Skip to main content

Sine scleroderma, limited cutaneous, and diffused cutaneous systemic sclerosis survival and predictors of mortality



Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with a variability of mortality rates in the literature.


To determine the mortality and its predictors in a long-term follow-up of a bi-centric cohort of SSc patients.


A retrospective observational study by systematically analyzing the medical records of patients diagnosed with SSc in Toulouse University Hospital and Ducuing Hospital. Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR), mortality at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years of disease and causes of death were described. Predictors of mortality using Cox regression were assessed.


Three hundred seventy-five patients were included: 63 with diffuse cutaneous SSc, 279 with limited cutaneous SSc, and 33 with sine scleroderma. The SMR ratio was 1.88 (95% CI 1.46–1.97). The overall survival rates were 97.6% at 1 year, 93.4% at 3 years, 87.1% at 5 years, 77.9% at 10 years, and 61.3% at 15 years. Sixty-nine deaths were recorded. 46.4% were SSc related deaths secondary to interstitial lung disease (ILD) (34.4%), pulmonary hypertension (31.2%), and digestive tract involvement (18.8%). 53.6% were non-related to SSc: cardiovascular disorders (37.8%) and various infections (35.1%) largely distanced those from cancer (13.5%). Four significant independent predictive factors were identified: carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) < 70% (HR=3.01; p=0.0053), C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/l (HR=2.13; p=0.0174), cardiac involvement (HR=2.86; p=0.0012), and the fact of being male (HR=3.25; p=0.0004).


Long-term data confirmed high mortality of SSc. Male sex, DLCO <70%, cardiac involvement, and CRP> 5mg/l were identified as independent predictors of mortality.


• Male sex, cardiac involvement, DLCO <70%, and CRP > 5 mg/l are strong predictors of mortality in systemic sclerosis.

• This study shows the survival of subtypes and in particular sine scleroderma.

• Sine scleroderma subtype has better survival than diffuse or limited cutaneous subtypes.

• Non-systemic sclerosis-related deaths are more frequent than systemic sclerosis-related deaths.

• Cardiovascular events non-systemic sclerosis-related are the main deaths.

Key messages

  • One of the first studies that ascertained sine scleroderma mortality rate versus diffuse and limited subtypes

  • 4 predictors of at 5, 10 years, and all mortality: male sex, cardiac involvement, DLCO <70%, and CRP > 5 mg/l.

  • Importance of cardiovascular causes in non-systemic sclerosis-related death


Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe systemic autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by an elevated standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of 1.34 to 7.18 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Because the presentation and prognosis of SSc are highly heterogeneous, studies showed a 10-year survival rate between 50 and 84% [4, 18,19,20,21].

Such mortality is still related to SSc in 27 to 72% of cases [3, 6, 8, 16,17,18, 21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. The two main causes of death remain interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, the SSc-non-related causes of death are increasing, particularly cardiovascular diseases, and infections [3, 6, 8, 15, 18, 19].

Assessment of prognosis is crucial to identify the patient who may benefit from close monitoring and immunosuppressants or autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation [20]. Given the wide variability of mortality rate reported in the literature, it appeared essential to obtain a better understanding of SSc prognosis and its associated risk factors in a well-characterized incident SSc cohort. The objective of the present study was to estimate mortality in the Systemic Scleroderma Toulouse Cohort (SSTC) in order to determine risk factors and causes of death.

Methods and materials

Data source

Data were obtained from the SSTC which includes incident patients with SSc who fulfilled the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria and 2001 LeRoy and Medsger classification [28, 29], with retrospective collection of data between January 1, 1978, and May 30, 2018, and prospective onwards. The SSTC is a bi-centric cohort from the Toulouse University Hospital, a tertiary referral center for SSc, and Joseph Ducuing Hospital, a secondary referral center. Patients were selected through the coding system PMSI (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d’Informations) and through the Doctors’ active patient files. Concerning the coding system PMSI, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) was used (M34, M34.1, M34.8, M34.8+J99.1, M34.8+ G73.7, M34.9), as we described in a previous study [30].

A thorough medical chart review followed by the entry of the standardized data collection form, for all consecutive unselected incident SSc patients were performed. SSc sub-types were classified as “diffuse SSc,” “limited SSc,” and “SSc sine scleroderma” [31]. Localized scleroderma patients (morphea and linear disease) were not included in the SSTC. The standardized data collection covered demographic aspects, disease duration, organ involvement, laboratory data, and drug exposure. Patients with more 25% of missing data were excluded. Disease onset was defined as the date of the first non–Raynaud’s phenomenon symptom attributable to SSc. Annual follow-up examinations were carried out. The forms were filled out by SSc specialists. Patients gave informed consent to participate in the SSTC. The data at baseline and at each follow-up evaluations (each annual follow-up and/or acute complication) were collected in the SSTC as part of routine clinical care in accordance to Good Clinical Practice and complied with the requirements of the Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté (CNIL) (registration No. 914607). In compliance with French regulation relating to clinical non-interventional research, this study does not require ethics committee approval.


For the present study, we included adult (≥18 years) incident SSc subjects who had at least one follow-up visit during the first years in the SSTC and a disease onset between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2018. Patients were followed until May 31, 2018.

Collected data

Data collected at the inclusion visit were sex, ethnic group, age at disease onset, date of the first Raynaud’s phenomenon symptom, date of the first non–Raynaud’s phenomenon symptom, body mass index (BMI), smoking habits, SSc sub-types according to Leroy and Medsger [31], presence of arthralgia, myalgia, calcinosis or tendon friction rubs [32], gastrointestinal (GI) complications [33], neurological involvement [34], skin involvement as measured by the Rodnan modified skin score (mRSS) [35], and cardiac [36] and pulmonary evaluation [37], including pulmonary function tests (Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO)) according to the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) consensus standards [38], presence of SSc-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) or pleural effusion on chest X-ray or on high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), results from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV, m/s), and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP, mmHg) measurement [39]. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was confirmed as a mean PAP ≥25 mmHg and was considered a SSc-associated pre-capillary PAH when associated with a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤ 15 mmHg [40]. Cardiac involvement was defined by LVEF <50%, and/or TTE abnormalities (pericarditis, cardiac valvulopathy, or diastolic dysfunction), and/or an electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality (arrhythmia or conduction blocks). Atrial and ventricular arrhythmia were included in arrythmia. Any cardiac symptoms appearing prior to SSc diagnosis were considered as having no connection with the disease under study. The scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) was defined as a new onset of significant systemic hypertension (>150/85 mmHg) and acute renal failure (≥30% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate) [2, 41,42,43,44]. Laboratory parameters collected were hemoglobin level, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, albumin, antinuclear (ANA), anti-centromere (ACA), anti-SCL70, anti RNA polymerase III, anti PM/Scl, anti-TIF1-y, and ANCA [45, 46]. If the clinical information was missing, this information was counted as missing data.

Mortality data

Survival status was ascertained up until the end of this study based on the records in the database and systematically verified in each medical chart, telephone tracing of patient’s general practitioner (GP), telephone tracing of patients in whom no data had been entered for ≥24 months in the database, and systematic interrogation of either the Registre d’état civil [47]. The final status of loss to follow-up was defined as one where no data had been entered for ≥ 24 months with a failure to contact the patient or his GP despite at least two attempts, no death recorded in either the Registre d’état civil [47] and in French database recording deaths “”

Calculation of standardized mortality ratio

The SMR and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated according to the ratio of observed death in the cohort to the number of deaths of the French age/sex-matched population [48]. The mortality rates of the general population were obtained from the French National Statistical Agency (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques - INSEE), and the most recent available data at the time of data analysis were from December 2016 [49]. In relation to subjects lost to follow-up, we performed 2 sensitivity analyses to recalculate SMR, one of which assumed that all such subjects were alive at the end of the study and the other of which assumed that all such subjects were dead at the end of the study.

Causes of death

A standardized death case report form was extracted from the SSTC database. Cause of death was then systematically verified against source documents. The causes of death were categorized as a single primary cause (either SSc or non-SSc-related) and all other SSc organ involvements that contributed to death. Death was attributed to SSc if the cause was identified with the specific organ involved. Death not attributed to SSc in the following cases:

  • When the specific organ involved was cited in a diagnosis prior to SSc diagnosis, except typical scleroderma involvement

  • Sudden inexplicable death

  • Death from events with no direct link to SSc.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SD for continuous variables, the median and interquartile range for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and the number and percent for categorical variables. Baseline characteristics were compared using ANOVA variance analysis for continuous variables, and a chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables depending on the sample size.

Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with comparisons performed using the log rank test. The primary end point was death from any cause or data censoring. The follow-up period ended in May 30, 2018.

Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models (ascending step-by-step method) were used to determine baseline variables associated with mortality. Variables with p value ≤0.05 in univariate analysis were selected for multivariate analysis. Analysis of the co-linearities variables were used to multivariable Cox model: PAPs >35 mmHg and Raynaud’s syndrome appearing after age 45 were not taken into account in the multi-variate analysis given the co-linearities respectively with the DLCO< 70% of the theoretical value and disease onset after the age of 50 years old.

Two-tailed P values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS® software (French version 9.4).


Characteristics of the population

We included 375 patients (292 females): 63 (15.2%) with diffuse cutaneous SSc, 279 (76.7%) with limited cutaneous SSc and 33 (8.1%) with SSc sine scleroderma between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2018 (Fig. 1). The characteristics of patients at disease onset are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart showing selecting patients from Systemic Scleroderma Toulouse Cohort

Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients from systemic Scleroderma Toulouse cohort at baseline

SMR and survival analysis

During the study period, 69 patients died (18.4%) and 6 patients (only women, one sine scleroderma sub-type and 5 diffuse SSc) were lost to follow-up. The mean ± SD age at the time of death was 69.1 ± 14.8 years for SSc patients, 72 ± 15.5 and 64.2 ± 12.3 years, for women and men, respectively. The age—and sex-adjusted SMR of the cohort was 1.88 (95% CI 1.46–1.97) assuming that all subjects lost to follow-up were alive or 2.04 (95% CI 1.60–2.13) assuming that they were dead. Age-adjusted SMR for men was 3.61 (95% CI 2.35–3.94). Age-adjusted SMR for women was 1.80 (95% CI 1.31–1.92) assuming that all women lost to follow-up were alive or 2.05 (95% CI 1.52–2.18) assuming that they were dead. Age- and sex-adjusted SMR for diffuse subtype was 3.31 (95% CI 1.88–3.76). Age- and sex-adjusted SMR for limited cutaneous and sine scleroderma subtype was 1.74 (95% CI 1.30–1.85) and 1.03 (95% CI 0.20–1.49), respectively, assuming that all patients lost to follow-up were alive or 1.91 (95% CI 1.44–1.98) and 1.37 (95% CI 0.36–1.86) assuming that they were dead.

The overall survival rates were 97.6% at 1 year, 93.4% at 3 years, 87.1% at 5 years, 77.9% at 10 years, and 61.3% at 15 years (Fig. 2). Survival for patients with SSc sine scleroderma tended to be the best. Indeed, the survival rates were for diffuse, limited cutaneous, and sine scleroderma sub-types 95.1%, 97.4%, 100% at 1 year; 89.8, 93, and 100% at 3 years; 85.5, 86.6, and 88.9% at 5 years; 69.7, 78.6, and 81.9% at 10 years; and 54.9, 59.7, and 81.9% at 15 years, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival following disease onset in the Systemic Scleroderma Toulouse Cohort according to SSc sub-types

Predictors of mortality

Univariable Cox hazards analyses showed that subjects with male sex, Raynaud’s phenomenon onset after the age of 45, disease onset after the age of 50, cardiac involvement, PAPs > 35 mm Hg, DLCO <70%, FVC <65%, SRC, anemia, CRP > 5 mg/l, and albumin < 35 g/l had a higher risk of death (see Appendix). Multivariable Cox hazards regression analysis for all mortality in the cohort showed that male sex (HR=3.25 95%CI 1.69–6.22; p=0.0004), cardiac involvement (HR=2.86 95%CI 1.54–5.41; p=0.0012), DLCO<70% (HR=3.01 95%CI 1.40–6.88; p=0.0053), and a CRP >5 mg/l (HR=2.13 95%CI 1.11–5.41; p=0.0174) were independent predictors of risk (Table 2). The results of the two sensitivity analyses performed to account for predictors of mortality at 5 and 10 years, respectively, were consistent with those of the primary analysis (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariable predictors of mortality in the systemic Scleroderma Toulouse cohort at 5, 10 years, and all mortality

Causes of death

Between January 2000 and May 2018, there were 69 deaths (42 [62.3%] women). Death was considered SSc-related in 32 cases (46.4%) and unrelated to SSc in 37 cases (53.6%). Among the SSc-related death, three main causes were identified: ILD (34.4%), PH (31.2%), and GI involvement (18.8%) (Fig. 3A). The most common causes of non-SSc-related death were cardiovascular events (37.8%) and infections (35.1%) well in front of malignancies (13.5%) (Fig. 3B). Thus, the principal causes of non-SSc-related death were cardiovascular with sudden cardiac arrest (24.3%), myocardial infarction (5.4%), and mesenteric ischemia (5.4%). Pneumonia predominated among the infections.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Primary causes of deaths in Systemic Scleroderma Toulouse Cohort. A Percentages of causes of death related to systemic sclerosis. B Percentages of causes of death non-related to systemic sclerosis. The bars in bold correspond to the groups of causes of death and in the same color are represented the different etiologies. MI myocardial infarction, PH pulmonary hypertension, SSc systemic sclerosis, UTI urinary tract infection


This study still clearly confirmed an increased mortality risk from SSc, compared with the general healthy population. This is one of the only to describe the mortality rate of SSc sine scleroderma. Male sex, cardiac involvement, systemic inflammation, and altered DLCO were independent mortality risk factors. The majority of deaths (53.6%) was not attributed to SSc directly, especially cardiovascular mortality (37.8%).

Our SMR is lower than those produced in the two most recent meta-analyses focusing on mortality in SSc. Rubio-Rivas et al. [8], analyzing 17 articles from 1964 to 2005, found an SMR of 2.72 (95% CI 1.93–3.83). More recently, Pokeerbux et al. [11] reported an SMR of 5.73 (95% CI 4.68–6.94) from a French multi-centered cohort of patients suffering from SSc. The latter also carried out a meta-analysis of 18 articles with a pooled SMR of 3.45 (95% CI 3.03–3.94). However, the literature reveals a wide variability of mortality rate in SSc, with SMRs ranging from 1.34 to 7.18 [8, 10, 11, 17]. Such variability is probably caused by considerable methodological differences in the various studies carried out, differences in time origin from which survival time is calculated and this disease high heterogeneity. The elevated SMR figure in the Pokeerbux et al. cohort study [11] could also be explain by the over-representation of patients with anti-SCL70 antibodies (35% in their study vs. 23.8% in our cohort). Other explanations could account for our SMR within the lower range of published data such as a lower number of diffuse cutaneous subtype of SSc (16.8% vs. 23.4 to 46%) [8,9,10,11, 19, 40,41,42,43,44], a lower number of patients with a SRC (2.4% compared to 2.9–10%) [9,10,11, 19, 40, 44], and a less extended level of cutaneous involvement (average Rodnan skin score of 6.8 for the patients in the present study vs. 9) [11]. Regarding SRC, we described the same incidence as in the recent German epidemiological study evaluating renal involvement on 2873 patients with SSc [50]. In addition, we kept in our analysis SSc sine scleroderma, which is often excluded from such studies that could explain our relatively low SMR. Indeed, sine scleroderma subtype tended to have the best survival in our study with more 80% of survival rate at 15 years; the same result was found by Siméon-Aznar et al. [51]. The SMR of our cohort more approximated “mortality with real life,” taking into account the different subtypes of SSc, in particular sine scleroderma subtype.

Our overall survival rates at 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years were consistent with those reported previously [8, 9, 11, 23, 26]. In addition, we have shown a non-significant higher mortality rate from the diffuse cutaneous sub-type vs. the limited cutaneous subtype and the sine scleroderma subtype of SSc, in line with the published literature [8, 11, 18, 24, 25, 52,53,54]. However, the absence of significance may be related to an underpowered sample size for this analysis.

Our study identified 4 independent predictors of mortality: male sex, cardiac involvement, DLCO <70% of predicted, and CRP >5 mg/ml, which were consistent with previous studies [11, 23, 52, 55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. Indeed, a low DLCO in SSc often associated with ILD and/or PH (essentially pulmonary arterial hypertension and secondary pulmonary hypertension resulting from ILD), the two main causes of SSc-related mortality. Male SSc patients often presented with a worst prognostic than female SSc patients [11, 60, 62, 63], like in our cohort. Cardiac involvement during the course of SSc is also associated with an increased risk of mortality, especially pericardial effusion [11, 57, 59, 64], valvular disease [11], and an LVEF <50% [23]. In our study, cardiac involvement was a composite outcome including LVEF <50%, and/or a TTE anomaly (pericarditis, valvulopathy, or diastolic dysfunction), and/or an ECG anomaly (arrhythmia or conduction blocks), which was strongly associated with a 2.9-fold increase mortality risk (HR=2.86 95% CI 1.54–5.41). Finally, we confirmed that systemic inflammation was a major pejorative prognostic factor of mortality (HR 2.13 95%CI 1.11–5.41) like reported by few studies [11, 23, 53]. Diffuse subtype does not appear as a prognosis factor; this result can be explained by an underpowered sample size of diffuse and anti-SCL70 subtypes for this analysis. In several studies, diffuse subtype is a strong prognosis factor. Thus, in EUSTAR cohort, diffuse subtype does not appear to be a major factor in mortality (HR 0.79 (0.67 to 0.93)) [12]. In the SCleroderma mOrtality p Eustar (SCOpE), a score predicting mortality from EUstar cohort, diffuse subtype was one of the least weighted criteria after DLCO<60%, age, dyspnea, LVEF <50%, FVC<70%, and renal involment [12]. As already discussed, the incidence of this complication has decreased, and in our cohort, we have a lower rate of this involvement that others studies. It was a possible explanation that diffuse subtype is not a risk factor for mortality in our study.

One of the most interesting results of our study was that the majority of identified death in the SSTC cohort was not related to SSc directly. Due to a better understanding of SSc and a better management of this severe systemic disease, SSc-related deaths became less frequent [3, 18]. The first cause of non-SSc related in our work was cardiovascular diseases in a higher proportion than in previous large cohort studies (2–11.9%) [8, 9, 18, 62]. The cardiovascular-related deaths are represented mainly by sudden cardiac arrest. The majority of cardiac arrest cases, occurring at the patient’s home, were diagnosed by general practitioner and thus could be subject to a bias. However, 46.4% of the deaths in our cohort were directly attributable to SSc. Our results were consistent with the data from the EUSTAR cohort, finding that nowadays, the two main causes of SSc-related were ILD and PH [3, 6, 18, 23, 25, 52, 53, 62]. SSc GI-related mortality was frequent in our cohort (18.2%), and this cause of death represented 7.6% of deaths in metanalysis of Rubi-Rivas et al. [8]. Due to our strict methodology with a thorough medical chart review and systematic telephone tracing of patient’s general practitioner to ascertain cause of death, we were perhaps more able to identify this complication and its prognosis.

The major strengths of the present study are that we carried out an exhaustive medical chart review for each included patient, which led to detailed clinical and laboratory characteristics in a large cohort of incident patients. We ascertained vital status and cause of death by systematically interrogated the SSTC database, reviewed each medical chart a second time, called each patient’s GP, and interrogated the Registre d’état civil [47]. Other major strengths of this study are the long-term follow-up of patients, a very low attrition rate, as only six patients were lost to follow-up covering a period of 18 years and that we kept for the analysis SSc sine scleroderma which is often excluded from clinical trial and cohort studies. Thus, this study provides the sine scleroderma subtype survival. Probably, our overall SMR is more pertinent, not excluding the subtypes.

Οur study has some limitations. Our study is necessarily limited by its retrospective and bi-centric nature. Because it is a retrospective study, misclassification of systemic sclerosis subtypes is possible and induces a classification bias. Additionally, we did not include information about the treatments used during the follow-up due to heterogeneity in time of treatment initiation and the duration or type of treatment administered and as a consequence the effect of the various treatments in the natural course of the disease could not be eradicated. Concerning causes of deaths, potential interactions between SSc-related and unrelated to SSc may exist; this distinction is sometimes not perfectly clear. However, our results are coherent with results in others studies, like EUSTAR cohort. Finally, as with all the large cohorts collected over many years, there is the bias of survival. The longer the period covered, the greater is the risk of losing track of dead patients, and thus survival data could be distorted.


In conclusion, our results show that mortality is still substantial in SSc despite constant therapeutic progress. This is one the first study that ascertained SSc sine scleroderma mortality rate alongside the two other sub type of SSc. This serves as an important reference for future survival analysis and epidemiology surveys. Our study identifies strong predictors of mortality male sex, cardiac involvement, DLCO <70%, and CRP > 5 mg/l. Non-SSc-related death is more frequent than SSc-related deaths, of whom cardiovascular disease is the most common. An early and systematic management of the large proportion of cardiac complications is in order, in hope of extending SSc outcome.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available in a public, open access repository.







American Thoracic Society


Body mass index


Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté


Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (% predicted value)




European Respiratory Society


Forced vital capacity (% predicted value)




High resolution computed tomography


Interstitial lung disease


Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques


Left ventricular ejection fraction


Modified Rodnan skin score


Pulmonary arterial hypertension


Pulmonary arterial systolic pressure


Pulmonary artery wedge pressure


Pulmonary hypertension


Raynaud’s phenomena


Standard deviation


Standardized mortality ratio


Scleroderma renal crisis


Systemic sclerosis


Systemic Scleroderma Toulouse Cohort


Tricuspid regurgitation velocity


Trans-thoracic echogragraphy


  1. Steen VD, Medsger TA. Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972-2002. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:940–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bussone G, Bérezné A, Pestre V, Guillevin L, Mouthon L. The scleroderma kidney: progress in risk factors, therapy, and prevention. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011;13:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubio-Rivas M, Simeón-Aznar CP, Velasco C, Marí-Alfonso B, Espinosa G, Corbella X, et al. Changes in the pattern of death of 987 patients with systemic sclerosis from 1990 to 2009 from the nationwide Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(Suppl 106):40–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scussel-Lonzetti L, Joyal F, Raynauld J-P, Roussin A, Rich E, Goulet J-R, et al. Predicting mortality in systemic sclerosis: analysis of a cohort of 309 French Canadian patients with emphasis on features at diagnosis as predictive factors for survival. Medicine. 2002;81:154–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hissaria P, Lester S, Hakendorf P, Woodman R, Patterson K, Hill C, et al. Survival in scleroderma: results from the population-based South Australian Register. Intern Med J. 2011;41:381–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elhai M, Meune C, Avouac J, Kahan A, Allanore Y. Trends in mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis over 40 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2012;51:1017–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sampaio-Barros PD, Bortoluzzo AB, Marangoni RG, Rocha LF, Del Rio APT, Samara AM, et al. Survival, causes of death, and prognostic factors in systemic sclerosis: analysis of 947 Brazilian patients. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:1971–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rubio-Rivas M, Royo C, Simeón CP, Corbella X, Fonollosa V. Mortality and survival in systemic sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44:208–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hao Y, Hudson M, Baron M, Carreira P, Stevens W, Rabusa C, et al. Early mortality in a multinational systemic sclerosis inception cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:1067–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ioannidis JPA, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Haidich A-B, Medsger TA, Lucas M, Michet CJ, et al. Mortality in systemic sclerosis: an international meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Med. 2005;118:2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pokeerbux MR, Giovannelli J, Dauchet L, Mouthon L, Agard C, Lega JC, et al. Survival and prognosis factors in systemic sclerosis: data of a French multicenter cohort, systematic review, and meta-analysis of the literature. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bryan C, Knight C, Black CM, Silman AJ. Prediction of five-year survival following presentation with scleroderma: development of a simple model using three disease factors at first visit. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:2660–5.<2660::AID-ANR23>3.0.CO;2-N.

  13. Jacobsen S, Ullman S, Shen GQ, Wiik A, Halberg P. Influence of clinical features, serum antinuclear antibodies, and lung function on survival of patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:2454–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuo C-F, See L-C, Yu K-H, Chou I-J, Tseng W-Y, Chang H-C, et al. Epidemiology and mortality of systemic sclerosis: a nationwide population study in Taiwan. Scand J Rheumatol. 2011;40:373–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferri C, Valentini G, Cozzi F, Sebastiani M, Michelassi C, La Montagna G, et al. Systemic sclerosis: demographic, clinical, and serologic features and survival in 1,012 Italian patients. Medicine. 2002;81:139–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffmann-Vold A-M, Molberg Ø, Midtvedt Ø, Garen T, Gran JT. Survival and causes of death in an unselected and complete cohort of Norwegian patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:1127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Strickland G, Pauling J, Cavill C, Shaddick G, McHugh N. Mortality in systemic sclerosis-a single centre study from the UK. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:1533–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M, Airò P, Cozzi F, Carreira PE, et al. Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1809–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bennett R, Bluestone R, Holt PJ, Bywaters EG. Survival in scleroderma. Ann Rheum Dis. 1971;30:581–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alamanos Y, Tsifetaki N, Voulgari PV, Siozos C, Tsamandouraki K, Alexiou GA, et al. Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis in northwest Greece 1981 to 2002. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005;34:714–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Joven BE, Almodovar R, Carmona L, Carreira PE. Survival, causes of death, and risk factors associated with mortality in Spanish systemic sclerosis patients: results from a single university hospital. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010;39:285–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Assassi S, Del Junco D, Sutter K, McNearney TA, Reveille JD, Karnavas A, et al. Clinical and genetic factors predictive of mortality in early systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1403–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Elhai M, Meune C, Boubaya M, Avouac J, Hachulla E, Balbir-Gurman A, et al. Mapping and predicting mortality from systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1897–905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hachulla E, Carpentier P, Gressin V, Diot E, Allanore Y, Sibilia J, et al. Risk factors for death and the 3-year survival of patients with systemic sclerosis: the French ItinérAIR-Sclérodermie study. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2009;48:304–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simeón CP, Armadans L, Fonollosa V, Solans R, Selva A, Villar M, et al. Mortality and prognostic factors in Spanish patients with systemic sclerosis. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2003;42:71–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferri C, Sebastiani M, Lo Monaco A, Iudici M, Giuggioli D, Furini F, et al. Systemic sclerosis evolution of disease pathomorphosis and survival. Our experience on Italian patients’ population and review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:1026–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. van den Hombergh WM, Knaapen-Hans HK, van den Hoogen FH, Carreira P, Distler O, Hesselstrand R, et al. Prediction of organ involvement and survival in systemic sclerosis patients in the first 5 years from diagnosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2020;5:57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. LeRoy EC, Medsger TA. Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1573–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1747–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Almeida Chaves S, Derumeaux H, Do Minh P, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Moulis G, Pugnet G. Assessment of the accuracy of using ICD-10 codes to identify systemic sclerosis. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:1355–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, Jablonska S, Krieg T, Medsger TA, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Avouac J, Walker U, Tyndall A, Kahan A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Allanore Y, et al. Characteristics of joint involvement and relationships with systemic inflammation in systemic sclerosis: results from the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research Group (EUSTAR) database. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:1488–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shreiner AB, Murray C, Denton C, Khanna D. Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2016;1:247–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Amaral TN, Peres FA, Lapa AT, Marques-Neto JF, Appenzeller S. Neurologic involvement in scleroderma: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;43:335–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Steen VD, Medsger TA, Rodnan GP. D-Penicillamine therapy in progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): a retrospective analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:652–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fernández-Codina A, Simeón-Aznar CP, Pinal-Fernandez I, Rodríguez-Palomares J, Pizzi MN, Hidalgo CE, et al. Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis: differences between clinical subsets and influence on survival. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37:75–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bernstein EJ, Jaafar S, Assassi S, Domsic RT, Frech TM, Gordon JK, et al. Performance characteristics of pulmonary function tests for the detection of interstitial lung disease in adults with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020.

  38. Graham BL, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Cooper BG, Jensen R, Kendrick A, et al. ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2017;2017:49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Coghlan JG, Denton CP, Grünig E, Bonderman D, Distler O, Khanna D, et al. Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1340–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery J-L, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J. 2015;46:903–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Denton CP, Lapadula G, Mouthon L, Müller-Ladner U. Renal complications and scleroderma renal crisis. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2009;48(Suppl 3):iii32–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mouthon L, Bussone G, Berezné A, Noël L-H, Guillevin L. Scleroderma renal crisis. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:1040–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mouthon L, Bérezné A, Bussone G, Noël L-H, Villiger PM, Guillevin L. Scleroderma renal crisis: a rare but severe complication of systemic sclerosis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2011;40:84–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Guillevin L, Bérezné A, Seror R, Teixeira L, Pourrat J, Mahr A, et al. Scleroderma renal crisis: a retrospective multicentre study on 91 patients and 427 controls. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2012;51:460–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cepeda EJ, Reveille JD. Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis and fibrosing syndromes: clinical indications and relevance. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16:723–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Steen VD. Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005;35:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Etat civil en ligne. FranceArchives n.d. (Accessed 14 July 2020).

  48. Naing NN. Easy way to learn standardization: direct and indirect methods. Malays J Med Sci MJMS. 2000;7:10–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mortalité en 2016 - Tableaux de séries longues − La situation démographique en 2016 | Insee n.d. (Accessed 16 Jun 2020).

  50. Moinzadeh P, Kuhr K, Siegert E, Blank N, Sunderkoetter C, Henes J, et al. Scleroderma renal crisis: risk factors for an increasingly rare organ complication. J Rheumatol. 2019;47(2):241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Simeón-Aznar CP, Fonollosa-Plá V, Tolosa-Vilella C, Espinosa-Garriga G, Campillo-Grau M, Ramos-Casals M, et al. Registry of the Spanish Network for Systemic Sclerosis: survival, prognostic factors, and causes of death. Medicine. 2015;94:e1728.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Poudel DR, Jayakumar D, Danve A, Sehra ST, Derk CT. Determinants of mortality in systemic sclerosis: a focused review. Rheumatol Int. 2017.

  53. Li X, Qian Y-Q, Liu N, Mu R, Zuo Y, Wang G-C, et al. Survival rate, causes of death, and risk factors in systemic sclerosis: a large cohort study. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37:3051–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ewert R, Ittermann T, Habedank D, Held M, Lange TJ, Halank M, et al. Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with systemic sclerosis. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19:230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Goh NS, Hoyles RK, Denton CP, Hansell DM, Renzoni EA, Maher TM, et al. Short-term pulmonary function trends are predictive of mortality in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:1670–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Volkmann ER, Tashkin DP, Sim M, Li N, Goldmuntz E, Keyes-Elstein L, et al. Short-term progression of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis predicts long-term survival in two independent clinical trial cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:122–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hsu VM, Chung L, Hummers LK, Shah A, Simms R, Bolster M, et al. Risk factors for mortality and cardiopulmonary hospitalization in systemic sclerosis patients at risk for pulmonary hypertension, in the PHAROS registry. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:176–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chung L, Domsic RT, Lingala B, Alkassab F, Bolster M, Csuka ME, et al. Survival and predictors of mortality in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: outcomes from the pulmonary hypertension assessment and recognition of outcomes in scleroderma registry. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66:489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lefèvre G, Dauchet L, Hachulla E, Montani D, Sobanski V, Lambert M, et al. Survival and prognostic factors in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:2412–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Fransen J, Popa-Diaconu D, Hesselstrand R, Carreira P, Valentini G, Beretta L, et al. Clinical prediction of 5-year survival in systemic sclerosis: validation of a simple prognostic model in EUSTAR centres. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1788–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Panopoulos S, Bournia V-K, Konstantonis G, Fragiadaki K, Sfikakis PP, Tektonidou MG. Predictors of morbidity and mortality in early systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up data from a single-centre inception cohort. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17:816–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Freire M, Rivera A, Sopeña B, Tolosa Vilella C, Guillén-Del Castillo A, Colunga Argüelles D, et al. Clinical and epidemiological differences between men and women with systemic sclerosis: a study in a Spanish systemic sclerosis cohort and literature review. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(Suppl 106):89–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Elhai M, Avouac J, Walker UA, Matucci-Cerinic M, Riemekasten G, Airò P, et al. A gender gap in primary and secondary heart dysfunctions in systemic sclerosis: a EUSTAR prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:163–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ferdowsi N, Huq M, Stevens W, Hudson M, Wang M, Tay T, et al. Development and validation of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Damage Index (SCTC-DI): a novel instrument to quantify organ damage in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:807–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank FAI2R, la filière de santé des maladies auto-immunes et autoinflammatoires rares.


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SDAC and Grégory P designed the study, performed the analyses (with Mickael M), analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. DA, Laurent A, Leonardo A, OL, Martin M, Grégoire P, DR, TP, LS, FG, and GP contributed to the patient recruitment, informed consent, and data collection and have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien De Almeida Chaves.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Patient has provided informed consent for publication of the case. The data were collected in the Systemic Scleroderma Toulouse Cohort (SSTC) as part of routine clinical care in accordance to Good Clinical Practice and complied with the requirements of the Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté (CNIL) (registration No. 914607). In compliance with French regulation relating to clinical non-interventional research, this study does not require ethics committee approval.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix.

Prognosis factors: COX univariate analysis in the Systemic Scleroderma Toulouse Cohort

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Almeida Chaves, S., Porel, T., Mounié, M. et al. Sine scleroderma, limited cutaneous, and diffused cutaneous systemic sclerosis survival and predictors of mortality. Arthritis Res Ther 23, 295 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Systemic sclerosis
  • Mortality
  • Prognostic factors