Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Targeting of vascular adhesion protein-1 by positron emission tomography visualizes sites of inflammation in Borrelia burgdorferi-infected mice

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 19, Article number: 254 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In the present study, we sought to evaluate the feasibility of targeting vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) by positron emission tomography (PET) for the longitudinal quantitative assessment of Borrelia burgdorferi infection-induced inflammation in mice.

Methods

Mice with B. burgdorferi infection-induced arthritis were studied. During a 7-week follow-up period, the progression of arthritis was monitored weekly with 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET/computed tomography (CT) and measurement of tibiotarsal joint swellings. A subgroup of infected mice was treated with ceftriaxone. Finally, histopathological assessment of joint inflammation was performed and VAP-1 expression in joints were determined.

Results

Explicit joint swelling and 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 uptake could be demonstrated in the affected joints from B. burgdorferi-infected mice. By contrast, no obvious accumulation of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 was detected in joints of uninfected mice. The maximum swelling and highest uptake in the affected joints were observed 4 weeks after the infection. 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 uptake in joints correlated with joint swelling (P < 0.0001) and histopathological scoring of inflammation (P = 0.020). Despite short-term antibiotic treatment, the arthritis persisted, and the PET signal remained as high as in nontreated mice. Immunohistochemistry revealed strong-to-moderate expression of VAP-1 in the synovium of B. burgdorferi-infected mice, while only weak expression of VAP-1 was detected in uninfected mice.

Conclusions

The present study showed that 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 can detect B. burgdorferi infection-induced arthritis in mice. Furthermore, longitudinal PET/CT imaging allowed monitoring of arthritis development over time.

Background

Lyme borreliosis (LB) is a human tick-borne infection caused by the spirochete of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (B. burgdorferi) [1]. Localized infection at the tick bite site, the so-called erythema migrans skin lesion, is the most common manifestation of LB. From the inoculation site in the skin, dissemination of bacteria throughout the body occurs via the blood circulation. In the early-disseminated stage of infection, manifestations can occur in the nervous system and heart. Late LB usually manifests as a chronic skin infection called acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans or as Lyme arthritis (LA), the B. burgdorferi infection of joints [2, 3]. Antibiotic treatment eradicates the bacteria and cures the infection in most patients, but some patients have symptoms that persist after the antibiotic treatment [4]. Currently, no in vivo imaging techniques allow the specific visualization of B. burgdorferi infection in humans.

C3H mice are widely used as an animal model to study the dissemination and treatment response of Borrelia infection. B. burgdorferi-infected C3H mice develop joint symptoms resembling those of human disease, including joint swelling, synovial hypertrophy and hyperplasia, and leukocyte infiltration [5]. Although there are a few in vivo imaging techniques that can be used to monitor B. burgdorferi infection in mice, these techniques have some disadvantages. Fluorescence- or bioluminescence-based imaging techniques may visualize the infection at the level of the whole animal or even at a particular tissue, but they require genetically engineered B. burgdorferi that express green fluorescent protein or luciferase [6,7,8,9]. Offering an alternative to current in vivo imaging techniques, positron emission tomography (PET) allows longitudinal imaging of individual mice at several time points. This presents the opportunity to visualize and quantify the status of specific organs; monitor the dissemination of an infection; and use wild-type and unlabeled bacteria, which is especially important.

The gold standard for PET imaging of infectious and inflammatory diseases is the 18F-labeled glucose analog fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). The accumulation of 18F-FDG is dependent on the glycolytic activity of inflammatory cells because these cells use glucose as an energy source during activity. In addition, increased glucose accumulation in inflamed tissues occurs in relation to the high numbers of glucose transporters on the cell membranes of inflammatory cells [10]. However, 18F-FDG is not an inflammation-specific tracer, because it accumulates in any cells that use glucose as an energy source. Over the years, attempts have been made to develop more specific radiopharmaceuticals for imaging of inflammation and infection, but these have generally met with little success [11,12,13].

Leukocyte migration from the blood to tissue is a crucial step in acute and chronic inflammation. Vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) is an endothelial cell molecule that participates in leukocyte recruitment in inflamed tissue. Under normal conditions, VAP-1 is stored in intracellular storage granules in endothelial cells, but upon inflammation, it is rapidly translocated from the intracellular storage granules to the endothelial cell surface [14]. However, though VAP-1 has an important role during early inflammation, its expression on the endothelial surface remains constant for a longer time if inflammation continues. Besides being an adhesion molecule, VAP-1 (currently also known as amine oxidase, copper containing 3, or AOC3) has enzymatic activity. The end products of the VAP-1-catalyzed enzymatic reaction are inflammation mediators [15]. Therefore, this makes VAP-1 a potential target for anti-inflammatory therapy and in vivo imaging of inflammation. We have published several articles concerning VAP-1 as a target for in vivo imaging in different experimental animal models [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Although leukocytes can bind to the endothelium in a VAP-1-dependent manner, counterreceptors of VAP-1 were for a long time unknown. A few years ago, it was discovered that the sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs) 9 and 10 are leukocyte ligands of VAP-1 [22, 23]. Previously, we demonstrated that VAP-1-targeted gallium-68-labeled Siglec-9 motif containing peptide (68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9) can be used for PET imaging of inflammation and cancer [22, 24, 25].

Expression levels of the adhesion molecules P-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 are elevated in the synovia of B. burgdorferi-infected mice [26, 27]. A marked similarity is noted in the expression of these adhesion molecules between human LA and the mouse model of LA. In addition, VAP-1 is highly expressed in the synovia of patients with treatment-resistant LA, suggesting that a VAP-1-targeting tracer such as 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 could be useful in the imaging of LA [28].

The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate the feasibility of VAP-1-targeting 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 for the longitudinal quantitative monitoring of B. burgdorferi infection-induced joint inflammation in mice and (2) to compare the results obtained using this tracer with the traditional indicators of arthritis in mice, including joint swelling and histological scoring of joint inflammation. Furthermore, we assessed whether the tracer could detect ceftriaxone treatment-induced changes in inflammation.

Methods

B. burgdorferi strains

A wild-type B. burgdorferi sensu stricto N40 strain, which was provided by Sven Bergström, University of Umeå, Sweden, was used to infect mice. The spirochetes were cultivated in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly II (BSK II) medium at 33 °C.

Animal model and experimental design

All animal experiments were approved by the national animal experiment board in Finland and the Regional State Administrative Agency for Southern Finland, and they were conducted in accordance with the European Union directive. To induce LB in mice, 22 four-week-old female C3H/HeNhsd mice (Envigo, Horst, The Netherlands) were infected with 106 bacteria in 100 μl of PBS via an intracutaneous injection into the lower back. Four C3H/HeNhsd mice were given injections with 100 μl of PBS into the lower back to act as uninfected controls. Eight of the B. burgdorferi-infected mice were treated with ceftriaxone (Rocephalin®; Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) starting at 4 weeks after infection. A dose of 25 mg/kg ceftriaxone was subcutaneously administered twice daily for 5 days. The swelling of hind tibiotarsal joints (mediolateral diameter) was monitored weekly using a metric caliper. The measurer was blinded to the identity of the groups.

Six mice (two B. burgdorferi-infected, two uninfected controls, and two ceftriaxone-treated infected mice) were imaged with PET/computed tomography (CT) each week, starting at 4 days postinfection. After the last PET/CT imaging at week 7, the mice were killed, and tissues were collected for ex vivo gamma counting, histology, and anti-VAP-1 immunohistochemistry. In addition, starting at week 2, two B. burgdorferi-infected and/or two ceftriaxone-treated infected mice were killed after longitudinal PET/CT imaging each week for ex vivo gamma counting of tracer uptake in several excised organs. After gamma counting, ear, heart, hind tibiotarsal joint, and urinary bladder samples were subjected to Borrelia culture, and one tibiotarsal joint sample was collected for histological analysis.

B. burgdorferi culturing of tissue samples

Ear, heart, tibiotarsal joint, and urinary bladder samples were collected to assess the B. burgdorferi infection status. All instruments were disinfected in ethanol between dissections of different samples. The tissue samples were cultured in BSK II medium supplemented with phosphomycin (50 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and rifampicin (100 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) at 33 °C for 6 weeks. Growth was monitored every 2 weeks with a dark-field microscope.

Histology and scoring

One tibiotarsal joint of each mouse was formalin-fixed, demineralized, paraffin-embedded, and cut into 5-μm sections for hematoxylin and eosin staining. Joint inflammation was analyzed by an experienced pathologist blinded to the infection status of the mice. Synovial proliferation, chronic inflammation, and active inflammation were scored on a scale from 0 to 6. The diameters of joints were also measured.

Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, decalcified joints were stained with a monoclonal TK10-79 antibody recognizing mouse VAP-1 or a negative class-matched control antibody (both 1 μg/ml). Antigen retrieval with 0.01 M citric acid (pH 6.0) and removal of endogenous peroxidase with 1% H2O2 were performed. The primary antibody was detected with a VECTASTAIN Elite ABC rat immunoglobulin G kit (PK-6104; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated avidin. Diaminobenzidine (K3468; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) was used as a chromogen. The samples were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Radiochemistry

A cyclic peptide, CARLSLSWRGLTLCPSK, with disulfide-bridged cysteines consisting of residues 283–297 from the Siglec-9 and 8-amino-3,6-diooxaoctanoyl linker (polyethylene glycol derivative) between DOTA chelator and peptide (Peptide Specialty Laboratories GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was labeled with 68Ga as previously described [18, 22]. The radiochemical purity of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 was ≥ 95% throughout the study, as determined by reversed-phase radio-HPLC.

PET/CT studies

Mice were fasted for 4 h with ad libitum access to water before PET/CT imaging. The mice were anesthetized with isoflurane; the tail vein was cannulated; and the urinary bladder was catheterized. The urinary bladder catheter was removed a few minutes before CT imaging. CT was performed for anatomical reference and attenuation correction. The mice were then subjected to intravenous injection with 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 (9.9 ± 1.1 MBq) via the tail vein. Dynamic PET imaging was then performed for 30 minutes (Inveon Multimodality PET/CT System; Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA) starting from the time of injection. The PET data were acquired in a list mode and iteratively reconstructed with an ordered subset expectation maximization 3D algorithm, followed by maximum a posteriori reconstruction.

With CT used as the anatomical reference, quantitative PET analysis was performed by defining ROIs in hind tibiotarsal joints and other main organs using Inveon Research Workplace 4.1 software (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, USA). Two hind tibiotarsal joints from each mouse were analyzed individually at different time points. The uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 was reported as the standardized uptake value (SUV), which was calculated as the average radioactivity concentration of the ROI corrected for the injected radioactivity dose and animal weight.

Immediately after the last 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET/CT imaging, the mice were killed, and various tissues were excised and weighted. The radioactivity concentration of the tissues was measured with a gamma counter (Triathler3″; Hidex, Turku, Finland). The ex vivo radioactivity measurements were corrected for radionuclide decay from the time of injection and the weight of tissue and animal, and the results were expressed as percentage of injected radioactivity dose per gram of tissue.

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± SD. The normal distribution of the data was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Student’s t test was used for normally distributed data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for all other experiments. Comparisons between multiple groups were made using one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s correction. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for the association between two continuous variables. Nonparametric Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze associations between in vivo radioactivity and histological data. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Characterization of B. burgdorferi-induced arthritis in mice

The diameters of the tibiotarsal joints of all mice were measured at various time points throughout the experiment. The B. burgdorferi-infected mice developed visually explicit tibiotarsal joint swelling and redness. The maximum swelling was reached 4 weeks after the infection, with the swelling starting to decline after this point (Fig. 1a). The joint diameters of uninfected mice remained the same throughout the follow-up period.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Borrelia burgdorferi causes severe arthritis. a Development of hind tibiotarsal joint swelling was monitored once a week by measuring the mediolateral diameter of the joint. The results from B. burgdorferi-infected mice are compared with those from uninfected mice. Values are mean ± SD; number of analyzed joints: infected (n = 8–28), uninfected (n = 8). *P < 0.05. b Representative images of tibiotarsal joints from a B. burgdorferi-infected (upper left) and an uninfected control (upper right). Lower insets show the indicated areas of infected mouse at higher magnification. Severe arthritis is seen in the infected mouse, with synovial proliferation (arrow in lower left image) and infiltration of inflammatory cells (asterisk in lower right image). Hematoxylin and eosin staining of paraffin-embedded 5-μm synovial tissue sections at × 50 and × 100 original magnification

Full size image

All ear, heart, tibiotarsal joint, and urinary bladder samples of infected mice were B. burgdorferi culture-positive. These results verified that all infected mice had developed a disseminated B. burgdorferi infection. Tissue samples from uninfected control mice were culture-negative.

The histological findings from joints of infected mice revealed thickening of the synovial membrane, proliferation of synovial lining cells, and chronic inflammation that contained mainly lymphocytes (Fig. 1b). The scores of the tibiotarsal joints of infected mice reached a maximum at 5 weeks postinfection. Furthermore, synovial proliferation and chronic inflammation were also visible at the last time point (i.e., 7 weeks after infection). The tibiotarsal joints of uninfected mice were all scored as zero at week 7.

Monitoring B. burgdorferi infection-induced inflammation in mice with longitudinal 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET/CT

68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET/CT was able to visualize B. burgdorferi-induced inflammation in the joints of infected mice, whereas uninfected mice showed only low accumulations of the tracer (Fig. 2a). Longitudinal assessment of the mice revealed that, in comparison with uninfected mice, the tracer signal in tibiotarsal joints of infected mice had already started to increase 1 week after the induction of infection. The highest tracer uptake was observed at 4 weeks postinfection (Fig. 2b). During the 3–5 weeks after the infection, the difference in uptake between the infected and uninfected mice was statistically significant (week 3 SUV, 0.50 ± 0.072 vs. 0.26 ± 0.063, P = 0.0040; week 4 SUV, 0.68 ± 0.17 vs. 0.36 ± 0.065, P = 0.0037; week 5 SUV, 0.49 ± 0.092 vs. 0.28 ± 0.063, P = 0.0067). The tracer uptake in the joints of infected mice peaked at week 4 and then started to decrease, but it remained higher than that in uninfected mice throughout the 7-week follow-up period (week 7 SUV, 0.36 ± 0.022 vs. 0.28 ± 0.034, P = 0.014). We did not see any differences in uptake in other organs, such as heart or brain, between the infected and uninfected mice (data not shown). In all studied mice, the excess of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 was eliminated rapidly via kidneys to the urinary bladder, which is in line with results of our previous studies [22, 24, 29].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Uptake of gallium-68-labeled Siglec-9 motif containing peptide (68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9) in mouse tibiotarsal joints. a Representative 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 positron emission tomographic/computed tomographic images of an uninfected mouse and a Borrelia burgdorferi-infected mouse at weeks 3 and 4. b Quantification of in vivo tracer uptake in tibiotarsal joints of the infected and uninfected mice. Number of analyzed joints: infected (n = 4–8), uninfected (n = 4). *P < 0.05. SUV Standardized uptake value

Full size image

The ex vivo gamma counting measurements of the excised tissue samples performed 30 minutes after tracer injection verified the in vivo PET/CT imaging results. Detailed results of the 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 distribution in the tibiotarsal joints are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 uptake in mouse tibiotarsal joints detected using ex vivo gamma counting
Full size table

Effect of ceftriaxone treatment at week 4 on joint inflammation

During the fourth week postinjection, a subset of B. burgdorferi-infected mice was treated with ceftriaxone twice daily for 5 days. Whereas B. burgdorferi were detected by culture from the ear, heart, tibiotarsal joint, and urinary bladder samples of untreated infected mice, samples of ceftriaxone-treated mice were culture-negative. The joint diameter of the ceftriaxone-treated mice started to decline simultaneously with the initiation of treatment, but the difference between the ceftriaxone-treated and uninfected mice remained statistically significant over the whole follow-up period (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, the differences in joint diameter between the ceftriaxone-treated and untreated infected mice were significant at weeks 4 and 5, but not after week 5, when the decline in both sets of mice was similar.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Evaluation of the tibiotarsal joints of ceftriaxone-treated mice. a Tibiotarsal joint swelling in the ceftriaxone-treated mice compared with the untreated infected and uninfected mice. Number of analyzed joints: untreated infected (n = 8–20), uninfected (n = 8), and ceftriaxone-treated (n = 8–16). b In vivo uptake values of Gallium-68-labeled Siglec-9 motif containing peptide (68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9) in the ceftriaxone-treated mice compared with the untreated infected and uninfected mice. Number of analyzed joints: untreated infected (n = 4–8), uninfected (n = 4), and ceftriaxone-treated (n = 4–8). *P < 0.05 for ceftriaxone-treated vs. uninfected, # P < 0.05 for ceftriaxone-treated vs. infected. SUV Standardized uptake value

Full size image

The 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 uptake in tibiotarsal joints of the ceftriaxone-treated mice was in line with the swelling results. According to the in vivo PET imaging, the uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 in tibiotarsal joints at weeks 4 and 5 was significantly higher in the ceftriaxone-treated mice than in the uninfected mice (Fig. 3b). The tracer uptake in tibiotarsal joints of the ceftriaxone-treated mice did not differ from that of the untreated infected mice. The 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 uptake in the ceftriaxone-treated mice started to decline during the last weeks of the follow-up period (as was the case in the untreated infected mice), and it reached almost the same level as in the uninfected mice. The ex vivo results from tibiotarsal joints showed that the uptake was significantly higher in the ceftriaxone-treated mice than in the uninfected mice at week 5 (P = 0.0085) (Table 1). The uptake in tibiotarsal joints was also higher at week 6, although the difference did not quite reach statistical significance (P = 0.055).

Histopathological evaluation correlates with in vivo 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET

To determine whether the uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 in the tibiotarsal joints correlated with histopathological changes in arthritis associated with B. burgdorferi infection, we performed correlation analyses between the individual in vivo PET results and swelling and histological scoring data. The individual 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 uptake of the tibiotarsal joints correlated significantly with the joint diameters (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, the individual results of the histological scoring also showed a positive correlation with the in vivo PET results (r = 0.61, P = 0.020) (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlations between joint swelling, histopathological changes, and positron emission tomography tracer uptake in mouse joints. Accumulation of gallium-68-labeled Siglec-9 motif containing peptide (68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9) in the tibiotarsal joints in comparison with the joint diameter (a) and histology scores (b). Number of analyzed joints: infected (n = 24), uninfected (n = 4). Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients and P values are presented. SUV Standardized uptake value

Full size image

Expression of VAP-1 in mouse synovial tissue

To verify the expression of the tracer target in synovial tissue samples, longitudinal sections of tibiotarsal joints from infected, uninfected, and ceftriaxone-treated mice were immunostained for VAP-1. Moderate expression of VAP-1 in the synovial tissue vessels was detected in the samples from infected mice at 2 weeks postinfection (Fig. 5a). The strongest positive VAP-1 staining in synovial tissue was observed at 4 weeks postinfection (Fig. 5b), which was in line with the joint swelling and in vivo 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec uptake. The weak expression of VAP-1 in the synovial tissue vessels was observed at 7 weeks postinfection (Fig. 5c). Only occasional VAP-1-positive vessels were detected in the synovial tissue of the uninfected mice (Fig. 5d). After ceftriaxone treatment, the synovium showed moderate expression of VAP-1 (Fig. 5e). Thus, VAP-1 expression was evident in the synovial tissue of affected tibiotarsal joints.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression of vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) in synovial tissue samples of mouse tibiotarsal joints. Representative VAP-1 immunohistochemical staining shows moderate staining of blood vessels at 2 weeks postinfection (a), more prominent staining at 4 weeks postinfection (b), and weak staining at 7 weeks postinfection (c). In the samples from the uninfected mice, only occasional VAP-1-positive blood vessels were observed (d). Immediately after the ceftriaxone treatment, expression of VAP-1 did not decline, but stayed at a moderate level (e). Arrows indicate VAP-1-positive blood vessels. Scale bar = 50 μm

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, we focused on longitudinal quantitative PET/CT imaging with the VAP-1-targeting tracer 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 to assess B. burgdorferi infection-induced inflammation in mice, with particular emphasis on the arthritic joints. This Siglec-9-derived cyclic peptide binds to VAP-1 [22]. Our results revealed that 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET detected inflamed joints at an early stage and was able to monitor the fluctuating nature of B. burgdorferi-induced arthritis. By contrast, no obvious accumulation of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 was detected in the joints of uninfected mice. These findings were confirmed by the results of the ex vivo analyses, histological evaluations, immunohistochemical VAP-1 staining, and joint swelling measurements. Moreover, we showed that 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET/CT imaging is also a suitable tool for the monitoring of treatment responses in mouse models of LB. Importantly, our results suggest that VAP-1-targeting PET has potential as a tool for imaging human patients with LA.

Mice are natural hosts for B. burgdorferi spirochetes and normally show no physiological signs of infection [1]. To study LB in vivo, mouse strains susceptible to infection by B. burgdorferi have been developed. The most commonly used mouse strain is C3H, which develops visually explicit joint symptoms with swelling and leukocyte infiltration [5]. In the mouse model of LB, the animals are usually infected with B. burgdorferi using 104 to 107 bacteria, which in most cases leads to prominent joint manifestations [5, 8, 30, 31]. In this study, C3H/HeNhsd mice were infected with 106 bacteria because we wanted to ensure that the mice developed a disseminated infection with clear joint swelling. No other infectious doses were therefore evaluated.

In the present study, the peaks in 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 uptake and joint swelling occurred at 4 weeks postinfection, with the uptake and inflammation then resolving over the next few weeks. It should be noted that the joint swelling of B. burgdorferi-infected mice rose sligthly at 7 weeks postinfection, which is in line with the results of our previous study [32]. Others have also reported that joint swelling and inflammation in mice peak 3–4 weeks postinfection [30, 32]. However, diameter measurements of tibiotarsal joints provide only limited information on the biological processes occurring in the joint. Conversely, molecular PET/CT imaging is a sensitive method and provides quantitative information on ongoing inflammatory processes and the status of the infection. In contrast to histopathological evaluation, the limited spatial resolution of PET/CT imaging cannot pinpoint the exact tissue and cellular level of the inflammatory process, but its high sensitivity enables the detection of inflammation at a very early stage.

The development of novel, noninvasive molecular imaging tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of infectious and inflammatory diseases is important. Clinically approved radiopharmaceuticals for the detection of infection are based on the influx of leukocytes during inflammation. The most commonly used PET tracer, the glucose analog 18F-FDG, has been used successfully in the detection of benign and malignant tumors as well as inflammatory and infectious conditions [33]. There are a few studies describing the use of 18F-FDG PET in brain manifestations of patients with LB infection [34,35,36,37], but whether the method is useful in diagnosing LB remains to be determined. Recently, we showed that 18F-FDG can be used to study B. burgdorferi infection-induced arthritis in mice [38]. Generally, 18F-FDG tends to give false-positive results, and the physiological uptake may mask the detection of inflammatory foci close to tissues that have high glucose metabolic activity. 67/68Ga-citrate was one of the earliest radiotracers to be made available for the imaging of infection, but the mechanism of accumulation at the site of infection is not entirely understood [39]. Autologous white blood cells labeled with long-lived radionuclides enable the detection of infectious processes or inflammatory foci [40] and are currently considered to be a leading imaging technique for targeting infection. Another interesting group of infection-selective radiotracers is the labeled siderophores, which have shown promising results for the imaging of infection caused by Aspergillus fumigatus [41]. Previous studies on imaging of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections have also identified potential radiopharmaceuticals that may replace 18F-FDG in the future [42, 43]. Nevertheless, investigations on infection- and inflammation-selective radiopharmaceuticals are still in their infancy, and novel approaches need to be evaluated in different model systems.

Many radiopharmaceuticals have been investigated for the imaging of arthritic synovitis. The most promising results for the imaging of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been shown for stroma-targeting tracers, including methyl-11C-choline for targeting cell proliferation [44] and 11C-(R)-PK11195 for targeting 18 kDa translocator protein on activated macrophages [45]. In addition, several PET tracers have been explored for the imaging of RA in animal models, but their applicability to human RA has not been confirmed in human studies [46]. In the present study, we have shown that in vivo joint uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 correlated well with histopathological scoring and joint diameter. These significant correlations with both parameters demonstrate that PET/CT is a suitable method for the in vivo imaging of infection-induced arthritis in mice. In addition, we can speculate that 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET would be helpful for diagnosing LA in humans because VAP-1 is expressed in the synovium of patients with treatment-resistant LA [28].

The currently available techniques for studying LB, such as bioluminescence imaging, require animals to be killed at different time points for analyses of specific organs; this in turn increases the number of study animals required. PET imaging allows the same animal to be studied at multiple time points during the progression of disease and/or during therapy, which significantly reduces the number of animals required for a study. Furthermore, longitudinal intra-animal analyses can increase the statistical power of studies because, for example, both hind tibiotarsal joints can be analyzed simultaneously at different time points without variation due to the dissection of different animals. In vivo imaging may also improve the reliability of drug intervention studies because each animal or patient can be used as its own control by studying the subject before and after treatment.

Antibiotic treatments given in early LB usually eradicate the spirochetes and prevent late-stage manifestations in human patients. Ceftriaxone is the preferred drug for disseminated LB, and it is also effective in LA [1]. Oral or intravenous antibiotic treatment works well in patients with LA, and in most cases arthritis is healing. Previous studies using a mouse model of B. burgdorferi infection-induced arthritis indicated that ceftriaxone treatment eliminates live spirochetes and decreases joint swelling [31, 47]. However, the correct timing of treatment is essential if it is to have an effect on joint manifestations. When started at an early stage of infection (at 2 weeks), ceftriaxone treatment prevents the development of joint swelling [32]. During the later stages of infection, the timing of the treatment becomes a crucial factor with respect to its specific effects on joint manifestations. This is due to the fluctuating nature of B. burgdorferi infection-induced joint inflammation in mice. The joint swelling usually peaks a few weeks after the infection, with the inflammation then starting to spontaneously recover with normalization of the joint diameter. In the present study, we were unable to investigate the effect of ceftriaxone treatment with regard to joint inflammation. The treatment was initiated at 4 weeks postinfection, the time when a spontaneous decrease in joint swelling occurred in the untreated mice. However, a small increase in the in vivo uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 in ceftriaxone-treated mice was observed at week 5 in comparison with the untreated mice. This was possibly induced by the debris of the dying spirochetes.

The observed differences of in vivo SUVs between the groups were small but still significant. This is based on the fact that PET can detect early biological changes with very high sensitivity [48]. In the present study, the performance PET/CT imaging in visualizing the effect of ceftriaxone treatment on mouse LA could not be investigated, owing to the timing of the treatment. Thus, the feasibility of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET/CT for detecting therapy response remains to be further investigated, such as with an early-stage treatment. Taken together, our findings support the concept of using VAP-1-targeting tracer for the imaging of synovial inflammation in LA, but further head-to-head studies are needed to confirm the advantages over 18F-FDG PET.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that 68Ga-DOTA-Sigec-9 can accurately detect B. burgdorferi infection-induced arthritis in mice. Longitudinal quantitative PET/CT imaging allows the monitoring of the development of arthritis over time. The present study shows the potential of the VAP-1-targeting imaging concept for identifying synovial inflammation and lays the foundation for further evaluation of the method in human patients with LA.

Abbreviations

AOC3:

Amine oxidase, copper containing 3

BSK II:

Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly II medium

CT:

Computed tomography

18F-FDG:

18F-labeled glucose analog fluorodeoxyglucose

68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9:

Gallium-68-labeled Siglec-9 motif containing peptide

LA:

Lyme arthritis

LB:

Lyme borreliosis

PET:

Positron emission tomography

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Siglec:

Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin

SUV:

Standardized uptake value

VAP-1:

Vascular adhesion protein-1

References

  1. Stanek G, Wormser GP, Gray J, Strle F. Lyme borreliosis. Lancet. 2012;379:461–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coburn J, Medrano M, Cugini C. Borrelia burgdorferi and its tropisms for adhesion molecules in the joint. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:394–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bockenstedt LK, Wormser GP. Review: unraveling Lyme disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:2313–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Arvikar SL, Steere AC. Diagnosis and treatment of Lyme arthritis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:269–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barthold SW, de Souza MS, Janotka JL, Smith AL, Persing DH. Chronic Lyme borreliosis in the laboratory mouse. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:959–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Norman MU, Moriarty TJ, Dresser AR, Millen B, Kubes P, Chaconas G. Molecular mechanisms involved in vascular interactions of the Lyme disease pathogen in a living host. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Moriarty TJ, Norman MU, Colarusso P, Bankhead T, Kubes P, Chaconas G. Real-time high resolution 3D imaging of the Lyme disease spirochete adhering to and escaping from the vasculature of a living host. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000090.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bockenstedt LK, Gonzalez DG, Haberman AM, Belperron AA. Spirochete antigens persist near cartilage after murine Lyme borreliosis therapy. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2652–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hyde JA, Weening EH, Chang M, Trzeciakowski JP, Höök M, Cirillo JD, et al. Bioluminescent imaging of Borrelia burgdorferi in vivo demonstrates that the fibronectin-binding protein BBK32 is required for optimal infectivity. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82:99–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Glaudemans AWJM, de Vries EFJ, Galli F, Dierckx RAJO, Slart RHJA, Signore A. The use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of inflammatory and infectious diseases. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:623036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Signore A, Glaudemans AWJM. The molecular imaging approach to image infections and inflammation by nuclear medicine techniques. Ann Nucl Med. 2011;25:681–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roivainen A, Jalkanen S, Nanni C. Gallium-labelled peptides for imaging of inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39 Suppl 1:S68–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Autio A, Jalkanen S, Roivainen A. Nuclear imaging of inflammation: homing-associated molecules as targets. EJNMMI Res. 2013;3:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Salmi M, Jalkanen S. A 90-kilodalton endothelial cell molecule mediating lymphocyte binding in humans. Science. 1992;257:1407–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Salmi M, Jalkanen S. Cell-surface enzymes in control of leukocyte trafficking. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:760–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaakkola K, Nikula T, Holopainen R, Vähäsilta T, Matikainen MT, Laukkanen ML, et al. In vivo detection of vascular adhesion protein-1 in experimental inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:463–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lankinen P, Mäkinen TJ, Pöyhönen TA, Virsu P, Salomäki S, Hakanen AJ, et al. 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 PET imaging capable of demonstrating the phase of inflammation in healing bones and the progress of infection in osteomyelitic bones. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:352–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ujula T, Salomäki S, Virsu P, Lankinen P, Mäkinen TJ, Autio A, et al. Synthesis, 68Ga labeling and preliminary evaluation of DOTA peptide binding vascular adhesion protein-1: a potential PET imaging agent for diagnosing osteomyelitis. Nucl Med Biol. 2009;36:631–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Autio A, Ujula T, Luoto P, Salomäki S, Jalkanen S, Roivainen A. PET imaging of inflammation and adenocarcinoma xenografts using vascular adhesion protein 1 targeting peptide 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1: comparison with 18F-FDG. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1918–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Autio A, Henttinen T, Sipilä HJ, Jalkanen S, Roivainen A. Mini-PEG spacering of VAP-1-targeting 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 peptide improves PET imaging of inflammation. EJNMMI Res. 2011;1:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Autio A, Vainio PJ, Suilamo S, Mali A, Vainio J, Saanijoki T, et al. Preclinical evaluation of a radioiodinated fully human antibody for in vivo imaging of vascular adhesion protein-1-positive vasculature in inflammation. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1315–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aalto K, Autio A, Kiss EA, Elima K, Nymalm Y, Veres TZ, et al. Siglec-9 is a novel leukocyte ligand for vascular adhesion protein-1 and can be used in PET imaging of inflammation and cancer. Blood. 2011;118:3725–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kivi E, Elima K, Aalto K, Nymalm Y, Auvinen K, Koivunen E, et al. Human Siglec-10 can bind to vascular adhesion protein-1 and serves as its substrate. Blood. 2009;114:5385–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahtinen H, Kulkova J, Lindholm L, Eerola E, Hakanen AJ, Moritz N, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 PET/CT imaging of peri-implant tissue responses and staphylococcal infections. EJNMMI Res. 2014;4:45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Virtanen H, Autio A, Siitonen R, Liljenbäck H, Saanijoki T, Lankinen P, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 – a new imaging tool to detect synovitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Böggemeyer E, Stehle T, Schaible UE, Hahne M, Vestweber D, Simon MM. Borrelia burgdorferi upregulates the adhesion molecules E-selectin, P-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on mouse endothelioma cells in vitro. Cell Adhes Commun. 1994;2:145–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schaible UE, Vestweber D, Butcher EG, Stehle T, Simon MM. Expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules in joints and heart during Borrelia burgdorferi infection of mice. Cell Adhes Commun. 1994;2:465–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akin E, Aversa J, Steere AC. Expression of adhesion molecules in synovia of patients with treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis. Infect Immun. 2001;69:1774–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Retamal J, Sörensen J, Lubberink M, Suarez-Sipmann F, Borges JB, Feinstein R, et al. Feasibility of 68Ga-labeled Siglec-9 peptide for the imaging of acute lung inflammation: a pilot study in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;6:18–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Barthold SW, Persing DH, Armstrong AL, Peeples RA. Kinetics of Borrelia burgdorferi dissemination and evolution of disease after intradermal inoculation of mice. Am J Pathol. 1991;139:263–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hodzic E, Feng S, Holden K, Freet KJ, Barthold SW. Persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi following antibiotic treatment in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1728–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Salo J, Jaatinen A, Söderström M, Viljanen MK, Hytönen J. Decorin binding proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi promote arthritis development and joint specific post-treatment DNA persistence in mice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu C, Li F, Niu G, Chen X. PET imaging of inflammation biomarkers. Theranostics. 2013;3:448–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Newberg A, Hassan A, Alavi A. Cerebral metabolic changes associated with Lyme disease. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:773–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kalina P, Decker A, Kornel E, Halperin JJ. Lyme disease of the brainstem. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:903–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Plotkin M, Hautzel H, Krause BJ, Mohr S, Langen KJ, Müller HW. Fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography studies of acute brainstem Lyme neuroborreliosis. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:927–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Aigelsreiter A, Pump A, Buchhäusl W, Schönfelder M, Beham-Schmid C, Cerroni L, et al. Successful antibiotic treatment of borreliosis associated pseudolymphomatous systemic infiltrates. J Infect. 2005;51:e203–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pietikäinen A, Siitonen R, Liljenbäck H, Eskola O, Söderström M, Roivainen A, et al. In vivo imaging of Lyme arthritis in mice by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Scand J Rheumatol. 2017:1–11. doi:10.1080/03009742.2017.1287306.

  39. Dutta J, Naicker T, Ebenhan T, Kruger HG, Arvidsson PI, Govender T. Synthetic approaches to radiochemical probes for imaging of bacterial infections. Eur J Med Chem. 2017;133:287–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Connolly CM, Donohoe KJ. Nuclear medicine imaging of infection. Semin Roentgenol. 2017;52:114–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Petrik M, Haas H, Dobrozemsky G, Lass-Flörl C, Helbok A, Blatzer M, et al. 68Ga-siderophores for PET imaging of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: proof of principle. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. DeMarco VP, Ordonez AA, Klunk M, Prideaux B, Wang H, Zhuo Z, et al. Determination of [11C]rifampin pharmacokinetics within Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice by using dynamic positron emission tomography bioimaging. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:5768–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Weinstein EA, Liu L, Ordonez AA, Wang H, Hooker JM, Tonge PJ, et al. Noninvasive determination of 2-[18F]-fluoroisonicotinic acid hydrazide pharmacokinetics by positron emission tomography in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:6284–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Roivainen A, Parkkola R, Yli-Kerttula T, Lehikoinen P, Viljanen T, Möttönen T, et al. Use of positron emission tomography with methyl-11C-choline and 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of inflammatory proliferation of synovium. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:3077–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Van Der Laken CJ, Elzinga EH, Kropholler MA, Molthoff CFM, Van Der Heijden JW, Maruyama K, et al. Noninvasive imaging of macrophages in rheumatoid synovitis using 11C-(R)-PK11195 and positron emission tomography. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3350–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Narayan N, Owen DR, Taylor PC. Advances in positron emission tomography for the imaging of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56:1837–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yrjänäinen H, Hytönen J, Song XR, Oksi J, Hartiala K, Viljanen MK. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment activates Borrelia burgdorferi spirochetes 4 weeks after ceftriaxone treatment in C3H/He mice. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:1489–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Phelps ME. PET: the merging of biology and imaging into molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:661–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Aake Honkaniemi for assistance with PET imaging, the Turku Center for Disease Modeling Histology Unit (Erica Nyman and Marja-Riitta Kajaala) and Sari Mäki for performing tissue sectioning and immunohistochemistry, and Timo Kattelus for technical assistance.

Funding

This study was financially supported by grants from the State Research Funding of Turku University Hospital (number 13856); from the Academy of Finland (numbers 258814 and 191701); from the Turku University Hospital, diagnostic and related services, Turku, Finland; from the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation; from the Drug Research Doctoral Programme of the University of Turku Graduate School; and from the Turku Doctoral Program for Molecular Medicine of the University of Turku Graduate School.

Availability of supporting data

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FI-20520, Turku, Finland

    Riikka Siitonen, Heidi Liljenbäck, Meeri Käkelä & Anne Roivainen

  2. Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20520, Turku, Finland

    Annukka Pietikäinen, Sirpa Jalkanen & Jukka Hytönen

  3. Turku Doctoral Programme for Molecular Medicine, Turku, Finland

    Annukka Pietikäinen

  4. Turku Center for Disease Modeling, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20520, Turku, Finland

    Heidi Liljenbäck & Anne Roivainen

  5. Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20520, Turku, Finland

    Mirva Söderström

  6. MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Tykistönkatu 6, FI-20520, Turku, Finland

    Sirpa Jalkanen

  7. Microbiology and Genetics Department, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20520, Turku, Finland

    Jukka Hytönen

  8. Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FI-20520, Turku, Finland

    Anne Roivainen

Authors
  1. Riikka Siitonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annukka Pietikäinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heidi Liljenbäck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Meeri Käkelä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mirva Söderström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sirpa Jalkanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jukka Hytönen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anne Roivainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RS organized the study, performed the animal experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. AP participated in the animal experiments and data analyses. HL contributed to the animal experiments. MK performed the 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 radio syntheses and respective analyses. MS contributed to the histology and interpretation. AR, JH, and SJ designed the study and made critical contributions in the drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Roivainen.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were approved by the national animal experiment board in Finland and the Regional State Administrative Agency for Southern Finland, and they were conducted in accordance with the European Union directive (2010/63/EU).

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

SJ owns stock in Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siitonen, R., Pietikäinen, A., Liljenbäck, H. et al. Targeting of vascular adhesion protein-1 by positron emission tomography visualizes sites of inflammation in Borrelia burgdorferi-infected mice. Arthritis Res Ther 19, 254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1460-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1460-4

Keywords

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us