Skip to content

Advertisement

Arthritis Research & Therapy

Research article
Open Access

Characterisation of the cannabinoid receptor system in synovial tissue and fluid in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

  • Denise Richardson†1,
  • Richard G Pearson†2,
  • Nisha Kurian3,
  • M Liaque Latif3,
  • Michael J Garle3,
  • David A Barrett1,
  • David A Kendall3,
  • Brigitte E Scammell2,
  • Alison J Reeve4 and
  • Victoria Chapman3Email author
†Contributed equally
Arthritis Research & Therapy200810:R43

https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2401

©  Richardson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

Received: 18 September 2007

Accepted: 16 April 2008

Published: 16 April 2008

Abstract

Introduction

Cannabis-based medicines have a number of therapeutic indications, including anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. The endocannabinoid receptor system, including the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) and receptor 2 (CB2) and the endocannabinoids, are implicated in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that cannabis-based drugs have therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and multiple sclerosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the key elements of the endocannabinoid signalling system, which produces immunosuppression and analgesia, are expressed in the synovia of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or RA.

Methods

Thirty-two OA and 13 RA patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were included in this study. Clinical staging was conducted from x-rays scored according to Kellgren-Lawrence and Larsen scales, and synovitis of synovial biopsies was graded. Endocannabinoid levels were quantified in synovial fluid by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The expression of CB1 and CB2 protein and RNA in synovial biopsies was investigated. Functional activity of these receptors was determined with mitogen-activated protein kinase assays. To assess the impact of OA and RA on this receptor system, levels of endocannabinoids in the synovial fluid of patients and non-inflamed healthy volunteers were compared. The activity of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the predominant catabolic endocannabinoid enzyme, was measured in synovium.

Results

CB1 and CB2 protein and RNA were present in the synovia of OA and RA patients. Cannabinoid receptor stimulation of fibroblast-like cells from OA and RA patients produced a time-dependent phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1 and ERK-2 which was significantly blocked by the CB1 antagonist SR141716A. The endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) were identified in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients. However, neither AEA nor 2-AG was detected in synovial fluid from normal volunteers. FAAH was active in the synovia of OA and RA patients and was sensitive to inhibition by URB597 (3'-(aminocarbonyl) [1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-cyclohexylcarbamate).

Conclusion

Our data predict that the cannabinoid receptor system present in the synovium may be an important therapeutic target for the treatment of pain and inflammation associated with OA and RA.

Keywords

Rheumatoid ArthritisRheumatoid Arthritis PatientTotal Knee ArthroplastySynovial FluidSynovial Tissue

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis affecting synovial joints [1]. The aetiology of OA is poorly understood, with mechanical, metabolic, and inflammatory causes. Inflammation and angiogenesis and their possible role in disease progression and pain are increasingly being recognised as important aetiological factors [2–5]. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic, autoimmune-mediated, inflammatory arthritis [6]. Although the pathogenesis remains incompletely understood, it is characterised by severe, progressive synovitis with rapid destruction of the joint. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and chemokines such as IL-8 are abundant in RA tissue, which is compensated to some degree by the increased production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β [7]. The accepted therapeutic approach to RA is to use disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs at an early stage, and the recent introduction of cytokine inhibitor drugs has increased the effectiveness of treatment considerably. However, an effective remission-inducing drug has yet to be discovered, and the vast majority of RA patients are dependent on lifelong treatment in order to suppress joint damage and functional impairment [6]. There are no proven disease-modifying OA drugs, and current non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatments do not always provide adequate pain relief and have detrimental side effects. Thus, there is a strong rationale for the development of novel drug treatments for arthritis. This can be achieved only by an improved mechanistic understanding of the functional cellular changes associated with this disease.

The cannabinoid receptor system has been implicated in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological processes [8]. Recent pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that cannabis-based drugs have therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases, including RA and multiple sclerosis [9]. Animal studies have demonstrated that activation of cannabinoid receptors attenuates inflammation and nociceptive processing in models of cutaneous and joint inflammation [10–14]. The cannabis-based medicine Sativex (GW Pharmaceuticals plc, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK) has been reported to produce a significant analgesic effect and to suppress disease activity in patients with RA [15].

Two cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), both of which are inhibitory G protein-coupled receptors, have been cloned [8]. CB1 receptors are expressed predominantly by peripheral nerves, spinal cord, and the nervous system as well as peripheral immune cells [16]. CB2 receptors are expressed mainly in peripheral tissue, in particular by immune cells [17]. Activation of CB1 receptors is associated predominantly with a dampening down of neuronal excitability, whereas activation of CB2 receptors is associated with decreases in immune cell function, including attenuated cytokine release [9, 17]. A number of endocannabinoids with activity at the CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors, including N-arachidonyl ethanolamide (anandamide, AEA) and 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG), have been identified [18, 19]. Other structurally related endogenous fatty acid compounds such as oleoyl ethanolamide (OEA) and palmitoyl ethanolamide (PEA) have been identified in biological tissues. These compounds do not bind to cannabinoid receptors but might be involved in facilitating the actions of directly acting endocannabinoids and thus are commonly termed 'entourage' compounds due to their ability to modulate the endocannabinoid system [20, 21]. The endocannabinoids and PEA are synthesised on demand, and AEA, PEA, and OEA are metabolised predominantly by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) [22, 23].

Although the therapeutic benefits of Sativex in RA patients are significant, the mechanisms mediating these effects are unclear. Indeed, the impact of arthritis on the endocannabinoid receptor system, both in terms of receptor expression and levels of endocannabinoids and entourage compounds, is unknown. The endocannabinoid system appears to regulate bone mass by signalling via peripheral CB2 receptors in both osteoblasts and osteoclasts [24]. In a separate study, CB1 knockout mice had significantly increased bone mineral density compared with wild-type mice and were protected from ovariectomy-induced bone loss and CB1- and CB2-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists inhibited osteoclastogenesis in vivo [25]. Thus, the role of the cannabinoid receptor system in bone remodelling and aspects of pathological conditions such as periarticular bony erosions in RA and subchondral bony sclerosis in OA remains unclear.

Several NSAIDs, including ibuprofen, ketorolac, indometacin, and niflumic acid, which act via the inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX), have been shown to inhibit FAAH [26, 27]. This suggests that current treatment of inflammatory pain in OA and RA patients using NSAIDs may be targeting endocannabinoid metabolism in addition to arachidonic acid metabolism. These interactions may be of great clinical importance in terms of multiple-target drug development as synergistic actions of the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib and the endocannabinoid AEA have been observed in an animal model of pain [28].

The aim of the present study was to provide evidence of a role for the cannabinoid receptor system in OA and RA. Here, we report the presence of an active endocannabinoid system, including endocannabinoids, entourage compounds, CB1 and CB2 receptors, and FAAH, in the knee synovia of patients with end-stage OA and RA.

Materials and methods

Patient information and tissue collection

The Nottingham Regional Ethical Committee approved the study, and after informed consent synovial biopsies and fluid were sampled from patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). All x-rays were scored according to Kellgren and Lawrence [29] (OA) and Larsen [30] (RA) scales.

The synovial fluid and biopsies were collected under tourniquet control at the onset of the TKA from 32 OA and 13 RA patients. The synovial fluid samples were centrifuged at 1,000 g for 40 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatants were retained for analysis. Samples of synovial fluid from non-inflamed normal volunteers (n = 6) were kindly provided by Michael Doherty, Academic Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals.

Synovium histology and analysis

Synovial biopsies designated for histological analysis were fixed in 10% formal saline (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), processed into paraffin wax, and stained with Weigert's haematoxylin and eosin. Each biopsy was assigned to one of four categories: 0 = normal: synovial intima less than four cells thick with sparse cellular distribution and few or no inflammatory cells; 1 = mild inflammation: synovial intima three to five cells thick with slight increase in cellularity and with few inflammatory cells; 2 = moderate inflammation: synovial intima four to six cells thick, with dense cellularity and inflammatory cells, may exhibit as small lymphoid aggregates; and 3 = severe inflammation: synovial intima five to seven or more cells thick, dense cellularity with inflammatory cells, containing many or large perivascular lymphoid aggregates [3]. Representative micrographs of this grading system are presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Representative haematoxylin and eosin micrographs of synovium biopsies taken at osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis total knee arthroplasty. (a-c) Osteoarthritis: (a) category 1 (least inflamed), (b) category 2, and (c) category 3 (most inflamed). I, synovium intima; L, lymphoid body; SV, small vessel; V, villus. (d) Rheumatoid arthritis, category 3. Each biopsy was assigned to one of four categories: 0 = normal: synovial intima less than four cells thick, sparse cellular distribution, with few or no inflammatory cells (not shown as normal synovial fluid samples were not accompanied by synovium biopsies); 1 = mild inflammation: synovial intima three to five cells thick, slight increase in cellularity with few inflammatory cells; 2 = moderate inflammation: synovial intima four to six cells thick, dense cellularity with inflammatory cells, may exhibit as small lymphoid aggregates; 3 = severe inflammation: synovial intima five to seven or more cells thick, dense cellularity with inflammatory cells, containing many or large perivascular lymphoid aggregates. Bar = 100 μm.

Quantification of inflammatory cytokines in synovial fluid

Cytokine profiles in synovial fluid were determined using a BD™ cytometric bead array (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), which quantified IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF, and IL-12p70. Analysis was performed using a Beckman Coulter Epics™ Altra® flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol for measurements in serum or plasma.

Measurement of endocannabinoids

A lipid extraction method was used as previously described [31]. In brief, tissue or fluid was homogenised in an ethyl acetate/hexane mixture with internal standards (0.42 nmol AEA-d8, 1.5 nmol 2-AG-d8, and 0.2 nmol heptadecanoyl ethanolamide) and left in extraction solvent for 2 hours with intermittent mixing. Repeated centrifugation and supernatant collection were then undertaken, followed by purification of samples by solid-phase extraction.

Simultaneous measurement of AEA, 2-AG, OEA, and PEA was then performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A triple quadrupole Quattro Ultima mass spectrometer (Waters Ltd, Manchester, UK) was used in electrospray-positive mode and coupled to an Agilent 1100 LC system (Agilent Technologies, Böblingen, Germany) for analysis. Analytes were chromatographically separated on a HyPurity Advance C8 column (Fisher Scientific UK., Loughborough, UK) with gradient elution. Individual compounds were then identified and quantified with multiple reaction monitoring, using (m/z [mass-to-charge] ratios of specific precursor and product ions) on the mass spectrometer.

Western blotting for measurement of cannabinoid receptor expression

Human synovium samples were homogenised in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, 1 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid [EGTA], 320 mM sucrose, 0.1% Triton X100, 1 mM sodium fluoride, and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Sciences, Burgess Hill, UK). Homogenates were centrifuged at 5,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C and the resulting supernatants were collected. Estimation of protein content was carried out using the Lowry method [32]. Aliquots of the homogenate supernatant were diluted in Laemmli sample buffer, and proteins were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Anti-cannabinoid receptor 1 (Calbiochem, now part of EMD Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), anti-cannabinoid receptor 2 (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), or anti-β-actin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) was incubated overnight at 4°C with nitrocellulose membranes and visualisation using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2,000 dilution; Dako Denmark A/S, Glostrup, Denmark), enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Amersham Biosciences, now part of GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK), and autoradiography. Data were quantified using a Bio-Rad GS 710 imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).

Fatty acid amide hydrolase activity assay

Tissues were homogenised (50 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA [ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid], 3 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 500 g for 5 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatant was subsequently centrifuged for 30 minutes at 35,000 g at 4°C. The pellet obtained was re-suspended in Tris-HCl buffer, and protein content was determined by the method of Lowry.

The FAAH activity of each sample was measured by monitoring the release of [3H]-ethanolamine after incubation of homogenate with radiolabelled AEA ([3H]-AEA). Protein contents per assay were chosen on the basis of preliminary experiments using some of the samples to establish optimal conditions (~88 μg/mL). Homogenised tissue in assay buffer (116 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 25 mM HEPES, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 0.8 mM MgSO4, pH 7.0) was incubated at 37°C with 40 μM [3H]-AEA (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) in the presence of 1 mg/mL fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (200 μL total assay volume), and the reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.4 mL activated charcoal (4% wt/vol in 0.5 M HCl) [33, 34]. A sample without homogenate was processed to determine the extent of non-enzymatic [3H]-AEA hydrolysis. The samples were vortexed and left to sediment for 30 minutes before centrifugation at 11,000 g for 5 minutes to pellet the charcoal and homogenate protein with un-hydrolysed [3H]-AEA. A 200-μL aliquot of the supernatant was counted for tritium content by liquid scintillation spectroscopy. For obtaining standards, an aliquot of the homogenate was incubated without [3H]-AEA and stopped with charcoal as for other samples. After centrifugation, 190 μL of supernatant was added into scintillation vials with 40 μM [3H]-AEA (equivalent to 2 nmol [3H]-AEA/mL) and activity was determined as before.

Preparation and culture of human synovial fibroblast cells

Human synovial samples from both OA and RA patients were chopped and finely digested for 2 hours at 37°C with 2 mg/mL collagenase type H (Sigma-Aldrich) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (PAA Laboratories Ltd, Yeovil, UK, Pasching, Austria), 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 U/mL penicillin, and 50 μg/mL streptomycin and fungizone (Sigma-Aldrich). Samples were occasionally agitated to aid digestion. At the end of the digest, the samples were pipetted up and down to disrupt the tissue and passed through a 100-μm cell strainer (BD Falcon, a trademark of BD Biosciences). The cell suspension was centrifuged at 500 g for 5 minutes at room temperature, and the pellet was re-suspended in complete media, plated into flasks, and allowed to become adherent. Media was replaced the following day to remove any non-adherent cells. Adherent cells were cultured and used between passages 3 and 12.

Immunoblotting of synovial fibroblast for mitogen-activated protein kinase activation

To analyse mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, synovial fibroblast-like cells were stimulated with the CB1/CB2 receptor agonist HU210 (1 μM) in the presence and absence of a 20-hour pre-incubation with pertussis toxin (PTX) for 5, 10, 20, and 40 minutes before analysis of MAPK phosphorylation (described below) to determine a maximum time-dependent effect of HU210 stimulation on MAPK phosphorylation compared with basal, unstimulated levels. In subsequent experiments, synovial fibroblast-like cells were stimulated with HU210 (0.1 μM) in the presence and absence of the CB1 antagonist SR141716A (1 μM) or CB2 antagonist SR144528 (1 μM). Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (Sigma-Aldrich) and lysed (20 mM Tris, 1 mM EGTA, 320 m sucrose, 0.1% Triton X100, 1 mM sodium fluoride, and 80 mM β-glycerophosphate containing protease inhibitor cocktail). After removal of a sample for a protein assay, the homogenate was diluted in Laemmli sample buffer and heated at 95°C for 5 minutes. Equal amounts of protein from each sample were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes for Western blotting. Nitrocellulose blots were incubated overnight at 4°C with an antibody that recognises the double-phosphorylated (activated) forms of both isoforms of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) (p44 ERK1 MAPK and p42 ERK2 MAPK) and p38 MAPK (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). Proteins were subsequently visualised using the ECL system (Amersham Life Sciences, now part of GE Healthcare). Blots were then stripped of antibodies using Restore Western Blot Stripping Buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. These blots were subsequently re-probed with an antibody against total ERK and p38 (New England Biolabs, Inc.). Bands were visualised as before. Data were quantified using the Bio-Rad GS 710 imaging densitometer and represented as a percentage of the unstimulated control.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for CB1 and CB2receptors

Total RNA was isolated from cultured human synovial-like fibroblasts using TRiPure Isolation reagent (Roche Applied Sciences, Burgess Hill, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. As the open reading frame for CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors for humans contains a single exon, the RNA used was treated with recombinant RNase-free DNase-1 (Roche) to remove any genomic DNA contamination and was purified using a standard phenol-chloroform extraction methodology. RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the Transcriptor first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche Applied Sciences, Burgess Hill, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification of CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptor cDNA was achieved by using 'touchdown' polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with a progressive decrease in annealing temperatures from 60°C until touchdown at 55°C [35]. Primers were designed using the Primer Express software package version 3.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Using bioinformatics, the specificities of all primers were confirmed to the desired mRNA of human samples. Primers used were as follows: CB1 forward: 5'-CTGAACTCCACCGTGAACC-3' and reverse: 5'-GTGCTCTTGATGCAGCT-5' and CB2 forward: 5'-CATCTATGCTCTACGGAGTGGAGAG-3' and reverse: 5'-TTGAGTTGTTTAAATTGGGAAGAGG-3' (MWG-Biotech AG, Ebersberg, Germany). The amplified products were separated on a 1.8% low-melting agarose gel (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) stained with ethidium bromide and documented using GeneSnap imaging software (Syngene, Cambridge, UK).

Data analysis

Statistical comparisons of levels of cytokines between normal, OA, and RA samples were performed with a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Comparisons of endocannabinoid (EC) levels between normal, OA, and RA samples were performed with a non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Comparison of FAAH activity between OA and RA synovial tissue was performed using unpaired Student t tests. Comparisons between drug treatment groups in cultured fibroblast-like cell immunoblots were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered a significant difference.

Results

Patient information

All patients had a Kellgren-Lawrence or Larsen radiological score of greater than or equal to 3. The study included 14 male and 18 female OA patients and 1 male and 12 female RA patients. The patients had a similar mean age, and information on drug history prior to TKA is summarised in Table 1. Patients were told to stop taking aspirin and all cytokine inhibitors 10 to 14 days prior to surgery.
Table 1

Summary of patient histories of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients included in the study

 

Osteoarthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis

Gender (number)

Female (18)

Male (14)

Female (12)

Male (1)

Mean age ± standard deviation, years

72 ± 7

70 ± 8

61 ± 11

64

NSAIDs, number (percentage)

8 (44%)

7 (50%)

8 (67%)

0

Paracetamol, number (percentage)

9 (50%)

7 (50%)

9 (75%)

1 (100%)

Corticosteroid, number (percentage)

0

0

8 (67%)

0

NSAIDs, paracetamol or corticosteroid, number (percentage)

12 (67%)

9 (64%)

12 (100%)

1 (100%)

Anti-cytokine therapy, number (percentage)

0

0

1 (8%)

1 (100%)

NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Histology of synovial biopsies and levels of cytokines

Haematoxylin and eosin histology was performed on 26 of the OA and 9 of the RA synovial biopsies to assess the degree of inflammation (Figure 1). None of the OA synovia was characterised as having a normal histological appearance, 4 exhibited mild (score = 1), 12 moderate (score = 2), and 10 severe (score = 3) synovial inflammation. In the case of the RA synovial biopsies, one sample had become fibrotic and devoid of a cellular component and therefore could not be scored. Six of the RA biopsies were described as exhibiting severe synovitis (score = 3) and two as having moderate inflammation (score = 2).

In addition to assessing the degree of degeneration of the synovium of the patients included in this study, levels of inflammatory cytokines in the synovial fluid of these patients were quantified. Levels of cytokines (IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF, and IL-12) were assayed in 17 of the OA synovial fluid samples, 6 RA samples, and 6 samples from patients with no clinical symptoms (described as normal). In general, levels of cytokines were higher in the synovial samples from RA patients compared with OA and normal samples (Figure 2) and there was a large spread of data in the RA group. Statistical comparison between levels of cytokines in the three groups revealed that levels of IL-6 were significantly higher in the RA (P < 0.01) and OA (P < 0.05) samples compared with normal synovial fluid samples (Figure 2). There were no significant differences between levels of the other cytokines for the three groups.
Figure 2

Comparison of levels of cytokines in synovial fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 6) and osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 17) and from non-inflamed normal volunteers (normal) (n = 6). Levels of interleukin (IL)-6 were significantly higher in RA and OA groups (P < 0.05 for both) compared with the normal group (Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test and Dunn multiple comparison post hoc test). Lines represent median values. TNF, tumour necrosis factor.

Cannabinoid receptors are expressed in human synovial tissue from osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients

The expression of cannabinoid receptors in human synovial tissue obtained from OA and RA patients was assessed. Immunoblotting for CB1 receptor protein in human synovial tissue detected a major band at about 63 kDa, consistent with previous reports (Figure 3a) [36–39]. The expression of CB2 receptor protein was also detected in synovial tissue by Western blotting. Three bands probably representing different glycosolation states, at about 40, 55, and 60 kDa (Figure 3a), were detected in a pattern similar to that previously reported for spleen, brainstem, and cerebellum [40]. Processing immunoblots without primary antibody or pre-absorbing with antigenic peptide abolished the identified bands (data not shown). CHO-K1 cells recombinantly expressing either the human CB2 receptor or human CB1 receptor protein were used as a positive control. There were no significant differences between levels of expression of CB1 and CB2 receptor proteins in synovial tissue from OA (n = 4) and RA (n = 4) patients. To further strengthen the evidence for CB1 and CB2 receptor expression in synovial tissue from OA and RA patients, touchdown PCR was used to detect RNA for CB1 and CB2 receptors. CB1 and CB2 RNA was observed in all human synovial fibroblast-like synovial cells analysed with a product size of 201 base pairs, as predicted (Figure 3b). The human neuroblastoma cell line SHSY-5Y, which endogenously expresses CB1 cannabinoid receptors [41], and CHO-K1 cells recombinantly expressing human CB2 cannabinoid receptors were used as positive controls. The lack of amplification in non-template controls and in the absence of reverse transcriptase indicates the absence of any contamination or amplification of genomic DNA (data not shown).
Figure 3

Expression of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) (a) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) (b) receptor protein in synovial tissue of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) (lanes 2 to 5) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (lanes 6 to 8) detected by Western blotting and quantified by densitometry. CHO-K1 cells recombinantly expressing either CB1 or CB2 receptor were used as a positive control (lane 1). Receptor expression was calculated as a percentage of expression of the internal control, β-actin. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean of the expression of CB1 and CB2 protein in four OA and four RA patients, assessed in three separate experiments. Expression of CB1 (c) and CB2 (d) receptor RNA in fibroblast-like synovial cells derived from tissue of patients with OA or RA detected by 'touchdown' polymerase chain reaction. A human neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y) endogenously expressing CB1 cannabinoid receptor and CHO-K1 cells recombinantly expressing CB2 receptor were used as positive controls, respectively. bp, base pairs.

Determination of fatty acid amide hydrolase activity in human synovial tissue

Membrane fragments prepared from synovial tissue were assayed for determining FAAH activity. A rat liver membrane preparation, previously demonstrated to be rich in FAAH activity, was used as a positive control [42]. The selective FAAH inhibitor URB597 (3'-(aminocarbonyl) [1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-cyclohexylcarbamate) (1 μM) virtually abolished activity in this tissue (Table 2). Although FAAH activity was much lower in synovium, activity was measurable in tissue from OA and RA patients (Table 2). There were no significant differences in FAAH activity between synovial tissue from OA and RA patients. Incubation of samples with URB597 (1 μM) also markedly reduced FAAH activity (Table 2) in the synovium [43].
Table 2

Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) activity in synovial tissue from osteoarthritis (n = 5) and rheumatoid arthritis (n = 4) patients

 

FAAH activity (pmol/minute/mg protein)

Tissue

Control

+ URB597

Osteoarthritis synovium

2.8 ± 0.46

Undetectable

Rheumatoid arthritis synovium

1.6 ± 0.42

Undetectable

Rat liver

988 ± 84

1.28 ± 0.51

FAAH activity was measured by monitoring the release of [3H]-ethanolamine after incubation of homogenates with [3H]-anandamide. Each sample was processed in three separate experiments. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. URB597, 3'-(aminocarbonyl) [1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-cyclohexylcarbamate.

Endocannabinoid levels in synovium tissue and synovial fluid in normal, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis samples

The synovial tissue from OA and RA patients was used to measure endocannabinoid and entourage compounds. AEA, 2-AG, OEA, and PEA were detected and quantified in all samples analysed (Figure 4). Comparison of OA and RA tissue showed no significant differences in levels of AEA, 2-AG, OEA, or PEA.
Figure 4

Levels of the endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA), 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG), palmitoyl ethanolamide (PEA), and oleoyl ethanolamide (OEA) in the synovia of patients with either osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 14) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 6). Data were analysed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and are expressed as picomoles per gram.

Endocannabinoids and entourage compounds were measured in control synovial fluid from normal volunteers with no joint symptoms as well as in synovial fluid from OA and RA patients (Figure 5). AEA and 2-AG were not detected in the normal synovial fluid samples (below the lower limit of quantification of 0.3 pmol/mL). By contrast, significant levels of OEA and high levels of PEA were detected in these normal samples (Figure 5). Consistent with synovial tissue, AEA, 2-AG, OEA, and PEA were detected in synovial fluid samples taken from the same OA and RA patients (Figure 5). In contrast to the high levels of PEA in synovial fluid samples of normal volunteers, levels were greatly reduced in OA and RA samples. In addition, there was a trend toward a reduction in levels of OEA in OA and RA samples compared with control synovial fluid samples, although this did not reach statistical significance. Comparison of levels of endocannabinoid and entourage compounds in the synovial fluid versus synovia of OA and RA patients revealed that, generally, levels were lower (per millilitre of fluid) in the fluid compared with the synovial tissue (per gram of tissue).
Figure 5

Levels of the endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA), 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG), palmitoyl ethanolamide (PEA), and oleoyl ethanolamide (OEA) in synovial fluid of non-inflamed normal volunteers (control) (n = 6) and of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 14) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 5). Data were analysed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and are expressed as picomoles per millilitre. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005 compared with control values. ▽ P < 0.05 compared with OA values. ND, not detected below a limit of detection of 0.3 pmol/mL.

Effects of HU-210 on ERK1, ERK2, and p38 MAPK activation in fibroblast-like cells

Levels of phosphorylated and total ERK1, ERK2 (p44 and p42, respectively), and p38 MAPK were measured in fibroblast-like cells from OA and RA patients, derived from the synovial tissue, by Western blotting. Given the comparable levels of expression of CB1 and CB2 receptor protein in OA and RA samples, we combined RA and OA cells to maximise cell yield for these pharmacological experiments. The non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonist HU210 (1 μM) produced a time-dependent phosphorylation of ERK1, ERK2, and p38 MAPK, indicating an increase in ERK and p38 activity which peaked at 10 minutes after stimulation (Figure 6). Levels of total ERK1, ERK2, and p38 were unaffected by HU210 (data not shown). Pre-treatment of fibroblast-like cells with PTX, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates Gαi/o, decreased HU210-induced phosphorylation. The effect of PTX was significant for p38 activation after a 10-minute stimulation with HU210 (P < 0.05); although PTX showed a tendency to decrease HU210-induced activation of ERK1 and ERK2, significance was not reached. These data suggest a role for a Gαi/o-coupled receptor mediating the effects of HU210 on ERK1, ERK2, and p38 activation (Figure 6). To further investigate the role of the cannabinoid receptors in mediating the effects of HU210 on phosphorylation of ERK1, ERK2, and p38 MAPK, the potential ability of the CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists SR141716A and SR144528 to block the effects of HU210 (0.1 μM) was studied. The CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (1 μM) significantly attenuated HU210 (0.1 μM)-induced phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 in fibroblast-like cells (Figure 7). Although the CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528 (1 μM) tended to attenuate HU210 (0.1 μM)-induced phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 in fibroblast-like cells, significance was not reached (Figure 7). Levels of total ERK1 and ERK2 were unaffected by the drug treatments (Figure 7a). HU210-induced phosphorylation of p38 MAPK was not significantly attenuated by the CB1 or CB2 receptor antagonist (data not shown). Overall, these pharmacological studies provide strong support for functionally coupled cannabinoid receptors in the fibroblast-like cells derived from synovia from OA and RA patients.
Figure 6

HU210 (1 μM) induces a time-dependent increase in (a) p44 (ERK1), (b) p42 (ERK2), and (c) p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation (filled bars) in fibroblast-like cells derived from the synovia of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis compared with basal levels. Pre-incubation (20 hours) of cells with pertussis toxin (PTX) attenuated HU210-induced phosphorylation. Data are presented as mean percentage of unstimulated basal MAPK phosphorylation levels ± standard error of the mean (n = 3 synovia). Comparisons between groups were made using one-way analysis of variance. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus basal levels, φ P < 0.05 versus corresponding PTX-stimulated time point. ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.

Figure 7

Pre-incubation of fibroblast-like cells with the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) antagonist SR141716A (1 μM) for 10 minutes prior to exposure to HU210 (for a further 10 minutes, 0.1 μM) significantly blocked HU210-induced phosphorylation of p44 (ERK1) and p42 (ERK2). The cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) antagonist SR144528 (1 μM) did not significantly alter HU210-induced phosphorylation of p44 (ERK1) and p42 (ERK2). Data are expressed as (a) immunoblots with levels of phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in the top band and total loading of protein below and as (b) mean percentage of the unstimulated basal levels of MAPK phosphorylation ± standard error of the mean (n = 3 synovia). Comparison between drug treatment groups was carried out using one-way analysis of variance. **P < 0.05 versus HU210. ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.

Discussion

The novel finding of the present study is the identification of the key components of the cannabinoid receptor system in the knee synovia of patients with end-stage OA and RA. We have demonstrated, for the first time, the presence of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor message and protein. The functional relevance of the presence of these receptors has been confirmed by pharmacological studies demonstrating cannabinoid agonist-induced phosphorylation of the downstream signalling targets (ERK1 and ERK2) in fibroblast-like cells derived from OA and RA patients. The endocannabinoids, plus associated entourage compounds and FAAH activity, were present in the synovia of both OA and RA patients. In addition, we have demonstrated that AEA and 2-AG are also present in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients but are not detectable in synovial fluid taken from volunteers with no joint symptoms. Our data provide evidence for a functional endocannabinoid receptor system in OA and RA patients.

All synovia used in the present study were collected from RA and OA patients with end-stage disease undergoing TKA for severe pain. Histological analysis verified that the synovia were not normal. Both the OA and RA synovia exhibited either moderate or severe inflammation. Moderate or severe synovitis was classified as the intima layer being more than four cells deep, plus dense cellularity of subintimal tissue due to increased numbers of fibroblastic cells and inflammatory cells, including lymphoid aggregates [3, 44, 45]. In general, the number of lymphoid aggregates and cell depth of the synovial intima are greater, or more extensive, in RA than OA synovium [46, 47]. All of the RA and OA patients whose samples were used in this study exhibited severe disease and there were no significant differences between levels of cytokines in RA and OA samples studied. Levels of IL-6, however, were significantly higher in OA and RA samples compared with volunteers with no joint symptoms. IL-6 is an important driver of inflammation in RA [48] and all of the synovia, whether RA or OA, were inflamed in our study. IL-6 is also implicated in the induction of osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption [49], and all of our patients had bone-on-bone changes somewhere within their arthritic knees, reflecting the severity of end-stage disease requiring joint replacement surgery. Reported levels of IL-6 [50, 51] and IL-8 [51, 52] are in keeping with earlier reports in OA and RA.

Although it may be expected that levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines would be higher in RA samples, all of the patients had taken anti-arthritis medicines, which could affect levels of cytokines and possibly endocannabinoids. As a result of the different requirements for sample preparation and the amount of synovia available, not all of the synovia could be used for all of the experimental studies. Given the wide range of cytokine levels present in OA and RA samples, we have studied the cannabinoid receptor system in groups of OA and RA samples which represent a cross-section of the population in terms of levels of cytokines, ensuring that our data were not subject to bias. Due to difficulties in recruiting male RA subjects, only one was included in the study, but similarities between the extent of disease in the male and female subjects and the lack of significant difference between cytokine levels in RA and OA samples suggest that this should not confound our data.

Here, we report the presence of both the CB1 and CB2 receptors in the synovia of patients with end-stage OA and RA, suggesting that this system may play a role in these pathological conditions. Our pharmacological study demonstrating that the potent cannabinoid agonist HU210 phosphorylates ERK1 and ERK2 in fibroblast-like synovial cells in a PTX-dependent manner via the CB1 receptor lends further support to a functional role of this receptor system in OA and RA synovia. Although there was a trend toward an attenuation of the effects of HU210 by the CB2 receptor antagonist, significance was not reached. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that activation of CB1 receptors, both on peripheral nerves and at spinal and supraspinal sites, produces analgesic effects in models of acute and inflammatory pain [53–55]. By contrast, CB2 receptors are associated predominantly with immune cells (see Introduction). Although, in the present study, the cellular location of the cannabinoid receptors has not been identified, the demonstration that cannabinoid receptors are coupled to the MAPK signalling pathway in fibroblast-like cells prepared from OA and RA synovia indicates that these cells are a likely location for the cannabinoid receptors identified.

The two main endocannabinoids, AEA and 2-AG, were present in the synovia of OA and RA patients at levels in keeping with those previously reported in other biological tissues. The fatty acid amides PEA and OEA [56] were also detected in both OA and RA synovia. PEA is of particular interest since it has anti-inflammatory activity [57] via nuclear PPAR-α (peroxisome proliferator activating receptor-α) activation and possibly endocannabinoid entourage effects. Unfortunately, it was not possible to obtain non-diseased synovia and, therefore, a comparison of levels of ECs in normal synovium with OA and RA samples was not possible. However, we were able to compare levels of endocannabinoids in the synovial fluid, which contains immune cells that are capable of releasing endocannabinoids [9], of OA and RA patients compared with normal volunteers. AEA and 2-AG were present in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients, but not in normal controls. Levels of 2-AG were significantly lower in the RA group compared with the OA group. Levels of PEA were significantly lower in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients compared with that of non-inflamed normal volunteers. Since PEA has a well-described anti-inflammatory role, the reported lower levels of PEA in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients may contribute to the disease process associated with these conditions. Given that AEA, PEA, and OEA are all substrates for FAAH, the opposing impact of OA/RA on levels of these compounds suggests that these changes are not due merely to alterations in FAAH-mediated metabolism and argues against an important contribution of the entourage effect. Levels of FAAH activity were comparable in OA and RA samples. Although activity of FAAH in the synovium was low relative to the liver, it was comparable to levels previously described in rat hindpaw [34]. FAAH activity was undetectable in the presence of pharmacological blockade of FAAH by the well-characterised inhibitor of URB597 [58], indicating the functional relevance of this activity. On the basis of our FAAH activity data, changes in rates of synthesis or release of AEA and 2-AG, versus PEA and OEA, in OA and RA patients compared with non-inflamed normal volunteers are more likely to account for our data.

In some cases, the relative levels of endocannabinoids and related fatty acid amides in the synovial fluid did not mirror levels in the synovia of OA and RA patients. Levels of 2-AG in the synovial fluid of RA patients were significantly lower than levels in OA patients, whereas there were no differences in levels of 2-AG in the synovia of OA and RA patients. In addition, levels of PEA were non-significantly higher in RA synovium compared with OA synovium, but levels of PEA were similar in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients. Thus, levels in the synovial fluid do not simply reflect the level of synthesis/release and catabolism of endocannabinoids and entourage compounds in the synovium. The source of the endocannabinoids present in the synovium and synovial fluid is an important consideration. Endocannabinoids are synthesised by numerous different cell types, including immune cells such as T cells and macrophages, which are the major immune cells present in OA and RA [47, 59, 60]. Since endothelial cells can synthesise AEA [61] and 2-AG [62], another possible source of endocannabinoids in the synovium is the vasculature. The role of vascular elements in the progression of arthritic disease is important, particularly since neovascularisation is one of the early changes in the synovium and it is thought that bone and cartilage destruction is closely linked to angiogenesis [63] and cannabinoids inhibit angiogenesis in tumours [37, 64].

Conclusion

In summary, cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor protein and RNA and the endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG are present in the synovia of patients with end-stage OA and RA. The presence of increased levels of AEA and 2-AG in the synovial fluid of OA and RA patients, compared with non-inflamed normal volunteers, suggests a greater functional role of the endocannabinoid receptor system in these patients. Importantly, levels of the anti-inflammatory substance PEA were higher in the synovial fluid of normal volunteers compared with OA and RA patients and, therefore, the loss of PEA may contribute to arthritic disease. Our data predict that the cannabinoid receptor system may be an important therapeutic target for the treatment of pain and inflammation associated with these conditions.

Notes

Abbreviations

2-AG: 

2-arachidonyl glycerol

AEA: 

anandamide

CB1: 

cannabinoid receptor 1

CB2: 

cannabinoid receptor 2

COX: 

cyclooxygenase

EC: 

endocannabinoid

EGTA: 

ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid

ERK: 

extracellular signal-regulated kinase

FAAH: 

fatty acid amide hydrolase

IL: 

interleukin

MAPK: 

mitogen-activated protein kinase

NSAID: 

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

OA: 

osteoarthritis

OEA: 

oleoyl ethanolamide

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

PEA: 

palmitoyl ethanolamide

PTX: 

pertussis toxin

RA: 

rheumatoid arthritis

TKA: 

total knee arthroplasty

TNF: 

tumour necrosis factor

URB597 = 3'-(aminocarbonyl) [1: 

1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-cyclohexylcarbamate.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the University of Nottingham Queen's Medical Centre Special Trustees Fund and GlaxoSmithKline (Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK). DR is supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council studentship. The authors thank Michael Doherty for providing the synovial fluid specimens originating from volunteers with normal knee joints, Adrian Robins for the use of flow cytometry, Julie Swales for performing the cytometric bead array assay (Immunology, School of Molecular Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham), and Mauro Dionisi (School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham) for assistance with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Analytical Bioscience, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
(2)
Division of Orthopaedic and Accident Surgery, School of Medical Surgical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
(3)
School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
(4)
Neurology Centre of Excellence for Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Harlow, UK

References

  1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B: Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003, 81: 646-656.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonnet CS, Walsh DA: Osteoarthritis, angiogenesis and inflammation. Rheumatology. 2005, 44: 7-16. 10.1093/rheumatology/keh344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Haywood L, McWilliams DF, Pearson CI, Gill SE, Ganesan A, Wilson D, Walsh DA: Inflammation and angiogenesis in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48: 2173-2177. 10.1002/art.11094.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sowers M, Jannausch M, Stein E, Jamadar D, Hochberg M, Lachance L: C-reactive protein as a biomarker of emergent osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2002, 10: 595-601. 10.1053/joca.2002.0800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Spector TD, Hart DJ, Nandra D, Doyle DV, Mackillop N, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB: Low-level increases in serum C-reactive protein are present in early osteoarthritis of the knee and predict progressive disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40: 723-727. 10.1002/art.1780400419.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee DM, Weinblatt ME: Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet North Am Ed. 2001, 358: 903-911.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Maini RN: Role of cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996, 14: 397-440. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.397.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mackie K: Cannabinoid receptors as therapeutic targets. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006, 46: 101-122. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Croxford JL, Yamamura T: Cannabinoids and the immune system: potential for the treatment of inflammatory diseases?. J Neuroimmunol. 2005, 166: 3-18. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.04.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Elmes SJR, Jhaveri MD, Smart D, Kendall DA, Chapman V: Cannabinoid CB2 receptor activation inhibits mechanically evoked responses of wide dynamic range dorsal horn neurons in naive rats and in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Eur J Neurosci. 2004, 20: 2311-2320. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03690.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Elmes SJR, Winyard LA, Medhurst SJ, Clayton NM, Wilson AW, Kendall DA, Chapman V: Activation of CB1 and CB2 receptors attenuates the induction and maintenance of inflammatory pain in the rat. Pain. 2005, 118: 327-335. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nackley AG, Zvonok AM, Makriyannis A, Hohmann AG: Activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors suppresses C-fiber responses and windup in spinal wide dynamic range neurons in the absence and presence of inflammation. J Neurophysiol. 2004, 92: 3562-3574. 10.1152/jn.00886.2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Quartilho A, Mata HP, Ibrahim MM, Vanderah TW, Porreca F, Makriyannis A, Malan TP: Inhibition of inflammatory hyperalgesia by activation of peripheral CB2 cannabinoid receptors. Anesthesiology. 2003, 99: 955-960. 10.1097/00000542-200310000-00031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith FL, Fujimori K, Lowe J, Welch SP: Characterization of [Delta]9-tetrahydrocannabinol and anandamide antinociception in nonarthritic and arthritic rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998, 60: 183-191. 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00583-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Blake DR, Robson P, Ho M, Jubb RW, McCabe CS: Preliminary assessment of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of a cannabis-based medicine (Sativex) in the treatment of pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2006, 45: 50-52. 10.1093/rheumatology/kei183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pertwee RG, Ross RA: Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2002, 66: 101-121. 10.1054/plef.2001.0341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein TW, Lane B, Newton CA, Friedman H: The cannabinoid system and cytokine network. Exp Biol Med. 2000, 225: 1-8. 10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22501.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G, Gibson D, Mandelbaum A, Etinger A, Mechoulam R: Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science. 1992, 258: 1946-1949. 10.1126/science.1470919.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sugiura T, Kondo S, Sukagawa A, Nakane S, Sindo A, Itoh K, Yamashita A, Waku K: 2-arachidonoylglycerol: a possible endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand in brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995, 215: 89-97. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2437.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mechoulam R, Fride E, Di Marzo V: Endocannabinoids. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998, 359: 1-18. 10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00649-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lambert DM, Di Marzo V: The palmitoylethanolamide and oleamide enigmas: are these two fatty acid amides cannabimimetic?. Curr Med Chem. 1999, 6: 757-773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cravatt BF, Demarest K, Patricelli MP, Bracey MH, Giang DK, Martin BR, Lichtman AH: Supersensitivity to anandamide and enhanced endogenous cannabinoid signalling in mice lacking fatty acid amide hydrolase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 9371-9376. 10.1073/pnas.161191698.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jhaveri MD, Richardson D, Chapman V: Endocannabinoid metabolism and uptake: novel targets for neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Br J Pharmacol. 2007, 152: 624-632. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707433.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ofek O, Karsak M, Leclerc N, Fogel M, Frenkel B, Wright K, Tam J, Attar-Namdar M, Kram V, Shohami E, Mechoulam R, Zimmer A, Bab I: Peripheral cannabinoid receptor, CB2, regulates bone mass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 696-701. 10.1073/pnas.0504187103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Idris AI, van 't Hof RJ, Greig IR, Ridge SA, Baker D, Ross RA, Ralston SH: Regulation of bone mass, bone loss and osteoclast activity by cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med. 2005, 11: 774-779. 10.1038/nm1255.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fowler CJ, Holt S, Tiger G: Acidic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit rat brain fatty acid amide hydrolase in a pH-dependent manner. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2003, 18: 55-58. 10.1080/1475636021000049726.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fowler CJ, Janson U, Johnson RM, Wahlstrom G, Stenstrom A, Norstrom K, Tiger G: Inhibition of anandamide hydrolysis by the enantiomers of ibuprofen, ketorolac, and flurbiprofen. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1999, 362: 191-196. 10.1006/abbi.1998.1025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Guindon J, Beaulieu P: Antihyperalgesic effects of local injections of anandamide, ibuprofen, rofecoxib and their combinations in a model of neuropathic pain. Neuropharmacology. 2006, 50: 814-823. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS: Osteo-arthrosis and disk degeneration in an urban population. Ann Rheum Dis. 1958, 17: 388-397.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Larsen A: How to apply Larsen score in evaluating radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis in long-term studies. J Rheumatol. 1995, 22: 1974-1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Richardson D, Ortori CA, Chapman V, Kendall DA, Barrett DA: Quantitative profiling of endocannabinoids and related compounds in rat brain using liquid chromatography-tandem electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2007, 360: 216-226. 10.1016/j.ab.2006.10.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951, 193: 265-275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Boldrup L, Wilson SJ, Barbier AJ, Fowler CJ: A simple stopped assay for fatty acid amide hydrolase avoiding the use of a chloroform extraction phase. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2004, 60: 171-177. 10.1016/j.jbbm.2004.04.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Holt S, Comelli F, Costa B, Fowler CJ: Inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase reduce carrageenan-induced hind paw inflammation in pentobarbital-treated mice: comparison with indomethacin and possible involvement of cannabinoid receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2005, 146: 467-476. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706348.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS: 'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19: 4008-10.1093/nar/19.14.4008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Matias I, Pochard P, Orlando P, Salzet M, Pestel J, Di Marzo V: Presence and regulation of the endocannabinoid system in human dendritic cells. Eur J Biochem. 2002, 269: 3771-3778. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03078.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Porcella A, Marchese G, Casu MA, Rocchitta A, Lai ML, Gessa GL, Pani L: Evidence for functional CB1 cannabinoid receptor expressed in the rat thyroid. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002, 147: 255-261. 10.1530/eje.0.1470255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Song C, Howlett AC: Rat brain cannabinoid receptors are N-linked glycosylated proteins. Life Sci. 1995, 56: 1983-1989. 10.1016/0024-3205(95)00179-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wager-Miller J, Westenbroek R, Mackie K: Dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors: CB1 cannabinoid receptors as an example. Chem Phys Lipids. 2002, 121: 83-89. 10.1016/S0009-3084(02)00151-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Sickle MD, Duncan M, Kingsley PJ, Mouihate A, Urbani P, Mackie K, Stella N, Makriyannis A, Piomelli D, Davison JS, Marnett LJ, Di Marzo V, Pittman QJ, Patel KD, Sharkey KA: Identification and functional characterization of brainstem cannabinoid CB2 receptors. Science. 2005, 310: 329-332. 10.1126/science.1115740.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Klegeris A, Bissonnette CJ, McGeer PL: Reduction of human monocytic cell neurotoxicity and cytokine secretion by ligands of the cannabinoid-type CB2 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2003, 139: 775-786. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705304.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. De Bank PA, Kendall DA, Alexander SP: A spectrophotometric assay for fatty acid amide hydrolase suitable for high-throughput screening. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005, 69: 1187-1193. 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mor M, Rivara S, Lodola A, Plazzi PV, Tarzia G, Duranti A, Tontini A, Piersanti G, Kathuria S, Piomelli D: Cyclohexylcarbamic acid 3'- or 4'-substituted biphenyl-3-yl esters as fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors: synthesis, quantitative structure-activity relationships, and molecular modeling studies. J Med Chem. 2004, 47: 4998-5008. 10.1021/jm031140x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Baeten D, Demetter P, Cuvelier C, Bosch Van den F, Kruithof E, Van Damme N, Verbruggen G, Mielants H, Veys EM, De Keyser F: Comparative study of the synovial histology in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, and osteoarthritis: influence of disease duration and activity. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000, 59: 945-953. 10.1136/ard.59.12.945.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bresnihan B, Cunnane G, Youssef P, Yanni G, Fitzgerald O, Mulherin D: Microscopic measurement of synovial membrane inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis: proposals for the evaluation of tissue samples by quantitative analysis. Br J Rheumatol. 1998, 37: 636-642. 10.1093/rheumatology/37.6.636.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Farahat MN, Yanni G, Poston R, Panayi GS: Cytokine expression in synovial membranes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993, 52: 870-875.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tak PP, Thurkow EW, Daha MR, Kluin PM, Smeets TJM, Meinders AE, Breedveld FC: Expression of adhesion molecules in early rheumatoid synovial tissue. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1995, 77: 236-242. 10.1006/clin.1995.1149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Maini RN, Taylor PC, Szechinski J, Pavelka K, Bröll J, Balint G, Emery P, Raemen F, Petersen J, Smolen J, Thomson D, Kishimoto T, CHARISMA Study Group: Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of the interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, tocilizumab, in European patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an incomplete response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54: 2817-2829. 10.1002/art.22033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kotake S, Sato K, Kim KJ, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Nakamura I, Yamaguchi A, Kishimoto T, Suda T, Kashiwazaki S: Interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptors in the synovial fluids from rheumatoid arthritis patients are responsible for osteoclast-like cell formation. J Bone Miner Res. 1996, 11: 88-95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Manicourt DH, Poilvache P, Van Egeren A, Devogelaer JP, Lenz ME, Thonar EJ: Synovial fluid levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha and oncostatin M correlate with levels of markers of the degradation of crosslinked collagen and cartilage aggrecan in rheumatoid arthritis but not in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43: 281-288. 10.1002/1529-0131(200002)43:2<281::AID-ANR7>3.0.CO;2-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Raza K, Falciani F, Curnow SJ, Ross E, Lee CY, Akbar A, Lord J, Gordon C, Buckley C, Salmon M: Early rheumatoid arthritis is characterized by a distinct and transient synovial fluid cytokine profile of T cell and stromal cell origin. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005, 7: R784-795. 10.1186/ar1733.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. McNearney T, Baethge BA, Cao S, Alam R, Lisse JR, Westlund KN: Excitatory amino acids, TNF-alpha, and chemokine levels in synovial fluids of patients with active arthropathies. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004, 137: 621-627. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02563.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Drew LJ, Harris J, Millns PJ, Kendall DA, Chapman V: Activation of spinal cannabinoid 1 receptors inhibits C-fibre driven hyperexcitable neuronal responses and increases [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord of noninflamed and inflamed rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2000, 12: 2079-2086. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00101.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Finn DP, Jhaveri MD, Beckett SRG, Roe CH, Kendall DA, Marsden CA, Chapman V: Effects of direct periaqueductal grey administration of a cannabinoid receptor agonist on nociceptive and aversive responses in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2003, 45: 594-604. 10.1016/S0028-3908(03)00235-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kelly S, Chapman V: Cannabinoid CB1 receptor inhibition of mechanically evoked responses of spinal neurones in control rats, but not in rats with hindpaw inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003, 474: 209-216. 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)02085-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. LoVerme J, Fu J, Astarita G, La Rana G, Russo R, Calignano A, Piomelli D: The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha mediates the anti-inflammatory actions of palmitoylethanolamide. Mol Pharmacol. 2005, 67: 15-19. 10.1124/mol.104.006353.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Lambert DM, Vandevoorde S, Jonsson KO, Fowler CJ: The palmitoylethanolamide family: a new class of anti-inflammatory agents?. Curr Med Chem. 2002, 9: 663-674.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Fegley D, Gaetani S, Duranti A, Tontini A, Mor M, Tarzia G, Piomelli D: Characterization of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor cyclohexyl carbamic acid 3'-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl ester (URB597): effects on anandamide and oleoylethanolamide deactivation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005, 313: 352-358. 10.1124/jpet.104.078980.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Haynes MK, Hume EL, Smith JB: Phenotypic characterization of inflammatory cells from osteoarthritic synovium and synovial fluids. Clin Immunol. 2002, 105: 315-325. 10.1006/clim.2002.5283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Smeets TJ, Dolhain RJ, Breedveld FC, Tak PP: Analysis of the cellular infiltrates and expression of cytokines in synovial tissue from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and reactive arthritis. J Pathol. 1998, 186: 75-81. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199809)186:1<75::AID-PATH142>3.0.CO;2-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Deutsch DG, Goligorsky MS, Schmid PC, Krebsbach RJ, Schmid HH, Das SK, Dey SK, Arreaza G, Thorup C, Stefano G, Moore LC: Production and physiological actions of anandamide in the vasculature of the rat kidney. J Clin Invest. 1997, 100: 1538-1546. 10.1172/JCI119677.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Sugiura T, Kodaka T, Nakane S, Kishimoto S, Kondo S, Waku K: Detection of an endogenous cannabimimetic molecule, 2-Arachidonoylglycerol, and cannabinoid CB1 receptor mRNA in human vascular cells: is 2-Arachidonoylglycerol a possible vasomodulator?. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 243: 838-843. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Maruotti N, Cantatore FP, Crivellato E, Vacca A, Ribatti D: Angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Histol Histopathol. 2006, 21: 557-566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Casanova ML, Blázquez C, Martínez-Palacio J, Villanueva C, Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Huffman JW, Jorcano JL, Guzmán M: Inhibition of skin tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo by activation of cannabinoid receptors. J Clin Invest. 2003, 111: 43-50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Richardson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us