Skip to main content

Pain catastrophizing negatively impacts drug retention rate in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and axial Spondyloarthritis: results from a 2-years perspective multicenter GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica) study

Abstract

Background

Chronic pain and inflammation are common features of rheumatic conditions such as Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA), often needing prolonged medication treatment for effective management. Maintaining drug retention is essential for both achieving disease control and improving patients' quality of life. This study investigates the influence of pain catastrophizing, a psychological response to pain, on the drug retention rates of PsA and axSpA patients.

Methods

A two-year prospective multicenter observational study involved 135 PsA and 71 axSpA patients. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was employed to assess pain catastrophizing. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were utilized to identify factors associated with drug retention.

Results

In the PsA group, patients early discontinuing therapy showed higher baseline disease activity as well as higher incidence of comorbid fibromyalgia. Notably, pain catastrophizing, specifically the domains of Helplessness, Magnification, and Rumination, were significantly elevated in PsA patients who interrupted the treatment. Multivariable analysis confirmed pain catastrophizing as an independent predictor of drug suspension within two years.

In axSpA, drug discontinuation was associated with female gender, shorter disease duration, higher baseline disease activity as well as elevated levels of pain catastrophizing. Univariable analysis supported the role of pain catastrophizing, including its domains, as predictors of treatment interruption. However, limited events in axSpA patients precluded a multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

This prospective study emphasizes the impact of pain catastrophizing on drug retention in patients with PsA and axSpA.

Background

Spondyloarthritis (SpA), a group of interconnected chronic rheumatic diseases, displaying various clinical features, shares common clinical signs and distinctive genetic traits [1, 2]. The most prevalent forms of SpA are Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Individuals with SpA often show a higher prevalence of obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, an increased risk of cardiovascular issues, and psychological comorbidities [3,4,5,6,7]. These conditions significantly impact the pain perception and the quality of life in SpA patients. In recent years, several studies were published focusing the extended-term usage of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic and targeted synthetic agents (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs) in spondyloarthritis, especially analasying the real-world data; despite of these works the factors associated to the retention rate of bDMARDs remain a pivotal question to be addressed [8].

Psychosocial factors are acknowledged as crucial elements influencing the pain experienced by patients with inflammatory arthritides, with particular attention given to pain catastrophizing (PC). The concept of catastrophizing was originally introduced by Albert Ellis and subsequently adapted by Aaron Beck to describe a maladaptive cognitive style observed in patients with anxiety and depressive disorders. Catastrophizing refers to the irrational anticipation of negative future events. In the context of pain, catastrophizing is broadly defined as an exaggeration of negative cognitive and emotional responses during actual or anticipated painful situations [9,10,11]. To assess catastrophization, the PC Scale (PCS) is employed, which evaluates three domains encompassing various aspects of pain catastrophizing. The first component, referred to as “rumination,” comprises four items related to ruminative thoughts, worry, and the inability to suppress pain-related thoughts. The second component, termed “magnification,” consists of three items reflecting the exaggeration of pain’s unpleasantness and the anticipation of negative outcomes. The third component, labeled “helplessness,” encompasses five items from the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) and an additional item indicating the inability to cope with painful situations [12].

In a previous study we showed that PC negatively impatcs, the achievement of remission and/or low disease activity in inflammatory arthritis [13]. A largely unexplored topic is the relationship between PC and drug retention rate. Patients with PC may be more likely to struggle with adhering to their prescribed treatment plans; this may include non-compliance with medications, missing appointments, or reluctance in changing their lifestyle and engaging physical therapy. Thus, we planned a multicentric prospective observational study to address the possible impact of PC and its related domains on two years drug retention rate in patients with PsA and axSpA.

Methods

A multicenter, prospective (two years) observational study was conducted on enrolled participants with Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis in 7 Rheumatology Clinics of Italy, widely distributed throughout the Country. Consecutive outpatients were recruited between January 2021 and July 2021. At the initial assessment, PsA participants met the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR), while axSpA participants met the 2009 Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Criteria [14, 15]. The study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome (approval no. 78.20 OSS) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions. Inclusion criteria encompassed individuals of both genders, aged over 18 years, who fulfilled the CASPAR or 2009 ASAS criteria. Exclusion criteria included a history of psychiatric disorders as per DSM-V prior to recruitment, a history of malignancy, pregnancy, age exceeding 75, or an inability to provide informed consent for participation in the study. Upon enrollment, the following PsA disease activity scores were recorded by the examining clinicians: Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Minimal Disease Activity (MDA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). Additionally, the following axSpA disease activity scores were collected: BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) [16]. To assess the drug discontinuation rate (considering csDMARDs and/or bDMARDs), any occurrence of withdrawal therapy and adverse events recognized or suspected as linked to therapies were recorded during the two-years follow-up. PC, including its domains of Helplessness, Rumination, and Magnification (as continuous variables), was assessed using the PCS.

Patients fulfilling the 2016 American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for fibromyalgia were further identified in our cohort [17, 18].

Continuous variables were presented as the median with the interquartile range (25th–75th percentile), while categorical variables were expressed as percentages (%). The normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Contingency tables were analyzed using the Chi-squared test, whereas rank-based comparisons were conducted using the Mann–Whitney test and Kruskal–Wallis test with Holm’s pairwise comparison adjustments. To identify variables associated with drug retention rate, both univariable and multivariable regression analyses were employed. In the multivariable analysis, variables with a p-value of less than 0.1 in the univariate analysis, along with age and sex, were considered. Multivariable analysis of retention predictors was computed using the Cox proportional-hazards model.

All the statistical analyses were carried out by using Stata version 14, and statistical significance was defined as p-values less than 0.05.

Results

The study population included 135 patents affected by Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and 71 by Axial Spondiloarthritis (axSpA). The main demographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the study populations are reported in Table 1 for PsA and in Table 2 for axSpA.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of PsA participants
Table 2 Clinical characteristics of axSpA participants

In PsA patient cohort, the one-year Retention Rate was 79.26%. [Drug suspension related to primary failure in 7.20% of patients, secondary failure in 60.71% of patients, side effects in 14.23% and other reasons in 17.86% of patients]. Moreover, the two-year Retention Rate was 69.63% (n = 94), and most of the patients (73%) discontinued the drug for secondary failure. A large percentage of PsA patients discontinuing therapy were at the same time assuming steroid (drug suspenders 34.15% vs still treated 18.09%, p = 0.041), had higher values of baseline DAPSA (drug suspenders 20.3 still treated 11.06, p = 0.0011), and were more frequently affected by fibromyalgia (drug suspenders 47.37% vs still treated 21.84%, p = 0.004). The PCS showed significantly increased levels of PC (drug suspenders 29 vs still treated 16, p = 0.0002) and all its specific domains: Helplessness (drug suspenders 13 still treated 7, p = 0.0004), magnification (drug suspenders 4 vs still treated 2, p = 0.0127) and rumination (drug suspenders 12.5 vs still treated 6, p = 0.0005) in PsA patients discontinuing therapy.

To further evaluate the relationship between PC and the drug retention rate of these patients, univariable (Table 3) and multivariable linear regression (Table 4) analysis were also performed.

Table 3 Univariable linear regression (PsA participants)
Table 4 Multivariable regression (PsA participants)

The univariable linear regression, as reported in Table 3, confirmed fibromyalgia comorbidity, corticosteroids assumption, higher disease activity at baseline DAPSA and incremented PC levels as best predictors for drug suspension, within two years of follow-up. Of note, the multivariable logistic regression (adjusted for age, sex, DAPSA and CCS use) showed significant relationships between drug discontinuation and: high PCS, helplessness domain, rumination domain, but not for magnification domain.

As far as axSpA patients are concerned, the one-year Retention Rate was 84.51%. [Drug suspension related to primary failure in 9.09% of patients, secondary failure in 54,55% of patients, side effects in 27.27% and other reasons in 9.09% of patients]. Moreover, the two-year Retention Rate was 80.28%, and the most frequent cause of suspension (45%) was secondary failure. In axSpA, the drug discontinuation was significantly more frequent in female patients (69.23%, p = 0.04), in patient with a shorter disease duration (drug suspenders 59 months vs still in treatment 87 months, p = 0.035), with higher baseline BASDAI disease activity (7 vs 3.75, p = 0.0002) and higher level of PC (31 vs 17.5, p = 0.0001). Of note, the univariable logistic regression showed that female gender, increased baseline BASDAI, and higher PCS and all its components: helplessness, magnification, rumination) may be significant predictors of treatment discontinuation in the first two years of follow-up (Table 5).

Table 5 Univariable linear regression (axSpA participants)

Due to the limited number of events (discontinuation of csDMARDs and/or bDMARDs at 2 years of follow up), a multivariate analysis was not performed for axSpA participants.

Discussion

Rheumatic conditions, including PsA and axSpA, are characterized by chronic pain and inflammation, which often require long-term pharmacological treatments. The drug retention, in these conditions, is crucial to achieve optimal disease control and a better quality of life ( 8, 19, 20). However, several factors may influence drug retention, and in this context, the role of PC is still largely unknown [9]. In this study we described, as primary aim, that PC, independent of treatments efficacy, is significantly associated with drug discontinuation both in PsA and axSpA patients. Furthermore, we observed that all the specific PC domains, such as Helplessness, Rumination and Magnification, were significantly associated with therapy discontinuation after 2 years follow-up. We observed that PsA patients suspending therapy, before the end of the second year of follow up, were more frequently affected by fibromyalgia and showing higher baseline disease activity, thus suggesting the correlations between fibromyalgia and higher levels of disease activity with drug discontinuation in PsA patients [21, 22]. Furthermore, in a previous paper, we published that PC specifically correlated with the number of tender joints, patient-reported pain, and patient global assessment, thus, confirming its predominantly impact on the subjective dimension of the disease activity scores, independent of inflammation [13, 23, 24]. In this setting we recently published how various aspects of the PCS may influence the achievement of low disease activity and remission, as measured by DAPSA and BASDAI. Of note, the significant correlation between PCS and the disease activity of other rheumatic diseases was already described in scientific literature [11, 25,26,27]. In detail, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that PC and its components helplessness and rumination were independent predictors of drug suspension within two years. In contrast, a predictive relationship was not observed for magnification. This discrepancy may be due to our decision to deliberately exclude individuals with a documented history of psychiatric disorders, as outlined in DSM-V. In fact, it has been reported that magnification shows a significant association with both physical and mental health-related quality of life (QOL) and depressed mood [28]. These results partially mirror what we already published in which females with longer disease durations significantly correlate with drug discontinuation [8]. Nonetheless, another study, despite demonstrating the mentioned relation between female and low retention rate for anti-TNFi assumption, did not found differences in both genders for methotrexate [29].

For axSpA, drug suspension was significantly associated with higher levels of PC, female gender, shorter disease duration, as well as higher baseline BASDAI. Univariable logistic regression analysis strongly confirmed that female gender, higher baseline BASDAI, and higher PC levels, along with its components, were predictors of treatment suspension within two years. Available literature already reported a higher retention rate in axSpA male patients, as well as the relationship between drug withdrawal and higher BASDAI levels [30,31,32].

Conclusions

Taking together all these data, we may assume that PC is not just a psychological response to pain but may have important consequences on the patient’s ability to adhere to treatments and a better knowledge of this problem may help healthcare providers in managing patients with rheumatic conditions.

We are aware that our study has some limitations including the relatively low number of participants, which does not allow us to derive robust conclusion; on the other hand, despite the limitations, the screening for any previous psychological intervention in our participants allow us to select a well-defined cohort to assess the role of PC. Moreover, our Italian multicenter approach had the advantage to grant a sample representative of the whole national population; these results could therefore be generalized to Caucasian populations.

In conclusion, PC has emerged as a significant factor affecting drug retention in PsA and axSpA patients.

These findings highlight the critical need for clinicians to assess and address PC to improve treatment outcomes. Given the potential impact on patient management and quality of life, further research is essential to explore the mechanisms underlying this relationship and to develop targeted interventions. Future studies should also examine the generalizability of these results to diverse populations.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

SPA:

Spondyloarthritis

PsA:

Psoriatic Arthritis

axSpA:

Axial Spondyloarthritis

csDMARDs:

Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

bDMARDs:

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

PC:

Pain catastrophizing

PCS:

Pain Catastrophizing Scale

CSQ:

Coping Strategies Questionnaire

CASPAR:

Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis

ASAS:

Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society);

DAPSA:

Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis

MDA:

Minimal Disease Activity

BASDAI:

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

PASI:

Psoriasis Area Severity Index

LEI:

Leeds Enthesitis Index

BASFI:

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index

ASDAS-CRP:

Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CCS:

Corticosteroids

NSAIDs:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

SNRI:

Serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor

TJ:

Tender joints

SJ:

Swollen joints

PtGA:

Patient global assessment

PP:

Patient pain

EGA:

Examiner global assessment

CRP:

C-reactive protein

HADS:

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

References

  1. Dougados M, Baeten D. Spondyloarthritis. Lancet Lond Engl. 2011;377(9783):2127–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. FitzGerald O, Ogdie A, Chandran V, Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Tillett W, et al. Psoriatic arthritis Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2021;7(1):59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haque N, Lories RJ, de Vlam K. Comorbidities associated with psoriatic arthritis compared with non-psoriatic spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(2):376–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scriffignano S, Perrotta FM, De Socio A, Lubrano E. Role of comorbidities in spondyloarthritis including psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(1):3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Navarini L, Caso F, Costa L, Currado D, Stola L, Perrotta F, et al. Cardiovascular risk prediction in ankylosing spondylitis: from traditional scores to machine learning assessment. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7(4):867–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Navarini L, Margiotta DPE, Caso F, Currado D, Tasso M, Angeletti S, et al. Performances of five risk algorithms in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: An Italian bicentric study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0205506.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Caso F, Navarini L, Carubbi F, Picchianti-Diamanti A, Chimenti MS, Tasso M, et al. Mediterranean diet and Psoriatic Arthritis activity: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40(6):951–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Navarini L, Costa L, Tasso M, Chimenti MS, Currado D, Fonti GL, et al. Retention rates and identification of factors associated with anti-TNFα, anti-IL17, and anti-IL12/23R agents discontinuation in psoriatic arthritis patients: results from a real-world clinical setting. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(9):2663–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Linton SJ, Nicholas MK, MacDonald S, Boersma K, Bergbom S, Maher C, et al. The role of depression and catastrophizing in musculoskeletal pain. Eur J Pain Lond Engl. 2011;15(4):416–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quartana PJ, Campbell CM, Edwards RR. Pain catastrophizing: a critical review. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9(5):745–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilk M, Łosińska K, Pripp AH, Korkosz M, Haugeberg G. Pain catastrophizing in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: biopsychosocial perspective and impact on health-related quality of life. Rheumatol Int. 2022;42(4):669–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA, Hauptmann W, Jones J, O’Neill E. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Behav Med. 1997;20(6):589–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Currado D, Biaggi A, Pilato A, Marino A, Ruscitti P, Pantano I, et al. The negative impact of pain catastrophising on disease activity: analyses of data derived from patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023;41(9):1856–61.

  14. Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2665–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68 Suppl 2:ii1–44.

  16. Mease PJ. Measures of psoriatic arthritis: Tender and Swollen Joint Assessment, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI), Mander/Newcastle Enthesitis Index (MEI), Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC), Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesis Score (MASES), Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI), Patient Global for Psoriatic Arthritis, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life (PsAQOL), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC), Psoriatic Arthritis Joint Activity Index (PsAJAI), Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S64-85.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bazzichi L, Giacomelli C, Consensi A, Giorgi V, Batticciotto A, Di Franco M, et al. One year in review 2020: fibromyalgia. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38 Suppl 123(1):3–8.

  18. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RL, et al. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46(3):319–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Armağan B, Kılıç L, Farisoğulları B, Yardımcı GK, Bilgin E, Bölek EÇ, et al. Drug retention rate and predictive factors of drug survival for secukinumab in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2023;43(1):147–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Athanassiou P, Kotrotsios A, Kallitsakis I, Bounas A, Dimitroulas T, Garyfallos A, et al. The effects of golimumab on work productivity and quality of life among work-active axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients treated in the routine care in Greece: the ‘GO-UP’ study. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2022;31(5):1385–99.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrito M, Cincinelli G, Manara M, Di Taranto R, Favalli EG, Caporali R. Retention rate of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, anti-interleukin 17, and anti-interleukin 12/23 drugs in a single-center cohort of psoriatic arthritis patients. Reumatismo. 2023;75(2).

  22. Mease PJ, Collier DH, Saunders KC, Li G, Kremer JM, Greenberg JD. Comparative effectiveness of biologic monotherapy versus combination therapy for patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from the Corrona registry. RMD Open. 2015;1(1):e000181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Navarini L, Currado D, Pilato A, Marino A, Biaggi A, Di Donato S, et al. Association between Patient Acceptable Symptom State and disease activity in psoriatic arthritis is disrupted by confounders, including comorbid fibromyalgia. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2024;42(6):1150–5.

  24. Navarini L, Currado D, Caso F, Costa L, Chimenti MS, D’Antonio A, et al. Duration of clinical remission and low disease activity impacts on quality of life and its domains in psoriatic arthritis patients: results from an Italian multicentre study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2022;40(7):1285–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Penhoat M, Saraux A, Le Goff B, Augereau P, Maugars Y, Berthelot JM. High pain catastrophizing scores in one-fourth of patients on biotherapy for spondylarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81(3):235–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayashi K, Morishima T, Ikemoto T, Miyagawa H, Okamoto T, Ushida T, et al. Pain Catastrophizing is independently associated with quality of life in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis. Pain Med Malden Mass. 2019;20(11):2220–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kieskamp SC, Paap D, Carbo MJG, Wink F, Bos R, Bootsma H, et al. Central sensitization, illness perception and obesity should be considered when interpreting disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2021;60(10):4476–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Craner JR, Gilliam WP, Sperry JA. Rumination, magnification, and helplessness: How do Different aspects of pain catastrophizing relate to pain severity and functioning? Clin J Pain. 2016;32(12):1028–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Generali E, Sciré CA, Cantarini L, Selmi C. Sex differences in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review. Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ. 2016;18(3–4):203–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chimenti MS, Fonti GL, Conigliaro P, Sunzini F, Scrivo R, Navarini L, et al. One-year effectiveness, retention rate, and safety of secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: a real-life multicenter study. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020;20(7):813–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fabbroni M, Cantarini L, Caso F, Costa L, Pagano VA, Frediani B, et al. Drug retention rates and treatment discontinuation among anti-TNF-α agents in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis in clinical practice. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:862969.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Favalli EG, Selmi C, Becciolini A, Biggioggero M, Ariani A, Santilli D, et al. Eight-year retention rate of first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in spondyloarthritis: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(6):867–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, the acquisition, and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to the critical review and revision of the manuscript and approved the final version. All the authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. DC study design, data acquisition, statistical analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the first draft of the paper; FS study design, data acquisition, statistical analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the first draft of the paper; PR study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; AM study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; IP study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; MV study design, interpretation of data; OB study design, interpretation of data, statistical analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the first draft of the paper; VP study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; CDV study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; FC study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; LC study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; MT study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; FC study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; FM study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; FDV study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; AC study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; LS study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; AR study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; MV study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; EC study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; LK study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; FT study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; AP study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; LL study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; FPC study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; FP study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; GG study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; RS study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; PC study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; FC study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data; RG study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data, interpretation of data, writing of the first draft of the paper; LN study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data, interpretation of data, writing of the first draft of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onorina Berardicurti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome (approval no. 78.20 OSS) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Currado, D., Saracino, F., Ruscitti, P. et al. Pain catastrophizing negatively impacts drug retention rate in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and axial Spondyloarthritis: results from a 2-years perspective multicenter GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica) study. Arthritis Res Ther 26, 162 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03396-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03396-5

Keywords