Skip to main content

Cluster analysis of phenotypes of patients with Behçet’s syndrome: a large cohort study from a referral center in China



Behcet’s syndrome (BS) is a complex, heterogeneous disorder. However, classification of its subgroups is still debated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features and aggregation of patients with BS in China, based on manifestations and organ involvements.


This was a cross-sectional study of BS patients in Huadong Hospital of Fudan University between September 2012 and January 2020. We calculated relative risks (RRs) of clinical variables according to sex. Moreover, we conducted a hierarchical cluster analysis applied according to eighteen variables to determine subgroups of patients.


A total of 860 BS patients were included. Male sex was associated with ocular involvement (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.67, 3.22, P < 0.0001), vascular involvement (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.23, 3.23, P = 0.004), cardiac lesion (RR 5.46, 95% CI 2.33, 12.77, P < 0.0001), and central nervous system involvement (RR 2.95, 95% CI 1.07, 6.78, P = 0.007) and was negatively associated with genital ulcers (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79, 0.91, P < 0.0001). Five clusters (C1–C5) were observed. C1 (n = 307) showed the skin and mucosa type. In C2 (n = 124), all had articular involvement, barely having major organ involvement except for 18 cases with intestinal lesions. In C3 (n = 156), the gastrointestinal type, 144 patients presented with intestinal involvement, and 36 patients with esophageal ulcers. In C4 (n = 142), all subjects presented with uveitis. C5 (n = 131) consisted of 44 patients with cardiac lesions, 58 with vascular involvement, and 26 cases having central nervous system involvement.


Our analysis confirmed sex differences in phenotypes of BS. Cluster analysis identified gastrointestinal, uveitis, and cardiovascular involvement cluster separately in different subsets, which represents the most commonly involved organs. Further research is required to replicate and clarify the patterns of phenotype in BS.

Significance and innovations

  • Our study confirmed sex-related phenotypes, especially the association between male sex and cardiac, arterial disease.

  • Five subgroups were identified by cluster analysis, with gastrointestinal, uveitis, and cardiovascular and CNS clusters representing commonly involved organs.

Behçet’s syndrome (BS) is a rare disorder that causes various blood vessel inflammations with a unique geographic distribution and obscure etiology [1]. In the 1930s, it was successively described by Benedict Adamantiades and Hulusi Behçet as a triad of aphthous oral ulcers, genital lesions, and hypopyon [2]. In honor of the contribution of both scientists, it is also named as Adamantiades-Behçet’s disease (ABD). Thereafter, major organ involvements in patients with BS have been reported, such as neurological [3], cardiovascular [4, 5], and intestinal manifestations [6]. The “atypical” manifestations of BS represent the heterogeneous characteristics of the disorder [7]. Although BS affects nearly every organ, usually few organs are involved in the same patient [8]. A recent meta-analysis using pooled BS cases of 2061–13,995 estimated [9] that the frequencies of 16 common disease-related manifestations were below 50%, except for skin-mucosa lesions, which indicates a variety of combinations of major organ involvements among individual patients. The symptoms and major organ involvement of BS tend to vary among sex, age [9,10,11], and ethnic groups [12,13,14]. Epidemiological studies on BS are always important because the diagnosis of BS is clinical, and changes in clinical characteristics and severity may be observed during the course of the disorder [14]. Accurate definition of phenotypic clusters is of crucial importance for proper management. There are some phenotype studies mainly using factor analysis [15], correspondence analysis [16], or logistic regression analysis [17] to explore patterns of organ associations from different countries. Recently, Seyahi [18] reviewed and proposed six phenotypes: skin-mucosa involvement, joint involvement, vascular involvement, eye involvement, parenchymal neurological involvement, and gastrointestinal involvement.

China is an endemic area of BS. Nevertheless, epidemiological researches in China are inadequate and limited by either enrolling a small number of subjects [19,20,21] or focusing on one specific subgroup of BS [22,23,24]. We could not get a panoramic view of clinical phenotypes of BS in China from the limited data previously published. There is great interest in better characterizing the heterogeneity in this complex disease [25]. Disease phenotypes defining clinical subgroups could offer us a chance to decipher the pathogenesis and hence provide precision medicine [26].

Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to identify sex-associated differences in manifestations and major organ involvements. In order to minimize subjective bias, we employ an unsupervised clustering analysis to define certain clinical subsets with homogeneous phenotype and clinical manifestations.

Patients and methods

Cohort overview

A cross-sectional study of BS patients was conducted in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology in Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, from September 2012 to January 2020. The revision of International Study Group criteria (ISG) [27], Japan revised [28], Cheng and Zhang criteria (China) [29], and International Criteria for BS (ICBD) [30] were selected for inclusion. We included patients who satisfied at least one of the four selected classification criteria. The final diagnosis was verified by at least 2 rheumatologists. Detailed clinical and laboratory data were recorded, including demographic data, laboratory assessments, imaging studies, and pathological findings. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Huadong Hospital and all patients gave consent to participate in the study.

Previously, we found BS patients could concurrently associate with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) [31]. Accordingly, exclusion criteria included malignancies (except for MDS), infectious diseases, or other inflammatory rheumatic disorders.

Assessment of clinical manifestation, major organ involvement, and severity

Organ involvement was assessed by reviewing the patient’s symptoms, past medical history, physical examination, laboratory studies, imaging examinations, and endoscopy findings. Ophthalmologic data recorded the type of uveitis (namely, anterior, posterior, or panuveitis), laterality, ocular findings, and ocular complications [32]. Diagnosis of intestinal BS was confirmed with extraintestinal systemic manifestations, and the characteristic endoscopic, histopathologic, and radiological features, which helped to distinguish intestinal BD from Crohn’s disease [33]. The classification of major vascular involvements in BS was adopted [34]. Vascular involvement was defined as deep venous thrombosis, major vein (vena cava, hepatic) thrombosis, and arterial thrombosis or aneurysms, which were detected by Doppler ultrasonography and (or) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (or) computerized tomography (CT) [35]. Cardiac lesions were documented as valvular regurgitation, intracardiac thrombi [36], and coronary artery disease [24], which were documented by echocardiography or coronary angiography and (or) CT. Atherosclerosis or other causes of cardiac lesions were carefully excluded. MDS was diagnosed and classified according to WHO classification [37], while patients had typical BS manifestations. Central nervous system (CNS) included inflammatory parenchymal lesions, and extra-parenchymal forms causing cerebral venous sinus thrombosis [38].

Disease severity was assessed by Krause’s score [13].

Statistical analysis

The software program SPSS (v. 20, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses. Values are expressed as means ± SD or medians with 25–75% ranges, whichever was appropriate depending on whether the data were normally distributed. Student’s test or the Mann-WhitneyU test was used to compare numerical variables between groups. The chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

The TwoStep Cluster Analysis began with the selection of variables, which were classified as continuous or categorical. Continuous variables were age, age at onset, duration of disease, and Krause score. Categorical variables were sex, clinical manifestation (recurrent oral ulcers, genital ulcers, erythema nodosum, papulopustular lesions, joint involvement), and major organ involvement (uveitis, gastrointestinal involvement, cardiovascular involvement, parenchymal involvement, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), cerebral arterial involvement, and MDS). In total, 18 variables were included for cluster analysis apart from the classification criteria; the rest of the variables are shown in Table 1. The log-likelihood method was used to determine inter-subject distance and specific classification of participants.

Table 1 Relative risks by gender for clinical variables among patients with Behçet’s syndrome


Demographics, manifestations, and major organ involvements

We enrolled 860 patients with BS. Among them, 424, 838, 759, and 427 cases satisfied Japan revised, Cheng and Zhang criteria (China), ICBD criteria, and ISG criteria, respectively.

The median age of patients was 36 years (interquartile range, IQR 28–47 years). The median age at onset was 27 years (IQR 20–36 years) and the median disease duration was 7 years (IQR 3–10 years). The median Krause score was 4 (IQR 3–5). The sex ratio in our cohort was M:F = 1.16:1. Oral aphthous ulcers were the most common manifestation; the prevalence of oral ulcers was 99.5%. The frequencies of other mucocutaneous and joint manifestations were genital ulcers 77.1%, erythema nodosum 40.0%, papulopustular lesions 24.2%, and arthritis or arthralgia 21.0%. Intestinal involvements were the most common major organ involvements in our cohort with a prevalence of 20.7%, followed by uveitis with 18.0%; vascular involvement 8.5%, including 29 cases with deep venous thrombosis, 7 with major vein (vena cava, hepatic) thrombosis, and 46 with arterial involvement; cardiac lesion 5.1% (valvular heart complications in 38 cases, ventricular intracardiac thrombus in 2, coronary involvement in 3, and myocarditis in 1 case); esophageal ulcer 4.2%; CNS involvement 3.6% (19 patients with parenchymal lesions, two having cerebral arterial involvement, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in four cases, four with parenchymal lesions and brain aneurysm, and two having meningitis); and MDS 0.7%. The detailed demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Sex-phenotype analysis

In regard to sex-associated clinical features (Table 1), male sex was correlated with ocular involvement [RR (male: female) 2.32 (95% CI 1.67, 3.22)], including panuveitis [2.72 (1.88, 3.92)]; vascular involvement [2.00 (1.23, 3.23)], including deep venous thrombosis [2.71 (1.17, 6.27)] and arterial thrombosis or aneurysms [1.97 (1.07, 3.64)]; cardiac lesions [5.46 (2.33, 12.77)]; and central nervous system involvement [2.73 (1.10, 6.76)]. Male patients were more likely to have parenchymal lesions (16/462) as compared with female (7/398), but without statistical significance (P = 0.141). In addition, male sex was associated with skin manifestation [1.15 (1.02, 1.30)] and papulopustular lesions [1.70 (1.32, 2.19)]. Female sex was associated with genital ulcers [RR (male to female) 0.84 (0.79, 0.91)].

Noticeably, no sex difference was found in anterior uveitis, intestinal lesions (including intestinal erosion, ulcer and perforation), and esophageal ulcers.

We previously observed that the incidence of ocular involvement was lower among our gastrointestinal Behçet’s syndrome (GIBS) patients than among those with BS without GI lesions (0% vs 28%) [39]. Thus, we analyzed the association between ocular disease and intestinal involvement. We found that intestinal involvement was negatively associated with uveitis [0.26, (0.14, 0.49), P < 0.0001].

Cluster analysis

Five clusters were generated with distinct features. The characteristics of each cluster are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Characteristics of patients with Behçet’s syndrome after clustering on clinical manifestations

The first cluster (C1, n = 307, 35.7%)—skin and mucosa type, late-onset, female dominance

This was the largest group; it consisted of subjects with a median age at onset of 28 years (IQR 20–38 years), female predominant cluster sex ratio (male to female) = 0.64:1. All patients had genital ulcers. The prevalence of erythema nodosum was 40.7% and that of papulopustular lesions was 20.8%. This group had no major organ involvement, except for MDS in one case. The proportion of subjects meeting Japan revised, Cheng and Zhang, ICBD, and ISG criteria was respectively 52.4%, 100%, 100%, and 52.8%. Disease severity was low, the median Krause score = 3.

C2 (n = 124, 14.4%)—joint involvement type, late-onset, sex ratio (male to female, 0.97:1)

The subjects in C2 had a median age at onset of 28 years (IQR 19–37 years). All had joint involvement (arthritis or arthralgia). Papulopustular lesions presented in 28.2% cases. Major organ involvement was rarely seen, except for 18 cases of intestinal involvement and 2 cases of esophageal lesions gathered in this cluster. Patients met ICBD (79.0%) and Cheng and Zhang criteria (99.2%), while 41.9% satisfied Japan revised criteria and 45.2% ISG criteria. The median Krause Score was 4.

C3 (n = 156, 18.1%)—GIBS type, late-onset, sex ratio (male to female, 1.08:1)

The majority had intestinal lesions (92.3%), including intestinal erosion (5 cases), ulcers (117 cases) and perforation (22 cases), and had a median age at onset of 28 years (IQR 19–38 years). Most patients had oral ulcers (98.0%), genital ulceration (61.5%), and papulopustular lesions (25.6%), while the rate of erythematous nodosum (19.2%) was relatively lower than in the other clusters. No patients presented with ocular lesions or cardiovascular involvement. Esophageal ulceration was present in 32 cases of C3. Intestinal involvement was strongly related to esophageal ulcers [RR 6.02, (3.15, 11.53), P < 0.0001]. Three subjects had MDS in C3. Patients of BS associated with MDS had a higher risk of intestinal lesion than those without [RR 4.16, (2.31, 7.47), P = 0.008].

The proportion of subjects meeting the four classification criteria (JPN, CHN, ICBD, ISG) was 22.4%, 94.2%, 62.8%, and 23.1% respectively. The median Krause score was 4.

C4 (n = 142, 16.5%)—uveitis type, young male (male to female ratio, 2.94:1)

All subjects had ocular lesions, including anterior uveitis (16 cases) and panuveitis (126 cases), and the median age at onset was 25 years (IQR 20–32 years). Oral aphthous ulcers were seen in 99.2%, genital ulcers in 58.5%, and the frequency of skin manifestations was similar to that in C2. Inversely, patients in this group rarely had intestinal involvement (5.6%), no vascular or cardiac lesions. 83.8%, 99.3%, 99.3%, and 81.7% subjects satisfied JPN, CHN, ICBD, and ISG criteria, respectively. The median Krause score was 6.

C5 (n = 131, 15.2%)—cardiovascular type, male (male to female ratio, 2.54:1)

In C5 the median age at onset was 27 years (IQR 21–35 years), and 44.3% had vascular involvements. There were 29 cases with deep vein thrombosis and 7 cases with major vein (vena cava, hepatic) thrombosis and 46 cases with arterial thrombosis or aneurysms. Cardiac lesions were observed in 44 patients (40 having heart valvular disease, 2 having ventricular thrombi, 1 with coronary disease and the other with myocarditis). The majority of patients with CNS involvement were grouped in C5, including 15 cases with cerebral parenchymal lesions, 1 case with aseptic meningitis, 4 with CVST, 2 with arterial involvement, 3 cases with cerebral aneurysm and parenchymal lesions, and 1 with meningoencephalitic manifestations. Additionally, 13 cases had uveitis in C5. Vascular involvement was positively related to cardiac lesions [RR 2.40, (1.16, 4.96), P = 0.027] and CNS involvement [RR 4.41, (1.00, 9.22), P = 0.001]. Erythematous nodosum (58.6%) was more frequent in this cluster than in the others. 43.5%, 91.6%, 87.8%, and 43.5% subjects satisfied JPN, CHN, ICBD, and ISG criteria, respectively. The median Krause score was 6. Clinical characteristics of the five clusters of patients are summarized in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Five phenotype clusters of patients with Behçet’s syndrome


We conducted detailed and comprehensive analyses in a large cohort of BS patients in China, from which we identified distinct clinical manifestations and major organ involvement patterns between male and female. As expected, major results in the present study were generally in line with those from previous reports [9, 10, 40]. We observed that male patients are characterized by papulopustular lesion-type skin lesions, ocular disease, cardiovascular disease, and central nervous system involvement, while females are characterized by high prevalence of genital ulcers.

The most striking sex effect we found was the links between male sex and cardiac, arterial diseases. As cardiac involvement and major vessel disease are the main cause of mortality in BS [41, 42], our study further supports the notion of the greater frequency of cardiac lesions and major vessel disease in men than in women. Cardiac lesions are rare manifestations of BS. The previous studies of sex-related phenotype either included too few cases to achieve statistical significance [9] or did not include cardiac and arterial disease for subgroup analysis [10]. On the contrary, we found that men were 2–5 times (more risk) as likely to have arterial disease and cardiac lesions as women.

Given the high diversity of clinical manifestations in BS, we applied cluster analysis to explore its phenotype patterns, which helped us to identify five distinct subgroups: C1, skin and mucosa type; C2, articular type; C3, GIBS type, the majority with intestinal involvements, and an aggregation of esophageal ulcers; C4, uveitis type, predominantly male with a younger age of onset; and C5, cardiovascular type and central nervous involvements. Each subset contains patients with only a small number of predominant clinical manifestations reflecting overall a low number of organs involved in our cohort.

Since BS is not a single disease, but a heterogeneous and multi-systemic complex syndrome, studies with well categorized BS subsets are essential [18]. A variety of combinations of clinical manifestations could link to different underlying pathologic pathways [43]. C1 contained most patients having only skin-mucosa lesions, which are the most common manifestations and could cause significant influence on quality of life [44], while in the other clusters, joint lesions and major organ involvements are responsible for serious morbidity and mortality [41] and mandate a variety of intensive treatment strategies.

To the best of our knowledge, no study has been published using cluster analysis of phenotype subsets in unrelated patients with BS. A recent study used cluster analysis to compare symptom patterns between familial and non-familial cases of BS [45]. It yielded a papulopustular lesions and arthritis cluster, which is similar to the results from a factor analysis study conducted by the same group [46]. This clinical feature is consistent with our findings in C2; subjects with articular involvement were associated with a higher prevalence of papulopustular lesions.

C3 consisted of the majority of the subjects having gastrointestinal involvements. Esophageal ulceration is an uncommon manifestation of BS [47]. Thirty-six cases with esophageal ulcers were observed and most of them were aggregated in C3. The other features of C3 were a low prevalence of ocular involvement and erythema nodosum, and no case of vascular involvement. The inverse association of intestinal involvements with ocular lesions was reported previously [8]. The absence of major manifestations (ocular involvement) and lower frequency of minor manifestations (erythema nodosum) resulted in an increment of possible BS cases in C3. Therefore, endoscopical findings are the most critical measurement for accurate diagnosis of intestinal BS [39]. Thus, all intestinal cases in our cohort were confirmed by distinctive endoscopic findings.

Intestinal ulceration is a clinical feature in BS associated with bone marrow failure (BMF), classified as conditions such as MDS or aplastic anemia, and associated with trisomy 8 [48, 49]. In line with those reports, the analysis of our cohort indicated a 4-fold greater risk of intestinal involvement for patients with MDS than without. Therefore, it is recommended for patients with MDS to undergo pretreatment colonoscopy evaluation.

A previous factor analysis study identified uveitis as a distinct factor, and it was negatively associated with erythema nodosum only among females [50]. In our cohort, we confirmed that uveitis was an entity by itself, prevailing in young male patients, rarely coexisting with intestinal involvements.

Of note, we identified cases with cardiovascular lesions grouped together in C5. Previous studies revealed a positive association between cardiac and vascular lesions [9, 51]. Cardiac involvements include myocarditis, aortic or mitral valve disease, intra-cavitary thrombi, and coronary damage. In our cohort, aortic or mitral valve disease was the most frequently involved damage to the heart.

By factor analysis, Krause et al. [52] identified a positive relation between deep vein thrombosis and neurologic involvement in BS. Similarly, we found patients with neurological involvement including parenchymal involvement and CVST were gathered in C5. The prevalence of neurological disorders is rare across race and ethnicity; the frequency of CVST is extremely low [53]. In a previous cohort, there were found 7/11 (64%) patients with CVST positively associated with extracranial large vessel events, compared with 15/77 (19%) patients with parenchymal disease (p = 0.004). Of note, in that cohort, there were only 11 cases with CVST, which could result in statistical bias. Due to ethnic differences and diverse statistical methods, we found the majority of neurological disorders were parenchymal lesions aggregated with cardiovascular lesions in C5. Besides, our results revealed that uveitis could cluster with vascular involvement [18].

Our findings could help us to identify clinical characteristics and understand the similarity of pathogenic mechanisms within each specific cluster, which could contribute to better ways of managing BS. With the current cluster pattern, we could presume a female with skin lesions would generally have a mild disease course, while a young male with panuveitis would be unlikely to have intestinal involvement. Cardiovascular and CNS involvements are clustered together, which suggests possible similar underlying pathogenesis in each manifestation. However, when applying this cluster pattern, we should consider phenotypic differences among racial and ethnic groups. As compared with cohorts from Middle East countries [54, 55], our cohort had a higher frequency of GI involvement and lower frequency of vascular and ocular lesions.

There are some strengths and limitations in this study. The major strength of our study was a well-defined large sample size and the strictly defined inclusion criteria which allowed a well-categorized the investigation of BS. Besides, we applied 18 variables to cluster analysis representing the disease’s heterogeneity. Additionally, we distinctly included data on intestinal and cardiac lesions, and diagnosis of MDS confirmed by objective laboratory findings. Nevertheless, a single-center study could lead to selection bias. It should be noted, in our cohort, that the prevalence of arterial lesion was higher than that of deep venous thrombosis. We cannot exclude a slight ascertainment bias for the prevalence of joint involvement. Finally, the cross-sectional design of our study and not including medication as a clustered variable did not allow us to investigate the dynamics of the phenotype. Therefore, a future, longitudinal study design is warranted for the stability of the cluster pattern.


In conclusion, our data provided new insights into phenotype patterns in a large cohort of unrelated BS patients by a combination of sex-associated comparison and cluster analysis. Our preliminary findings of the subgroup pattern requires further replication to identify the similarity in other cohorts and even from other ethnicities. Whether the clustering solution can be translated into enhanced understanding of pathogenesis differences and guide therapy requires further clarification.



Adamantiades-Behçet’s disease


Bone marrow failure


Behçet’s syndrome


The Chinese version of Behçet’s disease criteria created by Cheng and Zhang


Central neurological involvement


Computed tomography


Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis


Gastrointestinal Behçet’s syndrome


International Criteria for BS


Interquartile range


International Study Group criteria


Diagnostic criteria of the Behçet’s disease research committee of Japan (1987 revision)


Myelodysplastic syndrome


Magnetic resonance imaging


Relative risk


  1. 1.

    Yazici H, Seyahi E, Hatemi G, Yazici Y. Behcet syndrome: a contemporary view. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018;14(2):107–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tirilomis T. Some more historical notes on Adamantiades-Behçet’s disease. Chest. 2001;120(6):2116.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Whitty CW. Neurologic implications of Behcet’s syndrome. Neurology. 1958;8(5):369–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shen LL, Cui GG, Liang RL. Valve prolapse in Behçet's disease. Br Heart J. 1985;54(1):100–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Boolukos PJ. Phlebitis and thrombosis of the larger veins of the body as a symptom of Behcet’s disease. Helv Med Acta. 1960;27:264–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sekine T, Shiratori T. Case of Behcet’s syndrome with recurrent ileal ulcer successfully treated by secondary surgery. Geka Chiryo Surg Ther. 1971;25(5):590–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bettiol A, Hatemi G, Vannozzi L, Barilaro A, Prisco D, Emmi G. Treating the different phenotypes of Behçet’s syndrome. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2830.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Suzuki T, Horita N, Takeuchi M, Ishido T, Mizuki Y, Mizuki R, Kawagoe T, Shibuya E, Yuta K, Yamane T, et al. Clinical features of early-stage possible Behçet’s disease patients with a variant-type major organ involvement in Japan. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29(4):640–6.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bonitsis NG, Luong Nguyen LB, LaValley MP, Papoutsis N, Altenburg A, Kötter I, Micheli C, Maldini C, Mahr A, Zouboulis CC. Gender-specific differences in Adamantiades-Behçet’s disease manifestations: an analysis of the German registry and meta-analysis of data from the literature. Rheumatology. 2015;54(1):121–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ishido T, Horita N, Takeuchi M, Kawagoe T, Shibuya E, Yamane T, Hayashi T, Meguro A, Ishido M, Minegishi K, et al. Clinical manifestations of Behçet’s disease depending on sex and age: results from Japanese nationwide registration. Rheumatology. 2017;56(11):1918–27.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ryu HJ, Seo MR, Choi HJ, Baek HJ. Clinical phenotypes of Korean patients with Behcet disease according to gender, age at onset, and HLA-B51. Korean J Intern Med. 2018;33(5):1025–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Davatchi F, Shahram F, Chams-Davatchi C, Shams H, Nadji A, Akhlaghi M, Faezi T, Ghodsi Z, Faridar A, Ashofteh F, et al. Behcet’s disease: from east to west. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29(8):823–33.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Krause I, Mader R, Sulkes J, Paul M, Uziel Y, Adawi M, Weinberger A. Behcet’s disease in Israel: the influence of ethnic origin on disease expression and severity. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(5):1033–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Davatchi F, Chams-Davatchi C, Shams H, Shahram F, Nadji A, Akhlaghi M, Faezi T, Ghodsi Z, Sadeghi Abdollahi B, Ashofteh F, et al. Behcet’s disease: epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13(1):57–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Karaca M, Hatemi G, Sut N, Yazici H. The papulopustular lesion/arthritis cluster of Behçet’s syndrome also clusters in families. Rheumatology. 2012;51(6):1053–60.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tascilar K, Melikoglu M, Ugurlu S, Sut N, Caglar E, Yazici H. Vascular involvement in Behçet’s syndrome: a retrospective analysis of associations and the time course. Rheumatology. 2014;53(11):2018–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Suwa A, Horita N, Ishido T, Takeuchi M, Kawagoe T, Shibuya E, Yamane T, Hayashi T, Meguro A, Ishido M, et al. The ocular involvement did not accompany with the genital ulcer or the gastrointestinal symptoms at the early stage of Behçet’s disease. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29(2):357–62.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Seyahi E. Phenotypes in Behçet’s syndrome. Intern Emerg Med. 2019;14(5):677–89.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang L-Y, Zhao D-B, Gu J, Dai S-M. Clinical characteristics of Behçet’s disease in China. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30(9):1191–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhang Z, He F, Shi Y. Behcet’s disease seen in China: analysis of 334 cases. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(3):645–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Geng L, Ohno S, Wang YH, Higuchi M. Clinical observations on Behçet’s disease in Tianjin, China. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1985;29(3):310–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yang P, Fang W, Meng Q, Ren Y, Xing L, Kijlstra A. Clinical features of chinese patients with Behçet’s disease. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2):312–318.e314.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li S. Analysis of 27 cases of large vascular lesions in 161 cases of Behcet’s disease: clinical manifestations and treatment outcome. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(5):671–5.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chen H, Zhang Y, Li C, Wu W, Liu J, Zhang F, Zheng W. Coronary involvement in patients with Behçet’s disease. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(10):2835–41.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gloyn AL, Drucker DJ. Precision medicine in the management of type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(11):891–900.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Agache I, Akdis CA. Precision medicine and phenotypes, endotypes, genotypes, regiotypes, and theratypes of allergic diseases. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(4):1493–503.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Criteria for diagnosis of Behçet's disease. International Study Group for Behçet's Disease [J]. Lancet 1990;335(8697):1078–80.

  28. 28.

    Mizushima Y. Recent research into Behcet’s disease in Japan. Int J Tissue React. 1988;10(2):59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen SP. Some special clinical manifestations of Behcet’s disease---report of illustrative cases and review of literature (author’s transl). Zhonghua nei ke za zhi. 1980;19(1):15–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for Behcet's D.: The International Criteria for Behcet's Disease (ICBD): a collaborative study of 27 countries on the sensitivity and specificity of the new criteria [J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(3):338–47.

  31. 31.

    Shen Y, Ma HF, Luo D, Cai JF, Zou J, Guan JL. High incidence of gastrointestinal ulceration and cytogenetic aberration of trisomy 8 as typical features of Behçet’s disease associated with myelodysplastic syndrome: a series of 16 consecutive Chinese patients from the Shanghai Behçet’s disease database and comparison with the literature. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8535091.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tugal-Tutkun I, Onal S, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Huseyin Altunbas H, Urgancioglu M. Uveitis in Behcet disease: an analysis of 880 patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(3):373–80.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cheon JH, Kim WH. An update on the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of intestinal Behcet’s disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27(1):24–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Calamia KT, Schirmer M, Melikoglu M. Major vessel involvement in Behcet disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2005;17(1):1–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Seyahi E. Behçet’s disease: how to diagnose and treat vascular involvement. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016;30(2):279–95.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lee I, Park S, Hwang I, Kim M-J, Nah S-S, Yoo B, Song J-K. Cardiac Behçet disease presenting as aortic valvulitis/aortitis or right heart inflammatory mass: a clinicopathologic study of 12 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(3):390–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bennett JM. Changes in the updated 2016: WHO classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes and related myeloid neoplasms. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016;16(11):607–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Uygunoglu U, Siva A. Behcet’s syndrome and nervous system involvement. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018;18(7):35.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zou J, Shen Y, Ji DN, Zheng SB, Guan JL. Endoscopic findings of gastrointestinal involvement in Chinese patients with Behcet’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(45):17171–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Han M, Jung YS, Kim WH, Cheon JH, Park S. Incidence and clinical outcomes of intestinal Behcet’s disease in Korea, 2011-2014: a nationwide population-based study. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52(8):920–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kural-Seyahi E, Fresko I, Seyahi N, Ozyazgan Y, Mat C, Hamuryudan V, Yurdakul S, Yazici H. The long-term mortality and morbidity of Behçet syndrome: a 2-decade outcome survey of 387 patients followed at a dedicated center. Medicine. 2003;82(1):60–76.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zouboulis CC, Kurz K, Bratzke B, Orfanos CE. Adamantiades-Behçet disease: necrotizing systemic vasculitis with a fatal outcome. Hautarzt. 1991;42(7):451–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Yazici H, Seyahi E, Hatemi G, Yazici Y. Behçet syndrome: a contemporary view. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018;14(2):107–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fabiani C, Vitale A, Orlando I, Sota J, Capozzoli M, Franceschini R, Galeazzi M, Tosi GM, Frediani B, Cantarini L. Quality of life impairment in Behcet’s disease and relationship with disease activity: a prospective study. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12(7):947–55.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Karaca M, Hatemi G, Sut N, Yazici H. The papulopustular lesion/arthritis cluster of Behcet’s syndrome also clusters in families. Rheumatology. 2012;51(6):1053–60.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Tunc R, Keyman E, Melikoglu M, Fresko I, Yazici H. Target organ associations in Turkish patients with Behçet’s disease: a cross sectional study by exploratory factor analysis. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(11):2393–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mori S, Yoshihira A, Kawamura H, Takeuchi A, Hashimoto T, Inaba G. Esophageal involvement in Behcet’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1983;78(9):548–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ahn JK, Cha HS, Koh EM, Kim SH, Kim YG, Lee CK, Yoo B. Behcet’s disease associated with bone marrow failure in Korean patients: clinical characteristics and the association of intestinal ulceration and trisomy 8. Rheumatology. 2008;47(8):1228–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kimura S, Kuroda J, Akaogi T, Hayashi H, Kobayashi Y, Kondo M. Trisomy 8 involved in myelodysplastic syndromes as a risk factor for intestinal ulcers and thrombosis—Behcet’s syndrome. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001;42(1–2):115–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tunc R, Keyman E, Melikoglu M, Fresko I, Yazici H. Target organ associations in Turkish patients with Behcet’s disease: a cross sectional study by exploratory factor analysis. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(11):2393–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fei Y, Li X, Lin S, Song X, Wu Q, Zhu Y, Gao X, Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zeng X, et al. Major vascular involvement in Behçet’s disease: a retrospective study of 796 patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32(6):845–52.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Krause I, Leibovici L, Guedj D, Molad Y, Uziel Y, Weinberger A. Disease patterns of patients with Behcet’s disease demonstrated by factor analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999;17(3):347–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kidd D, Steuer A, Denman AM, Rudge P. Neurological complications in Behçet’s syndrome. Brain J Neurol. 1999;122(Pt 11):2183–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gheita TA, El-Latif EA, El G II, Samy N, Hammam N, Abdel Noor RA, El-Shebeiny E, El-Najjar AR, Eesa NN, Salem MN, et al. Behçet’s disease in Egypt: a multicenter nationwide study on 1526 adult patients and review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(9):2565–75.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Davatchi F, Shahram F, Chams-Davatchi C, Shams H, Abdolahi BS, Nadji A, Faezi T, Akhlaghi M, Ghodsi Z, Karimi N, et al. Behcet’s disease in Iran: analysis of 7641 cases. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29(6):1023–30.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to acknowledge all participants in the concept mapping workshops for their valuable contribution to this work.


This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871276) and the Clinical Science Innovation Program of Shenkang Hospital Development Center (SHDC12017129).

Author information




J-LG designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. J-F C and Y S carried out the data collection. J Z analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. J-F L carried out the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-long Guan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional review board of Huadong Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, J., Luo, Jf., Shen, Y. et al. Cluster analysis of phenotypes of patients with Behçet’s syndrome: a large cohort study from a referral center in China. Arthritis Res Ther 23, 45 (2021).

Download citation


  • Behçet’s syndrome
  • Phenotype
  • Sex
  • Cluster analysis
  • Clinical manifestation
  • Major organ involvement