity and the utilization of NSAIDs and hydroxychloroquine (Model #2 in Fig. 1-B), a higher frequency of significant relations between the complement system and carotid plaque were found. In this regard, after this comprehensive adjustment, properdin of the alternative route, C1-inhibitor of the classical and lectin cascades, C3 of the common pathway, and C5 and C5a of the terminal, maintained a significant and positive association with the presence of carotid plaque (Fig. 1-B).

Additionally, non-standardized beta coefficients and odds ratios of the relation of complement system to cIMT and carotid plaque are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Non-standardized beta coefficients of the relation of complement system to subclinical carotid atherosclerosis

Discussion

Our study is the first to date to investigate the relationship between a comprehensive analysis of the complement system and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in a large series of patients with RA. This has been performed including functionally assessment of three pathways of the complement system and by measuring the concentration of several upstream and downstream complement elements. Moreover, we have applied a fully multivariable adjustment that included traditional CV risk factors and disease-related data. Our results support a link between the complement system and the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in patients with RA and suggest a potential influence of complement in the development of atherosclerotic disease in these patients.

A relatively large body of data has been published regarding the role of the complement system in CV disease in general population [20]. This evidence comes from both prospective clinical studies and those based on genetic polymorphisms and anatomopathological findings. With respect to this, a study comprising 188 heart failure patients and 67 healthy controls matched for age and sex examined properdin, factor D, the alternative pathway inhibitor factor H, and the activation product, terminal complement complex [21]. Patients with heart failure had significantly increased levels of factor D and terminal complement complex, and decreased levels of properdin. Levels of factor D and properdin were correlated with measures of systemic inflammation, cardiac function, and deteriorated diastolic function. The authors concluded that dysregulation of circulating components of the alternative pathway explains the increased degree of complement activation, which is associated with disease severity in heart failure patients [21]. In another study that included a cohort of 389 men spanning a spectrum of risk who were referred for coronary angiography, a single baseline measurement of serum complement C4 level emerged as an independent predictor for the subsequent development of stroke [22]. This was also the case in a population-based prospective study of 5850 initially healthy men. In this study, both C3 and C4 displayed significant correlations with CV risk factors, such as blood pressure, BMI, and lipids. Elevated C4 levels were linked to CV disease incidence, regardless of traditional CV risk factors [23]. Other studies disclosed that high circulating levels of C3 and C3a are associated with an increased cIMT [24], peripheral artery disease [25], renal arteriolosclerosis in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease [26], and increased risk of myocardial infarction [27]. In RA, a disease associated increased cIMT and carotid plaques, which are surrogate markers of atherosclerotic CV disease [28], our findings indicate that the complement system appears to play a role in the CV disease of RA patients.

Histological studies have studied the association of the complement system with CV disease. Specifically, the assessment involved measuring the quantity of C1q expression at different stages of atherosclerosis through techniques such as immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and real-time polymerase chain reaction, using abdominal aortas obtained from autopsy cases. Interestingly, C1q immunoreactivity was localized in the extracellular matrix, necrotic cores, macrophages and smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic lesions, and western blotting and real-time polymerase chain reaction showed that C1q protein and mRNA expression was significantly higher in advanced lesions than in early lesions [29].

Genetic evidence has also linked the complement system and CV disease. For example, deficiency in the classical pathway component C2 predisposes individuals to an increased risk of myocardial infarction, potentially due to decreased classical pathway-mediated clearance of immune complexes [30]. Similarly, in a randomized, controlled trial, 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CR1 gene (which encodes complement receptor 1) were associated with the risk of incident coronary artery disease [31].

Based on our study findings and the heatmap representation we generated, it appears that the association of the complement system with cIMT and carotid plaque corresponds to components of the complement located in the common and terminal pathways, including downstream activated particles. This trend was also observed in the healthy population. In this regard, elevated plasma levels of C5 were found to be associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, plaque volume, and coronary calcification in two distinct cohorts [32]. Furthermore, increased plasma levels of C5a were linked to higher CV risk in patients with advanced atherosclerosis [33].

Distinct pathophysiological mechanisms contribute to the formation of carotid plaque and cIMT. Unlike cIMT, carotid plaque primarily consists of intimal thickening characterized by the presence of foam cells, smooth muscle cells, macrophages, a lipid core, and a fibrous cap, which vary depending on the stage of plaque development [34]. Given that both processes involve distinct pathophysiological mechanisms, it could be hypothesized that they also exhibit distinct patterns of association with the complement system. This fact may explain why the pattern of complement molecules associated with cIMT and carotid plaque displays in our study differences in certain aspects.

In our work, we observed numerous univariable relationships with several complement components. However, many of these associations were attenuated following multivariable analysis. The complement system has been closely linked to various cardiometabolic comorbidities, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, and fatty liver disease [35]. However, although traditional CV risk factors may have acted as confounding variables in the relationship between the complement system and carotid evaluation, it is worth noting that despite this, the complement system maintained significant associations with both cIMT and with carotid plaque in the multivariate analysis.

We acknowledge several limitations in our study. In this regard, it was cross-sectional, so causality cannot be inferred. Besides, the complement system is a dynamic cascade with multiple regulators and inhibitors, so a static picture may not accurately represent its true pathophysiology. However, it has several strengths. Specifically, it involved a comprehensive assessment of a wide range of complement molecules along with detailed phenotyping of study participants, facilitating thorough adjustment for potential confounders. Furthermore, none of the previously discussed studies were conducted in inflammatory conditions such as RA, nor did they include as comprehensive analysis of the complement system as ours. We also acknowledge that the different types of therapies used for the disease might have affected complement system values even though some of them were included in the multivariable analysis. Prospective studies will be needed to evaluate the effect of treatments on the complement system in patients with RA.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the complement system, especially its activated elements from the common and terminal pathways, is independently and positively associated with arteriosclerotic disease in patients with RA.

Data availability

The data sets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

ACPA:

Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies

BMI:

Body mass index

CDAI:

Clinical Disease Activity Index

cIMT:

Carotid intima media thickness

CRP:

C reactive protein

CV:

Cardiovascular

DAS28:

Disease Activity Score in 28 joints

DMARD:

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation

HDL:

High density lipoprotein

LDL:

Low density lipoprotein

NSAID:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

SDAI:

Simple Disease Activity Index

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor, rate

References

  1. Castañeda S, Nurmohamed MT, González-Gay MA. Cardiovascular disease in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Apr 15];30:851–69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27964792/.

  2. Wolfe F, Michaud K. The risk of myocardial infarction and pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic myocardial infarction predictors in rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort and nested case-control analysis. Arthritis Rheum [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2024 Mar 31];58:2612–21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18759273/.

  3. Aviña-Zubieta JA, Choi HK, Sadatsafavi M, Etminan M, Esdaile JM, Lacaille D. Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2024 Mar 31];59:1690–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19035419/.

  4. Gonzalez-Gay MA, Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Piñeiro A, Garcia-Porrua C, Testa A, Llorca J. High-grade C-reactive protein elevation correlates with accelerated atherogenesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [Internet]. Journal of Rheumatology. J Rheumatol; 2005 [cited 2021 Sep 4]. pp. 1219–23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15996055/.

  5. López-Mejías R, Castañeda S, González-Juanatey C, Corrales A, Ferraz-Amaro I, Genre F et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: The relevance of clinical, genetic and serological markers. Autoimmun Rev [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Apr 29];15:1013–30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27490206/.

  6. Lo Gullo A, Mandraffino G, Bagnato G, Aragona CO, Imbalzano E, D’Ascola A et al. Vitamin D Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Inflammation, Arterial Stiffness and Circulating Progenitor Cell Number. PLoS One [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2024 Jun 14];10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26241902/.

  7. Lo Gullo A, Rodríguez-Carrio J, Aragona CO, Dattilo G, Zito C, Suárez A et al. Subclinical impairment of myocardial and endothelial functionality in very early psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis patients: Association with vitamin D and inflammation. Atherosclerosis [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Jun 14];271:214–22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29524864/.

  8. Galarza-Delgado DA, Azpiri-Lopez JR, Guajardo-Jauregui N, Cardenas-de la Garza JA, Garza-Cisneros AN, Garcia-Heredia A et al. Carotid atherosclerosis in the first five years since rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis: a cross sectional study. Advances in Rheumatology [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Apr 29];63:1–7. https://advancesinrheumatology.biomedcentral.com/articles/https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-023-00319-x.

  9. Corrales A, Vegas-Revenga N, Rueda-Gotor J, Portilla V, Atienza-Mateo B, Blanco R et al. Carotid plaques as predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Results from a 5-year-prospective follow-up study. Semin Arthritis Rheum [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 9];50:1333–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32416998/.

  10. Merle NS, Church SE, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Roumenina LT. Complement System Part I - Molecular Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation. Front Immunol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Aug 27];6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26082779/.

  11. Sturfelt G, Truedsson L. Complement in the immunopathogenesis of rheumatic disease. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2012 8:8 [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 Mar 31];8:458–68. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrrheum.2012.75.

  12. Okroj M, Heinegård D, Holmdahl R, Blom AM. Rheumatoid arthritis and the complement system. Ann Med [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2024 Apr 15];39:517–30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17852027/.

  13. Konttinen YT, Čeponis A, Meri S, Vuorikoski A, Kortekangas P, Sorsa T et al. Complement in acute and chronic arthritides: assessment of C3c, C9, and protectin (CD59) in synovial membrane. Ann Rheum Dis [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2024 Apr 15];55:888–94. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9014582/.

  14. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative [Internet]. Ann Rheum Dis. Ann Rheum Dis; 2010 [cited 2022 May 30]. pp. 1580–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20699241/.

  15. Prevoo MLL, Van ’T, Hof MA, Kuper HH, Van Leeuwen MA, Van De Putte LBA, Van Riel PLCM. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight‐joint counts development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2019 Jul 3];38:44–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7818570.

  16. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Schiff MH, Kalden JR, Emery P, Eberl G et al. A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2018 Nov 10];42:244–57. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12595618.

  17. Aletaha D, Smolen J. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 3];23:S100-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16273793.

  18. Corrales A, González-Juanatey C, Peiró ME, Blanco R, Llorca J, González-Gay MA. Carotid ultrasound is useful for the cardiovascular risk stratification of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Jan 1];73:722–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23505241/.

  19. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 Jun 13];34:290–6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23128470/.

  20. Maffia P, Mauro C, Case A, Kemper C. Canonical and non-canonical roles of complement in atherosclerosis. Nature Reviews Cardiology 2024 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 May 1];1–19. https://www-nature-com.accedys2.bbtk.ull.es/articles/s41569-024-01016-y.

  21. Shahini N, Michelsen AE, Nilsson PH, Ekholt K, Gullestad L, Broch K et al. The alternative complement pathway is dysregulated in patients with chronic heart failure. Scientific Reports 2017 7:1 [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 May 1];7:1–10. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep42532.

  22. Cavusoglu E, Eng C, Chopra V, Ruwende C, Yanamadala S, Clark LT et al. Usefulness of the serum complement component C4 as a predictor of stroke in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease referred for coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2024 May 1];100:164–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17631062/.

  23. Engström G, Hedblad bo, Janzon L, Lindgärde F. Complement C3 and C4 in plasma and incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2024 May 1];14:392–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17568238/.

  24. Jylhävä J, Eklund C, Pessi T, Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Kähönen M et al. Genetics of C-reactive protein and complement factor H have an epistatic effect on carotid artery compliance: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Clin Exp Immunol [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2024 May 1];155:53–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19076828/.

  25. Fehérvári M, Krepuska M, Széplaki G, Apor A, Sótonyi P, Prohászka Z et al. The level of complement C3 is associated with the severity of atherosclerosis but not with arterial calcification in peripheral artery disease. Int Angiol [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2024 May 1];33:35–41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24452084/.

  26. Kojima C, Takei T, Ogawa T, Nitta K. Serum complement C3 predicts renal arteriolosclerosis in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. J Atheroscler Thromb [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 May 1];19:854–61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22863782/.

  27. Muscari A, Bozzoli C, Puddu GM, Sangiorgi Z, Dormi A, Rovinetti C et al. Association of serum C3 levels with the risk of myocardial infarction. Am J Med [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2024 May 1];98:357–64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7709948/.

  28. Gonzalez-Gay MA, Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Martin J, Llorca J. Endothelial dysfunction, carotid intima-media thickness, and accelerated atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2024 May 6];38:67–70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18395772/.

  29. Sasaki S, Nishihira K, Yamashita A, Fujii T, Onoue K, Saito Y et al. Involvement of enhanced expression of classical complement C1q in atherosclerosis progression and plaque instability: C1q as an indicator of clinical outcome. PLoS One [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 May 1];17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35085285/.

  30. Jönsson G, Truedsson L, Sturfelt G, Oxelius VA, Braconier JH, Sjöholm AG. Hereditary C2 deficiency in Sweden: frequent occurrence of invasive infection, atherosclerosis, and rheumatic disease. Medicine [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2024 May 1];84:23–34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15643297/.

  31. de Vries MA, Trompet S, Mooijaart SP, Smit RAJ, Böhringer S, Castro Cabezas M et al. Complement receptor 1 gene polymorphisms are associated with cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 May 1];257:16–21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28033544/.

  32. Martínez-López D, Roldan-Montero R, García-Marqués F, Nuñez E, Jorge I, Camafeita E et al. Complement C5 Protein as a Marker of Subclinical Atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 May 1];75:1926–41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32327104/.

  33. Speidl WS, Exner M, Amighi J, Kastl SP, Zorn G, Maurer G et al. Complement component C5a predicts future cardiovascular events in patients with advanced atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2024 May 1];26:2294–9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15917276/.

  34. Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaque in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:1025–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hertle E, Stehouwer CDA, van Greevenbroek MMJ. The complement system in human cardiometabolic disease. Mol Immunol [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2024 May 1];61:135–48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25017306/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study has been funded by a grant to IF-A by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project PI20/00084 and co-funded by the European Union. Prof. Miguel Ángel González-Gay’s research was supported by the Spanish Red de Investigación RICORS RD21/0002/0025 of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IFA, MAGG: Conception, design and interpretation of the data; MHD, DRG, HER, FGB, JCQA, AFGR, EGL, JGOV, AJS: Adquisition of the data. All the authors have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Miguel Ángel González-Gay or Iván Ferraz-Amaro.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review committees at Hospital Universitario de Canarias and Hospital Universitario Doctor Negrín, and all subjects provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests related to this study. Nevertheless, Professor MA Gonzalez-Gay and Dr. Iván Ferraz-Amaro would like to acknowledge that they have received grants/research supports from Abbott, MSD, Jansen and Roche, as well as consultation fees from company-sponsored speakers bureaus associated with Abbott, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Celgene and MSD.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Díaz, M., Rodríguez-González, D., Heras-Recuero, E. et al. The Relationship between the complement system and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 26, 127 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03360-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03360-3

Keywords