Skip to main content
Download PDF

Radiographic damage in early rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased disability but not with pain—a 5-year follow-up study

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 25, Article number: 29 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate how radiographic damage, overall and measured as joint space narrowing score (JSNS) and erosion score (ES), as well as other clinical and laboratory measures, relate to disability and pain in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

An inception cohort of 233 patients with early RA, recruited in 1995–2005, was followed for 5 years. Disability was assessed with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and pain with a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–100 mm). Radiographs of hands and feet were evaluated using the Sharp-van der Heijde score (SHS), including JSNS and ES. The relation for radiographic scores and other clinical parameters with pain and HAQ were evaluated cross-sectionally by multivariate linear regression analysis and over time using generalized estimating equations.

Results

ES was significantly associated with HAQ cross-sectionally at inclusion, after 2 and after 5 years, and over time. Associations for HAQ with SHS and JSNS were weaker and less consistent compared with those for ES. There was no association between radiographic scores and pain at any visit. Both HAQ and pain were associated with parameters of disease activity. The strongest cross-sectional associations were found for the number of tender joints (adjusted p<0.001 at all visits).

Conclusion

Joint damage was associated with disability already in early RA. Erosions of hands and feet appear to have a greater influence on disability compared with joint space narrowing early in the disease. Pain was associated with other factors than joint destruction in early RA, in particular joint tenderness—suggesting an impact of pain sensitization.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease characterized by inflammation of joints, which in time may result in joint destruction. Irreparable damage may occur to affected joints and can lead to increased disability. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) is a validated measure for disability in RA [1]. Pain is another major symptom of RA and is typically associated with active inflammation. Although treatment outcome has greatly improved in RA in recent years [2], a substantial group of patients still suffer from non-resolved pain [3,4,5,6]. Both pain and HAQ have been associated with more sick leave, reduced quality of life, and worse mental health in patients with RA [7,8,9]. They are in other words factors that have a great impact on patients’ general health and well-being.

Joint destruction in RA includes damage to periarticular bone and articular cartilage, which can be identified by radiographs of hands and feet. Radiographic scoring can be used to assess the level of joint destruction and is often evaluated with composite measures like the Sharp-van der Heijde score (SHS) [10]. In the SHS, bone damage is quantified by the erosion score (ES) while the joint space narrowing score (JSNS) assesses damage to the cartilage.

RA-related disability is complex and could be explained both by current inflammation, which is known to fluctuate over time, and by joint destruction, which is more progressive and permanent. Several studies in established RA have shown that joint damage is associated with increased disability [11,12,13]. In patients with short disease duration, these associations have been less clear, whereas an association between radiographic scores and disability has repeatedly been shown in later stages of RA [14,15,16].

Several studies have assessed the association between disability and composite radiographic measures like the SHS, but only a few have investigated the effects of ES and JSNS separately. In these studies, disability displayed a stronger association with JSN than with erosions [17, 18].

Like disability, pain is a multifactorial experience, associated partly with disease activity, but also with central sensitization of the nervous system and psychologic factors [19]. It would also be reasonable to assume that joint destruction could have an impact on pain. This relationship is, however, less explored as compared with the association between joint damage and disability. Among patients with established RA in remission, MRI bone erosion, JSNS, and combined damage scores were associated with both HAQ and pain scores [20]. Another report concluded that MRI detected inflammation of the wrist, but not damage, was associated with functional impairment and pain in patients with early RA followed for 5 years [21].

Further insight into the relation for joint damage and other clinical measures with pain and disability in early disease could aid in early treatment decisions, with the goal of improving patient outcome. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate how joint damage, measured as SHS, as well as JSNS and ES separately, and other clinical and laboratory parameters, relates to pain and disability in early RA.

Methods

Patients

An inception cohort of 233 patients with early RA with a symptom duration ≤12 months was investigated. Patients were recruited in 1995–2005 from the rheumatology outpatient clinic of Malmö University Hospital, the only hospital serving the city, and from the four rheumatologists in private practice in Malmö. The patients were diagnosed by a specialist in rheumatology and fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for RA [22]. Post hoc analyses indicated that the 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for RA [23] were fulfilled by at least 88% of the patients [3]. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board for Southern Sweden, and all patients gave their written informed consent to participate in the study.

Clinical assessment

Patients were followed according to a structured program with clinical examinations, laboratory tests, and radiographs of hands and feet at inclusion and 12, 24, and 60 months. All clinical examinations at all visits were performed by the same experienced rheumatologist for all patients. Patients were managed according to standard care with no pre-specified protocol for anti-rheumatic treatment. Assessment of pain (see Additional file 1) and the patients’ assessment of global disease activity (PGA) were evaluated with the visual analogue scale (VAS; 0–100 mm). Disability was assessed with the Swedish-validated version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) [24]. Information on height and weight was collected at inclusion and at the 2-year follow-up through a self-administered questionnaire. Disease activity was measured with the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28). Information on current anti-rheumatic treatment was obtained at every visit through structured interviews. In addition, data on treatment with biologic DMARDs was obtained through linkage to a regional biologics register with 95% coverage in the area [25].

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured with standard methods at the Department of Clinical Chemistry at Malmö University Hospital. IgM rheumatoid factor (RF) was analyzed using ELISA, which was calibrated against the World Health Organization RF reference preparation. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies were analyzed using the Quanta Lite CCP IgG ELISA (INOVA Diagnostics, USA).

Radiographs of hands and feet were scored according to the SHS [10], as previously described [26]. One trained reader, blinded to clinical information, scored all radiographs for SHS, including the sub-scores ES and JSNS. The maximum score for hands and feet is 448 for SHS, 280 for ES, and 168 for JSNS.

Statistical analysis

Normality distribution of descriptive data was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive data was presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) depending on the distribution. Potential associations between each independent variable at inclusion and 1, 2, and 5 years and the outcome variables VAS pain and HAQ, at the same time points, were estimated with univariate linear regression analysis. Normality distribution of residuals was also evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test. All analyses were, in addition, performed with adjustment for sex and age. For the multivariate models, covariates were chosen based on the age- and sex-adjusted analysis, where covariates with a p-value ≤0.10 were considered for inclusion. In case of collinearity (bivariate correlation between covariates with r > 0.3), only the covariate with the strongest association with the outcome variable was included in the multivariate linear regression model. Sensitivity analyses were also performed with adjustment for the year of inclusion.

In addition, the longitudinal relation between radiographic and clinical parameters and outcomes was modeled using generalized estimating equations (GEE). With repeated measures of VAS pain or HAQ as the dependent variable, we investigated whether time-varying SHS, JSN, ES, and clinical variables were associated with worse pain or greater disability over time. These analyses were adjusted for age at inclusion and sex. Multivariate models were constructed based on principles similar to the linear regression analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 26.

Results

Patients

A total of 233 patients (median symptom duration 7 months) were investigated in this study (Table 1). VAS pain and HAQ improved from inclusion to 12 months. VAS pain was thereafter more or less unchanged during the follow-up period, while HAQ increased from 1 to 5 years (Table 1). Radiographic scores increased gradually between follow-up visits. Most patients were treated with methotrexate during the follow-up period, and 17% received a biologic DMARD at some point during the study.

Table 1 Patient characteristics at inclusion and at follow-up visits
Full size table

Associations for clinical and radiographic parameters with VAS pain

Cross-sectional analysis

Univariate

In univariate linear regression analysis, there were no significant associations between radiographic scores and pain at any visit. However, positive significant associations between pain and SJC28, TJC28, ESR, and CRP were present at inclusion and at follow-up visits at 1, 2, and 5 years (Table 2). Furthermore, there was a significant association between pain and female sex at 2 years, and there was a negative association between pain and age (Table 2). The results were similar in the analysis adjusted for age and sex (Additional file 2, where details on covariate selection for multivariate analyses are given). There was no association between pain and body mass index (BMI) at inclusion or after 2 years (Table 2).

Table 2 Relation between clinical and radiographic parameters and VAS pain: univariate linear regression
Full size table

Multivariate

In multivariate analysis, the associations with pain remained significant for TJC28 and CRP at inclusion and at 5 years and for TJC28 and ESR at 1 and 2 years. In addition, there were significant associations for female sex and lower age with pain in the multivariate analysis at 2 years (Table 3). The r-square for the multivariate models ranged from 0.24 to 0.29. Adjustment for the year of inclusion did not have a major impact on the results (Additional file 3).

Table 3 Relation for clinical and radiographic parameters with VAS pain and HAQ: multivariate linear regression
Full size table

Longitudinal analysis

In the longitudinal analysis using GEE, there were no significant associations for radiographic scores with pain over time (Table 4). Among variables significantly associated with pain over time in univariate analysis, age, ESR, and SJC28 remained significant also in multivariate analysis (Table 4).

Table 4 Relation between clinical and radiographic parameters and VAS pain: generalized estimating equations
Full size table

Associations for clinical and radiographic parameters with disability (HAQ)

Due to the skewed distribution of the residuals in models including HAQ at 1 year, analyses for associations between HAQ and each individual variable were only performed at inclusion, 2 years, and 5 years, since the logarithmic transformation of HAQ at 1 year did not result in a normal distribution of the residuals.

Cross-sectional analysis

Univariate

In the univariate analysis, there were positive significant associations between HAQ and ES, SJC28, TJC28, CRP, and ESR at inclusion, 2 years, and 5 years (Table 5). Furthermore, significant associations for SHS, JSNS, female sex, and higher age with HAQ were present at 5 years, and for female sex with HAQ at 2 years (Table 5). Out of the radiographic scores, the strongest and most consistent associations with HAQ were seen for ES (p<0.001 at 5 years), rather than for JSNS or total SHS. The results were similar in the age- and sex-adjusted analysis (Additional file 4, where details on covariate selection for multivariate analyses are given). BMI was not associated with worse disability at inclusion or after 2 years (Table 5).

Table 5 Relation between clinical and radiographic parameters and HAQ: univariate linear regression
Full size table

Multivariate

In the multivariate linear regression model, ES remained significantly associated with HAQ at inclusion and 5 years. Furthermore, there were significant associations for both female sex and TJC28 with HAQ at inclusion, 2 years, and 5 years and for age at 5 years (Table 3). Significant associations with HAQ remained also for CRP at inclusion and for ESR at 2 years (Table 3). In these multivariate models, the r-square ranged from 0.28 to 0.39. Adjustment for the year of inclusion did not have a major impact on the results (Additional file 5).

Longitudinal analysis

In the longitudinal univariate model, significant associations were found for ES with HAQ over time, but not for JSN or SHS with HAQ over time (Table 6). Among variables significantly associated with HAQ over time in the univariate analysis, ES, female sex, and ESR remained significant also in the multivariate analysis (Table 6).

Table 6 Relation between clinical and radiographic parameters and HAQ: generalized estimating equations
Full size table

Discussion

In this 5-year follow-up longitudinal cohort study of patients with early RA, we found that disability, measured as HAQ, was associated with ES, cross-sectionally, at inclusion and 5 years in multivariate analysis. Notably, the association for ES with HAQ was stronger and more consistent compared with that for SHS and JSNS with HAQ, respectively. Radiographic damage was not associated with pain at any point during the 5 years. By contrast, pain was associated with tender joint count and CRP (or ESR depending on the time of the outcome) in the multivariate analyses. In longitudinal analyses, using GEE, significant associations were found for ES with HAQ over time, but not with pain over time.

The stronger and more consistent association for ES with HAQ, as compared to JSNS with HAQ that was found in this study, contrasts with a report from Smolen et al. where JSN progression was the only damage score found to be associated with physical function in patients with early RA (<3-year disease duration) [17]. As their study investigated patients randomized to either adalimumab plus methotrexate or monotherapy in the PREMIER trial [17], the discrepancy from our study could be due to differences in radiographic progression and clinical outcomes between patients on early aggressive treatment in the context of a clinical trial, and an observational study of patients managed according to usual care. Another study on patients with new-onset RA found that erosive damage of the wrist, but not cartilage destruction, demonstrated by JSN, was associated with functional disability after 5 years of tightly controlled disease [27]. Furthermore, damage to the wrist was found to be the most important determinant of disability when analyzing joint groups separately. The same pattern was found by Gherghe et al., but in their study, they also showed that JSNS in the metacarpophalangeal joints was more strongly associated with impaired function [18]. This report was, however, based on patients with established RA. The conflicting results could possibly be explained by the fact that different types of lesions are more important in determining disability depending on the joints that are affected. Most likely, both cartilage destruction and erosions are important in determining physical function, and possibly JSN becomes more important with longer disease duration.

In contrast with several studies which have demonstrated joint damage to be related to disability only later during the disease course [14, 15], we found that associations between ES and HAQ existed already at inclusion in this cohort of patients with early RA. The current results are congruent with Odegard et al. who found that radiographic damage contributes to impaired physical function both at early and late disease stages [28]. This would point to the importance of early, aggressive anti-rheumatic treatment in order to stop radiographic damage and its associated disability. The conflicting findings in the various studies might be explained by differences in radiographic progression between cohorts, depending on, e.g., differences in treatment and the proportion of patients with markers of poor prognosis at inclusion. In this cohort, patients who were included during the first years of the study were not treated with biologic DMARDs, and the radiographic progression for these patients might be greater than for patients who were included later. However, in the present study, adjustment for the year of inclusion did not have a relevant impact on the results, and associations between disability and erosions were found already at inclusion, close to the time of diagnosis. Furthermore, several previous studies which did not find a relationship between radiographic damage and HAQ until later in the disease course were performed in smaller populations, compared with our cohort, resulting in lower power, and radiographic changes were not evaluated as ES and JSNS separately but only as composite scores (total SHS or the Larsen score) [15, 29, 30]. In line with those studies, statistically significant associations between SHS and HAQ were not found until the 5-year follow-up in this cohort.

The clinical relevance of the association between ES and HAQ should also be discussed. For example, a one-unit increase in ES at 5 years was associated with a 0.009 increase in HAQ, and ES in the highest quartile at 5 years ranged from 10 to 94. The minimum clinically important difference for HAQ has been reported to be 0.22 [31]. An increase of 0.009 in HAQ per unit increase in ES would hence correspond to an estimated difference in HAQ between 0.09 and 0.85 among those with extensive erosions (highest quartile) and is thus likely to be clinically significant in a subset of patients.

The lack of association between radiographic damage and pain indicates that other factors are responsible for pain in early RA. Based on the results from this study, factors associated with current joint inflammation seem to play a more important role in explaining pain. The tender joint count on the other hand, which had the strongest cross-sectional association with pain throughout the study, does not necessarily reflect only inflammation, but could also represent other pain mechanisms such as central sensitization, often present in chronic pain conditions like fibromyalgia. Coury et al. found that patients with RA and concurrent fibromyalgia were less likely to experience joint destruction [32]. These patients also had a significantly higher BMI compared with those without fibromyalgia. A negative association between high BMI and radiographic progression in RA has also been found in several studies [33,34,35]. In the present study, there was however no association between BMI and pain, although it could be noted that few patients in this cohort had severe overweight, with a mean BMI of 25 at inclusion. To conclude, pain in this cohort appears to be mainly related to inflammation, but could also be explained by central sensitization, supported by the strong association between tender joints and pain. The lack of association between joint damage and pain indicates that this aspect does not seem to contribute to the overall pain picture. It is possible that the general level of radiographic damage in early disease, such as in this cohort, is not enough to increase pain, and an effect of joint damage on pain in patients with more pronounced radiographic changes may appear later in the course of the disease. However, the joint damage among our patients was large enough to affect the level of disability already at inclusion.

Limitations of the study include the relatively small sample size which affects statistical power, especially for the analyses at 5 years where more patients have been lost to follow-up. Additionally, the majority of patients were included before the implementation of a treat to target strategy and before the use of biologic DMARDs became the standard of treatment in severe RA. The results of this study may therefore not be fully applicable to patients diagnosed after this period, although the association at inclusion should be less period-sensitive. Another limitation was that the scoring of the radiographs was performed by one single reader, increasing the risk for misclassification, although good reproducibility was demonstrated in a subset of the cohort [33]. Such misclassification is likely to be non-differential and is therefore unlikely to have resulted in any spurious results. Factors that we have not been able to evaluate, and which could have an impact on pain and disability, include mental health, coping techniques, and socioeconomic status [36,37,38]. Adding these variables to the model might have given a better explanatory power of the outcomes as the r-square ranged from 0.24 to 0.39 in the multivariate models. Furthermore, the study only evaluated radiographic damage of the hands and feet, and joint damage of larger joints might also have an impact on disability and pain.

Strengths of this study include the systematic longitudinal follow-up from a defined period of time and a defined catchment area. Consequently, selection bias should not be a major issue in this study, and the results could be generalized to patients seen in clinical practice.

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients with early RA, statistically significant associations were found between bone damage and disability, measured by HAQ, already at inclusion. Disability was more strongly and consistently associated with erosions, and less so with cartilage destruction, demonstrated by JSN. This suggests that erosions have a greater influence on disability in early disease, although cartilage damage also appears to have an impact on function in the longer run. Joint damage was not associated with patient-reported pain at any point during the 5-year follow-up, suggesting that other factors play the main role in the multifactorial pain spectrum seen in RA—for example the potential development of a coexisting chronic pain syndrome. Both pain and disability were associated with increased laboratory markers of inflammation at all time points, but even more so with joint tenderness—compatible with a role for pain sensitization.

Availability of data and materials

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

HAQ:

Health Assessment Questionnaire

SHS:

Sharp-van der Heijde score

JSNS:

Joint space narrowing score

ES:

Erosion score

ACR:

American College of Rheumatology

EULAR:

European League Against Rheumatism

PGA:

Patient global assessment

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

DAS28:

Disease Activity Score in 28 joints

DMARD:

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

CRP:

C-reactive protein

Anti-CCP:

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide

GEE:

Generalized estimating equations

SJC28:

Swollen joint cout in 28 joints

TJC28:

Tender joint count in 28 joints

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982;9(5):789–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pincus T, Sokka T, Kautiainen H. Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(4):1009–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eberhard A, Bergman S, Mandl T, Olofsson T, Rydholm M, Jacobsson L, et al. Predictors of unacceptable pain with and without low inflammation over 5 years in early rheumatoid arthritis-an inception cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Altawil R, Saevarsdottir S, Wedren S, Alfredsson L, Klareskog L, Lampa J. Remaining pain in early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with methotrexate. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(8):1061–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olofsson T, Wallman JK, Joud A, Schelin MEC, Ernestam S, van Vollenhoven R, et al. Pain over two years after start of biologic versus conventional combination treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a Swedish randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(9):1312–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Svensson B, Forslind K, Andersson M. Unacceptable pain in the BARFOT inception cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2020;49(5):371–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olofsson T, Petersson IF, Eriksson JK, Englund M, Simard JF, Nilsson J, et al. Predictors of work disability during the first 3 years after diagnosis in a national rheumatoid arthritis inception cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(5):845–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfe F, Hawley DJ. The relationship between clinical activity and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(12):2032–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goulia P, Voulgari PV, Tsifetaki N, Andreoulakis E, Drosos AA, Carvalho AF, et al. Sense of coherence and self-sacrificing defense style as predictors of psychological distress and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: a 5-year prospective study. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35(4):691–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Heijde D. How to read radiographs according to the sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):261–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Drossaers-Bakker KW, Kroon HM, Zwinderman AH, Breedveld FC, Hazes JM. Radiographic damage of large joints in long-term rheumatoid arthritis and its relation to function. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39(9):998–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke AE, St-Pierre Y, Joseph L, Penrod J, Sibley JT, Haga M, et al. Radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis correlates with functional disability but not direct medical costs. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(11):2416–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Heijde D, Landewe R, van Vollenhoven R, Fatenejad S, Klareskog L. Level of radiographic damage and radiographic progression are determinants of physical function: a longitudinal analysis of the TEMPO trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(9):1267–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scott DL, Pugner K, Kaarela K, Doyle DV, Woolf A, Holmes J, et al. The links between joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39(2):122–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Welsing PM, van Gestel AM, Swinkels HL, Kiemeney LA, van Riel PL. The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(9):2009–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Plant MJ, O'Sullivan MM, Lewis PA, Camilleri JP, Coles EC, Jessop JD. What factors influence functional ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Do they alter over time? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(9):1181–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smolen JS, van der Heijde DM, Keystone EC, van Vollenhoven RF, Goldring MB, Guerette B, et al. Association of joint space narrowing with impairment of physical function and work ability in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: protection beyond disease control by adalimumab plus methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(7):1156–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gherghe AM, Ramiro S, Landewe R, Mihai C, van der Heijde D. Association of the different types of radiographic damage with physical function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of the RAPID trials. RMD Open. 2016;2(1):e000219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang A, Lee YC. Mechanisms for joint pain in rheumatoid arthritis (RA): from cytokines to central sensitization. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(5):603–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Glinatsi D, Brahe CH, Hetland ML, Ornbjerg L, Krabbe S, Baker JF, et al. Association between MRI findings and patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission and at relapse. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020;23(4):488–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glinatsi D, Baker JF, Hetland ML, Horslev-Petersen K, Ejbjerg BJ, Stengaard-Pedersen K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessed inflammation in the wrist is associated with patient-reported physical impairment, global assessment of disease activity and pain in early rheumatoid arthritis: longitudinal results from two randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(10):1707–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(3):315–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ekdahl C, Eberhardt K, Andersson SI, Svensson B. Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford health assessment questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol. 1988;17(4):263–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Geborek P, Nitelius E, Noltorp S, Petri H, Jacobsson L, Larsson L, et al. Population based studies of biological antirheumatic drug use in southern Sweden: comparison with pharmaceutical sales. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(12):1805–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rydell E, Forslind K, Nilsson J, Karlsson M, Åkesson KE, Jacobsson LTH, et al. Predictors of radiographic erosion and joint space narrowing progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study. Arthr Res Ther. 2021;23(1):27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Koevoets R, Dirven L, Klarenbeek NB, van Krugten MV, Ronday HK, van der Heijde DM, et al. Insights in the relationship of joint space narrowing versus erosive joint damage and physical functioning of patients with RA. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):870–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Odegard S, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Uhlig T. Association of early radiographic damage with impaired physical function in rheumatoid arthritis: a ten-year, longitudinal observational study in 238 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(1):68–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mottonen T, Paimela L, Leirisalo-Repo M, Kautiainen H, Ilonen J, Hannonen P. Only high disease activity and positive rheumatoid factor indicate poor prognosis in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with “sawtooth” strategy. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57(9):533–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Molenaar ET, Voskuyl AE, Dijkmans BA. Functional disability in relation to radiological damage and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(2):267–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wells GA, Tugwell P, Kraag GR, Baker PR, Groh J, Redelmeier DA. Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient’s perspective. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(3):557–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Coury F, Rossat A, Tebib A, Letroublon MC, Gagnard A, Fantino B, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia: a frequent unrelated association complicating disease management. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(1):58–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rydell E, Forslind K, Nilsson J, Jacobsson LTH, Turesson C. Smoking, body mass index, disease activity, and the risk of rapid radiographic progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthr Res Ther. 2018;20(1):82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaufmann J, Kielstein V, Kilian S, Stein G, Hein G. Relation between body mass index and radiological progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(11):2350–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Westhoff G, Rau R, Zink A. Radiographic joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis is highly dependent on body mass index. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(11):3575–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Edwards RR, Cahalan C, Mensing G, Smith M, Haythornthwaite JA. Pain, catastrophizing, and depression in the rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7(4):216–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Prothero L, Barley E, Galloway J, Georgopoulou S, Sturt J. The evidence base for psychological interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;82:20–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van Hecke O, Torrance N, Smith BH. Chronic pain epidemiology and its clinical relevance. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(1):13–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In remembrance of Christina Book, MD, PhD, who initiated this project and performed a major part of the data collection. She passed away before the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Lund University. This work was supported by The Swedish Research Council [grant number 2015-02228], The Swedish Rheumatism Association [grant number R-664091], Lund University [grant number ALFSKANE-446501], and The Foundation for Assistance to Disabled People in Skane.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 1b, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden

    Anna Eberhard, Emil Rydell, Thomas Mandl & Carl Turesson

  2. Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden

    Anna Eberhard

  3. Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Kristina Forslind, Stefan Bergman & Tor Olofsson

  4. Spenshult Research and Development Center, Halmstad, Sweden

    Kristina Forslind & Stefan Bergman

  5. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Stefan Bergman

  6. Department of Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

    Tor Olofsson & Carl Turesson

  7. Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Lennart T. H. Jacobsson

Authors
  1. Anna Eberhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emil Rydell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristina Forslind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Bergman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas Mandl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tor Olofsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lennart T. H. Jacobsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Carl Turesson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AE participated in the study design, performed the statistical analysis, participated in the interpretation of the results, and drafted the manuscript. ER performed an article search, including compilation of relevant articles, and participated in the interpretation of the results. SB, TM and TO all participated in the interpretation of the results. KF performed the scoring of the radiographs, and participated in the interpretation of data. LJ participated in the study design, and the interpretation of the results. CT participated in the study design, in the interpretation of the results, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors participated in revising the manuscript critically, and approved the final version to be submitted for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Eberhard.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board for southern Sweden (Lund, Sweden: LU 410-94) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave their written informed consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Question for pain.

Additional file 2.

Relation for clinical and radiographic parameters with VAS pain; linear regression, adjusted for age and sex.

Additional file 3.

Relation for clinical and radiographic parameters with VAS pain; multivariate linear regression. Sensitivity analysis, including inclusion calendar year as covariate.

Additional file 4.

Relation for clinical and radiographic parameters with HAQ; linear regression, adjusted for age and sex.

Additional file 5.

Relation for clinical and radiographic parameters with HAQ; multivariate linear regression. Sensitivity analysis, including inclusion calendar year as covariate.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eberhard, A., Rydell, E., Forslind, K. et al. Radiographic damage in early rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased disability but not with pain—a 5-year follow-up study. Arthritis Res Ther 25, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03015-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03015-9

Keywords

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us