Skip to main content
Download PDF

Detecting gastrointestinal manifestations in patients with systemic sclerosis using anti-gAChR antibodies

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 22, Article number: 32 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) complicated by gastrointestinal dysmotility are difficult to treat and have high mortality. To clarify the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal manifestations, we aimed to demonstrate the association among the clinical features of SSc, the serological markers, the autoantibodies against nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at autonomic ganglia (gAChR).

Methods

Fifty patients were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of gastrointestinal manifestations, and the characteristics were analyzed between these two groups. We measured biomarkers and the autoantibodies against two gAChRα3 and β4 subunits to test sera samples. Furthermore, patients were classified based on the presence or absence of anti-gAChR autoantibodies, and their clinical features were compared.

Results

In patients with SSc and gastrointestinal manifestations, digital ulcers were more frequent (p = 0.050) and VEGF expression was significantly higher (p = 0.038). Seven subjects with SSc were seropositive for α3 subunit, whereas one patient was seropositive for β4 subunit. The mean level of anti-gAChRα3 autoantibodies in SSc patients with gastrointestinal manifestations was significantly higher than that in SSc patients without gastrointestinal manifestations (p = 0.001). The group of patients with SSc and gAChR autoantibodies had significantly higher endostatin levels (p = 0.046).

Conclusions

This study is the first to demonstrate that clinical characteristics of SSc patients with seropositivity for gAChR autoantibodies. Patients with SSc have circulating autoantibodies against gAChR, which may contribute to gastrointestinal manifestations associated with this disease, suggesting that gAChR-mediated autonomic neurotransmission may provide a pathomechanism for gastrointestinal dysmotility in SSc.

Background

Autoimmune gastrointestinal dysmotility (AGID) is recognized as a limited form of autoimmune dysautonomia [1, 2]. Gastrointestinal dysmotility in the patients with autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG) is often prominent and may be profound, in some cases [3, 4]. Autoantibodies (Abs) targeting the ganglionic neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (gAChR) in autonomic ganglia can potentially cause widespread autonomic dysfunction, leading to AAG [5, 6]. Several studies have been performed to evaluate the frequency and specificity of serum Abs against neuronal, glial, and muscle antigens in patients clinically diagnosed with AGID, including those with achalasia, gastroparesis, pyloric stenosis, colonic inertia, and intestinal pseudo-obstruction [1, 2, 7,8,9,10]. AGID has been clinically associated with cancer and autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and the sera of patients with gut-motility disorders were screened in a few studies for antibodies specific to voltage-gated potassium channels, voltage-gated calcium channels of the P/Q- and N-type, glutamic acid decarboxylase, and neuronal gAChRα3 [7,8,9,10]. Recently, we reported that patients with AAG presenting anti-gAChR Abs had severe motility disorders [3, 4, 11], and demonstrated the existence of the gAChR Abs-related AGID in Japan [12].

Systemic sclerosis (SSc), a multi-systemic disorder of the connective tissues, is characterized by widespread vascular damage and fibrosis of the skin and visceral organs [13, 14] Gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations occur frequently in patients with SSc [15,16,17]. Pseudo-obstruction, malabsorption, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea are some of the GI complications that can occur in SSc [18,19,20,21,22]. In addition, autonomic dysfunction is also common in SSc, starting early during the disease process and sometimes precedes the development of fibrosis [23,24,25,26,27]. The pathogenesis of GI involvement is thought to include early vascular damage to the vasa nervorum [28]. This leads to neurological dysfunctions, particularly those involving autonomic pathways.

Humoral immunity dysregulation has been recognized to play an important role in SSc pathogenesis, and numerous Abs can be detected in the sera of patients with SSc [29]. Three Abs are specific for SSc and serve as specific markers. The anti-centromere antibody (ACA) is the most common marker of limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc). Anti-scleroderma-70 (anti-Scl-70) is detected mostly in diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), although 25 to 30% of patients positive for anti-Scl-70 may have lcSSc disease. Anti-RNA polymerase III is also an important biomarker associated with severe dcSSc and a 25% risk of renal crisis [29]. Earlier studies demonstrated that GI dysmotility in SSc was associated with circulating Abs against the muscarinic AChRs and myenteric neurons [19, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Recently, McMahan and colleagues reported patients with SSc and anti-RNPC3 antibodies had moderate-to-severe GI disease and interstitial lung disease [36].

Recently, we presented the roles of serum biomarkers and endothelial function measurement by Endo-PAT in predicting organ involvement in patients with SSc [37], and we established a luciferase-reporter immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay for detecting the gAChR Abs in a recent study from our laboratory. Using this method, we then aimed to confirm with two step analysis the relationship between the clinical features of SSc, especially GI manifestations, the serum biomarkers, and the anti-gAChR Abs.

Patients and methods

Ethical approval

All subjects provided written, informed consent to participate in this study. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committees of Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center (approval number 2011-21) and the Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (approval number 11032820).

Patients and study design

This study was cross-sectional. Sixty-three Japanese patients with SSc, who fulfilled the 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis [38], were consecutively recruited for this study from May 2011 to March 2015. The patients visited Nagasaki University Hospital and Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center. Thirteen patients were excluded due to insufficient data. Finally, 50 patients with SSc (mean age, 62.2 ± 9.7 years; 6 males and 44 females) were analyzed. Serum and plasma were obtained from all subjects and stored. Patients were grouped according to the classification system proposed by LeRoy et al. [39]: 34 patients had lcSSc and 16 patients had dcSSc. Six patients had been treated with low-dose corticosteroids (prednisolone, < 10 mg daily). Four patients had received immunosuppressants including methotrexate, cyclosporin, and tacrolimus. No patients had received vasodilators, such as endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Ten patients treated with calcium channel blockers against hypertension and nine patients were treated with antiagrregants. All patients underwent a full medical history and physical examination. We reviewed each patient for the presence or absence of comorbid disease, Raynaud’s phenomenon, digital ulcers, GERD, renal crisis, interstitial pneumonitis, and pulmonary hypertension [34]. Laboratory assessments included blood tests, pulmonary function tests, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity testing, chest X-ray and/or high-resolution computed tomography, and transthoracic echocardiography [37].

Clinical assessment of autonomic function and biomarker measurements

Comprehensive clinical and neurological assessments were performed for all patients [11, 40]. We reviewed clinical survey data and summaries for the patients whether they had any of the following symptoms, which would indicate dysfunction of the autonomic system: orthostatic hypotension (OH) or orthostatic intolerance (OI), arrhythmia, pupillary dysfunction, coughing episodes, dryness of the skin, hypohidrosis or anhidrosis associated with heat intolerance, appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, early satiety, postprandial abdominal pain, and gastroparesis associated with dysfunction of the upper gastrointestinal system, diarrhea or constipation, and paralytic ileus associated with dysfunction of the lower gastrointestinal system, dysuria or urinary retention associated with bladder dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction. Evidence of GI manifestation was determined by physician documentation in the clinical records and/or the presence of at least one symptom of upper and lower digestive systems described above. Gastric and enteric involvement were assessed by performing bedside patient examinations, reviewing the patients’ records, and interviewing the patients’ families. GERD was ascertained by performing a barium esophagography using the multiphasic cine technique, and esophagitis was assessed by a gastrofiberscope.

Measurements of serum biomarkers, including GDF-15 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), PlGF (R&D Systems), endostatin (R&D Systems), and VEGF (R&D Systems), and the plasma levels of PTX3 (Perseus Proteomics, Tokyo, Japan) were performed as described previously [37].

In the first step of the present study, patients with SSc were classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of GI manifestations and compared the clinical features and biomarkers described above.

LIPS assay for Abs against gAChR

In the second step of the present study, serum gAChR Abs from the patients with SSc were detected by performing the LIPS assay. Subsequently, patients with SSc were classified into the two categories depending of the presence or absence of the gAChR Abs. We compared these two groups and attempted to identify the clinical characteristic of the SSc patients who were seropositive for the gAChR Abs.

We previously established and reported the use of LIPS to diagnose AAG based on IgGs against both the α3 and β4 gAChR subunits in patient serum samples [11]. We measured the gAChR Abs at the Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center, as previously described [11]. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the LIPS assay, we verified the cut-off points for all data collected in the previous study [41]. Based on the anti-gAChRα3 and β4 Abs data from the healthy control subjects, the cut-off values were calculated as the mean plus three standard deviations (SDs) from the mean [42]. In this study, antibody levels were expressed as an antibody index (AI) that was calculated as follows: AI = (measured relative luminescence units [RLU] value for the serum sample)/(the RLU cut-off value). The normal value established in this study from healthy individuals was an AI of < 1.0.

Statistical analysis

SigmaPlot® was used for data analysis. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the prevalence of symptoms and associated data between patients with SSc and GI manifestations and those without GI manifestations. The normally distributed data in both groups of patients with SSc were analyzed by a t test for the continuous variables (age, age at onset, disease duration, all laboratory data, and the levels of Abs and biomarkers). The Mann–Whitney U test was employed in cases where the frequencies of Abs and other patient data were not normally distributed. For the categorical variables, Fisher’s exact test was used. For all analyses, p < 0.05 was considered to reflect a statistically significant difference.

Results

Detection of gAChR Abs in patients with SSc

Fourteen percent (7 of 50) of the sera samples from patients with SSc were positive for anti-gAChR Abs. More specifically, anti-gAChRα3 antibodies were detected in 7 samples, whereas anti-gAChRβ4 antibodies were detected in 1 sample (2%, 1 of 50). Further, 1 of the serum samples in the group of patients with SSc and GI manifestations was positive for both antibodies.

Clinical features of patients with SSc with or without GI manifestations

Only one patient described below demonstrated systemic dysautonomia such as OH/OI, pupillary dysfunction, and GI manifestations. Except for this patient, no patients exhibited systemic dysautonomia. However, GI manifestations were observed in 19 patients with SSc (38%) and were composed of various digestive-system problems, such as GERD (14/19, 74%), constipation (10/19, 53%), appetite loss (9/19, 47%), vomiting (4/21, 21%), early satiety (3/19, 16%), ileus (2/19, 11%), and diarrhea (1/19, 5%). Tables 1 and 2 summarize the clinical profiles, SSc Abs, laboratory data, serum biomarkers, and gAChR Abs for patients with SSc, either with or without GI manifestations. No significant differences in the clinical profile, SSc Abs, and laboratory data were noted. Various autonomic dysfunction was confirmed in one seropositive case only (patient 1 in Table 2).

Table 1 Comparison of the clinical features of SSc patients, with and without GI manifestations
Full size table
Table 2 Summary of the characteristics of 19 patients with SSc and GI manifestations
Full size table

The respective mean levels of anti-gAChRα3 Abs in patients with GI manifestations (+) and GI manifestations (−) were 0.771 AI and 0.452 AI (p = 0.001; Table 3), and the respective mean levels of anti-gAChRβ4 Abs in patients with GI manifestations (+) and GI manifestations (−) were 0.424 AI and 0.316 AI (p = 0.318; Table 3). The frequencies of gAChR Abs in the groups of SSc patients with GI manifestations (+) or without GI manifestations (−) were 21% (4 of 19), and 10% (3 of 28), respectively (p = 0.273; Fig. 1 and Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of laboratory findings between SSc patients with and without GI manifestations
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic representation of study design. Details regarding study design and recruitment for patients in each group. We tested sera from patients with SSc. Using the LIPS assay, we detected autoantibodies against gAChR in 21% (4 of 19) of samples from patients with SSc and GI manifestations, and in 10% (3 of 31) of samples from patients with patients without GI manifestations

Full size image

Analysis of serum biomarkers revealed that VEGF production was significantly higher in the group of patients with SSc and GI manifestations than in the group with SSc that lacked GI manifestations (p = 0.038; Table 3). No correlations were found between the presence of gAChR Abs and clinical profiles, SSc Abs, laboratory data, and serum biomarkers during statistical analysis with all of the samples.

Clinical features of patients with SSc and gAChR Abs

The detailed clinical features of patients with SSc, with or without anti-gAChR Abs, are shown in Table 4. In 7 patients with SSc and gAChR Abs, 3 patients (42.9%) had GERD, 2 patients (28.6%) had constipation, 1 patient (14.3%) had paralytic ileus, and 1 patient (14.3%) had diarrhea (Table 4), with some overlap in symptoms occurring between patients. In contrast, the frequencies of each GI manifestation were low in patients with SSc who did not have gAChR Abs, as compared to patients with SSc and gAChR Abs. A tendency was observed where the clinical symptoms of patients with SSc, such as digital ulcers, renal crisis, interstitial pneumonitis, and pulmonary hypertension, were more frequent in patients with SSc that also had gAChR Abs (Table 4). Moreover, while analyzing serum biomarkers in this study, we found that endostatin levels were significantly higher in patients with SSc and gAChR Abs than in SSc patients without gAChR Abs (p = 0.046; Table 4).

Table 4 Clinical profiles of patients with SSc in the presence or absence of gAChR Abs
Full size table

Discussion

This study is the first to our knowledge to describe the clinical characteristics and biomarkers of the SSc patients who were positive for gAChR Abs. In this study, autonomic function and humoral autoimmunity against the autonomic nervous system were investigated in patients affected by SSc, with a particular focus on GI dysmotility in those patients. Here, we report four major findings: (i) we determined the frequencies of Abs against gAChR in SSc patients with GI manifestations, (ii) the mean levels of anti-gAChRα3 Abs and VEGF were significantly higher in the SSc with GI manifestations group than in the SSc without GI manifestations group, and (iii) endostatin was significantly higher in SSc patients with gAChR Abs than in SSc patients without gAChR Abs.

SSc is a chronic autoimmune disease, and the most common clinical presentations include Raynaud’s phenomenon, skin thickening, and tightness caused by widespread vasculopathy and excessive fibrosis [13]. The GI tract is the commonly involved internal organ in SSc. Vascular changes, collagen accumulation in the submucosa, and smooth muscle atrophy are histological hallmarks of SSc found in the digestive walls of patient biopsies and autopsies [16, 20, 21]. However, recently, the association between Abs and SSc GI damage has attracted great interest. We found that 21% of the SSc patients with GI manifestations were seropositive for anti-gAChR Abs in this study. The gAChR Abs can potentially impair autonomic ganglionic synaptic transmission. Additionally, because both the sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia utilize nicotinic cholinergic synapses, Abs that interfere with ganglionic transmission may cause dysautonomia [6, 43]. Furthermore, the levels of anti-gAChRα3 Abs were significantly higher in SSc patients with GI manifestations. Hence, the gAChR Abs were considered as possible pathogenic humoral factor in the pathomechanism of GI dysmotility in SSc along with Abs against M3R, RNPC3, U1 snRNP, U3 snRNP, signal recognition particle, Ku, and myenteric neuron [29, 30, 44].

Several previous studies were performed to evaluate autonomic functions in patients with SSc and identify associations with the severity of microvascular damage [13, 15]. Gigante and colleagues evaluated correlation between autonomic dysfunctions and VEGF production, and they concluded that parasympathetic dysfunction was linked to digital microvascular damage based on data related to heart rate variability and VEGF release [45]. Neuropilin 1 is a non-tyrosine kinase receptor for VEGF that plays an essential role in GI motility [46]. In the future, it will be important to verify the role of VEGF and its receptor in autonomic function, especially GI contractility and motility. In this manner, the role of VEGF in the autonomic dysfunctions in SSc could become clear.

In SSc patients with gAChR Abs, clinical profiles involving digital ulcers, renal crisis, interstitial pneumonitis, and pulmonary hypertension were more frequent, although no statistical significances were observed. Previously, some research groups investigated potential biomarkers of SSc, including endostatin, to correlate their levels with serological and clinical parameters [47]. These previous reports supported the conclusion that higher serum levels of endostatin correlated with angiogenesis and fibrosis disturbances and, thus, may play an important role in SSc. Our present data also showed a high serum concentration of endostatin in SSc patients with gAChR Abs but no clear association of endostatin with the levels of gAChR Abs. The larger sample numbers with prospective observations are necessary to reveal the role of endostatin in the pathomechanism of SSc. The relationship between the role of endostatin and gAChR Abs associated with the autonomic dysfunction has yet to be verified. However, serum endostatin levels could be related to clinical profiles described above for SSc patients with gAChR Abs [37].

Based on the facts of the present study, the clinical profiles of the group of SSc patients with GI manifestations and the group of SSc patients with the gAChR Abs did not overlap completely (Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4). Only one patient was seronegative in the group of the SSc with gAChR Abs in Table 4. Accordingly, we considered the possibility that the gAChR Abs were produced from the mechanism of SSc autoimmunity. The detailed pathogenesis of such a condition has not been fully elucidated, although GI dysmotility disorders are likely to exist within the broad clinical spectrum of AAG that is etiologically characterized by anti-gAChR Abs. For many years, SSc has been considered a manifestation of an underlying motility disorder. In 1972, Cohen et al. proposed that immune-mediated enteric dysfunction occurred in SSc [48]. This raises the possibility that motility changes may result from dysfunctions of neurons involved in the enteric nervous system, the vasculature, or elsewhere [19,20,21]. It is also possible that SSc GI damage occurring in such a case is a variation of AGID, considering that the anti-gAChR Abs might mediate autonomic dysfunction, contributing to the autoimmune mechanisms underlying these GI motility disorders [1, 2, 12, 17]. Several reports have shown the occurrence of anti-M3R Abs correlating with GI dysmotility in SSc [32,33,34], as well as the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) due to anti-idiotypic neutralization [34]. As with the gAChR, the M3R exists in human autonomic nervous system. Although GI dysmotility in SSc with the anti-gAChR Abs could be considered a form of AGID in a broad sense, we recommend future experimentation be performed to test the hypothesis that immune cell–endothelial nerve interactions (even with anti-gAChR Abs) are related autonomic dysfunction, including GI manifestations, in SSc. Our results suggest rheumatologists and neurologists should be aware of the necessity of measuring the levels of anti-gAChR Abs in SSc cases with autonomic dysfunction including GI manifestations.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we determined the clinical characteristics of SSc patients with seropositivity for the anti-gAChR Abs, and considered the relationship among gAChR Abs, several biomarkers, and GI manifestations in SSc. However, the present study has important limitations that should be noted, namely, the observational study design and the small sample size. A prospective, clinical interventional, multicenter cohort study will be necessary to confirm the relationships between the levels of anti-gAChR Abs, serum biomarkers (including VEGF and endostatin), and autonomic function (including the severity of GI dysmotility in SSc) versus the outcomes of immunotherapies. Moreover, it is necessary to clarify whether a direct link exists between the presence of gAChR Abs and the specific interference in synaptic transmission in autonomic ganglia including GI tract.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Shunya Nakane had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Abbreviations

AAG:

Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy

Abs:

Antibodies

ACA:

Anti-centromere antibody

AGID:

Autoimmune gastrointestinal dysmotility

AI:

Antibody index

CVRR:

Coefficient of variation in R-R intervals

dcSSc:

Diffuse cutaneous SSc

gAChR:

Ganglionic acetylcholine receptor

GERD:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

GI:

Gastrointestinal

IVMP:

Intravenous methylprednisolone

lcSSc:

Limited cutaneous SSc

LIPS:

Luciferase immunoprecipitation system

NE:

Norepinephrine

OH:

Orthostatic hypotension

OI:

Orthostatic intolerance

RLU:

Relative luminescence units

SD:

Standard deviation

SSc:

Systemic sclerosis

References

  1. 1.

    Dhamija R, Tan KM, Pittock SJ, et al. Serologic profiles aiding the diagnosis of autoimmune gastrointestinal dysmotility. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:988–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Flanagan EP, Saito YA, Lennon VA, et al. Immunotherapy trial as diagnostic test in evaluating patients with presumed autoimmune gastrointestinal dysmotility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26:1285–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Morimoto N, Takahashi S, Inaba T, et al. A case of seropositive autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy with diffuse esophageal spasm. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;39:90–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yoshida T, Kinjo M, Nakane S. Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy associated with Sjögren's syndrome presenting with recurrent abdominal distension. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Autoimmune+autonomic+ganglionopathy+associated+with+Sjögren%27s+syndrome+presenting+with+recurrent+abdominal+distension.

  5. 5.

    Vernino S, Low PA, Fealey RD, et al. Autoantibodies to ganglionic acetylcholine receptors in autoimmune autonomic neuropathies. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:847–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang Z, Low PA, Vernino S. Antibody-mediated impairment and homeostatic plasticity of autonomic ganglionic synaptic transmission. Exp Neurol. 2010;222:114–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Verne GN, Sallustio JE, Eaker EY. Anti-myenteric neuronal antibodies in patients with achalasia. A prospective study. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:307–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kraichely RE, Farrugia G, Pittock SJ, et al. Neural autoantibody profile of primary achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:307–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Törnblom H, Lang B, Clover L, et al. Autoantibodies in patients with gut motility disorders and enteric neuropathy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:1289–93.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hubball AW, Lang B, Souza MA, et al. Voltage-gated potassium channel (K(v) 1) autoantibodies in patients with chagasic gut dysmotility and distribution of K(v) 1 channels in human enteric neuromusculature (autoantibodies in GI dysmotility). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:719–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nakane S, Higuchi O, Koga M, et al. Clinical features of autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy and the detection of subunit-specific autoantibodies to the ganglionic acetylcholine receptor in Japanese patients. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0118312.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mukaino A, Minami H, Isomoto H, et al. Anti-ganglionic AChR antibodies in Japanese patients with motility disorders. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:1227–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Denton CP, Khanna D. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet. 2017;390:1685–99.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Richard N, Hudson M, Wang M, et al. Severe gastrointestinal disease in very early systemic sclerosis is associated with early mortality. Rheumatology. 2019;58:636–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    McMahan ZH, Hummers LK. Gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018;30:533–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McFarlane IM, Bhamra MS, Kreps A, et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology Published Online First: 30 March 2018. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1149.1000235.

  17. 17.

    Emmanuel A. Current management of the gastrointestinal complications of systemic sclerosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:461–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lukie BE, Sanders MG. Chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction with malabsorption, a scleroderma-like disorder. Can Med Assoc J. 1973;109:1222–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kumar S, Singh J, Rattan S, et al. Review article: pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:883–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shreiner AB, Murray C, Denton C, et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2016;1:247–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gyger G, Baron M. Gastrointestinal manifestations of scleroderma: recent progress in evaluation, pathogenesis, and management. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2012;14:22–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Thoua NM, Derrett-Smith EC, Khan K, et al. Gut fibrosis with altered colonic contractility in a mouse model of scleroderma. Rheumatology. 2012;51:1989–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sonnex C, Paice E, White AG. Autonomic neuropathy in systemic sclerosis: a case report and evaluation of six patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986;45:957–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bertinotti L, Bracci S, Nacci F, et al. The autonomic nervous system in systemic sclerosis. A review. Clin Rheumatol 2004;23:1–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Di Franco M, Paradiso M, Riccieri V, et al. Autonomic dysfunction and microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:1278–83.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bienias P, Ciurzyński M, Glińska-Wielochowska M, et al. Heart rate turbulence assessment in systemic sclerosis: the role for the detection of cardiac autonomic nervous system dysfunction. Rheumatology. 2010;49:355–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gigante A, Rosato E, Liberatori M, et al. Autonomic dysfunction in patients with systemic sclerosis: correlation with intrarenal arterial stiffness. Int J Cardiol. 2014;177:578080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Braun-Moscovici Y, Brun R, Braun M. Systemic sclerosis and the gastrointestinal tract-clinical approach. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2016;7(4). https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10258.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Berger M, Steen VD. Role of anti-receptor autoantibodies in pathophysiology of scleroderma. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16:1029–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Howe CS, Eaker EY, Sallustio JE, et al. Antimyenteric neuronal antibodies in scleroderma. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:761–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Eaker EY, Kuldau JG, Verne GN, et al. Myenteric neuronal antibodies in scleroderma: passive transfer evokes alterations in intestinal myoelectric activity in a rat model. J Lab Clin Med. 1999;133:551–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Goldblatt F, Gordon TP, Waterman SA. Antibody-mediated gastrointestinal dysmotility in scleroderma. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1144–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kawaguchi Y, Nakamura Y, Matsumoto I, et al. Muscarinic-3 acetylcholine receptor autoantibody in patients with systemic sclerosis: contribution to severe gastrointestinal tract dysmotility. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:710–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Singh J, Mehendiratta V, Del Galdo F, et al. Immunoglobulins from scleroderma patients inhibit the muscarinic receptor activation in internal anal sphincter smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;297:G1206–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kumar S, Singh J, Kedika R, et al. Role of muscarinic-3 receptor antibody in systemic sclerosis: correlation with disease duration and effects of IVIG. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;310:G1052–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    McMahan ZH, Domsic RT, Zhu L, et al. Anti-RNPC3 (U11/U12) antibodies in systemic sclerosis are associated with moderate to severe gastrointestinal dysmotility. Arthritis Care Res Published Online First: 22 September 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23763

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kawashiri Y, Nishino A, Igawa T, et al. Prediction of organ involvement in systemic sclerosis by serum biomarkers and peripheral endothelial function. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36(Suppl 113):102–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/ European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:2737–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nakane S, Mukaino A, Maeda Y, et al. Extra-autonomic manifestations in autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy: a Japanese survey. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88:367–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Maeda Y, Nakane S, Higuchi O, et al. Ganglionic acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune diseases including primary biliary cirrhosis. Mod Rheumatol. 2017;27:664–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nakane S, Mukaino A, Higuchi O, et al. Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2018;18:953–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Vernino S, Lindstrom J, Hopkins S, et al. Characterisation of ganglionic acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies. J Neuroimmunol. 2008;197:63–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Nishigami E, Tochimoto A, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Characteristics of patients with early systemic sclerosis and severe gastrointestinal tract involvement. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:2050–5.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gigante A, Margiotta D, Navarini L, et al. Parasympathetic activity increases with digital microvascular damage and vascular endothelial growth factor in systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36(Suppl 113):24–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yamaji M, Mahmoud M, Evans IM, et al. Neuropilin 1 is essential for gastrointestinal smooth muscle contractility and motility in aged mice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0115563.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mostmans Y, Cutolo M, Giddelo C, et al. The role of endothelial cells in the vasculopathy of systemic sclerosis: a systematic review. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16:774–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cohen S, Fisher R, Lipshutz W, et al. The pathogenesis of esophageal dysfunction in scleroderma and Raynaud's disease. J Clin Invest. 1972;51:2663–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 16 K09695 and 19H03549).

Funding

This study was supported by AMED under grant number 19dk0310099, and JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 16 K09695 and 19H03549.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroimmunology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

    Shunya Nakane & Yasuhiro Maeda

  2. Department of Clinical Research, Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan

    Shunya Nakane, Osamu Higuchi & Yasuhiro Maeda

  3. Department of Neurology, Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan

    Shunya Nakane, Yasuhiro Maeda & Hidenori Matsuo

  4. Department of Molecular Neurology and Therapeutics, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1, Honjo, Chuouku, Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan

    Shunya Nakane & Akihiro Mukaino

  5. Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Unit of Translational Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

    Masataka Umeda, Shin-ya Kawashiri, Kunihiro Ichinose, Hideki Nakamura & Atsushi Kawakami

  6. Department of Neurology and Strokology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan

    Akihiro Mukaino

Authors
  1. Shunya Nakane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masataka Umeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shin-ya Kawashiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akihiro Mukaino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kunihiro Ichinose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Osamu Higuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yasuhiro Maeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hideki Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hidenori Matsuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Atsushi Kawakami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SN had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. SN, MU, SK, HM, and AK conceived of and designed the study. SN, MU, SK, AM, KI, OH, YM, and HN acquired the data. SN, MU, SK, AM, YA, HM, and HK analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors were involved in drafting the article or making critical revisions for important intellectual content, and all authors read and approved the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shunya Nakane.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects provided written, informed consent to participate in this study. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committees of Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center (approval number 2011-21) and the Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (approval number 11032820).

Consent for publication

N/A

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakane, S., Umeda, M., Kawashiri, S. et al. Detecting gastrointestinal manifestations in patients with systemic sclerosis using anti-gAChR antibodies. Arthritis Res Ther 22, 32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-2128-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Systemic sclerosis
  • Autoantibody
  • Ganglionic acetylcholine receptor
  • Gastrointestinal manifestations

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us