Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Baseline urate level and renal function predict outcomes of urate-lowering therapy using low doses of febuxostat and benzbromarone: a prospective, randomized controlled study in a Chinese primary gout cohort

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 21, Article number: 200 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Low doses of febuxostat or benzbromarone are widely used in Asian countries, but lacking studies to compare the efficacy and safety of the two urate-lowering drugs.

Methods

To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose febuxostat with low-dose benzbromarone in patients with primary gout, a randomized controlled, open-label trial was performed among male patients with primary gout for urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in a dedicated gout clinic in China. Randomization was carried out by a third-party institution according to random number table. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to febuxostat group (Feb group) (20 mg daily) or benzbromarone group (Ben group) (25 mg daily) and treated for 12 weeks. General information and biochemical data were collected at baseline and at every visit monthly. Clinical characteristics before and after the ULT were analyzed in the two groups by SPSS and EmpowerStats software.

Results

Two hundred forty patients were enrolled and randomized in the two groups, with 214 patients completing 12 weeks’ ULT (105 in the Feb group and 109 in the Ben group). After 12 weeks, substantial percentages of patients in both Feb and Ben group achieved the target serum uric acid (sUA) (< 360 μmol/L) and serum urate levels were reduced significantly for both groups (Feb 39.5% and 156.83 μmol/L vs. Ben 35.7% and 163.99 μmol/L). Multivariate analysis suggests baseline sUA level and renal function were associated with the outcome of the rate of achieving target sUA (RAT). Sub-group analysis suggests low doses of febuxostat and benzbromarone rendered better RAT for patients with sUA < 540 μmol/L and creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) ≤ 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 at baseline. The drugs were well tolerated, and the incidence of gout flares in Feb group was similar with that in Ben group (22.85% vs. 33.94%).

Conclusion

Overall, febuxostat 20 mg daily and benzbromarone 25 mg daily reduced sUA, and gout patients with sUA level < 540 μmol/L or Ccr ≤ 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 at baseline had better chance to achieve target uric acid levels. The current study suggests sUA level and renal function are key factors to consider when recommending low doses of febuxostat and benzbromarone to gout patients.

Trial registration

Registered with ChiCTR, No. ChiCTR1800019352 (retrospectively registered).

Background

Gout has been the most common inflammatory arthritis worldwide [1], which is characterized by the formation and deposition of monosodium urate crystals in joints and the consequent inflammation or erosion around the victim joints [2]. Patients with gout often present comorbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hyperuricemia is the prelude of all these conditions, including gout [3,4,5,6,7]. The management of hyperuricemia thus plays a key role in the treatment of gout and, potentially, of its comorbidities. A series of guidelines recommend target serum uric acid (sUA) levels of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) are 360 μmol/L (6 mg/L) in moderate gout and 300 μmol/L (5 mg/L) in severe gout [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].

For the sake of preventing second gout attack induced by unstable sUA levels and avoiding unwanted side effects of high dose ULT drugs, “start low go slow” strategy with low-dose initiation of ULT drugs and gentle dosage escalation is recommended in ULT [13,14,15,16]. Particularly, we focused on two drugs here: xanthine oxidase inhibitor febuxostat and uricosuric agent benzbromarone. In the case of febuxostat, FDA approves 40 mg and 80 mg, which are widely adopted in the guidelines of American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism. But 20 mg, even 10 mg, is widely used in clinical practice in particular in Asian countries [17]. Benzbromarone was approved for use in Europe and Asia, but was not licensed in the USA. In contrast to Europe or British guidelines, most Asian consensus or guidelines recommend benzbromarone as first-line ULT and 50 mg is the most common recommended starting dose [13, 15, 16]. However, 25 mg as starting dose is common in clinical practice of gout management in Asia and was recommended in Chinese expert consensus [13]. So far, a number of studies have shown “start low go slow” dosing strategies can achieve satisfactory rates of achieving targets among Asian patients for both febuxostat and benzbromarone [18,19,20]. However, clinical studies observing the effectiveness and safety of low-dose febuxostat or benzbromarone in ULT of the primary gout patients are lacking.

Overall, the current study aimed to address the following: (1) general effectiveness and safety of low-dose febuxostat (20 mg) and benzbromarone (25 mg) in Chinese primary gouty patients and (2) explore the clinical parameters which may influence the rate of achieving target sUA (RAT) or adverse events when applying low doses of febuxostat and benzbromarone. Therefore, we performed this randomized controlled, open-label study to compare febuxostat (20 mg/day) with benzbromarone (25 mg/day) on the efficacy and safety in ULT in a Chinese primary gout cohort. We hypothesized that this study might provide clues in choosing the right drug, at a right dosage, for right patients.

Patients and methods

Patients enrollment

We screened patients who visited the dedicated Gout Clinic of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The male patients who had diagnosed with primary gout based on the 2015 ACR/EULAR criteria [21] with fasting uric acid ≥ 420 μmol/L were enrolled. The patients were excluded for any of the following reasons: having a recent gout attack or taking any urate-lowering drugs or other medicine affecting the serum uric acid in the past 2 weeks before enrollment, presenting abnormally high levels of transaminase (> 2.0 times of the upper normal limit) or serum creatinine (> 1.0 time of the upper normal limit), and suffering from urinary calculi, rheumatoid arthritis, or other serious associated conditions. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, and informed consents were obtained from all patients. This study was registered with ChiCTR, No. ChiCTR1800019352.

Study design

This was a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled, open-label study (Fig. 1). The patients were randomized 1:1 according to random number table into the febuxostat group (Feb group), in which patients were treated with febuxostat 20 mg/day + sodium bicarbonate 3 g/day, or benzbromarone group (Ben group), with benzbromarone 25 mg/day + sodium bicarbonate 3 g/day. Patients took fixed dose of febuxostat or benzbromarone daily in the morning and took 1 g of sodium bicarbonate three times a day for 12 weeks and were followed at the end of 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study

Full size image

Baseline information was collected before the initiation of treatment, after a washout period of 14 days. In the washout period, patients discontinued the use of ULT drugs. If gout flare occurs, the patients would be treated with colchicine and NSAIDs and the washout period would be restarted.

The following data were obtained at baseline: age, gender, disease history, height, body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum glucose (GLU), serum triglyceride (TG), serum cholesterol (TC), serum creatinine (Cr), and serum uric acid (UA). The biochemistry tests were repeatedly measured at every visit. The creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) were used to assess the renal function (Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation, Ccr = (140-age) × body weight (kg)/0.818 × Scr (μmol/L)). Patients who interrupted to take drugs for more than 3 days and who failed to be followed up were judged as withdrawn cases.

Colchicine and/or etoricoxib were administered at any sign of gout flares during the trial. Every gout flare was recorded at the next follow-up visit. Hepatic protectants diammonium glycyrrhizinate, silibinin, or polyene phosphatidyl choline were prescribed at physicians’ discretion in cases whose serum transaminases exceeded the upper limit of normal by 2-fold.

The primary endpoints of this study included the rates to achieve ULT target (sUA < 360 μmol/L) and the decreasing ranges of sUA at the end of treatment. The secondary endpoint was the number of gout flares during the treatment and the side effects.

Data analysis

The per-protocol analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0 and EmpowerStats software. Data was presented as mean ± SD or proportions. Comparisons of baseline data between the two groups were performed using the t test or Mann-Whitney rank-sum test for measurement data and chi-squared test for categorical data. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors predicting the sUA target-achieving. To access the variation tendency of repeatedly measured data of two groups, data was analyzed with mixed model for repeated data by EmpowerStats software. The computing methods of this mixed model emphasized the comparison of the changing trend of variables between the two groups, which was the changing trend of uric acid and other indexes in this case.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the patients

From November 2015 to September 2017, 240 patients were randomly assigned and given either the Feb group or Ben group, and 214 patients completed 12 weeks’ ULT (105 in the Feb group and 109 in the Ben group). The information on recruitment is shown in Fig. 1. There were two withdraw cases (one in each group) who stopped drugs because of liver function damage (> 3 times of upper normal limit and cannot be reverted by taking routine liver-protective drugs only). The major baseline demographic and gout-associated clinical characteristics (sUA, Ccr) are well-balanced between the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the subjects
Full size table

Logistic regression analysis of characteristics related to target-achieving

According to the results of the t tests and chi-squared tests of the baseline variables between patients who achieved or did not achieve the treating targets, age, body weight, duration of disease, and presence or absence of tophus, baseline sUA and Ccr were brought into logistic regression analysis to explore risk factors that impacted target achieving rates. The baseline levels of sUA (Exp(B) = 2.411, 95% CI 1.452–4.005) and Ccr (Exp(B) = 1.279, 95% CI 1.082–1.513) were regarded as independent risk factors to predict achieving the ULT target in the Feb group. And the sUA was the only factor in the Ben group (Exp(B) = 2.177, 95% CI 1.447–3.277) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Clinical factors associated with RAT. a Clinical risk factors associated with RAT in the Ben group. b Clinical factors associated with RAT in the Feb group. The data was analyzed by logistic regression multivariate analysis. Exp(B) = the exponent of b. The Exp(B) values indicated the risk to fail to achieve treatment target for each unit additional increase on the covariate. The “each unit” was 60 μmol /L in sUA, 10 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 in Ccr, present (1) or absent (0) in tophus, 1 kg in body weight, 1 year in duration of disease and age. **P < 0.01

Full size image

The RAT and major disease-related biochemical parameters after ULT

As the target of ULT was set as the endpoint sUA level < 360 μmol/L, we calculated the number and proportion of people who achieved that target. The overall RAT of all the patients was 37.9% (81/214). 38.1% (40/105) of patients in the Feb group and 37.6% (41/109) in the Ben group reached the goal. There were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Low dose of febuxostat and benzbromarone led to decreased levels of sUA throughout the treatment period which dropped from 561.10 ± 71.63 (μmol/L) to 404.27 ± 81.10 (μmol/L) in the Feb group and from 554.90 ± 66.73 (μmol/L) to 390.91 ± 92.87 (μmol/L) in the Ben group, respectively. Average uric acid levels significantly decreased in both the Feb Group and Ben Group (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Major clinical parameters during the trial
Full size table

The average levels of liver or renal function-related parameters were within normal range throughout the trial except the ALT level in the Feb group slightly exceeded the upper limit of normal range. Ccr, TG, ALT, and AST of the Feb group increased during the ULT compared to the baseline levels (Table 2). Twenty-five-milligram benzbromarone treatment did not alter the major liver, lipid metabolic, and renal function-related parameters (Table 2).

Subgroup analysis based on baseline sUA and renal function

Given baseline sUA and renal function associated with RAT outcome suggested in multivariate analysis, we performed a subgroup analysis of RAT based on baseline sUA level (< or ≥ 540 μmol/L) and renal function (Ccr ≤ or > 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2). Gout patients in the Feb group and Ben group with baseline sUA < 540 μmol/L achieved higher RATs (Feb 58.7% and Ben 57.1%) after 12-week treatment than the overall patients (Feb 38.1% and Ben 37.6%). On the other hand, patients with baseline sUA ≥ 540 μmol/L reached lower RATs (Feb 22.4% and Ben 21.7%) than the overall patients (Fig. 3). When considering baseline renal functions, gout patients with Ccr > 110 mL min− 1 1.73 m− 2 exhibited lower RATs for the Feb group (21.7%) compared to the RATs of overall patients (38.1%) (Fig. 3). The difference was not significant for the Ben group (31.4% vs. 43.1%). However, RATs of gout patients with Ccr > 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 (Feb 21.7%, Ben 31.4%) are much lower than the RATs of patients with Ccr ≤ 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 (Feb 50.8%, Ben 43.1%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Subgroup analysis of RAT based on the baseline sUA level and renal function. The RAT in the Feb group, the Ben group, and subgroups after ULT for 12 weeks. The detail date was in the text. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. RAT of the alternative subgroup within the Feb or Ben group; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 vs. overall RAT of the Feb or Ben group

Full size image

Then, we further stratified patients into 4 subgroups in the Feb or Ben group by combining baseline sUA level and renal function. We were able to demonstrate that RATs of gout patients with baseline sUA < 540 μmol/L and Ccr ≤ 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 increased to over 60% (71% for the Feb group and 67.9% for the Ben group). The RATs for the Feb group (16.1%) or Ben group (23.3%) were both low in the subgroups with baseline sUA ≥ 540 μmol/L and Ccr > 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2. Otherwise, RATs of the other two subgroups are not superior to the overall RATs despite one baseline levels of sUA or Ccr factor exists (Fig. 3).

Safety evaluation

During the 12 weeks of the study, the Ben group showed similar occurrence rate of gout flares with the Feb group (33.94% vs 22.85%, P > 0.05) (Table 3). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence rate of more than one flare (10.09% vs 6.66%, P > 0.05). The overall occurrence of gout flair was 28.50% (Table 3).

Table 3 Adverse events
Full size table

The treatment-related AEs were similar between the Feb group and the Ben group; most of them were mild to moderate extent (Table 3). The patients with elevated transaminase to over 40 U/L were 35/105 in the Feb group and 26/109 in the Ben group; most of them were mild (elevated to 40–80 U/L) to moderate (elevated to 80–120 U/L) in intensity. Among those patients, 10 in the Feb group and 4 in the Ben group were of clinical significance and in need to take hepatic protectants (transaminase > 2 upper limit of normal (ULN)). One in each group was suggested to withdraw from the study because they needed to stop ULT. All the hepatic events were resolved after hepatic treatment or stopping ULT.

The CKD stages were used to evaluate the safety of low-dose urate-lowering drugs (Table 3). During the 12-week treatment, four patients in the Ben group and none in the Feb group developed CKD, all in the stage I, and the differences of the safety indexes were not statistically significant between the two groups.

The skin reactions (drug eruption, exfoliation, dermatitis medicamentosa) were not found in the patients. None of the major adverse cardiac events (recurrent angina pectoris, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, malignant arrhythmia, death from cardiovascular causes) nor any other adverse event was found.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first head-to-head study comparing the efficacy and safety of low-dose urate-lowering agents, febuxostat and benzbromarone, in primary gout patients. Febuxostat is an XO inhibitor and metabolized in the liver and excreted mainly by the urinary system and intestinal tract. Benzbromarone is a uricosuric agent which inhibits urate transporter 1 (URAT1) that is located to the brush border membrane of renal proximal tubular cells to reduce the reabsorption of uric acid [22, 23]. In Europe and the USA, febuxostat is widely recommended as second-line ULT drug, and benzbromarone is not available in the USA and not available in most Europe countries due to a rare occurring hepatoxicity [24, 25]. However, both febuxostat and benzbromarone are recommended by most Chinese or Japan clinical guidelines as first-line ULT drugs [13,14,15]. Given start low go slow ULT strategy is widely accepted in gout management, the current study provided novel clinical evidence to support the notion that low-dose ULT may bring satisfactory clinical outcome to certain gout patients with baseline sUA and renal function at certain ranges.

In this randomized controlled study, low-dose febuxostat (20 mg/d) reduced sUA by approximately 157 μmol/L, and the overall sUA < 360 μmol/L target-achieving rate was 38.1%. This result is strongly consistent with the previous study conducted by Naoyuki, in which febuxostat was also used with 20 mg/day in a Japanese gout cohort [26]. The result is also similar to other studies, of which the RATs varied from 22.5 to 52.4% in Chinese, Japanese, or western gout cohorts using febuxostat 40 mg/day [27,28,29]. It was poorly reported for the urate-lowering efficacy of benzbromarone. Our study shows low-dose benzbromarone (25 mg/day) reduced sUA by averagely 164 μmol/L, and the RAT was 37.6%, an outcome comparable to that of 20 mg/day febuxostat. The result of stratification analysis based on the baseline sUA level and Ccr is exciting and of great value in dose selection. Our data indicates that both drugs work effectively in a low dose for most Chinese gout patients with sUA level < 540 μmol/L. As for most patients with sUA level ≥ 540 μmol/L, a dose escalation may be needed to catch the sUA targets. Most patients (67.9% in the Ben group and 71% in the Feb group) with both sUA < 540 μmol/L and Ccr ≤ 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 can achieve the treating goal with a low dose of ULT drugs, and the percentage of patients did not markedly change from the 4th week to the 12th week.

The incidence of gout flare was 22.85% in the febuxostat group. A recent study conducted on Japanese population found the incidence was higher (36.0% vs 20.8%, P = 0.048) in patients treated with febuxostat 40 mg/day than 10 mg/day initiation for 12 weeks [18]. Another study also found that the incidence of gout flare was higher in the febuxostat 40 mg group than in the 20 mg group (17.6% vs 5.7%, P < 0.05) [26]. These results indicate that the recurrence rate of gout flare tends to be initial-dose-dependent.

Gout is often accompanied by nephropathy and metabolism-related diseases such as diabetes and dyslipidemia. The ideal urate-lowering agent is supposed to improve the comorbidities or at least not to aggravate them. Theoretically, febuxostat is more suitable for patients with urate overproduction, and benzbromarone is for patients with urate underexcretion. Situations are usually more complicated in actual practice when comorbidities or combined medicines exist. In safety evaluation, neither of the two groups manifested severe drug-related side effects, and the average blood glucose did not change markedly in neither group. Febuxostat’s hepatoxicity is generally tolerable according the previous studies [30,31,32]. We did observe transaminase levels in the Feb group increased mildly comparing with baseline and the Ben group. However, there was no statistical difference in the proportion of patients with elevated transaminase between the two groups, and transaminase elevation in the Feb group was generally mild to moderate and self-limited (23.81% increased by 1–2ULN, 8.57% increased by 2–3ULN). The TG level elevated in the Feb group, which was also consistent with the previous study. It is better choosing febuxostat with a second thought for those with hypertriglyceridemia. In contrast, the average levels of transaminase and TG did not change in the Ben group. Benzbromarone has been reported to be related to several cases of hepatic failure and was withdrawn from the market in some European countries in 2003 [24, 25], which was not observed in our study using low-dose benzbromarone.

The Ccr level increased (approximately 5 mL/min) after 12 weeks’ treatment in the Feb group but not in the Ben group, while the sUA decreased comparably between the two groups. These results imply that febuxostat but not benzbromarone may provide extra renal protection irrespectively of urate lowering. One recent randomized trial also found that febuxostat delays the progression of renal dysfunction in Japanese patients [33].

Kidney function is associated with hyperuricemia, and it will make a difference in the urate-lowering treatment response. The sUA target-achieving rate was higher in patients with Ccr ≤ 110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 than in patients with Ccr>110 mL min−1 1.73 m− 2 (in the Feb group, 50.8% vs 21.7%, P < 0.01; in the Ben group, 43.1%vs 31.4%, P < 0.01), especially in the febuxostat group. The impact of Ccr on the target-achieving rate may have resulted from its role on urate excretion. The kidney is the main organ of urate excretion, and the urate excretion fraction is determined by filtration in the glomerular and reabsorption and secretion in the tubular. In early stage of gouty nephropathy, nocturia and hyposthenuria are observed, accompanied by increased urinary urate excretion, indicating impaired renal tubular function and reduced water and uric acid reabsorption [34, 35].Thus, reduced uric acid reabsorption at early stage of gouty nephropathy may favor urate lowering effect of ULT drugs. Given the distinct ULT mechanisms of febuxostat and benzbromarone, febuxostat likely benefits more from change of uric acid resorption since benzbromarone also targets uric acid reabsorption and a competitive effect may exist.

The limitations of the study include its open-label design and relatively short experimental period (12 weeks). A dose-escalation design with longer period would provide more information to guide using these two ULT drugs in real-world clinical practice. However, RCT design and participating patients with reasonably large size warrant the robustness of the results and derived conclusions. In addition, the study population was with relatively normal renal function, so the conclusion may not apply in gout patients with impaired renal function.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both febuxostat 20 mg/day and benzbromarone 25 mg/day can significantly reduce sUA levels with minimal adverse effects, and a substantial percentage of gout patients can achieve RAT, particularly for patients with baseline sUA < 540 μmol/L and Ccr≦110 mL min−1 1.73 m−2. The results strengthened the concept of start low go slow in ULT and provided evidence to guide febuxostat and benzbromarone use to achieve optimal clinical outcome among gout patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

Ccr:

Creatinine clearance rate

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

Cr:

Creatinine

FEUA:

Fraction excretion of uric acid

GLU:

Serum glucose

RAT:

Rate of achieving target sUA

sUA:

Serum uric acid

TC:

Cholesterol

TG:

Triglyceride

ULT:

Urate-lowering therapy

References

  1. Kuo CF, Grainge MJ, Zhang W, Doherty M. Global epidemiology of gout: prevalence, incidence and risk factors. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(11):649–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Busso N, So A. Mechanisms of inflammation in gout. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(2):206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Qin T, Chen J, et al. Hyperuricemia and risk of incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lima WG, Martins-Santos ME, Chaves VE. Uric acid as a modulator of glucose and lipid metabolism. Biochimie. 2015;116:17–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Y, Fang L, Jiang L, et al. Uric acid induces renal inflammation via activating tubular NF-kappaB signaling pathway. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Billiet L, Doaty S, Katz JD, Velasquez MT. Review of hyperuricemia as new marker for metabolic syndrome. ISRN Rheumatol. 2014;2014:852954.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarson LE, Hider SL, Belcher J, Heneghan C, Roddy E, Mallen CD. Increased risk of vascular disease associated with gout: a retrospective, matched cohort study in the UK clinical practice research datalink. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(4):642–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(1):29–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamanaka H, Metabolism TG. Essence of the revised guideline for the management of hyperuricemia and gout. Japan Med Assoc J. 2012;55(4):324–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sivera F, Andres M, Carmona L, et al. Multinational evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of gout: integrating systematic literature review and expert opinion of a broad panel of rheumatologists in the 3e initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(2):328–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qaseem A, Harris RP, Forciea MA. Management of acute and recurrent gout: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(1):58–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jordan KM, Cameron JS, Snaith M, et al. British Society for Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Rheumatology. 2007;46(8):1372–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diseases M-DETFoHaIR. Chinese multi-disciplinary consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of hyperuricemia and its related diseases. Zhonghua nei ke za zhi. 2017;56(3):235–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yamanaka H. Japanese guideline for the management of hyperuricemia and gout: second edition. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2011;30(12):1018–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu KH, Chen DY, Chen JH, et al. Management of gout and hyperuricemia: multidisciplinary consensus in Taiwan. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(4):772–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamburger M, Baraf HS, Adamson TC 3rd, et al. 2011 recommendations for the diagnosis and management of gout and hyperuricemia. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39(4):98–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu X, Li C. Fresh perspectives on the CARES trial and the use of febuxostat in an Asian population: comment on the article by Choi et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(3):479–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamanaka H, Tamaki S, Ide Y, et al. Stepwise dose increase of febuxostat is comparable with colchicine prophylaxis for the prevention of gout flares during the initial phase of urate-lowering therapy: results from FORTUNE-1, a prospective, multicentre randomised study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(2):270–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamatani N, Fujimori S, Hada T, et al. Multicenter, open-label study of long-term administration of febuxostat (TMX-67) in Japanese patients with hyperuricemia including gout. J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;17(4 Suppl 2):S50–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu H, Liu X, Song Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of benzbromarone and febuxostat in hyperuricemia patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective pilot study. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22(6):1324–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Neogi T, Jansen T, Dalbeth N, et al. 2015 gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1789–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Enomoto A, Kimura H, Chairoungdua A, et al. Molecular identification of a renal urate anion exchanger that regulates blood urate levels. Nature. 2002;417(6887):447–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vitart V, Rudan I, Hayward C, et al. SLC2A9 is a newly identified urate transporter influencing serum urate concentration, urate excretion and gout. Nat Genet. 2008;40(4):437–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arai M, Yokosuka O, Fujiwara K, et al. Fulminant hepatic failure associated with benzbromarone treatment: a case report. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17(5):625–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haring B, Kudlich T, Rauthe S, Melcher R, Geier A. Benzbromarone: a double-edged sword that cuts the liver? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25(1):119–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamatani N, Fujimori S, Hada T, et al. Placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the non-purine-selective xanthine oxidase inhibitor Febuxostat (TMX-67) in patients with hyperuricemia including those with gout in Japan: phase 3 clinical study. J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;17(4 Suppl 2):S19–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou Q, Su J, Zhou T, Tian J, Chen X, Zhu J. A study comparing the safety and efficacy of febuxostat, allopurinol, and benzbromarone in Chinese gout patients: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;55(2):163–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamamoto T, Hidaka Y, Inaba M, et al. Effects of febuxostat on serum urate level in Japanese hyperuricemia patients. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(5):779–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Becker MA, MacDonald PA, Hunt BJ, Jackson RL. Diabetes and gout: efficacy and safety of febuxostat and allopurinol. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(11):1049–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Becker MA, Schumacher HR Jr, Wortmann RL, et al. Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2450–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang X, Du H, Gu J, et al. An allopurinol-controlled, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel between-group, comparative study of febuxostat in Chinese patients with gout and hyperuricemia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2014;17(6):679–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kamatani N, Fujimori S, Hada T, et al. An allopurinol-controlled, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel between-group, comparative study of febuxostat (TMX-67), a non-purine-selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, in patients with hyperuricemia including those with gout in Japan: phase 2 exploratory clinical study. J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;17(4 Suppl 2):S44–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kojima S, Matsui K, Hiramitsu S, et al. Febuxostat for cerebral and CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(22):1778–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu J, Hou X, Yuan X, et al. Knockout of the urate oxidase gene provides a stable mouse model of hyperuricemia associated with metabolic disorders. Kidney Int. 2018;93(1):69–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fathallah-Shaykh SA, Cramer MT. Uric acid and the kidney. Pediatric Nephrol. 2014;29(6):999–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the research project grants from National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant 2016YFC0903400), National Science Foundation of China (grants 81520108007, 81770869, 31471195 and 81602258), Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program (grant 2018CXGC1207), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province (grant ZR2018ZC1053), and the Basic Application Research Plan of Qingdao (grant 15-9-1-98-jch).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Nan Liang, Mingshu Sun and Ruixia Sun contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Nan Liang, Ruixia Sun, Lidan Ma, Xiaoyu Cheng, Xiaomei Xue & Changgui Li

  2. Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Nan Liang & Xiaomei Xue

  3. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases and Qingdao Key Laboratory of Gout, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Nan Liang, Lingling Cui, Can Wang, Xiaomei Xue, Yuwei He, Aichang Ji & Changgui Li

  4. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Mingshu Sun

  5. Department of Geratology, the 971th Hospital of PLA, Qingdao, China

    Ting Xu

  6. Institute of Metabolic Diseases, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Wenyan Sun, Xuan Yuan, Hui Zhang, Hailong Li, Yuwei He, Aichang Ji, Xinjiang Wu & Changgui Li

Authors
  1. Nan Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingshu Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruixia Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ting Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lingling Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Can Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lidan Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiaoyu Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaomei Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wenyan Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xuan Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hailong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yuwei He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Aichang Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Xinjiang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Changgui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NL was a major contributor in writing the manuscript; NL, RS, LM, XC, and XX have contributed in the arrangement of follow-up visit; LC and CW have worked on the sample processing; WS, XY, HZ, HL, YH, and AJ have contributed in the interpretation of data; CL and RS were the designers of the study; XW, MS, TX, and LC contributed in revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xinjiang Wu or Changgui Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, and informed consents were obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, N., Sun, M., Sun, R. et al. Baseline urate level and renal function predict outcomes of urate-lowering therapy using low doses of febuxostat and benzbromarone: a prospective, randomized controlled study in a Chinese primary gout cohort. Arthritis Res Ther 21, 200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1976-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1976-x

Keywords

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us