Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

High serum uric acid level is associated with greater handgrip strength in the aged population

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 2Email author
Arthritis Research & Therapy201921:73

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1858-2

  • Received: 20 September 2018
  • Accepted: 4 March 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

We aimed to investigate the association of serum UA level with muscle strength assessed by handgrip strength (HGS) in a large Korean adult population.

Methods

Cross-sectional data were obtained from the seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2016. The KNHANES 2016 study included 8150 subjects, of whom 4230 subjects were analyzed in this study. The association between serum UA level and HGS was investigated with adjustment for confounding factors.

Results

Serum UA was divided into sex-specific tertiles After adjustment for potential confounding factors, HGS was significantly greater in the high serum UA group (the third tertile) than in the low UA group (the first tertile) in the elderly (age ≥ 60 years) population (coefficient β [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.017 [0.115–1.920]). When the elderly population was subdivided according to the presence of metabolic syndrome (metS), the impact of UA remained significant only in individuals with metS. In the aged population, high serum UA level reduced the risk for low HGS (OR, 95% CI = 0.69, 0.48–0.98, p = 0.041) only in male subjects.

Conclusions

A population-based cross-sectional survey in Korea revealed that high serum UA level is associated with increased HGS in the aged population. The antioxidant property of UA may enhance muscle strength, especially in the elderly population.

Keywords

  • Uric acid
  • Muscle strength
  • Hand strength
  • Antioxidants

Introduction

Uric acid (UA) is produced during the metabolism of the DNA component purine [1]. Uricase, which converts uric acid into soluble allantoin, is lacking in primates, so serum UA level can be maintained relatively high in primates compared to non-primates [2]. UA is known to be important for maintaining high blood pressure for upright walking and is a powerful antioxidant [3, 4]. These functions of UA have led to the concept that uricase was abolished in the evolutionary process that rendered UA essential [5]. However, UA can also exert detrimental effects as a prooxidant that enhances oxidative stress [6] or a danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) that provokes systemic inflammation [7]. Likewise, high levels of UA have been implicated in gout [8], cardiovascular mortality [9, 10], and hypertension [11], while low levels of UA have been reported to increase the risk of Alzheimer’s disease [12] and fracture [13]. The known physiological and pathological roles of UA have been expanding [14].

Sarcopenia is defined by both low muscle mass and low muscle function [15]. Sarcopenia develops in the normal aging process, but also can develop secondary to medical conditions and is associated with gerontologic problems such as pain in osteoarthritis [16] and mortality [17]. Among various risk factors, oxidative stress on the muscle has been suggested to play a critical role in sarcopenia [18], raising the question of how UA (which has both pro- and antioxidant properties) affects sarcopenia.

The vast majority of studies on sarcopenia have been conducted in the elderly population, while studies on the younger population are rare. In the elderly population, most studies have reported the beneficial effects of UA on muscle strength [1922]; nevertheless, the opposite results have also been reported [23]. Two recent studies that included younger subjects had inconsistent results [24, 25], likely due to differences in study design and age range of the subjects.

In Korea, a national survey system called the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) has been performed since 1998. The KNHANES in 2016 included serum UA level for the first time, and muscle strength was measured based on handgrip strength (HGS), although muscle mass could not be evaluated. Using these data, we aimed to investigate the association of serum UA level with muscle strength after adjusting for various confounding factors in a large unbiased nationwide population.

Methods

Study participants

The KNHANES is a nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional health examination and survey that has been conducted every year since 1998 by the Division of Chronic Disease Surveillance of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the Ministry of Health and Welfare to monitor the general health and nutrition status of the non-institutionalized civilian population of South Korea (Ref: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VII) 2016. Seoul, Korea: Division of Chronic Disease Surveillance, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Thus, every year, 8000–10,000 individuals from 4600 households are selected as representative Koreans. This selection is performed through a multi-stage clustered and stratified random sampling method based on national census data. The survey is composed of three individual surveys, namely, a health interview, a nutrition survey, and a health examination survey. The data are collected through household interviews and standardized physical examinations that are conducted at mobile examination centers. The KNHANES database is publicly available at the KNHANES website (http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr, available in Korean). The present study was based on the participants in the first (2016) year of the seventh KNHANES.

The KNHANES VII-1 (2016) examination and health survey was completed by 8150 participants. The following individuals were included in this analysis: those 20 years and above (N = 6315) who were assessed for HGS (N = 5624). Of the 5624 subjects with HGS data, only those whose serum uric acid data were collected were included (N = 5431). The following subjects were excluded: subjects who were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis by a doctor (N = 616), subjects with limitation of physical activity (N = 271), subjects who did not respond to the physical activity survey (N = 195), and subjects with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (N = 119). The remaining 4230 subjects (1999 men and 2231 women) were eligible for this study (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Selection of the study participants

Written informed consent was secured from all participants before the survey began. The study was approved by the ethics committee at Seoul Saint Mary’s Hospital (KC18ZESI0273).

Measurement of HGS

HGS was measured with a digital grip strength dynamometer (TKK 5401 GRIPD; Takei, Japan), which measures forces between 5.0 and 100.0 kg and has an adjustable grip span. The minimum measurement unit is 0.1 kg. During the assessment, participants were asked to stand upright with their feet hip-width apart and to look forward with their elbow fully extended. The dynamometer was held by the testing hand in a neutral, comfortable position (not flexed or extended) with 90° flexion at the index finger. Participants were instructed to squeeze the grip continuously with full force for at least 3 s. They were asked not to swing the grip dynamometer during the test and not to hold their breath. The time between each trial was approximately 60 s. Each hand was tested three times, and the highest reading from the dominant hand was used as maximum grip strength, expressed in kilograms [26]. Low HGS was defined as < 26 kg for men and < 18 kg for women [27].

Measurement of serum UA

Blood samples were drawn from the antecubital vein in the morning after an overnight fast. Serum UA level was measured by a colorimetric enzymatic method on a Hitachi 7600-210 automatic biochemical analyzer (Hitachi, Japan). UA levels were then divided into sex-specific tertiles based on their distribution: ≤ 5.2, 5.3–6.2, and ≥ 6.3 mg/dL in men and ≤ 3.9, 4.0–4.6, and ≥ 4.7 mg/dL in women. Hyperuricemia was defined as a serum UA level of ≥ 7.0 mg/dL for men and ≥ 6.0 mg/dL for women [28, 29].

Study variables

Age, weight, height, smoking, alcohol drinking, household income, and physical activity were recorded. Weight and height were collected according to standardized procedures, and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. In terms of smoking status, participants were categorized as current smokers or non-smokers. Individuals were deemed as non-drinkers if they had not consumed any alcoholic drinks in the previous year. Household income was categorized in quartiles.

The IPAQ-SF is used to estimate the overall physical activity level of an individual in metabolic equivalent (MET)-min/week by determining the duration (in minutes) and number of days (in 1 week) of engagement in three specific types of activity (walking, moderate-intensity activity, and high-intensity activity) across a comprehensive set of domains (leisure time, work-related, transport-related physical activity and domestic and gardening activity) in the past 7 days [30]. The MET is a unit used to estimate the amount of oxygen used by the body during physical activity. Subjects were classified into three PA levels (low, moderate, or high) based on the cutoff total MET-min/week in each category (IPAQ Research Committee. International physical activity questionnaire. https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol. Accessed 30 July 2016). Resistance exercise (press-up, sit-up, dumbbell, barbell, and horizontal bar exercise) was recorded according to the number of days it was performed in 1 week.

Protein intake was assessed with a 24-h dietary recall questionnaire administered by a trained dietitian. The results were generated with the food composition table developed by the National Rural Resources Development Institute (Rural Development Administration (2006) Food composition table, 7th edn. National Rural Resources Development Institute, Suwon). Inadequate protein intake was defined as protein intake under the recommended dietary reference intake for Koreans in 2015 according to the Korean Nutrition Society.

Subjects were considered to have hypertension if they had a systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or greater, a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or greater, or if they were being treated for hypertension. A subject was deemed to have diabetes if he or she had a fasting blood glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL that was first detected in this survey, used an antidiabetic medication, or was previously diagnosed with diabetes by a doctor. A history of CVD was defined as a previous stroke, angina, or myocardial infarction. We used the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III criteria to determine whether metS was present; the cutoffs for the Asia–Pacific region were employed [31]. metS was considered to be present if three or more of the following conditions were present: (i) systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive drug treatment, (ii) fasting serum triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL, (iii) low HDL-C (< 40 mg/dL in men and 50 mg/dL in women), (iv) waist circumference ≥ 90 cm in men and ≥ 80 cm in women, and/or (v) fasting serum glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL or use of antidiabetic medication. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation [32].

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are expressed as mean (SD), and categorical data as percentages. The first analyses explored differences in participant characteristics across the sex-specific tertiles of UA level. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and ANOVA was used for continuous variables.

The association between serum uric acid level and HGS was assessed through three multiple linear regression models with progressive levels of adjustment. In each of these models, the main independent variable was serum UA level (categorized into sex-specific tertiles), and the dependent variable was HGS. Model 1 was adjusted for sex and age, model 2 was additionally adjusted for BMI and income, and model 3 was additionally adjusted for current smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, resistance exercise, total protein intake, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and CVD. The differential association by age group was evaluated through the inclusion of an interaction term between the UA tertiles and three pre-defined age groups (20–39, 40–59, ≥ 60) in all three models; also, the final analyses were stratified by age.

A multivariable logistic regression model was used (the enter method) to determine whether serum uric acid level was independently associated with low HGS. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed in PASW statistics 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Characteristics of the subjects according to serum uric acid level stratified by age

In total, 4230 individuals (1999 male and 2231 female) were analyzed. The mean ± SD serum UA level was 5.78 ± 1.29 mg/dL in men and 4.3 ± 0.92 mg/dL in women. The sex-specific UA tertiles were ≤ 5.2 (T1), 5.3–6.2 (T2), and ≥ 6.3 (T3) mg/dL for men and ≤ 3.9 (T1), 4.0–4.6 (T2), and ≥ 4.7 (T3) mg/dL for women. The subjects were stratified by age into young (aged 20–39 years), middle-aged (aged 40–59 years), and elderly (aged ≥ 60 years) groups, which were analyzed separately. As shown in Table 1, the prevalence of obesity and metS was significantly higher in the high UA group in all age groups. Interestingly, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus was significantly lower in the high UA group in the middle-aged and elderly populations. Hypertension was more prevalent in the high UA group (T3) in the young and middle-aged groups. There was no difference in physical activity, resistance exercise, protein intake, or cardiovascular disease prevalence according to UA level. Of note, subjects in the high UA tertile had higher HGS in the young age groups in a crude comparison.
Table 1

Age-stratified characteristics of participants in KNHANES 2016 according to tertiles of serum uric acid levels (N = 4230)

Variable

Age 20–39 (N = 1497)

Age 40–59 (N = 1747)

Age ≥ 60 (N = 986)

N

T1*

T2*

T3*

P

N

T1*

T2*

T3*

P

N

T1*

T2*

T3*

P

% or mean (SD)

% or mean (SD)

% or mean (SD)

Handgrip strength

1497

32.0 (10.5)

34.2 (10.5)

35.2 (11.3)

< 0.01

1747

33.5 (10.1)

34.0 (10.3)

34.3 (10.9)

0.38

986

30.6 (9.6)

29.9 (8.9)

29.6 (9.9)

0.35

Male

650

34.9

45.9

47.4

< 0.01

796

43.7

45.7

47.6

0.17

553

63.0

53.8

48.2

< 0.01

Income

    

0.65

    

0.64

    

0.79

 1st quartile

100

7.0

6.6

6.6

 

121

6.5

8.0

6.4

 

325

33.0

32.1

34.2

 

 2nd quartile

366

24.0

25.1

24.3

 

366

20.3

1837

23.9

 

292

30.6

27.8

30.5

 

 3rd quartile

540

36.1

38.0

34.5

 

544

32.9

31.9

28.4

 

201

21.4

22.7

16.5

 

 4th quartile

488

32.9

30.3

40.0

 

715

40.3

41.1

41.3

 

165

15.0

17.4

18.8

 

Current smoker

372

20.5

26.4

37.6

0.04

369

19.1

20.7

23.9

0.04

125

16.0

9.7

10.9

0.03

Alcohol (ever)

1455

96.4

97.7

97.3

0.42

1617

9138

92.4

93.6

0.26

804

80.9

80.9

83.2

0.46

Physical activity (metS-h/week)

1497

1338 (2108)

1576 (2354)

1418 (1750)

0.20

1747

1335 (1974)

1278 (1565)

1284 (1569)

0.82

986

1291 (1771)

1393 (1782)

1222 (1740)

0.50

Low activity

592

44.3

35.8

39.4

0.23

765

44.0

45.7

41.7

0.71

441

43.1

43.5

48.5

0.17

Moderate activity

660

40.5

47.0

44.0

 

747

42.0

41.4

44.9

 

447

47.2

43.8

44.2

 

High activity

245

15.2

17.1

16.5

 

235

14.0

12.9

13.4

 

98

9.7

12.7

7.3

 

Resistance exercise (days for 1 week)

1497

1.6 (1.3)

1.7 (1.5)

1.8 (1.6)

0.05

1747

1.7 (1.5)

1.8 (1.5)

1.8 (1.5)

0.80

986

1.9 (1.7)

1.8 (1.7)

1.9 (1.7)

0.89

Protein intake (g/day)

1497

76 (45)

78 (43)

82 (50)

0.18

1747

71 (34)

73 (39)

74 (38)

0.49

986

60 (42)

61 (29)

60 (30)

0.95

Body mass index (kg/m2)

    

< 0.01

    

< 0.01

    

< 0.01

< 18.5

98

8.8

6.8

4.8

 

43

2.6

3.2

1.6

 

22

3.9

1.0

1.1

 

18.5–24.9

949

71.5

68.3

53.6

 

1079

69.4

61.9

52.8

 

630

66.8

65.2

58.0

 

≥ 25

444

19.7

24.9

41.6

 

625

28.0

34.9

45.6

 

334

29.3

33.8

40.9

 

Hypertension

28

0.2

1.7

3.2

< 0.01

290

15.7

12.7

21.4

0.01

436

44.8

42.8

44.9

0.97

Diabetes

8

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.73

104

9.1

4.9

3.4

< 0.01

180

22.5

16.1

14.2

< 0.01

Cardiovascular disease

1

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.26

30

2.3

1.3

1.4

0.23

84

7.7

8.4

9.9

0.34

Metabolic syndrome

210

7.7

10.4

22.0

< 0.01

530

22.9

26.7

42.4

< 0.01

418

33.7

42.5

55.5

< 0.01

*T1: first tertile (≤ 5.2 mg/dL men; ≤ 3.9 mg/dL women); *T2: second tertile (5.3–6.2 mg/dL men; 4.0–4.6 mg/dL women); *T3: third tertile (≥ 6.3 mg/dL men; ≥ 4.7 mg/dL women). ANOVA was used for continuous variables. The chi-square analysis was used for categorical variables

High uric acid level was associated with increased HGS in the elderly population after adjusting confounders

As shown in Table 1, HGS showed a significant difference according to UA level (tertile) only in young population on crude analysis. However, we observed that the UA level was positively correlated with HGS (Additional file 1: Table S1) in all age groups. When we investigated whether serum UA level was associated with HGS after adjustment for confounding factors using multivariate linear regression analysis, we observed the association of UA and HGS in the elderly population (Table 2). Model 1, which included age and sex as covariates, had similar results to the crude comparison in the young and elderly populations. However, when income (quartiles), BMI (< 18, 18–25, ≥ 25 kg/m2), smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity (MET-h/week), total protein intake (g/day), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and resistance exercise (days/week) were taken into account (model 3), the effect of serum UA was significant only in the elderly group (T3 vs. T1: β coefficient [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.017 [0.115–1.920]). We excluded subjects with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, any cause of limitation of activity and renal insufficiency because these conditions can substantially influence the HGS or uric acid level. However, when we analyzed all the subjects with complete data set (N = 5431), the results were comparable (Additional file 1: Table S2). The results revealed that higher serum UA level was independently associated with higher HGS after adjustment for confounding factors in the elderly population.
Table 2

Multivariate linear regression analysis for handgrip strength according to tertiles of serum uric acid levels (N = 4230)

 

Age 20–39 (N = 1497)

Age 40–59 (N = 1747)

Age ≥ 60 (N = 986)

T1*

T2*

T3*

P

T1*

T2*

T3*

P

T1*

T2*

T3*

P

Beta coefficients (95% CI)

Beta coefficients (95% CI)

Beta coefficients (95% CI)

Model 1

Ref

0.413 (− 0.342, 1.167)

0.994 (0.243, 1.749)

0.010

Ref

0.046 (− 0.574. 0.666)

0.188 (− 0.438, 0.814)

0.555

Ref

0.620 (− 0.197, 1.437)

1.238 (0.378, 2.098)

0.005

Model 2

Ref

0.249 (− 0.481, 0.990)

0.386 (− 0.364, 1.136)

0.312

Ref

− 0.033 (− 0.644, 0.578)

− 0.037 (− 0.661, 0.586)

0.906

Ref

0.463 (− 0.343, 1.269)

0.939 (0.084, 1.793)

0.031

Model 3

Ref

0.146 (− 0.641, 0.934)

0.093 (− 0.706, 0.892)

0.820

Ref

− 0.136 (− 0.790, 0.518)

− 0.128 (− 0.804, 0.547)

0.547

Ref

0.387 (− 0.458, 1.232)

1.017 (0.115, 1.920)

0.027

*T1: first tertile (≤ 5.2 mg/dL men; ≤ 3.9 mg/dL women); *T2: second tertile (5.3–6.2 mg/dL men; 4.0–4.6 mg/dL women); *T3: third tertile (≥ 6.3 mg/dL men; ≥ 4.7 mg/dL women)

Multivariate linear regression analysis was used

Model 1: adjusted for sex and age (per year)

Model 2: Model 1 + adjusted for income (quartile) and body mass index (< 18, 18–25, ≥ 25)

Model 3: Model 2 + adjusted for smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity (MET-h/week), total protein intake (g/day), hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and resistance exercise (days for 1 week)

The association of uric acid level and HGS in the elderly population is significant in subjects with metabolic syndrome

As the prevalence of metS was significantly higher in the high UA group, the elderly population was subdivided according to the presence of metS, and the associations of serum UA level and other factors with HGS were analyzed through multivariate linear regression analysis (Table 3). Old age and female gender were negatively associated with HGS, as expected. The positive association between serum UA level (tertile) and HGS remained significant only in subjects with metS (T3 vs. T1: β coefficient [95% CI] = 1.64 [0.20–3.08], p = 0.026). In addition, more resistance exercise and higher BMI were associated with greater HGS in the aged population, regardless of the presence of metS.
Table 3

Multivariate linear regression analysis for handgrip strength in the older adults (age ≥ 60) according to the presence of metabolic syndrome (N = 986)

 

No metabolic syndrome (N = 568)

Metabolic syndrome (N = 418)

β

95% CI

P

β

95% CI

P

Female

− 13.91

− 15.01, − 12.81

< 0.001

− 13.59

− 14.91, − 12.26

< 0.001

Age, years

− 0.40

−0.48, − 0.31

< 0.001

− 0.41

− 0.52, − 0.31

< 0.001

Uric acid

 T1*

Reference

Reference

 T2*

− 0.12

− 1.20, 0.96

0.827

1.27

− 0.16, 2.70

0.082

 T3*

0.80

− 0.42, 2.03

0.196

1.64

0.20, 3.08

0.026

Income

 1st quartile

Reference

Reference

 2nd quartile

1.15

− 0.12, 2.42

0.076

1.10

− 0.38, 2.59

0.144

 3rd quartile

1.15

− 0.24, 2.53

0.104

1.27

− 0.50, 3.03

0.159

 4th quartile

1.71

0.25, 3.18

0.022

0.76

− 1.15, 2.67

0.435

Current smoker

0.16

− 1.30, 1.62

0.833

0.43

− 1.45, 2.32

0.651

Alcohol (ever)

0.21

− 0.80, 1.22

0.684

0.98

− 0.29, 2.24

0.131

Physical activity (metS-h/week)

0.00

0.00, 0.01

0.169

0.00

0.00, 0.00

0.930

Resistance exercise (days for 1 week)

0.31

0.03, 0.58

0.028

0.49

0.11, 0.87

0.011

Protein intake (g/day)

0.02

0.01, 0.04

0.011

0.01

− 0.00, 0.02

0.179

BMI (kg/m2)

  < 18.5

− 1.80

− 4.58, 0.99

0.205

2.47

− 3.73, 8.66

0.434

 18.5–24.9

Reference

Reference

  ≥ 25

2.55

1.34, 3.75

< 0.001

2.11

0.95, 3.27

< 0.001

Hypertension

0.48

− 0.54, 1.49

0.354

0.98

− 0.24, 2.21

0.116

Diabetes

− 0.48

− 2.00, 1.03

0.531

− 0.05

− 1.40, 2.32

0.948

Cardiovascular disease

−0.88

− 2.73, 0.98

0.354

−0.24

−2.17, 1.68

0.803

*T1: first tertile (≤ 5.2 mg/dL men; ≤ 3.9 mg/dL women); *T2: second tertile (5.3–6.2 mg/dL men; 4.0–4.6 mg/dL women); *T3: third tertile (≥ 6.3 mg/dL men; ≥ 4.7 mg/dL women)

Multivariate linear regression analysis was used. Sex, age, uric acid (tertile), income (quartile), current smoking, alcohol (ever), physical activity, resistance exercise, protein intake, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease were included in the model by using the enter method

Risk factors for low HGS in the elderly population

As serum UA level was associated with HGS only in the elderly group, and sarcopenia usually causes problems in the elderly, the risk factors for low HGS in the elderly population were determined. Among 986 subjects aged ≥ 60, 37 out of 553 (6.7%) men and 73 out of 433 (16.9%) women had low HGS (Table 4). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age was a significant risk factor for both men (OR 1.35 [1.21–1.51]) and women (OR 1.15 [1.09–1.21]), as expected (Table 4). In addition, in male subjects, inadequate protein intake (OR 2.68 [1.06–6.81]) was a risk factor, while high serum UA level was protective (OR 0.69 [0.48–0.98]). In female subjects, diabetes mellitus was found to be a significant risk factor (OR 1.15 [1.09–1.22]); however, high serum UA level did not have a protective effect.
Table 4

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for low handgrip strength in the older adults (age ≥ 60) according to sex (N = 986)

 

Men (N = 553), low HGS (N = 37)

Women (N = 433), low HGS (N = 73)

Odds ratio

95% CI

P

Odds ratio

95% CI

P

Age, years

1.35

1.21, 1.51

< 0.001

1.15

1.09, 1.21

< 0.001

Uric acid (mg/dL)

0.69

0.48, 0.98

0.041

0.14

0.54, 1.11

0.159

Income

  

0.440

  

0.020

 1st quartile

Reference

Reference

 2nd quartile

0.58

0.18, 1.88

0.361

0.05

0.20, 0.98

0.045

 3rd quartile

1.51

0.48, 4.77

0.487

0.22

0.06, 0.78

0.019

 4th quartile

0.33

0.04, 3.17

0.340

0.31

0.09, 0.99

0.050

Current smoker

0.84

0.28, 2.55

0.754

0.90

0.14, 2.19

0.916

Alcohol (ever)

1.50

0.59, 3.86

0.398

0.71

0.36, 1.39

0.320

Physical activity (metS-h/week)

  

0.318

  

0.930

 Low

Reference

 

 Moderate

0.53

0.22, 1.32

0.172

0.95

0.49, 1.86

0.883

 High

0.37

0.04, 3.32

0.377

0.76

0.36, 1.39

0.709

Resistance exercise (≥ 2 days/week)

0.37

0.09, 1.48

0.160

0.53

0.16, 1.71

0.287

Inadequate protein intake

2.68

1.06, 6.81

0.038

1.15

0.60, 2.22

0.670

BMI (kg/m2)

  

0.800

  

0.157

 < 18.5

2.09

0.17, 25.5

0.564

2.51

0.37, 17.09

0.347

 18.5–24.9

Reference

Reference

 ≥ 25

1.70

0.11, 26.78

0.708

1.32

0.19, 9.40

0.783

Hypertension

0.97

0.38, 2.48

0.956

0.63

0.31, 1.28

0.202

Diabetes

0.54

0.17, 1.78

0.543

1.15

1.09, 1.22

0.044

Cardiovascular disease

0.48

0.12, 1.89

0.482

0.55

0.14, 2.22

0.547

Metabolic syndrome

1.45

0.48, 4.33

0.510

1.46

0.72, 2.99

0.298

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Sex, age, uric acid, income (quartile), current smoking, alcohol (ever), physical activity, resistance exercise, protein intake, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome were included in the model by using enter method

Discussion

In the current study, we verified that a high serum UA level is independently associated with increased HGS in the Korean elderly population. The protective effect of UA was significant in subjects with metS. In subjects aged 20–59 years, the association of UA with HGS was not observed after adjustment for confounding factors.

HGS measured with a hand-held dynamometer is known to properly represent overall muscle strength [26]. HGS depends not only on age, sex, and BMI, but also on socioeconomic status, physical activity, and cognitive function. As HGS declines with aging, it may represent the overall well-being of the elderly [33]. Indeed, HGS is associated with mortality in the elderly population [34]. Therefore, the maintenance of HGS is important, and the identification of factors affecting HGS is valuable, especially in the elderly population.

Our findings are consistent with the results of previous studies conducted in the elderly population. Macchi et al. [19] demonstrated that high baseline UA level was associated with better HGS at 3 years of follow-up in the elderly. A Japanese study conducted with 602 men aged 72 ± 7 years and 847 women aged 71 ± 6 years indicated that, after adjustment for confounding factors, high serum UA level was independently associated with higher HGS only in women [21]. More recently, Molino-Lova et al. [22] also demonstrated that, in a very old population (mean age 92.8 ± 3.1 years) consisting of 73 men and 166 women, higher serum UA levels correlated with better HGS.

As mentioned, studies on the relationship between UA level and muscle strength in the younger population are few; however, two recent studies included younger and elderly subjects. Huang et al. [24] reported that hyperuricemia was associated with poor muscle strength. Japanese men over 30 years of age were enrolled in the study, and 630 subjects were analyzed; however, there was no subgroup analysis stratified by age. The other study was conducted among 3595 individuals who participated in the NHANES study [25]. We used similar statistical analysis strategy with this study including the usage of sex-specific tertiles of uric acid as the main independent variable. Consistent with our results, the authors demonstrated that high serum UA level was associated with better HGS in subjects aged ≥ 60 years. Interestingly, they found a detrimental effect of UA in the young population, whereas we found no significant relationship between UA level and HGS in the young population of our study. This discrepancy seems to be partly due to the different serum UA levels of the study subjects; the mean UA levels in the young groups of both sexes were lower in our study (5.78 ± 1.29 vs. 6.0 ± 1.2 mg/dL in men, 4.3 ± 0.92 vs. 4.8 ± 1.3 mg/dL in women). Considering the results of the three studies, including ours, age seems to modify the effect of UA on HGS.

In the current study, the serum UA level of the majority of subjects was within the normal range, and only a small number of individuals had hyperuricemia, even in the T3 group.

Interestingly, we found that high serum UA level had a protective effect on HGS in elderly subjects with metS. The prevalence of metS increased with age as well as with serum UA level, and 55.5% of the elderly T3 group had metS, compared with 22.0% and 42.4% in the young and middle-aged T3 groups, respectively. On the contrary, an increased prevalence of metS in subjects with sarcopenia has been reported [35]. Several potential mechanisms underlying the association of metS with sarcopenia have been proposed. One is that reduced total muscle mass increases insulin resistance. The selective loss of muscle fibers that produce myokines that act against pathologic adipokines during aging also seems to contribute to the association between metS and sarcopenia. Although the exact explanation for the protective effect of UA in metS may require further research, the finding is novel and intriguing.

Low serum UA level was a risk factor for low HGS only in the male elderly population. These results were the opposite of those of Kawamoto et al. [21], who found that the serum UA level was independently associated with HGS only in women. This gender difference in the study is less conclusive because of the small number of low HGS subjects among men (110 out of 602). The study might be underpowered due to the small subgroup number and fail to detect a small association. However, we can assume possible reasons for the discrepancy of the results in the male population between the two studies. One plausible explanation is that the combined effects of different hormones, alcohol consumption rate, different mean UA level, and smoking habits result in this sex difference.

The major limitation of the current study was its cross-sectional design, which hampered our ability to determine causality. However, this study also had strengths in that it was conducted with a large and unbiased population with enough information for the adjustment of potential confounding factors. Also, as the seventh KNHANES did not include a tool to evaluate muscle mass such as dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, we could not determine the muscle mass component, which is critical for determining sarcopenia.

Conclusions

This population-based cross-sectional survey in Korea revealed that high serum UA level is associated with increased HGS in the aged population. UA seems to enhance muscle strength, especially in elderly individuals with metS.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

CI: 

Confidence interval

DAMP: 

Danger-associated molecular pattern

HGS: 

Hand grip strength

KNHANES: 

Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

MET: 

Metabolic equivalent

metS: 

Metabolic syndrome

OR: 

Odds ratio

UA: 

Uric acid

Declarations

Funding

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, & Future Planning (NRF-2017R1C1B2002804).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the KNHANES database which is publicly available at the KNHANES website (http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr, available in Korean).

Authors’ contributions

KYK was responsible for the study conception and design, acquisition of data, statistical analysis, and interpretation of data. JL was responsible for the interpretation of data and writing and revising the article. YSH and S-HP were responsible for the interpretation of data and revision of the article. All authors have approved the final version of the article to be published.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee at Seoul Saint Mary’s Hospital (KC18ZESI0273).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
(2)
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, #56, Dongsu-Ro, Bupyung-Gu, Incheon, South Korea

References

  1. Maiuolo J, Oppedisano F, Gratteri S, Muscoli C, Mollace V. Regulation of uric acid metabolism and excretion. Int J Cardiol. 2016;213:8–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jin M, Yang F, Yang I, Yin Y, Luo JJ, Wang H, Yang XF. Uric acid, hyperuricemia and vascular diseases. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012;17:656–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ames BN, Cathcart R, Schwiers E, Hochstein P. Uric acid provides an antioxidant defense in humans against oxidant- and radical-caused aging and cancer: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(11):6858–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker BF. Towards the physiological function of uric acid. Free Radic Biol Med. 1993;14(6):615–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kratzer JT, Lanaspa MA, Murphy MN, Cicerchi C, Graves CL, Tipton PA, Ortlund EA, Johnson RJ, Gaucher EA. Evolutionary history and metabolic insights of ancient mammalian uricases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(10):3763.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yu MA, Sanchez-Lozada LG, Johnson RJ, Kang DH. Oxidative stress with an activation of the renin-angiotensin system in human vascular endothelial cells as a novel mechanism of uric acid-induced endothelial dysfunction. J Hypertens. 2010;28(6):1234–42.Google Scholar
  7. Braga TT, Forni MF, Correa-Costa M, Ramos RN, Barbuto JA, Branco P, Castoldi A, Hiyane MI, Davanso MR, Latz E, et al. Soluble uric acid activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39884.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Martinon F, Pétrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440:237.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang J, Alderman MH. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971-1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2000;283(18):2404–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleber ME, Delgado G, Grammer TB, Silbernagel G, Huang J, Kramer BK, Ritz E, Marz W. Uric acid and cardiovascular events: a Mendelian randomization study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(11):2831–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhou H, Wang Y, Cui L, Chen Y, Li C, Zhao J. The ongoing role of serum uric acid in blood pressure. Clini Exp Hypertens. 2017;39(7):601–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Du N, Xu D, Hou X, Song X, Liu C, Chen Y, Wang Y, Li X. Inverse association between serum uric acid levels and Alzheimer’s disease risk. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(4):2594–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yin P, Lv H, Li Y, Meng Y, Zhang L, Tang P. The association between serum uric acid level and the risk of fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(8):2299–307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. El Ridi R, Tallima H. Physiological functions and pathogenic potential of uric acid: a review. J Adv Res. 2017;8(5):487–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel J-P, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee JY, Han K, McAlindon TE, Park YG, Park SH. Lower leg muscle mass relates to knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(1):126–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu P, Hao Q, Hai S, Wang H, Cao L, Dong B. Sarcopenia as a predictor of all-cause mortality among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2017;103:16–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Meng SJ, Yu LJ. Oxidative stress, molecular inflammation and sarcopenia. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(4):1509–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Macchi C, Molino-Lova R, Polcaro P, Guarducci L, Lauretani F, Cecchi F, Bandinelli S, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Higher circulating levels of uric acid are prospectively associated with better muscle function in older persons. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129(9):522–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu Y, Zhang D, Pang Z, Jiang W, Wang S, Tan Q. Association of serum uric acid level with muscle strength and cognitive function among Chinese aged 50-74 years. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(3):672–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawamoto R, Ninomiya D, Kasai Y, Kusunoki T, Ohtsuka N, Kumagi T, Abe M. Serum uric acid is positively associated with handgrip strength among Japanese community-dwelling elderly women. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0151044.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Molino-Lova R, Sofi F, Pasquini G, Vannetti F, Del Ry S, Vassalle C, Clerici M, Sorbi S, Macchi C. Higher uric acid serum levels are associated with better muscle function in the oldest old: results from the Mugello study. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;41:39–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Beavers KM, Beavers DP, Serra MC, Bowden RG, Wilson RL. Low relative skeletal muscle mass indicative of sarcopenia is associated with elevations in serum uric acid levels: findings from NHANES III. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(3):177–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang C, Niu K, Kobayashi Y, Guan L, Momma H, Cui Y, Chujo M, Otomo A, Guo H, Tadaura H, et al. An inverted J-shaped association of serum uric acid with muscle strength among Japanese adult men: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Garcia-Esquinas E, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Association between serum uric acid concentrations and grip strength: is there effect modification by age? Clin Nutr. 2018;37(2):566–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011;40(4):423–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, Chou MY, Chen LY, Hsu PS, Krairit O, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):95–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, Pascual E, Barskova V, Conaghan P, Gerster J, Jacobs J, Leeb B, Liote F, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(10):1312–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(10):3136–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kurtze N, Rangul V, Hustvedt BE. Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trondelag health study (HUNT) population of men. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC Jr, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2735–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):461–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Rijk JM, Roos PR, Deckx L, van den Akker M, Buntinx F. Prognostic value of handgrip strength in people aged 60 years and older: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(1):5–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R. Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4467.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang H, Lin S, Gao T, Zhong F, Cai J, Sun Y, Ma A. Association between sarcopenia and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and older non-obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2018;10(3):364. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030364.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement