Skip to main content
Download PDF

The protein-protein interaction between connective tissue growth factor and annexin A2 is relevant to pannus formation in rheumatoid arthritis

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 23, Article number: 266 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF)-induced angiogenesis is a crucial factor in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but CTGF-interacting protein and related molecular mechanism of their interaction have not been fully elucidated.

Methods

CTGF-interacting proteins were identified through the LC-MS/MS analysis of the Co-IP products from fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS) lysates, and the interaction between CTGF and annexin A2 (ANXA2) was further confirmed through Co-IP and BiFC assay. The binding domain, mutant, mechanism, and angiogenesis function were assessed by homology modeling, molecular docking, MTT, cell scratch, tube formation, and chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays. Additionally, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse co-implantation model was constructed to confirm the effect of ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 in the process of RA in vivo.

Results

ANXA2 was identified and verified as an interaction partner of CTGF for the first time by Co-IP and LC-MS/MS analysis. Co-localization of CTGF and ANXA2 was observed in RA-FLS, and direct interaction of the TSP-1 domain of CTGF and ANXA2 was determined in HEK293T cells. The spatial conformation and stable combination of the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex were assessed by homology modeling in the biomimetic environment. The function of the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex was proved on promoting FLS proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis in vitro and deteriorating FLS invasion and joint damage in SCID mice.

Conclusions

TSP-1 is the essential domain in CTGF/ANXA2 interaction and contributes to FLS migration and pannus formation, inducing the process of RA.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiology, characterized by persistent synovitis and pannus formation [1]. Pannus, an indisputable sign of invasive synovial tissue, enhances synovial vascularity through synovium thickening and angiogenesis [2,3,4,5]. As a key component thereof, the overabundant fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS) secret matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [6,7,8], chemokines [9], and cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-18) thereby modulate growth, inflammation, angiogenesis, and cell recruitment [3]. Furthermore, pannus angiogenesis adversely affects the biomechanical properties of the cartilage, which ultimately leads to cartilage destruction and joint damage [10]. However, the effect of abnormal angiogenesis and FLS migration in the mechanism of pannus formation is still poorly understood.

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), also known as CCN family protein 2 (CCN2), is composed of four domains, including insulin-like growth factor binding protein-like (IGFBP), von Willebrand factor type C repeat (VWC), thrombospondin type 1 repeat (TSP1), and C-terminal cystine-knot (CT) modules [11]. It is a cysteine-rich matricellular protein involved in many biological events, including cell adhesion, proliferation, and angiogenesis. Some evidence revealed the involvement of CTGF in the onset of RA [12, 13]. In our previous proteomic study and the subsequent validation experiments, CTGF was found to be significantly elevated in FLS of 50 RA patients compared with that of 50 healthy controls [14]. Our previous study unveiled the diagnostic value of CTGF in RA, with a high sensitivity and a high specificity, which made it helpful on early diagnosis and distinguishing diagnosis [15]. A study by Nozawa et al. showed that anti-CTGF mAb treatment prevented the progression of arthritis in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice through the suppressive effects on T cell proliferation and Th17 differentiation, indicating that CTGF may become a new target for the treatment of RA [16]. However, the expression of CTGF in the lesion region (synovial tissue) and its function in pannus formation remain unclear. Moreover, we identified the elevated expression of CTGF in RA synovial tissues and validated that overexpressed CTGF could enhance the proliferation and migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by MTT and transwell assays [14]. But the effect of CTGF on FLS proliferation and migration and the molecular mechanism of CTGF-enhanced pannus formation require more investigations in vivo.

Annexin A2 (ANXA2) is a slightly curve-shaped protein consisting of a highly conserved core domain of four homologous repeats capable of binding calcium, phospholipids, heparin, and F-actin and a unique N-terminal interaction domain with the binding sites of S100A10, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and phosphorylation sites [17]. Many studies showed that ANXA2 could promote angiogenesis. The mechanisms for ANXA2 regulation of retinal and corneal angiogenesis have been detailed [18, 19], but there are few studies that focus on the mechanism of ANXA2 on RA pannus angiogenesis. Yi et al. demonstrated that ANXA2 could promote angiogenesis [20], but only focused on the interaction of exogenous AXNA2 and AXNA2R in HUVEC. To this end, endogenous ANXA2 may also play a critical role in the angiogenic response, since it can modulate many biological processes, such as vesicle trafficking and fusion [21]. Besides, the agents interacting with ANXA2 are subject to an ongoing discussion, and the function of their interaction in RA remains unanswered. Therefore, focusing on ANXA2-interacting agents may reveal novel mechanisms that conspire to ANXA2 in pathologic angiogenesis.

In this study, proteins that interacted with CTGF in FLS derived from RA patients were identified. The protein complex from co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) using anti-CTGF mAb was subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. The interaction of ANXA2 and the TSP1 domain of CTGF was identified and further confirmed through Co-IP and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFc) assay. Additionally, the combination of the TSP1 domain and ANXA2 was also verified using homology modeling and molecular docking. The high stability of the complex was successfully assessed by molecular dynamic simulation. We then explored the effect of the interaction of CTGF and ANXA2 in vitro and further verified it using severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse model in vivo, thereby shedding light into the mechanism of pannus formation in the process of RA.

Material and methods

Patients and samples

Synovial tissues were obtained from RA patients who underwent synovectomy or joint replacement surgeries and normal subjects who received high amputations at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from March 2017 to December 2019. RA diagnosis was based on the 2010 ACR criteria. More clinical details of the patients were provided in Supplementary Table S1.

Cell culture and co-immunoprecipitation

Synovial tissue was isolated enzymatically according to a previously described method [22], digested with 5 mg/ml collagenase (Sigma) and 1.5 mg/ml DNase (Sigma), and passed through a wire mesh to prepare isolated cells. FLS derived from synovial tissues were cultured with DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. FLSs were lysed in the RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors on the ice for 30 min followed by being centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant containing the protein complex was incubated with anti-CTGF mAb or anti-ANXA2 mAb and that from HEK293T cells with anti-ANXA2 mAb or anti-FLAG mAb at 4 °C with gentle shaking. After incubating the supernatant with protein A agarose beads at 4 °C for 4 h with gentle shaking, the mixture was placed in a magnetic field for 5 min. The separated beads were then washed with PBS followed by being boiled in 2× SDS loading buffer for 5 min. The protein mixtures in the supernatant were further analyzed by western blotting.

LC-MS/MS analysis

Proteins in gel pieces from Co-IP were analyzed by Nano-LC-MS/MS analysis which was performed on a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled to Easy nLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For more details of the analysis, please refer to the supplementary method. MS/MS spectra were searched using MASCOT engine (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.2) against a nonredundant International Protein Index arabidopsis sequence database v3.85 (released in September 2011; 39,679 sequences) from the European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/).

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay

All constructs for BiFC assays were prepared in pBiFC-VC155 and pBiFC-VN155 (I152L) vector and were co-transfected into HEK293T cell; specifically, CTGF-full length and CTGF-∆TSP1 were ligated into the pBiFC-VC155 vector, and ANXA2-full length was ligated into the pBiFC-VN155 (I152L) vector. The co-transfection of bFosDetaZIPVC155 and pBiFC-bJunVN173 vector was used as a negative control and the co-transfection of pBiFC-bFosVC155, and the pBiFC-bJunVN173 vector was used as a positive control according to a previous study [23]. The primer sequences were listed as Supplementary Table S2. The co-transfected HEK293T cells were cultured in a 6-well plate. After 48 h of cultivation, fluorescent images were obtained using Leica DMIRE2 inverted fluorescence microscope.

Lentiviral transfection, MTT assay, and scratch assay

RA FLS was derived as mentioned above, and knockdown (KD) of CTGF in RA FLS was performed using shRNA. Then, the CTGF-KD FLS were divided into five groups and infected with lentiviruses containing Flag-CTGF-full length, Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1, ANXA2-shRNA+Flag-CTGF-full length, ANXA2-shRNA+Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1, and control. Briefly, GV309 lentivirus vector and poly-brene (50 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) were added in a 6-well plate containing 5 × 104 CTGF-KD FLS cells. After 16 h, the transfection medium was replaced by RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Then, the cells were digested for 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and scratch assay.

In the MTT assay, cells were seeded onto 96-well plates and cultured in the DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS until 90% confluence. FLS were then incubated with MTT for 4 h. After the centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min, DMSO was added into the wells to dissolve the formazan followed by the detection at the absorbance of 490 nm using Bio-Rad iMarkâ„¢ microplate reader.

In the scratch assay, FLS were seeded onto 6-well plates. After 24 h, each well was scratched using a pipette tip in the middle and photographed every 12 h using an inverted microscope.

Tube formation assay

DMEM medium and Matrigel were equally mixed firstly. Twenty-four-well plates were coated with 200 μl Matrigel (BD, Oxford, UK) per well, which were then kept in a 37 °C incubator for 1 h to solidify. HUVECs were first serum-starved for 24 h and then resuspended in DMEM after centrifugation. Next, lentiviruses containing Flag-CTGF-full length, Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1, and ANXA2-shRNA+Flag-CTGF-full length were administered to HUVECs. The HUVECs were then added to the Matrigel-coated wells (1.0 × 104 cells/well in 200 μl of DMEM), and the pictures of each well were observed and photographed after 6 h.

The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay

The 36 fertilized eggs were incubated at 37 °C with a humidity of 40~60%. On the 7th day of incubation, silicone rings were placed on the CAM surface. All the eggs were randomly divided into 3 groups. Next, lentiviruses containing Flag-CTGF-full length, Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1, and ANXA2-shRNA+Flag-CTGF-full length were administered to eggs. The vessels were observed through a stereomicroscope.

FLS-cartilage-SCID model construction

FLS was prepared as mentioned above. The normal human cartilage was cut into 5–8 mm3 pieces, which were obtained from the patients undergoing knee surgery for traumatic injuries. Then, the sterile sponge soaked with 5 × 105 FLS prepared above and a piece of cartilage were inserted under the skin altogether at the left flank of a 4-week-old SCID mouse under sterile conditions. After 60 days, mice were sacrificed, and the implants were removed and embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN) and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately for HE staining. At the same time, the knee joints of all the SCID mice were dissected and maintained in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h followed by the decalcification in the disodium EDTA (pH = 7.2~7.3) for 4~5 weeks (the decalcification solution was changed once a week). The decalcified joint tissues were embedded in paraffin and cut into 5 μm sheets.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of implant and knee joint

After fixation, the implant sections and the mouse knee joint sections were stained using standard hematoxylin, and high-resolution images were captured on a Nikon photomicroscope.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted in GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA), and the data were presented as the mean ± SD. The Shapiro-Wilk method was used to determine whether the data were normally distributed and the homogeneity of variance was tested by the Levene method. The differences between the two groups of data which met the normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were analyzed using the unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-tests. One-way analysis of variance test with post hoc contrasts by Tukey test was applied to compare the means of multigroups.

Results

The expression of CTGF increased in RA patients

The proteins extracted from FLS of synovial tissues in RA patients and healthy controls (HCs) were analyzed by the automated 2D-Nano-LC-ESI-MS/MS, which subsequently identified human CTGF with high amino acid coverage (Fig. 1A). The analysis of the normalized spectrum showed that CTGF was overexpressed in FLS derived from RA patients compared with HCs (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, the mRNA expression of CTGF detected by qPCR was higher in inactive and active RA patients than in healthy controls. However, no significant difference was observed between inactive RA and active RA (Fig. 1C). As expected, compared with HCs, the overexpression of CTGF was further validated by qPCR in RA FLS (Fig. 1D). In addition, the concentration of CTGF was higher in RA serum determined by ELISA compared with HCs (Fig. 1E). The overexpression of CTGF on synovial tissue sections from RA patients was validated by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, most distributed around the blood vessels (Fig. 1F). Considering all the findings above, we claimed that CTGF expression increased in RA patients.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overexpression of CTGF in RA patients. A The different expression of CTGF in FLSs of RA patients (n = 50) and HCs (n = 10) were identified by automated 2D-Nano-LC-ESI-MS/MS. The amino acid coverage of identified CTGF sequence is shown with the appraisal sequence in yellow. B The normalized spectrum count of CTGF in RA patients and HCs. C The level of CTGF in the synovial tissues of inactive RA patients (DAS28 < 3.32, n = 45), active RA patients (DAS28 > 3.32, n = 47), and HCs (n = 50) were detected by qPCR. D The level of CTGF in the FLS of RA patients (n = 16) and HCs (n = 16) was detected by qPCR. E The concentration of the serum CTGF from RA patients (n = 100) and HCs (n = 100) was determined by ELISA. F The expression of the CTGF of synovial tissue sections from RA patients and health controls were determined by IHC with a magnification of × 200

Full size image

Identification of ANXA2 as a partner interacting with CTGF

In order to screen potential CTGF interacting proteins, Co-IP were performed using anti-CTGF mAb in RA FLS lysates. Then, the protein was eluted from the beads, separated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, and subsequently detected by LC-MS/MS analysis (Fig. 2A). Of note, the proteins identified from LC-MS/MS were listed in Supplementary Table S3 among which human ANXA2 was evaluated with high amino acid coverage (Fig. 2B). Next, the interaction of CTGF with ANXA2 was further confirmed by Co-IP using anti-CTGF mAb and anti-ANXA2 mAb (Fig. 2C). Co-localization of CTGF and ANXA2 in FLS was observed by immunofluorescence (IF) (Fig. 2D). In summary, these results identified ANXA2 as a binding partner of CTGF.

Fig. 2
figure 2

ANXA2 is the specific protein that interacts with CTGF. A Base peak chromatography from LC-MS/MS analysis of the proteins separated by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis after Co-IP using anti-CTGF antibody with FLSs lysates. IgG was used as a control. B The amino acid coverage of the identified ANXA2 sequence is shown with the appraisal sequence in yellow. C Co-IP using anti-ANXA2 and anti-CTGF antibodies with FLS lysates. D Immunofluorescence of CTGF and ANXA2 was performed in FLSs with a magnification of × 400. E The concentration of the serum ANXA2 from RA patients (n = 100) and HCs (n = 100) was determined by ELISA. F The expression of ANXA2 mRNA in synovial tissues and FLSs from RA patients (n = 16) and HCs (n = 16) were detected by qPCR. G, H The expression of ANXA2 in synovial tissues and FLSs from RA patients (n = 16) and HCs (n = 16) were measured by WB. I The expression of the ANXA2 of synovial tissue sections from RA patients and HCs were determined by IHC with a magnification of × 40 and × 200. J Immunofluorescence of CTGF and ANXA2 performed in synovial tissues of RA patients with a magnification of × 200

Full size image

The expression of ANXA2 increased in RA patients

Compared with HCs, the concentrations of ANXA2 were higher in RA serum determined by ELISA (Fig. 2E). Consistent with these findings, the overexpression of ANXA2 was further validated by qPCR (Fig. 2F) and WB (Fig. 2G, H) both in the synovial tissues and FLS of RA patients compared with HCs. In addition, elevated expression of ANXA2 was also observed in synovial tissues of RA patients by IHC staining, which mainly expressed around the blood vessels (Fig. 2I). Moreover, co-localization of CTGF and ANXA2 in synovial tissues of RA patients was observed by IF (Fig. 2J).

The TSP1 domain of CTGF is essential in the interaction of CTGF and ANXA2

To further clarify which domain of CTGF was involved in ANXA2/CTGF interaction, we constructed several CTGF mutants (Fig. 3A). Next, Co-IP assays were performed using HEK293T cells transfected with these Flag-tagged mutants (Fig. 3B). The result showed that TSP1 domain of CTGF played an essential role in the interaction between CTGF and ANXA2. To further verify the function of the interaction in vivo, we subcloned CTGF-full length or TSP1-deleted mutants and ANXA2 into bimolecular fluorescent vectors pBiFC-VC155 and pBiFC-VN (I152L) vector, respectively, and BiFC was performed by co-transfecting them into HEK293T cells. As expected, VC155-CTGF and VN (I152L)-ANXA2 co-transfection group observed fluorescence, and no significant signal was detected in the VC155-CTGF-∆TSP1 group (Fig. 3C). These findings suggested that CTGF directly interacts with ANXA2, and the TSP1 domain of CTGF protein is necessary for the interaction.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The TSP1 domain of CTGF is the direct region that interact with ANXA2. A Schematic representations of full-length CTGF and its deletion mutants. B Co-IP using anti-ANXA2 and anti-FLAG antibodies with lysates of various deletion mutants transfected into HEK293T cells. C Fluorescence expression of pBiFC-VN155 (I152L)-ANXA2 co-transfected with pBiFC-VC155-CTGF or pBiFC-VC155-CTGF-∆TSP1 in HEK293T cells at a magnification of × 200. D Structure of TSP1 domain of CTGF by homology modeling. E Predicted binding mode of ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1, green and blue represent the ANXA2 and CTGF-TSP1 domain regions, respectively. F Root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the backbone atoms (C, CA, and N) of the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex as a function of time. G Conformations of the complex during molecular dynamics simulation

Full size image

Homology modeling and computational analysis of ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 combination

To explore the combining conformation of CTGF-TSP1 and ANXA2 at the molecular level, a multilevel computational analysis was performed. The structure of the TSP1 domain of CTGF protein is shown (Fig. 3D), and then CTGF and ANXA2 are successively docked and their conformations are appropriately selected according to the ZDOCK score (948.942) (Fig. 3E). To further assess the stability of the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex structure in the biomimetic environment, we conducted a 30-ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and tracked the RMSD variation of the complex (Fig. 3F). After 10 ns, ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 tended to be stable in the bionic circumstance with an RMSD value of 1.99 ± 0.24 Å. Next, during a 30-ns simulation, four snapshots of MD trajectory further characterized the conformational fluctuations of the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex (Fig. 3G). Additionally, as expected, no obvious conformational changes occurred during the simulation, which suggested a strong interaction between the CTGF-TSP1 domain and ANXA2 with stable combination.

ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex induced FLS proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis

It was generally reckoned that synovial hyperplasia and angiogenesis played an important role RA process. Our previous study has also verified the destructive role of CTGF in FLS proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis in RA [14, 15]. Therefore, we went on to explore the effect of the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex on FLS proliferation and migration. Three different CTGF shRNA lentiviral vectors were constructed and transfected into RA FLSs, and the shRNA2 group showed the most significant reduction by WB (Fig. 4A, B). Then, we constructed Flag-CTGF-full length and Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1 and rescued them in the CTGF-KD FLS. Besides, no significant difference was observed on ANXA2 expression both in Flag-CTGF-full length groups and control group, which indicated that CTGF cannot influence ANXA2 expression (Fig. 4C). Therefore, following the results above, we hypothesized that it should be the complex of ANXA2 and CTGF that induce RA process, and we performed cell proliferation and migration experiments. According to the results, the rescue of CTGF-full length promoted FLS proliferation and migration, but the rescue of CTGF-∆TSP1 showed no significant change compared to the control. Moreover, the knockdown of ANXA2 caused by co-transfecting LV-sh-ANXA2 suppressed FLS proliferation and migration compared to the rescue of CTGF or CTGF-∆TSP1 alone (Fig. 4D–F). Then, the angiogenesis ability of the ANXA2/CTGF complex was evaluated by tube formation experiment in vitro and CAM assays in vivo (Fig. 4G–J). As expected, an extreme loss of angiogenesis function was found in the ∆TSP1 group compared with the full-length group, and the knockdown of ANXA2 also showed a similar loss. According to these findings, we indicated that the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex played a role in FLS proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex is required on cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro. A, B The expression of CTGF in wild-type FLS and CTGF-KD FLS were measured by WB. The experiments were repeatedly performed using three independent samples. C The expression of Flag-CTGF/CTGF-∆TSP1 and ANXA2 in CTGF-KD FLS transfected with lentivirus (LV-CON, LV-Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1, LV-Flag-CTGF-full length, LV-sh-ANXA2+Flag-CTGF-full length, LV-sh-ANXA2+Flag-LV-CTGF-∆TSP1) were measured by WB. D MTT assay. CTGF-KD FLS were transfected with lentivirus (groups mentioned above in Fig. 4C, n = 3) and then incubated for 6 h, 12 h, 18 h, and 24 h. The absorbance value of each well at the 490-nm wavelength was measured. E Scratch migration assay. CTGF-KD FLS were seeded on a six-well plate and transfected with lentivirus (groups mentioned above in C, n = 3). After 24 h, a scratch was made along the diameter of the well using a pipette tip. An image was captured every 12 h by a camera under an inverted microscope (original magnification × 40). F The percentage of wound closure at 24 h was quantified as (area of original wound − area of measured wound)/area of original wound × 100%. G Tube formation assay. HUVECs were transfected with lentivirus (LV-Flag-CTGF-full length, LV-Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1, and LV-sh-ANXA2+Flag-CTGF-full length) and then incubated for 6 h, and then tube formation was observed and photographed (n = 10). H The number of intersections among the branches of assembled HUVEC networks was calculated in the whole field. I CAM assay. CAMs were treated with lentivirus (groups mentioned above in G) on day 7, and all CAMs were photographed 3 days later (n = 10). J The percentage of angiogenetic area = vascular area/CAM area × 100%. ImageJ was used to assess the vascular and CAM areas

Full size image

ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex aggravated inflammatory invasion in SCID mouse model

To further verify the effects of the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex in the RA process, we constructed a SCID mouse co-implantation model to assess the severity of invasion and inflammation (Fig. 5A). The results indicated that the rescue of Flag-CTGF-full length showed a significant induction of cartilage inflammatory invasion compared to CTGF-KD RA FLS, but the rescue of CTGF-∆TSP1 showed no obvious induction of cartilage inflammatory invasion. Additionally, ANXA2-KD exhibited obviously milder invasion compared to the rescue of Flag-CTGF-full length or Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1 alone (Fig. 5B, C). Moreover, the rescue of Flag-CTGF-full length deteriorated synovial hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration, and cartilage erosion and increased the histological score of the knee joint compared to the control, but the rescue of Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1 showed no significant change. Additionally, the destruction of the knee joint was maximally attenuated with ANXA2-KD compared to the rescue of Flag-CTGF-full length or Flag-CTGF-∆TSP1 alone (Fig. 5D, E). In conclusion, the results above indicated that the ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex forced FLS proliferation and migration to enhance angiogenesis and bone erosion (Fig. 5F).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The ANXA2/CTGF-TSP1 complex is responsible for the invasion and migration of RA FLS in the SCID model. Cartilage graft injected with the FLS (treated as methods above) was transplanted into SCID mice (n = 10 mice per group). A The schematic protocol for the FLS-cartilage-SCID model (arrow depicts the site of transplants.) B H&E staining of the cartilage removed from SCID mice with a magnification of × 200. The arrows indicate RA FLS invaded into the cartilage. C Measurement of invasion of RA FLS into human cartilage implants transferred under the skin of SCID mice. The level of invasiveness was scored as follows: 0 = no or minimal invasion, 1 = visible invasion (two-cell depth), 2 = invasion (five-cell depth), and 3 = deep invasion (more than ten-cell depth). The sections were examined by two experienced scientists in a blinded manner. D H&E staining of the knee joints of the SCID mice (original magnification, up × 40 and down × 100). E Histological scores for synovial infiltration, synovial hyperplasia, and cartilage and bone damage were assessed and graded on a scale of 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). F Interaction between the ANXA2 and TSP1 domain of CTGF forces FLS migration and pannus formation in the RA process

Full size image

Discussion

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by persistent synovitis and pannus formation, which result in cartilage destruction and bone erosion [1]. So far, anti-pannus formation treatment has been clinically discussed, however, target at it, a safe and effective therapeutic method is far from well-developed.

CTGF is a well-studied protein in arthritis; many studies confirmed its function on pannus formation. In our previous proteomic study, CTGF was screened as a hub-gene increased in RA patients [14]. Herein, we showed an increased expression of CTGF in RA patients even at an early stage, and no significant difference between the active and inactive groups confirm that CTGF can be used as an early RA diagnostic indicator, but not a RA activity staging indicator [15]. Functionally, Ding et al. and our previous study altogether indicated CTGF promoted FLS proliferation and migration and suppression of CTGF ameliorated neovascularization, suggesting CTGF induces pannus formation in RA [13, 14]. However, the detailed mechanism is still poorly discussed.

In recent years, the protein interaction network of CTGF raised wild concerns. Angiogenesis-related factors, such as VEGF and integrin family proteins, have been confirmed to interact with CTGF [24,25,26]. Therefore, we hypothesized that CTGF may induce pannus formation through protein binding and investigated CTGF interacted proteins in FLS using LC-MS/MS-based interactome analysis; eventually, ANXA2 was selected.

ANXA2 is a key protein implicated in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [27,28,29]. Specifically, in RA patients, ANXA2 expression were higher, and in the CIA mouse model, the overexpression of AXNA2 promoted neovascularization, indicating that ANXA2 may induce RA pannus formation [20]. Thus, it is obvious that ANXA2 and CTGF have a coincide effect on RA progress, but no study has reported their combination before. In this study, we confirmed a solid interaction between CTGF and ANXA2 by Co-IP and further focused on the exact domain of CTGF that combines ANXA2.

Although the three-dimensional (3D) structure of CTGF is still unclear, the 3D structure and biological function of CTGF domains were predicted and explored [30]. Molecular biological studies suggest four specific domains of CTGF, including IGFBP, VWC, TSP1, and CT, can interact with a variety of molecules, including cytokines, growth factors, receptors, and matrix proteins [30,31,32,33,34]. Importantly, a controversial effect of the TSP-1 domain of CTGF on angiogenesis was also raised. Inoki et al. reported that the TSP-1 domain of CTGF could bind VEGF and inhibits its function, which leads to the decreased angiogenic activity [26]. Conversely, another study reported that CTGF-targeting mAb inhibits angiogenesis induced by each module of CTGF including TSP-1, suggesting that the TSP-1 domain of CTGF promoted angiogenesis [35]. In this study, we confirmed a new protein ANXA2 that could be combined with the TSP-1 domain of CTGF, in addition to the three known proteins (Integrin α6β1, LRP, and VEGF), which can promote angiogenesis. Of note, we predicted the structure of ANXA2, CTGF-TSP1, and their complex by homology modeling, and the high stability of the complex was observed using dynamics simulation. Furthermore, we investigated the function of this complex. CTGF was the first knockdown in FLS and then rescued with CTGF-full length or CTGF-∆TSP1 lentivirus, co-transfected with ANXA2-shRNA, and performed MTT, cell scratch, and tube formation experiments. The result verified the interaction of the CTGF-TSP1 domain and ANXA2 could induce FLS proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis. To further confirm, we constructed an in vivo FLS-cartilage-SCID mouse model, a well-established model allowing quantification of FLS invasion and assessment of human cartilage destruction [36, 37]. We found decreased pannus formation, characterized by moderate synovial hyperplasia and less inflammatory infiltration, in the CTGF-TSP1 domain deleted and ANXA2 deficient group. According to these results, we demonstrate the interaction of the CTGF-TSP1 domain, and ANXA2 contributes to the proliferation and migration of RA FLS and angiogenesis, which finally leads to pannus formation.

In summary, our study raises the importance of the CTGF interaction network in RA pannus formation, states a new CTGF-combined protein ANXA2, and determines the exact binding site TSP1 domain as well as the function of CTGF-ANXA2 complex on FLS proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis. Indeed, the downstream mechanism of the CTGF-ANXA2 complex that induces angiogenesis needs further exploration. Our data shed light on the cross-talk in the FLS population, and this might help to better understand the cellular interactions during pannus formation and provide new insights into the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Conclusions

In summary, our results indicated that the TSP1 domain of CTGF was necessary for the interaction with ANXA2. Their cooperation enhanced both proliferation and migration of RA FLS and angiogenesis, as well as pannus formation in the FLS-cartilage-SCID model.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ANXA2:

Annexin A2

CAM:

Chick chorioallantoic membrane

CTGF:

Connective tissue growth factor

CO-IP:

Co-immunoprecipitation

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FLS:

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes

HE:

Hematoxylin and eosin

HUVEC:

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells

IHC:

Immunohistochemical staining

IF:

Immunofluorescence

LC-MS/MS:

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

qPCR:

Real-time quantitative PCR

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

SCID:

Severe combined immunodeficiency

â–³TSP1:

TSP1-deleted domain

References

  1. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2205–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsai C-Y, Shiau A-L, Chen S-Y, Chen Y-H, Cheng P-C, Chang M-Y, et al. Amelioration of collagen-induced arthritis in rats by nanogold. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2007;56:544–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bottini N, Firestein GS. Duality of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in RA: passive responders and imprinted aggressors. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9:24–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huh YH, Lee G, Lee KB, Koh JT, Chun JS, Ryu JH. HIF-2α-induced chemokines stimulate motility of fibroblast-like synoviocytes and chondrocytes into the cartilage-pannus interface in experimental rheumatoid arthritis mouse models. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fearon U, Canavan M, Biniecka M, Veale DJ. Hypoxia, mitochondrial dysfunction and synovial invasiveness in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatol. 2016;12:385–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabeh F, Fox D, Weiss SJ. Membrane-type I matrix metalloproteinase-dependent regulation of rheumatoid arthritis synoviocyte function. J Immunol. 2010;184:6396–406.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Rooy DP, Zhernakova A, Tsonaka R, Willemze A, Kurreeman BA, Trynka G, et al. A genetic variant in the region of MMP-9 is associated with serum levels and progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh A, Rajasekaran N, Hartenstein B, Szabowski S, Gajda M, Angel P, et al. Collagenase-3 (MMP-13) deficiency protects C57BL/6 mice from antibody-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szekanecz Z, Vegvari A, Szabo Z, Koch AE. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in arthritis. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2010;2:153–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartok B, Firestein GS. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes: key effector cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Immunological Reviews. 2010;233:233–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kubota S, Takigawa M. The CCN family acting throughout the body: recent research developments. BioMolecular Concepts. 2013;4:477-494.

  12. Nozawa K, Fujishiro M, Takasaki Y, Sekigawa I. Inhibition of rheumatoid arthritis by blocking connective tissue growth factor. World J Orthop. 2014;5:653–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ding S, Duan H, Fang F, Shen H, Xiao W. CTGF promotes articular damage by increased proliferation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016;45:282–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang JG, Xu WD, Zhai WT, Li Y, Hu JW, Hu B, et al. Disorders in angiogenesis and redox pathways are main factors contributing to the progression of rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative proteomics study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:993–1004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang X, Lin K, Ni S, Wang J, Tian Q, Chen H, et al. Serum connective tissue growth factor is a highly discriminatory biomarker for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19:257.

  16. Nozawa K, Fujishiro M, Kawasaki M, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda K, Morimoto S, et al. Inhibition of connective tissue growth factor ameliorates disease in a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1477–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chi-Yun W, Chiou-Feng L. Annexin A2: its molecular regulation and cellular expression in cancer development. Disease Markers. 2014;2014:308976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang B, Deora AB, He KL, Chen K, Sui G, Jacovina AT, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 drives annexin A2 system-mediated perivascular fibrin clearance in oxygen-induced retinopathy in mice. Blood. 2011;118:2918–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ling Q, Jacovina AT, Deora A, Febbraio M, Simantov R, Silverstein RL, et al. Annexin II regulates fibrin homeostasis and neoangiogenesis in vivo. J Clin Investigation. 2004;113:38–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yi J, Zhu Y, Jia Y, Jiang H, Zheng X, Liu D, et al. The annexin a2 promotes development in arthritis through neovascularization by amplification Hedgehog pathway. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scharf B, Clement CC, Wu XX, Morozova K, Zanolini D, Follenzi A, et al. Annexin A2 binds to endosomes following organelle destabilization by particulate wear debris. Nature Communications. 2012;3:755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taniguchi K, Kohsaka H, Inoue N, Terada Y, Ito H, Hirokawa K, et al. Induction of the p16INK4a senescence gene as a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Medicine. 1999;5:760–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei Y, Yang D, Du X, Yu X, Zhang M, Tang F, et al. Interaction between DMRT1 and PLZF protein regulates self-renewal and proliferation in male germline stem cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2021;476:1123–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei JL, Fu W, Hettinghouse A, He WJ, Lipson KE, Liu CJ. ADAMTS-12 protects against inflammatory arthritis through interacting with and inactivating proinflammatory CTGF. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:1745–56.

  25. Pi L, Jorgensen M, Oh SH, Protopapadakis Y, Gjymishka A, Brown A, et al. A disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type I motif 7: a new protease for connective tissue growth factor in hepatic progenitor/oval cell niche. Am J Pathol. 2015;185:1552–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Inoki I, Shiomi T, Hashimoto G, Enomoto H, Nakamura H, Makino K, et al. Connective tissue growth factor binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inhibits VEGF-induced angiogenesis. FASEB J. 2002;16:219–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mao L, Yuan W, Cai K, Lai C, Huang C, Xu Y, et al. EphA2-YES1-ANXA2 pathway promotes gastric cancer progression and metastasis. Oncogene. 2021;40:3610–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang J, Guo B, Zhang Y, Cao J, Chen T. Silencing of the annexin II gene down-regulates the levels of S100A10, c-Myc, and plasmin and inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Saudi Med J. 2010;31:374–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma M, Blackman MR, Sharma MC. Antibody-directed neutralization of annexin II (ANX II) inhibits neoangiogenesis and human breast tumor growth in a xenograft model. Exp Mol Pathol. 2012;92:175–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen Z, Zhang N, Chu HY, Yu Y, Zhang ZK, Zhang G, et al. Connective tissue growth factor: from molecular understandings to drug discovery. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:593269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Allard JB, Duan C. IGF-binding proteins: why do they exist and why are there so many? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang JL, Qiu LY, Kotzsch A, Weidauer S, Patterson L, Hammerschmidt M, et al. Crystal structure analysis reveals how the Chordin family member crossveinless 2 blocks BMP-2 receptor binding. Dev Cell. 2008;14:739–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gao R, Brigstock DR. Connective tissue growth factor (CCN2) induces adhesion of rat activated hepatic stellate cells by binding of its C-terminal domain to integrin αvβ3 and heparan sulfate proteoglycan. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:8848–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pi L, Ding X, Jorgensen M, Pan JJ, Oh SH, Pintilie D, et al. Connective tissue growth factor with a novel fibronectin binding site promotes cell adhesion and migration during rat oval cell activation. Hepatology. 2008;47:996–1004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miyashita T, Morimoto S, Fujishiro M, Hayakawa K, Suzuki S, Ikeda K, et al. Inhibition of each module of connective tissue growth factor as a potential therapeutic target for rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmunity. 2016;49:109–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fu D, Yang Y, Xiao Y, Lin H, Ye Y, Zhan Z, et al. Role of p21-activated kinase 1 in regulating the migration and invasion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51:1170–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Knedla A, Riepl B, Lefevre S, Kistella S, Grifka J, Straub RH, et al. The therapeutic use of osmotic minipumps in the severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:124–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (No. 2019C03023) and the National Natural Science Foundations of China (No. 81971539).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Guoyu Yin and Chenglin Yang contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, School of the Second Clinical Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China

    Guoyu Yin, Gan Wu, Shengwei Jin & Jianguang Wang

  2. Department of Biochemistry, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang Province, China

    Guoyu Yin, Xinxin Yu, Qingqing Tian, Ben Cao, Lin Zhao, Nannan Xu, Wei Zhang & Jianguang Wang

  3. Qiushi Academy for Advanced Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Chenglin Yang

  4. Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

    Daoxing Chen

Authors
  1. Guoyu Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chenglin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinxin Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qingqing Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daoxing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ben Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nannan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shengwei Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jianguang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZW and WJG conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination. YXX, CDX, CB, XNN, and ZL collected the samples and carried out the ELISA assay. CB, XNN, WG, YXX, and ZL performed the SCID model experiment. YGY, ZW, ZL, and TQQ carried out the Co-IP experiment and BiFc assay. WG, JSW, CDX, YXX, and XNN performed the molecular docking. ZW, YCL, WG, and JSW conducted the proteomics data analysis. YCL, YGY, JSW, TQQ, and WJG performed the statistical analysis. TQQ, YCL, YGY, ZW, and WJG drafted and revised the manuscript. YGY and YCL made equal contributions to this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Zhang or Jianguang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committees of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (No. 2016157). All patients who participated in this study provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Analysis of the ELISA results revealed no linear correlation between CTGF and ANXA2 with r=0.08627, p>0.05.

Additional file 2.

Supplementary methods.

Additional file 3: Table S1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with RA and healthy controls. Values are expressed median (minimum, maximum) unless state otherwise. Abbreviations: ACPA, anticitrullinated protein antibodies; CRP, C reactive protein; DAS-28, disease activity score 28 joints; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RF, rheumatoid factor; NA, not applicable.

Additional file 4: Table S2.

Sequences of qRT-PCR primers, cDNA primers and shRNA-targeting genes.

Additional file 5: Table S3.

LC-MS/MS identification of proteins isolated from FLS lysates of RA patients by immunoprecipitation using Anti-CTGF antibody.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, G., Yang, C., Wu, G. et al. The protein-protein interaction between connective tissue growth factor and annexin A2 is relevant to pannus formation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 23, 266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02656-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02656-y

Keywords

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
  • Pannus formation
  • Annexin A2 (ANXA2)
  • Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF)

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us