Volume 9 Supplement 2
How does endothelial cell injury start? The role of endothelin in systemic sclerosis
© BioMed Central Ltd 2007
Published: 15 August 2007
A considerable amount of research time has been invested in studies aimed at elucidating pathogenic processes in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Despite this, major challenges for biomedical science remain, such as identification of the key factors that determine susceptibility to SSc, and elucidation of the precise nature of the initiating event that causes endothelial cell injury and ultimately brings about the biological cascade(s) that lead to the pathologic vascular changes. Involved factors are likely to include genetic perturbations, environmental cues, tissue injury, infection and hypoxia/oxidative stress. As important as determining the initiating events are the identification and characterization of key factors that are functionally important in driving vascular disease progression, because these factors are potential targets for therapeutic intervention. This article reviews the role of endothelin as an example of a pleiotropic mediator with effects on various aspects of SSc pathogenesis, such as inflammation, vasculopathy and tissue remodelling.
In order to understand the initiators of endothelial injury and how the ensuing vascular dysfunction contributes to the development of systemic sclerosis (SSc), it is necessary to consider the normal biology of the endothelium and of the myriad of biological molecules and biological functions under its control, and to assess which specific processes are dysregulated in disease. In SSc, the vasculopathy is one of the earliest pathological events, characterized by endothelial cell activation and altered vascular tone. These pathological changes are accompanied by the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines and angiogenic regulatory factors, and the loss of redox control, leading to oxidative stress and hypoxia. This complex array of molecular interactions involves a number of cell types including the endothelial cells and their attendant perivascular supporting cells (pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells [vSMCs]), and inflammatory cells, and they are profoundly influenced by the presence of growth factors, cytokines, chemokines and potent vasoactive factors. Together, this diverse range of factors is believed to initiate and drive the vascular pathogenesis that leads to severe vessel disease and occlusion. Here we focus on one particularly attractive candidate, endothelin, and critically examine the cellular and molecular activities mediated by endothelin and its receptors that are intimately associated with endothelial cell injury and vascular dysfunction in SSc.
The vascular endothelium is a complex, highly specialized and metabolically active organ, which performs a number of essential biological functions. The endothelium provides a compatible interface to facilitate blood circulation, it inherently inhibits excessive platelet aggregation and leucocyte adhesion, and it produces a balance of vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory molecules that coordinate vascular tone and serve to inhibit extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and prevent smooth muscle cell proliferation. The endothelium also serves as a multifunctional interface between blood and all internal organs, selectively determining the movement of macromolecules and governing the recruitment of circulating cells from the blood into the extravascular tissues. The prominent endocrine functions of the endothelium work to regulate vascular tone, through the production of vasoconstrictive (for instance, endothelin [ET]-1) and vasodilatory (for example, nitric oxide and prostaglandins) molecules; to maintain blood fluidity; to regulate platelet function; and to control inflammation. Healthy functioning of the endothelium is critical for remodelling of blood vessels, through angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, during times of tissue growth and repair. Thus, the endothelial cell phenotype must be regulated, and this is achieved by environmental cues and mechanical forces such as shear stress, as well as inflammatory and angiogenic stimuli .
Triggers of endothelial cell injury and dysfunction
The endothelial response to injury can be divided into two 'levels' of response: an initial rapid response and a slower, phenotypic response. The initial rapid response involves (among other factors) changes in levels of nitric oxide, prostaglandins, ET-1, von Willebrand factor and tissue plasminogen activator. The slower response depends on fundamental changes in cell surface characteristics, and alterations in the underlying basement membrane and the smooth muscle cells that surround the endothelium. These changes are brought about by molecules that are particularly potent growth factors involved in the deposition of ECM, and activation and proliferation of the vSMCs, pericytes and other mesenchymal cell types associated with the blood vessel wall. This ultimately results in vessel remodelling, with profound changes in cellular architecture .
Pericytes are associated with microvessels and capillaries (about 30 μm diameter) and smooth muscle cells are associated with intermediate (> 50 μm) and large (1 to 5 mm) vessels and muscular arteries . In terms of endothelial cells and blood vessels, one must consider these as functional units, which also involve both pericytes and vSMCs. In SSc there are a number of important endothelium-derived mediators that have been shown to be important in the early disease process. It is important to determine which of these link vascular damage to the ensuing fibrogenic or pathogenic tissue remodelling process and the characteristic signs and symptoms of SSc.
Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis
Patients with SSc often exhibit early signs of vasculopathy, with many experiencing Raynaud's phenomenon, often for many years before developing overt signs of skin fibrosis. Consistent with this, morphological changes in capillaries are detectable before or at disease onset, which can be used for early diagnosis using nail-fold capillaroscopy. Changes in the blood vessels of the SSc patient are frequently associated with stimulation of both the innate and adaptive immune responses, resulting in B-cell and T-cell activation and, in many cases, autoantibody production. Inflammation is believed to be a primary driver that leads to tissue remodelling and gives rise to the characteristic features of excess matrix production, caused by an imbalance in turnover and increased deposition of various extracellular proteins . The impact of this inflammation probably depends on the organs involved, with evidence for a stronger association of inflammation and fibrosis, for example, in the lungs, whereas significant inflammatory infiltrates in the skin are limited to perivascular areas in early-stage disease . However, the expression of profibrotic mediators is not limited to inflammatory cells in the skin, and resident cells, such as dermal fibroblasts, express increased levels of these mediators in later stage disease .
These changes result in a sequence of pathological events that includes impaired cell-cell communication between epithelial cells and fibroblasts, and development of fibrotic lesions that disrupt the normal tissue architecture and lead to impaired expression of the correct molecular cues and cellular mediators that maintain normal tissue structure and function. Ultimately, these abnormalities lead to vascular and interstitial fibrogenic processes. This so-called 'replacement fibrosis' replaces normal tissue architecture and often leads to organ compromise and failure .
Because early disease is initiated in the vasculature, and many of the manifestations of SSc are vascular in nature (capillary abnormalities, vessel occlusion and fibrosis, and digital ulceration), identification of the components of the pathway from the initial vascular insult to the downstream fibrotic phenotype is critical. However, characterization of the early vascular events is challenging in SSc, because patients are usually available only in later stages of disease when the disease is already established and because animal models only incompletely reflect the human condition [10, 11]. Regardless of the precise mechanisms that underlie the initial vascular injury, it might be even more important to identify and characterize the array of mediators driving the vascular remodelling that leads to the vascular features typical of SSc. Those mediators that are over-produced (beyond normal levels of production) by endothelial cells of SSc patients include growth factors, cytokines, and other mediators of hyperplasia and hypertrophy. These include ET-1, connective tissue growth factor and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, and matrix-modulating proteins such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and natural tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) [3, 12]. They are also important regulators of the activation and function of inflammatory mediators, including tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukins and some chemokines. These mediators in turn have a significant impact on the progression of connective tissue diseases.
Anti-endothelial cell antibodies and oxidative stress
Another important pathological feature of SSc, and one which is probably highly relevant to the vasculopathy, is the presence of specific anti-endothelial cell autoantibodies (AECAs) [13, 14]. These antibodies are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that specifically recognize endothelial cell proteins and molecules present on the endothelial cell surface. Studies of AECAs have shown that these antibodies can also activate endothelial cells to express cell adhesion molecules, thereby altering leucocyte attachment, and can also lead to endothelial cell damage and apoptosis. Several studies have also suggested that AECAs may play a prominent role in disease progression. A recent study  yielded the exciting finding that all SSc sera examined expressed autoantibodies directed against platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors. These autoantibodies were found to stimulate PDGF receptor signalling, which led to the generation of reactive oxygen species. This increase in oxidative stress (a hallmark feature of SSc) strongly suggests a pathogenic role for these autoantibodies in disease, and that they are involved in autocrine and paracrine activities, and the cascade of events that leads to enhanced ECM synthesis.
Thus, the identification of functional key players in the processes that link vascular dysfunction to fibrogenesis will assist in defining potential molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Along this line, processes that impact on both the vascular and fibrotic pathogenic processes are of particular interest. Although several molecular mediators are involved in these processes, one of the key contributors is ET-1. This article focuses on the biological function(s) of this molecule, and the pivotal cell and molecular mechanism(s) regulated by ET-1 in health and pathological activities in connective tissue diseases.
The endothelin axis: role in the control of vascular tone
The endothelins are a family of three vasoactive peptides (ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3). The three 21-amino-acid endothelin isoforms bind to two endothelin receptors (endothelin receptor subtype A [ETA] and ETB), with equal affinities for ETB but with a hierarchy of affinities for the ETA receptor. ET-1 has the highest affinity for ETA, followed by ET-2 and ET-3 . The roles of the ETA and ETB receptors are becoming less clearly distinguished as the literature expands. Indeed, both have been implicated as mediators of the deleterious effects of ET-1. The receptors exhibit a wide tissue distribution and are expressed in kidney, liver, lung and skin; they are known to be abnormally expressed in various diseases characterized by defective vascular control. Abnormalities observed in the endothelin system have been associated with vasoconstriction, vasospasm and vascular hypertrophy.
Endothelin-1 and receptor interaction
ET-1 is the major and most studied endothelin isoform. ET-1 is produced by endothelial and mesenchymal cell types, such as fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, and acts in a paracrine and autocrine manner. ET-1 production is controlled by a number of soluble factors, including TGF-β, which is a well recognized major profibrotic factor, and it plays a major role in constriction and proliferation.
The widespread distribution of endothelin receptors on many cell types suggests that they have important and wideranging biological activities in vivo. In the context of our understanding of the processes involved in SSc and other connective tissue diseases, the primary 'target' cells for the activity of ET-1 include smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts (and their differentiation to myofibroblasts, which is the characteristic cell type of SSc and other connective tissue diseases) and macrophages, in which activation by ET-1 elicits a number of cell-type specific responses. In smooth muscle cells ET-1 promotes vasoconstriction and results in proliferation and elevated production of the key profibrotic factors TGF-β and PDGF. In fibroblasts ET-1 increases ECM production and increases adhesion molecule expression, thereby facilitating leucocyte-fibroblast interactions. This is also observed in endothelial cells . ETB receptors are expressed by macrophages, and in these cells ET-1 modulates inflammatory responses such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation, release of free radicals, and increased levels of interleukin-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1  and TGF-β.
Multiple actions of endothelin
The important actions of ET-1 from the perspective of connective tissue remodelling include induction of proliferation, chemotaxis of macrophages and smooth muscle cells, activation of smooth muscle cells, and differentiation of fibroblasts to myofibroblast phenotypes.
Endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis
Elevated levels of endothelin-1 are present in patients with systemic sclerosis
There is now a wealth of evidence that ET-1 is expressed in both early-stage and late-stage SSc. The protein has been shown to be over-expressed in biological fluids and tissue sections in patients with SSc, and increased expression of ET-1 and increased receptor binding sites are found in presclerotic and early diffuse skin lesions . Elevated levels of ET-1 have been observed in multiple organs that are affected by SSc, notably blood vessels, lung, kidney and skin .
Endothelin-1 is implicated in the pathological sequence of events that is characteristic of systemic sclerosis
Within the context of tissue remodelling and fibrosis in SSc, it is the vSMCs, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts that are the cells of particular interest. Laboratory experiments have focused on evaluating the characteristics of these cell types and extrapolating the findings to what may occur in vivo, and on determining how this information can be used effectively in the clinical setting. Thus, we are interested in examining cell contractility and migration, cell migration, inflammation, and matrix deposition and remodelling.
ET-1 activates the surface expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 on fibroblasts, and collagen production by both dermal and pulmonary fibroblasts. It can also stimulate fibroblasts to exhibit potent procontractile properties and promote the formation of highly contractive myofibroblasts [25, 26]. In SSc it is important to note that the MMP/TIMP cascade is dysregulated, with an increase in many MMPs. Particularly intriguing is the elevation in MMP-2 (gelatinase A), which is capable of processing endothelin precursors to active endothelin, thereby potentially exacerbating the disease process. Classical and MMP-activated endothelin can induce gene transcription and result in the familiar cellular changes of fibrosis, matrix deposition and tissue remodelling that are observed in SSc.
As well as matrix production and remodelling, SSc is characterized by an early inflammatory response that involves increased leucocyte infiltration to affected tissues and elevated leucocyte-fibroblast interactions. Examining biopsies from patients with early disease, Koch and coworkers  found a number of cell adhesion molecules known to mediate leucocyte interactions to be over-expressed. The nature of these interactions has been addressed in a number of studies, and the importance of the leucocyte function-associated antigen-1/ICAM-1 pathway in T-cell/fibroblast interaction has been noted . In the laboratory, T cells attach and bind more readily to SSc fibroblasts than to control fibroblasts , and by using antibody blockade it is possible to inhibit specifically the binding of these T cells to SSc fibroblasts in vitro. Interestingly, ICAM-1 expression on both normal and SSc fibroblasts is activated by ET-1. By adding ET-1 and an antagonist, this increased attachment could be inhibited. ET-1 therefore appears to increase ICAM-1, which increases T-cell interaction with fibroblasts. It might thus be an important factor in leucocyte recruitment into extravascular tissues in the early inflammatory stages of SSc.
Further evidence for the role of ICAM-1 was recently reported . This study detailed the intracellular signalling pathways that lead to the increased expression of ICAM-1 elicited by ET-1 by using inhibitors of signalling pathways, transfections with ICAM-1 promoter-reporter constructs, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The authors demonstrated that the regulation of fibroblast ICAM-1 expression by ET-1 was mediated by NF-κB. It was apparent that NF-κB is activated by ET-1, which activates the ICAM-1 gene in a manner similar to that with interleukin-1. ET-1 therefore can also play a proinflammatory role, and is able to turn on ICAM-1 gene expression and cause an increase in leucocyte-fibroblast interaction. This upregulation of fibroblast ICAM-1 was found to be potently inhibited by the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan and specific inhibitors of ET-1-dependent signalling pathways .
Impact of endothelin receptor antagonists on the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis
Evidence for the involvement of ET-1 in the pathophysiology of SSc also comes from receptor blockade studies. For example, ET-1 has been shown to induce an expression pattern in cultured lung fibroblasts similar to that in SSc fibroblasts, and bosentan was shown to attenuate this response and partially 'normalize' the scleroderma phenotype . These studies have been extended using Affymetrix gene expression profiling of control fibroblasts and those from SSc patients. These studies have shown that bosentan reduces the differences observed between the gene expression patterns in SSc and control lung fibroblasts. The findings of experiments like these demonstrate that approximately one-third of genes that define the SSc signature are modulated toward a more normal profile in the presence of bosentan. However, it must be emphasized that the clinical setting is extremely complex, and it is therefore difficult to unravel fully the pathophysiological scenarios in the laboratory using cell culture studies and animal models. There is clearly significant crosstalk between different cell types in the disease process as well as between different factors. The temporal interaction(s) and links between these biological processes are also important, as are the levels and expression patterns of the critical mediators and responding cell types. Data obtained thus far in the context of SSc support the notion that ET-1 can play an important role in a number of relevant pathological processes, including inflammation, vasculopathy, tissue remodelling and fibrosis. This places ET-1 as a key mediator in this disease.
Returning to the initial question of how endothelial cell injury starts, the answer is that this remains elusive. There are some excellent data from the UCD200 chicken scleroderma model that suggest that endothelial cell apoptosis, promoted by AECAs, is a key early event in endothelial injury , but the human correlates have not been as convincing. However, is it absolutely necessary to know the exact nature of the initiating event(s), or is it equally important to understand the factors that subsequently drive the disease process? One example that supports the latter is the role played by TNF-α in rheumatoid arthritis. Although the role, if any, that TNF-α plays in the initiating events of rheumatoid arthritis is unclear, it is very important in driving inflammation and subsequent disease progression. This in turn defines TNF-α as an optimal target for therapeutic intervention in rheumatoid arthritis.
Indeed, TNF-α inhibitors are now successfully used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Likewise, blocking critical mediators such as ET-1, TGF-β and certain chemokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 may likewise be effective in preventing the progression of fibrotic diseases such as SSc.
Significant evidence suggests that ET-1 is important in a number of aspects of fibrotic diseases such as SSc. In inflammation, through induction of ICAM-1, ET-1 activates adhesion molecule expression, which may be important in regulating the inflammatory response that occurs in the early stages of SSc. It is well accepted that endothelin plays a major role in vasoconstriction, and it is an important mediator in ECM remodelling and deposition. ET-1 can activate fibroblasts and other mesenchymal cells along the differentiation pathway toward the myofibroblast, which is the principal culprit in tissue remodelling, repair and ultimately fibrosis. ET-1 activates adhesion molecule expression, which may be important in regulating the inflammatory response. ET-1 receptor antagonists, such as bosentan, have been shown to block early and late-stage manifestations of disease and may thus help to prevent the progression of fibrotic diseases such as SSc.
anti-endothelial cell autoantibody
endothelin receptor subtype A/B
intercellular adhesion molecule
platelet-derived growth factor
transforming growth factor
tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase
tumour necrosis factor
vascular smooth muscle cell.
The authors would like to acknowledge medical writing support funded by an educational grant from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
This article is part of Arthritis Research & Therapy Volume 9 Supplement 2: Advances in systemic sclerosis and related fibrotic and vascular conditions, and is based on presentations made at a symposium entitled Advances in systemic sclerosis and connective tissue disease, sponsored by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, held in Athens, Greece in April 2006. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://arthritis-research.com/supplements/9/S2. This supplement has been supported by an educational grant from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
- Koch AE, Distler O: Vasculopathy and disordered angiogenesis in selected rheumatic diseases: rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007, 9 (Suppl 2): S3-10.1186/ar2187.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ross R: Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 115-126. 10.1056/NEJM199901143400207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newby AC: Matrix metalloproteinases regulate migration, proliferation, and death of vascular smooth muscle cells by degrading matrix and non-matrix substrates. Cardiovasc Res. 2006, 69: 614-624. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bou-Gharios G, Ponticos M, Rajkumar V, Abraham D: Extra-cellular matrix in vascular networks. Cell Prolif. 2004, 37: 207-220. 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2004.00306.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Denton CP, Black CM, Abraham DJ: Mechanisms and consequences of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006, 2: 134-144. 10.1038/ncprheum0115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abraham DJ, Varga J: Scleroderma: from cell and molecular mechanisms to disease models. Trends Immunol. 2005, 26: 587-595. 10.1016/j.it.2005.09.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jimenez SA, Derk CT: Following the molecular pathways toward an understanding of the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Ann Intern Med. 2004, 140: 37-50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chizzolini C, Parel Y, Scheja A, Dayer JM: Polarized subsets of human T-helper cells induce distinct patterns of chemokine production by normal and systemic sclerosis dermal fibroblasts. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005, 8: R10-10.1186/ar1860.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ihn H: Scleroderma, fibroblasts, signaling, and excessive extracellular matrix. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005, 7: 156-162. 10.1007/s11926-005-0069-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen VA, Sgonc R, Dietrich H, Wick G: Endothelial injury in internal organs of University of California at Davis line 200 (UCD 200) chickens, an animal model for systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). J Autoimmun. 2000, 14: 143-149. 10.1006/jaut.1999.0355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto T: The bleomycin-induced scleroderma model: what have we learned for scleroderma pathogenesis?. Arch Dermatol Res. 2006, 297: 333-344. 10.1007/s00403-005-0635-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G: Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res. 2006, 69: 562-573. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carvalho D, Savage CO, Black CM, Pearson JD: IgG antiendothelial cell autoantibodies from scleroderma patients induce leukocyte adhesion to human vascular endothelial cells in vitro. Induction of adhesion molecule expression and involvement of endothelium-derived cytokines. J Clin Invest. 1996, 97: 111-119. 10.1172/JCI118377.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmed SS, Tan FK, Arnett FC, Jin L, Geng YJ: Induction of apoptosis and fibrillin 1 expression in human dermal endothelial cells by scleroderma sera containing anti-endothelial cell antibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54: 2250-2262. 10.1002/art.21952.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baroni SS, Santillo M, Bevilacqua F, Luchetti M, Spadoni T, Mancini M, Fraticelli P, Sambo P, Funaro A, Kazlauskas A, et al: Stimulatory autoantibodies to the PDGF receptor in systemic sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 2667-2676. 10.1056/NEJMoa052955.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rubanyi GM, Polokoff MA: Endothelins: molecular biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Pharmacol Rev. 1994, 46: 325-415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galiè N, Manes A, Branzi A: The endothelin system in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 2004, 61: 227-237. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- La M, Reid JJ: Endothelin-1 and the regulation of vascular tone. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1995, 22: 315-323. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1995.tb02008.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fagan KA, McMurtry IF, Rodman DM: Role of endothelin-1 in lung disease. Respir Res. 2001, 2: 90-101. 10.1186/rr44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimada K, Matsushita Y, Wakabayashi K, Takahashi M, Matsubara A, Iijima Y, Tanzawa K: Cloning and functional expression of human endothelin-converting enzyme cDNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995, 207: 807-812. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez-Patron C, Zouki C, Whittal R, Chan JS, Davidge ST, Filep JG: Matrix metalloproteinases regulate neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion through generation of endothelin-1[1–32]. FASEB J. 2001, 15: 2230-2240. 10.1096/fj.01-0178com.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson SH, Simari RD, Lerman A: The effect of endothelin-1 on nuclear factor kappa B in macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 286: 968-972. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5485.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vancheeswaran R, Magoulas T, Efrat G, Wheeler-Jones C, Olsen I, Penny R, Black CM: Circulating endothelin-1 levels in systemic sclerosis subsets: a marker of fibrosis or vascular dysfunction?. J Rheumatol. 1994, 21: 1838-1844.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abraham DJ, Vancheeswaran R, Dashwood MR, Rajkumar VS, Pantelides P, Xu SW, du Bois RM, Black CM: Increased levels of endothelin-1 and differential endothelin type A and B receptor expression in scleroderma-associated fibrotic lung disease. Am J Pathol. 1997, 151: 831-841.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi-Wen X, Denton CP, Dashwood MR, Holmes AM, Bou-Gharios G, Pearson JD, Black CM, Abraham DJ: Fibroblast matrix gene expression and connective tissue remodeling: role of endothelin-1. J Invest Dermatol. 2001, 116: 417-425. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01256.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi-Wen X, Chen Y, Denton CP, Eastwood M, Renzoni EA, Bou-Gharios G, Pearson JD, Dashwood M, du Bois RM, Black CM, et al: Endothelin-1 promotes myofibroblast induction through the ETA receptor via a rac/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway and is essential for the enhanced contractile phenotype of fibrotic fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell. 2004, 15: 2707-2719. 10.1091/mbc.E03-12-0902.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koch AE, Kronfeld-Harrington LB, Szekanecz Z, Cho MM, Haines GK, Harlow LA, Strieter RM, Kunkel SL, Massa MC, Barr WG, et al: In situ expression of cytokines and cellular adhesion molecules in the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis. Their role in early and late disease. Pathobiology. 1993, 61: 239-246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakkas LI, Chikanza IC, Platsoucas CD: Mechanisms of disease: the role of immune cells in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006, 2: 679-685. 10.1038/ncprheum0346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abraham C, Griffith J, Miller J: The dependence for leukocyte function-associated antigen-1/ICAM-1 interactions in T cell activation cannot be overcome by expression of high density TCR ligand. J Immunol. 1999, 162: 4399-4405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waters CE, Shi-Wen X, Denton CP, Abraham DJ, Pearson JD: Signaling pathways regulating intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression by endothelin 1: comparison with interleukin-1beta in normal and scleroderma dermal fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54: 649-660. 10.1002/art.21572.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu SW, Denton CP, Dashwood MR, Abraham DJ, Black CM: Endothelin-1 regulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in normal and sclerodermal fibroblasts. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998, S545-S547. 10.1097/00005344-199800001-00157. Suppl 1
- Sgonc R, Gruschwitz MS, Dietrich H, Recheis H, Gershwin ME, Wick G: Endothelial cell apoptosis is a primary pathogenetic event underlying skin lesions in avian and human scleroderma. J Clin Invest. 1996, 98: 785-792. 10.1172/JCI118851.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar